| 00:25.55 | *** join/#gllug hali (~hampus@ks209568.kimsufi.com) |
| 00:26.42 | *** join/#gllug w1bble (~Jamie@unaffiliated/w1bble) |
| 00:26.43 | *** join/#gllug gregoriosw_vp (~gregorios@176.126.244.125) |
| 00:26.43 | *** join/#gllug quaisi (~simon@host-92-30-48-207.as13285.net) |
| 08:43.55 | *** join/#gllug chrisp (~wibble@host109-147-230-8.range109-147.btcentralplus.com) |
| 09:10.33 | *** join/#gllug ess_tee_u (~NULL@unaffiliated/ess-tee-u/x-83456671) |
| 09:49.22 | *** join/#gllug brewdog (~geoffrey@cpc4-finc11-2-0-cust20.4-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 09:59.46 | ChoHag | Has a java daemon ever been written for which the stop process works and SIGKILL is not necessary? |
| 11:08.04 | hali | jboss? |
| 11:08.08 | hali | tomcat? |
| 11:08.33 | hali | politely stops when you issue a stop command through the management interface |
| 11:10.55 | ChoHag | Perhaps when they don't actually run any apps. |
| 11:11.08 | ChoHag | I've never seen a deployment which didn't include a hard-kill in the stop process. |
| 11:11.17 | hali | we have a number of inhouse apps running in jboss and they all work fine |
| 11:11.52 | hali | obviously undeploy and transaction management can take time to shut down |
| 11:12.17 | ChoHag | Congratulations then. |
| 11:32.39 | *** join/#gllug jpds (~jpds@ubuntu/member/jpds) |
| 12:01.49 | *** join/#gllug dick_turpin (~peter@host217-34-163-30.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 12:27.52 | *** join/#gllug Leeds (~richardc@n058153123110.netvigator.com) |
| 13:57.22 | ChoHag | When will people learn? |
| 13:57.24 | ChoHag | âHowever, although conceptually feasible, such attacks are not that easy to execute practically and to make them widespread.â |
| 13:57.34 | ChoHag | So it'll be broken in about a week then? |
| 15:17.25 | *** part/#gllug dick_turpin (~peter@host217-34-163-30.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 21:10.31 | *** join/#gllug samb1 (~samb1@turbomolecules.com) |