IRC log for #asterisk on 20181023

00:06.36*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
00:09.10*** join/#asterisk u0m3_ (~u0m3@82.76.83.7)
01:09.20*** join/#asterisk infobot (ibot@208.53.50.136)
01:09.20*** topic/#asterisk is #asterisk The Open Source PBX and Telephony Platform (asterisk.org) -=- LTS: 13.23.1 (2018/09/20) 16.0.0 (2018/10/09), Security Only: 15.6.1 (2018/09/20); DAHDI: DAHDI-linux 2.11.1 (2016/03/01), DAHDI-tools 2.11.1 (2016/03/01); libpri 1.6.0 (2017/01/27) -=- Wiki: wiki.asterisk.org -=- Code of Conduct: bit.ly/1hH6P22 -=- Logs: bit.ly/1s4AKKu
01:34.08*** join/#asterisk dandann00dle (~dandann00@c-76-114-64-149.hsd1.tn.comcast.net)
01:44.28*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
01:46.27*** join/#asterisk shanth (~shanth@traphouse.realsippers.com)
01:57.30*** join/#asterisk CatCow97 (~mine9@c-24-22-38-85.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
02:18.37*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
03:22.55*** join/#asterisk simbalion (~simba@tailpuff.net)
03:23.47simbalionHi, what controls the length of time a queue extension is tried? Is it 'timeout'? Mine is set to 10 presently and it only rings a line twice before trying others, I want to increase that
03:26.56*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
03:28.08simbalionnvm found out that is right, through testing :)
03:28.36*** join/#asterisk dandann00dle (~dandann00@2601:840:8401:d7ee:cd87:f9f3:b237:db82)
03:33.24*** join/#asterisk MrTAP (~MrT@unaffiliated/mrtap)
03:34.43*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl)
04:28.39*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
04:44.38*** join/#asterisk TriJetScud (~TriJetScu@69.172.162.252)
05:32.15*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
05:41.51*** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@84-115-150-8.cable.dynamic.surfer.at)
05:47.49*** join/#asterisk _mwoodj_ (~mwoodj@pdpc/sponsor/digium/hyper-eye)
06:06.23*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
06:09.24*** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2a02:b18:581:10:100b:a8e2:49fa:4538)
06:27.39*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (~James_Axl@176.98.158.9)
06:39.00*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
06:39.51*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@87.213.247.82)
06:50.37*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
07:12.06*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@87.213.247.82)
07:39.17*** join/#asterisk DanB (~DanB@clt-195.192.207.219.ip-anschluss.net)
07:50.28*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.126)
07:55.46*** join/#asterisk justdave_ (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave)
08:16.11*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@60.30.148.146.bc.googleusercontent.com)
08:33.25*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (~James_Axl@176.98.158.9)
09:04.12*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net)
09:07.42*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (luckman212@unaffiliated/luckman212)
09:08.36*** join/#asterisk war9407 (~war@2600:4040:400f:c300:10a:12ee:bd81:2acb)
09:22.41*** join/#asterisk Da-Geek (~Da-Geek@135.196.42.4)
09:41.36*** join/#asterisk friedrich (~friedrich@aextron.de)
09:48.23*** join/#asterisk friedrich (~friedrich@aextron.de)
09:51.35*** join/#asterisk manticorpus (~manticore@130.125.14.46.static.wline.lns.sme.cust.swisscom.ch)
10:00.32*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@87.116.190.98)
10:15.08*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@87.116.190.98)
11:00.52*** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPE64777d632383-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
11:16.22*** join/#asterisk davlefou (~davlefou@unaffiliated/davlefou)
11:25.48*** part/#asterisk manticorpus (~manticore@130.125.14.46.static.wline.lns.sme.cust.swisscom.ch)
11:34.38*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@194.8.128.68)
11:35.00*** join/#asterisk m4rcu5 (nobody@546AF885.cm-12-3d.dynamic.ziggo.nl)
11:44.24*** join/#asterisk nighty- (~nighty@s229123.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp)
11:48.04*** join/#asterisk Iamnacho (~Iamnacho@ip68-102-146-44.ks.ok.cox.net)
11:56.59*** join/#asterisk cemotyz09 (~cemotyz09@70.121.128.59)
12:39.20jamesaxlHello
12:39.31jamesaxlSamot: hi, I hope you are good.
12:42.49*** join/#asterisk J0hnSteel (~J0hnSteel@62.162.164.77)
12:46.13*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@87.116.190.98)
12:46.26*** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50)
12:48.58*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl)
12:52.28*** join/#asterisk cryptic (~cryptic@142.196.170.87)
13:04.42*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216.191.106.165)
13:15.14pchero_workHi guys, I would like to know the sequence number of ari events of the channel. Is there any good idea..?
13:15.42*** join/#asterisk sahmed (~sahmed@cpe-70-114-236-63.austin.res.rr.com)
13:19.28*** join/#asterisk dandann00dle (~dandann00@2601:840:8401:d7ee:cd87:f9f3:b237:db82)
13:19.57fileI don't think anyone has really documented the sequence
13:23.09pchero_workah, not that one.
13:23.41pchero_workIf the ari send a event via websocket, I would like to know the sequence of the event of the channel.
13:24.29pchero_workIf the channel sent a 5 events, every each event has a sequence 1 to 5.
13:24.44filethey don't have sequence numbers
13:24.51filebut they are guaranteed to be in order over the websocket
13:25.37pchero_workfile: thanks. You're right. I need to look at it more in different way..
14:07.21*** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-jdtcrhnwemlhflvn)
14:07.21*** mode/#asterisk [+o kharwell] by ChanServ
14:13.42*** join/#asterisk qxork (~qxork@unaffiliated/qxork)
14:16.55*** join/#asterisk TriJetScud (~TriJetScu@69.172.162.252)
14:27.39*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (uid299068@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
14:27.39*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
14:31.58*** join/#asterisk duo_kali (b61ece20@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.30.206.32)
14:32.38*** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-llzryrqpollyefne)
14:32.38*** mode/#asterisk [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ
14:37.42*** join/#asterisk bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-nekblmdzboqhgcgo)
14:37.42*** mode/#asterisk [+o bford] by ChanServ
15:41.40*** join/#asterisk mhache (~mhache_@198.164.250.208)
16:02.10Kobazi don't know what's going on... i can't log into this one polycom anymore
16:02.36Kobazthe web portal says invalid password... but i have a forced password set in <device> in the polycom cfg
16:16.10shanthmight be why the sales guys email is slow
16:16.19shanthhe's gonna talk to the CEO about it
16:23.36*** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-buxpvndhxxulcxlp)
16:23.36*** mode/#asterisk [+o kharwell] by ChanServ
16:36.37*** join/#asterisk salviadud (~ralfalfa@187-167-69-132.static.axtel.net)
16:53.26*** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave)
16:55.45*** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2a02:b18:581:10:100b:a8e2:49fa:4538)
17:01.27*** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2a02:b18:581:10:100b:a8e2:49fa:4538)
17:05.09*** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2a02:b18:581:10:100b:a8e2:49fa:4538)
17:15.20*** join/#asterisk d1gital (~d1gital@fsf/member/d1gital)
17:16.41*** join/#asterisk MrTAP (~MrT@unaffiliated/mrtap)
17:17.17d1gital\o hello
17:17.42d1gitalI have libopus installed, but it doesn't seem to be loaded when I try to load the opus codec:  [2018-10-23 16:58:34] WARNING[22106]: loader.c:573 load_dynamic_module: Error loading module 'codec_opus_open_source.so': /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/codec_opus_open_source.so: undefined symbol: opus_encode
17:17.57d1gitalany idea what I've missed?
17:18.05FrankyCyborgthat's a linker problem
17:18.48FrankyCyborgyour module is missing the named symbol - most likely, because your .so file is not linking against the opus library
17:19.21FrankyCyborgare you on linux or mac os x?
17:19.34d1gitalubuntu, installed from apt
17:19.46d1gitalyou're right; libopus isn't in the ldd output for that module
17:19.48FrankyCyborghave you installed the opus library on your system?
17:19.57FrankyCyborgyep, that's it
17:21.11d1gitalstrange.  I installed asterisk-opus from the ubuntu repos.  I wonder why it wouldn't be linked against libopus
17:21.37FrankyCyborgmaybe because that wouldn't install the opus library itself?
17:22.16FrankyCyborgdo you have header/library files of opus in /usr/include or /usr/lib  (or whatever paths you are using)?
17:22.35d1gitalI do have libopus installed, and I can see the opus_encode symbol defined in "nm -D /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libopus.so.0.5.2"
17:24.00FrankyCyborghmm, if it's not a platform mismatch (32/64-bit), it may be possible to link the .so file afterwards against that opus library?  (I would make a backup of it first)  I know how to do that on mac os x, but not on linux
17:26.40FrankyCyborgbut it's strange, that this issue happens, when you used the repos
17:33.55*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.168)
17:57.06*** join/#asterisk duo_kali (b61e0c3c@gateway/web/freenode/ip.182.30.12.60)
18:15.14igcewielingIt appears the sip to pjsip config conversion script puts all the permits in a single ACL.
18:24.21*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@194.8.128.68)
18:46.09*** join/#asterisk pa (~pa@unaffiliated/pa)
18:49.28shanthwhen i register/connect with my sip provider to trunk, is that unencrypted when it sends the password?
18:55.33[TK]D-FenderNo, it is MD5'd for auth, but the audio is unencrypted most of the time.
18:55.57[TK]D-FenderThen again an attacker would have to have a way to get themselves in the packet path
18:59.59*** join/#asterisk trmg (~trmg@24.176.227.66)
19:03.36*** join/#asterisk kfife (~Miranda@home.chicagoventure.com)
19:04.45trmgI'm having an odd issue that I'm hoping I can get some pointers on.
19:06.16*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (~James_Axl@176.98.158.9)
19:09.40kfifeCan I limit the number of concurrent calls for a specific peer in sip.conf, or must that be done in the dialplan?
19:12.36[TK]D-Fendereither
19:34.47qxorkMr Fife!
19:35.38*** join/#asterisk Milos (~Milos@pdpc/supporter/student/milos)
19:35.40qxorkkfife: there’s a call-limit= availabile in sip.conf
19:35.57qxorkyou can also use group in dialplan which is my prefered method
19:36.25*** join/#asterisk Oatmeal (Suzeanne@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/suzeanne)
19:40.40shanththinking of using Flowroute but the number of 404 pages they have is making me nervous
19:47.34*** join/#asterisk d1gital (~d1gital@fsf/member/d1gital)
19:52.51trmgshanth: FWIW I used Flowroute for a while and have no complaints with their service.
20:08.37*** join/#asterisk DanFromUK (sid21651@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-nmqvyhdvvlkccsgo)
20:09.49DanFromUKHi. I'm trying to configure a new Polycom phone. It's something I've done hundreds of times. I'm using the same provisioning files, just changing the sip login details. But Asterisk seems to be simply ignoring the REGISTER packets.
20:09.55DanFromUKIt's not replying at all.
20:10.20DanFromUKI have captured the packets on the firewall, and also on the server itself, but pjsip logger shows nothing from that ip address.
20:10.48DanFromUKI've got another phone, on the same external network, and it's working fine. Any ideas what could cause asterisk to simply ignore packets?
20:11.42[TK]D-FenderBecause maybe it's not passing the firewall to get to *
20:11.56[TK]D-Fendergo prove there are no rules that could block it, then prove that * is listening on the right port, etc
20:12.03DanFromUKtcpdump on the asterisk box says it is passing the firewall
20:12.34DanFromUKand i've got another phone sat next to me which is able to communicate with no problems at all
20:13.50[TK]D-FenderLess anecdotes, more backup....
20:16.32DanFromUKMight be some form of SIP ALG issue actually. Running tcpdump on the Asterisk machine, it appears that the "broken" phone and one of the working phones are using the same source port. I wonder if asterisk is ignoring it because the credentials don't match another phone using that source port.
20:19.01*** join/#asterisk CatCow97 (~mine9@c-24-22-38-85.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
20:20.36*** join/#asterisk cemotyz09 (~cemotyz09@cpe-70-121-128-59.satx.res.rr.com)
20:22.12igcewielingDanFromUK: if the source port shown in sip show peers (or whatever is right for pjsip) is 5060 for more than one device behind the same router, that strongly indicates ALG
20:23.17DanFromUKyes. this is at home. just trying to catch up work and set up a device for a client. it's just odd that i've got 6 other devices working fine here. going to check out the router.
20:24.16DanFromUKnope. sip alg turned off. time for a reboot i think.
20:37.34*** join/#asterisk sh_smith (~sh_smith@cpe-76-174-26-91.socal.res.rr.com)
20:37.42[TK]D-FenderOr... we could try NOT fucking with the evidence...
20:37.52[TK]D-FenderAnd actually look
20:58.47trmgAny pointers on what to troubleshoot when PJSIP falls apart and you're seeing a ton of various "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again." in the log?
21:26.02*** join/#asterisk efm (~efm@vpn.tummy.com)
22:03.31*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2)
22:07.42*** join/#asterisk tomaluca95 (~quassel@kde/developer/tomaluca)
22:34.29Sladewas at a little think tank for small businesses today. one of the ideas made me wonder the feasibility of little guys/providers doing their cellphone time in the same manner that they can do their voip time
22:35.17efmSlade: like a MVNO?
22:35.36Sladeyes
22:47.37DanFromUKI realise now that the other phones at home are connected to another asterisk server at the datacentre. Either way, the packets from this phone are not being accepted by Asterisk, even though the packets are being received by the server os.
22:49.21DanFromUK<PROTECTED>
22:49.24efmSlade: did you wonder in a positive way?
22:49.50DanFromUK[TK]D-Fender: Not really sure why you are responding like that. tcpdump clearly shows the packets are being received by the server os, although you are implying that it's either not or i'm lying? sending you a tcpdump from the os will only allow you to validate what i'm saying. or you can simply trust me when I say that asterisk is not responding to a specific ip address or not receiving the packets.
22:50.12[TK]D-Fenderor that we're seeing prefiltered results
22:50.25[TK]D-FenderSo far we are not seeing a firewall having been emptied out or anything at all
22:50.32Sladeefm, hum.. a cynical but hopeful way?
22:50.33DanFromUKtcpdump is post filter?
22:52.01[TK]D-Fenderhttps://superuser.com/questions/925286/does-tcpdump-bypass-iptables
22:52.20filetcpdump is before iptables
22:52.32[TK]D-Fender^
22:52.38DanFromUKnoted.
22:52.48[TK]D-FenderYou see things * may never get to
22:53.08DanFromUKok. i understand.
22:57.40efmSlade:  you could call it 'decentralized'
23:09.12Sladeefm, i have to think the carriers would overcharge.. but it would be awesome if it was possible
23:18.00efmSlade: I use project fi, and think it's awesome. But that's the sort of thing you are describing
23:18.11*** part/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-buxpvndhxxulcxlp)
23:18.28Sladei know very little about project fi
23:19.12efmphone + voip + cellular + internet  for a modest price and pay as you go bw
23:32.28*** join/#asterisk gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj)
23:32.28*** mode/#asterisk [+o gtjoseph] by ChanServ

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.