| 00:38.13 | *** join/#brlcad Twingy (n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
| 00:42.17 | *** join/#brlcad andrecastelo_ (n=chatzill@189.71.19.205) |
| 02:19.43 | mafm | code submitted! |
| 02:19.46 | mafm | night |
| 03:52.22 | starseeker_ | pokes around for standards on technical drawing layouts... |
| 03:52.58 | Ralith | wonders what starseeker_ is working on |
| 03:53.51 | starseeker_ | nothing, as yet |
| 03:54.07 | starseeker_ | Ah, here we go... http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_tc_browse.htm?commid=46022 |
| 03:54.14 | Ralith | wonders what starseeker_ is thinking about |
| 03:54.53 | starseeker_ | If there's any standard for blueprint layouts |
| 03:55.18 | starseeker_ | likes pretty pictures |
| 03:55.24 | Ralith | agrees |
| 03:55.47 | starseeker_ | That's one boatload of documentation on the subject though :-( |
| 03:56.12 | Ralith | there's a lot of situations to cover |
| 03:57.00 | starseeker_ | nods |
| 03:57.23 | starseeker_ | In reality I need to keep working on find/search, so no pretty pictures for a while |
| 03:58.44 | Ralith | it would be pretty cool for brl-cad to be able to produce drawings |
| 03:59.05 | starseeker_ | many have thought so, no one has put forth the effort ;-) |
| 03:59.49 | Ralith | probably something to do with how there's a lot of situations to cover. |
| 04:00.06 | starseeker_ | partially that, partially a matter of other priorities |
| 04:00.26 | Ralith | well, yeah |
| 04:00.42 | Ralith | but the easier it is, the more likely some random person shows up to do it for SoC, or something |
| 04:00.51 | starseeker_ | and partially how the heck to get ahold of all the friggin docs... |
| 04:00.58 | starseeker_ | true |
| 04:01.58 | Ralith | yeah, having to actually buy the docs doesn't help, I imagine |
| 04:02.16 | starseeker_ | you imagine correctly |
| 04:14.40 | yukonbob | evening, cadheads |
| 04:33.38 | louipc | starseeker_: what kind of standards are you looking for? |
| 04:33.58 | starseeker_ | layout, required information, formatting, etc. |
| 04:34.48 | louipc | like third-angle projection vs first-angle projection, ... |
| 04:36.28 | louipc | I wouldn't say you need iso specs to start off though hehe |
| 04:37.52 | louipc | lots of info on the net and/or library about drafting 'standards' |
| 04:45.46 | Ralith | louipc: when it comes to writing a software implementation for a CAD suite, I think it's pretty important to strictly follow the formal standards. |
| 04:47.47 | louipc | well it should be flexible |
| 04:48.05 | Ralith | ? |
| 04:48.14 | Ralith | what does that mean |
| 04:48.24 | louipc | there's more than one standard |
| 04:50.13 | Ralith | I think the ISO standards are probably appropriate. |
| 04:52.27 | louipc | ANSI ;) |
| 04:53.32 | Ralith | I > A |
| 04:53.52 | louipc | are you european or something? :P |
| 04:54.34 | dtidrow | M$ proved that standards can be bought |
| 04:54.41 | louipc | haha |
| 04:54.56 | louipc | software is best when it's flexible anyways |
| 04:55.16 | dtidrow | see the ooxml debacle |
| 04:59.30 | Ralith | dtidrow: but nobody has a reason to buy these ones :P |
| 08:37.43 | b0ef | really sad iso has lost all integrity |
| 08:38.04 | b0ef | and credibility |
| 11:49.34 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@unaffiliated/elite01) |
| 12:27.18 | *** join/#brlcad mafm (n=mafm@elnet-111.lip.pt) |
| 12:31.35 | mafm | hello |
| 12:43.18 | *** join/#brlcad PrezKennnedy (i=Matthew@whitecalf.net) |
| 12:47.13 | *** join/#brlcad alex_joni (n=juve@emc/board-of-directors/alexjoni) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 12:50.19 | *** join/#brlcad elmom (n=elmom@hoasnet-ff04dd00-187.dhcp.inet.fi) |
| 12:50.19 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@unaffiliated/elite01) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 12:50.19 | *** join/#brlcad PrezKennedy (i=Matthew@whitecalf.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 14:38.23 | *** join/#brlcad prasad_ (n=psilva@h-72-245-122-226.mclnva23.covad.net) |
| 14:39.02 | *** join/#brlcad archivist_emc (n=archivis@host81-149-119-172.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 15:03.25 | starseeker | brlcad: OK, all of your test cases seem to work, although I'm a little fuzzy on the last one - I'll have to check what the "_" is supposed to do |
| 15:07.00 | starseeker | Also, something like search -name [0-9][a-z] without the "*" on the end fails unless I set glob_compat_mode to 0 - it seems like tcl is expanding that for some reason. Even then, with glob_compat_mode at 0 I have to escape the square brackets. Ugh. |
| 15:07.54 | starseeker | is more motivated than ever to keep TCL out of command pre-processing unless the command asks for it |
| 15:13.58 | starseeker | Hmm, looks like search . -name [[:upper:]][[:digit:]]* doesn't work... |
| 15:14.47 | starseeker | wonders if it should |
| 15:52.04 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p5B14C970.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 16:51.50 | starseeker | hrm. Does on Mac's find |
| 16:52.06 | starseeker | grumbles and wanders back into the fnmatch source code... |
| 16:58.03 | starseeker | wait, it does work |
| 16:58.07 | starseeker | blinks |
| 16:58.57 | starseeker | friggin tcl shell... |
| 17:10.19 | mafm | hi starseeker |
| 17:10.20 | mafm | :) |
| 17:10.26 | mafm | this channel is pretty quiet lately |
| 17:11.43 | starseeker | mafm: Howdy :-) |
| 17:11.48 | starseeker | yes, quiet indeed |
| 17:20.22 | mafm | I need more holidays, but not bad :) |
| 18:17.19 | starseeker | Yay, maxdepth and mindepth work :-) |
| 18:49.59 | starseeker | kicks CIA |
| 19:37.12 | starseeker | empty works |
| 19:39.04 | starseeker | brlcad: Do you want an "ls" option for BRL-CAD's search or is that better handled with the -exec option? |
| 19:56.51 | starseeker | and now iname works :-) |
| 20:52.58 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p5B14C970.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 22:16.15 | *** join/#brlcad Ralith (n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
| 22:46.35 | starseeker | And a path command |
| 22:46.38 | starseeker | er path option |
| 22:46.54 | starseeker | brlcad: regarding prune, can't that be handled by a combination of -not and -path? |
| 22:53.49 | *** join/#brlcad andrecastelo (n=chatzill@189.71.19.205) |
| 22:59.51 | brlcad | catches up |
| 23:00.30 | brlcad | starseeker: [] are special to tcl, they are like backticks |
| 23:01.38 | brlcad | drat, mafm left |
| 23:02.09 | brlcad | starseeker: ls is definitely better handled via exec |
| 23:02.25 | brlcad | and hm, -path seems out of place |
| 23:03.11 | brlcad | i mean i see the point, but especially for -not -path, that's not really different than -not -name |
| 23:04.19 | brlcad | I use that all the time to prune subtrees on a find search since it won't recurse into something that matches |