| 01:19.29 | brlcad | elf_: what command did you run that gave you that message? |
| 01:28.48 | brlcad | the file if_ogl.c shouldn't be a make target |
| 01:29.20 | brlcad | you'd make the product that compiles if_ogl.c, which would be "make libfb" |
| 01:29.32 | brlcad | or simply "make" which will rebuild all products that have changed including libfb |
| 02:58.11 | elf_ | I don't seem to be able to compile the file correctly, I added an 'S' option for double buffering, then I compiled and run the tool with pix-fb -F/dev/oglS but I get the 'S option not found, ignored' error, so I let only the 'S' option and tried again, it has the same effect, it sees all the previous options(which are not there, in the modeflags options anymore) but it doesn't see the 'S' one which I just added and it's currently the only one |
| 04:01.21 | *** join/#brlcad chamberlain (~chamberla@ip68-6-43-139.sb.sd.cox.net) |
| 04:04.08 | chamberlain | hello, I am a newly graduated computer engineer. I found myself in need of some open-source software like SolidWorks or Inventor, and this seems like the closest thing currently available. I'm tentatively thinking of contributing to brl-cad with the goal of one day adding some SolidWorks style features. Is that presumptuous or in line with brl-cad's vision? |
| 04:06.17 | kanzure | sure |
| 04:06.28 | kanzure | parametric nurbs-based modeling is definitely on target |
| 04:06.47 | kanzure | all the good parts of opennurbs cost many stacks of cash |
| 04:08.35 | chamberlain | yeah, I've noticed now that I'm not a student and can't get it for free... |
| 04:08.41 | chamberlain | hence wanting to make a free version :) |
| 04:12.00 | chamberlain | so..... just how much of an overhaul is needed for nurbs? |
| 04:12.16 | chamberlain | From some of the stuff I was reading, it sounded like nurbs was mostly implemented. |
| 04:15.01 | chamberlain | oh sorry, I just had to read up on what exactly opennurbs is. The models are nurbs, but the feature set is lacking, yes? |
| 04:19.15 | kanzure | boolean nurbs operations are presently lacking in brlcad |
| 04:19.23 | kanzure | opennurbs has those features if you pay |
| 04:20.10 | chamberlain | olry? interesting... |
| 04:20.19 | chamberlain | not so open then, is it? |
| 05:49.08 | *** join/#brlcad elf__ (~elf@92.80.52.5) |
| 06:01.34 | *** part/#brlcad chamberlain (~chamberla@ip68-6-43-139.sb.sd.cox.net) |
| 08:28.23 | *** join/#brlcad Al_Da_Best (~Al_Da_Bes@sam-seaborn-37.26.12.82.event.multiplay.co.uk) |
| 08:47.39 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@46.149.82.166) |
| 09:14.36 | *** part/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksuzee91@46.149.82.166) |
| 10:22.48 | *** join/#brlcad Mahi (~Mahi@ec2-50-16-47-142.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 13:16.16 | brlcad | elf__: it sounds like you may be missing some basic step like running the right tool or something |
| 13:16.44 | brlcad | make sure you're running the tool you compiled, not the one that may be in your path |
| 13:18.57 | *** join/#brlcad merzo (~merzo@224-234-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net) |
| 13:52.22 | ``Erik | cl -a |
| 15:01.34 | elf__ | brlcad here's what my CMAKE generated file looks like http://paste.ubuntu.com/1168166/ , I am modifying in the /home/elf/brlcad-7.22.0 |
| 15:35.12 | *** join/#brlcad elf (~elf@109.97.166.128) |
| 15:35.59 | Guest95680 | elf11 |
| 15:36.39 | *** join/#brlcad elf_ (~elf@109.97.166.128) |
| 16:15.44 | starseeker | elf_: if you're adding options, make sure you update the list of options bu_getopt is looking for |
| 16:24.35 | *** join/#brlcad elf__ (~elf@92.80.15.225) |
| 16:27.59 | *** join/#brlcad elf_ (~elf@92.80.45.194) |
| 16:30.00 | *** join/#brlcad elf__ (~elf@92.80.9.134) |
| 16:37.11 | *** join/#brlcad ksuzee (~ksu@193.151.105.83) |
| 16:50.06 | brlcad | elf__: that cmake generated file is useless to me (and you shouldn't need to muck with anything generated) |
| 16:50.30 | brlcad | it's a question of what you actually did, what commands you ran and in what order exactly |
| 16:50.48 | brlcad | because I think there's some disconnect somewhere that needs to be sorted out, understood |
| 17:32.23 | elf__ | Okay, so I installed the brlcad in the /home/brlcad folder. |
| 17:32.40 | elf__ | I have the source file in /home/brlcad-7.22.0 folder |
| 17:33.03 | elf__ | I modified the /home/brlcad/src/libfb/if_ogl.c file |
| 17:33.43 | elf__ | and I used the make libfb command in the /home/brlcad folder |
| 19:18.20 | *** join/#brlcad cristina (~quassel@86.127.164.155) |
| 19:18.28 | *** join/#brlcad cristina (~quassel@unaffiliated/cristina) |
| 19:32.23 | brlcad | elf__: so when you run pix-fb, which pix-fb are you running? |
| 19:35.17 | elf__ | the one /usr/brlcad/bin/pix-fb that's what the which command in ubuntu says |
| 20:00.58 | brlcad | maybe that's the issue then |
| 20:01.16 | brlcad | when you run "make libfb", that just recompiles the library |
| 20:01.19 | brlcad | that doesn't install it |
| 20:01.47 | brlcad | suggest deleting /usr/brlcad (for now) and just running the compiled binaries in your build direcotry |
| 20:04.46 | brlcad | they're in a 'bin' subdirectory in your build directory |
| 20:05.30 | brlcad | wherever you ran make, you should be able to run "bin/fbhelp" and get a usage statement |
| 23:43.05 | CIA-69 | BRL-CAD: 03r_weiss * r52254 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/nmg/nmg_tri.c: Reverted functions "is_convex", "nmg_flatten_face" and "cut_unimonotone" back to rev 50866. These were within file "nmg_tri.c". This restores nmg triangulation to better working code. |