00:24.36 | *** join/#utah infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
00:24.36 | *** topic/#utah is Utah-related discussion including user groups | logs @ http://infobot.rikers.org/%23utah/ | See also ##lds | To combat spam, you must register with NickServ if you wish to speak. This may or may not be temporary. |
00:24.36 | *** mode/#utah [+o infobot] by ChanServ |
00:47.19 | *** join/#utah Heartsbane (tsharpe@unaffiliated/heartsbane) |
01:02.38 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@c-98-202-89-52.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
03:30.30 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@c-174-52-11-31.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
07:07.03 | *** join/#utah fadein (~Erik@c-24-10-167-68.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
12:00.04 | *** join/#utah emcnabb (~emcnabb@hs-nc-1fff767f54-29977-1.tingfiber.com) |
13:09.50 | *** join/#utah Migs (~migs@205.122.50.217) |
13:10.27 | *** join/#utah Migs (~migs@205.122.50.217) |
14:02.16 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@c-174-52-11-31.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
15:23.51 | *** join/#utah braxtron (~braxtron@216.160.248.178) |
15:34.48 | *** join/#utah Heartsbane (tsharpe@shell.xmission.com) |
15:34.48 | *** join/#utah Heartsbane (tsharpe@unaffiliated/heartsbane) |
16:01.03 | *** join/#utah youtah (~youtah@67.139.187.132) |
16:03.15 | *** join/#utah tiwula (~lane@ip68-108-200-227.ph.ph.cox.net) |
16:17.15 | *** join/#utah kim27 (~kim@unaffiliated/kim27) |
17:10.22 | romanovic | ~bofh why was the launch aborted |
17:10.33 | romanovic | that should be a feature infobot. |
17:11.22 | romanovic | "parallel processors running perpendicular today" |
17:17.04 | *** join/#utah josephscott (~josephsco@c-174-52-11-31.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
17:30.00 | *** join/#utah testicon (~testicon@cpe-76-181-239-127.columbus.res.rr.com) |
18:54.04 | romanovic | who knows a good alternative to 'WITH RECURSIVE' queries in mysql, when using older versions that don't support it? |
18:54.48 | romanovic | There is a stored procedure approach that can emulate it, but I won't use stored procedures except as a last resort |
18:55.40 | BigBen212 | not super-familiar with that, but is that for hierarchical queries, window in postgres ? |
18:56.21 | BigBen212 | in that case, if you want to get around analytical functions, you can always join to itself |
19:07.18 | romanovic | BigBen212: I need to go 1...N levels deep, so a simple query on a self-referencing table isn't enough if 'with recursive' isn't available |
19:07.34 | romanovic | s/query/join/ |
19:09.32 | BigBen212 | without recursion and with more levels, I don't think you can get around a function then |
20:03.26 | frostyfrog | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQEqKZ7CJlk&feature=em-lbcastemail |
23:07.06 | *** join/#utah manithree (~blr@170-72-57-238.vivintwireless.net) |