IRC log for #asterisk on 20180605

00:05.18Labyrinth00Ok I will give that a try thanks
00:10.50*** join/#asterisk aness (~aness@cm-84.209.48.16.getinternet.no)
00:14.18*** join/#asterisk justdave (~dave@unaffiliated/justdave)
00:20.47*** join/#asterisk infobot (ibot@rikers.org)
00:20.47*** topic/#asterisk is #asterisk The Open Source PBX and Telephony Platform (asterisk.org) -=- LTS: 13.21.0 (2018/05/01), Standard: 15.4.0 (2018/05/01); DAHDI: DAHDI-linux 2.11.1 (2016/03/01), DAHDI-tools 2.11.1 (2016/03/01); libpri 1.6.0 (2017/01/27) -=- Wiki: wiki.asterisk.org -=- Code of Conduct: bit.ly/1hH6P22 -=- Logs: bit.ly/1s4AKKu
00:32.26*** join/#asterisk aness (~aness@cm-84.209.48.16.getinternet.no)
00:34.31*** join/#asterisk cemotyz09 (~cemotyz09@cpe-70-121-157-202.satx.res.rr.com)
00:44.28*** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com)
01:02.08*** join/#asterisk dar123 (~dar@2600:1700:38d0:1470:ac9e:150:2bc4:491c)
01:19.17*** join/#asterisk mknooihuisen (~mknooihui@2600:1700:f960:7270:e069:7375:2f2e:3e3e)
01:30.07mknooihuisenHi all, I wonder if someone would be able to help me out?  I've got a DID from Flowroute and set it up with Asterisk 13 according to their help articles.  When I dial into the DID externally asterisk claims that There is no extension MY_DID in context default.  I know the default context is bad to use, but fail to see how to set the context for flowroute inbound.  My sip.conf is: https://pastebin.com/zvbpj
01:30.07mknooihuisen0Pb (with some obvious security blurring)
01:30.28mknooihuisenAnd that link not cut off is: https://pastebin.com/zvbpj0Pb
01:35.58Samotcontext=from-trunk <-- Does the number exist in that context?
01:36.39SamotAlso, in their instructions "MY_DID" is a placeholder. As in, the DID you want to route.
01:44.20*** join/#asterisk Oatmeal (Suzeanne@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/suzeanne)
01:51.44mknooihuisenSamot: "from-trunk" is not currently a context, but I tried that.  And and I know about MY_DID.  I'm just using it as a placeholder here too. :)
01:51.56SamotOK
01:51.59SamotSo that's your problem.
01:52.12SamotYou're sending inbound calls to a context that doesn't exist.
01:55.05Samotsipdebug=yes <-- There is absolutely no need for this to be yes. You can turn sip debug on when needed.
01:55.12SamotDoesn't need to be on all the time, that's just nuts.
01:55.48Samotpreferred_codec_only=yes <- Not needed if you're using just one codec. It *is* the preferred.
01:56.18Samotcanreinvite=no <-- This should be: directmedia=no
01:57.33mknooihuisenInteresting, alright.  I based my confs off of Flowroutes suggestions, but for clarification, I tried the [from-trunk] context and it did not work.  My Extensions.conf is: https://pastebin.com/T6M6aBzW
01:58.06mknooihuisenI'll leave sipdebug until I get it working, then turn it off.
01:58.15SamotAgain
01:58.23SamotYou can just turn it on in the clie if you need to look at it.
01:58.52SamotOK so show an incoming call to that DID
01:59.02Samotasterisk -rvvvvvvvvvvv
01:59.16Samotor core set verbose 10 if you're already in the cli.
02:00.31mknooihuisenI'll assume you want sipdebug off to reduce output.
02:03.25mknooihuisenSamot: https://pastebin.com/7QbG08vi
02:04.15SamotWhere do you have the default context defined?
02:05.44mknooihuisenTo my knowledge, I don't.  Although when I do define it, it works.
02:06.49mknooihuisenIf I changed from-trunk to default in extensions.conf it would work, but I recall an astricon talk that indicated default context was bad, and also... I just want to know why it's doing that.
02:09.46*** join/#asterisk Mr_Pleb_Mgoo (~jakeb@103.46.213.148)
02:10.50Samot[flowroute4][flowroute-trunk] <-- Oh this is wrong
02:11.12SamotWell wait...
02:11.33SamotJesus, this is the one thing I hate about Flowroute. Their Asterisk stuff is always so out of date.
02:11.56mknooihuisenThis is the guide I followed, just in case it helps: https://support.flowroute.com/SIP_Trunking_and_Voice/PBX__Configuration_Guides/Asterisk/Configure_Asterisk_13
02:12.28SamotNo, I know.
02:12.29SamotIt's wrong.
02:12.36SamotTemplates don't use brackets
02:13.02SamotThey use parentheses
02:13.18mknooihuisenOkay... forgive me, been out of the loop since ARI was new.
02:13.32SamotThat's not  your fault.
02:13.38SamotFlowroute has the wrong instructions.
02:14.05Samot<PROTECTED>
02:14.17SamotAnd so do the others.
02:14.25SamotThat's your issue
02:14.46SamotIt's not loading the proper template with the context=from-trunk
02:15.21SamotSo basically it sees [flowroute4] as a peer with one setting, the host
02:15.29SamotNo context so it defaults to "default"
02:16.40SamotSo in your sip.conf, anywhere you have [flowroute-trunk] next to another section name.
02:16.56Samotflowroute0, flowroute1, etc. Change the brackets to parentheses.
02:17.23mknooihuisenAnd we're happily saying hello to the world
02:17.57Samothttps://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Using+Templates
02:18.32SamotFor the record, templates have been around for a long time.
02:18.37*** join/#asterisk akay (akay@unaffiliated/akay)
02:18.47SamotJust that Flowroute is really wrong in their example config.
02:19.52SamotWhich is kind of funny considering that right below that derped config example it says "It becomes simple to use the template by then putting the same in () after the objects that need to use the template. "
02:20.25Samot^^ That is correct. The example they show is completely wrong.
02:20.43SamotSomeone forgot to hit the shift key when making that template.
02:20.58mknooihuisenYeah... also, note that the 'register => ...' line in their code is technically in a comment
02:21.12SamotWell that's because it's optional
02:21.21SamotI don't use SIP registration with Flowroute.
02:21.25SamotI do IP peering/auth
02:21.39SamotSo that line is pointless for me.
02:22.05mknooihuisenAh, it's actually pointless for me too, then.  It was just an attempt to fix this problem
02:22.18mknooihuisenI've got an IP Whitelist as well.
02:22.43SamotThe type PEER doesn't do registration
02:22.55SamotSince the host is the IP/hostname you're connecting to
02:23.20SamotSo if a call comes in from another IP/hostname, it doesn't auth on that peer.
02:23.51mknooihuisenSensible enough
02:26.46mknooihuisenI think this answers another question I had, which is how to manage DID's from 2 separate accounts, but it looks like I can just substitute tech prefix and passwords and use other contexts
02:30.37mknooihuisenAnyways, thanks so much for the help, Samot.  I would've been banging my head against the keyboard forever on that one.
02:31.56mknooihuisenAs you can imagine, google didn't have any results where the default context was used, even though a different one was (supposedly) being set.
02:38.34mknooihuisenI just submitted a ticket to Flowroute to hopefully get this updated.
04:11.43*** join/#asterisk aness (~aness@cm-84.209.48.16.getinternet.no)
04:13.03*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@91.237.94.68)
04:29.25*** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com)
04:37.37*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl)
05:03.23*** join/#asterisk aness (~aness@cm-84.212.112.47.getinternet.no)
05:54.07*** join/#asterisk cryptic (~cryptic@142.196.170.87)
06:05.35*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.170)
07:45.24*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@91.237.94.68)
08:11.24*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@105.4.6.255)
08:16.19*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net)
08:16.23*** join/#asterisk cryptic (~cryptic@142.196.170.87)
08:37.33*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@105.4.6.255)
08:39.50*** join/#asterisk Bounceman (b92009fa@gateway/web/freenode/ip.185.32.9.250)
08:41.48BouncemanHi, we have a central asterisk in our environment which routes call to different upstream operators(in conjunction with Kamailio). Our upstream providers seem to generate ringtones for us, which is fine. Except for the fact that the proper indication is missing for international destinations. Is it a bad idea for asterisk (B2BUA) to generate the ringtones by its own with the proper tonezone?
08:42.14BouncemanUpstream <-> Kamailio <-> Asterisk <-> Kamailio <-> Customer PBX
08:42.39BouncemanAsterisk serves as the media gateway between the two legs
09:16.52*** join/#asterisk sibyakin (~sibyakin@188.162.228.165)
09:21.37*** join/#asterisk DanB_ (~DanB@clt-195.192.207.17.ip-anschluss.net)
09:44.59*** join/#asterisk mehale (~mehale@62.28.101.23)
10:13.45mehalehello, I need to run g729 on a virtual cloud server (Xeon (Skylake, IBRS)). I compiled it, but it causes huge delay, around 2 seconds, when I have [pstn trunk g729]<-asterisk->[pstn trunk g729] call.
10:14.03mehalewould you suggest any already compiled version, or changing any compile option?
10:14.19mehaleor even any asterisk setting that could be introducing this extra delay?
10:46.35*** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPE64777d632383-CM64777d632380.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
10:46.37*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@91.237.94.68)
11:29.57*** join/#asterisk SebastienThiry (~Thunderbi@217.82-65-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be)
11:35.20dritskallei dont know anything about g729 use - but i doubt how it is compiled will cause a 2 second delay
11:37.08*** join/#asterisk CatCow97 (~mine9@c-24-22-38-85.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
11:39.26*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@105.8.3.149)
11:41.46sibiriathe problem is likely in the other trunk stumbling over something
11:42.48sibiriai've never had any issues with delays when using g729
11:43.12mehalethe trunks are from good providers, they used to work ok on another asterisk installation.
11:43.38mehalewhen I use either trunk directly in a softphone, they work ok.
11:44.07mehalebut there is this weird delay when I route the incoming call from A to B
11:44.14*** join/#asterisk Sepultura (~Sepultura@unaffiliated/sepultura)
12:14.47*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216.191.106.165)
12:31.57*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net)
12:34.34*** join/#asterisk qxork (~qxork@unaffiliated/qxork)
12:37.47*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (~James_Axl@41.249.152.29)
12:45.22[TK]D-Fendermehale, You're comparing a situation with no * in the middle to one without.  That's an entire extra hope and processing.  Go test using that same server and different codecs.
12:56.34*** join/#asterisk Oatmeal (Suzeanne@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/suzeanne)
13:03.17mehale[TK]D-Fender: I cant change the provider's codec. to the softphone it tanslates to whatever other codec. Between the two providers I guess it shouldnt even translate, as they both are G729. Maybe I have some wrong setting that may be causing it to translate..
13:03.35mehalehow can I see if  agiven call is being translated?
13:04.39[TK]D-Fenderso far I don't see you removing this translation
13:04.55[TK]D-FenderSo you can't blame the transformation itself for the issue until you do
13:05.13[TK]D-Fenderbecause otherwise it could be purely in the additional hop + server latency
13:05.36[TK]D-FenderAnd you should KNOW if it's translated or not.  You define the codecs for your peers
13:08.23Samotmehale: What is this "delay"?
13:08.33SamotI mean, "delay" is vague
13:08.46mehale2 seconds. what I say takes 2 seconds to reach other side.
13:08.52mehalequite annoying.
13:08.58SamotAnd where are  you seeing this delay?
13:09.04SamotWhen you make a call or in the logs?
13:09.57SamotIn other words, are you picking up a handset the dialing and the delay is in what you hear on the call?
13:30.02mehaleyes, I hear the delay. SHould it be logged anywhere?
13:31.36SamotHave  you compared this to the actual debugs and logs?
13:31.51SamotHearing "delay" doesn't mean the call is being delayed in any way
13:31.55SamotOutside of ringback.
13:32.56SamotAlso, phones have "timeouts"
13:33.34SamotFor the digits being presented. If there is not "Send now" type command to tell the phone to send the digits once a pattern is matched right away, the phone will timeout waiting for new digits.
13:33.42SamotUsually 2-3 seconds is the standard.
13:34.24SamotSo if  you are dialing 1NXXNXXXXXX and the phone either doesn't have a pattern to match that or doesn't have a "send now" after receiving the last digit, it could be waiting for more digits before sending the call to the system
13:34.28SamotThus your delay.
13:35.18[TK]D-FenderHe's talking audio delay in conversation....
13:35.41[TK]D-Fender<mehale> 2 seconds. what I say takes 2 seconds to reach other side.
13:36.03mehaleI say Hello, the other party will only hear it 2 seconds after I said.
13:36.35SamotEvery party?
13:36.41SamotOr just certain calls?
13:36.54mehaleevery party using these 2 providers.
13:37.07mehaleAs I mentioned the codec, I thought it was quite obvious that the delay was in the audio ;)
13:37.31SamotDelay in audio can be poor Internet
13:37.46SamotAnd not related to Asterisk at all
13:37.51SamotJust keep that in mind.
13:39.05SamotAnd these providers only do g729?
13:40.32mehaleyep, they only do 729
13:40.59mehaleSamot, those are providers with good reputation, and my * is at hetzner.de, also has good quality network.
13:41.23SamotSo everything from the endpoint (phone/softphone) to the provider is g729?
13:41.25mehaleaudio quality is ok, no clipping. but, it is delayed.
13:41.50mehaleSamot: [pstn trunk g729]<-asterisk->[pstn trunk g729]
13:42.50SamotSo wait..
13:43.06SamotIts Caller --> PSTN --> Asterisk --> PSTN ---> Callee
13:43.29*** join/#asterisk lbazan (~LoKoMurdo@fedora/LoKoMurdoK)
13:43.33mehaleyep
13:43.53mehaleit used to work with a much better delay, on another asterisk installation.
13:44.28mehalethis aonther one was a PIAF, with all that crap that comes enabled and freepbx. the new one is plain asterisk with no fancy stuff.
13:44.46SamotWell, not just no "fancy" stuf
13:45.01SamotNo preconfigurations that you now have to do on your own.
13:45.23mehalefreepbx has a lot of stuf that is surplus to my needs.
13:45.30SamotOK
13:45.32SamotThat's fair.
13:45.39SamotBut FreePBX also does all the configuration of the basic stuff
13:46.04SamotSo perhaps there is something in your configuration or setup that is different or missing due to this.
13:46.55mehaleyes, there might be. is there anything that usually causes this audio delay?
13:47.45SamotAre you using chan_sip or chan_pjsip?
13:49.59mehalechan_sip
13:50.15Samotpastebin the configs for the trunks
13:51.03mehaleone sec
13:54.50mehalehttps://pastebin.ca/4037842
13:55.49Samotallow=G729 <-- this only works if there is a disallow= before it.
13:56.02SamotAnd you have no codecs defined on the other trunk
13:57.12mehalediallow=* and then allow=G729?
13:57.34SamotOne of your providers is behind NAT? nat=force_rport,comedia
13:57.36SamotNo
13:57.38Samotdisallo=all
13:57.40Samotdisallow=all
13:57.42SamotNot *
13:58.14SamotNo real ITSP is behind NAT.
13:58.19mehaleroger, ok
13:58.41mehalehm, I dont know why that nat entry
13:58.53mehalemaybe thats from the backup conf I had.
13:58.56SamotWell that provider trunk is missing codec settings
13:59.00mehalelemme try withott that
13:59.01SamotAnd is being told it's behind NAT
13:59.28SamotShow your [general] section of the sip.conf
14:03.37mehalehttps://pastebin.ca/4037845
14:03.45*** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50)
14:04.27mehalejust tested now without the nat entry in the trunk, lag is now 3 secs
14:04.39SamotDid you set the codec?
14:04.58SamotBecause you're allowing alaw and ulaw in the general
14:05.07SamotWith no codec config, either of those can be done
14:05.11SamotSo you could be transcoding
14:06.29mehaleSamot: yes I disallowed all and allowed 729
14:06.45SamotWhat have the providers said about this?
14:06.57mehalethey dont help
14:08.04Samot9:40:56 AM <mehale> Samot, those are providers with good reputation, and my * is at hetzner.de, also has good quality network.
14:08.05*** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/chainsaw)
14:08.15SamotHow can they have a good reputation when they don't help?
14:08.40mehalethey say it is ok.
14:10.37mehaleanyway, that delay only happens in pstn to pstn
14:10.52mehalenot when one of the endpoints is softphone
14:20.15mehalewhat are the best practices to have a non firewalled asterisk?
14:20.28mehaleI see that I have some ip's trying to register to mine
14:20.33*** join/#asterisk puzzled (~puzzled@2001:982:1097:1::1:3)
14:22.16[TK]D-Fender<mehale> what are the best practices to have a non firewalled asterisk? <- ***Firewall it***
14:22.28mehaleok
14:22.57[TK]D-FenderYou name & describe the tool used to control those things ... then ask what tool you should use....
14:23.04ChainsawYou can stop a fair amount of shenigans by going TCP/TLS only.
14:23.22mehalewhen you need softphones running on mobile phones accessing it, what do you do?
14:23.25ChainsawOpening UDP 5060 to the wider internet is not wise. Unless you plan to offer free telephony for all, because that's what it's going to turn into.
14:23.37SamotWell
14:23.43SamotTCP/TLS is not a real answer for that
14:23.47SamotAt all.
14:24.07mehaleI heard something about doorknocking, but I never found anything about that on google
14:24.07ChainsawIt prevents IP-spoofed scanning, which is how a lot of trouble starts.
14:24.10ChainsawYou'd be surprised.
14:24.13SamotWell
14:24.26SamotAs someone who has been working at providers for over a decade, it's not the answer.
14:24.33SamotSo I really wouldn't be surprised.
14:25.06ChainsawIt's not the only measure you take. But staying off the suckers list helps reduce your incoming scan traffic.
14:25.21SamotExcept for the fact that there's no TLS on the PSTN
14:25.47ChainsawTransposing SIP advice into PSTN just to win an argument is a bit daft.
14:26.02SamotSo if you want to substitute more resources as the answer to a problem that has many other solutions,  go for it.
14:27.46*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@105.0.7.152)
14:28.47SamotThere are real and practical measures to take for SIP security in general before having to fall back on TCP/TLS
14:29.02mehalewhere can I read about them?
14:29.09SamotGoogle.
14:29.16*** join/#asterisk bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qditvzuduizcjqup)
14:29.16*** mode/#asterisk [+o bford] by ChanServ
14:29.22SamotSome of it is general security
14:29.25mehalethanks
14:30.05mehalewhat about doorknocking
14:30.18mehaleor whatever this may be called.
14:30.43mehaleupon registration a string would serve as a trigger to the firewall.
14:30.55mehaleor something like that, as I understood from what I heard.
14:33.21SamotYou need to have some sort of rules for that
14:33.25SamotFor example...
14:33.36SamotI only expect traffic from ARIN (North America) IPs.
14:34.00SamotSo all other IP blocks are denied access but I have rules and filtering...
14:34.05mehaleok
14:34.05SamotFor ARIN.
14:37.26mehalehm, that generates a bunch of rules...
14:37.34mehalejust for a sall country
14:37.51Chainsawmehale: What you're thinking of is "port knocking", not "door knocking".
14:37.59mehaleok
14:44.35*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@105.12.5.234)
14:44.36*** join/#asterisk mhache (~mhache@CPE00005e000105-CM00fc8d221b00.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
14:45.03igcewielingTodays question: in the USA from a legality point of view is using a voicemail password of 1234 considered a failure to do due diligence?
14:50.58[TK]D-FenderNo
15:03.50*** join/#asterisk Cory (~Cory@unaffiliated/cory)
15:11.08*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@105.12.5.234)
15:16.40*** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com)
15:58.10*** join/#asterisk mhache_ (~mhache@198.164.250.208)
16:03.15*** join/#asterisk mhache (~mhache@CPE00005e000105-CM00fc8d221b00.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
16:44.12*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.164)
16:59.29*** join/#asterisk qxork_ (~qxork@unaffiliated/qxork)
17:48.56*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (~James_Axl@105.158.148.243)
17:52.38*** join/#asterisk dadrc (~quassel@unaffiliated/dadrc)
17:54.45*** join/#asterisk mhache_ (~mhache@198.164.250.208)
17:57.35*** join/#asterisk dadrc (~quassel@unaffiliated/dadrc)
18:06.54*** join/#asterisk mhache (~mhache@CPE00005e000105-CM00fc8d221b00.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
18:12.56*** join/#asterisk degenerate (~degenerat@S0106689e199caaf4.no.shawcable.net)
18:13.48*** join/#asterisk mhache_ (~mhache@198.164.250.208)
18:20.03*** join/#asterisk mhache (~mhache@CPE00005e000105-CM00fc8d221b00.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
18:39.24*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (uid299068@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
18:39.24*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
18:50.59*** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@84-115-150-8.cable.dynamic.surfer.at)
18:51.14*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@91.237.94.68)
19:12.52*** join/#asterisk aness (~aness@cm-84.212.112.47.getinternet.no)
19:32.30*** join/#asterisk mhache_ (~mhache@CPE00005e000105-CM00fc8d221b00.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
19:37.03*** join/#asterisk mhache (~mhache@198.164.250.208)
20:07.09*** join/#asterisk Vooray (~Vooray@broadband-188-32-13-157.ip.moscow.rt.ru)
20:58.15*** join/#asterisk Allears (~Allears@184.167.204.82)
21:01.06AllearsAnyone able to provide a hint about modifying the built in unattended transfer context?  (please forgive me if I don't have proper terminology)
21:02.03filethere is no built in unattended transfer context
21:02.17AllearsWhen we dial our transfer code it plays an audio file that says "transfer", we would like to stop this from happening, preferably by changing the built in method that's being used.
21:02.50filethat isn't a context, it's the DTMF based transfer feature which has to be explicitly enabled on the call
21:04.06Allears@file, i see that there is a possibility to give things a different "transfer context", so I was assuming there was just a default one that it was using.
21:04.27Allears@file, thank you for your information, btw.
21:04.40filethat controls what context is used for transferring to, doesn't control the DTMF feature flow (the transfer playback)
21:05.10Allears@file, do you know of any way to stop this "transfer" sound file from being played when we dial transfer code?
21:05.31fileI doubt there's a way, as it's not what most people would want but dunno
21:07.27Allears@file, thanks again.
21:27.01*** join/#asterisk joako (~joako@opensuse/member/joak0)
21:29.07*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2)
21:29.45[TK]D-FenderAllears, what are you using for a phone?
21:37.16*** join/#asterisk Dovid (~dovid@ool-45738ae3.dyn.optonline.net)
21:37.55Dovidhow do I use media cache in asterisk? It seems to be native but when I tru to play from a url it says it cant find the file and there is no core media option (testing on asterisk 15)
21:40.28Dovidnm. found it
22:06.27*** join/#asterisk tomaluca95 (~quassel@kde/developer/tomaluca)
22:27.50AllearsD-Fender, we're using some analog phones connected through a fxs port
22:30.52*** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2a02:b18:581:10:19e7:1ca9:33b8:8e4d)
22:34.16[TK]D-FenderAllears, on a DAHDI card?
22:35.36AllearsD-Fender, i'm sorry I'm a newb enough not to know the answer to that question. Is there a way I can verify from within asterisk config?
22:35.54[TK]D-FenderYou don't know what piecve of hardware your phones are pluged into?
22:37.22AllearsD-Fender, I'm being told it is DAHDI
22:37.31[TK]D-FenderYou can't see?
22:38.12[TK]D-FenderThis is very odd not to have a definitive answer for if you're the one working on the box....
22:39.19AllearsI'm not the only one working on it.
22:39.35Allearsand we are both very new to asterisk.
22:40.35AllearsIt is definitely a DAHDI card
22:42.07*** join/#asterisk qxork (~qxork@unaffiliated/qxork)
22:46.01*** join/#asterisk rpifan (~rpifan@2600:1:c161:a5a1:604a:23f7:7780:d394)
22:46.08*** join/#asterisk chris349 (~office@104-12-70-21.lightspeed.miamfl.sbcglobal.net)
22:47.04chris349Can someone tell me what is the right way to seutp a SIP trunk between 2x Asterisk servers and be able to set whatever caller ID I want? I.e.: have it authenticate by some predefined username and not by caller ID AKA SIP From: header
22:47.22*** join/#asterisk sibyakin (~sibyakin@188.162.228.225)
22:47.39chris349Because right now I have a hell of a time with it. Trunk works to make direct calls, but fails when I try to do an unattended transfer
22:48.19[TK]D-Fenderchan_sip : set the fromuser to the username, set sendrpid & trustrpid to "yes" all on both sides
22:49.33AllearsD-fender, @file thank you both for your help.
22:50.12chris349I will try that, but is there a reason why a transfered call just fails/drops without showing some error? its very strange
22:51.34chris349The moment I hit transfer the console just logs: Channel SIP/6002-00010243 left 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge
22:53.20chris349And is type=peer the best to use, or would type=friend have less dropped calls?
22:54.47[TK]D-Fenderno
22:54.55[TK]D-Fenderauth is auth
22:55.31[TK]D-Fender<chris349> The moment I hit transfer the console just logs: Channel SIP/6002-00010243 left 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge <- and this isn't actual "debug"  you need to have sip debug enabled and actually see the packets to know what the really process was
22:55.48[TK]D-FenderHowever You can't leve a bridge if the call wasn't accepted in the first palce
22:56.02[TK]D-Fenderwhich is what would never have happened if it failed to match based on the From:
22:56.07[TK]D-Fenderso that clearly isn't it
23:25.41*** join/#asterisk JustSighDudes (~rashid@unaffiliated/justsighdudes)
23:31.09JustSighDudesHey guys, I'm using the latest LTS Asterisk (13?). I have a question about Queues. When "Queue no answer" is set to Yes, and no one answers the call, then the call isn't logged in the CDR. When it's set to know, then the call is logged in the CDR as ANSWERED even if no one answers.
23:31.22JustSighDudesAny ideas on where I should look for why that's happening?
23:31.38JustSighDudesEven though I feel like this is expected behavior and I'm misunderstanding something
23:48.59*** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat62@2600:100e:b043:8ba1:f0af:5ada:446d:9a3b)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.