| 00:19.12 | *** join/#brlcad infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 00:19.12 | *** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD and open source CAx discussion ! Also @ http://brlcad.zulipchat.com ! Logs @ http://infobot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ |
| 01:22.49 | *** join/#brlcad kintel_ (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 08:09.37 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@216-39-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 10:00.23 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@185.39.197.205) |
| 13:30.31 | *** join/#brlcad yorik (~yorik@2804:431:f721:327d:290:f5ff:fedc:3bb2) |
| 13:36.28 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 13:55.03 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 13:55.47 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 13:56.39 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 13:57.25 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 13:57.35 | *** join/#brlcad teepee (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) |
| 13:58.15 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 13:59.00 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 13:59.52 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 14:00.37 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 14:15.36 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@185.39.197.205) |
| 14:34.44 | *** join/#brlcad Caterpillar2 (~caterpill@unaffiliated/caterpillar) |
| 14:40.27 | *** join/#brlcad raingloom (~raingloom@C2267141.catv.pool.telekom.hu) |
| 15:35.39 | *** join/#brlcad amarjeet__ (~amarjeet@27.34.244.249) |
| 16:49.26 | *** join/#brlcad KimK (~KimK@2001:579:d00c:800:4a5b:39ff:fe0b:57d2) |
| 19:40.28 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:starseeker * 70886 brlcad/trunk/src/librt/bbox.c: The INFINITY assignments in shoot.c lines 993-1025 reach the rt_in_rpp calculations, and in cases where these values are multiplied by 0 a multiplication using an actual C99 inf results in a nan that causes all subsequent comparisons to return false. However, when falling back to our C89 compatibility definitions for INFINITY we get typical numerical |
| 19:40.32 | Notify | behavior (0*INFINITY == 0, not nan) which results in different behavior of the comparisons. For specific grazing cases, this results in different raytracing behavor as boxes reject and accept different rays. This needs a conceptual fix, but for the moment use additional checks to avoid doing comparisons in rt_in_rpp that will produce different results using the C89 numerical version of INFINITY (since all of those |
| 19:40.36 | Notify | tests would fail in the C99 case, we can achieve the same result if we just skip them when we have the INFINITY value).... |
| 21:04.57 | Stragus | Infinities should be avoided if you can use DBL_MAX instead, Inf have _very_ poor performance on many chips |
| 21:28.43 | *** join/#brlcad KimK (~KimK@2001:579:d00c:800:4a5b:39ff:fe0b:57d2) |
| 21:36.37 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@1-30-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 22:33.22 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 23:52.00 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |