| 00:19.54 | *** join/#utah Nemus (~Nemus@unaffiliated/nemus) |
| 00:45.10 | *** join/#utah jajaladodo (~textual@104.200.154.46) |
| 06:59.31 | *** join/#utah romanovic (~romanovic@puritynine.com) |
| 14:15.53 | eightyeight | 28/32: Smithy Code- https://twitter.com/AaronToponce/status/800702213735624705 |
| 14:38.13 | *** join/#utah nage (~nathan.ge@unaffiliated/nage) |
| 15:17.10 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~aeryndunh@151.124.47.51) |
| 15:43.35 | *** join/#utah SunSparc (~jonathan@45.56.57.85) |
| 16:14.40 | *** join/#utah aarobc (~aarobc@216.51.32.182) |
| 16:15.19 | *** join/#utah SunSparc (~jonathan@45.56.57.85) |
| 18:30.23 | spangborn | ~brave-- |
| 19:38.36 | *** join/#utah joshh (josh@2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fedf:c9dd) |
| 19:52.20 | *** join/#utah unum (~unum@truecomputing.biz) |
| 20:14.05 | *** join/#utah tuxlovesyou (~supremeov@andrewssh.com) |
| 20:15.35 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~aeryndunh@151.124.47.51) |
| 20:16.22 | aeryndunham | So we think we know what all our crazy ping traffic is, and we DON'T think we've been turned into a ddos botnet |
| 20:17.27 | aeryndunham | looks like a fair number of crew members have discovered Your Freedom, which is allowing them to bypass our internet portal and disguises all their traffic as pings |
| 20:17.47 | fadein | aeryndunham: ah, nice |
| 20:18.08 | *** join/#utah aarobc (~aarobc@216.51.32.182) |
| 20:20.33 | aeryndunham | More logical considering just the sheer volume of pings. |
| 20:22.10 | programmerq | that's awesome |
| 20:22.21 | spangborn | lol |
| 20:22.32 | spangborn | BUSTED |
| 20:24.01 | aeryndunham | We do charge crew a lot for internet, so I understand why they try that stuff |
| 20:28.29 | *** join/#utah BitBandit (~BitBandit@50-198-187-221-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 20:28.31 | romanovic | wow, so they were using all of that traffic without paying for it? |
| 20:28.42 | aeryndunham | Looks like it |
| 20:28.56 | aeryndunham | I mean if even only a handful are using it, they could be downloading all kinds of movies and things |
| 20:29.06 | aeryndunham | It might not explain aLL our ping traffic, but it's definitely part of i |
| 20:29.08 | aeryndunham | it |
| 20:29.25 | spangborn | That'd explain the disparity between outgoing and incoming traffc |
| 20:29.26 | spangborn | *traffic |
| 20:29.32 | aeryndunham | yeah |
| 20:29.57 | aeryndunham | We aren't really looking to get anyone in trouble |
| 20:30.05 | aeryndunham | just... stop all this bandwidth from being used |
| 20:36.25 | joshh | what kind of workplace is this? |
| 20:36.34 | joshh | where "crew" pay for internet? |
| 20:36.51 | joshh | like a cruise ship or something? |
| 20:36.58 | aeryndunham | yeah |
| 20:37.03 | aeryndunham | a cruise ship |
| 20:37.05 | joshh | wow |
| 20:39.35 | joshh | what happens if someone gets fired while at sea? |
| 20:40.16 | aeryndunham | They get sent home from the next port |
| 20:40.40 | aeryndunham | people get fired all the time |
| 20:40.46 | joshh | do they usually do the termination while pulling in so there's no time for shenanigans? |
| 20:41.05 | aeryndunham | No, I don't think si |
| 20:41.08 | joshh | equivalent of the "friday after lunch" when on land |
| 20:41.45 | aeryndunham | I've never been to a disciplinary hearing so I don't really know |
| 20:42.56 | romanovic | fired all the time? how major do infractions need to be to get fired while at sea? |
| 20:43.19 | joshh | i would guess the rules are pretty strict |
| 20:43.21 | aeryndunham | It depends on your department, boss, and how nice the captain is to be honest |
| 20:43.29 | aeryndunham | Rules are very strict |
| 20:43.38 | aeryndunham | and our current captain is kind of an ass |
| 20:44.25 | joshh | is there a brig? |
| 20:44.30 | aeryndunham | it's also always very rank-based and vaugely racist? Like if you are an Indian dishwasher and you get caught being waaaaaay drunk, you're almost definitely fired, but a British officer? You'd probably get a warning. Which is horrible, but it happens |
| 20:44.32 | aeryndunham | no brig |
| 20:45.00 | joshh | also no plank i assume |
| 20:45.04 | aeryndunham | haha no |
| 20:47.36 | joshh | what kind of network gear is on the ship |
| 20:47.57 | joshh | should at least be doable to trace the source of the icmp to a person right? |
| 20:49.10 | spangborn | They should add a plank |
| 20:49.15 | spangborn | It'd be way more exciting |
| 20:50.26 | *** join/#utah nage (~nathan.ge@unaffiliated/nage) |
| 20:51.22 | aeryndunham | Yeah, I'd be able to trace it; easier if the person has signed into the ship's network the real way before |
| 20:51.24 | aeryndunham | and has a username |
| 20:51.34 | *** join/#utah nage (~nathan.ge@unaffiliated/nage) |
| 20:51.53 | aeryndunham | Network gear? Uhh I guess I don't know exactly? Cisco, I know that, 4 wireless controllers and 400+ access points? |
| 20:52.19 | joshh | is it all to the same destination ip/subnet of the icmp tunneling vpn provider or whatever? maybe easy to block |
| 20:52.27 | aeryndunham | a bazillion hub lockers here because all the phones are IP phones |
| 22:23.55 | jima | seems like a great case for a switch fabric that can address them all as one unit. |
| 23:04.26 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~aeryndunh@151.124.47.51) |
| 23:07.02 | *** join/#utah aeryndunham (~jacki@151.124.47.51) |