| 00:13.55 | jfindlay | ~napoleon jlp_znc |
| 00:13.55 | infobot | ACTION makes jlp_znc his secret service captain |
| 00:14.32 | jlp_znc | !nacho jfindlay |
| 00:14.42 | jlp_znc | !nacho jfindlay |
| 00:14.47 | jlp_znc | grr |
| 00:14.52 | jlp_znc | ~nacho jfindlay |
| 00:14.53 | infobot | ACTION sprays scalding hot nacho cheese sauce all over jfindlay |
| 00:14.58 | jlp_znc | stupid mac keyboard |
| 00:16.48 | jfindlay | lol |
| 00:21.53 | jfindlay | jlp_znc: I installed armored, grounded cable in my conduit, but it wasn't observationally necessary because I tested the link with and without the power on that circuit |
| 00:22.08 | jfindlay | and there was no observational difference in speed, latency, or jitter |
| 00:22.52 | jfindlay | I have an unmanaged switch I'm going to try now though. Even though the spec says 100 m per link, I doubt the consumer grade modem I have can push signal that long |
| 00:40.43 | jlp_znc | you could check your termination of the cable, too... make sure you have twists close enough to the plug. |
| 01:35.08 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@174-23-16-204.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 03:58.15 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@174-23-16-204.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 12:56.46 | *** join/#utah emcnabb (~emcnabb@192-241-60-233.ip.ctc.biz) |
| 13:31.32 | *** join/#utah magmu (~Magical_M@174.27.130.38) |
| 15:15.27 | spangborn | hires youtah as jester |
| 16:44.01 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@70.89.246.241-Busname-UT.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 16:48.37 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@70.89.246.241-Busname-UT.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 16:57.04 | youtah | That's not funny |
| 16:57.07 | youtah | Har har har har |
| 16:58.13 | youtah | like jlp_znc said, for it to meet CAT5e Spec I think the twists have to be less than 0.5" away from the RJ-45 connector |
| 16:58.59 | youtah | Oh, well, this is handy |
| 16:59.01 | youtah | http://www.cablek.com/client_file/upload/image/Cat5-Cat6-patch-cable-diffe.jpg |
| 16:59.08 | youtah | Left is CAT6, right is CAT5e |
| 17:00.09 | youtah | Wow |
| 17:00.15 | youtah | CAT7 has been proposed to be 600Hz |
| 17:00.19 | youtah | MHz* |
| 17:29.02 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@70.89.246.241-Busname-UT.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 17:44.24 | *** join/#utah emcnabb (~emcnabb@c-73-22-31-85.hsd1.il.comcast.net) |
| 18:00.15 | *** join/#utah chum_ (~chum_@192.225.180.2) |
| 19:48.58 | *** join/#utah akmod (~akmod@107.191.1.95.static.utbb.net) |
| 20:08.45 | *** join/#utah youtah (~youtah@50-198-176-9-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 20:08.45 | *** mode/#utah [+v youtah] by ChanServ |
| 22:46.16 | spangborn | that hertz |
