00:37.29 | *** join/#asterisk Helenah1 (~s98259@unaffiliated/iveeee) |
00:38.09 | *** join/#asterisk Chotaire (chotaire@unaffiliated/chotaire) |
04:02.49 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl) |
04:21.35 | *** join/#asterisk mindthelion (~techquila@121-75-245-113.dyn.vf.net.nz) |
06:37.15 | *** join/#asterisk tomaluca95 (~quassel@kde/developer/tomaluca) |
07:40.18 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@87.213.247.82) |
07:43.26 | *** join/#asterisk igcewieling (~ewieling@ip208-94-98-135.nyigc.net) |
08:09.20 | *** join/#asterisk pabe (~pabe@81.24.66.208) |
08:45.04 | *** join/#asterisk Da-Geek (~Da-Geek@ip-188-118-19-1.reverse.destiny.be) |
09:36.59 | *** join/#asterisk DodgeThis (~DodgeThis@246.102.90.149.rev.vodafone.pt) |
09:44.04 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.107) |
10:29.04 | *** join/#asterisk mmx870 (~mmx@ptr1.cyberia.es) |
10:53.26 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon_ (~jkroon@165.16.203.107) |
11:19.45 | *** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPEb4fbe4e331bd-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
11:26.28 | *** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
11:49.40 | *** join/#asterisk jkroon_ (~jkroon@165.16.203.107) |
12:14.43 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl) |
12:15.08 | *** join/#asterisk dacod (~dacod@201.47.74.146) |
12:41.04 | *** join/#asterisk Haris (~haris@unaffiliated/haris) |
12:41.05 | Haris | hello all |
12:53.55 | *** join/#asterisk tomaluca95 (~quassel@kde/developer/tomaluca) |
13:04.12 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
13:04.12 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o gtjoseph] by ChanServ |
13:05.34 | *** join/#asterisk Helenah (~s98259@unaffiliated/iveeee) |
13:14.58 | *** join/#asterisk GoldenBear (~gb@172.83.42.24) |
13:42.54 | *** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50) |
14:02.49 | *** join/#asterisk overyander (~overyande@216.163.24.235) |
14:05.10 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl) |
14:13.19 | nullr0ute | hi |
14:29.45 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net) |
14:40.19 | *** join/#asterisk overyander (~overyande@216.163.24.235) |
15:08.20 | *** join/#asterisk Janos (~Janos@201.204.94.76) |
15:13.14 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@87.213.247.82) |
15:18.36 | *** join/#asterisk bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-yuzqxscmllualfzh) |
15:18.36 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o bford] by ChanServ |
15:21.07 | overyander | I'm trying to get asterisk configured to run under its own unprivileged user. I can su as the user and manually start using 'asterisk -cvv' and it works but when I start the service using 'systemctl asterisk start' I can see the process runs as root. |
15:22.00 | *** join/#asterisk saint_ (~saint_@unaffiliated/saint-/x-0540772) |
15:22.16 | davlefou | hi, in my dialpan i have that: sip:username@ip:port, is it possible to get username in asterisk? |
15:22.46 | sibiria | overyander: because the systemd unit file defines user and group as root |
15:22.58 | davlefou | i get from : ${SIPURI} |
15:23.05 | Samot | davlefou: The username should be the sip peer name |
15:23.23 | sibiria | first change to the user/group you want in asterisk.conf, then edit the unit file if necessary (and run systemctl daemon-reload afterwards) |
15:23.25 | Samot | davlefou: Get it how and from which direction? |
15:45.26 | davlefou | Samot, how can i have the peer name in dialplan? |
15:45.56 | Samot | You're asking how to get it |
15:45.58 | Samot | Right? |
15:46.03 | Samot | Get it from where? |
15:46.13 | Samot | An external call from the PSTN into Asterisk? |
15:46.19 | davlefou | Samot, the peersnemae of local user who launch the call. |
15:46.44 | Samot | So this is an user endpoint on Asterisk? |
15:48.37 | davlefou | The user call an local irv. I would like to have his username. |
15:48.52 | davlefou | (peersname) |
15:50.19 | file | https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+17+Function_CHANNEL |
15:53.16 | *** join/#asterisk bmg505 (~leon@169-0-148-230.ip.afrihost.co.za) |
16:21.14 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216.191.106.165) |
16:24.28 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat62@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
16:27.03 | Haris | thank you. will test it |
16:27.05 | *** part/#asterisk Haris (~haris@unaffiliated/haris) |
16:37.19 | overyander | can anyone speak to the main differences between the polycom vvx 411 and vvx 350? did they just change the housing or are there major underlying differences within the firmware? |
16:40.28 | [TK]D-Fender | https://www.polycom.com/content/dam/polycom/common/documents/guides/desktop-phone-matrix-quick-reference-guide-enus.pdf |
16:54.42 | Samot | The two big differences would be 6 vs 12 lines and side car support. Only the 4XX or highers support side cars. |
16:56.55 | Samot | So it's more like cubicle worker vs receptionist use cases. |
16:57.38 | lagzilla | Does anyone know if mitel stopped making unified software packages for the 6800 series |
16:58.12 | igcewieling | The nice thing about the VVX410 is that it doesn't have a touch screen. |
16:58.34 | igcewieling | I don't know about the VVX411, but I assume it is mostly the same as the 410. |
17:00.23 | Samot | The 401/411s were hardware refreshes of the 400/410 |
17:00.56 | Samot | The entire x01/x11's where. |
17:01.21 | overyander | right, but i'm looking at the differences between the x11's and x50's |
17:01.29 | Samot | I just told you. |
17:01.40 | Samot | 11:54:43 AM <Samot> The two big differences would be 6 vs 12 lines and side car support. Only the 4XX or highers support side cars. |
17:01.49 | *** join/#asterisk salviadud (~ralfalfa@187-162-213-198.static.axtel.net) |
17:01.50 | Samot | 350 has 6 lines, 411 has 12 |
17:01.57 | Samot | 350 can't have side cars, 411 can have 3 |
17:02.10 | Samot | cubicle worker vs receptionist. |
17:02.33 | Samot | They both have the same size color screen. |
17:02.38 | Samot | 12 soft keys |
17:02.54 | Samot | 350 has 2 USB ports vs 1 USB in the 411 |
17:04.13 | Samot | 11:40:29 AM <[TK]D-Fender> https://www.polycom.com/content/dam/polycom/common/documents/guides/desktop-phone-matrix-quick-reference-guide-enus.pdf |
17:04.17 | Samot | Plus there was that. |
17:04.24 | Samot | Which has all the models. |
17:33.13 | *** join/#asterisk i9zO5AP (~BQcdf9eiZ@41.248.120.170) |
17:48.33 | igcewieling | Does anyone here have experience running VoIP via a GRE tunnel? Since the packets are small, they should never fragment |
17:53.36 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@178.34.150.142) |
17:54.07 | *** join/#asterisk miralin1 (~Thunderbi@host-46-45-217-207.stavropol.ru) |
18:00.27 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@178.34.150.142) |
18:08.17 | *** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-sslblvgjzigxgnrx) |
18:08.17 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ |
18:10.52 | Samot | I've done some testing on it. |
18:11.03 | Samot | Hadn't had any real problems. |
18:12.04 | Samot | I haven't deployed it yet, still need to do some more testing. Like long calls, hold, transfers, etc. But basic call testing was OK. |
18:27.11 | *** join/#asterisk mindthelion (~techquila@2407:7000:9125:e400:f1c2:df9f:be37:22a2) |
18:29.54 | *** join/#asterisk techquila (~techquila@2407:7000:9125:e400:a453:6053:e9c0:bace) |
18:46.52 | *** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPEb4fbe4e331bd-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
19:18.06 | *** join/#asterisk AndChat|620489 (~AndChat62@2600:100e:b02e:4584:c5b4:fc41:4ee8:c7aa) |
19:19.57 | *** join/#asterisk AndChat|620489 (~AndChat62@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
19:22.55 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat62@2600:100e:b02e:4584:c5b4:fc41:4ee8:c7aa) |
19:33.12 | igcewieling | Samot: thanks. I needed a couple of GRE tunnels for voice and have not heard any complaints, but 2 tunnels is hardly an indication of a trend. |
19:39.00 | *** join/#asterisk miralin1 (~Thunderbi@host-46-45-217-207.stavropol.ru) |
19:53.10 | *** join/#asterisk mindthelion (~techquila@2407:7000:9125:e400:a453:6053:e9c0:bace) |
19:54.31 | *** join/#asterisk ketas- (~ketas@0011-0000-0000-0000-d7dc-830e-07d0-2001.dyn.estpak.ee) |
19:54.57 | *** join/#asterisk RudyValencia_ (rudy@unaffiliated/rudyvalencia) |
19:55.08 | *** join/#asterisk x5eb (~seb@seb-hpws2.elen.ucl.ac.be) |
19:57.23 | *** join/#asterisk seanbright_ (~sean@asterisk/community-developer/seanbright) |
19:57.23 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o seanbright_] by ChanServ |
20:04.38 | *** join/#asterisk Helenah (~s98259@unaffiliated/iveeee) |
20:05.46 | *** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
20:05.46 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o gtjoseph] by ChanServ |
20:50.38 | drmessano | VoIP in a GRE tunnel works great |
20:57.56 | *** join/#asterisk miralin1 (~Thunderbi@178.34.150.142) |
21:01.58 | *** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@178.34.150.142) |
21:16.35 | igcewieling | drmessano: Almost all off-net VoIP customers get an Adtran on-site so tunneling is an option and removing NAT would make the devices easier for support to access. |
21:16.52 | igcewieling | It seems like everyone should be doing it. |
21:18.38 | file | I'd expect any GRE woes to be a result of the equipment in question, and not inherently of the GRE tunnel itself since it's just a light encapsulation |
21:24.49 | *** join/#asterisk mindthelion (~techquila@2407:7000:9125:e400:f1c2:df9f:be37:22a2) |
21:27.58 | Samot | 4:16:53 PM <igcewieling> It seems like everyone should be doing it. <-- In order to do that there would need to be proper equipment. In some (quite a lot) that just isn't going to be an option taken. |
21:29.15 | drmessano | Yeah not every owns a Mikrotik |
21:30.16 | Samot | It's a setup that can disrupt a network. |
21:32.04 | Samot | I generally just use the GRE tunnels for management and don't worry about putting the voice over it. |
21:34.13 | igcewieling | I mainly use it because it can transport OSPF (which uses Multicast), unlike an IP-IP tunnel or IPSec tunnel. |
21:34.59 | Samot | It would also mess with my failover. |
21:35.41 | igcewieling | I use the tunnels for failover |
21:37.09 | igcewieling | well I use OSPF for failover, but sometimes need GRE to accomplish that. |
21:37.54 | igcewieling | misses the good old days when if the circuit goes down, the interface goes down. |
21:37.59 | Samot | Different kind of failover. |
21:38.03 | Samot | I don't provider the Internet. |
21:38.09 | igcewieling | I suppose most people don't remember those days |
21:38.09 | Samot | I don't provide the Internet. |
21:38.39 | igcewieling | Samot: *nod* |
21:38.40 | Samot | However all my devices use SRV records and then the proxies check the voice systems. |
21:38.40 | *** join/#asterisk infinity_ (~brendon@magnolia.netcal.com) |
21:38.56 | igcewieling | both ways have pros and cons |
21:40.05 | Samot | Well since I'm not providing the internet. If their Internet goes down, the GRE tunnel is worthless. |
21:40.29 | Samot | So yes, my failover is for my network to ensure it can handle calls and endpoints. |
21:40.57 | igcewieling | One assumes more than one internet connection if you are doing failover on the customer side. |
21:42.13 | Samot | I didn't say I was doing failover at the customer site, I was doing failover for my network. |
21:42.52 | Samot | I have end users where I do dual Internet connections and have the traffic to the backup Internet connection. |
21:43.10 | Samot | But if my primary proxy goes down, they can reach the secondary proxy via the SRV records. |
21:43.31 | igcewieling | I use SRV records for failover on out network side |
21:43.56 | Samot | Right. If I was the ISP, they would be over a private WAN. |
21:49.55 | drmessano | SRV = Military-Grade CNAME |
21:50.25 | drmessano | amirite? |
21:50.30 | Samot | It's a leather neck |
21:55.01 | Samot | For 95% of end users on my network I control everything but the Internet. |
21:55.24 | Samot | The other 5% is either on their own router or I control the voice side and someone else deals with the data side. |
21:56.12 | Samot | And if I control the voice side that means I control all the core switches since everything would be VLAN'd off from each other. |
21:56.51 | Samot | Since most of these "office network admins" can't tell a VLAN from a VPN is they had a gun to their head. |
22:01.03 | Samot | Although they are still less complicated than drmessano's home network. |
22:01.08 | Samot | Mr. I VLAN everything. |
22:01.33 | drmessano | I'm actually using VLANv6 now |
22:01.44 | drmessano | Every endpoint has its own VLAN |
22:01.49 | igcewieling | with 256 bit MACs! |
22:01.54 | Samot | I bet you have a VLAN just for your kitchen appliances. |
22:02.04 | *** join/#asterisk Janos (~Janos@201.204.94.76) |
22:02.05 | Samot | Because I know they're on a netowkr. |
22:02.10 | Samot | Because I know they're on a network. |
22:02.22 | drmessano | Well, my microwave is |
22:02.31 | Samot | We spent weeks on christmas lights the other year. |
22:02.39 | drmessano | Yeah we did |
22:02.47 | igcewieling | ./sh make_coffee_pot_explode.sh sip:drmessano |
22:02.49 | igcewieling | oops. |
22:02.55 | Samot | Like weeks. |
22:03.01 | Samot | So they would have time conditions. |
22:03.28 | drmessano | Can't remember what the hangup was.. some boolean something was a double negative |
22:03.43 | Samot | It was the weird days of the week |
22:03.49 | drmessano | Yeah |
22:03.58 | Samot | Weekend rules but then on certain days rules. |
22:04.04 | Samot | And they were colliding. |
22:04.23 | igcewieling | If you put it off long enough the problem of christmas lights solves itself. |
22:04.35 | drmessano | Yeah that was the problem |
22:04.44 | drmessano | It solved itself several years in a row |
22:04.49 | drmessano | So I wanted to nail it down, finally |
22:04.58 | Samot | igcewieling: He basically wanted a full month calendar so he need had to touch the lights |
22:04.59 | drmessano | It's solid now |
22:05.13 | Samot | er never had to |
22:05.35 | Samot | They be on/off based on his home schedule. |
22:05.36 | drmessano | Yeah, middle of November to Jan 6 |
22:05.58 | drmessano | Tree stays lit 24/7 on weekends |
22:06.05 | drmessano | and on Dec 24/25 |
22:06.25 | drmessano | Maybe the outside lights stay lit on Dec24/25 as well |
22:06.34 | drmessano | Otherwise follow the day/night sked |
22:06.59 | drmessano | Shit works though |
22:08.19 | Samot | Yeah. It was literally one freaking line of code. |
22:08.25 | Samot | That was the entire problem. |
22:08.42 | drmessano | Yeah, that's the app |
22:10.33 | *** join/#asterisk rwb (~Thunderbi@65.183.138.202) |
22:15.05 | *** join/#asterisk Helenah (~s98259@unaffiliated/iveeee) |
23:38.51 | *** join/#asterisk AndChat|620489 (~AndChat62@113.sub-97-43-192.myvzw.com) |
23:42.50 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat62@2600:100e:b045:752c:9c3:6083:9695:731) |