| 00:16.35 | *** join/#qi-hardware Ornotermes (~ornoterme@78-67-39-53-no180.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 00:25.32 | *** join/#qi-hardware fdcx (357@ceata/consiliu/FDCX) |
| 00:32.45 | *** join/#qi-hardware Ornotermes (~ornoterme@78-67-39-53-no180.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 00:47.39 | *** join/#qi-hardware Ornotermes (~ornoterme@78-67-39-53-no180.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 00:56.10 | *** join/#qi-hardware Ornotermes (~ornoterme@78-67-39-53-no180.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 01:02.50 | DocScrutinizer05 | hmm, shouldn't |
| 01:03.14 | *** join/#qi-hardware Ornotermes (~ornoterme@78-67-39-53-no180.tbcn.telia.com) |
| 01:03.25 | DocScrutinizer05 | I don't see any loop without hard termination condition |
| 01:04.41 | DocScrutinizer05 | it either terminates after SAMPLES loops, or it moves Vc1 to max or min |
| 01:05.46 | DocScrutinizer05 | only oscillation could cause endless looping, like with every iterating function that doesn't converge |
| 01:09.32 | DocScrutinizer05 | actually when i loops get more rather then less, you're not converging and tend towards oscillation or saturation. As a safeguard you could decrease the feedback (size of INCREMENT) in such case, each time i loopcount N > i loopcount N-1 |
| 01:09.42 | DocScrutinizer05 | err < of course |
| 01:10.47 | DocScrutinizer05 | actually when i loops get less rather than more, you're not converging and tend towards oscillation or saturation. As a safeguard you could decrease the feedback (size of INCREMENT) in such case, each time i loopcount N < i loopcount N-1 |
| 01:13.23 | DocScrutinizer05 | you prolly start with one loop for i, and you should end with SAMPLES loops for i. When the number of i loops per iteration is not monotonically increasing, the algo is in trouble (though I can't fugure how that could happen when you don't increase feedback beyond factor 1) |
| 01:42.02 | *** join/#qi-hardware xiangfu (~xiangfu@111.198.29.53) |
| 01:49.06 | *** join/#qi-hardware fengling (~fengling@111.198.29.53) |
| 02:03.51 | *** join/#qi-hardware rjeffries (~rjeffries@pool-74-106-217-43.snloca.dsl-w.verizon.net) |
| 02:11.41 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@111.198.29.53) |
| 02:45.03 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@122.133.52.113.static.ximdns.com) |
| 03:37.15 | *** join/#qi-hardware dandon (~dandon@88.151.75.149) |
| 03:39.37 | *** join/#qi-hardware DocScrutinizer05 (~saturn@openmoko/engineers/joerg) |
| 03:51.37 | *** join/#qi-hardware xiangfu (~xiangfu@111.198.29.53) |
| 04:17.57 | *** join/#qi-hardware fdcx (357@ceata/consiliu/FDCX) |
| 06:21.26 | *** join/#qi-hardware pigeons (~pigeons@94.242.209.214) |
| 07:36.31 | *** join/#qi-hardware sandeepkr_ (~sandeep@111.235.64.4) |
| 09:17.33 | *** join/#qi-hardware sandeepkr_ (~sandeep@111.235.64.4) |
| 10:03.22 | *** join/#qi-hardware sb0 (~lekernel@123202036228.ctinets.com) |
| 14:24.02 | *** join/#qi-hardware doomlord (~textual@host217-42-162-151.range217-42.btcentralplus.com) |
| 14:39.38 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~pcercuei@2a03:a680:2020:ff62:1af4:6aff:fec5:1c8f) |
| 15:07.22 | *** join/#qi-hardware wej (~j@2001:1af8:4010:a052:21::5e) |
| 15:07.33 | DocScrutinizer05 | hey THATS a fuse: /home/jr/Bilder/share-service/20150114_003.jpg |
| 15:08.29 | DocScrutinizer05 | oops |
| 15:09.33 | DocScrutinizer05 | http://maemo.cloud-7.de/share-service/20150114_001.jpg |
| 16:02.29 | *** join/#qi-hardware doomlord (~textual@host217-42-162-151.range217-42.btcentralplus.com) |
| 16:12.27 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~pcercuei@2a03:a680:2020:ff62:1af4:6aff:fec5:1c8f) |
| 16:15.50 | roh | DocScrutinizer05: hehe.. proper hv fuse in rupture proof |
| 16:16.41 | DocScrutinizer05 | Agilent DVM |
| 16:17.07 | DocScrutinizer05 | now Keysight |
| 16:17.11 | roh | well.. every cat2 or better needs that |
| 16:17.21 | roh | not sure about cat1 |
| 16:19.33 | DocScrutinizer05 | well, I've seen tons of those flimsy dia5*20mm blowfuses |
| 16:19.51 | DocScrutinizer05 | but this is a real monster compared to those |
| 16:19.55 | roh | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messkategorie pdf on the bottom |
| 16:20.52 | roh | you'll need a 1000V proof fuse to get a 600V rating i guess (cat2) ... one usually gets 1000V proof standart electrical gear nowadays (china can do that) |
| 16:21.44 | roh | afaik most recent gear we would buy is cat3 or better anyhow ;) |
| 16:23.04 | roh | i also got some meters with small 5x20 fuses... just dont use em for stuff in fuseboxes outside of a proper fused lab environment and everything should be fine |
| 16:23.42 | DocScrutinizer05 | CAT-III |
| 16:23.57 | DocScrutinizer05 | 600V |
| 16:24.26 | DocScrutinizer05 | except for the separate 10A jack |
| 16:25.19 | roh | eh.. your voltage range isnt fused usually |
| 16:25.22 | DocScrutinizer05 | IR 20kA min |
| 16:25.39 | roh | only the seperate jacks for current are |
| 16:25.41 | DocScrutinizer05 | it's a all but 10A range jack |
| 16:26.08 | DocScrutinizer05 | V Ohm µA diode capacitor temperature |
| 16:26.20 | DocScrutinizer05 | I actually dispise that a bit |
| 16:26.52 | DocScrutinizer05 | too easy to turn the dial knob from V to A |
| 16:27.22 | roh | hehe.. thats why gossen has extra jacks and a shutter |
| 16:27.50 | DocScrutinizer05 | it's only crappy Agilent ;-) |
| 16:28.09 | roh | soooo sad ;) |
| 16:28.11 | DocScrutinizer05 | U1233A |
| 16:29.57 | roh | nice. very compact |
| 16:30.59 | roh | i like the probe holders on the back |
| 16:31.34 | DocScrutinizer05 | yes, though they are less useful than you'd hope for |
| 16:31.40 | roh | oh. gotta run and move before it rains |
| 16:31.50 | DocScrutinizer05 | me too |
| 16:31.52 | roh | bbl |
| 18:03.16 | *** join/#qi-hardware doomlord (~textual@host217-42-162-151.range217-42.btcentralplus.com) |
| 18:33.12 | *** join/#qi-hardware mth (hdckmkrz@88.159.34.112) |
| 18:38.05 | *** join/#qi-hardware doomlord (~textual@host217-42-162-151.range217-42.btcentralplus.com) |
