| 00:48.45 | *** join/#silvercat orange (n=mdw@pdpc/supporter/basic/orange) |
| 00:48.45 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o orange] by ChanServ |
| 03:21.50 | *** join/#silvercat JBdiGriz (n=jbdigriz@ip-207-145-49-78.sjc.megapath.net) |
| 03:39.48 | *** join/#silvercat Pimpinella (n=frank@p54819513.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 03:39.48 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o Pimpinella] by ChanServ |
| 03:51.16 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 03:51.16 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 04:25.30 | *** join/#silvercat SportChick (n=SportChi@ca-redbch-cuda1-c3b-a-40.stmnca.adelphia.net) |
| 04:25.30 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o SportChick] by ChanServ |
| 06:27.24 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v SilverFox-work] by SportChick |
| 06:27.28 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v JBdiGriz] by SportChick |
| 06:27.37 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v brad2901] by SportChick |
| 06:27.42 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v eXtreme] by SportChick |
| 06:53.41 | *** join/#silvercat jomojo (n=jomojo@c-24-17-68-130.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 06:53.43 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o jomojo] by ChanServ |
| 07:05.31 | *** join/#silvercat _Manu_ (n=_jujibo@98.Red-80-36-59.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 07:06.36 | *** join/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:15.20 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:15.20 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 07:16.03 | *** part/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:16.29 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:16.29 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 07:16.57 | *** mode/#silvercat [-z] by silverfox |
| 07:17.18 | *** mode/#silvercat [-R] by silverfox |
| 08:27.22 | silverfox | how do you give a process you start a lower cpu priority? I don't care how long it takes to run, and don't want it sucking up cpu. |
| 08:28.00 | _Manu_ | try the command "nice" |
| 08:28.21 | _Manu_ | nice 3 command |
| 08:28.40 | _Manu_ | -n 3 :) |
| 08:28.58 | silverfox | what's the range? |
| 08:29.01 | silverfox | 0 - 10? |
| 08:29.04 | silverfox | 5 being normal? |
| 08:33.50 | _Manu_ | 10 is the default |
| 08:33.52 | silverfox | ah, -20 to 19 |
| 08:34.01 | _Manu_ | lower is lower priority |
| 08:34.10 | silverfox | Run COMMAND with an adjusted scheduling priority. With no COMMAND, print the current scheduling priority. ADJUST is 10 by default. Range goes from -20 (high- |
| 08:34.10 | silverfox | <PROTECTED> |
| 08:34.12 | silverfox | ??? |
| 08:34.13 | _Manu_ | I usually when run a command in the server use nice -n 2 command |
| 08:34.55 | _Manu_ | then use 19 |
| 08:35.10 | _Manu_ | I was talking about freebsd |
| 08:36.31 | _Manu_ | in Freebsd iirc it was from 0 to 10 |
| 08:36.57 | silverfox | i see. |
| 08:37.13 | silverfox | you'd think these folks could stay on the same page... |
| 08:37.21 | _Manu_ | heh |
| 08:37.23 | silverfox | or at least not invert the book! |
| 08:37.50 | _Manu_ | well I think 0 lower and 10 higher is better than -20 to 19 no? |
| 08:38.03 | silverfox | yeah, makes sense to me. |
| 08:38.21 | silverfox | -20 to 19 is ok, if lower means lower, and higher means higher... |
| 08:38.21 | _Manu_ | -20 to 19 is like a sleep parameter :) |
| 08:38.33 | _Manu_ | yes, but it's the reverse |
| 08:39.15 | _Manu_ | but no matter, no you can give a lower priority :) |
| 08:39.24 | _Manu_ | s/no/now |
| 09:53.22 | silverfox | http://silvercat.bzflag.org/page16.html |
| 11:36.42 | *** join/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 00:48.45 | *** join/#silvercat orange (n=mdw@pdpc/supporter/basic/orange) |
| 00:48.45 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o orange] by ChanServ |
| 03:21.50 | *** join/#silvercat JBdiGriz (n=jbdigriz@ip-207-145-49-78.sjc.megapath.net) |
| 03:39.48 | *** join/#silvercat Pimpinella (n=frank@p54819513.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 03:39.48 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o Pimpinella] by ChanServ |
| 03:51.16 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 03:51.16 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 04:25.30 | *** join/#silvercat SportChick (n=SportChi@ca-redbch-cuda1-c3b-a-40.stmnca.adelphia.net) |
| 04:25.30 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o SportChick] by ChanServ |
| 06:27.24 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v SilverFox-work] by SportChick |
| 06:27.28 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v JBdiGriz] by SportChick |
| 06:27.37 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v brad2901] by SportChick |
| 06:27.42 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v eXtreme] by SportChick |
| 06:53.41 | *** join/#silvercat jomojo (n=jomojo@c-24-17-68-130.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 06:53.43 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o jomojo] by ChanServ |
| 07:05.31 | *** join/#silvercat _Manu_ (n=_jujibo@98.Red-80-36-59.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 07:06.36 | *** join/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:15.20 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:15.20 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 07:16.03 | *** part/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:16.29 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:16.29 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 07:16.57 | *** mode/#silvercat [-z] by silverfox |
| 07:17.18 | *** mode/#silvercat [-R] by silverfox |
| 08:27.22 | silverfox | how do you give a process you start a lower cpu priority? I don't care how long it takes to run, and don't want it sucking up cpu. |
| 08:28.00 | _Manu_ | try the command "nice" |
| 08:28.21 | _Manu_ | nice 3 command |
| 08:28.40 | _Manu_ | -n 3 :) |
| 08:28.58 | silverfox | what's the range? |
| 08:29.01 | silverfox | 0 - 10? |
| 08:29.04 | silverfox | 5 being normal? |
| 08:33.50 | _Manu_ | 10 is the default |
| 08:33.52 | silverfox | ah, -20 to 19 |
| 08:34.01 | _Manu_ | lower is lower priority |
| 08:34.10 | silverfox | Run COMMAND with an adjusted scheduling priority. With no COMMAND, print the current scheduling priority. ADJUST is 10 by default. Range goes from -20 (high- |
| 08:34.10 | silverfox | <PROTECTED> |
| 08:34.12 | silverfox | ??? |
| 08:34.13 | _Manu_ | I usually when run a command in the server use nice -n 2 command |
| 08:34.55 | _Manu_ | then use 19 |
| 08:35.10 | _Manu_ | I was talking about freebsd |
| 08:36.31 | _Manu_ | in Freebsd iirc it was from 0 to 10 |
| 08:36.57 | silverfox | i see. |
| 08:37.13 | silverfox | you'd think these folks could stay on the same page... |
| 08:37.21 | _Manu_ | heh |
| 08:37.23 | silverfox | or at least not invert the book! |
| 08:37.50 | _Manu_ | well I think 0 lower and 10 higher is better than -20 to 19 no? |
| 08:38.03 | silverfox | yeah, makes sense to me. |
| 08:38.21 | silverfox | -20 to 19 is ok, if lower means lower, and higher means higher... |
| 08:38.21 | _Manu_ | -20 to 19 is like a sleep parameter :) |
| 08:38.33 | _Manu_ | yes, but it's the reverse |
| 08:39.15 | _Manu_ | but no matter, no you can give a lower priority :) |
| 08:39.24 | _Manu_ | s/no/now |
| 09:53.22 | silverfox | http://silvercat.bzflag.org/page16.html |
| 11:36.42 | *** join/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 11:38.19 | *** join/#silvercat eXtreme (n=foo@unaffiliated/brad2901) |
| 11:38.19 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v eXtreme] by irc.freenode.net |
| 11:55.18 | *** join/#silvercat Birdie (n=Birdie__@d54C34DE9.access.telenet.be) |
| 11:55.18 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o Birdie] by ChanServ |
| 13:45.38 | *** join/#silvercat brad2901 (i=brad@unaffiliated/brad2901) |
| 14:41.25 | *** join/#silvercat ToughShooter (n=ts@p54B03250.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 14:41.26 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o ToughShooter] by ChanServ |
| 15:04.45 | *** join/#silvercat SportChick (n=SportChi@ca-redbch-cuda1-c3b-a-40.stmnca.adelphia.net) |
| 15:04.45 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o SportChick] by ChanServ |
| 16:03.59 | *** join/#silvercat JBdiGriz (n=jbdigriz@ip-207-145-49-78.sjc.megapath.net) |
| 16:23.31 | *** join/#silvercat CBG (n=CBG@cpc2-stme1-5-1-cust130.cdif.cable.ntl.com) |
| 17:16.44 | *** part/#silvercat JBdiGriz (n=jbdigriz@ip-207-145-49-78.sjc.megapath.net) |
| 00:48.45 | *** join/#silvercat orange (n=mdw@pdpc/supporter/basic/orange) |
| 00:48.45 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o orange] by ChanServ |
| 03:21.50 | *** join/#silvercat JBdiGriz (n=jbdigriz@ip-207-145-49-78.sjc.megapath.net) |
| 03:39.48 | *** join/#silvercat Pimpinella (n=frank@p54819513.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 03:39.48 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o Pimpinella] by ChanServ |
| 03:51.16 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 03:51.16 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 04:25.30 | *** join/#silvercat SportChick (n=SportChi@ca-redbch-cuda1-c3b-a-40.stmnca.adelphia.net) |
| 04:25.30 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o SportChick] by ChanServ |
| 06:27.24 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v SilverFox-work] by SportChick |
| 06:27.28 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v JBdiGriz] by SportChick |
| 06:27.37 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v brad2901] by SportChick |
| 06:27.42 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v eXtreme] by SportChick |
| 06:53.41 | *** join/#silvercat jomojo (n=jomojo@c-24-17-68-130.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 06:53.43 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o jomojo] by ChanServ |
| 07:05.31 | *** join/#silvercat _Manu_ (n=_jujibo@98.Red-80-36-59.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 07:06.36 | *** join/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:15.20 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:15.20 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 07:16.03 | *** part/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:16.29 | *** join/#silvercat silverfox (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 07:16.29 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o silverfox] by ChanServ |
| 07:16.57 | *** mode/#silvercat [-z] by silverfox |
| 07:17.18 | *** mode/#silvercat [-R] by silverfox |
| 08:27.22 | silverfox | how do you give a process you start a lower cpu priority? I don't care how long it takes to run, and don't want it sucking up cpu. |
| 08:28.00 | _Manu_ | try the command "nice" |
| 08:28.21 | _Manu_ | nice 3 command |
| 08:28.40 | _Manu_ | -n 3 :) |
| 08:28.58 | silverfox | what's the range? |
| 08:29.01 | silverfox | 0 - 10? |
| 08:29.04 | silverfox | 5 being normal? |
| 08:33.50 | _Manu_ | 10 is the default |
| 08:33.52 | silverfox | ah, -20 to 19 |
| 08:34.01 | _Manu_ | lower is lower priority |
| 08:34.10 | silverfox | Run COMMAND with an adjusted scheduling priority. With no COMMAND, print the current scheduling priority. ADJUST is 10 by default. Range goes from -20 (high- |
| 08:34.10 | silverfox | <PROTECTED> |
| 08:34.12 | silverfox | ??? |
| 08:34.13 | _Manu_ | I usually when run a command in the server use nice -n 2 command |
| 08:34.55 | _Manu_ | then use 19 |
| 08:35.10 | _Manu_ | I was talking about freebsd |
| 08:36.31 | _Manu_ | in Freebsd iirc it was from 0 to 10 |
| 08:36.57 | silverfox | i see. |
| 08:37.13 | silverfox | you'd think these folks could stay on the same page... |
| 08:37.21 | _Manu_ | heh |
| 08:37.23 | silverfox | or at least not invert the book! |
| 08:37.50 | _Manu_ | well I think 0 lower and 10 higher is better than -20 to 19 no? |
| 08:38.03 | silverfox | yeah, makes sense to me. |
| 08:38.21 | silverfox | -20 to 19 is ok, if lower means lower, and higher means higher... |
| 08:38.21 | _Manu_ | -20 to 19 is like a sleep parameter :) |
| 08:38.33 | _Manu_ | yes, but it's the reverse |
| 08:39.15 | _Manu_ | but no matter, no you can give a lower priority :) |
| 08:39.24 | _Manu_ | s/no/now |
| 09:53.22 | silverfox | http://silvercat.bzflag.org/page16.html |
| 11:36.42 | *** join/#silvercat silverfx (i=vircuser@65-127-8-53.dia.cust.qwest.net) |
| 11:38.19 | *** join/#silvercat eXtreme (n=foo@unaffiliated/brad2901) |
| 11:38.19 | *** mode/#silvercat [+v eXtreme] by irc.freenode.net |
| 11:55.18 | *** join/#silvercat Birdie (n=Birdie__@d54C34DE9.access.telenet.be) |
| 11:55.18 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o Birdie] by ChanServ |
| 13:45.38 | *** join/#silvercat brad2901 (i=brad@unaffiliated/brad2901) |
| 14:41.25 | *** join/#silvercat ToughShooter (n=ts@p54B03250.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 14:41.26 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o ToughShooter] by ChanServ |
| 15:04.45 | *** join/#silvercat SportChick (n=SportChi@ca-redbch-cuda1-c3b-a-40.stmnca.adelphia.net) |
| 15:04.45 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o SportChick] by ChanServ |
| 16:03.59 | *** join/#silvercat JBdiGriz (n=jbdigriz@ip-207-145-49-78.sjc.megapath.net) |
| 16:23.31 | *** join/#silvercat CBG (n=CBG@cpc2-stme1-5-1-cust130.cdif.cable.ntl.com) |
| 17:16.44 | *** part/#silvercat JBdiGriz (n=jbdigriz@ip-207-145-49-78.sjc.megapath.net) |
| 18:59.13 | *** join/#silvercat _Manu_ (n=_jujibo@98.Red-80-36-59.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 19:07.11 | *** join/#silvercat SC (n=SportChi@ca-redbch-cuda1-c3b-a-40.stmnca.adelphia.net) |
| 19:30.03 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o SportChick] by ChanServ |
| 20:32.54 | *** part/#silvercat ToughShooter (n=ts@p54B03250.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 20:33.11 | *** join/#silvercat ToughShooter (n=ts@p54B03250.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 20:33.11 | *** mode/#silvercat [+o ToughShooter] by ChanServ |
| 21:01.00 | *** join/#silvercat TD-Linux (n=TD-Linux@24-159-197-101.dhcp.roch.mn.charter.com) |