| 04:37.34 | *** join/#utah frostyfrog_ (~frostyfro@c-174-52-150-161.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 04:42.21 | *** join/#utah frostyfrog (~frostyfro@unaffiliated/frostyfrog) |
| 04:49.07 | *** join/#utah frostyfrog (~frostyfro@unaffiliated/frostyfrog) |
| 04:57.38 | *** join/#utah youtah__ (~youtah@67.139.187.131) |
| 04:57.38 | *** mode/#utah [+v youtah__] by ChanServ |
| 12:38.21 | *** join/#utah emcnabb (~emcnabb@hs-nc-1fff767f54-29977-1.tingfiber.com) |
| 14:18.07 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@74.114.153.251) |
| 15:26.35 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~aeryndunh@96.71.45.252) |
| 16:00.21 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@70.89.246.241-Busname-UT.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 16:48.59 | jlp_znc | ~karma jira |
| 16:48.59 | infobot | jira has neutral karma |
| 16:49.12 | jlp_znc | nodebit: I think you have to ~ in front of it |
| 17:17.23 | romanovic | spangborn: what sort of receiver/tuner device do you use with antenna plex |
| 17:18.00 | spangborn | I bought the Xbox one from this list: https://support.plex.tv/articles/225877427-supported-dvr-tuners-and-antennas/ |
| 17:18.12 | spangborn | Just as a test - the networked ones are nicer and probably more robust, but I don't use it all that often |
| 17:19.01 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@74.114.153.251) |
| 17:21.51 | romanovic | cool. I think I'm going to try one of these |
| 19:55.35 | *** join/#utah youtah (~youtah@67.139.187.131) |
| 19:55.35 | *** mode/#utah [+v youtah] by ChanServ |
| 19:59.10 | *** join/#utah youtah (~youtah@67.139.187.131) |
| 19:59.10 | *** mode/#utah [+v youtah] by ChanServ |
| 20:07.05 | *** join/#utah youtah (~youtah@67.139.187.131) |
| 20:07.06 | *** mode/#utah [+v youtah] by ChanServ |
| 20:17.42 | jfindlay | ~napoleon youtah |
| 20:17.43 | infobot | ACTION makes youtah buy a lotto ticket for Napoleon |
| 20:44.09 | jlp_znc | ~warren jfindlay |
| 20:44.09 | infobot | ACTION pays for jfindlay's college |
| 20:44.22 | jlp_znc | already paid for yours? aww, too bad. |
| 21:59.52 | jlp_znc | so what do you guys think of the motorola razr? |
| 22:00.19 | jlp_znc | the *only* think I don't like about it is the $1500 price tag :D |
| 22:00.30 | jlp_znc | s/think/thing/ |
| 22:10.35 | jfindlay | I paid $105 for my phone |
| 22:20.15 | BigBen212 | I'd wait to see real-world examples of how well that screen works :) |
| 22:20.28 | BigBen212 | but in no way would I spend that much on a phone |
| 22:21.16 | BigBen212 | I was happy with my Moto G, so as far as the brand, it's good |
| 22:21.23 | BigBen212 | but now I'm back to Nokia |
| 22:59.38 | *** join/#utah youtah_ (~youtah@69.169.133.42) |
| 22:59.38 | *** mode/#utah [+v youtah_] by ChanServ |
| 23:02.10 | youtah_ | https://imgur.com/gallery/ZNiYOUz |
| 23:02.12 | youtah_ | LOL |
| 23:02.23 | youtah_ | Make sure you turn the sound on |
| 23:04.57 | romanovic | no interest in this razr. they could, alternatively, make a folding model with a near invisible seam between two separate displays that effectively work in unison. I'd take that phone any day over the flexible screen style. take that $1000 extra dollars spent on a bendy screen, beef up everything else about the phone instead |
| 23:05.29 | BigBen212 | romanovic: agreed |
| 23:12.24 | romanovic | feels like the 3D TV trend. Lots of TV manufacturers for some reason interested in putting it in their TVs, not many consumers demanding it. You know what's more interesting than 3D? I'll spend my money on higher resolution, better contrast, higher refresh rate. That's what consumers wanted and still want, in 2D |
| 23:33.38 | *** join/#utah youtah__ (~youtah@67.139.187.132) |
| 23:33.38 | *** mode/#utah [+v youtah__] by ChanServ |