00:05.06 | *** join/#bzflag Agatha (~agatha@2601:681:527f:e8f0:d012:ccb8:3d14:e2c4) |
05:10.37 | *** join/#bzflag Flash (~flash@2601:280:c200:4e39:5104:2f35:d1b:5510) |
05:10.37 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v Flash] by ChanServ |
06:44.34 | *** join/#bzflag Sgeo (~Sgeo@ool-18b982ad.dyn.optonline.net) |
07:18.01 | *** join/#bzflag Agatha_ (~agatha@2601:681:527f:e8f0:d012:ccb8:3d14:e2c4) |
08:22.40 | *** join/#bzflag Foo_man_choo (~spldart@2601:2c5:c680:87a0:3210:b3ff:fef0:93af) |
10:44.27 | *** join/#bzflag blast007[m] (blast007ma@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-nzljayunbgfmtpji) |
11:14.56 | *** join/#bzflag JeffM[m] (generalpur@gateway/shell/matrix.org/x-hxgosqnbdgouriag) |
11:47.05 | blast007 | tupone: that GL2.0 branch is a LOT faster with radar on. On my GTX 1060 3GB with radar on, I went from 320 FPS to 584 FPS. The stock 2.4 client is faster with radar off, though (722 FPS stock vs 641 FPS GL2.0). |
11:51.17 | blast007 | slower on my linux though. Debian w/ Intel HD Graphics 4000 (radar on/off) stock was 121 / 152 and GL 2.0 was 60 / 144 |
11:55.29 | blast007 | Windows 10 w/ GTX 980 Ti stock 421 / 820 GL 2.0 550 / 611 |
11:57.52 | blast007 | I'll test on some additional platforms after work |
12:42.15 | *** join/#bzflag _I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
12:56.33 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
14:31.03 | blast007 | I've got two other generations of Intel iGPUs, a few generations of AMD, and an older nVidia GPU (7900 GTO) |
14:31.39 | blast007 | I'll also test on a mac mini. |
15:23.50 | *** join/#bzflag Sgeo (~Sgeo@ool-18b982ad.dyn.optonline.net) |
19:33.47 | tupone | blast007: I moved some work on GPU. If GPU is CPU I can loose some cycles :( |
19:34.01 | tupone | Is there any glitch you have found ? |
19:35.44 | tupone | Is radar setting enhanced or fast? I changed a lot for enhanced |
20:42.07 | blast007 | I didn't test too long. I'll mess around with it further. |
23:35.51 | *** join/#bzflag Zehra (~Keiki_Han@unaffiliated/zehra) |