IRC log for #asterisk on 20170912

00:01.38*** join/#asterisk Oatmeal (~Suzeanne@gateway/vpn/privateinternetaccess/suzeanne)
00:11.28*** join/#asterisk tuxd00d (~tuxd00d@ip68-106-11-138.ph.ph.cox.net)
00:19.49*** join/#asterisk j-fish (uid178161@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-delgcadelxxlspmv)
00:23.58*** join/#asterisk zopsi_ (~zopsi@dir.ac)
00:24.20*** join/#asterisk dobson` (~dobson@68.ip-149-56-14.net)
00:32.10*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@vc-nat-gp-s-41-13-8-98.umts.vodacom.co.za)
00:43.54*** join/#asterisk almostworking (~almostwor@unaffiliated/almostworking)
00:51.25*** join/#asterisk iheartlinux (~jwpierce3@li974-67.members.linode.com)
00:53.01*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@41.13.8.98)
02:56.32*** join/#asterisk cryptic (~cryptic@67-8-35-31.res.bhn.net)
03:33.14*** join/#asterisk elcontrastador (~textual@c-67-182-43-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
03:34.46*** join/#asterisk dakudos (~dakudos@c-73-153-12-13.hsd1.co.comcast.net)
03:51.28*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@vc-nat-gp-s-41-13-28-208.umts.vodacom.co.za)
03:54.07*** join/#asterisk startledmarmot (~startledm@cpe-75-82-221-87.socal.res.rr.com)
06:33.32*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
06:36.29*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (6d46bad8@gateway/web/freenode/ip.109.70.186.216)
06:36.32jamesaxlhi
06:38.08*** join/#asterisk FarhaadN (~Farhad@82.99.206.194)
06:39.09*** join/#asterisk J0hnSteel (~J0hnSteel@92.55.116.178)
06:40.52FarhaadNin asterisk 14 i set /etc/asterisk/logger.conf full log to :
06:40.52FarhaadN[logfiles]
06:40.52FarhaadNconsole => debug,error,notice,verbose,warning
06:40.52FarhaadNfull => debug,error,notice,verbose,warning
06:41.16FarhaadNbut when i tail -f /var/log/asterisk/full
06:41.22FarhaadNdialplan dont show
06:42.33FarhaadNbut when in asterisk -r enter command : core set verbose 10 and dont close
06:42.44FarhaadNin full log show the log
06:44.41jamesaxlis it possible to get client tel number?
06:51.54*** join/#asterisk androidz (~androidz@49.151.79.83)
06:55.38androidzHi, I'd like to ask a question regarding AMI logins. Anyone on?
06:59.23androidzMy logins aren't appearing in the asterisk CLI, normally I see xxxx logged from 127.0.0.1  or something similar... now it just doesn't show up at all.
07:00.55androidzI haven't changed anything from the config files.
07:11.55*** join/#asterisk tuxian (~tuxian@igilmour.plus.com)
07:14.21*** join/#asterisk defsdoor (~andy@cpc120600-sutt6-2-0-cust177.19-1.cable.virginm.net)
07:16.37*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
07:22.46*** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
07:24.50FarhaadNin asterisk 14 i set /etc/asterisk/logger.conf full log to :
07:24.50FarhaadN[logfiles]
07:24.50FarhaadNconsole => debug,error,notice,verbose,warning
07:24.50FarhaadNfull => debug,error,notice,verbose,warning
07:24.50FarhaadNbut when i tail -f /var/log/asterisk/full
07:24.50FarhaadNdialplan log dont show
07:24.50FarhaadNbut when in asterisk -r enter command : core set verbose 10 and dont close
07:24.51FarhaadNin full log show the log
07:24.51FarhaadNwhat am i doing?
07:32.39*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net)
07:42.40*** part/#asterisk FarhaadN (~Farhad@82.99.206.194)
08:00.48*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
08:05.34*** join/#asterisk davlefou (~davlefou@unaffiliated/davlefou)
08:21.01*** join/#asterisk evil_gordita (robert@ip70-188-41-127.rn.hr.cox.net)
08:24.22*** join/#asterisk tmuwa (~mueller@gatekeeper.loca.net)
08:24.52tmuwaGood morning!
09:04.59*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (6d46bad8@gateway/web/freenode/ip.109.70.186.216)
09:05.03jamesaxlhi
09:05.27jamesaxlCould you help about asterisk support realtime?
09:13.26*** join/#asterisk Kaian (~kaian@212.81.221.228)
09:25.48*** join/#asterisk tuxian (~tuxian@194.12.3.67)
09:50.26*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
09:56.37*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
09:57.22*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
10:23.13*** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@CPE64777dd7e053-CM64777dd7e050.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
10:36.43*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net)
10:46.35*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
10:52.04*** join/#asterisk wdoekes (~walter@wjd.osso.nl)
10:52.05*** mode/#asterisk [+o wdoekes] by ChanServ
10:56.08*** join/#asterisk davlefou (~davlefou@unaffiliated/davlefou)
10:57.05*** join/#asterisk nighty- (~nighty@s229123.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp)
11:37.00*** join/#asterisk wdoekes (~walter@wjd.osso.nl)
11:37.00*** mode/#asterisk [+o wdoekes] by ChanServ
11:38.44*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl)
11:43.03*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@uls-154-73-35-201.wall.uls.co.za)
11:59.57*** join/#asterisk forgotmynick (uid24625@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hewjpaaobwtbpnax)
12:29.29*** join/#asterisk DanB (~DanB@clt-195.192.206.175.ip-anschluss.net)
12:30.14*** join/#asterisk gruetzkopf (gruetzkopf@bnc.dont-follow.us)
12:39.15*** join/#asterisk jamesaxl (6d46bad8@gateway/web/freenode/ip.109.70.186.216)
12:46.57*** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50)
12:52.14*** join/#asterisk friedrich (~friedrich@aextron.de)
12:58.25*** join/#asterisk cemotyz09 (~cemotyz09@cpe-70-121-157-202.satx.res.rr.com)
13:24.42*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216.191.106.165)
13:26.28*** join/#asterisk J0hnSteel (~J0hnSteel@92.55.116.178)
13:34.09*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
13:34.09*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
13:46.58*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net)
14:04.09*** part/#asterisk trelane (~trelane@unaffiliated/trelane)
14:04.11*** join/#asterisk [sr] (~kvirc@pal-213-228-163-73.netvisao.pt)
14:04.14[sr]hi prople
14:04.26[sr]conferense with 50 destinations (internal or external), possible?
14:09.05[sr]thats not my idea of this!!
14:10.38filepeople have used ConfBridge with more...
14:11.39[sr]hum...
14:13.02[sr]going to read on the net
14:13.12[sr]i'll ask for more help if need
14:13.13[sr]thank
14:15.37*** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-etnxorjqbyuieufi)
14:15.37*** mode/#asterisk [+o kharwell] by ChanServ
14:16.10*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net)
14:22.07*** join/#asterisk bford (d8cff501@gateway/web/freenode/ip.216.207.245.1)
14:22.07*** mode/#asterisk [+o bford] by ChanServ
14:23.22*** join/#asterisk n_byrnes (~nate@173.225.53.16)
14:25.28n_byrnesdoes anyone know if it is possible to reference multiple fields when using REALTIME in the dialplan? I'm trying to query a database table on two columns, rather than just one from within my dialplan....
14:27.41*** join/#asterisk anonymouz666 (aafe51f3@gateway/web/freenode/ip.170.254.81.243)
14:27.59n_byrnesIt looks like it ought to be able to from reading the source, there seems to be some argument parsing within a loop in the realtime functions
14:28.00anonymouz666file: what asterisk 15 is able to do with video?
14:28.16anonymouz666transcoding? mcu? recording?
14:28.33filethere will be blog posts on https://blogs.asterisk.org/ talking about what
14:28.50filebut no transcoding or recording.
14:29.42anonymouz666file: is it possible to consider both still in version 15?
14:30.10fileit's possible they could be added in the future...
14:30.23anonymouz666yeah, it's just software!
14:30.27fileI wouldn't foresee transcoding though unless someone really really wanted it...
14:30.39fileand then there's patent constraints... depending on codcs
14:31.21anonymouz666file: I have seen many people changing to another project due video restrictions on current version of asterisk.
14:32.05anonymouz666I am asterisk-user since 2004, I feel sad when I see video stuff getting behind
14:32.22fileok
14:33.23SamotThere's just not enough demand to drive that level of development, I'm sure.
14:33.47filetraditionally there hasn't been many people asking for it, yes
14:33.54*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@ip5657ee30.direct-adsl.nl)
14:34.06filewith WebRTC and many devices have built in cameras the experience and availability has changed, so it's getting more active
14:34.35fileand Asterisk 15 has a foundation to allow better video
14:34.46*** join/#asterisk friedrich (~friedrich@aextron.de)
14:34.51SamotYes but overall video isn't a common work place thing.
14:35.11SamotAs far as users go.
14:35.12fileI use it every day these days
14:35.21SamotSure a few conference rooms things
14:35.30fileit's just a nice addition to the experience
14:35.33SamotBut your agents answering basic calls..
14:35.42SamotThey aren't going to be using video for those calls.
14:35.46fileindeed
14:36.28SamotI can see the desire for video in your conference room
14:36.38SamotOr a small number of users..
14:36.39anonymouz666Samot: audio is OK, still very widely used, but things are evolving to video. Ask polycom what videos provides for their growth. The realconnect stuff etc.
14:36.51SamotBut in a 300 user office, I bet 5 would use video.
14:37.12Samot"still very widely used"
14:37.14anonymouz666it depends on what kind of company you have access to, large enterprises are heavily based on videoconferece stuff.
14:37.21SamotYes, regular phone calls are still very widely used.
14:37.32SamotRight
14:37.46SamotBut Fortune 500 companies are probably not running Asterisk.
14:38.37anonymouz666Samot: you can create a lot of value for those companies using asterisk, if you have better support for other stuff (like video recording, transcoding, etc.)
14:38.46SamotYou're comparing apples to oranges.
14:38.48anonymouz666they are using cisco
14:38.51anonymouz666skype for business
14:39.15SamotWeird.
14:39.31SamotA large enterprise being a Cisco/Windows environment.
14:39.56anonymouz666Samot: skype for business is taking cisco place as UC solution
14:40.14anonymouz666just look at gartner magic quadrant
14:40.16SamotYou're comparing a FOSS project to Microsoft/Cisco.
14:40.50SamotFOSS is not an option on the table in most enterprise businesses.
14:40.57anonymouz666Samot: I am saying that you can create value for those companies with a solution that fits their limitation, as thinking Asterisk as telephony commodity
14:40.58SamotThey want something "enterprise" and fully supported.
14:41.09SamotYou can.
14:41.22SamotI'm not arguing that point.
14:41.32*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net)
14:41.50SamotI'm arguing that a million/billion dollar company will have pickiness about using FOSS for their stuff.
14:42.06SamotAsterisk can have all the bells and the whistles in the world but it's FOSS
14:42.15SamotThat only is enough to remove it from consideration.
14:42.42SamotThey would go with Certified which allows them to pour money into what they want Asterisk to do
14:42.48SamotHave have guaranteed SLAs
14:42.58SamotThey are going to spend money on their telecom solution.
14:43.06Samot"Free" is not a consideration.
14:44.45SamotI mean..
14:44.59SamotAsterisk could do Property Management System integration.
14:45.19SamotIt would open them up to a multi-billion dollar industry.
14:45.31SamotIt would give leverage to those companies...
14:57.40*** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-llygtpvjeqzdanlv)
14:57.40*** mode/#asterisk [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ
15:36.56*** join/#asterisk rrittgarn (~rrittgarn@75-150-221-205-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
16:05.19*** join/#asterisk DanB_ (~DanB@clt-195.192.206.175.ip-anschluss.net)
16:21.44*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@91.237.94.4)
16:37.19*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
16:40.05*** join/#asterisk DanB_ (~DanB@clt-195.192.206.175.ip-anschluss.net)
16:45.54*** join/#asterisk alpharde (~alphard@155.254.32.77)
16:48.09*** join/#asterisk s-mutin (~s-mutin@85.234.114.134)
17:00.26*** join/#asterisk tehgooch (tehgooch@unaffiliated/tehgooch)
17:12.08*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.165)
17:16.10*** join/#asterisk salviadud (~ralfalfa@189-211-190-134.static.axtel.net)
17:24.54*** join/#asterisk RovingWriter (~rubble@unaffiliated/rovingwriter)
17:42.05*** join/#asterisk somepoortech (~somepoort@72-0-128-151.static.firstlight.net)
17:56.52*** join/#asterisk joshelson (~joshelson@198.232.219.254)
18:06.18*** join/#asterisk woddy (~woddy@unaffiliated/woddy)
18:10.12*** join/#asterisk Kunsi (franzi@unaffiliated/kunsi)
18:20.45*** join/#asterisk mcargile (~mcargile@rrcs-97-76-33-146.se.biz.rr.com)
18:28.21[TK]D-Fenderwoddy, For your question in #freepbx , yes and no.  They off a free bolt-on GUI for Asterisk.  They also offer a free ISO to do a "full install" of an OS with all the bits to get an SMB PBX running.  They also sell ready-made appliances, commercial modules, etc, but those are all OPTIONAL
18:29.07[TK]D-FenderSo your question of "are they a business" might not apply to your actual goal : "Do they have free stuff I can use" <- if that's the better question
18:34.51SamotAnd well..
18:35.00SamotAsterisk = Business in the same same vein.
18:36.58*** part/#asterisk woddy (~woddy@unaffiliated/woddy)
18:37.07SamotHahahahaha
18:38.08SamotApparently having a PBX system that is from a business type place is out of the question.
18:38.39[TK]D-FenderI refuse to use Fedora because RedHat is a business!
18:38.46[TK]D-FenderSame with Ubuntu!
18:39.04[TK]D-FenderHow dare they have ANYTHING to do with making money even if I get free use of thier products to the capacity I need!
18:39.16SamotWell..
18:39.22SamotYou're forgetting something
18:39.24[TK]D-Fender#TRIGGERED
18:40.00Samot"How dare they try to make money even if I use it for free, while *I AM* trying to make money off free stuff"
18:40.52[TK]D-FenderBut enough about me ... what do YOU think about me? #narcissistmuch
18:45.31*** join/#asterisk shanth__ (~shanth@wsip-98-182-126-226.ph.ph.cox.net)
18:51.11*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@91.237.94.4)
19:05.04*** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-179-40-170.cust.bezeqint.net)
19:11.52*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
19:28.35*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
19:28.35*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
19:35.20*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
19:35.20*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
19:45.07*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
19:45.07*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
19:48.49*** join/#asterisk miralin1 (~Thunderbi@195.209.246.194)
19:54.10*** join/#asterisk somepoortech (~somepoort@72-0-128-229.static.firstlight.net)
20:18.10*** join/#asterisk tuxian (~tuxian@igilmour.plus.com)
20:29.42*** join/#asterisk miralin (~Thunderbi@91.237.94.4)
20:36.05*** join/#asterisk fonefreak (~root@c-76-105-87-143.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
20:43.21lvlinuxdoes * support t.38 faxing direct now, or is it still passthrough like used to be?
20:46.29SamotT.38 is encapsulation
20:46.44*** part/#asterisk mcargile (~mcargile@rrcs-97-76-33-146.se.biz.rr.com)
20:54.22lvlinuxYes but can Asterisk originate the fax and be able to send it with T.38 itself with Sendfax() like it can over g.711, or must an ATA and real fax machine be used for T.38?
20:54.59SamotNo. You can set t.38 on a peer
20:55.42SamotT.38 doesnt happen in the initial SDP offering
20:55.47lvlinuxno it can't do it or no you don't have to use an ATA/fax machine?
20:56.10SamotYou dont have to use a device
20:56.35SamotT.38 doesnt happen until the other side says it does
20:56.45SamotSo...
20:57.12SamotIt never starts t.38
20:58.03lvlinuxYes I knew that, so just to make sure I'm understanding, if I have t38 parameters enabled in pjsip.conf and do SendFax(), AND the other side supports T.38 and tells that to Asterisk, it will start using it for that fax. Right?
20:59.15SamotYes.
20:59.23SamotIts an option of sendfax
20:59.26SamotHas been.
20:59.37SamotIt will only use it if the other channel has it
21:00.07SamotSo if this goes out to somewhere that doesnt use t.38, it wont be used
21:00.40SamotNothing "forces" it on ourbound
21:01.39lvlinuxk
21:04.36lvlinuxSo does my t.38 supporting SIP provider unencapsulate and send regular fax tones into the PSTN on the other side, or does it stay T.38 further along? (In other words does the receiving fax machine have to support anything special or can it be an old junker "dumb" fax machine?)
21:05.23lvlinuxNevermind, T.38 is over IP so obviously it would have to convert to standard fax tones I guess...
21:06.03SamotIt depends on what they do with it.
21:06.12lvlinuxoh?
21:06.17SamotIf they are touching the media in someway they need to support it
21:06.31*** join/#asterisk tuxian (~tuxian@igilmour.plus.com)
21:06.33SamotIf they aren't touching the media, they don't need to support it.
21:07.11SamotT.38 is an "Otherside" thing.
21:07.38SamotWhen someone sends you a fax, the initial SDP is just the standard g711 (if that's being used)
21:08.11SamotWhen Asterisk is the one answering the call and you have t.38 enabled...
21:08.21fauxalliancegood thing i stocked up on thermal paper in 1992
21:08.24SamotAsterisk will send back SDP with T.38
21:08.40SamotCausing a Re-INVITE from the other side.
21:08.55SamotIf *THEY* do not support T.38, the call is done.
21:09.35fauxalliancei've only managed to get T.38 working internally, once it hits the cloud, poof!
21:09.59SamotI've been using T.38 for a decade plus and it works.
21:10.13fauxalliancei.e. if you fart into the wind, whilst holding a lit match overhead, T.38 WORKS!
21:11.04lvlinuxWill it not fall back to fax tones over g711 if the re-invite doesn't get an ok?
21:11.18fauxalliancehell no
21:11.27SamotNope.
21:11.33lvlinuxwow that stinks
21:11.35SamotBecause you want T.38
21:11.43SamotThat's why it's an OTHER SIDE thing.
21:11.52SamotIt doesn't happen until the other side says they can do it.
21:11.58fauxalliancet.38 is OK if you only want to rx 90% of the faxes sent to yo
21:11.59fauxallianceu
21:12.01SamotBecause they will reply back with T.38 in the SDP
21:12.08SamotWhatever.
21:12.13SamotFAX is best effort.
21:12.16SamotEven on POTS.
21:12.31lvlinuxYes I've had plenty fail even on a good old analog line
21:12.33fauxalliancei still use USR modems for fax. on a copper line, with hylafax.
21:12.42SamotFAX is best effort.
21:12.44fauxallianceindee
21:12.46fauxallianced
21:13.32fauxalliancei haven't looked at iaxmodem in a while
21:13.59*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
21:13.59*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
21:14.30lvlinuxI've tried to avoid fax for years and migrate clients over to email whenever possible, but the odd required fax always pops up here and there and is always a pain when I haven't set everything up for it already.
21:14.52SamotWell the emergence of FoIP devices over the past 5-6 years has changed things too.
21:15.05fauxalliancelvlinux: i usually mandate a "power fail" extension, a copper line, that the fax shit connects too
21:15.07fauxallianceto
21:15.09SamotIt's all I use now.
21:15.43fauxallianceSamot: iaxmodem?
21:15.47SamotNo.
21:15.51SamotA FoIP device.
21:15.55fauxallianceahh
21:16.01SamotIt only uses FAX protocols.
21:16.04fauxalliancei'll play again, what do you recommend
21:16.05SamotIt doesn't do voice.
21:16.11lvlinuxfauxalliance: that's what I do if they say they have a lot of faxes. But I haven't tried to mess with T.38 until just recently.
21:16.15fauxalliancei.e. a t.38 ATA for fax
21:16.22SamotThere are various FoIP platforms/devices
21:16.48SamotI use a dedicated FoIP platform.
21:16.50fauxalliancei build the platform, name a good device
21:17.08SamotMost of those are proprietary
21:17.16fauxalliancesee aslo: avaya
21:17.17SamotThey go with the platform they talk to.
21:17.25fauxalliancehow disgusting
21:17.29SamotYeah.
21:17.31SamotCrazy
21:17.45fauxallianceso much for IETF standards
21:18.32fauxalliancere-reads https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3362
21:19.13lvlinuxI guess I need to read over that as well.
21:19.28lvlinuxThanks for the info guys.
21:19.34SamotI'm not sure how that applies.
21:19.51SamotSince all these vendors are design devices using the same method.
21:20.13SamotThe devices are endpoints, danglies for the actual product.
21:20.21*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
21:20.21*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
21:20.22SamotThe FAX platform
21:20.33fauxallianceSamot: i.e. Avaya has their OWN SIP standard
21:20.40fauxallianceit's not SIP per se
21:20.45fauxallianceit's a clusterfuck
21:20.49fauxallianceMWI, lol
21:21.10lvlinuxthat RFC is only for the mime type of t.38, not the protocol itself lol
21:21.29fauxalliancelvlinux: rfc4612
21:21.31fauxalliancesorry
21:21.36lvlinuxhehe
21:21.44fauxalliancehttps://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4612
21:22.03SamotYou better stop using Asterisk.
21:22.48SamotAsterisk is not 100% RFC compliant.
21:22.48fauxallianceSamot: as long as the source is open
21:22.51salviadudWhy fax, when you can scan and e-mail
21:22.53SamotOh.
21:22.56SamotI see.
21:23.10SamotRFC only matters if its' closed
21:23.18lvlinuxlol
21:23.53fauxallianceSamot: clearly not what I said
21:23.58fauxalliancebut, it helps
21:24.15fauxalliancePJSIP, BJSIP, show me the manual
21:24.56SamotYou realize that Chan_SIP and Chan_PJSIP are not the only SIP stacks out there right?
21:25.08fauxallianceSamot: i use IAX/2 a lot
21:25.21SamotWell that's not a SIP stack.
21:25.22fauxallianceso, yes
21:25.28fauxallianceother stacks
21:25.51SamotIAX != SIP
21:25.58SamotCompletely different.
21:26.20fauxallianceno, neither does all the other flavor pseudo sip stacks
21:26.32SamotIAX is not SIP
21:26.33SamotAt all
21:26.37fauxallianceSIP is a standard
21:26.42fauxalliancesome follow, some dont
21:26.43SamotIt does not fall in the "SIP Stack" category
21:27.05fauxallianceSamot: put words in my mouth, then you mince them, troll ya later
21:27.48SamotSophia, SIP-B, etc those are SIP Stacks.
21:28.02SamotLots of different SIP platforms implement their own stacks.
21:29.40fauxalliancei only call it SIP if if follows IETF standards, i.e. RFC3261.  else it's a vendors propritary bullshit, never to interoperate with anything of mine again.
21:29.54SamotOK.
21:30.22fauxalliancei slipped in IAX, but that's another stack I use.  Sophia, that was ten years ago with bluebox and the 2600hz project
21:30.36fauxallianceSofia, sp?
21:31.10SamotYeah so SIP-B follows that
21:31.16SamotSophia follows that
21:31.36SamotEven Genbands old M6 followed that pretty much
21:31.51fauxalliancecool, i'll play backwards compatability roulette next scheduled reboot
21:32.19SamotThat's pretty much the standard SBCs, SoftSwitches, Proxies use.
21:32.34fauxalliancelike the cisco SIP MANGLER
21:32.37fauxalliancei mean proxy
21:32.58SamotCisco doesn't sell that shit for non-Cisco stuff.
21:33.07SamotCisco wants you to be 100% Cisco.
21:33.11SamotThat's always been their play
21:33.51fauxalliancethats _every_vendors_GAME
21:34.53lvlinuxCisco does it so well though hehe
21:35.16fauxallianceMonopoly of Ciscoeze
21:35.24fauxallianceredundancy must be free.
21:36.44salviadudCisco hates it when you don't pay for CUCM
21:37.06fauxallianceor VRRP
21:37.08fauxalliancelol
21:38.11salviadudI think you can get something similar with Dell switches
21:38.25fauxallianceRFC5978  which is an open standard, but Cisco claims that a similar protocol with essentially the same facility is patented and licensed
21:39.20fauxalliancelike cadtrac's bloody patent on XOR
21:40.20fauxallianceyou can't patent logic. or common sense.
21:41.05RovingWritergive it time.
21:49.19*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2)
21:49.34[TK]D-FenderMy watch has more
21:49.37[TK]D-Fender...and it's ANALOG
21:50.27[TK]D-Fender#badaim
21:51.51SamotIsn't that what your dad said to your mom moments after you were conceived?
21:52.35[TK]D-Fender#zing
22:07.21*** join/#asterisk porjo (~porjo@unaffiliated/porjo)
22:16.23fauxalliance[TK]D-Fender: +1
23:03.08*** join/#asterisk SSlater (~simon@mail.favour.com.au)
23:24.35*** join/#asterisk andresmujica (~andresmmu@ubuntu/member/andresmujica)
23:24.49*** part/#asterisk andresmujica (~andresmmu@ubuntu/member/andresmujica)
23:24.57*** part/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-etnxorjqbyuieufi)
23:36.30*** join/#asterisk J0hnSteel (~J0hnSteel@92.55.116.178)
23:49.49*** join/#asterisk wabbits (~rtreleave@ip-64-140-118-201.user.start.ca)
23:50.43*** join/#asterisk mlhess (~mlhess@drupal.org/user/102818/view)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.