| 00:00.15 | *** join/#storm wallflower (n=wallflow@ip-205-246-113-216.pool.grokthis.net) |
| 03:45.54 | *** join/#storm bigdog (n=scmikes@72-197-8-8-arpa.cust.cinci.current.net) |
| 04:14.05 | *** join/#storm Brend (n=brendonh@218-170-231-196.dynamic.hinet.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:14.05 | *** join/#storm vinsci (n=vinsci@unaffiliated/vinsci) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:20.40 | *** join/#storm Brend (n=brendonh@218-170-231-196.dynamic.hinet.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:20.40 | *** join/#storm vinsci (n=vinsci@unaffiliated/vinsci) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:50.35 | *** join/#storm jml_ (n=jml@ppp121-44-27-167.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net) |
| 05:47.27 | *** join/#storm jukart (n=jukart@lsfw01.lovelysystems.com) |
| 06:15.52 | *** join/#storm goschtl (n=goschtl@p5B0BDA23.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 06:21.09 | *** join/#storm adedov (n=adedov@gw-swsoft2.ll-nsk.zsttk.ru) |
| 06:21.44 | adedov | hi! is there any possibility using storm with python 2.3? |
| 06:32.59 | jamesh | adedov: not without rewriting a large portion of it |
| 06:33.21 | jamesh | adedov: the expression compiler makes heavy use of the decorator syntax introduced in Python 2.4 |
| 06:33.52 | adedov | jamesh: thank you. |
| 06:33.55 | *** part/#storm adedov (n=adedov@gw-swsoft2.ll-nsk.zsttk.ru) |
| 07:00.23 | *** join/#storm dobee (n=dobeee@lsfw01.lovelysystems.com) |
| 12:17.16 | *** join/#storm jamesh (n=james@canonical/launchpad/jamesh) |
| 12:38.57 | *** join/#storm niemeyer (n=niemeyer@200-103-245-169.ctame705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 14:00.47 | *** join/#storm bigdog (n=scmikes@72-197-8-8-arpa.cust.cinci.current.net) |
| 14:07.11 | *** join/#storm goschtl (n=goschtl@p5B0BDA23.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 16:02.30 | *** join/#storm jukart (n=jukart@85-124-221-45.static.xdsl-line.inode.at) |
| 16:23.45 | *** join/#storm michelp_ (n=michelp@69-30-72-119.dq1sf.easystreet.com) |
| 16:39.08 | *** join/#storm michelp_ (n=michelp@69-30-72-119.dq1sf.easystreet.com) |
| 17:31.50 | *** join/#storm jukart (n=jukart@85-124-221-45.static.xdsl-line.inode.at) |
| 17:33.31 | *** join/#storm dobee (n=dobeee@85-124-200-100.static.xdsl-line.inode.at) |
| 19:15.58 | *** join/#storm bigdo1 (n=scmikes@72-197-8-8-arpa.cust.cinci.current.net) |
| 20:34.22 | *** join/#storm hagna (n=hagna@70.102.57.178) |
| 20:34.34 | hagna | does storm support is_not_in() ? |
| 20:38.17 | radix | hagna: Not(In()) |
| 20:38.28 | hagna | radix: ahhh |
| 20:38.37 | radix | although I don't know if there's a convenience for that for column methods |
| 20:39.28 | hagna | radix: Not(In(id == 1, id == 2)) |
| 20:39.30 | hagna | ? |
| 20:39.41 | radix | hagna: that looks a bit weird |
| 20:39.42 | hagna | or id.Not(In(1, 2)) |
| 20:39.47 | radix | yeah that makes more sense |
| 20:39.51 | radix | except In probably takes a list, not *args |
| 20:39.58 | hagna | oh yeah |
| 20:40.01 | radix | err, sorry, no |
| 20:40.06 | hagna | no? |
| 20:40.07 | radix | slows down |
| 20:40.12 | radix | Not isn't a method, it's a class |
| 20:40.21 | hagna | huh |
| 20:40.31 | radix | ok, now I remember |
| 20:40.39 | radix | Not(column.is_in([1, 2])) |
| 20:40.46 | hagna | oh ok |
| 20:40.59 | radix | get Not with 'from storm.locals import Not' |
| 20:41.28 | hagna | is that new? |
| 20:41.38 | hagna | ImportError: cannot import name Not |
| 20:42.48 | *** join/#storm michelp_ (n=michelp@69-30-72-119.dq1sf.easystreet.com) |
| 20:44.16 | hagna | I'm on 0.10 |
| 20:47.57 | hagna | hagna: I'm on 0.12 |
| 20:48.04 | hagna | radix: Not is there |
| 21:06.40 | radix | hagna: from storm.expr import Not, then |
| 21:06.49 | hagna | oh I upgraded too late |
| 21:06.55 | radix | ok, great :) |
| 21:09.38 | hagna | radix: hmmm this is odd a.st.find(Bug, Bug.bug_id.is_in([1248]) & Not(Bug.bug_id.is_in([]))) |
| 21:09.45 | hagna | returns an empty results set |
| 21:10.09 | hagna | oh no wait that makes sense |
| 21:10.13 | radix | heh |
| 21:10.48 | radix | "not in []" is a pretty strange thing, in any case |
| 21:11.26 | hagna | it's a default empty exclude list |
| 21:11.51 | hagna | mayby I really want minus |
| 21:11.55 | hagna | oops |
| 21:16.38 | *** join/#storm bigdog (n=scmikes@72-197-8-8-arpa.cust.cinci.current.net) |
| 21:18.09 | hagna | not in [] should be everything |
| 21:18.15 | hagna | radix: isn't it? |
| 21:18.41 | radix | hagna: "not in []" means "True" |
| 21:19.03 | hagna | a.st.find(Bug, Bug.bug_status.is_in([u'NEW']) & Not(Bug.bug_id.is_in([]))) |
| 21:19.04 | hagna | is empty |
| 21:19.10 | hagna | it should be all new bugs |
| 21:20.04 | hagna | a.st.find(Bug, Bug.bug_status.is_in([u'NEW']) & True) |
| 21:20.08 | hagna | is full of all new bugs |
| 21:20.45 | hagna | radix: that Not(...) expr must be False |
| 21:23.11 | *** join/#storm Fujitsu (n=fujitsu@ubuntu/member/fujitsu) |
| 21:31.23 | hagna | radix: this is not being intuitive |
| 21:31.34 | radix | I would feel better if you were using commas instead of & |
| 21:31.58 | hagna | radix: ok |
| 21:32.13 | radix | passing True to store.find is pretty pointless |
| 21:32.28 | radix | why aren't you just doing store.find(Bug, Bug.bug_status.is_in([u"NEW"])) ? |
| 21:32.47 | hagna | radix: so I can have an optional list of bug_ids to ignore |
| 21:33.02 | radix | hagna: do it like this |
| 21:33.05 | radix | if exclude: |
| 21:33.05 | hagna | a.st.find(Bug, And(Bug.bug_status.is_in([u'NEW']), Not(Bug.bug_id.is_in([])))) |
| 21:33.07 | hagna | is also empty |
| 21:33.13 | radix | <PROTECTED> |
| 21:33.14 | hagna | radix: oh ok go ahead |
| 21:33.18 | radix | st.find(Bug, *qry) |
| 21:33.58 | hagna | ok I'll try that |