| 00:11.12 | *** join/#asterisk drathir (~kamiljk8@unaffiliated/drathir) |
| 00:11.56 | *** join/#asterisk superscrat (~asanders@173-17-133-2.client.mchsi.com) |
| 00:13.07 | *** join/#asterisk babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-tsjrrzvzcicllraz) |
| 00:13.57 | *** join/#asterisk qakhan (~qakhan@pool-74-96-206-46.washdc.fios.verizon.net) |
| 00:14.24 | qakhan | can we register same ext on 2 devices? |
| 00:15.43 | qakhan | i have 1 polycom and 1 ringer to increase the volume of incoming call |
| 00:17.06 | jeev | why not make it ring both devices at once |
| 00:18.06 | qakhan | how? |
| 00:21.31 | jeev | you have two devices, no? they can both register? |
| 00:24.28 | qakhan | i have 2 device, both got register but 2nd device (ringer) got priority and rings but phone does not ring or i cannot pickup the call on phone |
| 00:32.42 | superscrat | qakhan, it may be worth looking into shared line appearances (if you are trying to use 2 devices with 1 extension) |
| 00:35.16 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe1 (~CeBe@port-92-200-174-67.dynamic.qsc.de) |
| 00:40.07 | qakhan | superscrat thanks, |
| 00:40.34 | superscrat | qakhan, you're welcome. |
| 00:42.01 | qakhan | i was thinking if i create an other ext and group them both |
| 00:42.05 | qakhan | ext1 and ext2 |
| 00:42.13 | qakhan | it is possible |
| 00:43.15 | qakhan | ? |
| 00:44.16 | qakhan | ext3 = ext1 & ext2 |
| 00:45.42 | *** join/#asterisk ghostlines (~ghostline@i191002.upc-i.chello.nl) |
| 00:50.09 | superscrat | you could accomplish that in the dialplan I suppose |
| 01:05.17 | netvergent | I need to get my system to except inbound calls to a un advertised extention, pin pad to make calls at whole sale rates. |
| 01:05.29 | netvergent | trying to recall what I did to make this happen a few years ago |
| 01:06.40 | *** join/#asterisk c0ldg0ld_ (~c0ldg0ld@unaffiliated/c0ldg0ld) |
| 01:09.31 | *** join/#asterisk superscrat (~asanders@173-17-133-2.client.mchsi.com) |
| 01:11.27 | superscrat | netvergent, couldn't you just put your extension inside of a context that was unknown to anyone but you |
| 01:13.16 | *** join/#asterisk superscrat (~asanders@173-17-133-2.client.mchsi.com) |
| 01:17.16 | *** join/#asterisk Sudravirodhin (~Sudraviro@162.218.22.124) |
| 01:19.16 | netvergent | yes |
| 01:19.36 | netvergent | there is a feature in freepbx that enables inward dialing and outword calling. |
| 02:04.24 | *** join/#asterisk idafyaid (~idafyaid3@unaffiliated/idafyaid) |
| 02:21.41 | *** join/#asterisk idafyaid (~idafyaid3@unaffiliated/idafyaid) |
| 02:26.17 | *** join/#asterisk svm_invictvs (~patricktw@unaffiliated/svminvictvs/x-938456) |
| 02:41.52 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe1 (~CeBe@port-92-200-30-250.dynamic.qsc.de) |
| 02:42.15 | *** join/#asterisk envolution (~evo@105.ip-192-99-247.net) |
| 02:45.33 | envolution | I'm struggling a bit with determining the source of bruteforce account attacks. Trouble is nf_conntrack at the router is correctly mangling the sip packets source, since my asterisk server is natted on a local LAN. Each failed auth basically shows my external IP as source, and internal IP as destination. Wondering if anyone has suggestions on a fail2ban type workflow or just a way of discerning the correct source |
| 02:46.28 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@77-172-82-111.ip.telfort.nl) |
| 02:47.43 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 02:50.15 | *** join/#asterisk almostworking (~almostwor@unaffiliated/almostworking) |
| 02:51.04 | *** join/#asterisk idafyaid (~idafyaid3@unaffiliated/idafyaid) |
| 02:51.22 | *** part/#asterisk almostworking (~almostwor@unaffiliated/almostworking) |
| 03:17.55 | *** join/#asterisk [d__d] (~d__d]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 03:18.47 | *** join/#asterisk drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 03:24.32 | [TK]D-Fender | kill the conntrack |
| 03:31.57 | envolution | isn't conntrack what is keeping the sip connections healthy TK? |
| 03:32.05 | [TK]D-Fender | no |
| 03:32.24 | [TK]D-Fender | Anything you shove inbetween is only going to screw stuff up |
| 03:42.03 | *** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@123203240102.ctinets.com) |
| 03:52.43 | *** join/#asterisk vader- (~Adium@pool-173-49-160-70.phlapa.fios.verizon.net) |
| 04:03.22 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-218-28-58.cablep.bezeqint.net) |
| 04:20.38 | *** join/#asterisk svm_invictvs (~patricktw@unaffiliated/svminvictvs/x-938456) |
| 04:23.58 | *** join/#asterisk nephfl (6b9005ae@gateway/web/freenode/ip.107.144.5.174) |
| 04:24.19 | nephfl | hello |
| 04:26.16 | nephfl | I'm trying to select switch hardware and can't really find the objective information that I would like... was thinking maybe I could get some suggestions here |
| 04:35.35 | [TK]D-Fender | You should probably start with what you're looking for... |
| 04:51.42 | nephfl | I am trying to decide on what type of switch to recommend for a project. Right now, they have an amazing number of small workgroup switches and of course, they are having trouble with voip and everything else. It is a mess, I have them limping. I need to recommend a complete new plan. |
| 04:53.40 | nephfl | At first, I thought Cisco, because nobody usually complains if you recommend cisco...but I'm afraid they will be cheap on labor... so, I was thinking something more like dell...but I need to decide what to offer... I was thinking 3 switches that are layer 3 or 2+ 48 ports with optical sfp+ ports for uplink |
| 04:54.24 | nephfl | It will have to have functioning QoS for voip... and I was thinking PoE wouldn't be a bad idea either... |
| 04:55.02 | nephfl | I've dealth with Dell switches and haven't had trouble...I've also had catalyst switches...and done procure switches |
| 04:55.48 | nephfl | I want to do optical because there is lots of noise and distance between the main areas...and I think they really like the idea of optical as well |
| 04:56.48 | nephfl | i have really been busy and unavailable during the day to try to get a dell person to make a recommendation and really, the usually know much less than I do |
| 04:57.39 | nephfl | Under the hood, their various models do represent various acquired popular brands. I was thinking of dell hardware because I've had good experience with their next day replacement services |
| 04:58.44 | nephfl | I've run 100+ extensions on mixed dell switch networks with no trouble...but I would like to have had layer 3 when the domain controller went down once and the switches were pretty swamped... |
| 04:58.59 | nephfl | in this case, we are talking less than 50 extensions |
| 04:59.05 | nephfl | but something like 100 drops |
| 04:59.36 | nephfl | many areas have industrial machinery or even electroplating rectifiers that create quite a bit of noise |
| 05:00.22 | nephfl | and really, I've really just not developed an opinion of what is "best", just worked with whatever I've had or the vendor specified |
| 05:01.15 | nephfl | I was also thinking of dell servers for the hardware to run freepbx/asterisk on... again, because I have had good luck doing it in the past and because of their warranty service |
| 05:02.25 | nephfl | I have never even run a sfp/optical cable. I've always had an electrician/cabling company do that and just came in to do the setup and tie in...but I have an option here to do the whole thing |
| 05:03.38 | nephfl | Anyway, I thought hearing from you guys would really help as you are all of stronger opinions on hardware than I am |
| 05:05.10 | nephfl | anybody hate dell switches? think I just need to go with juniper? |
| 05:06.25 | nephfl | Also, I need to make a recommendation to the company for an ongoing support contract with someone on a vendor level... |
| 05:07.00 | nephfl | I have paid for support hours with what was schmooze...and I have bought tons of hardware from digium |
| 05:08.56 | [TK]D-Fender | You've described a very petty office....with no need for SFP+ or huge switches. |
| 05:09.16 | [TK]D-Fender | nothing you can't do on 2 budget PoE switchs for your phones |
| 05:09.51 | [TK]D-Fender | Remember the puny bandwidth of VoIP..... |
| 05:10.40 | nephfl | very true, but this company is moving from being a literal petty office to something different... they have changed management... they are a production plant and the locations are separated by a fair distance and , as I said, span noisy areas... They will be going from no network, to exchange, AD, etc...and they will be moving all of their data (CAD, etc, to a more central location)... |
| 05:11.20 | nephfl | my reasoning for layer 3 was to be able to isolate traffic by department and they tend to have more options for putting in management interfaces and replicating traffic etc for troubleshooting |
| 05:12.04 | nephfl | That way, I can replicate ports to something like voipmonitor for analysis and to do IDS, etc |
| 05:12.04 | drmessano | A single Layer 3 at the core, maybe.. but the edge switches don't need to be L3 |
| 05:12.12 | nephfl | makes sense |
| 05:12.44 | *** join/#asterisk vader- (~Adium@pool-173-49-160-70.phlapa.fios.verizon.net) |
| 05:13.07 | nephfl | and has everyone pretty much sorted voip QoS.... I mean it really isn't a comparison but on the network they are on now...someone looped back a patch cable and killed the entire plant for several days (until they called me) |
| 05:13.34 | drmessano | Dont use Dell, dont use Cisco Small Business switches. We use tons of Cisco 3750s, 2960s, 2950s... New, can be expensive, but if you get refurb with contracts on them, they're a good value |
| 05:13.51 | nephfl | having a switch that will detect that type condition or at least fail safe rather than permissive would be nice |
| 05:14.15 | drmessano | With IOS you can configure all of that.. |
| 05:14.29 | drmessano | Hell, most managed switches can do something that basic |
| 05:14.37 | drmessano | Like keep a looped cable from killing it |
| 05:14.37 | nephfl | I'd like to give them a good quote on new hardware...and basically tell them take my options or get the other guy...I don't really want to dick around with these people |
| 05:15.22 | drmessano | Quote them a 3750G with as many ports as you need in a core, then a bunch of 2960s with PoE. Done |
| 05:19.21 | nephfl | so, you think the 3750 for servers and switches then the 2960s remote... but all copper? |
| 05:20.48 | drmessano | Yep, get the gigabit versions, obviously |
| 05:21.00 | drmessano | How many users? |
| 05:22.19 | nephfl | fairly few, they mostly have lots of devices...they are <50 usually at computers. ... very small engineering team... small customer service dept... then admin... |
| 05:22.40 | drmessano | So why "but all copper"? |
| 05:22.46 | drmessano | I still dont see the volume here |
| 05:22.55 | nephfl | but I was thinking lots of ports is a good idea so they dont get back in that silly switches everywhere thing... |
| 05:23.19 | nephfl | I found several in ceilings and very strange places... |
| 05:24.03 | drmessano | 2960Gs with 48 ports are cheap.. Max them out on ports. Place the edge switches in strategic places, and over buy |
| 05:25.16 | drmessano | Set up the network so only endpoints can connect to the switch ports, sans the core. Then they CANT plug in silly workgroup switches |
| 05:25.34 | nephfl | makes sense |
| 05:28.43 | nephfl | last I spoke with Cisco support, they were very helpful (with paid contract)...but they certainly didn't seem end user level friendly... is that still the type support they offer? |
| 05:33.48 | drmessano | They expect you to understand how to configure a switch. |
| 05:33.58 | drmessano | and will lead you to water, but not help you drink it |
| 05:34.16 | drmessano | Unless your google foo is terrible, you can find most things online |
| 05:35.12 | nephfl | lol, I don't have a problem with that... but they may be looking for less expensive support options than me or a cisco guy |
| 05:35.29 | nephfl | that is why i was leaning toward something like dell |
| 05:38.30 | nephfl | do you have a suggestion for the firewall/router/etc |
| 05:39.14 | nephfl | I used the pix for small offices a million years ago and have had one of the asa's but it was annoying because it was pretty crippled |
| 05:40.13 | drmessano | This is where I would go the geek route and get a Miktotik or an Edgerouter. An ASA may be more consistent with the build out though |
| 05:45.18 | *** join/#asterisk tparcina (~tomo@212.92.200.41) |
| 05:47.34 | drmessano | I guess this goes back to support level.. Im not a CCNA. Im more of a CCGP, and finding "Why does my SIP not work on an ASA blah" is better than "Why doesnt my SIP work on a Cisco 871" etc |
| 05:49.58 | nephfl | I'm looking at the ASAs, last time I just bought minimum because the specs looked like it would do the basic work but I ran into a routing limitation (something like it doesnt) |
| 05:51.50 | drmessano | I havent played a lot with the ASA's. I own one I deploy once a year for an event we do at a Childrens Hospital, but all of our routing is 2800 series enterprise stuff |
| 05:52.39 | nephfl | I think I wanted to set up multiple routing policies for seperate target inside interfaces over the different outside connections...so that I could fail over to the second connection to test it without switching the device's default outbound connection over |
| 05:53.38 | nephfl | and cisco said that you couldn't do policy based routing like that in that model...it basically only allowed 1 egress at a time |
| 05:54.44 | nephfl | and i could see that capability as very handy...not only for testing for failover but also to use the secondary link for traffic you don't want clogging the main connection |
| 05:54.52 | drmessano | I seem to remember the same limitation on the 871s? I think they were |
| 05:57.56 | nephfl | lan lite lan base ip lite? lol...they really want to maximize tiers for software options |
| 05:59.22 | *** join/#asterisk areski (~areski@80.174.128.121.dyn.user.ono.com) |
| 06:07.46 | *** join/#asterisk wdoekes (~walter@wjd.osso.nl) |
| 06:09.34 | drmessano | nephfl, no kidding |
| 06:10.19 | drmessano | nephfl, we get them maxed out.. but we have some crazy licensing |
| 06:10.54 | drmessano | My ASA has pretty much every option and maxed out user licenses.. We got it for like $600. I know that's not retail :) |
| 06:11.41 | nephfl | it is really annoying to try to put together pricing ... guess that is how it is designed, so that if you invest the time in learning the intricacies, then you will charge more and do a better job....i guess |
| 06:16.18 | *** join/#asterisk exuberocity (~exuberoci@cpe-174-101-32-221.columbus.res.rr.com) |
| 06:18.41 | *** join/#asterisk bulkorok (~Benjamin_@217.110.197.225) |
| 06:20.30 | *** join/#asterisk zapata (~zapata@2001:470:1f0b:11bc:cc48:2cba:c2c4:76af) |
| 06:22.30 | *** join/#asterisk jab416171 (~jab416171@c-76-27-96-12.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 06:24.49 | *** join/#asterisk D-Boy (~D-Boy@unaffiliated/cain) |
| 06:42.55 | *** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 06:45.12 | *** join/#asterisk ghostlines (~ghostline@i191002.upc-i.chello.nl) |
| 06:51.51 | *** join/#asterisk SaintMoriarty (~SaintMori@207.38.65.18) |
| 06:51.53 | SaintMoriarty | hello |
| 06:52.32 | SaintMoriarty | I wanted to see if anyone can help me with a AMI action that would dial a outbound number and connect it to a extension |
| 07:13.27 | *** join/#asterisk puzzled (~patrick@puzzled.xs4all.nl) |
| 07:14.31 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:19.23 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 07:29.04 | *** join/#asterisk ghostlines (~ghostline@i191002.upc-i.chello.nl) |
| 07:31.15 | *** join/#asterisk ldc (~lorenzo@dyn115-144.pool224-104.ams.nl.inet.interstella.net) |
| 07:44.16 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic_ (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 07:47.08 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 07:51.03 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 07:55.29 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@78.24.104.73) |
| 08:12.14 | *** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/chainsaw) |
| 08:24.43 | *** join/#asterisk elitas (~elitas@213.226.135.203) |
| 08:34.40 | *** join/#asterisk pchero_work (~pchero@109.70.54.56) |
| 08:57.00 | *** join/#asterisk areski (~areski@221.Red-88-5-47.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 09:09.55 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 09:10.07 | *** join/#asterisk CustosLimen (~CustosLim@unaffiliated/cust0slim3n) |
| 09:19.43 | *** join/#asterisk wanna (~wanna@194.183.244.5) |
| 09:23.22 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic_ (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 09:26.40 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 09:45.16 | *** join/#asterisk _0x5eb_ (~seb@seb-hpws2.w1.tele.crt1.net) |
| 09:50.57 | *** join/#asterisk _0x5eb_ (~seb@seb-hpws2.elen.ucl.ac.be) |
| 09:52.51 | *** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@109.188.126.22) |
| 09:52.53 | *** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@109.188.126.22) |
| 09:59.24 | *** join/#asterisk MadHatter42 (~MadHatter@unaffiliated/madhatter42) |
| 10:05.52 | *** join/#asterisk ghostlines (~ghostline@82.201.93.50) |
| 10:06.36 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 10:24.33 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic_ (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 10:49.32 | *** join/#asterisk Tim_Toady (~fuzzy@snf-33276.vm.okeanos.grnet.gr) |
| 11:13.02 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 11:22.43 | *** join/#asterisk happy-dude (uid62780@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ppwkztgnynfdbfzs) |
| 11:29.21 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe (~CeBe@port-92-200-30-250.dynamic.qsc.de) |
| 11:46.14 | *** join/#asterisk robl^ (~robl@pdpc/supporter/active/robl) |
| 11:46.50 | *** join/#asterisk idafyaid (~idafyaid3@unaffiliated/idafyaid) |
| 11:50.31 | *** join/#asterisk italorossi (~Adium@187.60.66.11) |
| 11:54.26 | *** join/#asterisk Deeewayne (~Deeewayne@c-68-42-41-245.hsd1.al.comcast.net) |
| 11:54.26 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 11:55.02 | *** join/#asterisk jrose_atDigium (jrose_atDi@nat/digium/x-dtuhtsagxfzvrgpq) |
| 11:57.20 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 11:59.35 | *** join/#asterisk fstd (~fstd@unaffiliated/fisted) |
| 12:02.50 | *** join/#asterisk madduck (~madduck@debian/developer/madduck) |
| 12:03.19 | madduck | does asterisk allow me to service two separate offices à la virtual hosting, from one asterisk instance? |
| 12:04.17 | WIMPy | You can speretae your dialplan ans much (or as little) as you like. |
| 12:05.59 | *** join/#asterisk marceloamorim (~marcelo@189-90-192-72.isimples.com.br) |
| 12:06.16 | madduck | but all in one file, eh? I was kinda hoping to have e.g. a separate dialplan/sip/iax conf for each site⦠|
| 12:06.32 | madduck | separate voicemail spaces are possible, i know that |
| 12:06.41 | WIMPy | You can also make as many files as you like and #include them. |
| 12:07.23 | madduck | ok, i will read up on this |
| 12:07.26 | madduck | thanks for the pointer |
| 12:08.00 | WIMPy | You can even "#include dir/*". |
| 12:12.38 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216-191-106-163.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 12:26.02 | *** join/#asterisk dtcrshr (~datacrush@unaffiliated/datacrusher) |
| 12:32.37 | *** join/#asterisk jetlag (~jetlag@pool-71-168-199-224.cmdnnj.east.verizon.net) |
| 12:40.46 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic_ (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 12:58.36 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it) |
| 13:00.09 | *** join/#asterisk aross42 (~aross@dsl-eclipsefnd.storm.ca) |
| 13:00.55 | *** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@209.141.122.71) |
| 13:02.21 | *** join/#asterisk gunhu (~alexis@mail.sisteer.com) |
| 13:02.23 | gunhu | Hi |
| 13:11.34 | *** join/#asterisk brad_mssw (~brad@66.129.88.50) |
| 13:16.56 | *** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@host37-245-static.119-2-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 13:17.09 | *** join/#asterisk marceloamorim (~marcelo@189-90-192-72.isimples.com.br) |
| 13:28.33 | *** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@77-172-82-111.ip.telfort.nl) |
| 13:40.05 | *** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@78.24.104.73) |
| 13:47.00 | *** join/#asterisk bmurt (~brendan@8.39.115.8) |
| 13:56.00 | *** join/#asterisk wonderworld (~ww@ip-176-199-166-61.hsi06.unitymediagroup.de) |
| 14:04.34 | *** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-uozjqojnxuphletd) |
| 14:05.20 | wanda_ | ho |
| 14:07.20 | *** join/#asterisk CustosLimen (~CustosLim@unaffiliated/cust0slim3n) |
| 14:07.37 | *** join/#asterisk davlefouAMD (~davlefouA@197.15.214.6) |
| 14:09.42 | *** join/#asterisk malcolmd (malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 14:09.43 | *** mode/#asterisk [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 14:13.21 | *** join/#asterisk marceloamorim (~marcelo@189-90-192-72.isimples.com.br) |
| 14:14.43 | *** join/#asterisk toasted (~toasted@pike.tlrtech.ca) |
| 14:15.22 | *** join/#asterisk nfi|ermes (~nfi-ermes@host25-9-static.224-95-b.business.telecomitalia.it) |
| 14:19.38 | *** join/#asterisk K0HAX (~K0HAX@c-75-72-143-131.hsd1.mn.comcast.net) |
| 14:20.33 | nfi|ermes | I'd like to convert a phisical asterisk PBX to a virtual one. I have 3 ISDN line entering to the pbx. To convert thos tlines i need a ISDN/SIP gateway . On internet i found this product: Patton SN 4120 2B . Anyone knows and/or suggest another product ? |
| 14:21.21 | WIMPy | You could do that. |
| 14:22.14 | WIMPy | But no matter which way you go, connecting the lines directely to your Asterisk will work a lot better. |
| 14:27.15 | *** join/#asterisk qakhan (~qakhan@50-204-254-12-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 14:31.47 | *** join/#asterisk vader- (~Adium@204.183.88.4) |
| 14:39.57 | nfi|ermes | thx WIMPy |
| 14:40.32 | nfi|ermes | but if i want vmotion between esx hosts i think it is the only way |
| 14:45.37 | *** join/#asterisk MadHatter42 (~MadHatter@unaffiliated/madhatter42) |
| 14:46.33 | WIMPy | Then get rid of the lines. Using a gateway doesn't make sense. |
| 14:47.08 | [TK]D-Fender | nfi|ermes: Patton is "OK" on average. Not always the easiest to work with, but I haven't heard anything about them being bad specifically |
| 14:58.16 | *** join/#asterisk _0x5eb_ (~seb@seb-hpws2.elen.ucl.ac.be) |
| 15:18.16 | *** join/#asterisk rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-qvwtrkijokzwifao) |
| 15:21.42 | *** join/#asterisk the-duke (~sb@p200300624A16500099B40F5BB3EF472F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 15:23.34 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe (~CeBe@port-92-200-30-250.dynamic.qsc.de) |
| 15:24.45 | the-duke | hi, incoming calls to sip phones are dropped frequently for unknown reasons - i recorded the call setup with asterisk debug flags - anyone an idea what could be the issue? http://pastebin.com/9ThcXByV |
| 15:25.19 | the-duke | http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=9ThcXByV in raw for better reading |
| 15:25.31 | *** join/#asterisk ipengineer (~zconkle@static-71-252-134-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net) |
| 15:27.00 | [TK]D-Fender | That shows nothing of a call "dying" |
| 15:27.08 | [TK]D-Fender | We see a cancel sent and no mention as to why |
| 15:27.18 | [TK]D-Fender | You'd need to show full verbose & SIP debug |
| 15:28.08 | the-duke | who send the cancel |
| 15:28.12 | the-duke | asterisk or the phone? |
| 15:30.01 | *** join/#asterisk superscrat (asanders@nat/digium/x-lmilinsqgdffigme) |
| 15:31.19 | [TK]D-Fender | Onlly part we see is Asterisk so far |
| 15:31.30 | [TK]D-Fender | This is poor debug and I don't want to take even this part as-is |
| 15:32.06 | the-duke | ok thank you for having a look at it |
| 15:35.06 | *** join/#asterisk svm_invictvs (~patricktw@unaffiliated/svminvictvs/x-938456) |
| 16:07.39 | *** join/#asterisk svm_invictvs (~patricktw@unaffiliated/svminvictvs/x-938456) |
| 16:16.59 | *** join/#asterisk sgriepentrog (sgriepentr@nat/digium/x-ovthedaldtvlbuyc) |
| 16:24.10 | *** join/#asterisk italorossi (~Adium@187.60.66.11) |
| 16:25.36 | *** join/#asterisk robink_ (~quassel@unaffilated/robink) |
| 16:29.40 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe (~CeBe@port-92-200-30-250.dynamic.qsc.de) |
| 16:37.43 | *** join/#asterisk gusto (~gusto@77.47.123.4.dynamic.cablesurf.de) |
| 16:40.06 | *** join/#asterisk pchero (~pchero@0x555140b5.adsl.cybercity.dk) |
| 16:45.52 | *** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-smfparxpxtmmavej) |
| 16:46.57 | *** join/#asterisk robl^ (~robl@pdpc/supporter/active/robl) |
| 16:59.32 | *** join/#asterisk babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-gpkfjzjvablpbiul) |
| 17:00.18 | *** join/#asterisk AlHafoudh (~AlHafoudh@echo.freevision.sk) |
| 17:02.36 | *** join/#asterisk hackeron (~hackeron@gentoo/user/hackeron) |
| 17:02.41 | *** join/#asterisk karelk (~karel@84-72-164-65.dclient.hispeed.ch) |
| 17:03.44 | *** join/#asterisk cryptic (~cryptic@pool-98-113-133-214.nycmny.fios.verizon.net) |
| 17:03.52 | *** join/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-axpfdzbqekpyxvyg) |
| 17:03.59 | *** join/#asterisk Greenlight (wluke@cpc18-dund12-2-0-cust490.16-4.cable.virginm.net) |
| 17:04.11 | *** join/#asterisk simplydrew (~simplydre@unaffiliated/simplydrew) |
| 17:04.21 | *** join/#asterisk [d__d] (~d__d]@ec2-54-85-45-223.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 17:05.22 | *** join/#asterisk shootbird (~quassel@beepbeep.serverpit.com) |
| 17:06.12 | *** join/#asterisk lorsungcu_ (uid65806@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qfthxdnkyxiwhshd) |
| 17:06.20 | *** join/#asterisk gringo (~gringo@unaffiliated/gringo) |
| 17:21.38 | *** join/#asterisk exuberocity (~exuberoci@50.58.121.235) |
| 17:44.34 | *** join/#asterisk eppigy (~Dave@snugglenets.com) |
| 17:44.40 | eppigy | hello |
| 17:44.42 | eppigy | I am Dave |
| 17:44.54 | [TK]D-Fender | yes |
| 17:44.55 | [TK]D-Fender | you are |
| 17:45.01 | eppigy | thank you |
| 17:45.10 | *** join/#asterisk areski (~areski@80.174.128.121.dyn.user.ono.com) |
| 17:45.12 | eppigy | how are you this fine day, [TK]D-Fender? |
| 17:45.31 | [TK]D-Fender | Same old, same old... |
| 17:45.33 | [TK]D-Fender | Getting stuff done |
| 17:45.37 | eppigy | excellent |
| 17:45.56 | eppigy | Did you see the news of mounting evidence that our reality is merely a projection? |
| 17:47.13 | [TK]D-Fender | You'd think the lesson of those pigs would teach a lesson about straw-based construction.... |
| 17:47.38 | eppigy | http://motherboard.vice.com/read/there-is-growing-evidence-that-our-universe-is-a-giant-hologram?utm_source=vicefbus |
| 17:48.25 | eppigy | I guess you have to accept that all theories about our universe are currently straw based structures |
| 17:48.35 | eppigy | so you can be free to enjoy each one. |
| 17:48.49 | eppigy | current theories |
| 17:48.58 | [TK]D-Fender | Thre are many other theories that are better than straw |
| 17:49.17 | eppigy | please enlighten me |
| 17:50.14 | [TK]D-Fender | Well there are all of the previous theories we are currently running on. |
| 17:50.43 | [TK]D-Fender | This #d in 2D plane is a singular brand new paper by one guy |
| 17:50.47 | [TK]D-Fender | D |
| 17:50.49 | [TK]D-Fender | 3D |
| 17:50.51 | [TK]D-Fender | gah |
| 17:51.46 | eppigy | well it springs from scientists trying to resovlve why the previous theories have holes or conflict |
| 17:52.07 | eppigy | so the previous theories are just pieces |
| 17:52.20 | eppigy | of a puzzle |
| 17:52.27 | eppigy | POSSIBLY A 2D PUZZLE |
| 17:52.29 | eppigy | lol |
| 17:53.16 | [TK]D-Fender | well this is the very first attempt to actually provide anything to back it up. it hasn't seen the onslaught of the rest of the scientific community yet :) |
| 17:53.28 | eppigy | that is true |
| 17:53.30 | [TK]D-Fender | It may as well still be a hypothesis :p |
| 17:53.54 | eppigy | I enjoy reading about reality and what it might be |
| 17:54.06 | eppigy | I'm sure it is something more strange than we can imagine. |
| 17:59.20 | superscrat | eppigy, are you talking about the holographic universe theory? |
| 18:02.06 | *** join/#asterisk robl^ (~robl@pdpc/supporter/active/robl) |
| 18:02.56 | wanda_ | :) |
| 18:06.01 | eppigy | superscrat: yes |
| 18:08.40 | superscrat | eppigy, I read about that on Friday night. It's interesting to me because I remembered reading an article about how the brain stores information and there is a theory that the brain stores data in the same way as a holographic storage network |
| 18:09.28 | eppigy | that is pretty cool |
| 18:12.17 | superscrat | That thought reminded me of something one of my college professors was researching. So, I then diverged into reading about the fractal-holographic universe theory. There certainly has been quite a lot of thought in this area. And, like you said, the math working out when you remove the third dimension, at the least, makes it an interesting idea. |
| 18:15.41 | *** join/#asterisk mdhas (~mdhas@76.9.206.238) |
| 18:23.00 | *** join/#asterisk exuberocity (~exuberoci@cpe-174-101-32-221.columbus.res.rr.com) |
| 18:24.55 | *** join/#asterisk aross42 (~aross@dsl-eclipsefnd.storm.ca) |
| 18:36.50 | *** join/#asterisk CeBe (~CeBe@port-92-200-30-250.dynamic.qsc.de) |
| 18:37.01 | *** join/#asterisk riess82 (~riessma@194-118-139-79.adsl.highway.telekom.at) |
| 18:48.45 | *** join/#asterisk sparetire_ (~sparetire@unaffiliated/sparetire) |
| 18:57.30 | *** join/#asterisk Sudravirodhin (~Sudraviro@162.218.22.124) |
| 19:01.56 | *** join/#asterisk K0HAX (~K0HAX@c-75-72-143-131.hsd1.mn.comcast.net) |
| 19:04.46 | *** join/#asterisk overyander (~Jeff@12.49.160.131) |
| 19:10.09 | DivideBy0 | I just found a couple sangoma usb timing sticks. Are they useful at all? maybe for vmware? |
| 19:18.47 | *** join/#asterisk SaintMoriarty (~SaintMori@ip68-228-236-156.ph.ph.cox.net) |
| 19:18.55 | SaintMoriarty | Hello! |
| 19:19.09 | *** join/#asterisk CustosLimen (~CustosLim@unaffiliated/cust0slim3n) |
| 19:25.28 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, hi there =) |
| 19:25.38 | SaintMoriarty | :) |
| 19:25.59 | SaintMoriarty | can anyone help me with a AMI action that will do a outbound call and connect it to a extension? |
| 19:35.07 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+13+ManagerAction_Originate |
| 19:35.25 | SaintMoriarty | I was looking at this yesterday |
| 19:35.46 | superscrat | I believe there are many examples in our testsuite, also, if you need a working example to use for reference. |
| 19:36.06 | SaintMoriarty | so the channel is the outbound and extend is where it will connect? |
| 19:39.30 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, Yes. By chance, do you have access to the testsuite? |
| 19:39.37 | SaintMoriarty | I do not |
| 19:39.50 | SaintMoriarty | can you point me to obtaining access |
| 19:40.16 | *** join/#asterisk slav3_kitten (~frankthet@unaffiliated/slav3-kitten/x-0866809) |
| 19:43.15 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, I am working on it... give me one more min |
| 19:45.40 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, our asterisk source is now on git at: https://gerrit.asterisk.org. There is a mirror also on github if you want to just look at the testsuite source. https://github.com/asterisk/testsuite |
| 19:47.06 | *** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-218-28-58.cablep.bezeqint.net) |
| 19:47.07 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, an example of an AMI originate call is in lib/python/asterisk/apptest.py |
| 19:48.01 | *** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@109.188.124.26) |
| 19:48.04 | superscrat | Around line 271, def __spawn_call_callback. |
| 19:51.48 | [TK]D-Fender | DivideBy0: USB timer = worthless now. Everything has moved to internal timing.... |
| 19:52.46 | SaintMoriarty | superscrat, thanks let me look |
| 19:54.12 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, no worries. I usually find that a working model serves as the best reference. The testsuite is chock full of them, too. It's a very good source of information. |
| 20:01.38 | SaintMoriarty | superscrat, do you know of a good Call Recording web interface? |
| 20:03.05 | *** join/#asterisk Cyford33_u (~cyford@c-73-207-183-115.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) |
| 20:08.45 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, sorry for the delay. No, I honestly do not have any knowledge of Web APIs for Call Recording. I am sure there are lots of them out there. Are you on #asterisk-dev? |
| 20:09.07 | SaintMoriarty | no let me see |
| 20:12.13 | *** join/#asterisk iulhk (iulhk@182.191.185.201) |
| 20:12.44 | superscrat | SaintMoriarty, I was just informed that #asterisk-dev is limited to discussing issues with the asterisk source code itself. And as such, the topic of a web api for call recording may be a bit too vague to receive any meaningful help from the participants in that conversation. I apologize for misdirecting you O.O. |
| 20:13.52 | SaintMoriarty | its k thank |
| 20:29.26 | iulhk | able to get udp packets at server but unable to get hit on asterisk server when trying to make video call, can anybody take look pls "http://paste.linuxassist.net/view/caa6ece4"? |
| 20:53.53 | *** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2) |
| 20:58.41 | iulhk | anybody tehre |
| 20:58.51 | iulhk | i mean there ? |
| 21:42.20 | *** join/#asterisk Cyford33_u (~cyford@c-73-207-183-115.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) |
| 21:46.13 | marceloamorim | how could I use func_odbc instead the appl |
| 21:46.44 | marceloamorim | app_mysql when I should insert one entrie on my sql |
| 21:47.17 | marceloamorim | like func_odbc to insert, I just found examples to update but I don't have the "where" part |
| 21:49.16 | *** join/#asterisk avb (~avb@93.84.64.100) |
| 21:49.55 | avb | guys, any idea why queue after dialing an agent via Local/ interface calling h extension right after the call were answered |
| 21:50.19 | avb | this is on asterisk 11 |
| 21:50.55 | avb | weird |
| 21:52.10 | Sudravirodhin | Maybe it can't read the state and assumes the device hung up. |
| 21:52.16 | Sudravirodhin | callcounter=yes? |
| 21:52.31 | *** join/#asterisk drewber (~drewber@2605:a000:c040:2600:c806:9b18:3a3f:91be) |
| 21:52.35 | avb | hm |
| 21:52.38 | avb | Sudravirodhin: let me see |
| 21:52.54 | avb | Sudravirodhin: yes, callcounter=yes |
| 21:53.10 | [TK]D-Fender | Maybe we shouldn't be guessing about this |
| 21:53.17 | [TK]D-Fender | Maybe we should be LOOKING at a call..... |
| 21:53.25 | Sudravirodhin | Fair enough. |
| 21:53.30 | Sudravirodhin | backs away. |
| 21:53.56 | avb | :) second, i will upload some logs |
| 21:55.09 | drewber | I have two servers connected via a T1. One of the servers is running FreePBX and has an analog Sangoma card that is connected to the PSTN. I have the link between the servers working. But I cannot seem to get the call to dial out. It calls, rings, and answers instantly but then hangs up. |
| 21:55.14 | drewber | Any ideas? |
| 21:55.57 | drmessano | Can anyone explain to me the significance of libuuid and uuid in later Asterisk releases? |
| 21:56.09 | marceloamorim | nervermind, I can use insert , just need to be the right syntax. sorry about that |
| 21:56.18 | [TK]D-Fender | drewber, No ideas. Show us the actual failure and maybe we'll develop some |
| 21:56.36 | drmessano | I think I just discovered a case where I was building with libuuid-dev (Ubuntu) but didn't have the uuid package installed.. and all my paging was hosed |
| 21:56.40 | avb | Sudravirodhin: [TK]D-Fender: http://pastebin.com/yS8HkDBr |
| 21:56.44 | drmessano | and Asterisk would sit at 100% CPU |
| 21:56.50 | avb | Sudravirodhin: agent is a cell phone |
| 21:57.04 | avb | which im dialing via the sip trunk |
| 21:57.52 | [TK]D-Fender | avb, No SIP debug, no debug of the call PRIOR to that point. This reveals nothing |
| 21:58.11 | drewber | [TK]D-Fender: http://pastebin.com/WJrNaisB |
| 21:59.07 | [TK]D-Fender | drewber, -- Requested transfer capability: 0x10 - 3K1AUDIO |
| 21:59.07 | [TK]D-Fender | <PROTECTED> |
| 21:59.41 | [TK]D-Fender | drewber, Where are you located? |
| 21:59.52 | drewber | The server is NY, NY |
| 22:00.11 | [TK]D-Fender | drewber, This is very off for the audio format, and is highly suspect right now. |
| 22:00.28 | [TK]D-Fender | drewber, show us your dahdhi configs |
| 22:00.48 | drewber | [TK]D-Fender: BTW, the server initiating the calls is a fax server running HylaFax. So that might by the reason |
| 22:01.12 | [TK]D-Fender | drewber, can't see how that'd factor in.... |
| 22:02.59 | avb | Sudravirodhin: [TK]D-Fender: http://pastebin.com/CRxrCTTz |
| 22:04.23 | drewber | [TK]D-Fender: /var/log/wanrouter http://pastebin.com/e1CheGwV |
| 22:04.28 | drewber | Is that what you were looking for? |
| 22:06.23 | [TK]D-Fender | avb, I'm not seeing that SIP call end, and I see nothing for the cahnnel that started this all off |
| 22:10.54 | WIMPy | drewber, [TK]D-Fender: 3K1Audio is the ONLY correct format there. So that's not the issue. |
| 22:10.54 | avb | [TK]D-Fender: because call were not ended |
| 22:10.54 | avb | thats why you do not see it |
| 22:10.54 | avb | before this log, there is ivr entries |
| 22:10.54 | [TK]D-Fender | drewber, I see no mention of mulaw for wanpipe2 |
| 22:10.54 | WIMPy | Show us where it ends. |
| 22:10.55 | [TK]D-Fender | WIMPy, If you can carry him further at this point, I'd be much obliged :) |
| 22:10.55 | [TK]D-Fender | avb, I can understand the local channel disappearing because of the outer channels getting bridged <- |
| 22:10.55 | WIMPy | It's one of the common mistakes when trying to send faxes with Asterisk. Using Speech BC will fail if the called party has ISDN and is configured correctly. |
| 22:10.56 | [TK]D-Fender | avb, This is normal unless you prevent them masquerading directly back to each other |
| 22:10.56 | avb | [TK]D-Fender: how i can do that? |
| 22:10.56 | avb | indeed, first channel were Local/5405504121@out-000000a5;1 |
| 22:10.57 | avb | and second real hangup were is Local/5405504121@out-000000a5;2 |
| 22:10.57 | *** join/#asterisk hayonj_away (4077d488@gateway/web/freenode/ip.64.119.212.136) |
| 22:10.57 | *** part/#asterisk hayonj_away (4077d488@gateway/web/freenode/ip.64.119.212.136) |
| 22:11.11 | drewber | [TK]D-Fender, WIMPy: I am a bit confused as to what my next step should be on troubleshooting |
| 22:11.20 | [TK]D-Fender | your memebers should be "local/number@context/n" <- |
| 22:11.33 | [TK]D-Fender | the /n prevents them from dissolving |
| 22:11.48 | avb | [TK]D-Fender: let me try |
| 22:11.49 | avb | thank you |
| 22:12.06 | WIMPy | drewber: The *CLI output of a failed call. And if that doesn't tell you what's going on, the next one is enabling pri debug. |
| 22:12.54 | drewber | WIMPy: I can enable pri debug. Not sure what *CLI output means |
| 22:13.49 | WIMPy | The verbose output from the Asterisk console. |
| 22:16.53 | *** join/#asterisk DivideBy0 (~DivideBy0@unaffiliated/divideby0x0) |
| 22:22.54 | *** join/#asterisk davlefou (~davlefou@unaffiliated/davlefou) |
| 22:27.23 | avb | [TK]D-Fender: thank you, thats clear things out |
| 22:27.35 | avb | i completely forgot about /n |
| 22:29.25 | [TK]D-Fender | avb, Glad it's working the way you want it to now... |
| 22:30.16 | avb | [TK]D-Fender: the worst part if the if I remembered this flag couple weeks earlier that could save me hours and hours of work :) |
| 22:30.47 | [TK]D-Fender | avb, Hindsight is 20/20 |
| 22:31.15 | avb | :) |
| 22:32.11 | *** join/#asterisk eschmidbauer_ (~eschmidba@unaffiliated/eschmidbauer) |
| 22:32.57 | *** join/#asterisk MadHatter42 (~MadHatter@unaffiliated/madhatter42) |
| 22:34.05 | Sudravirodhin | How difficult is it to coax an Asterisk feature (atxfer) into changing its outgoing caller ID? |
| 22:34.32 | Sudravirodhin | Would it be easier to code a context for attended transfers for the applicationmap? |
| 22:36.22 | *** join/#asterisk nix8n82 (~AndChat27@67-130-74-235.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 22:37.29 | *** join/#asterisk Kerberos76 (~Kerberos7@107.182.184.234.16clouds.com) |
| 22:38.54 | avb | were about to play with atxfer ami call tomorrow |
| 22:40.54 | *** join/#asterisk Hsilamot (~Hsilamot@187-177-21-35.dynamic.axtel.net) |
| 22:49.02 | iulhk | able to get udp packets at server but unable to get hit on asterisk server when trying to make video call, can anybody take look pls "http://paste.linuxassist.net/view/caa6ece4"? |
| 23:23.40 | *** join/#asterisk italorossi (~Adium@179.211.186.236) |
| 23:25.59 | *** join/#asterisk azerus (~badass@unaffiliated/badass) |
| 23:33.55 | *** part/#asterisk kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-axpfdzbqekpyxvyg) |
| 23:37.51 | *** join/#asterisk pchero (~pchero@0x555140b5.adsl.cybercity.dk) |
| 23:41.22 | *** join/#asterisk Chotaire (~chotaire@vegetarian.cannibal.club) |
| 23:44.32 | *** join/#asterisk MadHatter42 (~MadHatter@unaffiliated/madhatter42) |
| 23:46.09 | *** join/#asterisk idafyaid (~idafyaid3@unaffiliated/idafyaid) |
| 23:51.39 | *** join/#asterisk superscrat (~asanders@173-17-133-2.client.mchsi.com) |
| 23:55.09 | *** join/#asterisk Cyford33 (~cyford@c-73-207-183-115.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) |
| 23:59.36 | *** join/#asterisk fstd (~fstd@unaffiliated/fisted) |