IRC log for #wowhead on 20110411

00:13.59*** join/#wowhead Slackwise (~slackwise@c-24-14-146-100.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
00:19.57*** join/#wowhead Slackwise_ (~slackwise@c-24-14-146-100.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
00:27.29[-jon-]prospecting in bgs makes people rage
00:29.48*** join/#wowhead Aeyan (~pancake@cpe-024-163-014-009.triad.res.rr.com)
00:37.33[-jon-]are there any addons that add up what you have for sale and what money is pending?
00:48.00*** join/#wowhead arcanium (~michael@c-24-98-130-220.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
01:34.18*** join/#wowhead Noxy (~Noxy2@rrcs-64-183-226-149.sw.biz.rr.com)
01:37.00*** join/#wowhead Lugburz (~LUGGEH@c-71-227-168-72.hsd1.wa.comcast.net)
01:41.59*** join/#wowhead Jayle (~Ilorin@67-197-8-52.rh1.dyn.cm.comporium.net)
01:46.13*** join/#wowhead yarddog (~yarddog@70.88.160.150)
01:46.18*** join/#wowhead yarddog (~yarddog@belencomputers/staff/yarddog)
02:05.04*** join/#wowhead humma_kavula (hhgttg@unaffiliated/hummakavula/x-458624)
02:36.48*** join/#wowhead Funkeh` (~funk@5ad4d5e7.bb.sky.com)
02:36.48*** join/#wowhead Funkeh` (~funk@WoWUIDev/WoWAce/Ace3/BigWigs/funkeh)
02:44.56Domh~weather CYYT
02:45.07*** join/#wowhead Jamash (~Jamash@adsl-76-251-85-161.dsl.bltnin.sbcglobal.net)
02:52.31BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1301.JPG.html
02:55.02*** part/#wowhead sour (~bcoca@dsl081-197-237.nyc2.dsl.speakeasy.net)
02:55.26BlackNeti finally broke out my light tent
02:55.53*** join/#wowhead Arkaen (~Brett@75.97.33.129.res-cmts.sebh.ptd.net)
03:00.18StormkittyIt's funny seeing how worked up we Canadians can get about hockey. Gretzky's infamous trade in 1988: "upset Canadians to the extent that New Democratic Party House Leader Nelson Riis demanded that the government block it"
03:06.28RawsI heard you guys are postponing a debate so people can watch the Bruins game the night before
03:06.34RawsIt's turned into news here in Boston
03:07.22RawsOh, the Habs
03:07.31RawsHilarious
03:09.56StormkittyYup
03:10.08StormkittyNot post-poning
03:10.10Stormkittypre-poning
03:10.13StormkittyIt's airing a day earlier
03:10.28StormkittyAlso it's the French debates so how much you wanna bet nobody would watch it
03:10.32Stormkittyif it was same time as the Habs
03:13.09StormkittyAlso Raws http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8IGDIujijQ
03:14.02RawsI saw that the other day
03:14.04*** join/#wowhead rcfreak0 (~rcfreak0@75-129-147-218.dhcp.fdul.wi.charter.com)
03:14.10StormkittyDon't be a beech!
03:14.11RawsThat guy is like a skinny Duke Nukem
03:14.11StormkittyCome on
03:14.31StormkittyRaws it gets better. In one of the videos you find out
03:14.32Stormkittyhis name
03:14.33Stormkittyis Dimitri
03:17.40BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1298.JPG.html how is this one
03:18.43RawsAngelic
03:19.19BlackNettoss up with the first one
03:19.48RawsI like the honesty of the first one
03:20.26BlackNetlighting is a bit off on the first one
03:20.54RawsI'd like to get a black backdrop and photograph some colorful side-lit flowers against it
03:21.07BlackNeti did that the other night
03:21.12RawsMaybe even rear-lit
03:21.32BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1187.JPG.html
03:21.39BlackNetand http://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1195.JPG.html
03:21.52RawsSweet
03:22.02RawsThat second one looks like some kind of sea anemone
03:22.09BlackNetlol
03:22.18BlackNetit's a vine that's not fully open
03:22.19BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1284.JPG.html
03:22.23BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1285.JPG.html
03:22.26BlackNetthis is fully open
03:22.41RawsOh, those things rule, I've seen them before
03:22.59BlackNetclematis crystal rain.
03:23.15BlackNetit's a 6-8 foot vine that resembles morning glory
03:23.17RawsNice color on the lattice and everything in the second
03:23.30BlackNethas a good 5 inch spread
03:23.42RawsPretty impressive
03:24.07BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1297.JPG.html here is my starlight oriental lilly's in bloom
03:24.46RawsWow
03:25.05BlackNetand street view of my house. http://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1108.JPG.html
03:25.14BlackNetim on the right, the pink dogwood is my driveway
03:25.56RawsHuh, cool tree variety around the neighborhood
03:26.19RawsWhat's that tall narrow pink one in the center background?
03:27.53Gary13579didn't he literally just say it was a pink dogwood
03:28.09RawsDogwoods aren't tall and narrow :P
03:28.11Gary13579or am I missing the tree you are speaking of
03:28.38RawsIt's way in the background, and is tall like a pine tree
03:28.39Gary13579pink dogwood is certainly rather small :|
03:28.39BlackNetthe white ones is white dogwood
03:28.43Gary13579covers a lot of surface area maybe
03:29.30Gary13579Oh okay I see it, I don't think it's actually pink though
03:29.35RawsI have a white dogwood and pink cherry tree, and my neighbor has a sweet red japanese maple
03:29.42BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1052.JPG.html
03:29.48BlackNetthat's the blooms close up
03:30.07Rawswtheck color is it, Gary
03:30.19BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1102.JPG.html and that's the view from my living room
03:30.25BlackNetlooking to the right
03:30.26RawsI've never seen a tall, narrow blooming tree that high
03:30.40RawsIn the US, at least
03:31.03Gary13579Raws, mmm I can't think of the proper english phrase for it, but a combination of angle, lighting, and camera making it appear a color it isn't if you were to stand right next to it in full daylight
03:31.43RawsThat's one hell of an optical effect if it's supposed to be green
03:32.01RawsAnyway, I'm outta here
03:32.08RawsGoonnight, internet
03:32.13Gary13579I do know of a few purple-ish evergreens
03:32.13BlackNetthe tall one in the middle is white dogwood
03:32.16Gary13579it is an evergreen, yes?
03:33.04BlackNetwhich?
03:33.08BlackNetdogwood?
03:33.21Gary13579Look at the white dogwoods, in the center, then look up
03:33.26Gary13579Tall narrow scrawny mother fucker
03:33.35Gary13579with appearingly purple leaves
03:34.13BlackNetby the black car?
03:34.26Gary13579it looks like some kind of dying trimmed evergreen,t o me
03:34.33Gary13579what? no, above the white dogwood.
03:34.57BlackNetthere is some border stuff, that might be it
03:35.49BlackNetthat neighbor, one with the black car is disabled and cant do much at all
03:39.18BlackNetlooking to see if i have anymore shots from that day
03:41.12BlackNetnope
04:00.53*** join/#wowhead rcfreak0 (~rcfreak0@75-129-147-218.dhcp.fdul.wi.charter.com)
04:17.37*** join/#wowhead Terra (~top@c-71-201-3-22.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
04:18.05*** join/#wowhead Ufretin (~34873@87.54.59.222)
04:29.17*** join/#wowhead dunder (~nnscript@c-83-233-117-58.cust.bredband2.com)
04:53.09StormkittySubway challenge: Go to subway and order a sub without saying "uh" or "um"
05:00.21*** join/#wowhead Mowsey (~Mowsey@99-125-182-163.lightspeed.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net)
05:00.57*** join/#wowhead Gaelos (~Gaelos@AOrleans-555-1-38-205.w109-209.abo.wanadoo.fr)
05:01.08*** part/#wowhead Gaelos (~Gaelos@AOrleans-555-1-38-205.w109-209.abo.wanadoo.fr)
05:02.18*** join/#wowhead dunderr (~nnscript@c-83-233-117-58.cust.bredband2.com)
05:02.57*** join/#wowhead Shwaffle (~aafaafaaf@63-152-142-42.dia.static.qwest.net)
05:13.07*** join/#wowhead hahuang65 (~hahuang65@c-76-126-13-144.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
05:42.45kullervoStormkitty: want to remind me about the amount of hit needed to interrupt raidbosses?
05:44.59Stormkittywat
05:45.21fewynover 9000
05:45.26Stormkitty^
05:45.33kullervono really
05:45.40kullervowas it 5% aka... n rating
05:45.42kullervoor more
05:45.48fewyn17%
05:45.53kullervomelee
05:45.58fewyn26%
05:46.03kullervojesus
05:46.10fewyni have no idea
05:46.21kullervoyeah so I asked someone who probably has
05:46.38Stormkitty8% for specials
05:46.49fewyni was close!
05:46.50Stormkitty27% for white attacks while dual-wielding
05:47.03StormkittyI might be wrong, check wowpedia
05:52.29*** join/#wowhead Alvraen (~Alvie@ip72-220-6-30.sd.sd.cox.net)
06:00.14*** join/#wowhead g0urra (5045e70a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.80.69.231.10)
06:13.47*** join/#wowhead Shigy (~user@182-239-141-251.ip.adam.com.au)
06:16.34*** join/#wowhead bien|| (~bien@p57B63D17.dip.t-dialin.net)
06:39.39*** join/#wowhead nmsiz (~none@h70n5-e-a12.ias.bredband.telia.com)
06:40.29*** join/#wowhead rcfreak0_ (~rcfreak0@75-129-147-218.dhcp.fdul.wi.charter.com)
06:55.53*** join/#wowhead Anmity (~Anmity@h179n8c1o851.bredband.skanova.com)
07:00.48*** join/#wowhead Kamikaze28 (~Kamikaze2@unaffiliated/kamikaze28)
07:12.41Evioushttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_1PfqGVSg0
07:12.44EviousI want that shirt
07:20.11*** join/#wowhead nmsiz (~none@h70n5-e-a12.ias.bredband.telia.com)
07:21.43*** join/#wowhead Icystorm (~DarkONI@ppp-94-68-162-254.home.otenet.gr)
07:23.37*** join/#wowhead MedIir (Medlir@adsl-75-7-194-55.dsl.lgtpmi.sbcglobal.net)
07:25.41*** join/#wowhead nmsiz (~none@h70n5-e-a12.ias.bredband.telia.com)
07:27.15Evioushttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-3YuU8lBUM
07:27.24*** join/#wowhead Fujiro (~Fujiro@PC-77-46-21-14.euro-net.pl)
07:27.38*** part/#wowhead Fujiro (~Fujiro@PC-77-46-21-14.euro-net.pl)
07:30.42*** join/#wowhead Anmity_ (~Anmity@h179n7c1o851.bredband.skanova.com)
07:41.25*** join/#wowhead Kamikaze28 (~Kamikaze2@unaffiliated/kamikaze28)
07:55.54g0urrahttp://www.askmrrobot.com/wow/gear
08:00.57Stormkittyhttp://fukung.net/v/27490/1b38def8b2f1ab9a9ff4f1fed2cfe03c.jpg Nature. It doesn't care.
08:03.44IcystormThe tree was hungry... Probably.
08:07.45*** join/#wowhead Zeiris (~Zeiris@S010600a0d1423e73.no.shawcable.net)
08:28.01g0urrahttp://www.gmbase.com/bbs/Topic.aspx?BoardID=46&TopicID=1878
08:28.02g0urracheck out the other illustrations, the man is a genius
08:30.29stufhttp://fukung.net/v/8473/647c669a7bf1ce6aee1c80d4e6dba336.jpg bhahaha
08:34.48Stormkittyhttp://fukung.net/v/27587/slide_5921_79826_large.jpg
08:39.29g0urraso old
08:45.45IcystormHey, guys, new Reign of Chaos screenshots! http://goo.gl/oA5iM
08:46.23Icystorm(for the curious, yes, it's battle.net's 2002 website)
08:47.51hyljeslowpoke
08:55.47g0urrahttp://replay.waybackmachine.org/19961223104720/http://battle.net/
08:55.47g0urrawin
09:01.34Stormkittyhttp://i.imgur.com/CRxoC.png
09:05.03g0urrahttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/04/meet-the-senator-blocking-big-contents-web-censorship-plan.ars
09:05.10g0urraRon Wyden's possibly the best senator the U.S. has.
09:10.56*** join/#wowhead jnwhiteh_ (~jnwhiteh@li37-84.members.linode.com)
09:22.42BlackNetbut he thinks you should be able to sue gun manufactures for someone doing crimes like robing gas stations.
09:23.39StormkittyI'd say sue American society
09:23.46g0urraI'd sue Stormkitty
09:23.49Stormkittyfor making sure everybody and their dog has a gun
09:23.53g0urra^
09:24.09BlackNetthat's like being able to sue ford motor company because someone ran over someone and killed them with a car
09:24.19StormkittyI'd say sue the guy who died
09:24.22Stormkittyhe didn't get out of the way
09:24.26Stormkittyand wrecked the car
09:24.27Stormkittyjeez
09:24.28Stormkittyselfish git
09:24.40hyljeyou better be ironic
09:24.49g0urraBlackNet: I'd like to see the guy that uses a gun to drive
09:24.54StormkittyI'd make a good ambulance chasing personal injury lawyer
09:25.07BlackNetg0urra you missed the point. re-read what i said
09:25.10g0urralet's see.. what is guns good for.. that's right, shooting and hurting people
09:25.21g0urrathere is nothing good with guns.
09:25.28Stormkitty^
09:25.28g0urratrying to compare it to cars it absurd
09:25.44hyljeguns are good when used to kill bad people
09:25.45StormkittyI find the idea that Americans actually have the RIGHT to use a gun
09:25.47Stormkittyto be absurd
09:25.59BlackNetg0urra that's why cars kill and injure more people per year :)
09:26.06StormkittyActually...
09:26.13g0urrahylje: of course, but that doesn't mean that everyone should have a gun to kill people
09:26.37hyljeyou never know when you encounter a bad person
09:26.52BlackNetfirst off neither of you know the issue that well
09:27.09g0urraamericans has always been crazy for guns
09:27.11g0urrafor CENTURIES
09:27.23Stormkitty^
09:27.29g0urraso I guess it's pretty pointless to point out the risks for guns
09:27.36StormkittyThey just don't get it.
09:27.40g0urrasince, you know, you're so damn convinced that guns are GOOD
09:27.47BlackNetvehicles has more risk btw
09:28.02StormkittyThat's why you need a license.
09:28.25BlackNetlicense does not slow the death or injury rate down any
09:28.40g0urrabecause retards either don't have a license, drives drunk, or does something else that requires attention (like speaking on a mobile phones)
09:28.46g0urranot to mention the ones that drive too fast
09:28.53StormkittyDon't drive like a tard and amazing
09:28.57StormkittyYou'll have a perfect record
09:29.18hyljecars and roads are engineered to be unsafe for everyone that is not a car
09:29.19g0urraBlackNet: tell me, why did people who drove cars die, or die by the ones that drove cars?
09:29.25BlackNetthat senator has serious double standards btw.
09:29.27StormkittyMy uncle's been driving since he was 17 years old. He turned 56 this year. You know how many accidents he's had?
09:29.27Stormkitty0.
09:29.52BlackNetvoted for gun control and all but yet votes to prohibit liability and slander against bloggers.
09:29.56g0urraBlackNet: tell me, why did people who drove cars die, or die by the ones that drove cars?
09:29.57BlackNetmajor double standards there
09:30.01g0urraBlackNet: tell me, why did people who drove cars die, or die by the ones that drove cars?
09:30.09g0urraway to turn around the conversation
09:30.19StormkittyThis conversation is getting fascinating.
09:30.38g0urrasorry, the discussion
09:30.51BlackNetg0urra mind rephrasing that question?
09:31.40g0urrayou say people die and get injured by cars every year. mind tell me WHY they get killed and injured?
09:32.05BlackNetvery diverse reasons
09:32.09StormkittyPeople get killed and injured by guns for one reason: It's a gun. It's designed to kill people.
09:32.21StormkittyIt's for causing lethal harm to another organism.
09:32.38g0urraBlackNet: give me examples
09:32.48BlackNetg0urra http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_collision
09:32.50hyljei would argue most streets are designed to kill people by the virtue of enabling people to drive too fast
09:33.12hyljeyou can design a street to at most injure people, and it's very reasonable wherever there's any pedestrians
09:33.17g0urralet's see
09:33.17Stormkittyhylje I'd wager it's teenagers who think they're invincible
09:33.35g0urravehicle design < not the fault of the driver. so suing the car company is reasonable
09:33.46BlackNetStormkitty truth be known movies and the like has given you a serious biased towards firearms and you have a phobia
09:33.47g0urraspeed of operation < completely at the fault of the driver.
09:33.59StormkittyBlackNet: No I'm realistic.
09:34.01g0urraroad design < fault of the ones that don't maintain the roads
09:34.12g0urradriver impairmen < they should know their limits to driving
09:34.15StormkittyIt's a gun. It's for killing people.
09:34.16StormkittyPeriod.
09:34.30BlackNetg0urra oh btw. there are laws against suits against car lots, manufactures and the like for deaths and the like.
09:34.45BlackNetif someone runs over you and kills you with a honda you cant sue honda for it
09:34.51g0urraERROR 505 CAREFACE NOT FOUND
09:34.55g0urraanyway
09:35.01StormkittyBlackNet we're talking about person dying because car design was horrible
09:35.06Stormkittyand they died because they hit a wall
09:35.15Stormkittyand none of the safety equipment worked
09:35.21BlackNetif someone crashes into a gas station and steals the register with a ford suv you cant sue ford motor company :)
09:35.22Stormkittyetc
09:35.30g0urrainjuries and deaths from cars is a "side effect" of driving, where on the other hand deaths and injuries from guns is the PURPOSE of guns
09:35.35StormkittyStop trying to shift the conversation
09:36.00BlackNetbut this senator wants you to be able to sue glock becuase some crackhead stole a cop's glock and knocked over a gas station
09:36.09g0urrathe purpose of cars it TRANSPORTATION. purpose of guns is DEATHS and INJURIES
09:36.18g0urrais*
09:36.27BlackNetg0urra that is not correct
09:36.32g0urrarofl. right
09:36.36StormkittyOh really now.
09:36.45BlackNetexplain bb guns or pellet guns
09:36.49BlackNetor .17
09:37.03StormkittyYou ever been shot with a pellet gun?
09:37.10StormkittyI'd say that's pretty injurious
09:37.16BlackNetactually yes i have
09:38.29BlackNeti didnt' die :) nor was i injured
09:38.36g0urratoo bad.
09:41.04BlackNetsee classic case in point right there :)
09:41.18BlackNetno need to be afraid of objects, it's the person you need to be concerned with
09:42.16StormkittyIt's not fear, it's being practical.
09:42.18BlackNetjust because i take my firearms near a school does not mean it will discharge
09:42.23BlackNetStormkitty it's a phobia
09:42.29StormkittyNo, it's not.
09:42.46BlackNetpsychologists and socialogist will beg to differ
09:42.53BlackNetand denial is not a river in egypt
09:43.10StormkittyI have no phobia of guns. I'll go to a shooting range and fire off various guns no problem, and I'll handle them no problem.
09:43.15g0urraStormkitty: trying to argue against the gun crazy americans is useless.. they'll never listen. they haven't for centuries
09:43.21StormkittyI just think civilians have no business carrying them around in public.
09:43.27g0urra^
09:43.54BlackNetStormkitty what country do you live in again?
09:43.56StormkittyThe reason you have high gun crime is BECAUSE you all have guns
09:44.06*** join/#wowhead Anubisss (~anubisss@77.111.167.112)
09:44.20StormkittyCanada, along with the rest of the civilised people in North America.
09:44.24BlackNetStormkitty the uk has a very high crime rate and they dont have guns there. how is that possible?
09:44.33StormkittyNote the fucking word GUN CIRME
09:44.35hyljeknifes
09:44.36Stormkittyyou dumb shit
09:44.50StormkittyI'll spell it out again because you're a sub-moronic American
09:44.51StormkittyGUN. CRIME.
09:45.01g0urrainb4 BlackNet turns the argument to knife crimes
09:45.07Stormkitty^5 g0urra
09:45.13g0urra^5 Stormkitty
09:46.25StormkittyWhat about the crime that is American music
09:46.28Stormkitty:3
09:46.45BlackNetcanada and us is almost equal.
09:46.52*** join/#wowhead Ashley_ (~asgely_ro@vip-1.netbanx.com)
09:46.55StormkittyExcept we're not gun nuts
09:46.58Stormkittyand we have sane laws
09:47.08BlackNetthe last numbers i did look at a while back used data that was 10 years old for canada vs 1 year old from the us
09:47.25BlackNetsane laws? now i know you are on crack
09:47.42g0urra.. the cleaning lady has a ring tone of Stardust - Music Sounds Better With You
09:47.46StormkittySo if we're equal, where's your national health service? Or lack of a DMCA? or non-Big Brother esque police powers
09:48.29BlackNetdo tell me where the sanity is in forced registration
09:48.38StormkittyHow about your military, where rape and sexual harassment is commonplace
09:49.07BundyFirearm homicide rate
09:49.08Bundyper 100,000 pop
09:49.22BlackNetBundy better exclude suicides
09:49.31BundyUS: 2.97 - Canada - 0.54
09:49.31g0urralol why
09:49.35Stormkittyinb4 g0urra corrects BlackNet
09:49.49g0urra2l8
09:49.53BlackNetBundy and quote years on the figures
09:50.00StormkittyHey g0urra I heard a suicide is a homicide now
09:50.07g0urraholy crap
09:50.13BundySource: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2000[8]
09:50.26g0urra10 years
09:50.38BlackNetso 2000 for one and 2008 for the other :)
09:50.50Bundyuh, no?
09:50.51Stormkitty"Canadian police services reported just over 8,100 victims of violent gun crime in 2006"
09:51.06StormkittyThat includes people who didn't die.
09:51.11StormkittyThat's probably one DAY for the US.
09:51.28Bundyapperently us and canada figures are 1999
09:51.35Bundybut both are from the same year
09:52.12BlackNetthat would be new. almost all the sources quoted differs greatly on the year
09:52.18StormkittyI'm grabbing 2006 statistics right now
09:52.20Stormkittyfor Canada
09:52.40g0urrahttp://www.unodc.org/images/data-and-analysis/Homicide-sub-region-two_sources.gif
09:52.58g0urrableh. stupid statistics blending canada and US
09:52.58StormkittyHomicide per 100,000 in Canada for 2006: 1.9
09:53.09StormkittyLowest in PEI at 0.7
09:53.14BlackNetinteresting that they show same color for us and canada there g0urra :)
09:53.18StormkittyHighest in Newfoundland at 1.4
09:53.24Stormkittywait what
09:53.32StormkittyThat can't be right
09:53.53Stormkittyoh ok they don't include all the provinces in the chart, but the national average does
09:54.36g0urracanada: 1.7
09:54.38BlackNetg0urra look at the spread range they give
09:54.41StormkittyCases of homicide in Yukon Territory in 2006: 0.0
09:54.41g0urraUS: 5.2
09:54.50g0urrahttp://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/homicide.html
09:54.54g0urraHomicide statistics, Trends (2003-2008)
09:54.56g0urraclick it
09:55.03StormkittyWhat throws off the numbers a lot is Nunavut has high homicide rates for some reason
09:55.07BlackNetcomparing 2003 vs 2008 is just fail
09:55.21g0urraproblem?
09:55.25BlackNetStormkitty drugs is the problem there
09:55.48StormkittyActually, it's sniffing gas fumes.
09:55.50StormkittyI shit you not.
09:55.54BundyBlackNet : do you really think that the overall stats has changed over 5 years?
09:56.00StormkittyIt was a big issue in Labrador in the 90s
09:56.01BlackNetBundy yes
09:56.05Stormkittynatives would sniff bags of gas fumes
09:56.07Stormkittyto get high
09:56.11BlackNetit changes drastically according to whats going on
09:56.22Bundydo you have anything to back it up?
09:56.30BlackNetStormkitty that still falls under the drug use realm
09:56.38BlackNetBundy look at the tends
09:56.40StormkittyCanada had 594 murders TOTAL in 2006.
09:56.45g0urraUnited Republic of Tanzania25,8
09:56.46g0urrao_O
09:56.47StormkittyAmerican has that many in a day probably.
09:56.59Ashley_this seems like a lovely conversation
09:57.24StormkittyIn 2001, Canada had about 32,000 people in prison or about 0.13% of the total population.
09:57.29Stormkittyand that hasn't really changed much.
09:57.39g0urraCanada1,62004
09:57.44g0urraUnited States of America6,02005
09:57.47BundyBlackNet :what trends?
09:57.50g0urradoesn't differ much from other statistics
09:58.11StormkittyOnly trend I see
09:58.16StormkittyAmericans like killing each other
09:58.19StormkittyCanadians don't
09:58.20g0urra^
09:58.24g0urraafk
09:58.34BlackNetBundy patterns and relations to what is going on at the time.
09:58.46BlackNetStormkitty that's pure bullshit and you know it
09:58.51StormkittyNot really.
09:58.54StormkittyThe statistics say it.
09:59.15StormkittyHomicide rate of 6 per 100,000 in 2005? That's pretty damn high for a supposedly modern nation.
09:59.21Bundyits pretty obvious from the statistics
10:00.23BlackNetStormkitty now look at the rape stats
10:00.34Stormkittyhttp://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/Crime-statistics/Pivot_by_Country.20100201.xls trends for 2003-2008 homicide around the world
10:00.37BlackNetand look at the vehicle death rate
10:01.31StormkittyWhy don't you
10:01.35BlackNeti did
10:01.37StormkittySince you're the one telling us to.
10:01.42StormkittyThen provide us with a link.
10:02.05BlackNetdo your work for you?
10:02.09Bundyhaha
10:02.12Bundydude
10:02.12StormkittyWe're doing it for you.
10:02.30StormkittyNo link = you didn't actually look
10:02.35Stormkittyand are making shit up
10:02.37Stormkittyand are now denying it
10:02.44StormkittyLess strawman pl0x
10:02.46BlackNethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-related_death_rate
10:02.47BlackNetthere
10:03.10robokitty:|
10:03.11Bundyrape stats
10:03.14Bundy2009 Rate / 100,000
10:03.14robokitty|:
10:03.22BundyUS: 28.6
10:03.24BlackNetinteresting to note MORE deaths in canada by cars than in the us
10:03.30StormkittyNo.
10:03.30Bundycanada: 1.5
10:03.35StormkittyUS: 15
10:03.36StormkittyCanada: 13
10:03.39StormkittyProblem, Americans?
10:04.16StormkittyPer 100k vehicles. Per 100k people: USA 12.3, Canada 9.2
10:04.21StormkittyStill less
10:04.22StormkittyHOW ODD
10:04.23BlackNetok shows here about equal
10:04.33StormkittyHow about you actually read it
10:04.36StormkittySince you obv didn't
10:04.40BlackNet8.2 and 8.5
10:04.56Stormkittythat's per billion vehicle km
10:05.04BlackNetthe only realistic figure
10:05.04Stormkittyand Canada is lower AGAIN on that one
10:05.16BlackNetnot by much
10:05.20StormkittyBundy do you see a pattern
10:05.21StormkittyI do
10:05.52BundyI see the usual denial
10:05.59BlackNet15 and 13 for 100k vehicles
10:06.05Bundyand i wonder why i even waste my time arguing about this
10:06.16BlackNetso canadians and americans like to kill people with cars
10:06.23robokittyYou're arguing on the internet
10:06.27Bundyyes
10:06.28Bundyim retarded
10:06.29Bundyi know
10:06.30robokittyThat's the problem in the first place, right there
10:06.33Bundy:)
10:06.45Bundyespecially in this channel
10:06.50Bundyi seem to get into retarded arguments
10:06.53BlackNetrobokitty because they are to chicken shit to do it in person
10:07.05StormkittyNot really.
10:07.06Bundyhah
10:07.10StormkittyI'd just punch you in the face
10:07.11Stormkittyand walk away
10:07.13robokitty^^
10:07.14Stormkittyabout 20 minutes ago
10:07.20Bundyand then he'd shoot you
10:07.23Bundyand rape you
10:07.24StormkittySince you have no desire to listen to reason
10:07.31StormkittyBundy: then run me over with his car
10:07.32robokittyand then you'd be the stereotypical USmerican
10:07.52BlackNetStormkitty then provide some reason and not some phobia
10:08.06StormkittyYou keep on using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
10:08.24BundyWhat is it you want a reason for?
10:08.35StormkittyThat's what I'm curious about actually.
10:08.40StormkittySince I already provided one some time ago.
10:09.06Stormkitty[02:43:17] <Stormkitty> I just think civilians have no business carrying them [guns] around in public
10:09.12BlackNethttp://common-phobias.com/Hoplo/phobia.htm
10:09.25StormkittyBundy: I say we let him keep talking
10:09.26BlackNetand that is an opinion
10:09.28StormkittySee where this ends up
10:09.32StormkittyIt can be fun
10:09.34robokittyin before "the need for a strong and well-armed militia"
10:09.38BlackNetone that has been given no reason at all for i might add :)
10:09.41Stormkittyinb4 american gun fanatics
10:09.50Stormkittyoh w8
10:09.50robokittybecause there's always the odds of the UK coming over to reclaim their country
10:09.52Stormkitty2l8
10:10.07Stormkittyrobokitty I think they should. They've proven they can't govern themselves
10:10.23robokittywho, the UK?
10:10.27BundyBlackNet : saying that everyone having a gun is not a good thing, is not the same a fear of firearms
10:10.28Bundyi love guns
10:10.29StormkittyBoth
10:10.32StormkittyUK and US
10:10.36Bundybut im pretty happy with the gun laws where i live
10:10.48BlackNetBundy which is where?
10:10.51BundyDenmark
10:11.48BlackNetonly experience i have with denmarks laws is on hunting. they use this weird energy standards for what rounds you can use.
10:11.52Stormkittyhttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a5/Causes_of_death_by_age_group_%28percent%29.png I'm just gonna leave this here.
10:13.34BlackNetso what that shows is kids 15-24. which would be the street gangs :)
10:13.57BlackNetinteresting to note about teh same graph for the uk but it's knives :)
10:14.05BlackNetyou ban one object they find another object.
10:14.14Bundymhm
10:14.16StormkittyAt least I can defend myself against a knife.
10:14.20StormkittyAgainst a gun, what do I do?
10:14.21Bundyand what would you rather face?
10:14.31Bundya guy with a gun, or a guy with a knife?
10:14.32BlackNetjust like a suicidal person they get what they can find to do the job. if they cant get a firearm then they get pills, a knife or a car
10:14.44Bundyand what has the greatest chance of collateral damage?
10:14.47robokittysomeone armed with a daffodil
10:14.54BlackNetBundy a guy with a gun any day of the week.
10:14.58StormkittyI am not afraid of a guy with a knife. I will fuck his day up.
10:15.10BlackNetit's not the object that makes the person 'armed'
10:15.12BundyBlackNet : and your reasoning behind that?
10:15.22BlackNetit's the skill the weilder has that makes them 'armed'
10:15.26BlackNetlets make no mistake about that
10:15.34StormkittyHe can shoot you before you get close enough to touch him
10:15.35Stormkittythen what
10:15.36Stormkittyyou lay there
10:15.39Stormkittybleeding to death
10:15.41Stormkittylike a jackass
10:15.43robokittybut it sure as hell makes a difference if said person is armed with a 12" shotgun or a bleeding daffodil
10:15.48Bundyits much easier killing a person with a gun than with a knife
10:15.58BlackNetStormkitty you watch way to many movies. you need to get out more and learn how things work in the real world
10:16.04StormkittyI think YOU do.
10:16.25BlackNetStormkitty so tell me the average shooting distance :)
10:16.38Bundythat its probaby point blank
10:16.49StormkittyAverage distance is less than 4 metres
10:16.59Bundystill easier to fend of a knife than a bullet
10:17.44BlackNetyou clearly have never seen a competent blade user
10:18.06Bundyno, but we're not talking a fucking samurai here
10:18.15Bundywe're talking a average dude with either a gun or a knife
10:18.28Stormkittyaverage dude with a knife will use poor technique and poor grip
10:18.40BlackNetso we are talking thugs who have little to no skill in using the object
10:18.48Bundyyes
10:18.51Stormkittyaka average person
10:19.04BlackNetthen it does not matter what they are using in that case as it's all poor skill
10:19.13Stormkittyeasier to kill someone with a gun
10:19.16Stormkittyeven with no skill
10:19.17Bundyooh
10:19.28Bundywhy is that every american ive ever met has been super nice
10:19.36Bundybut on the internet
10:19.39Bundythey are mostly tards?
10:19.40Bundyi dont get it.
10:19.54Stormkittyafraid of getting a real-time punch to the face
10:21.54Bundyoh there was this one cabdriver in SF though
10:21.55Bundyhaha
10:21.59Bundythat was an awesome cabride
10:22.14Bundybrb, gotta get something to eat
10:22.23Stormkittydude I had an argument with a taxi driver over the nature of the universe once
10:22.29StormkittyTalk to taxi drivers. They're awesome.
10:22.54Stormkitty"Olympics are finished but Broadway construction is never finished."
10:49.29*** join/#wowhead faCe| (~face@p5489BB57.dip.t-dialin.net)
10:52.50*** join/#wowhead Anmity (~Anmity@h179n7c1o851.bredband.skanova.com)
11:00.22*** join/#wowhead Alvraen (~Alvie@ip72-220-6-30.sd.sd.cox.net)
11:18.08g0urrawoah.. Faithless split up on friday :<
11:26.43*** join/#wowhead Ward (Ward@ip45-152-209-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl)
11:31.01*** join/#wowhead robokitty (~roboe@50A1B36D.flatrate.dk)
12:15.33IcystormOh!
12:17.05Owkkurig0urra: they had a rather poor concert here a month or two ago
12:17.31g0urraok
12:17.47g0urrarocks out to Stardust - Music Sounds Better with You
12:20.07g0urraone of the best dance tunes of the late 90's
12:26.30*** join/#wowhead Jamash (~Jamash@76.251.85.161)
12:33.01*** join/#wowhead derschnitter (~derschnit@p5B072CA1.dip.t-dialin.net)
12:36.47BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1306.JPG.html
12:39.07Owkkurihttp://macromeme.com/dog/plot-twist-6.html
12:44.14*** join/#wowhead JunkHead (~JunkHead@173-16-69-11.client.mchsi.com)
12:49.36*** join/#wowhead stolenlegacy (~stolenleg@chello213047049072.5.graz.surfer.at)
13:01.07robokittyg0urra, makes sense, given that it was designed to be the ultimate one-hit wonder :P
13:02.06g0urra:V
13:05.00*** join/#wowhead Lopin (~Lopin@ip-78-102-194-108.net.upcbroadband.cz)
13:06.30*** join/#wowhead MaienM (~MaienM-F@unaffiliated/maienm)
13:06.48*** join/#wowhead Ssateneth (Lizard@97-86-34-97.dhcp.stpt.wi.charter.com)
13:12.44*** join/#wowhead Osagasu (~Ilorin@67-197-8-52.rh1.dyn.cm.comporium.net)
13:17.01*** join/#wowhead DasBlub (~DasBlub@218-88.199-178.cust.bluewin.ch)
13:19.47*** join/#wowhead zr (~zr@unaffiliated/zr)
13:21.10*** join/#wowhead sygnous|mbp (~sygnous|m@nat/cisco/x-ndpetgwwxowcrjnm)
13:21.10*** join/#wowhead sygnous|mbp (~sygnous|m@unaffiliated/malikeye)
13:27.59*** join/#wowhead faCe| (~face@p5489BB57.dip.t-dialin.net)
13:41.16*** join/#wowhead Xinhuan (~xinhuan@WoWUIDev/WoWAce/xinhuan)
13:49.29*** join/#wowhead Ressolute (~videodrom@adsl-68-191-103.cha.bellsouth.net)
13:50.01*** join/#wowhead Funkeh` (~funk@5ad4d5e7.bb.sky.com)
13:50.01*** join/#wowhead Funkeh` (~funk@WoWUIDev/WoWAce/Ace3/BigWigs/funkeh)
13:50.59*** join/#wowhead zax (~zax@h193n4-g-va-a12.ias.bredband.telia.com)
13:53.57*** join/#wowhead kadrahil (~kad@unaffiliated/kadrahil)
14:25.32*** join/#wowhead deathadder (~no@ganjaman.gotadsl.co.uk)
14:40.49*** join/#wowhead Demetrious (~Demetriou@invictus.collantes.us)
14:56.22*** join/#wowhead Nechckn_AFK (~N@WoWUIDev/Norganna/Admin/Nechckn)
14:59.12*** join/#wowhead Nechckn (~N@c-68-33-227-144.hsd1.dc.comcast.net)
14:59.14*** join/#wowhead Nechckn (~N@WoWUIDev/Norganna/Admin/Nechckn)
15:09.26*** join/#wowhead xfiler71111 (~xfiler76@c-0fca72d5.05-127-65736b2.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se)
15:15.26*** join/#wowhead Joschasa (~Joschasa@p5799CD07.dip.t-dialin.net)
15:16.09IcystormHow many images does macromeme have?
15:21.52*** join/#wowhead Djtwos (~DJ@cpc11-rdng21-2-0-cust132.15-3.cable.virginmedia.com)
15:23.19*** join/#wowhead zr (~zr@unaffiliated/zr)
15:26.39robokittysteals Djanes kittens and runs off
15:27.53Djaneshakes fist at robo
15:28.08*** join/#wowhead poeticdragon (~PoeticDra@pool-71-189-251-112.lsanca.fios.verizon.net)
15:28.08*** mode/#wowhead [+o poeticdragon] by ChanServ
15:28.59[-jon-]are there any better uses of carnelian than to just vendor them?
15:29.02*** join/#wowhead pompy (~Mike@c-76-116-64-179.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
15:29.07*** join/#wowhead Eraclito (~SD@host90-234-dynamic.54-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it)
15:35.54kadrahileat them
15:40.19[-jon-]im not hungry
15:40.54Demetrious[-jon-]: I am assuming that is a gem, right?
15:51.58StarkieI'm at 65/75 quests for the Nagrand achievement and I can't find any quests, any suggestions?
15:53.50robokittyWowhead profiler or Everyquest
15:54.23kadrahilor Quest Completist
15:54.28*** join/#wowhead Noxy (~Noxy2@rrcs-64-183-226-149.sw.biz.rr.com)
15:54.33*** join/#wowhead Medliwork (~Medlir@adsl-76-247-157-48.dsl.lgtpmi.sbcglobal.net)
15:57.58*** join/#wowhead Yewbacca2 (~C2@h-177-152.A216.priv.bahnhof.se)
15:58.10Lopinmhm, some ideas where to go on level 35 (Alliance :))? :)
16:00.21robokittyGo to Stormwind, look at board
16:00.32*** join/#wowhead JunkHead-Work (~JunkHead@129.sub-174-253-121.myvzw.com)
16:02.00Lopinokay
16:03.16*** join/#wowhead Glar (~Glar@75.103.13.171)
16:03.48*** join/#wowhead g0urra (g0urra@unaffiliated/gourra)
16:16.58*** join/#wowhead Pi_Medi (~chatzilla@adsl-68-91-132-237.dsl.spfdmo.swbell.net)
16:17.02*** join/#wowhead Rixius (~Rixius@208.86.167.249)
16:17.20Pi_Mediany hunters
16:17.42RawsPresumably millions
16:18.10*** part/#wowhead Rixius (~Rixius@208.86.167.249)
16:30.13JunkHead-Workha
16:41.55*** join/#wowhead Clayton__ (~Clayton@CPE0022b0ca6a7e-CM001a6670fc34.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
16:42.54*** join/#wowhead Icystorm (~DarkONI@ppp-94-68-157-139.home.otenet.gr)
16:45.15*** join/#wowhead faCe| (~face@p5489BB57.dip.t-dialin.net)
16:47.49*** join/#wowhead stew-a (~Stewart@unafilliated/stewa/x-008753)
16:48.22*** join/#wowhead Sixen (~Kevin@149-169-115-22.nat.asu.edu)
16:50.31*** join/#wowhead kadrahil (~kad@unaffiliated/kadrahil)
16:52.39*** join/#wowhead kadrahil (~kad@unaffiliated/kadrahil)
17:02.09*** join/#wowhead Primar (~nnscript@5ac3e9b3.bb.sky.com)
17:05.38*** join/#wowhead Mowsey_ (~Mowsey@99-125-182-163.lightspeed.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net)
17:25.08*** join/#wowhead Srosh (~Srosh@d071007.adsl.hansenet.de)
17:26.56*** join/#wowhead Kaso (~Kaso@resnet-nat060.lancs.ac.uk)
17:39.08*** part/#wowhead Sixen (~Kevin@149-169-115-22.nat.asu.edu)
17:39.28*** join/#wowhead vengeurz (~chatzilla@sev93-1-82-229-236-159.fbx.proxad.net)
17:46.11*** join/#wowhead Jamash (~Jamash@adsl-76-251-85-161.dsl.bltnin.sbcglobal.net)
17:51.53*** join/#wowhead Stormkitty (~Blarg@S0106c43dc78eed87.vc.shawcable.net)
17:51.53*** join/#wowhead Stormkitty (~Blarg@unaffiliated/stormscape)
17:54.15*** join/#wowhead zr (~zr@S0106001839a05b57.vc.shawcable.net)
17:54.20*** join/#wowhead zr (~zr@unaffiliated/zr)
18:04.43*** join/#wowhead NightMiles (~nights@pool-173-59-64-30.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
18:08.37DjaneOne of my melee dps guildees just whispered one of the tank guildees
18:08.42Djane"Why didn't you use a shield that go?"
18:08.58DjaneThe tank was using a shield, of course, but the paranoia and doubt is hilarious.
18:13.57winkmore like idiocy
18:14.06winki wouldnt believe anyone :P
18:14.19*** join/#wowhead Izzmo (~IceChat77@adsl-75-39-138-193.dsl.tpkaks.sbcglobal.net)
18:14.32IzzmoAnyone have any ideas on when the content patch will be out?
18:18.29g0urramaybe before the end of the month
18:18.32g0urrabut not soon
18:21.01IzzmoReally? I can't believe it is taking this long...
18:21.27Ac-townand?
18:21.30DjaneWelcome to software patch dates.,
18:21.35Ac-townthey've added a lot of stuff
18:21.43Ac-townand new code = new bugs
18:22.09IzzmoWhat do you mean by added a lot?
18:22.18IzzmoThe major content updates are ZG and ZA right?
18:22.26IzzmoI thought everything else was bug fixes and class updates
18:22.47DjaneIt's dead easy to balance classes.
18:22.48DjaneRight?
18:23.18IzzmoWell, the way Blizzard has set them up, that will be an infinite amount of time to balance
18:24.08DjaneAnd, it's pretty easy to set up a whole new guild recruitment interface, yeah?
18:24.22Izzmoof course!
18:24.23DjaneOh and guild challenges, they only require a few lines of code.
18:24.36IzzmoRelatively speaking :P
18:25.04DjaneOh, and of course moving all BoA's to actually be mailed to different Wow accounts on the same battlenet, including faction, too.
18:25.23IzzmoEh, now that one I have to disagree on
18:25.29IzzmoI don't think that's a big of feat as you might think
18:26.29DjaneYeah, it's only taken them an expansion to implement it.
18:26.30JunkHead-Worki got big feat!
18:26.52DjaneClearly a dead simple change. Otherwise it would of taken longer, right?
18:27.23IzzmoDjane.. where is your credibility on this subject?
18:27.43IzzmoI've been developing software for over 10 years, I know how design and implementation of code rolls out
18:27.49DjaneThat's nice.
18:27.55DjaneMy credibility is I actually read patch notes.
18:27.57IzzmoI'll tell you how it probably went down
18:28.06IzzmoPatch notes mean nothing..
18:28.11DjaneNo, you'll tell me how you believe it went down, in some kind of bullshit pseudo conspiratorial rubbish.
18:28.17DjaneAnd i'll mock you some more, and go back to Raiding.
18:28.25Izzmo.. really?
18:28.30DjaneYup, Nef calls.
18:28.30IzzmoThat's where you want to go?
18:28.33DjaneBbiab.
18:28.42IzzmoYou're an idiot.
18:28.44DemetriousI am listening, Izzmo, don't get discocuraged by the mob.
18:28.49DjaneSometimes, mostly around women.
18:28.56DjaneOr potent spirits.
18:29.23DjaneThat doesn't change the fact that the only reason the patch is taking long is because there's a lot to do.
18:29.39DjaneIf there wasn't a lot to do, they'd release. The delay on releasing is directly proportional to how much they have to work.
18:29.44IzzmoWell, anyways.. software developers, especially at game companies, are very good (usually) at what they do and become highly efficient out turning out code.. so most likely they've had this feature done on their internal builds for some time.
18:30.02DemetriousIzzmo, I tend to agree.
18:30.07IzzmoBy the time some higher up finally got around to looking at it, he didn't like it, and either wanted more or wanted to change it all up.
18:30.18Izzmoback to coders to redesign and retest and reimplement
18:30.26DemetriousFeature creep, being there.
18:30.31Izzmomaybe it goes back and forth for a while before they finally reach an agreement
18:30.47Izzmothen they send it out to customers, which then has to bug test for a while, then they release it
18:31.04IzzmoUnfortunately with such a big platform, it can take features a while to actually get to the PTR.
18:31.06DemetriousYes. Add to that: they do not *need* to push it out.
18:31.10DjaneErr, yes they do.
18:31.15DjaneSince it's the mmo business model.
18:31.20DemetriousThey are receiving income, no matter what.
18:31.24DjaneEvery day they don't release, they lose profit.
18:31.25IzzmoThere is "one" model Djane?
18:31.31DemetriousThey do not *need* to push it out.
18:31.33DjanePretty much.
18:31.37Djaneit's "release" or Lose out.
18:31.42IzzmoNo, it's not that easy.
18:31.58Ac-townIzzmo: you forgot about the guild finder
18:32.03Ac-townand the new random rewards
18:32.21Ac-townand guild challenges
18:32.25IzzmoWell, I was just saying in general, I have no idea how it actually went down, I'm just speculating
18:33.23IzzmoI have no doubt the next patch will be nice for guilds :) Just mad it took so long
18:33.36IzzmoNot mad.. just anxious.
18:33.56hyljeu mad
18:34.45*** join/#wowhead Funkeh` (~funk@5ad4d5e7.bb.sky.com)
18:34.45*** join/#wowhead Funkeh` (~funk@WoWUIDev/WoWAce/Ace3/BigWigs/funkeh)
18:35.17IzzmoI'm so mad I'm going to roll down to Blizzard HQ and blow them up just to make a point.
18:35.55DemetriousNot smart thing to say, thought, albeit as joke.
18:36.12Izzmoyeah, very true lol
18:36.28Izzmosarcasm doesn't come across very well in text.
18:36.40DemetriousAye.
18:39.10*** join/#wowhead Icystorm (~DarkONI@ppp-94-68-189-20.home.otenet.gr)
18:42.11dekaei called homeland security...they laughed at the thought of a limey terrorist and hung up
18:42.26dekaeshrugs
18:42.43Izzmolulz
18:45.01DemetriousRemember Canuks collaborate with HLS, *closely*.
18:45.38dekaeHLS is just using them
18:46.01*** join/#wowhead Jamash (~Jamash@99-92-174-69.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net)
18:57.35*** join/#wowhead Evious (~n_a@s64-180-62-209.bc.hsia.telus.net)
19:00.00DjaneSeal of insight tanking is wierd.
19:06.13[-jon-]why would you use seal of insight anyway
19:08.49DjaneBecause it heals you.
19:09.19Izzmo"For a retarded amount" I might add.
19:09.22[-jon-]I doubt much
19:09.37Djane400k on that fight
19:09.38Izzmotanks shouldn't be able to heal themselves for around 8-10k HPS
19:09.38Djane5min 30
19:10.02[-jon-]how much damage would seal of truth have done?
19:10.08DjaneIrrelevant.
19:10.10DjaneNef isn't a dps check.
19:10.19DjaneAnd threat is roflstomp.
19:10.24*** join/#wowhead Arkaen (~Brett@75.97.33.129.res-cmts.sebh.ptd.net)
19:10.31[-jon-]i have threat problems but maybe our tanks are just bad
19:10.37DjaneI do 40-50k tps.
19:10.43DjaneIn my heavy self healing spec.
19:10.49[-jon-]i dont see why the tank doesnt give me salv before i pull
19:10.59Djanebecause it's useless
19:11.03IzzmoDjane, do you have any exp/hit on u?
19:11.07[-jon-]20% less threat
19:11.10DjaneIzzmo, 5% hit for nef.
19:11.12IzzmoSalv isn't useless..
19:11.13DjaneNo expertise.
19:11.16DjaneIt is on the pull.
19:11.22IzzmoNot really
19:11.23DjaneGlyphed is useful.
19:11.28DjaneUnglyphed, utterly useless.
19:11.32[-jon-]Djane: i stopped glyphing for it
19:11.38IzzmoMost dps like to bring it out at the beginnig of a fight
19:11.41[-jon-]because i would end up pulling after it wore off
19:11.45DjaneThen stop complaining that the tank doesn't salv you.
19:11.48[-jon-]the glyph doesnt erase your threat, just delays it
19:12.05IzzmoMmm, well
19:12.13DjaneUnglyphed salv reduces so little threat when used on the pull that you might as well of rolled druid and cowered.
19:12.17IzzmoYou would hope the tank would have enough TPS by that time
19:12.28[-jon-]the glyph is useless the tank gets his threat up before it wears off
19:12.37[-jon-]i sometimes pull halfway through the fight
19:12.43Djanethen your tank is bad.
19:12.45Izzmowhat is ur class?
19:12.48[-jon-]ret
19:12.52IzzmoAh
19:12.55DjaneMy 25k dpsers can't pull off me.
19:12.58DjaneNot remotely.
19:13.03[-jon-]my gear isnt even that good
19:13.13IzzmoDo u stay 5% all the time Djane?
19:13.17Izzmoor just for nef?
19:13.27[-jon-]Izzmo: you need the interrupt to hit on nef
19:13.29DjaneAll the time, mostly because everything else is faceroll for us right now.
19:13.41[-jon-]is the interrupt cap only 5% and not 8?
19:13.45DjaneYes.
19:13.48DjaneFor level 85 mobs
19:13.56[-jon-]oh right, its not a boss
19:14.07DjaneCome 4.1 i'll be dropping to 0% hit and 10 expertise(glyphed)
19:14.19IzzmoWhy's that?
19:14.20[-jon-]you need to switch seals for that 10 exp
19:14.26[-jon-]Izzmo: interrupts cant miss next patch
19:14.29DjaneThey're taking hit requirements off rebuke.
19:14.36IzzmoPummel for warriors can't miss?
19:14.43DjaneNon damaging interupts.
19:14.44IzzmoI didn't see that in patch notes, hmm
19:15.02IzzmoThat's nice
19:15.05[-jon-]it was in the first patch notes
19:15.09IzzmoI'm sick of warrior tanks have a 12 sec CD too
19:15.37[-jon-]imo prot pallys interrupts are op
19:16.20[-jon-]warriors sorta s uck in that department
19:17.28[-jon-]my guild refuses to let me go ret, its really getting frustrating
19:18.43IzzmoIf you know how to dps in Ret.. paly ret is very good dps imho
19:18.51[-jon-]i do very well
19:18.53Izzmoa lot of ppl still think is sucks though purely because so many people suck at ret
19:19.10[-jon-]my gear is signifigantly worse than everyone else's, and i am still usually #1-2
19:19.32IzzmoWow, niec
19:19.54[-jon-]I have 2 blues, a pvp relic, and tanking bracers.
19:21.18[-jon-]I am going to literally have to say I am going ret or I quit
19:23.15[-jon-]Izzmo: I dont understand how people can suck at ret
19:23.20[-jon-]the rotation is not difficult.
19:24.28IzzmoYeah, I dunno, I'm not a paly lol;
19:24.55[-jon-]there is literally an addon
19:25.01[-jon-]that tells you what button to press for optimal dps
19:25.09DjaneWhich is also quite suboptimal.
19:25.38IzzmoI don't know why ppl would ever use such an addon
19:26.05[-jon-]I use it
19:26.12[-jon-]Djane: Its based on the EJ rotation
19:26.24DjaneRotations don't take into account situational effects.
19:26.26DjaneWhich a good raider will
19:26.32[-jon-]right
19:26.32Djane(i have to move in 7 seconds, therefore i Do X)
19:26.42[-jon-]but it at least helps keeping up inq, etc
19:34.08Gnarfozthat's BS; I challenge you to do more dps than possible by adhering to a properly setup clcinfo
19:34.31Gnarfozif you can't use it and be situationally aware, there's going to be bigger problems anyway
19:35.32Gnarfozit also frees up some of your attention, which leads to higher situational awareness in return
19:35.58[-jon-]just because you use it doesnt mean you have to follow it blindly
19:36.01IzzmoIf you are good at your rotational and have simple key bindings.. then you should be fine without an addon
19:36.07DjaneGnarfoz, my point is.
19:36.14DjaneClc doesn't know if you have to move in 7 seconds.
19:36.18Djaneor maybe 5 seconds.
19:36.20GnarfozIzzmo: there is not rotation
19:36.29[-jon-]Izzmo: its all based on procs really
19:36.35DjaneZealotry stacks fantastic, for instance with wings
19:36.59[-jon-]Djane: I know that is better dps, but it always frustrates me not being able to do an exo proc :(
19:36.59DjaneAnd no addon can factor in raid circumstances with procs.
19:37.02GnarfozDjane: so? name an example of something you would not do or do differently, knowing you would have to move soon
19:37.32[-jon-]you use the addon AND you think about what is coming up!
19:37.43Gnarfozalso, taking into account raid circumstances, at least timer-based ones, would not be hard to implement, really
19:37.46Djanea)burn phases
19:37.58[-jon-]clc doesnt tell you to pop cooldowns
19:38.02Djane(for instance damage vulnerabilities)
19:38.23DjaneNo, it tells you how to manage your procs, which a is easy, b would have you use up your HP when it might be better served holding onto it.
19:38.40[-jon-]so hold on to it
19:38.43DjaneExactly.
19:38.48Djaneclc would tell you to use TV.
19:38.48[-jon-]but you really shouldnt be holding on to it for long
19:38.53DjaneNo, of course not.
19:38.55[-jon-]Djane: that doesnt mean you have to do it
19:39.05DjaneWhat i'm saying is it's suboptimal in many situational situations.
19:39.19Djaneif you don't follow it, why bother in the first place.
19:39.20GnarfozI contest that.
19:39.25[-jon-]you have to turn your monitor on
19:39.31DjaneGnarfoz, you have 3 hp, you're going up onto magmaw to do chains.
19:39.38Gnarfozfollowing it as closely as the situation allows = maximum possible dps output
19:39.38DjaneDo you a)use TV like clcinfo says
19:39.53Gnarfozof course I do TV, the HP would decay while I ride the fucker
19:39.55Djaneb)use something else then popping wings and zealotry on burn phase and leading with a TV.
19:39.58DjaneNo, it wouldn't.
19:40.01Djane(i've tested)
19:40.05[-jon-]unless youre jumping at that point, you probably should use it
19:40.12[-jon-]holy power doesnt decay in combat
19:40.14[-jon-]afaik
19:40.27Gnarfozthen you gained the 3rd HP 1s before you jumped, or something ;)
19:40.30[-jon-]Djane: iirc the burn phase is longer than wings + zealotry
19:40.41Djane[-jon-], of course it is.
19:40.46DjaneThat doesn't change the optimisation of your abilities.
19:40.52[-jon-]yes it does
19:41.02Djane(not to mention you have a higher chance on internal procs coming of the initial attacks due to a period of no damage)
19:41.09Gnarfozand you don't want to save 3HP to start a burn phase with a TV, you want to use those 3HP before popping CDs to refresh Inq, so you don't have to waste HP on it during Zealotry
19:41.20[-jon-]if youre holding 3 hp for more than a few gcds, youre probably doing it wrong
19:41.22DjaneGnarfoz, and had you used that TV, you wouldn't be able to refresh Inq.
19:41.38[-jon-]Gnarfoz: Ive had to refresh inquisition regardless
19:41.40DjaneThank you for proving my point.
19:41.44Gnarfozyou just said something else, now you turn what I said to your side? that's cute
19:41.59DjaneYou just provided a different reason for having HP in that situation.
19:42.07DjaneWhich proved the "you shouldn't use TV like clcinfo says" point.
19:42.11DjaneSo yes, pretty much.
19:42.13[-jon-]Djane: No addon is going to play your character for you. It does help though.
19:42.18Gnarfoz:S
19:42.26DjaneI think it helps, like any buff or proc notifier addon would.
19:42.31DjaneBut following it is not always optimal.
19:42.38Djane95% of the time it is.
19:42.42DjaneIf not even higher.
19:42.46DjaneAnd in some fights, 100%.
19:42.48DjaneBut not always.
19:42.51[-jon-]you need to know when to stray from it
19:43.10DjaneIf you have sufficient knowledge of the class, and an advanced sense of judgement, you will do more dps.
19:43.19Gnarfozso why make your wording "it's suboptimal in many situational situations" when you really want to say "you still need to use your brain"? :P
19:43.21Djane(then if you follow everything it says 100% of the time)
19:43.31DjaneThose two statements are not mutually exclusive.
19:43.31[-jon-]nobody said it was right 100% of the time
19:43.36Gnarfozbrain users do more dps!
19:43.42[-jon-]but that doesnt mean you shouldnt follow it the other 95% of the time
19:43.44DjaneIt is suboptimal in many situational situations.
19:43.56[-jon-]so, use it when it is optimal, otherwise ignore it
19:44.17DjaneAnd here I point out to basic psychologyu.
19:44.35DjaneFollowing an external input device into your decision making process introduces lag.
19:44.56[-jon-]there is a gcd.
19:45.24[-jon-]and clc will tell you 1 gcd ahead, you have plenty of time to think.
19:45.41Djaneby having clcinfo, instead of knowing how to play ret properly, you add a conflicting piece of data into your game. If you are capable of doing all the same things that clcinfo would tell you to do, because -you- know it's the right thing to do, you remove said lag. It's not significant lag, but it's there nonetheless.
19:45.57[-jon-]you are arguing a retarded point
19:46.04DjaneI'm arguing skill > addon.
19:46.14[-jon-]i am arguing skill + addon > addon
19:46.15DjaneYou're right, it is retarded.
19:46.19DjaneThat should be obvious.
19:46.20[-jon-]skill + addon > skill
19:46.32DjaneAddon negatively impacts your skill.
19:46.35Izzmolulz
19:46.40[-jon-]no, you are wrong.
19:46.42DjaneIf you add it into your decision making process, it makes you worse.
19:46.46Djane(assuming equal skill)
19:46.49[-jon-]no, you are wrong.
19:47.04DjaneClcinfo is more advanced than your brain at processing information, is it?
19:47.22Gnarfozit's also perfect at processing information, because it's a computer program.
19:47.39[-jon-]unless the boss has specific mechanics, it is always going to be right.
19:47.40Djaneif only we had some kind of processing capacity that could computate billions of pieces of information, experience and knowledge in a fraction of a nanosecond, somehow.
19:47.52[-jon-]which means you have more focus to avoid other shit, etc
19:47.54Gnarfozand it's faster than you in taking into account procs, mana, gcd, whatever
19:47.58DjaneNo, it isn't.
19:48.00DjaneIt's just easier.
19:48.14[-jon-]its faster
19:48.34DjaneUnless you're running a quantum computer, that would defy the laws of reality.
19:48.40[-jon-]you need to take into account your cooldowns, your mana, your buffs, your procs, and your holy power
19:48.45DjaneWhich isn't that hard.
19:48.46robokittyblows the whistle
19:48.48robokittyright
19:48.48DjaneEspecially for ret.
19:48.54robokittythat's a timeout, go to your corners
19:48.55DjaneOh wait.
19:48.55Gnarfozit would certainly not, because your brain does not work instantaneously either.
19:48.55[-jon-]all at different places on your screen
19:48.57*** join/#wowhead Ressolute (~videodrom@adsl-68-191-103.cha.bellsouth.net)
19:48.58Djaneam i meant to be raidleading? :
19:49.01robokittyyes
19:49.36IzzmoFact: brains have a 4 ms delay
19:49.37[-jon-]a computer can generate the optimal ability faster than your brain.
19:50.04DjaneIzzmo, more accurately, brains have a 4ms delay from information to decision.
19:50.06robokittyyour brain still have to interpret the data from the computer and convert it an action
19:50.17Gnarfozhow can something that quasi-instantly (maximum delay: 1 frame) gives you the result of multiple input datapoints algorithmically not be faster than you manually taking those datapoints in via sensory input, read: seeing, hearing, reading?
19:50.21[-jon-]the addon will calculate it far faster than 4ms.
19:50.48Gnarfoz(I realize reading = seeing, I meant symbols/graphics vs. text)
19:51.05*** join/#wowhead rcfreak0 (~rcfreak0@75-129-147-218.dhcp.fdul.wi.charter.com)
19:51.27[-jon-]It has 16 ms before your sreen even refreshes. probably double that.
19:51.40Gnarfozuhm?
19:51.42Gnarfozso?
19:51.55DjaneNow add in the additional delay created by decision dissonance?
19:52.04Gnarfozthose 16ms apply to your brain, too, because before your screen refreshes, there is no data for you to take in
19:52.07DjaneThat's between 100 and 1500ms, for the average person.
19:52.18[-jon-]rofl
19:52.19DjaneSometimes, sometimes, in exceptional people as little as 75ms
19:52.21[-jon-]1500 ms?
19:52.28[-jon-]do they have downs?
19:52.34DjaneNo, that's the -average- person.
19:52.42DjaneWell, technically.
19:52.47Gnarfozso in the same instant that you can start to take in the data, the addon will already have processed it and displayed the new result (if the result changed)
19:52.56DjaneSince Downs has no scientically noticable alteration of decision making dissonance.
19:53.10[-jon-]Djane is trying to act smart. maybe he took psych 101
19:53.16Gnarfoz...and failed
19:53.43DjaneIt's the same principle as someone walking out in front of your car just as the green light comes on at the traffic light
19:53.54DjaneYou have two opposing instructions to the brain, and you need to process which one takes precident.
19:54.09Gnarfozurrr when my green light goes on, his has been red for 5s+
19:54.19DjaneIrrelevant.
19:54.22[-jon-]you can anticipate any break from the rotation.
19:54.31Gnarfozof course, since it goes contrary to your example. hahaha
19:54.42DjaneIt's irrelevant becuase it's a hypothetical situation.
19:54.46DjaneA well documented one at that.
19:54.56Gnarfozyour hypothetical situation still has to make sense.
19:54.58[-jon-]Djane: what are your qualifications to make these claims?
19:54.59DjaneYou can't ignore the point by saying it shouldn't happen, because whilst right, that doesn't change it from happening.
19:55.22Gnarfozit doesn't happen, lights don't turn green for cars the same instant pedestrian's turn red
19:55.33DjaneIt does happen, because people are dicks and try to run across anyways.
19:55.47Gnarfozwhich is a totally different situation
19:55.58DjaneNo, it isn't. Light turns green, someone walks out in front of you.
19:56.00Gnarfozwhich includes purposefully ignoring the lights
19:56.03[-jon-]I cant believe you are making such a retarded argument
19:56.15[-jon-]someone ignored the light.
19:56.21Gnarfozthere are four lights!
19:56.26DjaneYes, what is relevant is how the brain processes that information.
19:56.32DjaneNot the relative legal standing in it.
19:56.34[-jon-]Djane: what are your qualifications to make these claims?
19:57.20DjaneYou mean, quote conclusions from well documented peer reviewed studies?
19:57.26DjaneI wasn't aware there was a degree in that.
19:57.29[-jon-]I can be good at bullshitting my way out of an argument too.
19:57.30*** join/#wowhead ShinDarth (~shin@host118-110-dynamic.10-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it)
19:57.49[-jon-]throw in some bs science, and a few big words
19:57.53DjaneIn terms of education I'm what you'd call a major in neuroscience, specialising in psyiological somatism in relation to trauma.
19:58.02DjaneNot that that matters anything in an internet debate.
19:58.09Djanephysio*
19:58.27Gnarfozhis question is a valid one, since you seem to be referencing, if not quoting stuff, but citing no sources. so either you're some prodigy on this (and hence, have qualifications) or you have sources. or you're full of it. :)
19:58.50DjaneMy sources are sitting in a pile of textbooks and magazines.
19:58.56Gnarfozfor a change, alternative 2 seems to apply, hehe.
19:59.00[-jon-]my sources are sitting on the internet
19:59.09[-jon-]does that make them valid?
19:59.16DjaneIf it's true, yes.
19:59.23*** join/#wowhead deek| (deek@cpe-75-85-213-93.dc.res.rr.com)
19:59.28DjaneI have a question.
19:59.34Djaneare you ok with the idea of decision dissonance?
19:59.45[-jon-]your argument is wrong.
19:59.55[-jon-]no matter how mayn big words you throw out there
20:00.02DjaneCan you accept that two pieces of information coming in close together, with opposing directions of purpose will create a dissonance in decision making processes?
20:01.16*** join/#wowhead Judicata (186a35aa@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.106.53.170)
20:01.23JudicataG'Afternoonall
20:01.34fewynBIG WORDS
20:01.39Gnarfozsmall words
20:01.39fewynMAKE BRAIN HURT
20:01.52fewynFEWYN MUST SMASH BIG WORDS
20:01.59DjaneFEWYNSMASH.
20:02.10JudicataG' Afternoon All
20:02.13Judicata;P
20:02.50GnarfozDjane: being suggested by an addon "do X" and your situation awareness suggesting "maybe better do Y" is not really such a drastic situation, though. it's more like having two alternatives and picking the better one. it's not like you're under pressure to decide
20:02.56Gnarfoz*situational
20:03.37Juippisplay without addons to train your situational awareness even better
20:03.47DjaneGnarfoz, that would be true if the brain acted under computational logic.
20:04.11DjaneBut the brain chooses via exclusion rather than parallel logic.
20:04.24[-jon-]regardless
20:04.25DjaneDoing a must exclude b, and doing b must exclude a.
20:04.29[-jon-]as long as you choose before the next gcd
20:04.29Gnarfozuhm
20:04.33[-jon-]it does not make a difference. at all.
20:04.39Gnarfozso you're saying the brain is not capable of compromise.
20:05.01Juippisduring the moment of decision it's not
20:05.05Djane^
20:05.16Gnarfozwhich is obviously not true, or must be rendered as "but you could also do C which exludes both a and b"
20:05.20DjaneYou cannot hold two mutually exclusive thoughts simultaniously.
20:05.27DjaneYes, of course.
20:05.36DjaneThere are an infinite numbers of You could also do N
20:05.57JudicataYou are hurting my brain
20:06.07Gnarfozso how is this in any way a restriction on the brain's decision making?
20:06.25Gnarfozyou can still pick the best solution out of many, regardless of conflicts
20:06.32Gnarfozno matter how you got there
20:06.43DjaneIt's not a restriction. The principle of decision dissonance states that the more opposing variables are within the matrix, the greater the delay in resolving said matrix.
20:06.51Gnarfozand as you so neatly pointed out earlier, the brain is exceedingly good at this
20:06.52DjaneIf you have 10 choices, all of which are different
20:06.58DjaneIt would take considerably longer than 5.
20:07.07DjaneThe more different the decisions, the longer, the more, the longer.
20:07.24DjaneNow, if you have information source a: Clcinfo that tells you to do crusader strike
20:07.49Juippiswait what are you arguing over an addon which tells you what to press next?
20:07.51Juippisfuck off
20:07.56DjaneJuippis, that he is.
20:08.01GnarfozI am? you are!
20:08.06DjaneI'm arguing against them.
20:08.09Gnarfozwe're just arguing you're full of it :P
20:08.17DjaneOr rather, stating that you can get better results without using them.
20:08.39[-jon-]do you use DBM? or any addons?
20:08.43[-jon-]that might cause confusion
20:08.47DjaneYes, it might.
20:08.58DjaneI actually run my own timers.
20:09.04[-jon-]what if your timers are wrong
20:09.08DjaneThen I have to compensate.
20:09.12Gnarfozyou run your timers IN YOUR MIND
20:09.15Djaneand adjust on the fly.
20:09.16[-jon-]then stop using timers
20:09.18Gnarfozotherwise they'd be conflicting
20:09.19DjaneGnarfoz, some, not all.
20:09.21Gnarfozdurrrr
20:09.28Djane[-jon-], and?
20:09.30DjaneIt's not that hard.
20:09.44[-jon-]but its hard if the button says crusader strike and you dont want to?
20:09.55DjaneI never said it was hard.
20:10.02[-jon-]Djane is arguing just to argue
20:10.03[-jon-]fuck you
20:10.03DjaneIt's suboptimal to introduce a conflicting piece of information.
20:10.06Gnarfozface it, you might be a good neuroscientist some day, but everyone using clcinfo will still do more dps than you following your theory of "less 'conflicting' info is more dps"
20:10.19DjaneAssuming equal skill, it is.
20:10.21Juippis>everyone
20:10.22Juippishehe
20:10.33DjaneAssuming you have the capacity to hold the information about your class in your mind, it is.
20:10.43[-jon-]plus all of the variables
20:10.46DjaneIf you don't have the ability, skill or inclination to hold that information, or train that muscle memory(depending on class)
20:10.48[-jon-]which you cant hold in your mind
20:10.53DjaneThen yes, clc will be better.
20:10.57*** join/#wowhead Judicata_ (186a35aa@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.106.53.170)
20:11.13Gnarfozthere is no muscle memory involved in a proc based skill priority list
20:11.20DjaneNo, which is why I said depending on class.
20:11.22Gnarfozthere is no set rotation to follow
20:11.23[-jon-]skill + addon > skill = addon
20:11.25Gnarfozalright
20:11.29DjaneIt's almost as if I quantified that.
20:11.37Djane[-jon-], let me put that right for you.
20:11.57DjaneHigh enough level of skill  > high enough level of skill + addon > average skill + addon > skill
20:11.59Gnarfozlet's turn this in another direction. would having two brains improve the situation?
20:12.04DjaneProbably not.
20:12.10[-jon-]Gnarfoz: no, conflicting information
20:12.14Gnarfozconflicting brains!
20:12.17DjaneYes.
20:12.30DjaneWhich is also a relatively well documented set of phenomina.
20:12.41[-jon-]Djane got an A+ in bullshitting
20:12.46DjaneSome brain damage can cause what's known as colloqually as split brain syndrome.
20:12.59DjaneWhere the right half and left half fight over decision making processes.
20:13.17DjaneThere's some sensationalised bullshit around it, but it's mostly accurate in principle, if not practise.
20:13.23GnarfozI've got enough split brain syndrome to handle at work, when a cluster node disconnects ;\
20:13.52Judicata_So....I feel left out as a wow nerd by not having a computer job :/
20:14.08Gnarfozbeing a wow nerd does not qualify you for one
20:14.14DjaneThe whole point I was making is If you're good enough to be able to react within that 1 gcd jon keeps pointing out optimally, an addon that provides the same information but cannot account for situational instances will negatively impact your dps.
20:14.17[-jon-]at least you have a job?
20:14.46DjaneIf you're unable to come to the same conclusions clc does those 95-99% of the times then yeah, clc would be an increase for you.
20:14.50Juippisalso wtf kind of nickname is [-jon-]
20:15.01GnarfozDjane: and we're saying: you will be slower at processing the information required to react within that timeframe. hence, use an addon that speeds this up
20:15.02[-jon-]this is fucking freenode
20:15.02Juippiscubes and walls
20:15.37DjaneGnarfoz, the average human being is more than adequate in processing that information quick enough by an order of magnitude or so.
20:15.40JuippisGnarfoz: how does it work? Does it give you like a popup which tells you what to press next?
20:15.44JuippisI hate popups in my screen
20:15.55[-jon-]Juippis: it has a little icon
20:15.56Gnarfozit's not a popup, it's constantly there
20:16.03[-jon-]two, one for the current, and one for the next
20:16.05DjaneThe one advantage clc will always have is in compensating for lag.
20:16.09Juippislike forte?
20:16.14Gnarfozforte has nothing to do with it
20:16.24Juippisbut is it similar?
20:16.29DjaneJuippis, it is, to you, yes.
20:16.31GnarfozI don't think so
20:16.42Gnarfozit is similar in that both are addons. that is basically all
20:16.43[-jon-]Juippis: http://media.curse.com/Curse.Projects.ProjectImages/20386/16808/clcret_frame_bf.jpg
20:16.50DjaneGnarfoz, i'll elaborate on my point above.
20:17.05DjaneI assume you use forte to give you the information in one place to help you decide what your next gcd should be?
20:17.10Djane@Juippis.
20:17.25Juippismm yea I guess that was the point
20:17.32DjaneThen yes, clc just does that for you.
20:17.37JuippisI tried forte during wotlk when cata patch hit and all classes got RNGd
20:17.41Juippisand I hated it
20:17.44GnarfozDjane: uhm, you're saying that having, at the same time!, available to you: a fully finished decision, presented to you as clcinfo's "do this next" icon; and: a visual indicator for a proc, maybe a sound playing... that the latter, which still requires processing by your brain, is going to be faster?
20:18.02[-jon-]Juippis: clc will take procs in to account
20:18.19BlackNeti hate allergies :(
20:18.21DjaneGnarfoz, two things.
20:18.23Juippisbut blizzards default UI does it too pretty well
20:18.25Juippisso it's good
20:18.34Djanea)the human mind, if it has access to all the information at the same time as clc, will do it faster, yes.
20:18.42Juippisthose kinds of addons are useless bling bling
20:18.43[-jon-]the default ui doesnt do anything with inquisition
20:18.55[-jon-]besides having to stare at the small buff icon
20:19.02Djaneb)the human mind can do it in around 1/10th[average approx]  of the time needed,
20:19.05DjaneIt's not about faster.
20:19.09DjaneIt's about collision of data.
20:19.32GnarfozDjane: but you can't assume that. given how WoW's addon system works, clcinfo will always be already done calculating at the same time that you get to see the information it used for its calculation.
20:19.41BlackNetwhat is clc
20:19.45DjaneNo, you can't, thus as I stated above.
20:20.01Gnarfozso why are you arguing an impossible situation?
20:20.03Djane<Djane> The one advantage clc will always have is in compensating for lag.
20:20.10Gnarfozthe mind can never be faster, clcinfo will always already be done
20:20.14Gnarfozit has nothing to do with lag
20:20.14DjaneIrrelevant.
20:20.19DjaneIt's not about faster, it's about optimisation.
20:20.29Juippisa-ha!
20:20.30[-jon-]Gnarfoz: It also takes into account the next move. ie. you have 2 holy power and you are doing a cursder strike. you will have 3 holy power then, so do X
20:20.31DjaneIf you have 1 second to make your decision, and clc takes 0.04 seconds, and the mind takes 0.1 seconds
20:20.33JuippisI know where this is going now
20:20.49Gnarfozoptimize this: A is done at second 0, B is done at second 0 + brain processing time. which is optimal? A, not B
20:21.01GnarfozJuippis: shitville
20:21.11DjaneGnarfoz, you're neglecting to consider that the brain STILL has to process the information from clcinfo
20:21.14[-jon-]FUCK
20:21.22[-jon-]I set a way too low bid price and one of my ingots sold for 100g :(
20:21.24DjaneWhich takes the same amount of time as to derive the solution itself, more or less.
20:21.27GnarfozDjane: that information is a lot simpler than the other info, though.
20:21.38Juippisnot necessarily
20:21.39DjaneNot really.
20:21.49Djaneor rather.
20:21.57DjaneWhen the brain handles about a trillion pieces of information a second.
20:21.59Gnarfozand: I contest that it takes the same amount of time to see "do X" and understand this, than it takes to take in all new circumnstances and come to the same (or another, better) conclusion
20:22.04DjaneWhether it comes in 10 bits or 100 bits, is kind of irrelevant.
20:22.22[-jon-]you have to take in information all over your screen as well
20:22.24[-jon-]its not in one place
20:22.31[-jon-]you have to look at like 5 different things
20:22.37Gnarfozand the best thing is: neither of us can prove the other wrong without relying on non-problem-specific data
20:22.39DjaneIf you have a default or poor ui, yes.
20:22.53[-jon-]well, what else are you going to compare it to other than stock?
20:23.10DjaneThe vast majority of raiders will have data information gathering addons of one form or another
20:23.19Gnarfozclcinfo is one of them...
20:23.29DjaneA part of clcinfo is one of them, yes.
20:23.33BlackNetso clc is a power aura spinoff?
20:23.35[-jon-]Gnarfoz: give up
20:23.37[-jon-]you cant fix stupid
20:23.40GnarfozBlackNet: no.
20:23.48BlackNet[-jon-] you can fix stupid. you can replace it
20:23.50DjaneIf you just used clcinfo as a proc addon, it would have no problems.
20:24.08BlackNetMain purpose of the addon is to help the user easily track various cooldowns/auras/procs.
20:24.17BlackNetsounds like power auras
20:24.24Gnarfozit would have *the same* problem you claim it has, unless it supresses the original info
20:24.34GnarfozBlackNet: main purpose is not that. that's secondary.
20:24.40DjaneGnarfoz, not at all.
20:24.53DjaneIf you have an addon that notifies you when shortbuff A procs.
20:24.54*** join/#wowhead yarddog (~yarddog@70.88.160.150)
20:24.56BlackNetthen what is the main purpose
20:25.03DjaneAnd an addon that tells you to press X when shortbuff A procs.
20:25.14DjaneSituation 1 gives you a piece of information, a variable in the decision making process.
20:25.18Gnarfozmain purpose is to use its advanced features to make it tell you what button to press next, BlackNet
20:25.22DjaneSituation 2 gives you a weighted conclusion to the decision making process.
20:25.27DjaneSit 1 is -always- useful.
20:25.35DjaneSit 2 can conflict due to its conclusional nature.
20:25.59Gnarfozsit2 allow me to skip sit1 and weigh sit2 against whatever my mind came up with, itself
20:26.02[-jon-]I dont care what your books say. You are wrong.
20:26.06DjaneNo, it doesn't.
20:26.09DjaneThat's not how brains work.
20:26.15Gnarfoz...
20:26.19DjaneSit2 competes against what your mind comes up with.
20:26.26DjaneWhich means your mind must eliminate one of them.
20:26.29Gnarfozso?
20:26.31Djane(which is decisional dissonance)
20:26.38Gnarfozthat is not a problem.
20:26.45DjaneAnd the average delay on that kind of disssonance, for this kind of situation is between 150-1500ms
20:27.01Gnarfozthere is not proc display addon saying "you should get the fuck out of where you're standing!!"
20:27.14Gnarfozhence no "sit1" that applies for situational awareness
20:27.23DjaneExcept your senses.
20:27.37Juippis<PROTECTED>
20:27.40Juippiswell presented argument!
20:27.42Gnarfozindeed, and since they can't be embodied in an addon, your point is rather moot
20:27.44Djanethis isn't even getting into situational paralysis.
20:27.57BlackNeteveryone see the shots i took this am?
20:27.58Gnarfozthat's just when you're overwhelmed
20:28.06BlackNethttp://wetlands.simplyaquatics.com/v/3409+idle+hour/IMG_1309.JPG.html
20:28.07Gnarfozthis am?
20:28.12BlackNetthis morning
20:28.14DjaneNo, situational paralysis is a defined term.
20:28.22Gnarfoz"this am" is not possible :<
20:28.36BlackNetconsidering it's pm i can say this am :)
20:28.38DjaneIts where the brain can't decide between opposing conclusions due to too equal sides, or various other conclusions.
20:28.42BlackNetas in the past
20:28.48GnarfozBlackNet: unless you know what those terms mean :F
20:28.56BlackNetam as in morning :)
20:29.03Gnarfoz"am" doesn't stand for morning.
20:29.03BlackNetthought everyone knew what that ment
20:29.33Gnarfozit's bad enough the US is still stuck with 12-hour time, hehe
20:29.46BlackNetwhatthefuckever dude
20:29.53Judicata_^Djane, that's why I'm of the branch of thought that implores the use of a simple UI with clear and precise aural and visual stimuli that provides somesort of info.
20:30.21DjaneJudicata_, I tend to agree.
20:30.38DjaneGnarfoz, am and pm are universally understood.
20:30.48Gnarfozor you could just suppress ALL those stimuli, let clcinfo do the thinking and then just "exclude" whether you want to do waht clcinfo says or what your surroundings (i.e. 3d stuff, your position, etc, things you can't suppress) dictate.
20:30.54Djaneno, you can't.
20:30.58Juippisyeah I understood that but it's a good way to troll americans
20:31.00GnarfozDjane: if by "universally" you mean "the US", then I agree
20:31.02DjaneUnless you're a robot.
20:31.10DjaneGnarfoz, england, europe, africa, australia, china.
20:31.13DjaneJapan too.
20:31.17DjaneThose are the places I know personally.
20:31.21GnarfozDjane: you're pulling that out of your ass.
20:31.29Djanealso, this is the internet.
20:31.30Izzmolikes hot dogs
20:31.34DjaneSo you have cultural diffusion.
20:31.37DjaneAnyways.
20:31.38GnarfozI'm in germany, which is certainly in Europe, and nobody would assume "this am" means "this morning" :p
20:31.39BlackNetGnarfoz no he's not, so get over it
20:31.47Djane<Gnarfoz> or you could just suppress ALL those stimuli, let clcinfo do the thinking and then just "exclude" whether you want to do waht clcinfo says or what your surroundings (i.e. 3d stuff, your position, etc, things you can't suppress) dictate.
20:31.51DjaneThat is not how brains work.
20:31.56DjaneThat is not how decision making works.
20:32.00Gnarfozthat's how wow can work, nothing to do with my brain
20:32.02IzzmoOMG YOU GUYS ARE STILL TALKING ABOUT CLCINFO HOLY SHIT
20:32.02DjaneThat is not how you think.
20:32.05IzzmoIt's been like an hour
20:32.10[-jon-]Gnarfoz: Give up. he's going to use that excuse until you stop arguing with him.
20:32.10DjaneWelcome to the internet.
20:32.15BlackNetdoes clcinfo have a wetwire to the brain or something?
20:32.22DjaneYou cannot supress stimuli.
20:32.23GnarfozIzzmo: is your attention span too short? if so, follow BlackNet into the land if ignorant bliss
20:32.31Izzmolol
20:32.33IzzmoI was playing SC2
20:32.36GnarfozDjane: I can suppress wow displaying the stimuli, and they're gone.
20:32.42*** part/#wowhead Glar (~Glar@75.103.13.171)
20:32.50DjaneNo, you cannot.
20:32.53Gnarfozif you claim otherwise, you're contradicting reality.
20:33.04Gnarfozso you say I can't disable proc displays, buff displays?
20:33.14Gnarfozwhy must you insist that I cannot do which I can obviously do?
20:33.15Djanetilts head.
20:33.18Judicata_Not through your brain you can't
20:33.23BlackNethands out mydol
20:33.27Djanenot through your brain, no. Through an external function, yes.
20:33.28GnarfozJudicata_: nobody claimed that
20:33.33DjaneIf the stimuli exists, you cannot ignore it.
20:33.37Gnarfoz...
20:33.40Gnarfozwhat the FUCK.
20:33.54Gnarfozhow can you be so bone headed?
20:34.05DjaneThe stimuli in question is the clc "press this next".
20:34.07Judicata_So you're arguing to disable everything and just follow what clc states?
20:34.19Ac-townclc?
20:34.19DjaneIf you disable that, I have no problems.
20:34.21Gnarfozthe only way to know what procs and buffs are in play would be to reverse-engineer clcinfo's decision making process in my mind
20:34.28Gnarfozwhy the fuck would my mind bother with that
20:34.32DjaneOr display the information appropriately.
20:34.38Djanebecause it's -really- not that complicated.
20:34.40GnarfozJudicata_: almost that.
20:34.41BlackNetit's a game, who cares?
20:34.49Judicata_That takes the game out of it really
20:34.49GnarfozBlackNet: we do, obviously, go back to making knives ;)
20:34.52IzzmoOh shit.. BlackNet pulled out the "It's a game"
20:35.03Judicata_]And I don't think it would improve dps with any appreciable amount.
20:35.07IzzmoBlackNet.. you just lost.
20:35.07Gnarfoznext up: the "get a life" card
20:35.09DjaneGnarfoz, the logic clcinfo uses is really not that hard to follow.
20:35.20BlackNetand the game is loosing subscribers like the titanic taking on water
20:35.29IzzmoBlackNet, u know this how?
20:35.29[-jon-]no its not
20:35.33Ac-townwow losing people?
20:35.34Gnarfozbecause he just thought it up.
20:35.38Ac-townI haven't seen it that much
20:35.50IzzmoThe day Blizz closes a server is the day I'll believe u.
20:35.55DjaneGnarfoz, a real stretch of the brain would be to manually calculate combustion values for fire mages.
20:35.55Ac-townthere is the normal burn out
20:36.13Djanebecause then you're looking at mulptiple five digit additions every fraction of a second.
20:36.14[-jon-]rift is new and shiny
20:36.19DjaneThat's just not doable for most people.
20:36.33Ac-townI've seen people come back from rift allready
20:36.40GnarfozDjane: my point is: if I suppress all the input clcinfo uses (which I can do, don't claim otherwise), then I can have a situation where I just have to weigh those circumstances I can not suppress (which clcinfo doesn't take into account anyweay) against clcinfo's suggestion. this works according to your claims.
20:36.40Djaneclc's calculations though are dressed up in a lot of pretty math, but the actual mechanics are simple.
20:36.43Judicata_The rift story line is really depressing :/
20:36.54Djanereads.
20:36.56[-jon-]Ac-town: it's new. look at warhammer, APB, what were the others?
20:37.04DjaneYou can disable the input clcinfo uses, not suppress.
20:37.05Ac-town[-jon-]: Yeah
20:37.09DjaneWhich I agree with.
20:37.12Gnarfozwhat.
20:37.13Ac-townI can understand people wanting to try it cause its new
20:37.17DjaneYou can turn that stimuli off
20:37.24Gnarfozdisabling would mean it's not available to clcinfo in the first place.
20:37.26DjaneBut you can't suppress, Suppress would mean they exist, and you ignore it.
20:37.39DjaneYou can disable them in terms of your experience of them.
20:37.44Djaneremove them from your screen, etc.
20:38.07DjaneBut you can't actually stop your brain from intaking the stimulus if it has experience of them./
20:38.11Gnarfozif you're going to argue that, because clcinfo used them to come to a conclusion, I would inevitably know they were in play, and hence couldn't do anything BUT try to reverse-engineer them from clcinfo's result, then you're simply nuts. why would I want to spend time on that?
20:38.24DjaneYou're not understanding my point there.
20:38.34Gnarfozprobably because it's bordering on insanity.
20:38.35Gnarfoz:D
20:38.37DjaneWhat i'm saying is, if you remove the input clc uses from your perception of the world.
20:38.45DjaneSo don't show them on the screen, but let clc do it.
20:38.48DjaneThat's fine.
20:38.52Gnarfozthat's what I am saying
20:38.58Gnarfozand that's what I can technically achieve
20:38.59DjaneYes, you're using the wrong terminology.
20:39.17[-jon-]your brain cannot process all of the information it receives.
20:39.23Djane[-jon-], incorrect.
20:39.31Gnarfoznot... really, unless you mistook my "supress" as anything else than "not displaying/playing sound in game"
20:39.33DjaneYour conscious mind cannot conceive all the information it receives.
20:39.42BlackNetpsychology tells us we process more info that we are conscious of.
20:39.49BlackNetlike patterns on the ceiling and floor
20:39.54Gnarfozyou're hearing voices, BlackNet
20:39.56DjaneGnarfoz, supress means to push down in terms of your unconscious awareness of data.
20:40.03Gnarfozyeah, in your corner of the world.
20:40.07Djanei.e attempting to become unaware of something
20:40.24Gnarfozif I make them invisible in the game client, then they're still there, not disabled, but suppressed. words have more than one application.
20:40.48DjaneSupress is the wrong word if you're talking about the brain, in this instance.
20:40.56GnarfozI'm not talking about the brain.
20:40.57Djane(and I really wish I knew if it had one p or two)
20:41.04GnarfozI'm talking about visual and aural effects in the game.
20:41.13Gnarfozsuppress, two p
20:41.17DjaneThanks.
20:41.18DjaneEither way
20:41.20DjaneTerminology aside.
20:41.24DjaneI'll continue
20:41.26GnarfozTerminators aside!
20:41.37Djaneremoving clc's input data from your experience, but allowing it to use it. Yes. I agree with that.
20:41.52GnarfozI shall make that my goal for... some day.
20:42.03DjaneThen you have a situation where you weigh those circumstances(which you're quite correct in stating clc cannot account for)
20:42.06Gnarfozuntil then, I'll continue wasting reaction time because of decision making dissonance
20:42.20DjaneThe error in your comment is in this next statement though
20:42.36Gnarfozis obviously superhuman with decision making time below the average!
20:42.37*** join/#wowhead sygnous|mbp (~sygnous|m@nat/cisco/x-gbfsetrkxbgtnjur)
20:42.37*** join/#wowhead sygnous|mbp (~sygnous|m@unaffiliated/malikeye)
20:42.45Djane"where I just have to weigh those circumstances against clcinfo's suggestion. this works according to your claims."
20:42.51DjaneIt's not so much weigh against.
20:42.56DjaneAs decide via exclusion.
20:42.57Gnarfozwell, exclude either
20:43.01DjaneYup.
20:43.08Gnarfozwhat else is weighing one thing against another?
20:43.17Gnarfoza or b must win
20:43.23DjaneDepends on contxt.
20:43.27Gnarfozit's not like I'm flipping a coin
20:43.28DjaneYou can also consider relative worths.
20:43.41Djane(which is slightly different on mostly a semantic level)
20:43.58Djanethen you're adding personal preference into your decision making process.
20:43.58*** join/#wowhead Sephiroth (Sephiroth@unaffiliated/sephiroth)
20:43.58Gnarfozweighing is considering "relative worth", is it not
20:44.06DjaneNah
20:44.09DjaneNot inherently
20:44.15Gnarfozit's not like I can prevent that, humans aren't objective
20:44.22DjaneBut it's a meaningless semantice aside in terms of this discussion.
20:44.25Djane-e
20:44.47DjaneSo yes, your statement is true enough.
20:44.58DjaneThe point I was making is that that weighing against can actually take a lot of time.
20:45.06Gnarfoz(also, while we're at semantics, I should point out that I'm not a native english speaker. I cannot exclude the possibility of me chosing the wrong words for something.^^)
20:45.14DjaneThat's good to know.
20:45.33DjaneSo assuming a)you could do everything clc could do, the 95% of the time there is no conflict of conclusion b)you were aware enough to do the right thing anyways
20:45.44Djaneby eliminating the decisional dissonance, you actually increase your dps.
20:45.58DjaneAs you a)eliminate a source of situational paralysis and b)remove lag in those 5% of times.
20:48.10Gnarfozhyptothetically, having taken in all you said by now, I could agree. however, I would posit that that "lag" (this would actually be "brain lag", wouldn't it?) would not be serious enough to make a difference in the end.
20:48.16Gnarfoz*hypothetically
20:48.18Djanenods
20:48.27DjaneWhere I state that lag is between 150 and 1500ms
20:48.32Djane(where the upper range does cause issues)
20:48.49Gnarfozso basically, this is what separates good and bad players (in terms of reaction time)
20:48.55DjaneYes.
20:49.03DjaneExamples would include things like
20:49.15DjaneThe healer who takes a second to move out of fire because they're not sure if they should finish the heal they're in or move.
20:49.41Gnarfozomg omg FIRE and pyroblast proc and nearly out of mana and raid leader saying something on VoIP... WHAT DO I DOOOO *SPLERG*
20:49.51DjaneYeah
20:50.04Gnarfozcuriously, I seldomly have trouble handling those situations.
20:50.06DjaneMost people, most of the time tend around the 150-200ms range
20:50.16Djanesome people are better at it, and average around 75-100ms
20:50.29DjaneBut some people, some of the time spike past a second.
20:50.49Djaneit's also something that's reduced by practise.
20:50.56Judicata_I had one of those healing issues the other day
20:51.06DjaneIt's often why tanks are better at moving out of fire than any other role.
20:51.09Judicata_Alt healer has half the haste of main healer....bad things happened
20:51.15DjaneAnd why healers know much more about range than anyone else.
20:51.57[-jon-]I dont knwo why everyone tries to portray tanking as so difficult
20:52.54DjaneWho portrays it as difficult?
20:52.59DjaneFalse syllogism.
20:53.19[-jon-]the community in general
20:53.20DjanePeople see a lot of bad tanks and thus assume it has a higher skill threshold than other roles, which is most certainly untrue.
20:53.56[-jon-]its just that terrible tanks dont blend in
20:54.26DjaneBad tanks cause more issues than bad dps.
20:54.26DjaneBad healers cause more issues than bad dps but less than bad tanks.
20:54.30DjaneUnless you're a priest, because.
20:54.35DjaneWhilst everyone else can't heal stupid.
20:54.36DjaneThey can.
20:54.38[-jon-]a bad healer in 10 man can be just as bad
20:54.41[-jon-]if there are only 2
20:54.59[-jon-]priest healing is fine.
20:55.04Judicata_Two healers in a 10man can chalk some issues at time to bad luck as well.
20:55.06DjaneYou missed the joke.
20:55.10DjaneYes.
20:55.12DjaneWe 2 heal cho'gall.
20:55.19[-jon-]it sucks
20:55.25DjaneAnd if both healers get MC'd just as the fire buff hits the main tank, JUST after the other tank kited the add.
20:55.29DjaneJust as the adds are spawning.
20:55.38Djane9/10 times you're ok.
20:55.39DjaneBut sometimes.
20:55.42DjaneVery sometimes.
20:55.42Djaneow.
20:55.51[-jon-]the tank will dip but should survive
20:55.52*** join/#wowhead sygnous|mbp (~sygnous|m@unaffiliated/malikeye)
20:55.55Judicata_I have done cho'gall two man, but at times stuff is just annoying
20:55.56*** join/#wowhead Arkaen (~Brett@75.97.33.129.res-cmts.sebh.ptd.net)
20:56.12[-jon-]we dont follow the add tank, its just sucky due to range
20:56.18DjaneGnarfoz, the key to decisional dissonance is to reduce as many external conclusional factors as possible.
20:56.26GnarfozI'm the tank, I get the healers out of the MC ^^
20:56.29[-jon-]beacon the add tank and he is on his own
20:56.30DjaneYes <3
20:56.35[-jon-]if he gets the 25% debuff, bubble.
20:56.37DjaneAvengers shield > all.
20:56.43Gnarfozindeed
20:56.53DjaneI get about 80% of our interupts on that fight.
20:56.55Gnarfozexcept at fight start, where there's a ghoul army and shaman wolves around
20:57.05DjaneAhh
20:57.07DjaneWe has no dk.
20:57.23Gnarfozif I don't aim properly, I might even hit NO player at all, thanks to way too many targets.
20:57.29DjaneUnf.
20:57.30*** join/#wowhead VCH (~chatzilla@ool-18be77ff.dyn.optonline.net)
20:57.42[-jon-]a good number of ours are broken by MC
20:57.47[-jon-]the ones that arent are usually got by the fire mage
20:57.59Gnarfozbroken by MC? you mean something else
20:58.04[-jon-]err
20:58.05[-jon-]AS
20:58.10Gnarfozright
20:58.40[-jon-]i still hate that fight
20:58.43[-jon-]it is not fun to heal at all
20:59.00Gnarfoz*shrug*, there's worse stuff
20:59.10[-jon-]nef sucks
20:59.14Gnarfozfor example
20:59.18[-jon-]i dont like healing
20:59.27[-jon-]i heard 25 mans are a lot more fun though
21:00.39[-jon-]healing in 10m is not competitive enough for me
21:00.41DjaneEntirely personal.
21:00.44Djane"competetive"
21:00.47DjaneIt is what you make it.
21:01.15DjaneHealing is the wrong role if you want competition.
21:01.17ZiconHrm. If you think healing is a competitive sport, you may be doing it wrong...
21:01.22DjaneYes <3
21:01.24[-jon-]thats why I dont like it
21:02.04*** join/#wowhead Izzmo (~IceChat77@adsl-75-39-138-193.dsl.tpkaks.sbcglobal.net)
21:02.04[-jon-]but i am forced into it still
21:02.22Judicata_Wahooo!!!! There was a murder in my jurisdiction!
21:02.40Izzmowhat?
21:03.01Judicata_Looks like I get to work on a murder prosecution!
21:03.10DjaneYay for you!
21:03.11DjaneI think...
21:03.16[-jon-]if you catch them
21:03.24Djane(sidenote: That's a pretty creepy thing to say :P)
21:03.26Judicata_He is caught
21:03.37Judicata_It's in a rural area, there are no secrets there
21:03.45Izzmolol, riiight
21:03.49Judicata_^ Djane....my career depends on big cases, so it's good for me.
21:03.50Izzmothey are all aliens, you know?
21:04.01Judicata_all aliens?
21:04.44IzzmoAll of them.
21:05.11Judicata_Impersonal pronouns do no good here, who are 'them'
21:06.03GnarfozTHEY are aliens
21:06.16Gnarfozusing impersonal pronouns is part of the deal here.
21:06.43Judicata_Ohhhh okay. Makes 'them' sound much more sinister forsure.
21:07.43Gnarfozand you could be one of them!
21:07.52Gnarfoz(for just 3.99.)
21:08.26Judicata_I'm so glad my shaman isn't an alien any more
21:13.49*** part/#wowhead Izzmo (~IceChat77@adsl-75-39-138-193.dsl.tpkaks.sbcglobal.net)
21:19.03*** join/#wowhead zr (~zr@S0106001839a05b57.vc.shawcable.net)
21:19.03*** join/#wowhead zr (~zr@unaffiliated/zr)
21:19.38*** join/#wowhead Gary13579 (~zzz@184-97-12-124.frgo.qwest.net)
21:19.38*** join/#wowhead Gary13579 (~zzz@unaffiliated/Gary13579)
21:48.33*** join/#wowhead bien|| (~bien@p57B63D17.dip.t-dialin.net)
21:49.34*** join/#wowhead Eeveevolve_ (~Eeveevolv@82.27.64.202)
21:49.35*** join/#wowhead Aeyan (~pancake@cpe-024-163-014-009.triad.res.rr.com)
21:50.54*** join/#wowhead hahuang65 (~hahuang65@209.129.244.250)
21:52.51[-jon-]has anyone tried out the PTR?
21:56.40*** join/#wowhead greedz (~greedz@gearhq.local.ines.ro)
21:56.50*** join/#wowhead pompy (~Mike@c-76-116-64-179.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
22:06.00*** join/#wowhead twsX (~tws@static.230.96.46.78.clients.your-server.de)
22:06.57*** join/#wowhead VCH (~chatzilla@ool-18be77ff.dyn.optonline.net)
22:15.56[-jon-]so mining is going to suck next patch
22:15.59[-jon-]ore prices are going to fucking tank
22:16.10Ac-townwhy?
22:16.26[-jon-]gemsw ill only vendor for 75s
22:16.32[-jon-]which is retarded
22:16.37Ac-townwasn't in the patch notes
22:16.41Ac-townit was data-mined
22:16.47Ac-townso it may not happen in 4.1
22:16.51[-jon-]I bet it will
22:16.56Ac-townI could see it
22:16.59Ac-townbut its not offical
22:17.04Djanewhich ore prices?
22:17.09[-jon-]elementium and obsidium
22:17.15DjaneAhh, I don't care then.
22:17.18DjaneI only stock up on pyrite.
22:17.23[-jon-]pyrite might too
22:17.24Ac-townI have been thinking about maxing JC on my pally
22:17.30BlackNetpyrites going to crash as well
22:17.30Ac-town85 to 500
22:17.32DjaneDoubt it.
22:17.35Ac-townunfun
22:17.36[-jon-]after 4.1 i might start stocking up on pyrite
22:17.38BlackNettransmuting
22:17.39DjanePyrites tied to other things.
22:17.46[-jon-]pyrite will go down.
22:17.46Djaneand is also limited in supply.
22:18.04[-jon-]elementium will be worthless
22:18.39Djanealso
22:18.52Djanegem vendor price doesn't necessitate price crashes.
22:19.02DjaneAll it means is you won't have a floating point.
22:19.30[-jon-]ore prices bottomed out at around 35-40g a stack
22:19.34[-jon-]because you can vendor the gems for that much
22:19.38DjaneYes, floating point.
22:19.55[-jon-]I bet they will at least be half of current prices
22:20.00[-jon-]half or below
22:20.06BlackNetand think what ore prices were when cata rolled out
22:20.24[-jon-]can you not cut perfect gems when youre doing your jc daily?
22:20.34[-jon-]I used to hear people bitching about cutting perfect ones, but i have never
22:20.37DjaneYou can no longer cut perfect solid/timeless/the other one.
22:20.44DjaneIt was changed.
22:21.16BlackNetwhich upcoming patch will give everyone MVP awards? :)
22:21.17BlackNetducks
22:29.49*** join/#wowhead Funkeh`` (~funk@5ad4d5e7.bb.sky.com)
22:34.41*** join/#wowhead rcfreak0 (~rcfreak0@adsl-76-199-157-250.dsl.milwwi.sbcglobal.net)
22:42.00*** join/#wowhead Gnarfoz (smallbrain@geektour.de)
22:43.35*** join/#wowhead Gnarfoz (smallbrain@WoWUIDev/WowAce/Gnarfoz)
22:52.05*** join/#wowhead Gunrun (sausages@82.14.59.171)
22:58.37*** join/#wowhead Nechckn_AFK (~N@WoWUIDev/Norganna/Admin/Nechckn)
23:01.45*** join/#wowhead Pneumatus (~WiN@81.174.255.129)
23:01.45*** join/#wowhead Pneumatus (~WiN@unaffiliated/pneumatus)
23:05.42*** join/#wowhead VCH (~chatzilla@ool-18be77ff.dyn.optonline.net)
23:22.53*** join/#wowhead Mowsey (~Mowsey@99-125-182-163.lightspeed.wlfrct.sbcglobal.net)
23:35.34*** join/#wowhead rannmann (~SmurfGutz@209-193-57-225-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net)
23:44.44*** join/#wowhead Interest (~chatzilla@c-66-31-30-111.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
23:45.15Interesthttp://www.mmo-champion.com/content/2246-Patch-4.1-Archaeology-Items-4.1-PTR-Notes-Update-Blue-Posts-Artwork-Daily-Blink
23:45.23Interestblog on this may be needed for wowhead =D
23:50.27*** join/#wowhead Jamash (~Jamash@99-92-174-69.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.