| 00:09.57 | openbees | how to uninstall wingide |
| 00:32.12 | *** part/#storm magmatt (~Matt@74-92-245-181-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 02:10.06 | *** part/#storm openbees (~thevees@117.199.113.148) |
| 02:20.36 | *** join/#storm gary_poster (~anonymous@99-98-191-175.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net) |
| 02:44.41 | *** join/#storm wallyworld (~quassel@27-33-46-253.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 04:07.33 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@canonical/launchpad/stub) |
| 04:08.47 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@125.24.153.86.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net) |
| 04:08.51 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@canonical/launchpad/stub) |
| 04:57.23 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@125.24.118.249.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net) |
| 04:57.23 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@canonical/launchpad/stub) |
| 05:22.37 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@canonical/launchpad/stub) |
| 07:02.02 | *** join/#storm wallyworld (~quassel@27-33-46-253.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 08:12.21 | *** join/#storm mgedmin (~mg@Maemo/community/contributor/mgedmin) |
| 08:51.44 | *** join/#storm bigjools (~quassel@82-71-93-254.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk) |
| 08:51.44 | *** join/#storm bigjools (~quassel@canonical/launchpad/bigjools) |
| 11:56.18 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@canonical/launchpad/stub) |
| 12:06.29 | *** join/#storm niemeyer (~niemeyer@201-40-138-161.pltce701.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 12:35.48 | *** join/#storm jdobrien (~john@80.66.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com) |
| 12:36.15 | *** join/#storm fcorrea (~fcorrea@187.3.29.221) |
| 12:40.14 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@125.24.152.64.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net) |
| 12:40.14 | *** join/#storm stub (~stub@canonical/launchpad/stub) |
| 12:59.37 | *** join/#storm gary_poster_ (~anonymous@99-98-191-175.lightspeed.rlghnc.sbcglobal.net) |
| 15:13.06 | *** join/#storm zmijunkie (~sascha@i59F5DAA7.versanet.de) |
| 15:20.35 | mr_blue | hi |
| 15:21.36 | mr_blue | hi all |
| 15:21.51 | mr_blue | thanks for answer of my last question :) |
| 15:22.43 | mr_blue | another one : What is the difference between stormObject.delete() and stormStore.remove(stormObject) |
| 15:23.28 | therve | mr_blue, the second one exists :) |
| 15:24.49 | *** join/#storm webmaven (~webmaven@c-68-49-170-15.hsd1.dc.comcast.net) |
| 15:27.05 | mr_blue | therve: :) nice difference thanks |
| 15:29.35 | mr_blue | @therve : what about this : storm.sqlobject.SQLObjectBase.html#delete |
| 15:30.28 | therve | mr_blue, it's when you use the sqlobject layer, I don't think that's what you're doing |
| 15:34.04 | mr_blue | yes you're right. But what is sqlobject used for in storm ? |
| 15:34.41 | jkakar | mr_blue: It's a compatibility layer for users of SQLObject. |
| 15:35.02 | jkakar | mr_blue: And it's really only used by Launchpad... it's very unlikely that it'll be interesting to you. |
| 15:38.25 | mr_blue | Thanks jkakar, i'am jusr curious. I am happy with storm : |
| 15:38.27 | mr_blue | :) |
| 15:45.44 | *** join/#storm marienz (~marienz@freenode/staff/marienz) |
| 15:52.13 | *** join/#storm niemeyer (~niemeyer@201-40-138-161.pltce701.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 16:05.59 | *** join/#storm niemeyer (~niemeyer@201-2-134-248.pltce701.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 16:09.10 | *** join/#storm jdobrien (~john@80.66.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com) |
| 16:18.09 | *** join/#storm magmatt (~Matt@74-92-245-181-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 16:22.49 | *** part/#storm magmatt (~Matt@74-92-245-181-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 16:57.02 | *** join/#storm jdobrien (~john@12.139.146.131) |
| 17:16.35 | *** join/#storm magmatt (~Matt@74-92-245-181-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 17:17.40 | *** join/#storm webmaven (~webmaven@enki.sunlightfoundation.com) |
| 18:10.26 | *** join/#storm jdobrien (~john@12.186.157.74) |
| 18:52.41 | *** part/#storm magmatt (~Matt@74-92-245-181-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 19:51.54 | *** join/#storm keppla (~keppla@i577B0D5A.versanet.de) |
| 19:56.45 | *** join/#storm magmatt (~Matt@74-92-245-181-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 20:04.12 | *** join/#storm mats_a (~mats@18.111.112.17) |
| 20:06.06 | mats_a | hi; is there a way to automatically have ReferenceSets defined, to avoid repeating code? or is there a reason we would not want to have it automatically dealt with? |
| 20:07.13 | mats_a | was looking for somethiing like sqlAlchemy's oneToMany declaration; or is it left to the user to create such an abstraction layer if desired? |
| 20:11.26 | *** join/#storm keppla (~keppla@i577B0D5A.versanet.de) |
| 20:20.16 | *** join/#storm jdobrien (~john@80.66.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com) |
| 20:24.45 | *** join/#storm keppla (~keppla@i577B0D5A.versanet.de) |
| 21:22.39 | jkakar | mats_a: Nope, Storm doesn't know anything about your schema other than what you define on your classes (which is a conscious design decision). |
| 21:23.01 | jkakar | mats_a: Basically, Reference's and ReferenceSet's are the abstraction layer you're expected to use. |
| 23:04.31 | *** join/#storm mats_a (~mats@18.111.112.17) |
| 23:16.13 | mats_a | jkakar: thanks, I understand; I like the lightweight design choices =) -- was just making sure there wasn't an abstraction layer I was missing, or a common third-party layer built on top of Storm |
| 23:16.56 | mats_a | thanks for the reply |
| 23:22.58 | marienz | 2/16 |
| 23:23.01 | marienz | bah, sorry |
| 23:36.41 | *** part/#storm magmatt (~Matt@74-92-245-181-Utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 23:38.53 | *** join/#storm fcorrea (~fcorrea@189-54-100-52-nd.cpe.vivax.com.br) |