| 00:48.28 | *** join/#ubuntu-utah sontek (n=sontek@c-67-161-252-206.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 02:53.27 | Zelut | I think my chat is broken |
| 03:03.35 | sontek | oh noes |
| 03:03.51 | sontek | fix it! |
| 03:03.54 | Zelut | thank you |
| 03:08.42 | encryptz | Zelut: jabber broken? |
| 03:13.01 | Zelut | encryptz: I'm guessing it is if you haven't got my IMs |
| 03:13.16 | encryptz | yeah. haven't gotten one yet... |
| 03:13.46 | Zelut | I thought you left or something because I replied right away.. |
| 03:15.40 | encryptz | hmmm |
| 03:15.55 | Zelut | getting that same dumb error I had before |
| 03:15.58 | encryptz | i wonder if others have been trying to get ahold of me also |
| 03:16.09 | encryptz | i'll restart my jabber server. just a sec |
| 03:17.40 | encryptz | k. try now |
| 03:17.46 | Zelut | hmm.. getting error 500 to jabber |
| 03:18.04 | encryptz | funny, i don't even see you online |
| 03:20.02 | Zelut | hmm |
| 03:25.41 | encryptz | any luck? |
| 03:26.00 | Zelut | still can't get in |
| 03:26.26 | Zelut | last time I solved this by removing and re-adding my account on bitlbee |
| 03:29.24 | encryptz | hmmm |
| 03:33.45 | Zelut | I can't figure it out |
| 03:34.00 | Zelut | I've even killed the bitlbee process |
| 03:35.16 | encryptz | what if you login with gaim? |
| 03:37.28 | Zelut | looks like its trying.. |
| 03:39.40 | Zelut | ...and not being able to |
| 03:40.50 | encryptz | maybe google doesn't like you anymore. ツ |
| 03:40.57 | Zelut | perhaps |
| 03:41.50 | encryptz | well, i'm getting tired. off to bed for me |
| 03:42.08 | encryptz | it's not even 9 yet either. :) |
| 03:56.58 | Zelut | I can't seem to connect anywhere.. |
| 03:57.16 | Zelut | anyone else having trouble with Jabber? I'm sure it's just me |
| 04:44.28 | sontek | I'm on gtalk just fine |
| 04:55.33 | Zelut | hmm |
| 04:55.38 | Zelut | brb |
| 07:38.40 | *** join/#ubuntu-utah MrBrizzio (n=brizz@c-67-169-245-85.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 07:43.02 | *** join/#ubuntu-utah Zelut (n=christer@ubuntu/member/zelut) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 07:43.02 | *** join/#ubuntu-utah sontek (n=sontek@c-67-161-252-206.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 07:59.55 | *** join/#ubuntu-utah rallred_ (n=nobody@64.193.228.251) |
| 12:35.58 | *** join/#ubuntu-utah etank (n=elake@74-140-129-0.dhcp.insightbb.com) |
| 15:44.46 | Zelut | well I'm not sure what happened but I can connect to Jabber again |
| 15:45.27 | encryptz | can or cannot |
| 15:46.45 | Zelut | can |
| 15:47.02 | encryptz | i don't see you online... |
| 15:47.22 | encryptz | nm |
| 15:47.30 | Zelut | I see you |
| 15:49.12 | Zelut | I finally took a minute to setup public key auth to my irssi box. got tired of doing passwords :) |
| 15:50.18 | encryptz | what do you mean, public key auth? |
| 15:51.14 | Zelut | ssh auth.. whatever you call it |
| 15:51.38 | encryptz | oh, you mean between you and your ssh server? i thought you were meaning between you and freenode |
| 15:51.47 | encryptz | yeah. key auth rocks! |
| 15:52.34 | Zelut | even wrote up a tutorial for it. I think that blog is half for the visitors & half to help me remember how to do things! |
| 15:52.47 | encryptz | :) |
| 15:53.21 | Zelut | I use it all the time for reminders & to reference people. |
| 15:54.38 | Zelut | I do need to make sure that it's all in the help.ubuntu.com to avoid the wrath of the docs guys |
| 15:54.43 | encryptz | they can be a pain |
| 15:55.02 | encryptz | i've was on the gwos team, and they had run-ins with them all the tim |
| 15:55.05 | encryptz | *time |
| 16:08.21 | Zelut | I've got posts pending on VLC, key auth & setting up Beryl on feisty. any other ideas? |
| 16:12.05 | Zelut | Happy SuperBowl day everyone :) |
| 16:15.04 | Zelut | I think my server is slow today.. or maybe it's my connection |
| 16:30.50 | tristanbob_ | Zelut: do you post your tutorials on the ubuntu wiki? |
| 16:31.01 | tristanbob_ | if not the content, then at least a reference? |
| 16:33.48 | Zelut | tristanbob_: They want me to make sure that any of my tutorials are alse documented there as well |
| 17:10.38 | Zelut | I think they should just assign someone to my blog for transcribing :) |
| 17:19.48 | encryptz | anyone read the illiad? |
| 17:28.53 | Zelut | as in the illiad & the odysey (sp)? |
| 17:32.50 | encryptz | yah |
| 17:33.40 | encryptz | all of the sudden, i've been consumed with studying greek mythology |
| 17:33.52 | encryptz | i don't know why, but it's extremely fascinating |
| 17:36.33 | Zelut | I think I read both of those years ago.. not sure I remember much |
| 17:42.41 | encryptz | bears or colts? |
| 17:42.55 | Zelut | bears |
| 17:43.19 | encryptz | bears. 24-21 |
| 17:45.02 | Zelut | man my connection is really slow today |
| 17:47.00 | encryptz | sorry |
| 17:47.57 | encryptz | ok. math time (sorry for jumping around- my mind is in 5th gear atm) |
| 17:48.37 | encryptz | if i'm listening to an mp3 stream, and the stream is 128Kbps, then that means 16KBps, right? |
| 17:49.43 | maquis | ~128/8 |
| 17:49.44 | jbot | 16 |
| 17:49.47 | encryptz | or, is that just the bitrate of the mp3? |
| 17:50.01 | encryptz | which does not necessarily mean the bandwidth overhead? |
| 17:51.14 | Zelut | ..and I think you confused me too |
| 17:51.34 | encryptz | ok. an mp3 is encoded at 128Kbps |
| 17:51.51 | encryptz | that mp3 is on the web, and i decide to listen to it |
| 17:52.35 | encryptz | because of it's encoding, is the '128Kbps' also the network bandwidth? |
| 17:52.48 | encryptz | will i be downloading the stream at 128Kbps? |
| 17:53.03 | encryptz | i would think so, but i'm unsure |
| 17:53.35 | Zelut | I don't think so. |
| 17:53.36 | encryptz | how could i measure the network bandwidth of the stream, then? |
| 17:55.33 | Zelut | something like ntop or some bandwidth monitor? |
| 17:56.41 | encryptz | installing ntop now |
| 17:57.23 | Zelut | I used to use ntop when I was trying to setup my torrent limits |
| 17:57.34 | Zelut | its been a while now since I've used it though |
| 17:57.42 | encryptz | cool. then you can help me with it if i have questions. :) |
| 17:58.20 | Zelut | if I can remember :) |
| 17:58.38 | encryptz | so i do i start it...? |
| 17:58.41 | Zelut | I think I actually wrote a wiki for it once upon a time. let me see if its still there |
| 18:00.27 | Zelut | ugh my connection is unbearably slow. I wonder what it is |
| 18:00.45 | Zelut | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ntop |
| 18:01.39 | Zelut | looks like its a bit old, but that should get you going |
| 18:04.01 | encryptz | hmmm. so, i have it pulled up in the browser, is there a way to see the stream bitrate? |
| 18:07.36 | Zelut | I guess I'm not quite sure what you're looking for.. a 128 encoded song will play at that rate and take up the bandwidth of the file size.. |
| 18:09.45 | encryptz | ok. i'm listening to an online radio (radio paradise). i'm curious about the network bandwith that i'm downloading from them |
| 18:10.36 | encryptz | i click on the '128k MP3' link |
| 18:13.27 | Zelut | well I wouldn't think it'd be coming in at that rate. I'm sure your in/out pipe fluctuates quite a bit |
| 18:15.01 | Zelut | but doesn't ntop show you the bandwidth of that incoming stream? |
| 18:15.10 | encryptz | hmmm. looks like the average is 140Kbps for listening to a stream that is encoded in 128Kbps |
| 18:16.14 | encryptz | so, if that's true: |
| 18:16.35 | encryptz | 140Kpbs = 17.5KBps |
| 18:17.07 | encryptz | 17.5 * 60 * 60 * 8 = 504MB of downloaded data in an 8-hour work day? |
| 18:18.02 | encryptz | so, 500MB of downloaded data in one workshift. that's 2.5GB in one week, or ~10GB in a month |
| 18:19.07 | Zelut | sounds valid enough |
| 18:19.38 | encryptz | ok. that works. just curious |
| 18:22.16 | encryptz | what are the limits that xmission puts on bandwidth usage? |
| 18:22.29 | Zelut | 100G / mo for my account |
| 18:22.47 | encryptz | it varies by account? |
| 18:23.10 | Zelut | DSL accounts have higher limits & I'm sure business accounts have more |
| 18:23.19 | encryptz | hmmm |
| 18:23.50 | Zelut | that's what pisses me off. a DSL customer with 1/10 of my pipe has a higher overall limit than I do |
| 18:24.55 | encryptz | hmmm. yeah. that would be annoying |
| 18:26.40 | Zelut | do you think this RSS icon is *too* prominent? http://christeredwards.com/ |
| 18:27.28 | Zelut | I tried to make it the same size as the other buttons in the sidebar |
| 18:28.34 | encryptz | it is big |
| 18:28.40 | encryptz | no doubt there |
| 18:29.59 | Zelut | bumped my subscribers 10+ in two days so far.. |
| 18:31.31 | encryptz | heh. i would imagine. how can you miss it? :) |
| 18:32.36 | Zelut | up to 450 on the ubuntu blog too |
| 18:34.07 | encryptz | that's cool |
| 18:34.17 | encryptz | speaking of which, get this: |
| 18:34.56 | encryptz | ok, so, i'm still waiting for mako to approve my membership (whatever), so i decide to syndicate my blog to http://www.ubuntuweblogs.org |
| 18:35.24 | encryptz | i enter my details, including my blog feed (as needed) |
| 18:35.55 | encryptz | i wait a couple of days, then get an email from him saying i'm only allowed to submit my 'ubuntu' category feed per the rules |
| 18:36.45 | encryptz | he asks if i still want to submit my blog, and i tell him no, as i don't want only a small part of my blog to by syndicated, because of a single category |
| 18:37.06 | encryptz | i tell him also, that i post about ubuntu frequently, but don't necessarily tag it as such |
| 18:37.20 | encryptz | i give him a couple links to posts as examples |
| 18:37.25 | encryptz | so, guess what he says? |
| 18:37.39 | encryptz | well, just put all your posts under the 'ubuntu' category |
| 18:37.42 | encryptz | uhh.... |
| 18:37.49 | encryptz | then what's the point of categories? |
| 18:37.55 | encryptz | moron |
| 18:37.58 | Zelut | no kidding |
| 18:38.14 | sontek | Well, to be fair, whats the point of categories if you are posting about ubuntu and not categorizing as such? =) |
| 18:38.25 | Zelut | I wonder what he'd say if I apply.. if he'll only take my ubuntu category |
| 18:38.30 | encryptz | sontek: i refer you to the same links i have him |
| 18:38.48 | encryptz | 1) http://www.pthree.org/2007/02/02/using-gpg-with-mozilla-thunderbird/ |
| 18:39.18 | encryptz | 2) http://www.pthree.org/2007/01/26/why-i-dont-run-windows-5/ |
| 18:39.52 | encryptz | 3) http://www.pthree.org/2007/01/06/irssi-proxy/ |
| 18:39.56 | encryptz | there are many others |
| 18:40.04 | sontek | well, the first one deserves to be under ubuntu/debian because you are using aptitude in it |
| 18:40.09 | encryptz | which all have a higher overall category |
| 18:40.23 | encryptz | sontek: true, but it's not *about* ubuntu |
| 18:40.28 | sontek | does your blog engine not support tagging in multiple categories? |
| 18:40.34 | encryptz | it's about security *using* ubuntu |
| 18:40.45 | encryptz | sontek: yeah. it does. of course |
| 18:40.49 | sontek | in that case I'd put it in both |
| 18:41.16 | sontek | But it'd still go into ubuntu because a new user to linux is not going to know what aptitude is |
| 18:41.16 | encryptz | i use the ubuntu category for posts specifically about the distro or my involvement with it |
| 18:41.38 | Zelut | sontek: I often cross-categorize posts too |
| 18:41.53 | encryptz | i don't use the ubuntu category for software that i use in ubuntu, generally |
| 18:42.34 | encryptz | so, if i were to submit the ubuntu category feed, then all the posts about software in ubuntu would be overlooked, unless i tagged them in ubuntu |
| 18:42.37 | sontek | In my opinion you should, Because if I was reading your blog and wanted to see the things you wrote on ubuntu i'd miss out on some good articles |
| 18:42.59 | encryptz | at which point, every post practically, would be under the ubuntu tag, and that seems silly for the way i have the blog setup |
| 18:43.33 | sontek | you are missing the point of why they require that, look at your categories, OALUG, Perl, Personal, PHP, Python, Ruby, School, Scripting, Databases, CSS, etc. |
| 18:43.45 | sontek | do you think they want all that on an ubuntu blog site? =) |
| 18:44.18 | encryptz | of course they don't |
| 18:44.31 | sontek | Cross tag where necessary but don't demand that they allow you to syndicate your personal topics to their site =) |
| 18:45.39 | Zelut | I think I'm with sontek on this one |
| 18:45.46 | encryptz | i see the point, and i don't have a problem with it. that is fine. my problem is tagging a *lot* more under the ubuntu tag, *just* so the relative to semi-relative make it to the planet |
| 18:46.16 | sontek | Well, if its relative for the site it should be under the ubuntu category |
| 18:46.30 | sontek | if its 'semi-relative' i'd probably leave it off |
| 18:46.40 | encryptz | but, looking over tags that are *not* semi-relavent to ubuntu or ubuntu-related tech make up a small portion if my blog |
| 18:47.21 | encryptz | the thunderbird/gpg post i would call 'semi-relavent' as it can apply to any other distro or os |
| 18:47.41 | encryptz | the only reference to ubuntu is 'sude aptitude install ...' |
| 18:47.52 | sontek | but a new user would have trouble using it because you used a debian specific package manager |
| 18:48.03 | encryptz | if they didn't have it installed |
| 18:48.19 | sontek | I can see a new user to redhat googling around trying to find what rpm has aptitude in it |
| 18:49.20 | encryptz | thus, why i say i'm using ubuntu in the tutorial. if a redhat user reads the post, they'll realize that they need ubuntu to follow the howto |
| 18:49.37 | sontek | then its ubuntu related =) |
| 18:49.47 | encryptz | heh |
| 18:50.01 | sontek | lol but thats just how I tag my blog |
| 18:50.14 | encryptz | i just see the use of the 'ubuntu' category different than others |
| 18:50.20 | sontek | if you tag it linux, security, and ubuntu its not going to change the quality of your blog |
| 18:50.31 | encryptz | no. of course not |
| 18:50.46 | encryptz | just, rather, ubuntu will become a bloated category. that's all |
| 18:51.11 | encryptz | and, going back to my point: 90% of the content will make it to the planet anyway |
| 18:51.38 | encryptz | so, is the 10% really *that* big of a deal to keep off the planet? |
| 18:52.55 | sontek | I would think so, How many people reading the planet care that you got a new job? |
| 18:53.04 | sontek | or about your new years resolutions? |
| 18:53.07 | encryptz | no one, i hope |
| 18:53.35 | sontek | so they shouldn't have to read about it, the subscribe for ubuntu content |
| 18:54.22 | encryptz | which is fine. that's what kept me from submitting my blog. the 10% is that big of a deal. however |
| 18:54.54 | encryptz | look at planet.ubuntu.com or planet.debian.org. how much on on-topic and how much off? heck, look at openclue.org/ut |
| 18:55.36 | encryptz | it's a *lot* highter than 90/10. and while i'm not using that as justifcation for my blog, the point is, people really don't care |
| 18:55.56 | sontek | I think people care, its just to late to fix it |
| 18:55.58 | encryptz | if the post title isn't interesting, they don't read it |
| 18:56.06 | sontek | but they can enforce quality from here on out |
| 18:56.29 | encryptz | i syndicate several planets, blogs, news sites etc, and that's how it is. if it isn't interesting, i just skip past it |
| 18:56.39 | encryptz | no big deal |
| 18:57.47 | sontek | I'm not saying its a big deal, everytime I read about a developers new baby I'm not like OMGZ WHY IS THIS ON HERE?!!?!? |
| 18:57.57 | encryptz | btw- 90/10 might be a bit of an exaturation for my blog. probably more realistic to 75/25 |
| 18:58.07 | sontek | but it would've been nice to not have to read useless crap =) |
| 18:58.36 | encryptz | but how much of that author is off-topic and how much on? |
| 18:58.54 | encryptz | if more is off topic, then his blog should be removed |
| 18:59.31 | encryptz | nothing wrong with enforcing keeping the planet on topic. defintely from the start |
| 18:59.57 | sontek | well, he shouldn't be punished because hes proud of his newborn and wants to post pics/stories |
| 19:00.07 | encryptz | i just don't like the fact that i have to change the way i do things if i want to ensure that all ubuntu related posts make it to the planet |
| 19:00.08 | sontek | he should just have the correct tags syndicated |
| 19:00.59 | encryptz | however, i do plan on making a couple changes to my blog (what's new?) |
| 19:01.12 | sontek | lol |
| 19:01.33 | encryptz | that's the great thing about blogs: they evolve |
| 19:01.46 | encryptz | and you can see the change of the author also |
| 19:02.22 | Zelut | I think this would all work best if tagging was used more than categories and then tags syndicated |
| 19:03.21 | encryptz | i just want to keep my ubuntu tag for very specific ubuntu topics. like my ubuntu membership, or the ubuntu-utah team, or new ubuntu releases |
| 19:03.41 | encryptz | i don't want to use it for anything that *could* fall under the category one way or another |
| 19:04.15 | Zelut | ..and that is how tagging is different from categories. |
| 19:04.55 | encryptz | hmmm. have an example of tags vs categories? |
| 19:05.36 | Zelut | del.icio.us.. tag clouds. i'm sure you've seen it. used all over technorati.. |
| 19:05.51 | encryptz | ahh yeah |
| 19:05.52 | encryptz | ok |
| 19:06.06 | encryptz | i was thinking on the blog cms itself |
| 19:06.19 | encryptz | yeah. technorti is great |
| 19:06.33 | Zelut | well there are tagging plugins for wordpress too |
| 19:06.57 | Zelut | I used to have one installed but it broke with an update and I never went back to fix it |
| 19:07.26 | Zelut | problem is I don't know that rss is integrated with the tagging system to syndicate only certain tags |
| 19:07.35 | Zelut | ...at least with the plugins that I've used |
| 19:08.44 | Zelut | but I think that would be a good solution |
| 19:09.01 | encryptz | yeah |
| 19:09.28 | encryptz | you could technically create on-the-fly feeds for certain occasions, such as the ubuntu planet |
| 19:10.35 | encryptz | ok. so my interest is piqued |
| 19:11.21 | encryptz | is there a plugin for wordpress to do just that: create on-the-fly feeds from certain categories that you specify? |
| 19:11.27 | sontek | I need to blog about ubuntu things more often my blogs is pretty much just code |
| 19:12.04 | encryptz | sontek: what is the url to your blog(s)? |
| 19:12.44 | sontek | my tech blog is http://blog.sontek.net my personal one hasn't been updated in like 3 years |
| 19:12.44 | Zelut | sontek: I'm not sure I knew you even had a blog :) |
| 19:12.49 | sontek | haha |
| 19:12.53 | sontek | i'm sneaky! |
| 19:13.11 | sontek | Most of my stuff is on .NET/mono so probably not much interest to you guys :/ |
| 19:14.03 | sontek | although I have a huge post coming up about how to compile mono and monodevelop from source on ubuntu =) |
| 19:14.25 | Zelut | is that homegrown? |
| 19:15.22 | sontek | the blog engine? |
| 19:15.52 | Zelut | yeah |
| 19:16.23 | Zelut | brb |
| 19:16.48 | sontek | Its an opensource project I contribute to, http://www.subtextproject.com |
| 19:17.13 | sontek | It currently doesn't run under mono but I'm slowly working on it ;P |
| 19:18.19 | sontek | so the colts are going to run over da bears today |
| 19:18.41 | sontek | Peyton MVP |
| 19:20.02 | sontek | 24-10 colts win! |
| 19:45.29 | Zelut | you think so huh |
| 19:47.10 | sontek | lol neither do I |
| 19:47.19 | sontek | I was a huge football junky in highschool |
| 19:47.31 | sontek | and I've watched peyton since he was a freshman in college |
| 19:47.37 | sontek | so I just have to root for him :p |
| 19:47.40 | Zelut | I don't think I've seen a full game all season but I *always* catch the superbowl |
| 20:04.38 | Zelut | I wonder if I need to reset my modem or something. this connection is pathetic |
| 20:17.41 | Zelut | encryptz: now that I can type again it's blogging time :) |
| 20:53.54 | Zelut | anybody home? |
| 21:08.52 | sontek | :) |
| 21:17.13 | Zelut | can you remind me the syntax to dump text into a file? |
| 21:17.35 | Zelut | cat "some text" >> filename ? |
| 21:19.13 | *** join/#ubuntu-utah KingOberon (n=daddy@cpe-71-66-253-32.columbus.res.rr.com) |
| 21:19.50 | *** part/#ubuntu-utah KingOberon (n=daddy@cpe-71-66-253-32.columbus.res.rr.com) |
| 21:48.39 | herlo | Zelut: where are you watching the Superbowl? |
| 21:50.15 | Zelut | herlo: still pending |
| 21:51.29 | sontek | Zelut: >> will append the echo to the file > will rewrite the file |
| 21:52.26 | Zelut | sontek: yeah, I am trying to append but is that the right usage? |
| 21:52.36 | etank | echo 'text' >> filename |
| 21:53.25 | sontek | You have to use echo if its just text |
| 21:53.29 | sontek | cat will be from one file to the other |
| 21:53.34 | Zelut | ohh, thats right |
| 21:54.31 | herlo | Zelut: I was thinking about going to a bar for the big game, but I am not really interested in crowds, was looking for something more "friendly". |
| 21:54.40 | Zelut | so this would be valid: sudo echo "deb http://mirror.ubuntulinux.nl edgy-seveas all" >> /etc/apt/sources.list ? |
| 21:56.07 | etank | I dont think you can use sudo like that |
| 21:56.22 | etank | you may get a permission denied |
| 21:56.37 | sontek | thats correct syntax but >> is a piping it to a new command so you are sudoing with echo but not the >> /etc/apt/sources.list |
| 21:56.37 | Zelut | permission denied |
| 21:56.42 | herlo | Zelut: if you want "deb http://mirror.ubuntulinux.nl edgy-seveas all" to appear at the bottom of the file |
| 21:56.50 | herlo | that should work... |
| 21:57.15 | herlo | sontek: good point |
| 21:57.41 | herlo | wouldn't enclosing it in a subshell od the trick? |
| 21:57.52 | Zelut | so what would be the simplest command to append that to the list be? |
| 21:58.04 | herlo | ie sudo $(echo "deb http://mirror.ubuntulinux.nl edgy-seveas all" >> /etc/apt/sources.list) |
| 21:58.11 | herlo | something like that?? |
| 21:59.11 | herlo | no that won't work |
| 21:59.38 | herlo | because sudo is trying to act upon the result of the subcommand |
| 21:59.40 | herlo | hmm |
| 22:01.34 | etank | try this |
| 22:01.36 | etank | echo "deb http://mirror.ubuntulinux.nl edgy-seveas all" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list |
| 22:01.53 | etank | then you are echoing to sudo |
| 22:02.09 | herlo | yeah, I was getting close to that... |
| 22:02.14 | herlo | couldn't recall the tee |
| 22:02.19 | herlo | etank rocks |
| 22:02.45 | Zelut | there we go. |
| 22:02.53 | etank | found it on the Qutomatix wiki page :) |
| 22:03.02 | Zelut | lol |
| 22:03.08 | etank | i mean Automatix |
| 22:15.17 | herlo | Zelut: check out the new look at http://www.utos.org we need to add our logo to it... |
| 22:20.40 | Zelut | much better |
| 22:24.28 | herlo | so perty |
| 22:24.41 | herlo | cept looks like the categories thing still doesn't quite work... |
| 22:25.01 | herlo | it's related to the fact that I don't have the wp_link2cat table in the db...and I don't think I've the rights to add it... |
| 22:28.22 | sontek | very sexy =) |
| 22:31.52 | herlo | sontek: thx, I found it when I was looking for a design for GamesUtah.org, but I think it fits really well here... |
| 22:42.35 | sontek | whats your guys superbowl predictions? |
| 22:49.17 | herlo | sontek: somebody wins, and the commercials are cool |
| 22:49.31 | Zelut | my prediction is cool commercials and a less interesting game |
| 22:49.51 | Zelut | seems to have been the pattern over the last few years |
| 22:50.05 | herlo | Zelut: funny |
| 22:50.10 | herlo | we picked the same idea |
| 23:01.17 | tristanbob_ | Zelut: I have been creating wiki entries for my posts |
| 23:01.35 | tristanbob_ | if the material is already there, I add a section called "references" and link to my blog |
| 23:02.42 | Zelut | tristanbob_: maybe I should go back and add the reference section. |
| 23:03.06 | Zelut | tristanbob_: I just don't have time to re-write these posts twice, ya know |
| 23:10.22 | tristanbob_ | I copy-paste :) |
| 23:10.45 | tristanbob_ | https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CiscoConsole |
| 23:19.56 | sontek | coin toss coming up! |
| 23:20.06 | sontek | Let the commercials commence! |
| 23:21.16 | sontek | all these advertisements for the cheesey bites have me thinking about ordering some :[ |
| 23:21.47 | herlo | sontek: domino's? |
| 23:22.57 | sontek | herlo: pizza hut =) |
| 23:26.52 | Zelut | I wish I had a mythbox setup so I could record the commercials |
| 23:27.51 | Zelut | touchdown 92yd return |
| 23:28.09 | sontek | lol thats not a good start for the colts |
| 23:28.15 | Zelut | nope |
| 23:28.48 | Zelut | 7 points at 14 seconds in. jeez |
| 23:34.51 | Zelut | and now intercepted. the bears pwn this game |
| 23:35.24 | sontek | hahaa |
| 23:46.08 | herlo | sontek: aye |
| 23:46.21 | herlo | 92 yards really!! wow |
| 23:47.05 | Zelut | and the colts score |
| 23:47.22 | Zelut | this might actually be a good game yet |
| 23:50.08 | herlo | haha |
| 23:50.17 | herlo | it's gonna be 91-0 colts |
| 23:50.25 | herlo | if the game keeps going this way |
| 23:50.55 | Zelut | ...well the bears already have 7 so you're off there |
| 23:51.05 | herlo | oh |
| 23:51.29 | herlo | Zelut: you can just go to superbowlcommercials.com in a day or so... |
| 23:55.48 | herlo | IIRC |
| 23:55.48 | Zelut | and the bears score again. I didn't expect this to be this good |
| 23:57.31 | herlo | the game was supposed to be high scoring |