| 00:45.40 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 00:59.34 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 01:10.59 | louipc | poor CIA |
| 01:19.11 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 02:18.21 | *** join/#brlcad poolio (n=poolio@12.158.28.131) |
| 02:46.19 | *** mode/#brlcad [+o siggraph] by ChanServ |
| 02:50.23 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-5 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 03:06.34 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 03:23.02 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-5 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 03:30.01 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-5 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 03:50.08 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 04:23.00 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 04:34.20 | *** join/#brlcad CIA-4 (n=CIA@208.69.182.149) |
| 05:27.04 | ewilhelm | siggraph: did anything ever come out of the nist SCL step parser? |
| 05:53.09 | *** join/#brlcad cad86 (n=50c50fba@bz.bzflag.bz) |
| 09:57.56 | *** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslc-082-082-090-013.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
| 10:59.34 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p54874D94.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 13:09.32 | *** join/#brlcad Ammar_it (n=Ammar@90.153.210.107) |
| 13:16.21 | *** part/#brlcad Ammar_it (n=Ammar@90.153.210.107) |
| 13:27.09 | *** join/#brlcad docelic (n=docelic@212.91.113.186) |
| 15:50.34 | louipc | oh my |
| 15:53.39 | Maloeran | The hotel called me at 5am to tell me they received my luggage. I was a bit worried |
| 16:01.36 | louipc | wow where are you? |
| 16:16.14 | Maloeran | I'm at the Hilton San Diego Mission Valley, are you around San Diego? |
| 16:24.12 | louipc | I'm around toronto |
| 16:24.47 | louipc | but I'm going to LA in a couple of weeks (direct flight) yar har har |
| 16:44.42 | *** join/#brlcad b0ef (n=b0ef@062016141081.customer.alfanett.no) |
| 17:39.57 | *** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p54874D94.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 18:08.35 | *** join/#brlcad digitalfredy (n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
| 18:17.12 | *** part/#brlcad digitalfredy (n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
| 18:17.20 | *** join/#brlcad digitalfredy (n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
| 18:34.16 | *** join/#brlcad digitalfredy (n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
| 18:38.32 | *** join/#brlcad yukonbob (n=yukonbob@whthyt224-180.northwestel.net) |
| 18:52.05 | *** join/#brlcad digitalfredy_ (n=digitalf@200.71.62.161) |
| 19:05.01 | *** join/#brlcad Laniakea (i=clock@217-162-228-9.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
| 20:43.36 | *** join/#brlcad ertugerata (n=Ertugrul@88.224.38.9) |
| 20:43.46 | ertugerata | salut |
| 21:17.36 | *** join/#brlcad Laniakea (i=clock@217-162-228-9.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
| 22:16.06 | siggraph | ewilhelm: yes and no |
| 22:17.12 | siggraph | a step converter (and everything related, which includes nurbs/brep, tessellation, and the actual step converter) are our #1 priority for the past and next 12 months (at least) |
| 22:17.47 | siggraph | basically, it's still under development.. a ton of effort has been put into nurbs/brep to date (which is pretty much requisite for full/proper step support |
| 22:21.17 | MinuteElectron | siggraph: How is LDAP going? |
| 23:10.20 | *** join/#brlcad Twingy (n=justin@74.92.144.217) |
| 23:24.09 | ewilhelm | siggraph: thx. did narnia's work on the scl stuff get published? |
| 23:24.58 | ewilhelm | I'm looking at doing some work with IFC, so I think I'm going to be building some kind of express schema support code |
| 23:25.24 | ewilhelm | currently, the nist SCL code won't compile (and it looks like ./configure is a mess) |
| 23:34.18 | siggraph | louipc: good info! thanks .. if you've still got gdb handy, I've got some other things you could check that would help -- and I presume that the patch didn't fix the problem by itself? |
| 23:35.56 | siggraph | ewilhelm: narnia outright disappeared on me -- both he and I had fixed their build system (i.e. replaced it with a configure that actually works) but has not yet been integrated back into our repository because neither he or I got to a usable tool point |
| 23:36.17 | siggraph | could have been on a branch, but like I said .. he disappeared on me, and he was unfamiliar with cvs |
| 23:36.48 | siggraph | i could dig up what I have and commit it to a branch probably and get you access if you are interested in working on it |
| 23:37.36 | ewilhelm | sure, or e-mail me a tarball even |
| 23:39.04 | ewilhelm | looks like there was some other work at http://nwg.phy.bnl.gov/~bviren/uno/other/geant4.5.2-opt/source/geometry/solids/STEP/ |
| 23:39.35 | ewilhelm | though maybe that was a subset |
| 23:40.56 | siggraph | what's your work, if I may ask? |
| 23:41.14 | ewilhelm | http://scratchcomputing.com |
| 23:41.38 | ewilhelm | you might remember me from 2-3 years back |
| 23:41.50 | siggraph | oh, I remember exactly who you are :) |
| 23:42.01 | siggraph | i mean specifically what are you doing with step/express |
| 23:42.40 | ewilhelm | Industry Foundation Classes -- a Building Information Modeling exchange format |
| 23:45.13 | ewilhelm | for architecture/engineering/construction data |
| 23:45.13 | siggraph | so you're using step as your format? or express? or just importing/exporting step? |
| 23:46.18 | ewilhelm | IFC is derived from STEP/express |
| 23:47.14 | siggraph | derived as in a proper subset or an actual incompatible derivative? |
| 23:47.15 | ewilhelm | or, I suppose the correct way to say it is "defined as an express schema" |
| 23:47.21 | siggraph | ah, so same 'base language' but different schema |
| 23:48.00 | siggraph | akin to sgml and xml |
| 23:48.12 | ewilhelm | yeah, at least "as I currently understand it" |
| 23:48.48 | ewilhelm | still getting my head bootstrapped into it |
| 23:51.57 | ewilhelm | I guess 10303-11 is 'EXPRESS', which lets you define a schema (.exp file) which can then be referenced from a 10303-21 file with FILE_SCHEMA() |
| 23:52.22 | ewilhelm | e.g. ISO-10303-21; |
| 23:52.23 | ewilhelm | ... |
| 23:52.28 | ewilhelm | FILE_SCHEMA(('IFC2X2_FINAL')); |
| 23:56.19 | ewilhelm | IAI seems to be a little kinder about providing documents than ISO |
| 23:58.11 | siggraph | ~IAI |