00:59.27 | *** join/#openjtag beewoolie-afk (n=beewooli@dsl-142-026.sea.blarg.net) |
01:07.59 | ka6sox-office | hey beewoolie-afk |
01:08.43 | beewoolie-afk | hey |
01:08.57 | beewoolie-afk | I've got TAP control over the arm7 and the arm9. |
01:09.15 | beewoolie-afk | I'm waiting for a cable so I can implement tap control over the IXP42x. |
01:09.28 | ka6sox-office | w00t |
01:10.51 | beewoolie-afk | ka6sox: What do you think about AchiestDragon's gerber files? |
01:18.29 | ka6sox-office | sweeeeeeeeeeet |
01:18.43 | beewoolie-afk | Nice. |
01:19.00 | ka6sox-office | yep...working on the UCF files and VHDL framework now. |
01:58.04 | AchiestDragon | http://www.whipy.demon.co.uk/connector.pdf < think you may find this usefull |
01:59.33 | AchiestDragon | grrr , label reads port that should be vcc |
01:59.36 | AchiestDragon | 1 min |
02:02.04 | AchiestDragon | ok fixed ,,, same link |
02:08.54 | AchiestDragon | space left on that sheet as think there may be a isp/icp mode at some point also |
02:52.51 | AchiestDragon | http://www.whipy.demon.co.uk/jumpers.pdf < this also |
03:43.26 | beewoolie-afk | lennert: ? |
03:43.48 | beewoolie-afk | wookey__: I got email from one of your pals. He seems to be motivated to port APEX to your board. |
04:10.17 | *** join/#openjtag velinp (n=velinp@c88-163.cable.netissat.bg) |
04:55.53 | *** part/#openjtag velinp (n=velinp@c88-163.cable.netissat.bg) |
05:43.43 | *** join/#openjtag ByronT (n=byron-po@nslu2-linux/ByronT) |
08:20.32 | *** join/#openjtag ka6sox (n=ka6sox@nslu2-linux/ka6sox) |
11:07.15 | lennert | pong? |
11:31.26 | *** join/#openjtag vmaster (i=vmaster@p549B6243.dip.t-dialin.net) |
13:03.27 | *** join/#openjtag prpplague (n=billybob@72.22.130.37) |
14:59.16 | *** join/#openjtag Colin_ (n=colin@spr1-lanc2-6-0-cust2.asfd.broadband.ntl.com) |
15:16.19 | *** join/#openjtag toi (n=pleemans@d5152D12D.access.telenet.be) |
15:23.51 | *** join/#openjtag bullet (n=bullet@164.54.77.83.cust.bluewin.ch) |
15:29.23 | *** join/#openjtag prpplague^2 (n=billybob@69.73.206.45) |
16:16.45 | *** join/#openjtag velinp (n=velinp@c88-163.cable.netissat.bg) |
16:49.51 | *** join/#openjtag kas11 (n=kas11@244-120.8-67.tampabay.res.rr.com) |
17:20.18 | *** join/#openjtag ByronT (i=byron-po@nslu2-linux/ByronT) |
18:51.41 | *** join/#openjtag ulf_k (n=ulf_kypk@p54BD9FC1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
20:50.48 | ka6sox-office | lennert, ping |
20:54.59 | lennert | pong |
20:55.23 | ka6sox-office | for inverted signals on a UCF what notation do you use? |
20:55.44 | lennert | i don't |
20:55.55 | lennert | i asked you this question a while ago and you said there was a way.. but i've yet to hear it :) |
20:56.00 | ka6sox-office | okay so if we used RESETn |
20:56.05 | lennert | oh, right |
20:56.08 | lennert | you mean namespace |
20:56.13 | ka6sox-office | namespace |
20:56.14 | lennert | well, the xupv2p board uses _z suffix |
20:56.19 | lennert | so, clock_z |
20:56.20 | lennert | reset_z |
20:56.25 | ka6sox-office | Ive seen that way too. |
20:56.30 | lennert | you can also add an 'n' at the beginning or end |
20:56.43 | ka6sox-office | okay I'm used to both ways. |
20:56.49 | ka6sox-office | thanks. |
20:58.20 | ka6sox-office | just trying to make sure that we all agree on the notation. |
20:58.30 | ka6sox-office | (so there is no confusion) |
21:02.29 | *** join/#openjtag bullet (n=bullet@164.54.77.83.cust.bluewin.ch) |
21:45.33 | *** join/#openjtag bullet (n=bullet@164.54.77.83.cust.bluewin.ch) |
22:33.58 | *** join/#openjtag dyoung-a1ay (n=dyoung@cpe-24-94-88-62.hawaii.res.rr.com) |