| 00:00.15 | *** join/#storm wallflower (n=wallflow@ip-205-246-113-216.pool.grokthis.net) |
| 00:35.19 | *** join/#storm WebMaven (n=webmaven@nv-65-173-64-133.dhcp.embarqhsd.net) |
| 01:13.51 | *** join/#storm darrylcousins (n=darrylco@125-237-160-189.jetstream.xtra.co.nz) |
| 01:42.11 | radix | jamesh: we beat you to it by about half a day ;-) |
| 01:42.46 | jamesh | radix: but I have access to fix it :) |
| 01:44.14 | radix | woot |
| 01:44.28 | radix | jamesh: did you notice the other example I put in the ticket? Hopefully it's one that doesn't exist any more |
| 01:44.41 | radix | but it's curious in that it doesn't match up with "ERROR: " or "WARNING: " |
| 01:45.23 | jamesh | radix: it matches up with "ERROR: " (two spaces) |
| 02:01.52 | jamesh | radix: sorry. Which ticket is this? |
| 02:04.22 | radix | jamesh: the reconnection ticket |
| 02:05.03 | jamesh | ah. "bug" |
| 02:05.26 | jamesh | thought you might be talking about a ticket in psycopg's trac instance |
| 02:28.11 | radix | jamesh: it doesn't look like it matches up to me |
| 02:28.16 | radix | "no connection to the server" |
| 02:28.38 | radix | if you have "ERROR:" with no space then it fits up with the "nection to the server" |
| 02:37.07 | jamesh | radix: right. but it does match up with "lost connection to server" |
| 02:39.21 | radix | hmm. was there a "lost connection to the server"? |
| 02:43.04 | jamesh | dunno, but the number of characters matches ;) |
| 02:44.40 | jamesh | hrrm |
| 02:45.05 | jamesh | there isn't a string like that in libpq |
| 03:55.18 | *** join/#storm trisiak (n=tree@chello084010084214.chello.pl) |
| 05:52.52 | *** join/#storm jukart (n=jukart@85-124-221-45.static.xdsl-line.inode.at) |
| 06:52.08 | *** join/#storm jukart (n=jukart@194.183.146.181) |
| 07:00.38 | *** join/#storm michelp (n=michelp@69-30-72-119.dq1sf.easystreet.com) |
| 07:35.49 | *** join/#storm dobee (n=dobeee@194.183.146.186) |
| 08:07.10 | *** join/#storm goschtl (n=goschtl@p5495CEE2.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 09:14.05 | *** join/#storm Raumkraut (n=Raumkrau@cust227-dsl44.idnet.net) |
| 09:14.34 | Raumkraut | How might one go about discarding an in-memory sqlite db, and creating another |
| 09:14.36 | Raumkraut | ? |
| 09:15.00 | Raumkraut | is it just a matter of Store.close()? |
| 09:16.16 | Raumkraut | at the moment I'm del()ing and re-doing the result of create_database() as well |
| 09:17.14 | Raumkraut | just in case ;) |
| 09:36.43 | *** join/#storm mcella (n=michele@ip-171-30.sn3.eutelia.it) |
| 10:53.09 | *** join/#storm dobee (n=dobeee@194.183.146.186) |
| 11:20.14 | *** join/#storm dobee (n=dobeee@194.183.146.186) |
| 11:22.04 | *** join/#storm niemeyer (n=niemeyer@201-10-91-193.ctame705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br) |
| 11:59.10 | *** join/#storm jukart (n=jukart@85-124-221-45.static.xdsl-line.inode.at) |
| 12:27.05 | *** join/#storm Key_Gena (i=lok@gateway/tor/x-2c7a19d35dfc3359) |
| 12:44.10 | *** join/#storm Zenom_ (n=aj1973@24.33.247.133) |
| 12:57.38 | *** join/#storm Zenom_ (n=aj1973@24.33.247.133) |
| 13:25.07 | *** join/#storm Zenom (n=aj1973@unaffiliated/aj1973) |
| 14:32.59 | *** join/#storm bigdog (n=scmikes@72-197-8-8-arpa.cust.cinci.current.net) |
| 16:46.33 | *** join/#storm jamesh (n=james@canonical/launchpad/jamesh) |
| 16:56.33 | jkakar | Raumkraut: Does it work? Does the new store end up with an empty SQLite database or do tables created with a previous store persist? |
| 17:01.27 | radix | I'm pretty sure create_database("sqlite:") should create a totally fresh in-memory database every time |
| 17:05.04 | niemeyer | Right |
| 17:05.12 | niemeyer | Oh, wait |
| 17:05.20 | niemeyer | Well.. yeah.. :-) |
| 17:05.47 | niemeyer | We don't do anything special in this case.. everytime we connect with sqlite to an in-memory database we get a different database |
| 17:06.39 | radix | oh right, and since every store creates its own connection, I guess you don't even need to call create_database again |
| 17:11.26 | jkakar | Does that mean you can have multiple in-memory SQLite databases at the same time? Or just that creating a connection to an in-memory SQLite database b0rks whatever's already there? |
| 17:13.23 | radix | jkakar: you can have multiple I think. |
| 17:13.50 | jkakar | radix: Oh, huh. Neat. |
| 17:23.52 | Zenom | happy thanksgiving guys |
| 17:24.05 | Zenom | even though you guys might not be in the us :) |
| 17:24.10 | Zenom | happy day then hehe |
| 17:27.15 | jkakar | :) |
| 17:42.20 | niemeyer | Zenom: Yeah, not really, but thanks anyway :) |
| 17:43.41 | Zenom | yeah i figured since you guys were all in here talking that you were not from the us |
| 17:43.49 | Zenom | but figured I would wish you well anyhow :) |
| 17:46.30 | *** join/#storm dobee (n=dobeee@81-223-53-162.dornbirn.xdsl-line.inode.at) |
| 18:05.30 | Raumkraut | Okay cool, so Store.close() is all that's necessary |
| 18:06.15 | Raumkraut | I'm assuming it's also enough to allow the gc to free up the memory too |
| 21:43.28 | *** join/#storm WebMaven_ (n=webmaven@nv-65-173-64-133.dhcp.embarqhsd.net) |
| 21:58.04 | *** join/#storm jukart (n=jukart@85-124-221-45.static.xdsl-line.inode.at) |