| 03:38.25 | *** join/#infobot TimRiker (n=timr@rikers.org) |
| 03:38.25 | *** mode/#infobot [+o TimRiker] by ChanServ |
| 11:20.09 | troubled | hmm, we have no kick on flood built in do we :| |
| 18:32.39 | simonrvn | yes |
| 18:32.54 | simonrvn | i think |
| 18:33.42 | troubled | i dont see anything for it. the only flood settings i see are for ignoring someone who ask's something too often |
| 18:35.26 | simonrvn | yeh you're right |
| 18:35.44 | troubled | pfff, was there any doubt? ;) |
| 18:37.19 | troubled | would be nice if the bot had full blown flood protection at some point methinks |
| 18:37.57 | simonrvn | yeh |
| 19:30.42 | troubled | simonrvn: you are so warm and welcoming to trolls there :) |
| 19:30.56 | simonrvn | hehe |
| 19:32.29 | simonrvn | i feel protective of the chan, like an uncle or something |
| 19:33.44 | troubled | ill have to complain to EE/don about getting you some ops in there :) |
| 19:34.30 | troubled | ive no clue how someone like stew can get chanops and you been there longer than almost everyone and you're still not even special enough for a +v :) |
| 19:35.25 | simonrvn | i used to have chanops. ee took it away. i haven't bothered to ask for it back |
| 19:35.40 | simonrvn | afk, bbiab |
| 19:35.52 | troubled | someone was a bad boy? |
| 19:46.50 | simonrvn | there was a troll being really sexist, targetting a semi-regular at the time in particular, i told her, i'll op you and you can have the pleasure to kickban his ass (something to that effect). ee saw it, deopped me, her, and removed my access |
| 19:47.48 | troubled | heh, as nice as it is to give a user the satisfaction, you should know better :) |
| 19:47.50 | simonrvn | i haven't asked for it since. this was h, 3-ish years ago or so |
| 19:47.59 | simonrvn | s,h,oh, |
| 19:48.22 | troubled | a move like that could cause some major takeover problems :/ |
| 19:51.04 | simonrvn | and i won't. i thought about that, and other things, but i was keeping an eye on it, and was keeping my ops on, just in case, and was ready to deop anyone... also i felt that she wouldn't have abused it - if it went on longer, and people noticed, then she would've been pressured by others to get ops, but i would've acted against that, but wasn't ever going to let it go that far |
| 19:51.50 | troubled | heh, well, keeping yourself op'd doesnt mean much if you are the first person she deop's before attacking the rest of the channel |
| 19:51.51 | simonrvn | easy to say, of course, and people are often unpredictable under stress |
| 19:51.58 | troubled | nod |
| 19:52.28 | simonrvn | i don't think she even knew how, tbh. took too long for her to actually do anything |
| 19:53.09 | simonrvn | i do realise the mistake, and wouldn't do it again, but damn it was satisfying |
| 19:53.37 | troubled | you need to lrn2catalyze |
| 19:53.47 | simonrvn | but now they wouldn't even consider it, they only op DDs |
| 19:54.07 | simonrvn | i know how to catalyse ;) |
| 19:54.20 | troubled | you dont do some packaging on the side? |
| 19:54.47 | simonrvn | only local |
| 19:54.59 | troubled | oh well, their loss |
| 19:55.34 | troubled | seems like you cant go wrong with a die hard debian fan/guru who is around the channel when the chanops are sleeping |
| 19:55.48 | simonrvn | dunno how true it is, it certainly *seems* they only op DDs now |
| 19:56.14 | simonrvn | yeh, like abrotman too |
| 19:56.46 | simonrvn | and hey, i've gotten more (in)sane too :P |
| 19:57.06 | troubled | its understandable though. adding another chanop can have nasty effects. you dont know how their op status will effect the channel in the long run |
| 19:59.17 | simonrvn | well, tbh, i haven't asked because i'm not interested. i have enough rl stuff of that sort to take care of. people always talk to me about their lives, problems, in rl. the chan stuff is just stuff i don't want anything to do with, even though it would be useful to take care of some random idiot in the middle of the night $localtime |
| 20:01.13 | troubled | i know the feeling |