| 00:12.34 | *** join/#utah magmu_ (~Magical_M@174.27.155.81) |
| 00:25.25 | jfindlay | so much environmental responsibility in that cmdline |
| 00:25.44 | jfindlay | is it carbon neutral? Does it interrogate the genders? |
| 00:25.52 | jfindlay | is it woken? |
| 00:26.43 | jfindlay | ~woke eightyeight |
| 00:27.56 | jfindlay | infobot: woke $n is <action>(dresses $n in hammer pants|gives $n organic avocado toast) |
| 00:27.56 | infobot | jfindlay: okay |
| 00:28.00 | jfindlay | ~woke eightyeight |
| 00:28.00 | infobot | ACTION gives eightyeight organic avocado toast |
| 00:28.23 | jfindlay | infobot: no woke $n is <action>(dresses $n in hammer pants|sells $n organic avocado toast) |
| 00:28.23 | infobot | jfindlay: okay |
| 00:29.12 | jfindlay | ~woke youtah__ |
| 00:29.12 | infobot | ACTION dresses youtah__ in hammer pants |
| 01:08.05 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@174-23-77-118.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 03:14.11 | *** join/#utah zzzirk (~zzzirk@166.70.72.157) |
| 06:49.59 | *** join/#utah Sargun (~sargun@80.60.198.104.bc.googleusercontent.com) |
| 11:14.34 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~aeryndunh@c-73-85-193-185.hsd1.fl.comcast.net) |
| 12:38.55 | *** join/#utah emcnabb (~emcnabb@hs-nc-1fff767f54-29977-1.tingfiber.com) |
| 14:59.16 | spangborn | youtah__: ban cars |
| 15:47.19 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~aeryndunh@96.71.45.252) |
| 15:53.11 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~aeryndunh@96.71.45.252) |
| 16:58.12 | jlp_znc | https://neal.fun/deep-sea/ <- scroll down |
| 16:59.36 | RyanE | I feel like this is going to rickroll me. |
| 16:59.46 | jlp_znc | nope |
| 17:03.54 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@70.89.246.241-Busname-UT.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 17:39.55 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@74.114.153.251) |
| 19:40.16 | spangborn | Sheâs so purty https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/d4hjyIc6/IMG_1895.JPG |
| 19:56.18 | romanovic | is that your commuter, spangborn? |
| 19:56.26 | spangborn | Yep, just finished it today |
| 19:56.57 | spangborn | Probably won't run the rack 100% of the time, but wanted to test out using it at least |
| 19:59.59 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@74.114.153.251) |
| 20:04.15 | jfindlay | ~woke spangborn |
| 20:04.15 | infobot | ACTION dresses spangborn in hammer pants |
| 20:04.30 | jfindlay | ~trump |
| 20:04.30 | infobot | a real stable genius |
| 20:37.11 | romanovic | looks nice! |
| 20:37.36 | romanovic | spangborn: what's your opinion on running panniers on a road commuter bike? I have my next cheap commuter hanging up in my garage, and I want to put a rack on it |
| 20:38.24 | romanovic | the voluminati seem pretty vocally opposed to all panniers on anything resembling a road bike, but there's no way I'm backpacking all my gear on every commute |
| 20:38.43 | romanovic | I hadn't considered a rack on front before... |
| 20:40.04 | spangborn | For commuting? Totally fine |
| 20:40.08 | spangborn | Better than a backpack. |
| 20:45.29 | romanovic | s/voluminati/velominati/ |
| 20:47.09 | jlp_znc | why do you want the rack on the front? doesn't that get in the way? |
| 20:49.50 | spangborn | Nope, not really |
| 20:50.28 | spangborn | romanovic: I'll probably run some small panniers on this at some point |
| 20:50.40 | jlp_znc | is it easier with the weight above the front wheel than the rear? what if you have a wide package sitting on the rack? |
| 20:51.07 | spangborn | It's not as easy, but you can typically fit bigger things on a front rack |
| 20:51.22 | spangborn | and you're less likely to have foot rub problems with panniers there |
| 20:58.25 | romanovic | maybe better weight management too... I feel like the extra weight on the back might result in some pinch flats. I have a bumpy route, and there's less dampening of body weight impact on the back like there is on the front, with my arms |
| 21:07.33 | spangborn | You can also get bags lower to the ground on front racks |
| 23:09.55 | *** join/#utah zzzirk (~zzzirk@50.239.116.158) |
