| 00:24.53 | *** join/#utah bashNinja (uid121707@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kunzgutonbxyiujz) |
| 07:28.25 | *** join/#utah yukaia (sid110254@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-rbocpiulkwddjtzm) |
| 11:47.12 | *** join/#utah emcnabb (~emcnabb@hs-nc-1fff767f54-29977-1.tingfiber.com) |
| 13:29.10 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@74.114.153.251) |
| 14:49.29 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@74.114.153.251) |
| 16:44.44 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@70.89.246.241-Busname-UT.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 17:22.22 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@74.114.153.251) |
| 19:08.42 | *** join/#utah Heartsbane (tsharpe@unaffiliated/heartsbane) |
| 20:20.56 | romanovic | i hate to see felony charges doled out liberally. my family's seen first hand how difficult it is for someone to support themselves just by having that on their record, even though they'd make a good employee |
| 20:23.04 | romanovic | on the other hand, I wish the SL trib wouldn't conflate protesters with those destroying property or becoming violent. And then use the "you value property more than people" argument |
| 20:27.11 | romanovic | if you destroy enough property, you'll be charged with a felony. that has always been the case. if $5000 doesn't merit a felony charge, where should the threshold be? $25000? $1M? charges not filed for any amount of damage, as long as it was done in the name of civil rights protest? I think those would be more relevant discussions |
| 21:56.53 | *** join/#utah onesluttychicken (~braxtron@97-117-110-105.slkc.qwest.net) |