IRC log for #asterisk on 20170615

00:20.00*** join/#asterisk infobot (ibot@rikers.org)
00:20.00*** topic/#asterisk is #asterisk The Open Source PBX and Telephony Platform (asterisk.org) -=- LTS: 13.16.0 (2017/05/30), 11.25.1 (2016/12/08), Standard: 14.5.0 (2017/05/30); DAHDI: DAHDI-linux 2.11.1 (2016/03/01), DAHDI-tools 2.11.1 (2016/03/01); libpri 1.6.0 (2017/01/27) -=- Wiki: wiki.asterisk.org -=- Code of Conduct: bit.ly/1hH6P22 -=- Logs: bit.ly/1s4AKKu
00:37.18*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
01:32.21drmessano~happyclownpbx
01:32.22infobotcurrently in closed beta, approaching 12GB in size, uses Asterisk for its core, it pwns, eats your children (seriously), and is also now compatible with the Diahatsumashiniriki Keyotason 200LP-A11 SIP phone
01:39.26*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
02:20.19*** join/#asterisk genpaku (~genpaku@107.191.100.185)
03:14.23*** join/#asterisk boris_t (~boris_t@363103629.convex.ru)
03:40.17*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
04:41.00*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
05:16.24tuxd00ddrmessano: What’s the story with HappyClownPBX?
06:12.49*** join/#asterisk mahlon (~mahlon@martini.nu)
06:42.12*** join/#asterisk evil_gordita (robert@ip70-188-41-127.rn.hr.cox.net)
06:45.09*** join/#asterisk forgotmynick (uid24625@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-zbvuugvpyxidpbpj)
06:56.24*** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
07:04.25*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.34)
07:05.33*** join/#asterisk lankanmon_ (~LKNnet@2607:fea8:d1f:ffcb:11e0:707c:2961:d41e)
07:08.38*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56)
07:18.23*** join/#asterisk Mr_Pleb_Mgoo (~jakeb@103.46.213.148)
07:27.05*** join/#asterisk ChannelZ (~bobm@burner.com)
07:39.24*** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com)
07:40.31*** join/#asterisk CheBuzz (~CheBuzz@unaffiliated/chebuzz)
07:56.15*** join/#asterisk boris_t (~boris_t@363103629.convex.ru)
08:02.18*** join/#asterisk DanB (~DanB@clt-195.192.204.132.ip-anschluss.net)
08:06.05*** join/#asterisk stefanauss (~stefanaus@95.142.177.153)
08:12.35*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
08:16.48*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net)
08:27.38*** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@80-109-194-26.cable.dynamic.surfer.at)
08:31.35*** join/#asterisk TandyUK (~admin@2a02:13a0:a006:1:258c:a5dc:43e0:d560)
08:40.36*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net)
09:22.42*** join/#asterisk betz (~betz@ptr-91b0rf2cdydiv2t3yos.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be)
09:41.01*** join/#asterisk polysics (~polysics@95.85.20.146)
09:41.10polysicshello y'all!
09:41.32polysicsI am trying to get Asterisk to playback a Watson TTS URL
09:41.43polysicsbut I think I have hit some kind of byte limit
09:42.18polysicsPlayback('USER:PASS@stream.watsonplatform.net/text-to-speech/api/v1/synthesize?accept=audio/wav&text=Hello%20world&voice=en-US_AllisonVoice') is simple enough
09:43.59polysicsor maybe it is those ampersands!
09:51.01polysicsI just need to figure out "why" the above does not work and we should be set
09:59.18polysicsbut I actually have a simpler question
09:59.43polysicsdoes Asterisk play an HTTP URL while it is downloading, or is the file saved THEN played?
10:02.52fileit saves it and then plays currently
10:04.12polysicsso if I have another application fronting this, I might as well download and manage those files from there and just tell Asterisk to play them
10:05.00filethat is an option, yes
10:05.18polysicsis there any others?
10:05.34polysicsout of curiosity, that would work fine as far as I am concerned :)
10:05.39fileno?
10:05.45*** part/#asterisk betz (~betz@ptr-91b0rf2cdydiv2t3yos.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be)
10:06.09polysicsI guess it can either be the web app downloading the files or a bash script called from AGI but it does not substantially change much
10:57.03*** join/#asterisk ThomasKeller (~Thomas@vmx.ethz.ch)
11:45.10*** join/#asterisk xochilpili (~xochilpil@unaffiliated/xochilpili)
11:45.29xochilpilihi all
11:47.27*** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56)
11:48.04*** join/#asterisk nighty-_ (~cp@www.taiyolabs.com)
12:02.29*** join/#asterisk tcpdump (sid47591@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-peblzluxyykpesfb)
12:02.35tcpdumphello everyone.
12:05.32tcpdumpI am planning to use Asterisk for a SIP/STUN proxy/server.  I am trying to wrap my head around one more concept.  So, I have an Asterisk server and two SIP clients, on different LANs (divided by the Internet), trying to call each other. They're both connected to the SIP server. One originates a call to the other. Obviously the Asterisk server sends to second client a "ring".  When they pick up the second client does a STUN
12:05.32tcpdumpbinding request, then I assume the Asterisk server relays the public IP, port, and NAT strategy to the calling Client.
12:05.36tcpdumpThat looks right so far?
12:06.32tcpdumpSo, at that point does Client A originate a secondary SIP (point to point) connection with Client B, or is that just straight up UDP, and both use the original SIP connection for call control?
12:06.42fileAsterisk isn't a SIP/STUN proxy - each leg is independent, and the connection is between the client and Asterisk - generally Asterisk forwards media
12:07.04fileit can be configured to go directly but it provides the IP address/port as given to it by the client
12:07.33wabbitstcpdump google B2BUA = back to back user agent
12:10.03tcpdumpfile: so I was planning an using it to transport RTSP between the two clients via direct connect (using STUN).
12:10.08tcpdumpwabbits: thx
12:10.11tcpdumpgoogles
12:10.12fileAsterisk does not support RTSP
12:10.44fileif you are referring to RTP it won't forward STUN traffic between both sides, it'd be through Asterisk and not directly
12:11.00tcpdumpfile: yes, I apologize - RTP
12:12.10tcpdumpfile: so all of my RTP traffic would be proxied via the server then?
12:12.18fileyes.
12:12.35tcpdumphttps://image.slidesharecdn.com/sip-intro-101103170955-phpapp01/95/sip-for-geeks-25-638.jpg?cb=1422649144
12:12.49fileAsterisk isn't a proxy.
12:13.01tcpdumpThis diagram depicts a P2P session for RTP - Is that a different technology than Asterisk?
12:13.18fileit's not a different technology, it's a different deployment model
12:14.21fileas wabbits mentioned, Asterisk is a B2BUA
12:15.06wabbitstcpdump I suggest we could help you better if you described what you want to do in non technical terms.
12:17.51tcpdumpwabbits: thats a fair idea - I want to make a linux based media streaming device/server that serves up video over RTSP/RTP.  I want to allow clients using an app anywhere in the world access it at any time.  The thought was to use SIP and it's control protocols to initiate streaming sessions by "calling" each other.
12:18.33wabbitsDo you really want RTSP?
12:19.21wabbitsyou can serve video over rtp
12:20.00wabbitstcpdump ^
12:20.39SamotWhy do you even need Asterisk for this?
12:21.15tcpdumpwabbits: i probably do not want RTSP, just h.264 over RTP
12:21.19*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@nat-73.net011.net)
12:22.13wabbitssound pretty easy if I understand the usage model. user A calls the server and views video. Is that it?
12:22.22SamotYou also probably don't want the media to be P2P.
12:23.18*** join/#asterisk pdugas (~retentive@2001:558:6011:71:3d78:26dd:beb:dc2)
12:23.30tcpdumpSamot: the biggest reason I was looking at Asterisk is because I was told (by someone whose done it) that Asterisk was an all in one SIP server that could facilitate STUN (P2P) sessions between two clients, and then handle transporting it if the P2P session failed for some reason.
12:23.40SamotNo
12:23.45tcpdumpwabbits: yea, at a rudimentary level thats it.
12:23.46SamotThey are wrong.
12:23.59SamotAsterisk is a Telephony Engine and a B2BAU
12:24.29SamotYou tell Asterisk to use a STUN server some where else.
12:24.36SamotAsterisk does not do STUN or TURN
12:24.46tcpdumpFirst off, let me say thanks for the patients.  Im a sysamin/network admin and Im trying to wrap my head around these protocols/products that Ive never used before.
12:25.26sekilhello
12:25.39tcpdumpOk, so lets say we take the STUN factor out of the equation Asterisk could absolutely facilitate SIP/RTP calls between two clients it sounds like.
12:25.49SamotYes.
12:25.55SamotIt's a B2BUA
12:25.57tcpdumpAnd all of the  data would traverse my SIP server, basically.
12:26.01SamotYes.
12:26.09SamotGoogle: Back to Back User Agent
12:26.16SamotThat's what Asterisk does.
12:26.28SamotThe calls are between Asterisk and the endpoint.
12:26.29tcpdumpSamot: yea, wabbits sent that earlier - Im reading that now.
12:26.37SamotAsterisk bridges the channels together.
12:26.43*** join/#asterisk pdugas (~retentive@2001:558:6011:71:3d78:26dd:beb:dc2)
12:27.00fileif it's just serving up video files then there are better options out there really...
12:27.12tcpdumpso each device would have a "phone number" and more or less register at start time, and remain connected via TCP/SIP.
12:27.13*** join/#asterisk retentiveboy (~retentive@c-73-82-30-193.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
12:27.22tcpdumpfile: its real time streaming, actually.
12:27.26tcpdumpIts a camera.
12:27.28SamotWell RTP is 100% UDP
12:27.34fileeven then, there are better options
12:27.40SamotYou can do your SIP Signaling over TCP
12:27.45tcpdumpfile: what comes to mind?
12:27.51SamotBut RTP is _always_ UDP
12:27.54fileany streaming software?
12:28.07SamotWell what is the camera streaming?
12:28.26SamotAnd is it streaming all the time or only during a call?
12:28.37tcpdumpJust live video Samot  -  imagine a security camera in your home, and you want to watch it in your app.
12:28.40tcpdumponly during the call.
12:28.45sekilvlc?
12:28.47SamotWell there is a different.
12:28.51SamotDifference.
12:28.53*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@216.191.106.165)
12:29.03SamotOne is just stream video over IP
12:29.11SamotThe camera will have software mostly to remote watch that stream.
12:29.15wabbitsveal lettuce and cucumber. delicious!
12:29.50SamotThere is a difference between an IP camera
12:29.58SamotAnd a phone doing IP over SIP
12:30.05SamotWith video
12:30.51SamotIf it is just a 24/7 live video stream, then it has nothing to do with Asterisk or SIP/VoIP
12:30.58SamotThey would be two separate things.
12:31.30tcpdumpSamot: its not 24/7 only when the client wants to view it.
12:31.42SamotThere is still a difference.
12:32.06SamotThere is a difference from remotely accessing the camera and turn the video on...
12:32.17SamotThat's mainly HTTP requests...
12:32.31wabbitssound like a client->server deal and no pear protocol required.
12:32.38SamotVs. activating the video stream over SIP/RTP
12:32.45wabbitss/pear/peer
12:33.06SamotSo far the IP camera doesn't sound like anything that would require voice.
12:33.08SamotIt's just a camera.
12:33.18SamotIt can be accessed remotely and video stream turned on
12:33.18tcpdumpIt will do audio as well.
12:33.21SamotOK
12:33.25tcpdumpaudio/video.
12:33.26SamotThat has nothing to do with a CALL
12:33.37SamotIt's an IP Camera.
12:33.45SamotI had those at my data center.
12:33.53SamotI could log in remotely, watch and listen
12:34.00SamotNothing to do with a call
12:34.49*** join/#asterisk fblackburn (~fblackbur@modemcable094.94-70-69.static.videotron.ca)
12:36.19SamotDo you understand what you are confusing?
12:36.45SamotIP Camera that does audio/video over HTTP/HTTPS
12:37.00SamotVs an IP Phone with a Camera that does audio/video over SIP/RTP.
12:37.35wabbitstcpdump which does your camera support?
12:37.52tcpdumpYes and no.  I understand that those cameras use some protocol (varying from camera to camera) to facilitate connectivity within a LAN to an outside device.
12:37.57tcpdumpwabbits: Whatever I impliment. :D
12:38.04SamotIP Camera
12:38.07tcpdumpThus this discussion.
12:38.07SamotVERSUS
12:38.11SamotIP Phone with Video
12:38.17SamotTWO DIFFERENT THINGS
12:38.17wabbitsso you are making the camera?
12:38.22tcpdumpI am
12:38.35SamotWait.
12:38.38wabbitsthen you are out of your depth
12:38.41tcpdumpI dont see why my camera cant just be a phone?
12:38.43SamotYou're "building the device"?
12:38.50SamotBecause it needs to support SIP
12:39.12SamotIt needs to support Video OVER SIP
12:39.50tcpdumpI mean it doesnt have to , but it does need to work in most any network environment, even in low bandwidth, which I understand SIP handles quite well.
12:39.50wabbitsyou can buy cameras that do sip
12:40.03sekilthere are cameras with support for RSTP/RTP stacks
12:40.05Samottcpdump: Stop
12:40.14SamotYou do not understand what you are trying to do.
12:40.22SamotSIP is not an alternative to HTTP for a Camera.
12:40.56SamotA video phone will initiate video only when there is a CALL
12:41.07tcpdumpk
12:41.11SamotSo the camera has to call an endpoint
12:41.16Samotor the endpoint has to call the camera.
12:41.56*** part/#asterisk fblackburn (~fblackbur@modemcable094.94-70-69.static.videotron.ca)
12:42.12Samottcpdump; What is the actual end goal?
12:42.16SamotWhat is the purpose of this?
12:42.34SamotHow is it supposed to function from the user perspective?
12:44.40SamotYou said before this is for a "security" camera.
12:44.51SamotBut it would only be one when the user wants to view it.
12:44.57SamotThat's not really a "security" camera.
12:45.37SamotThis is sounding more like a "door" camera.
12:45.46SamotJust so you can see who is at the door and buzzing you.
12:47.52Samottcpdump: ^^
12:48.08tcpdumpreads
12:48.46tcpdumpSamot: im uisng a different protocol to handle the full time recording.
12:49.00tcpdumpso yea, in this case it would be on demand only for this piece.
12:49.03SamotSo then the video has nothing to do with the call.
12:49.06SamotNo.
12:49.12SamotThe video has nothing do with the call
12:49.18SamotThey are separate.
12:49.35SamotThe call just can't jump in and grab the video stream..
12:49.42SamotFrom a device not doing SIP/RTP
12:50.43Samottcpdump: Let me explain this another way..
12:50.53tcpdumpplease
12:51.04SamotEither the video is over SIP/RTP and thus connected to a call...
12:51.23SamotOr it's over another protocol and is completely separate from the SIP call
12:51.35SamotIf you are recording the video 24/7
12:51.43xochilpilii have a cisco spa3102, and an asterisk server and im able to make internal calls and outgoing calls, but when i do an outgoing call it disconnects me from internet, im using ADSL (ISP)
12:51.48SamotOr streaming that video 24/7 to someplace to be viewed...
12:51.51SamotIt's separate.
12:51.53SamotCompletely
12:51.59xochilpilidoes any one know what cause this?
12:52.17SamotWhy would it disconnect you from the Internet?
12:52.26xochilpiliSamot, no idea :D
12:52.28SamotAre you using the 3102 as a router as well?
12:53.04xochilpilii have set the 3102 as a "bridge" but no idea why it disconnects from internet
12:53.14SamotWhat do you mean "bridge"
12:54.22xochilpiliSamot, http://www.cisco.com/c/es_mx/support/docs/unified-communications/spa3102-voice-gateway-router/108733-pqa-108733.html
12:54.51xochilpilimy english is not  good enough to explain "what i meant for bridge"
12:55.51SamotOK well
12:56.07SamotHow is the network setup?
12:56.20SamotModem -> SPA3102 -> Router/Switch?
12:56.37tcpdumpSamot: Thanks for helping me wrap my head around it.
12:57.25xochilpiliSamot, not like that: Modem -> FortiGate -> switch -> SPA3102
12:57.39*** join/#asterisk retentiveboy (~retentive@2601:cf:4400:d8e4:b1df:ea85:cb75:3a6c)
12:57.41SamotSo why is it in Bridge mode?
12:57.50SamotBridge mode is for the router side of the 3102
12:58.10SamotYou probably have it configured wrong.
12:58.27SamotWhy it would take down the whole network...
12:58.29SamotDon't know.
12:58.33SamotNever seen that happen.
12:58.35xochilpiliusing just LAN i cant make outgoing calls
12:59.02SamotFactory default it
12:59.05SamotStart over.
12:59.14xochilpilii did it 3 times :D
12:59.44SamotThere is no reason the SPA3102 should take your network down when it drops a calls
12:59.48SamotOr anything.
12:59.57SamotSo it's either your SPA3102 or your network.
13:00.39xochilpiliSamot, just disconnects from internet, i have network, then public ip changes and for almost 4-5 secs i have no internet
13:00.52SamotOK
13:00.59SamotThis is not an Asterisk issue.
13:01.07SamotThis is an issue with your SPA3102 and/or your network
13:01.14SamotIncluding your modem and DSL connection.
13:01.27SamotNothing should cause your DSL to drop the connection.
13:01.39SamotIn regards to a call over the SPA3102.
13:01.58xochilpilioks
13:02.00xochilpilithanks
13:02.04SamotYour PPPoE connection for your DSL is dropping.
13:02.12SamotIt's why you're getting a new IP for the WAN
13:02.37SamotAgain, the SPA3102 or network issue.
13:02.38[TK]D-Fender<xochilpili> Samot, not like that: Modem -> FortiGate -> switch -> SPA3102 <---- are there other devices plugged into the OTHER side of the SPA?
13:02.58xochilpiliyes, i know that, but it's in the fortigate that PPPoE
13:03.09[TK]D-Fender<xochilpili> Samot, not like that: Modem -> FortiGate -> switch -> SPA3102 ::: -> other stuff?
13:03.22SamotAlso, there should be no reason the SPA3102 should be in "Bridge" mode..
13:03.24xochilpili[TK]D-Fender, just the phone (wireless)
13:03.35[TK]D-Fenderthen son't use Bridge
13:03.36SamotIs it plugged into the FXS port?
13:03.38[TK]D-Fenderdon't
13:03.45SamotOr the LAN port?
13:03.52SamotWhat is plugged into the LAN port?
13:03.58[TK]D-FenderI was asking about the LAN network jack
13:04.07SamotBecause there shouldn't be anything in it
13:04.09SamotReally.
13:04.21xochilpiliah, no in the LAN there's nothing, just in the WAN -> to the switch
13:04.33SamotThen there is no need for this thing to be in Bridge mode.
13:04.37SamotFactory default
13:04.39SamotRestart
13:04.47SamotDon't mess with the Router/WAN/LAN stuff
13:04.55SamotIt's not something that needs to be messed with
13:05.03xochilpiliok, will try again
13:05.06xochilpilithanks!
13:05.11*** join/#asterisk Rini (uid196547@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-vopuqtufgoovumzo)
13:06.58*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~luckman21@unaffiliated/luckman212)
13:21.01skrustyanyone know why, using realtime in pjsip, i have no transports? Enabled transport-udp-nat in pjsip.conf, but not showing up in console :/
13:22.23*** join/#asterisk davlefou (~davlefou@unaffiliated/davlefou)
13:22.40skrustyfound it!
13:22.51skrustywas an issue further up in the config :/
13:24.31*** join/#asterisk xochilpili (~xochilpil@unaffiliated/xochilpili)
13:29.53*** join/#asterisk xochilpili (~xochilpil@unaffiliated/xochilpili)
13:30.04xochilpilii have use this spa config: https://wiki.freepbx.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=55476525
13:30.08xochilpiliim not using freepbx, but still...
13:30.13xochilpilii did not receive the incomming calls or outgoing calls from asterisk, but when i do a outgoing call from my phone house, i got disconnected from PPPoE
13:32.07*** join/#asterisk skywayskase (~skywayska@163.182.162.226)
13:35.51*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
13:52.30*** join/#asterisk captain118 (uid167508@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-emyefxasgdpvhcds)
13:55.22*** join/#asterisk xochilpili (~xochilpil@unaffiliated/xochilpili)
13:56.31*** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-yevnssfyerubkdah)
13:56.31*** mode/#asterisk [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ
13:59.41*** join/#asterisk cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n)
13:59.41*** mode/#asterisk [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ
14:05.18*** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-aidqzznnrcmnunne)
14:05.18*** mode/#asterisk [+o kharwell] by ChanServ
14:16.55*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
14:24.43DovidWhat would cause this issue? The box has limited memory but it looks OK
14:24.44Dovid[2017-06-15 14:17:48] WARNING[17220]: res_musiconhold.c:644 spawn_mp3: Fork failed: Cannot allocate memory
14:24.44Dovid[2017-06-15 14:17:48] WARNING[17220]: res_musiconhold.c:703 monmp3thread: Unable to spawn mp3player
14:30.14[TK]D-FenderThat looks very "not OK" to me...
14:40.33tcpdumpI am running the asterisk vm - is there a way to rerun the firwall config wizard from the first login, if you happened to miss it?
14:40.34SamotCannot allocate memory <-- Generally means you is outta memory
14:40.53SamotWhat firewall config?
14:41.01SamotAsterisk doesn't have a firewall.
14:41.29SamotLinux has iptables.
14:41.35cresl1ntcpdump: usually the operating system has a firewall builtin
14:41.58cresl1nIt's a separate layer from Asterisk
14:42.01tcpdumpcresl1n: so do you recommend using the os firewall and not using the responsive firewall included with the vm?
14:42.01SamotPeople use iptables for their firewall.
14:42.13cresl1ntcpdump: I always use iptables
14:42.13Samottcpdump: What OS?
14:42.27cresl1ntcpdump: I don't know what responsive firewall you're referring to
14:42.30tcpdumpSamot: the Astrisk offical VM
14:42.39SamotThere is not Asterisk Official VM
14:42.43SamotWhat are you talking about?
14:42.53cresl1ntcpdump: links or it didn't happen :-P
14:42.56tcpdumphttp://www.asterisk.org/downloads/asterisknow
14:42.58*** join/#asterisk niko1990 (~sascha@p5B33E0E9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
14:42.59SamotOK
14:43.02*** part/#asterisk niko1990 (~sascha@p5B33E0E9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
14:43.09SamotThat is a GUI distro.
14:43.10cresl1ntcpdump: ahhhhhhhhhh
14:43.20SamotWhich is maintained by FreePBX now I believe.
14:43.24SamotSince it IS FreePBX
14:43.32*** join/#asterisk niko1990 (~sascha@p5B33E0E9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
14:43.37tcpdumpyea, looks like it has freepbx built on other things.
14:43.41niko1990Hello everyone =
14:43.43niko1990=)
14:43.52Samottcpdump: AsteriskNOW = FreePBX
14:43.59SamotMaintained by the same people.
14:44.00SamotSame ISO
14:44.07SamotDifferent branding
14:44.19tcpdumpAh, i see Samot .
14:44.26SamotIt's kind of a legacy thing now.
14:44.50SamotAnd since it is a GUI
14:44.58SamotIt's not really supported here.
14:45.13SamotBecause FreePBX *owns* the box.
14:45.22SamotPreconfigured dialplan generation..
14:45.36Samotconfiguration files are structured differently
14:45.41SamotModified differently..
14:46.09TandyUKhey guys, looking for an ATA type device i think....  We installed Draytek 2860 Voip routers on our sites, btu these dont behave how the customer wants
14:46.20SamotAsterisk is like making a meal from scratch.
14:46.28SamotFreePBX is Stouffers.
14:46.29TandyUKthese allow the router to regster a sip account, and connect 2 analog phones to the router
14:46.31SamotAlready made
14:46.33SamotAlready to go
14:46.41SamotPop seal and use.
14:46.47TandyUKincoming voip call goes to analog phone,   incoming PSTN call goes to anaog phone
14:46.55TandyUKbehind these routers we have a bunch of IP phones
14:47.10TandyUKI need a way to take the customers incoming PSTN line, and present this to the sip phones
14:47.18SamotYeah..
14:47.20SamotYou need a PBX
14:47.28SamotBecause the Draytek 2860 is not that
14:47.36TandyUKi had assumed we just log the sip phone onto the router, and it acts as sip proxy for the sip accounts, and like an ata for the analog
14:47.52SamotNo
14:47.53TandyUKso eg, if internet goes down, and you dial out using the ip phone, this falls back to using the pstn
14:48.01SamotThe Draytek is an FXS device.
14:48.02TandyUKyeah im only finding this out now
14:48.04SamotNot an FXO device.
14:48.12SamotThe documents are pretty clear.
14:48.20tcpdumpSamot: that makes sense.  i think FreePBX is my best bet til I learn this.   Even if I dont use it as originally stated this AM, I still want to understand how it works.
14:48.27TandyUKtheyre clear as mud tbf, even their knowledgebase doesnt make it very clear
14:48.56TandyUKim on the ohone with their tech support atm, who also seem pretty unaware that how I thought it worked is not how it actually works
14:49.01SamotTandyUK: It's a router with an ATA
14:49.08SamotA FXS ATA
14:49.12SamotTwo FXS ports
14:49.15SamotThat's pretty clear.
14:49.22TandyUKyes, but it must have some FXO support, as it takes ana alalog phone line in
14:49.41cresl1nno
14:49.43TandyUKeg, it adds cal lwaiting support for the analog phones
14:49.47cresl1noh
14:50.01TandyUKif im on a voip call, and the analog line rings, it call-waits it for me
14:50.03SamotTwo 'FXS' Phone Ports
14:50.12TandyUKit cant do that if nits not able to pick up the incoming call and handle it
14:50.30SamotIt's an ATA
14:50.37SamotWith some vertical features
14:50.40TandyUKSamot: i get the 2 fxs ports for analog phones
14:50.42SamotIt does not do FXO
14:50.48SamotFXS is for phones.
14:50.54TandyUKwhat exactly is the PSTN line port connected to then?
14:51.03TandyUKthats FXO not FXS
14:51.04SamotIt DOESN'T
14:51.26SamotThe Draytek would connect to a PBX or VoIP server..
14:51.26TandyUKin the front of the router there are 2/3 ports.
14:51.30TandyUK1 PSTN LINE port
14:51.46TandyUK1 Phones port (with a rj11 to 2x bt adaptor) for the 2 analog phones
14:51.59niko1990I'm nearly brand new to asterisk. I have a question: I'm developing right now my own doorCom (Raspberry Pi). What I need: Asterisk running in the background as a service, asterisk should be connected as a sip extension on my fritzbox, and I need asterisk to place calls over the command line (bash scripts - something like "asterisk dial NUMBER"). Is this possible? (Later on i would like to use some more functions of asterisk (that i already
14:52.07SamotOK
14:52.19TandyUKand completely seperate to that, is the ADSL/VDSL rj11 port for wan
14:52.38Samotso you need to connect it ot a PBX
14:52.47Samotwith a SIP account.
14:52.55SamotLike I said, it's in the docs.
14:52.56SamotI missed it
14:52.59SamotNow I see it
14:53.02TandyUKit is connected to a pbx, we have 2 sip accounts logged in on the router
14:53.16TandyUKthese can ring either of the analog phones
14:53.22TandyUKbut not an IP phone behind it
14:53.24SamotWhere are the SIP phones connected to?
14:53.42TandyUKtheyre plugged into the LAN ports, as for the sip registration, thats where im stuck
14:53.47SamotRight
14:53.55SamotThere needs to be a PBX for THOSE phones
14:54.02TandyUKi would expect the sip phones to register with the router
14:54.06SamotThen the FXO connects to THAT PBX
14:54.10SamotNo.
14:54.10[TK]D-FenderTandyUK> but not an IP phone behind it <- BECAUSE IT ISN'T ACTING LIKE A pbx
14:54.13TandyUKso when a PSTN call comes in, it forwards to the IP phones
14:54.35TandyUKexactly, so back to what i first asked:
14:54.36[TK]D-FenderTandyUK, the line port there is DUMB.  Very little logic in its processing
14:54.43[TK]D-Fenderit switches the LOCAL ports only
14:54.46TandyUK15:46] <TandyUK> hey guys, looking for an ATA type device i think....
14:54.48SamotThis then gives the telephones access to your analogue line to allow you to make calls as well as your VoIP facility (you can select the PSTN line instead of VoIP by dialling #0)
14:54.57[TK]D-FenderTandyUK, that IS an ATA
14:55.10[TK]D-FenderTandyUK, it is NOT an FXO-> SIp gateway
14:55.27TandyUKok, so an FXO>SIP gateway is what i need then
14:55.31[TK]D-Fendertha has a DUMB SWITCH between the PSTN port & the attached phones
14:55.57[TK]D-Fender"
14:55.57[TK]D-FenderAutomatic phone switch-over for incoming calls on either PSTN or VoIP"
14:56.00[TK]D-Fenderhttp://www.draytek.co.uk/products/business/vigor-2860#voip
14:56.01SamotWhere are the local IP phones going to REGISTER?
14:56.15TandyUKSamot: with the gateway
14:56.28SamotSo you need a gateway that supports multiple SIP accounts
14:56.32TandyUKwhich according to its dialplan will then direct calls either over an upstream sip account, or out over PSTN
14:56.55TandyUKright, so what hardware exists that can do that?
14:57.03SamotWell..
14:57.16SamotNormal people would get a FXO to SIP device and register it to a PBX
14:57.21SamotThen register the phones to the PBX
14:57.28SamotSince the FXO is the PSTN gateway
14:57.32TandyUKyeah problem here is the customers PBX is in office #1
14:57.48TandyUKin office #3, they have sip phones which register ove vpn to that pbx, plus analog phone lines
14:58.06[TK]D-FenderAnd the problem is ...?
14:58.07SamotDid you give them this solution?
14:58.10TandyUKthe point of this is if internet goes down, sip phones can still make/recieve calls fro mthe analog line
14:58.18TandyUKno internet == no vpn == no sip server
14:58.29TandyUKno i didnt lol
14:58.32[TK]D-Fenderthose phone will have to have the BRAINS to use the local device
14:58.33[TK]D-Fender^
14:58.42[TK]D-FenderThey need to be configured to fail over
14:58.56SamotSo what are you trying to do then?
14:58.58[TK]D-FenderAnd the device there needs enough brains to accept & process those calls
14:59.12TandyUKSamot: eset this up
14:59.13[TK]D-Fenderthis is the point where you start putting PBX's at EACH location
14:59.31TandyUKtheyve asked me to replace their existing siemens phones (which have sip AND pstn ports
14:59.40TandyUKwith modern sip phones (which dont have the pstn part)
15:00.25SamotSo they want POTS at each location for backup?
15:00.27TandyUKsiemens n300ip i think it is, discontinued, phones are badly wearing out, they just want a modern replacement for 10 year old phones
15:00.32TandyUKexactly
15:00.42Samot10:59:24 AM <[TK]D-Fender> this is the point where you start putting PBX's at EACH location
15:01.00TandyUKso there are NO phones on the market now with these features?
15:01.18[TK]D-Fender<TandyUK> siemens n300ip i think it is, discontinued, phones are badly wearing out, they just want a modern replacement for 10 year old phones <- those ancient ideas of putting analog lines directly in the phones and that kind of fail-over is DEAD
15:01.19SamotWell you can get an FXO gateway for each location..
15:01.19lvlinuxGigaset cordless...lol
15:01.24[TK]D-FenderModern things don't think that way
15:01.31[TK]D-Fenderyou have to plan for something else
15:01.36TandyUKn300 is the wrong number, thats completely different
15:01.36SamotThe phones have to be smart enough to failover to it
15:01.57SamotAnd then that gateway has to support a SIP account for EACH phone.
15:02.28SamotBut then they have no voicemail
15:02.30SamotNo IVR
15:02.33SamotNo anything
15:02.41SamotThey have a dumb gateway that sends calls out
15:02.45Samotand takes calls in.
15:03.03SamotTheir entire call flow structure is gone.
15:03.47SamotIf there *needs* to be a central PBX
15:03.53SamotAnd they want failover..
15:04.14SamotGet a second DSL line and have the Drayteks do WAN failover.
15:08.01SamotIf it's your job to replace their entire voice system at all their locations...
15:08.21SamotLook at what they want and what the best options to provide that solution are.
15:08.58TandyUKIm looking at gigaset N300 IP atm, whihc seems to replicate exactly what they want
15:09.11TandyUK4 dect handsets, 4 sip accounts, plus PSTN
15:09.52SamotHow many phones are at each location?
15:10.44SamotAnd are these desk phones?
15:10.51SamotThat they currently have?
15:12.58TandyUK2-3 handsets per location
15:13.04TandyUKall dect portables
15:13.17TandyUKId ordered yealink W52's to replace them with
15:13.27TandyUKbut then oviously hit the lack of pstn snag
15:13.29*** join/#asterisk Kunsi (felix@unaffiliated/kunsi)
15:13.46TandyUKthey have this setup on 7 different sites
15:14.11TandyUKfortunately we were only doing 2 sites to begin with!
15:15.01SamotBut they have a central PBX?
15:15.55TandyUKat their head office, yes
15:16.13TandyUKeach site has several sip extensions, with PSTN fallback
15:16.28TandyUKthese numbers are published too, so most incoming calls come over the pstn
15:16.33TandyUKits only internal stuff that uses sip
15:16.33SamotSo..
15:17.04SamotYou're going to register each extension with the PBX as a "SIP provider" on this DECT system..
15:17.16SamotAnd then each phone registers to the DECT system..
15:17.19TandyUKok stop, lets start again
15:17.29TandyUKhead office: PBX with outgoing trunks
15:17.46TandyUKshop #1:  SIP Extensions 201, 202, 203  (and 200 is a hunt group for the shop)
15:17.50[TK]D-Fenderso far your incoming processing seems to have no brain
15:17.59TandyUKshop #1 PSTN: 01903123456
15:18.08TandyUKincoming PSTN calls ring to all 3 handsets at that sho
15:18.15TandyUKthere is no logic to it, I agree
15:18.29TandyUKIve been trying to sell this customer a hosted pbx for years withotu any sucess
15:18.32[TK]D-FenderAnd hopefully it'
15:18.35SamotOK
15:18.37TandyUKtheyre too fixed in the analog world
15:18.43[TK]D-FenderAnd hopefully it's smart enough in ringing those DECT devices attached
15:18.48SamotSo how does Shop #1 call Shop #2?
15:18.54TandyUKyes, the gigaset N300 IP does this
15:18.55[TK]D-FenderThis plan is low-featured crap
15:19.04SamotSo how does Shop #1 call Shop #2?
15:19.08[TK]D-Fenderno voicemail.  No IVR, not corporate messaging, nothing
15:19.12TandyUKinternally, on ext 301
15:19.16SamotOK
15:19.17TandyUKno ntohing whatsoever
15:19.20SamotSo stop.
15:19.22[TK]D-FenderThis makes it look like a Mickey Mouse operation
15:19.37SamotHow does the DECT connect to the central PBX
15:19.42[TK]D-FenderActually.... Disney HAS a huge phone system
15:19.47TandyUKSIP registartion via their internal VPN
15:19.48SamotSo it can route that call from 301 to201?
15:19.57SamotSo like I said..
15:19.58[TK]D-FenderSome cheap Chinese Mickey Mouse rip-off operation :p
15:20.07TandyUKall the sip logins go over their vpn, and is purely for internal stuff
15:20.10SamotThe DECT needs a "SIP provider" account for each extensions
15:20.15SamotThat needs to route back to the handset.
15:20.35TandyUKyes it has lol
15:20.43TandyUKim not sure whats unclear here tbh
15:20.49SamotI understand that
15:20.52TandyUKcentral PBX has 1 sip extension per dect handset
15:21.01SamotHANDSET
15:21.14SamotBut the DECT base is IN BETWEEN
15:21.20TandyUKyes, so the eg, N300ip base station registeres with 3 sip accounts, 1 per handset
15:21.23SamotThe handset does not register with the PBX
15:21.26TandyUKcorrect
15:21.28SamotIt registers with the n300
15:21.34SamotSo the n300 needs to register with the PBX
15:21.42TandyUKlike i just said lol
15:21.44SamotVia it's "SIP Provider" accounts.
15:21.55SamotThat you have to map back to the DECT devices
15:22.11SamotAnd hope your DECT base understands when the RG is hitting it
15:22.11TandyUKis waitign to see a point to this convo tbh
15:22.17*** join/#asterisk Kunsi (franzi@unaffiliated/kunsi)
15:22.28TandyUKthe ring group, eg "200" just rings 201,202,203 in unison
15:22.51TandyUKtheres nothing for  the base station to understand
15:22.58TandyUKit jus thas 3 calls coming in over sip
15:23.07SamotExcept for it's ring time
15:23.13SamotHow it handles CW
15:23.17SamotVM
15:23.23TandyUKthere IS NO VM
15:23.28TandyUKthere IS NO CW
15:23.29SamotOK.
15:23.53TandyUKtheres not even a "fuck off we're shut" message out of hours
15:23.59[TK]D-FenderIn this wonderful modern age this solution sounds like shit.  But they are entirely welcome to it...
15:24.12[TK]D-FenderHave fun...
15:27.04*** part/#asterisk niko1990 (~sascha@p5B33E0E9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
15:28.42Samot11:18:48 AM <TandyUK> theyre too fixed in the analog world << That's crap. I convert hotels from analog to IP all the time.
15:29.10SamotThey are AMAZED at what can be done on IP vs analog that IMPROVES their business.
15:29.41SamotThey where "fixed" in the analog world for the past 25+ years.
15:30.13SamotJust did an auto shop
15:30.26SamotAgain, they are amazed at what they can do now.
15:31.02SamotThey can actually reach mechanics out on the other side of the yard because of softphones
15:32.11SamotOr transfer calls to the two trunk drivers without worrying about cell phone voicemails, etc.
15:32.14Samottow
15:32.26*** join/#asterisk malcolmd (malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd)
15:32.26*** mode/#asterisk [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ
15:33.33*** join/#asterisk samwierema (~samwierem@095-097-255-066.static.chello.nl)
15:33.34lvlinuxtow trunks? Is that a SIP in SIP tunnel? lol
15:33.54SamotBria.
15:34.16samwieremaHow do I confirm that a module for Asterisk is available? If the status is "Running" and the module is loaded?
15:34.30SamotRunning means it's running
15:34.33Samottherefore loaded
15:34.41lvlinuxand therefore "available"
15:35.04tcpdumpOne more odd question - since asterisk doesnt support RTSP, but rather video of RTP, does the SIP channel handle all of the QoS things that RTSP would normally handle?
15:35.20lvlinuxYou mean RTCP?
15:36.39SamotIs this over the Internet?
15:36.45*** join/#asterisk Hyper_Eye (~mwoodj@pdpc/sponsor/digium/hyper-eye)
15:36.58SamotIf it is, QoS is not guaranteed.
15:37.20samwieremaOk, so I couldn't resolve this yesterday: the res_statsd.so is running, but, when I call the StatsD dialplan application I get "No application 'StatsD' for extension". Is there anything needed beyond loading the module to use this application?
15:38.47*** join/#asterisk newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-bbzuglnbfilanatl)
15:38.47*** mode/#asterisk [+o newtonr] by ChanServ
15:45.56lvlinuxsamwierema: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Utilizing+the+StatsD+Dialplan+Application
15:47.03*** join/#asterisk dakudos (~dakudos@c-73-243-248-133.hsd1.co.comcast.net)
15:49.22*** join/#asterisk skywayskase (~skywayska@163.182.162.226)
16:16.58*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~luckman21@unaffiliated/luckman212)
16:20.27*** join/#asterisk salviadud (~ralfalfa@189-211-190-134.static.axtel.net)
16:31.44*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.171)
16:59.27*** join/#asterisk retentiveboy (~retentive@c-73-82-30-193.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
17:03.13*** join/#asterisk defsdoor (~andy@cpc120600-sutt6-2-0-cust177.19-1.cable.virginm.net)
17:12.34*** join/#asterisk retentiveboy (~retentive@c-73-82-30-193.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
17:26.53*** join/#asterisk clarjon1 (~clarjon1@unaffiliated/clarjon1)
17:37.14*** join/#asterisk qakhan (~qakhan@50-204-254-11-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
17:40.18qakhanhi all,is there any way to setup asterisk failover?
17:45.38SamotIn what way?
17:45.47SamotI mean the answer is yes but it's not cut and dry.
17:46.21SamotAsterisk, itself, has no method for this.
17:46.28SamotSo you have to implement a method.
17:47.43qakhanis there any best prectice.
17:48.00SamotIt all depends on the method you want to do it in.
17:48.08SamotThere there is the best practice for that method.
17:48.34SamotAre you talking an HA failover with a floating IP, a heartbeat, etc?
17:48.54SamotOr are you talking having two servers and the phones use failover options to register to the backup
17:49.02qakhanmy main goal is if server-A goes down then Server-B take over
17:49.11SamotI get your goal.
17:49.18SamotBut there are various ways to do it
17:49.30SamotHow you want to do it is going to determine the steps you take.
17:49.53SamotHow will you monitor A and B?
17:50.05qakhanok, can you please share some examples
17:50.06SamotWill there be something to redirect the traffic?
17:50.10SamotI did
17:50.34Samot1:48:45 PM <Samot> Are you talking an HA failover with a floating IP, a heartbeat, etc?
17:50.34Samot1:49:04 PM <Samot> Or are you talking having two servers and the phones use failover options to register to the backup
17:51.22SamotThose are basically the two extreme sides of the spectrum.
17:51.37SamotFrom the advanced to the very basic.
17:51.44qakhanHA failover with a floating IP, a heartbeat, will be over the OS (Linux)
17:52.04*** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@80-109-194-26.cable.dynamic.surfer.at)
17:52.10SamotSo you have this already?
17:52.43qakhandoes asterisk replicate its config with other server?
17:52.57qakhanno i dont have HA yet
17:53.00SamotYou have to tell it to
17:53.06Samotrsync or something
17:54.15SamotAsterisk is just a service running on the server.
17:54.17SamotLike Apache
17:54.19SamotMySQL
17:54.54SamotHow you replicate the data from Server A to Server B and vice versa is dealers choice.
17:55.18qakhanok Thanks,
17:55.32*** join/#asterisk skywayskase (~skywayska@163.182.162.226)
17:55.49qakhanbut if servers swicthes current calls will be drop
17:56.00SamotYes.
17:56.15qakhancan we avoid it?
17:56.38SamotWell how is the other Asterisk server know there is a call there?
17:56.55SamotCan it be avoided? Yes.
17:57.16qakhanhow
17:57.22SamotDude.
17:57.28drmessanoNot using Asterisk
17:57.33Samot^^^
17:57.38SamotOne way
17:57.38drmessanoAsterisk is a B2BUA, not a SIP proxy
17:57.53SamotThere is going to be a lot of moving parts for this
17:58.08SamotA SIP Proxy/SBC is gong to be one of them.
17:58.37drmessanoIn which case, Asterisk wont be handling the call
17:58.58*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~luckman21@unaffiliated/luckman212)
17:58.58*** join/#asterisk skywayskase (~skywayska@163.182.162.226)
18:00.54SamotWell I said it's possible to avoid the call dropping
18:01.08SamotI didn't say it was going to be a seamless transition..
18:01.49lvlinuxqakhan: Kamailio is very commonly used for this, as a SIP server in front of Asterisk.
18:02.03SamotIt's not going to avoid the call dropping.
18:03.15SamotThere's going to be a delay in the failover..
18:03.19SamotJust accept it.
18:03.38SamotBut at least if PBX A craps itself, you have PBX B
18:09.08lvlinuxThe call won't drop if the RTP media is direct will it?
18:10.08SamotSignaling.
18:10.11SamotSo yes.
18:10.17*** join/#asterisk retentiveboy_ (~retentive@c-73-82-30-193.hsd1.ga.comcast.net)
18:10.22SamotNo signaling not way to send RTP
18:10.31Samots/not/no/
18:12.34*** join/#asterisk samwierema (~samwierem@82.169.225.211)
18:17.28*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
18:26.13lvlinuxI mean after RTP is already flowing between endpoints.
18:27.29*** join/#asterisk bl3nto (~bl3nto@cpe-109-60-12-46.st3.cable.xnet.hr)
18:27.52lvlinuxWouldn't the call continue at least until another SIP message was sent, like a re-invite or BYE etc.
18:27.57lvlinux?
18:29.48drmessanoHave you tried direct media on endpoints?
18:30.36drmessanoWorks great internally
18:30.42drmessanoDoesnt externally
18:31.42Samotlvlinux: My point is there would need to be a SBC between the endpoints and the Asterisk server.
18:31.56SamotIn which the endpoints know nothing about Asterisk.
18:32.10SamotAnd the SBC is sending calls to the needed Asterisk server for whatever reason..
18:33.45SamotAnd even if the floating IP sent the RTP over to PBX B, it doesn't have any active channels..
18:33.52SamotIt's not using the RTP ports at the moment...
18:34.02SamotHow is it going to know what to do with the audio?
18:34.43SamotWhat about that poor dude in the middle of the IVR tree
18:34.52SamotIs he going to be pushed back right into the same spot?
18:36.14drmessanoIf you want Box B in case Box A goes down, super easy to do
18:36.24drmessanoif you want "Calls never dropping", plan to spend money
18:36.32SamotA lot.
18:36.38drmessanoMost people dont need that level of redundancy
18:36.49drmessanoIf they do, theyre not on IRC looking for it
18:36.55SamotAnd just wave bye to your Asterisk servers..
18:37.08SamotBecause any solution isn't going to be needing them.
18:37.12SamotAt that level.
18:37.54SamotA call is not two endpoints aka phones.
18:38.03SamotA call is between an endpoint and Asterisk.
18:38.31SamotIf PBX A craps out..
18:38.57SamotHow are you going to move 5 users from a conf bridge over to PBX B on the fly without dropping anything?
18:39.53drmessanoDoesnt PJSIP do that with the never_drop_calls_when_HA option?
18:40.17SamotWell really..
18:40.24SamotAt this level it's not even about Asterisk..
18:40.32SamotIt's about logic of how things would be done.
18:40.44SamotLike I said, the guy in the middle of the IVR
18:40.58SamotWill the data he's already entered be known on the new PBX
18:41.03drmessanoThe context of the question was Asterisk
18:41.03SamotWill it know what spot he was in?
18:41.07drmessanoSo the short answer is
18:41.08drmessanoNo
18:41.08SamotOK
18:41.13SamotSo with Asterisk..
18:41.16SamotRight
18:41.20SamotSo calls are going to drop.
18:41.52SamotThe point of HA is that when A craps, 30 seconds later B can take over.
18:41.58SamotOr whatever  your timeframe is..
18:42.06SamotSo when they DO call back, you're getting the calls.
18:42.13*** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-179-40-170.cust.bezeqint.net)
18:42.20SamotInstead of forwarding them to cell phones because you're down.
18:43.26*** join/#asterisk showitmedia (026bd9dd@gateway/web/freenode/ip.2.107.217.221)
18:43.32SamotYou need to make a list
18:43.46SamotAnd break it down with "What I REALLY REALLY WANT"
18:44.02SamotAnd "What I Would Really Like"
18:44.13SamotAnd "What I Actually Need"
18:45.07SamotBecause this is something that people either A) Underbuild or B) Overkill build.
18:45.40showitmediaHi, I have a problem with phones dropping of an Asterisk 13 they keep changing state from unreachable to reachable and back in random order and constantly. My gues is some sort of session timeout or NAT issue, anyone have any Ideas?
18:45.52*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
18:45.54SamotAre they remote phones to the PBX?
18:46.11SamotLike over the Internet type connection?
18:46.20showitmediathe PBX is on the internet and the phones are on a local network
18:46.26SamotSo yes.
18:46.29SamotThen, NAT.
18:47.03showitmediaThat was my conclusion aswell, any Idea how to fix it?
18:47.20drmessanoWhat router are you using?
18:47.38showitmediaI have the same setup running in 2 locations one works fine the other one keeps doing this ping pong
18:47.42drmessanoWhat router are you using?
18:48.21showitmediathe location with issues have a Zyxel USG 100 between them and the internet
18:48.50drmessanoThat would do it
18:48.52showitmediaI have disabled the ALG SIP function as I know the Cisco equvalant can cause trouble
18:49.07drmessanoWhat do you have in front of the Asterisk box?
18:49.18showitmediaiptables
18:49.22showitmedia:-)
18:49.25SamotSo it's public Internet?
18:49.32showitmediayes
18:49.48SamotZyxel.
18:49.54drmessanoThe Zyxel is the problem
18:49.55SamotThose are the bad guys here.
18:50.05drmessanoDitch it
18:50.13drmessanoGet a Mikrotik for 1/10 the price
18:50.36showitmediathat was also my toughts. but I'm no Zyxel expert and I don't recognise the interface on the box.
18:50.38SamotShill.
18:50.47drmessanoRB750Gr3
18:50.48SamotBut seriously..
18:50.50drmessano^ $55
18:50.50SamotGet that.
18:51.25showitmediaThe system goes live after midnight, so you guys are my last resort.
18:51.35drmessanoWe just told you what to do
18:51.43drmessanoGet a Mikrotik for 1/10 the price
18:51.44drmessanoRB750Gr3
18:51.46drmessano^ $55
18:51.52drmessanoScrap the Zyxel
18:52.02showitmediaI've tried beating it but even creating a simple firwall rule on the box is hard work
18:52.18drmessanoIts literally the problem
18:52.24drmessanoCant help you any further
18:54.05showitmediawish I could scrap it. right now. Been trying to see if there was some sort of session timeout on the thing
19:02.11drmessanoIts a ZyXel
19:02.21drmessanoThey generally suck with SIP
19:02.37drmessanoNothing to fix
19:52.36salviadudI want to know how to solve the dependency on compiling asterisk with imap
19:52.47salviadudOn centos specifically
19:53.20salviadudI can't highlight the option when I do make menuselect
19:55.53salviadudWell, I just read I need some pakcages, forgetaboutit
19:57.01drmessanoInstall the needed packages and you wont need them
19:57.06drmessanoGood job
19:57.55*** join/#asterisk Jesterboxboy (~Thunderbi@80-109-194-26.cable.dynamic.surfer.at)
20:10.46*** join/#asterisk libardi (~libardi@179.159.11.133)
20:21.55*** join/#asterisk Samael28 (~Samael28@176.104.56.91)
21:08.47*** join/#asterisk stefanauss (~stefanaus@151.14.6.6)
21:21.57*** join/#asterisk mahlon (~mahlon@martini.nu)
21:30.20*** join/#asterisk newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-sodeyfemydjgsdje)
21:30.20*** mode/#asterisk [+o newtonr] by ChanServ
21:45.52*** join/#asterisk lankanmon (~LKNnet@2607:fea8:d1f:ffcb:adc6:1873:48cc:85ac)
21:52.11*** part/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-aidqzznnrcmnunne)
23:08.08*** join/#asterisk tuxd00d (~tuxd00d@ip68-106-11-138.ph.ph.cox.net)
23:11.07*** join/#asterisk evilman_work (~evilman@87.244.6.228)
23:12.59*** join/#asterisk joako (~joako@opensuse/member/joak0)
23:30.08*** join/#asterisk stefanauss (~stefanaus@151.14.6.6)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.