| 01:49.58 | *** join/#brlcad nilram (~nilram@2001:250:3c02:763:f195:585f:65e0:1d65) |
| 02:46.46 | *** join/#brlcad poxip (~poxip@unaffiliated/mrpoxipol) |
| 04:20.53 | *** join/#brlcad poxip (~poxip@unaffiliated/mrpoxipol) |
| 04:25.17 | *** join/#brlcad davee_ (~davee@172.58.17.136) |
| 04:39.14 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 05:07.27 | *** join/#brlcad poxip (~poxip@unaffiliated/mrpoxipol) |
| 05:30.35 | *** join/#brlcad shubham (a5e1683b@gateway/web/freenode/ip.165.225.104.59) |
| 06:24.41 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (3d0c28b1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.61.12.40.177) |
| 06:54.48 | *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) |
| 07:02.02 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (b64b2d01@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.75.45.1) |
| 07:39.09 | *** join/#brlcad davee_ (~davee@71-83-188-23.dhcp.lnbh.ca.charter.com) |
| 07:44.10 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@AGrenoble-653-1-574-115.w90-42.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 08:02.29 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@AGrenoble-653-1-574-115.w90-42.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 08:10.44 | *** join/#brlcad d_rossberg (~rossberg@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
| 08:20.30 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@AGrenoble-653-1-574-115.w90-42.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 08:42.48 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) |
| 09:14.03 | *** join/#brlcad teepee` (bc5c2134@gateway/web/freenode/ip.188.92.33.52) |
| 09:15.40 | *** join/#brlcad witness_ (uid10044@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-iyihusywuimqblym) |
| 10:01.14 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) |
| 12:32.41 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) |
| 12:51.50 | *** join/#brlcad ceterumnet (~ceterumne@50.56.243.144) |
| 12:59.32 | *** join/#brlcad yorik (~yorik@191.255.88.202) |
| 13:07.46 | *** join/#brlcad qbz (~cLavelle@50.35.70.157) |
| 13:09.12 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) |
| 13:10.07 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) |
| 13:50.27 | *** join/#brlcad dracary1083 (dracarys98@nat/iiit/x-jxtcgdmshnbxdink) |
| 13:57.47 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 14:01.26 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:Krishnacodes * 9558 /wiki/Krishnacodes/GSOC16/logs: My Google Summer of 2016 Code Development Logs |
| 14:02.01 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) |
| 14:28.06 | *** join/#brlcad raghavjajodia_ (a7dcec56@gateway/web/freenode/ip.167.220.236.86) |
| 14:47.56 | *** join/#brlcad Ch3ck (~Ch3ck@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
| 15:25.04 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (3d0c28b1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.61.12.40.177) |
| 15:27.13 | *** join/#brlcad shubham_ (01163f2a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.1.22.63.42) |
| 15:36.18 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 15:42.01 | *** join/#brlcad adahp (~adahp@c-24-20-214-39.hsd1.or.comcast.net) |
| 15:50.56 | boj | Hi, could 'megd' visualize the thickness in BoT plate mode? (I know although the *thickness* is just an implicit representation of face property)? |
| 15:51.46 | boj | and I am drafting the proposal recently, and I want to know do I need to visualize the thickness if I want to add plate mode for NURBS? |
| 15:51.56 | boj | thanks. |
| 15:52.45 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 15:56.55 | *** join/#brlcad gaganjyot (~gaganjyot@122.173.79.18) |
| 16:03.05 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:MeShubham99 * 9559 /wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO: |
| 16:03.37 | d_rossberg | boj: did you already visualized a plate mode bot in mged? |
| 16:19.18 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 16:24.43 | d_rossberg | this is an example for a plate mode bot: |
| 16:24.46 | d_rossberg | put foo.bot bot mode plate orient no flags {} V {{1000 0 0} {0 1000 0} {0 0 1000}} F {{0 1 2}} T {100} fm 00000000 |
| 16:38.31 | *** join/#brlcad davee_ (~davee@71-83-188-23.dhcp.lnbh.ca.charter.com) |
| 16:42.42 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (3d0c28b1@gateway/web/freenode/ip.61.12.40.177) |
| 16:45.47 | *** join/#brlcad qbz (~cLavelle@50.35.70.157) |
| 16:54.49 | *** join/#brlcad nilram__ (~nilram@2001:250:3c02:763:f195:585f:65e0:1d65) |
| 16:58.35 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:MeShubham99 * 9560 /wiki/Online_Geometry/TODO: |
| 17:09.17 | *** join/#brlcad tandoorichick (b64b2d01@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.75.45.1) |
| 18:06.43 | *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) |
| 18:29.25 | tandoorichick | while defining the bot_edge struct (which currently has the dest vertex, use_count- no. of faces using the edge, and the next edge),was there ay specific reason the the faces using the edge weren't included as well? isn't good to have topological information on the go, rather than being computed each time it is required? the face information an be used to build face djacency lists which might come handy.. |
| 18:30.04 | tandoorichick | can be used* |
| 19:08.23 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:brlcad * 67352 brlcad/trunk/doc/STRATEGY: expand on the performant pipeline project |
| 19:31.49 | brlcad | boj: you can visualize the thickness with raytracing (run the rt command) |
| 19:32.15 | brlcad | getting ray tracing working for plate-mode nurbs is pretty much a given requirement |
| 19:33.28 | brlcad | tandoorichick: could be that the struct is only used during ray tracing, in which case it wouldn't have any use for topological informatino |
| 19:33.37 | brlcad | an editing interface would need that information though |
| 19:41.21 | tandoorichick | brlcad: since support for topological operations would be continued using the same structure, is it wise to add the face information now? |
| 20:13.41 | kkrcodes | Hello Everyone! I'm Krishna Reddy, a 3rd year Computer Science undergraduate student at Hindustan University, Chennai, India. I've been quietly listening to the IRC and following the mailing list throughout the past week while researching, deploying the old project and working on a project proposal for the Materials Database Website under GSOC 2016. I've detailed all the information in my proposal here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17ciIY11ati7ID2-hfM |
| 20:13.42 | kkrcodes | FZ30xGUWI3XK6-HauSpUthQZw Mentors and community members, I welcome your thoughts and reviews on the proposal. Anything you would like to clarify or propose to add to the feature list would be much appreciated. Please point out if any section needs to explained further. Thanks a lot! |
| 20:14.27 | kkrcodes | The link seems to have split into 2 lines. Here's the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17ciIY11ati7ID2-hfMFZ30xGUWI3XK6-HauSpUthQZw/edit#heading=h.2gazcsgmxkub |
| 20:22.07 | *** join/#brlcad Gabriel_ (d5e9550e@gateway/web/freenode/ip.213.233.85.14) |
| 20:32.24 | *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) |
| 20:36.36 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 20:49.20 | *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d847f94.dyn.telefonica.de) |
| 21:02.20 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@AGrenoble-653-1-574-115.w90-42.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 21:28.50 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 22:02.33 | *** join/#brlcad ickby (~stefan@x5d847f94.dyn.telefonica.de) |
| 22:07.12 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 22:12.23 | *** join/#brlcad kintel_ (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 22:16.51 | *** join/#brlcad dracarys983_ (dracarys98@nat/iiit/x-hiqdpzschxdiecul) |
| 22:27.17 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:vasco_costa * 67354 brlcad/trunk/include/rt/defines.h: Enable deprecated OpenCL 1.2 functions so code will compile on later versions of OpenCL. |
| 22:44.36 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@AGrenoble-653-1-574-115.w90-42.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 23:23.50 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD:vasco_costa * 67353 brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/rec/rec_shot.cl: Remove extraneous bracket character. |
| 23:44.07 | *** join/#brlcad kintel (~kintel@unaffiliated/kintel) |
| 23:45.40 | *** join/#brlcad teepee_ (~teepee@unaffiliated/teepee) |