| 00:17.54 | *** join/#brlcad ClientAlive (~shine@216.16.61.156) |
| 15:44.10 | *** join/#brlcad infobot (~infobot@rikers.org) |
| 15:44.10 | *** topic/#brlcad is BRL-CAD || http://brlcad.org || logs: http://ibot.rikers.org/%23brlcad/ || GSoC 2013! http://brlcad.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code |
| 15:47.48 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@14-58-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 16:08.55 | pawleeq_ | brlcad, ok, thank you. Right now I am testing it inside mged, I will se hou mvall and cpall will deal with it. |
| 16:13.07 | ``Erik | brlcad: I'd not really know what delete does, 'unlink' is how to rm a file, I'd think of delete as being a c++ memory op |
| 16:17.21 | ``Erik | we have rt_new_rti() and rt_free_rti()... should we carry that and have icv_new() and icv_free() ? |
| 16:18.23 | ``Erik | (I'm not really sure|I don't really know) |
| 19:28.18 | zero_level | ``Erik : icv_create(..) and icv_load(..) are two functions for creating an image structure (allocating memory space as per the size.) and |
| 19:28.49 | zero_level | for loading and image (from a file or stdin or a pipe.) respectively. |
| 19:29.44 | zero_level | so as per your suggestion I believe we should change the name of icv_Create to icv_new. |
| 19:29.50 | zero_level | right ? |
| 20:29.51 | Notify | 03BRL-CAD Wiki:Vladbogolin * 5968 /wiki/User:Vladbogolin/GSoC2013/Logs: /* Week 8 */ |
| 20:51.33 | zero_level | brlcad : I am not sure if I should convert utilities like pixinterp2x and pixhalve. when we have very power utilities like pixscale and bwscale. |
| 20:51.44 | zero_level | Pls suggest me if those are needed ? |
| 22:36.24 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@203-37-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 22:52.04 | *** join/#brlcad mpictor (~mark@2601:d:b280:b5:d63d:7eff:fe2d:2505) |
| 23:06.27 | *** join/#brlcad caen23 (~caen23@92.81.188.106) |