| 00:03.54 | *** join/#bzflag Zehra (~Keiki_Han@unaffiliated/zehra) |
| 01:18.26 | *** join/#bzflag nitroxis (n@nxs.re) |
| 02:48.50 | Zehra | So quick question, how to edit/modify/delete chat messages "without swear filtering" done, since the "bz_eMessageFilteredEvent"... |
| 02:49.41 | Zehra | is listed as only occurring "whenever a message is censored by the swear filter", which is limiting to an extent. |
| 02:57.50 | CaptainRoberts[m | Thatâs what the raw chat event is for, edit it before the filter is applied. |
| 02:59.05 | Zehra | Ah, okay, thanks. |
| 02:59.25 | Zehra | Seems a bit counter-intuitive for the API, hence my confusion. |
| 02:59.57 | blast007 | how so? |
| 03:00.43 | CaptainRoberts[m | It literally says before filter in the comments on the event |
| 03:02.04 | Zehra | This is partially since it mentions "unmodified", but does not hint nor imply it is modifiable. |
| 03:02.43 | Zehra | Also creates a bit of confusion if the event is passed, would other plug-ins receive the "original" message? |
| 03:03.05 | CaptainRoberts[m | If it was immutable it would have been marked const, the entire reason for that event is to let plugins write filters |
| 03:03.46 | CaptainRoberts[m | No, itâs a chain each result goes to the next loaded, thatâs why there are two events. |
| 03:05.22 | CaptainRoberts[m | Things are modifiable in the api by default |
| 03:09.51 | Zehra | The usage of an event as both "notification" and "modification" is effective, but can cause confusion with items in sequence at times. |
| 03:11.17 | CaptainRoberts[m | Yes, that is why everyone should have a pair |
| 03:11.40 | CaptainRoberts[m | Or even 3 |
| 03:11.54 | CaptainRoberts[m | Allow, modify, notify |
| 03:14.30 | Zehra | Seems mostly reasonable, would have to check out the event flow more to be certain. |
| 03:15.04 | CaptainRoberts[m | Itâs not that hard |
| 03:17.50 | Zehra | It's not about "difficulty" or "hard" in reference to complexity, but mostly where if this is to notify original, modify, and final. |
| 03:18.20 | CaptainRoberts[m | I said should not does |
| 03:18.53 | CaptainRoberts[m | Raw chat is for modify, |
| 03:19.12 | CaptainRoberts[m | Itâs the start of the chain |
| 03:21.14 | Zehra | My confusion was simply misinterpretation, since "raw" seems as in "unmodified", regardless of what other plug-ins may or may not do. |
| 03:22.53 | Zehra | But since it is where it can be "modified", it means now either conditions set, may not be "met", despite being set. |
| 03:23.18 | CaptainRoberts[m | Yeah, raw means unmodified, has nothing to do with itâs mutability |
| 03:25.47 | Zehra | Thanks for the insights, it's appreciated. |
| 04:19.36 | *** part/#bzflag BulletCatcher (~bc@bzflag/developer/BulletCatcher) |
| 05:31.57 | *** join/#bzflag BulletCatcher (~bc@bzflag/developer/BulletCatcher) |
| 05:31.58 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v BulletCatcher] by ChanServ |
| 05:58.05 | brlcad | <PROTECTED> |
| 07:27.36 | *** join/#bzflag nitroxis (n@nxs.re) |
| 10:00.26 | *** join/#bzflag tupone (~alfredo@gentoo/developer/tupone) |
| 10:50.47 | *** join/#bzflag tupone (~alfredo@gentoo/developer/tupone) |
| 10:59.02 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 13:21.03 | moriah | man, i miss when brlcad played bz....good memories |
| 13:23.25 | Juesto | oof, yeah good memories when i played years ago |
| 13:23.31 | Juesto | not the same excitement for some reason |
| 13:35.29 | blast007 | I always miss when I play bz. Need to work on my aim. ;) |
| 13:35.49 | blast007 | think I left at like -26 yesterday |
| 13:36.41 | blast007 | though my accuracy is excellent when it's my own tank |
| 14:03.12 | short_circuit | =D |
| 14:19.40 | moriah | I'm the queen of sks...and tks, sadly |
| 15:12.54 | *** join/#bzflag Zehra (~Keiki_Han@unaffiliated/zehra) |
| 16:05.10 | *** join/#bzflag Sgeo (~Sgeo@ool-18b982ad.dyn.optonline.net) |
| 20:19.58 | CaptainRoberts[m | Zehra: solo bots share the connection of the 'real' player, so yeah kicking one is going to kill the entire connection and all players associated with it |
| 20:22.34 | blast007 | is that still the case? |
| 20:23.15 | CaptainRoberts[m | not unless you've massively refactored the solo bot code and added a kick bot message. |
| 21:13.06 | Zehra | Confirmed it only happens with the "solo" bots. |
| 21:14.08 | Zehra | Kind of was hoping it wasn't the case, but at least BZFS is smart enough not to kill all connections by IP. |
| 22:03.06 | CaptainRoberts[m | Itâs by socket |