IRC log for #asterisk on 20120921

00:00.04WIMPyindeed
00:00.14WIMPyWhat about the CPU?
00:00.17ChannelZThough I don't think albania-asterisk ever said what codec he was using
00:00.33albania-asteriskyes i said :)
00:00.42ChannelZI just missed it then
00:00.53WIMPyAOL
00:01.36albania-asteriskmost of the calls are p2p , but small part around 5% are transcoding from g729 to g711 or vice versa, on p2p around 60% is g711 and rest g729
00:01.40ChannelZBut in any case is something in the chain maybe just not able to keep up with the amount of packets it's having to analyize to route?  A cheap-ass router or something
00:02.12WIMPyQuite possible.
00:02.30*** join/#asterisk wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com)
00:02.48albania-asteriskyou didn't tell me , how many concurrent calls should i think to have one asterisk box for production
00:02.50albania-asteriskon max
00:03.14ChannelZI'm not sure there really is a number
00:03.28WIMPyNo. Far too many factors.
00:03.31ChannelZAnd I don't think this is an Asterisk problem in this case anyway.
00:03.43albania-asteriskfor asterisk 1.4 or 1.8
00:04.41ChannelZIf the interface is reporting packets disappearing that's upstream of Asterisk.  UNLESS it happens to be the one not processing fast enough causing the buffers to overrun
00:05.00ChannelZIs the loadav particularly high or anything?
00:05.02WIMPyBut if you need a lot of g.729 transcoding, a hardware transcoder card may be cheaper.
00:05.21*** join/#asterisk mchou (~quassel@unaffiliated/mchou)
00:05.33albania-asteriskduring 1300-1500 concurrent calls , loadav is 10-18
00:06.04ChannelZshit and I just closed the pastebin window... How many cores?
00:06.17albania-asterisk16
00:06.50WIMPyLooks like scratching on the limit there.
00:06.52ChannelZSo it's working its tail off
00:07.14WIMPyIf that's due to CPU time, that's an issue.
00:07.26ChannelZyah
00:07.57WIMPyTake a look at how much idle time you have under heavy load.
00:08.16WIMPyIf there isn't any left, you ran out of CPU power.
00:08.41albania-asteriskactually CPU i have seen max 480%
00:09.19albania-asteriskbut this is spread through all cores, meaning 30% per CPU lets say
00:10.06WIMPy<gavimobile> ChannelZ: your answer is logical, what about my sip provider?
00:10.11WIMPy<gavimobile> my itsp*
00:10.13WIMPy<gavimobile> could they be the problem which causes my pbx to attemplt several
00:10.18WIMPyF***
00:10.30WIMPyWhere do you get that number from?
00:10.34ChannelZpaste diarrhea?
00:10.47albania-asterisk:)
00:10.52WIMPyYes
00:11.03ChannelZheh ok
00:11.16WIMPyIt sometimes happes that I hit the mouse in a way that pastes the window back to itself :-(
00:11.18albania-asterisknever heard of paste diarrhea , seems fitting
00:12.02WIMPyQuite annoying.
00:12.04albania-asteriskso loadaverage is on the limit ?
00:12.26WIMPyPossibly.
00:12.37WIMPyDepends on the causes.
00:12.48albania-asteriskbut i amsure that there is a lot of idle on cpus
00:12.56albania-asteriskduring peak
00:12.57WIMPyThat's why I suggested watching the idle time instead.
00:13.51albania-asteriski should see tomorow and let you know
00:13.56WIMPyWhat about SMP capable reception?
00:14.05WIMPyWhat kernel do you have?
00:14.06albania-asteriskwhat is that ?
00:14.41WIMPyNot that long ago the network receive routines in the kernel got SMP enabled.
00:15.06WIMPyCan't remember if it was on the change to 3.0 or when.
00:15.11albania-asterisk2.6.18-308.1.1.el5
00:15.25WIMPyGet a new kernel.
00:15.39WIMPyYou want that feature.
00:15.53WIMPyOr rather I think you may need it.
00:16.53WIMPyUnless the cause for your issue is outside of the server.
00:17.32albania-asteriski see,
00:18.06albania-asteriskthat fact that i dont have icmp packet loss or tcp errors is it telling me that the problem is not outside the server ?
00:19.08albania-asteriskif the switches/router gives low priority to udp yes, but there is not such thing
00:19.17albania-asteriskthey are transparent
00:19.17WIMPyThe number of overruns doesn;t seem to be the cause to me, but the udp errors you see seem strange to me.
00:19.31WIMPyBut I have no clue what they mean :-(
00:20.07albania-asteriski will upgrade server to new kernel
00:20.29albania-asteriskand tell tomorrow about idle time
00:22.09albania-asteriskthank you
00:30.26*** join/#asterisk barbosa2 (~juliano.b@177.43.91.206)
00:44.39*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
00:49.41*** join/#asterisk volga629 (~volga629@76-10-130-18.dsl.teksavvy.com)
00:49.47volga629http://fpaste.org/d39D/
00:50.13volga629this is what I see quality of video just bad
00:51.27volga629me hard to tell what is not right
00:51.57*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
00:57.33*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
00:58.13*** join/#asterisk sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell)
00:58.13*** mode/#asterisk [+o sruffell] by ChanServ
01:12.29*** join/#asterisk sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell)
01:12.29*** mode/#asterisk [+o sruffell] by ChanServ
01:18.14*** join/#asterisk Sorcier_FXK (~nsystem@unaffiliated/sorcierfxk)
01:33.05*** join/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@197.172.79.138)
01:45.56*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@cpe-66-74-182-202.socal.res.rr.com)
01:54.54*** join/#asterisk YoMomma_ (~YoMomma@71-95-164-90.static.mtpk.ca.charter.com)
02:05.17*** join/#asterisk chuckf (~chuckf@fedora/chuck)
02:07.01*** join/#asterisk deo (~dnepangue@203.177.214.75)
02:10.32*** join/#asterisk nickgaw (~nick@70-139-55-30.lightspeed.hstntx.sbcglobal.net)
02:10.48nickgawHi, Are the asus netbooks ok for a small home asterisk setup?
02:11.10WIMPyEasy
02:11.56nickgawdo any of the asterisk versions support wireless or just wired connections?
02:12.24WIMPyWhat does Asterisk have to do with your connection?
02:13.04nickgawthe netbook supports both wired and wireless network connections what I am trying to find out is what is best for a small home asterisk setup?
02:13.39WIMPyWifi is not the best choice for realtime streams.
02:14.39nickgawbut can it work just to get the asterisk system installed over the network then I could always transfer it to the wired network when it is completely setup?
02:15.12WIMPySure
02:15.29WIMPyHow could it make a difference what network connection you use to install?
02:15.49nickgawwell speed I thought was better on wired?
02:16.17WIMPyThat's only a question of your patience.
02:16.47nickgawbut for the phone system working itself it is best to use wired networking?
02:17.17WIMPyYes
02:18.16nickgawwith centos how do you configure wireless networking?  I will have access to the system using ssh so I can have root access before I go and do the asterisk installation portion?
02:18.34*** join/#asterisk YoMomma (~YoMomma@cpe-142-129-178-68.socal.res.rr.com)
02:19.17WIMPyYou have to ask that to the RedHat guys.
02:20.03unicronmy wifi is solid, i have a 1W dongle with a big yagi antenna
02:20.17nickgawdo they make adapters for normal phones that allow them to become sip phones over the wireless network or do they all need to be wired?
02:20.22WIMPyAnd no neighbours?
02:20.33volga629http://fpaste.org/d39D/
02:20.51unicronmy antenna can see four neighbors' networks
02:20.59volga629this debug for res_rtp_asterisk.c:2143 ast_rtp_read: RTP Read too short
02:21.05WIMPynickgaw: You can use Asterisk plus additional hardware to do that, yes.
02:22.45nickgawwould stores like bestbuy sell this type of stuff or any sip phones?
02:37.03nickgawmy asus netbook has no DVD burner so how can I make a complete backup of the windows 7 installation on it before installing any version of linux?
02:37.24WIMPyNetwork?
02:38.02nickgawwell then how can I restore the backup with just linux loadded?
02:38.28WIMPyDerpends on how you do the backup.
02:39.38nickgawdo they make a program in windows where I can have direct access to another computer's DVD burner threw usb?
02:39.58WIMPyAsk Microsoft.
02:41.46nickgawis there a version of asterisk that runs under windows?
02:42.36nickgawor is it best to backup windows and then just reinstall linux with asterisk?
02:43.02WIMPyThere has been one.
02:43.10WIMPyI have no idea if it is maintained.
02:43.33nickgawwould using virtualbox on a netbook work?
02:44.36WIMPyShould be ok without hardware interfaces.
02:45.22nickgawso devices don't exist that I attatch to the hardware phones to convert them into wireless sip phones?
02:46.33WIMPyDirectely to wireless? Not sure.
02:47.02WIMPyI haven't seen such a thing. But I never looked for one, either.
02:47.07nickgawwhat type of devices were you thinking of?
02:47.41WIMPy?
02:48.10nickgawphone hardware devices what types of devices would you normally use?
02:48.54WIMPyI prefer real phones.
02:49.16nickgawyes me to do you mean sip phones that connect using a network cable?
02:49.22*** join/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@197.172.79.138)
02:50.14WIMPyI use one of them, but the rest are old fashioned ISDN phones.
02:50.42nickgawso the normal land line phones won't work?
02:51.10WIMPyIt's just a question of the right interface/adaptor.
02:52.56nickgawso it is possible what I am trying to do?
02:53.21WIMPyWhat *exactely* do you want to do?
02:54.11nickgawconvert land phones to sip phones but make them connect using wifi to the wireless network so I can place them all around the house and not have long wires going everywhere?
02:54.38WIMPyShort answer: yes
02:55.21WIMPyBut as mentioned: I don't know Wifi ATAs, so you might need bit an ATA and some Wifi router for each phone.
02:55.52WIMPyNot sure how mich sense it makes to carry two devices plus two PSUs around with a telephone.
02:56.04WIMPyThere are Wifi phones.
02:56.35WIMPyBut you will usually be much better of using DECT/CAT-iq phones.
02:56.40WIMPy+f
02:56.44nickgawok wifi phones might work how much are they in the USA and are they easy to setup?
02:57.30WIMPyI don;t know your definition of easy, but it's about the same ans any SIP phone.
02:57.45WIMPy-n
02:57.56nickgawdo they also have network ports on them or are they only wifi?
02:58.16WIMPyWifi phones are wifo phones.
02:58.57WIMPySome desktop phones that usually connect via ethernet have support for USB wifi donges as an alternative.
02:59.58nickgawso the phone has a menu where you configure the wifi settings and other settings?
03:00.09WIMPyyes
03:00.19WIMPyOr you use a web interface.
03:00.54nickgawhow much are the wifi phones?
03:01.05WIMPyNo idea
03:01.28nickgawwould contacting an asterisk technition be any help?
03:02.28WIMPyI'd hope so. Otherwise they would be pretty pointless.
03:03.12kikohnlThese may not be the best prices but I have used the company before, great service. http://www.voipsupply.com/voip-phones/wi-fi
03:04.46nickgawwhat is the latest version of asterisk that supports google voice with an add on module?
03:05.26*** join/#asterisk liuyan (~Miranda@211.154.128.171)
03:10.06volga629res_rtp_asterisk.c:2143 ast_rtp_read: RTP Read too short what will the cause for this message
03:11.40WIMPySounds like a broken packet to me.
03:13.07volga6292 hours can' find the cause I was previously point to problems on physical layer like cable speed, I checked everything and it not something on configuration not right
03:13.52volga629ups sorry   I mean it something with configuration
03:14.39WIMPyIt can alwys be a software fault at any point.
03:14.50volga629might on machine where vpn tunnel firewall ?
03:15.05volga629not really
03:15.07WIMPyANY point
03:15.32volga629usually human factor always present
03:17.26volga629you have match bigger experience in Voip that for sure
03:17.31volga629me
03:17.50WIMPyI try not to care too much.
03:24.57*** join/#asterisk NightMonkey (~NightrMon@pdpc/supporter/professional/nightmonkey)
03:28.06*** join/#asterisk linocisco (~linocisco@193.134.242.12)
03:36.09volga629so what you think need check it to resolve the issue
03:37.44WIMPyI'd probably try to run wireshark and see if it moans about the packet contest.
03:41.09*** join/#asterisk lkthomas (~lkthomas@59.152.236.158)
03:41.20*** join/#asterisk g_r_eek (~g_r_eek@173-9-142-122-Miami.FL.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
03:41.28lkthomashey guys, other than dahdi_tool, what program can I use for non-interactive command check for dahdi status ?
03:42.29WIMPyNon-interactive?
03:43.47lkthomasdahdi_tool
03:43.54lkthomasit's interactive program
03:45.15WIMPy/proc/dahdi/...
03:45.31WIMPyOr use asterisk -rx "dahdi show ..."
03:50.35*** join/#asterisk sustav (~vpp@76.73.166.16)
03:51.06*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202)
03:51.45*** join/#asterisk mKn0wt (~mtv@190.181.137.101)
03:52.23lkthomasWIMPy: is that the same ? does dahdi_tool use procfs ?
03:52.52WIMPyI haven't looked at the internals of dahdi_tool.
03:53.05*** join/#asterisk RiceCracker (~RiceCrack@59.152.236.158)
03:55.21*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
03:55.41lkthomasWIMPy: source code: http://www.xelatec.com/trac/pub/browser/xosipt/team/sh/d01/apps/ast_base/dahdi-2.2.1/tools/dahdi_tool.c
03:57.31WIMPyI guess that makes a "no".
04:02.19*** join/#asterisk volga629 (~volga629@76-10-130-18.dsl.teksavvy.com)
04:10.01lkthomasWIMPy: yes, seems it's using dahdi library instead
04:14.18*** join/#asterisk D-Boy (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
04:23.36*** join/#asterisk Carlos_PHX_ (~Carlos@ip68-2-227-192.ph.ph.cox.net)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk D-Boy (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk NightMonkey (~NightrMon@pdpc/supporter/professional/nightmonkey)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk niluje (~niluje@82.227.67.242)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk Sprocks (~Sprocks@bas1-brampton37-1176135265.dsl.bell.ca)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk sideffect (sideffect@gateway/shell/bshellz.net/x-ayglakqohkqxqbih)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk jaytee (~jforde051@unaffiliated/jaytee)
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk Qwell (~north@pdpc/sponsor/digium/Qwell)
04:28.34*** mode/#asterisk [+o Qwell] by sturgeon.freenode.net
04:28.38*** join/#asterisk mirela666 (~Thunderbi@212.200.146.253)
04:32.41flingHello! how can I increase sip registry refresh timeout?
04:32.50flingAlso is not it a bad idea?
04:34.16*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
04:55.07*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
05:12.38*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.212.120.182)
05:14.05ChannelZAre you refreshing due to dynamic IP?
05:19.45*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
05:25.39*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
05:27.25*** join/#asterisk Hyper_Eye (~mwoodj@pdpc/sponsor/digium/hyper-eye)
05:28.56*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@184-155-136-196.cpe.cableone.net)
05:41.41flingChannelZ: I'm refreshing due to stupid ISP :p
05:41.52flingChannelZ: they have fixed most of the issues
05:42.12flingChannelZ: but did not gave me any instructions on their service usage
05:42.50flingChannelZ: they also said thas I need to increase the timeout to solve my issue
05:43.02*** join/#asterisk Faustov (user@gentoo/user/faustov)
05:43.17flingit is 45 seconds now, I need 20 minutes
05:43.35*** join/#asterisk Neptu (~Neptu@213-67-244-97-no100.tbcn.telia.com)
05:47.44flingChannelZ: ip is not a dynamic one, it is 10.x.x.x
05:55.17*** join/#asterisk Faustov (user@gentoo/user/faustov)
06:01.24*** join/#asterisk v0lZy (~Thunderbi@mail.silk-group.net)
06:02.07*** join/#asterisk vfabi (~fabi@host-static-93-116-255-140.moldtelecom.md)
06:10.52*** part/#asterisk liuyan (~Miranda@211.154.128.171)
06:13.50*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.212.120.182)
06:19.31*** join/#asterisk lorsungcu (~anonymous@65.103.31.38)
06:23.06*** join/#asterisk fisted_ (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
06:26.20flingChannelZ: registertimeout is not what I want?
06:41.20*** join/#asterisk sideffect (sideffect@gateway/shell/bshellz.net/x-uxjboeuwcrojwfsl)
06:41.40*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
06:41.52*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
06:42.51*** join/#asterisk pietro (~pietro@81-174-3-44.v4.ngi.it)
06:47.45*** join/#asterisk jsjc (~Adium@62.Red-83-42-126.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net)
06:49.25*** join/#asterisk bjornts (~BTS@it010226.klientdrift.uib.no)
06:55.58*** join/#asterisk d00gster (~doughant@173.195.1.80)
07:01.46*** join/#asterisk d00gster (~doughant@173.195.1.80)
07:03.06ChannelZwell if they are forgetting your registration I guess.  In any event look at defaultexpiry in sip.conf
07:12.07*** join/#asterisk pbxMan (c335d9a5@gateway/web/freenode/ip.195.53.217.165)
07:30.19*** join/#asterisk mintos (mvaliyav@nat/redhat/x-mrriujafptzbepin)
07:34.25*** join/#asterisk amessina (~amessina@2001:470:c1dc:7779:d6be:d9ff:fe8d:7c1e)
07:46.38flingChannelZ: how to change for few hosts but not for all?
07:56.21ChannelZsee the ~expiry option in your register => line
07:59.10*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.215.82.210)
08:00.54*** join/#asterisk bulkorok (~bulkorok@85.183.36.36)
08:04.40*** join/#asterisk k610 (~Instantbi@cred.epid.ucl.ac.be)
08:08.09*** join/#asterisk nickfennell (~nickfenne@unaffiliated/nickfennell)
08:10.40flingChannelZ: where?
08:11.45*** join/#asterisk darkskiez (~mhb@fsf/member/darkskiez)
08:12.01flingregister => …:…:…@…/…~(here?)
08:12.29*** join/#asterisk vfabi (~fabi@host-static-93-116-255-140.moldtelecom.md)
08:12.56ChannelZOpen the example sip.conf and search for "register =>" and the format of the line is explained
08:13.03ChannelZbut basically yes
08:14.57flingChannelZ: and if I set it to 1200 and I still see 45 in 'sip shor registry' then something wrong with my provider?
08:27.36*** join/#asterisk oquidave (~oquidave@41.223.84.35)
08:36.52*** join/#asterisk d00gster (~doughant@bba773204.alshamil.net.ae)
08:37.32*** join/#asterisk jsjc (~Adium@226.Red-80-33-236.staticIP.rima-tde.net)
08:45.30oquidavehello people
08:46.29oquidavei've been trying to install astaresk 1.8 on opensuse 12.1 this whole week to which i succeeded...but i've a few observations that still buffer me...
08:47.15oquidavewhen i start asaterisk using  /usr/sbin/asterisk -gvvvc, and check for loaded modules using, module show, 0 modules are loaded!!
08:48.31oquidavehowever, when i start asterisk using, /etc/init.d/asterisk start it redirects to systemctl and just hangs untill i close the process and use /etc/init.d/asterisk restart
08:49.08oquidavethen when i check for loaded modules, a long list of modules is rightfully loaded
08:49.28oquidaveQuestion: why am i experiencing this behaviour?
08:50.14oquidaveasterisk 1.8 is compiled and installed as root user togather with dahdi and libpri libraries on opensuse12.1
08:51.01oquidavethanks
08:55.49*** join/#asterisk brdude (~brdude@c-24-7-76-160.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
09:01.39*** join/#asterisk aboven (~aboven@host-85-201-12-229.brutele.be)
09:03.30*** join/#asterisk gusto (~gusto@2001:a60:11ff:1200::42:4)
09:03.47*** join/#asterisk gusto (~gusto@2001:a60:11ff:1200::42:4)
09:07.06*** join/#asterisk D-Boy (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
09:18.46*** join/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@197.172.79.138)
09:22.42*** join/#asterisk Serpent (Archer_Ser@unaffiliated/serpent)
09:25.01*** part/#asterisk Serpent (Archer_Ser@unaffiliated/serpent)
09:27.29*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@82-168-115-40.ip.telfort.nl)
09:37.30*** join/#asterisk darkskiez (~mhb@fsf/member/darkskiez)
09:44.23flingI have an old phone connected to sip pata converter
09:44.35flingHow can I use transfer using this phone?
09:44.56WIMPySee,the manual of your ata.
09:45.00flingoh
09:45.20WIMPyOr use features as in features.conf.
09:45.24flingWIMPy: are there some default numbers to dial for transfer?
09:45.48WIMPyYes. See that file.
09:45.57flingthanks
09:49.19flingWIMPy: I do not see in the default file what to dial for a simple transfer
09:51.33*** join/#asterisk hariom (~hariom@117.195.191.205)
09:53.51hariomI have asterisk server running on a remote server. I started asterisk using "asterisk" command without "-c" or "-r" options. When I login to the remote server terminal (i.e. Shell prompt. Not * CLI), and then make a phone call, I am able to listen prompt but when I am not logged into the terminal (i.e. exit from ssh), I am not able to connect via phone. Phone simply disconnects
09:54.04hariomHow to fix this behavior?
09:55.09hariomPls note that asterisk is running a normal user (not the root user). Does that mean the normal user needs to be logged in?
09:55.46wdoekesno it does not.. but it needs to be disowned before you can logout.. normally starting it without any options would do that (put it in daemon mode)
09:56.05unicrontry running it like this: nohup asterisk >/dev/zero </dev/null &
09:56.18unicroner, did i get those backwards
09:56.39wdoekeser.. you don't want /dev/zero for either
09:56.47unicronor run it inside screen, then you can have your console too
09:57.00*** join/#asterisk nickfennell (~nickfenne@unaffiliated/nickfennell)
09:58.15wdoekesperhaps hariom has nofork=yes in asterisk.conf? or some kind of wrapper script called asterisk?
09:59.18hariomunicron: I didn't get what you mean by run it inside screen? I just login to the remote server to check the log file time to time. I believe that asterisk with the command ("asterisk") without any options would run in the background.
09:59.38wdoekeshariom: what does "jobs" say after starting it?
09:59.39hariomwdoekes: Will check for nofork=yes. I am running an IVR via AGI
09:59.43unicronscreen runs in the background and attaches your programs to it
09:59.57unicronso you can log back in and resume your screen and all your stuff will be running still
10:00.17wdoekes(but running screen shouldn't be needed, unless you want to)
10:00.34*** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/chainsaw)
10:00.59flingWIMPy: is *71 the default?
10:02.26unicroni'm a noob so i like to randomly interact with the CLI, that's why i like screen
10:02.32*** join/#asterisk kresp0 (~kresp0@213.37.150.59.dyn.user.ono.com)
10:03.35*** join/#asterisk vfabi (~fabi@host-static-93-116-255-140.moldtelecom.md)
10:04.47*** join/#asterisk d00gster (~doughant@bba773204.alshamil.net.ae)
10:05.11hariomwdoekes: I have nofork=yes commented (i.e. disabled)
10:05.29hariomwdoekes: jobs doesn't give any output
10:05.56*** join/#asterisk d00gster (~doughant@bba773204.alshamil.net.ae)
10:08.25flingWIMPy: it is not transferring
10:08.35hariomwdoekes: Any other suggestion? what is nofork=yes for?
10:09.27WIMPyfling: Then your dtmfmode may be wrong. Make sure the ATA and Asterisk are configured to the same way of transmitting DTMF.
10:12.30hariomWhen I exit from the remote server's shell prompt, I know that asterisk process is running as I see in "ps -e" when I ssh again to the server. But surprisingly, it doesn't handle any calls (call just drops no ring) when I exit from remote shell terminal.
10:13.45hariomIf I keep myself logged in, asterisk handles the call. When I exit from the remoter server, asterisk drops the call. I am running asterisk with the command "asterisk" i.e. without any options
10:14.15WIMPyIs that some strange security "feature"?
10:14.36*** join/#asterisk the_voice_ (~Ben@bzq-79-180-28-247.red.bezeqint.net)
10:14.41unicronmaybe the server is killing your background processes when you logout
10:14.51the_voice_anyone here know of any SMS enabled DID providers?
10:15.25*** join/#asterisk RypPn (~RypPn@unaffiliated/ryppn)
10:16.00wdoekeshariom: ok, if it's still running after you ssh again, it wasn't killed because of the lost shell (so fork/jobs is not an issue)
10:16.11hariomunicron: It doesn't kill the process as when I logs in, I can see asterisk process running (I can connect via "asterisk -r" and also ps -e says so)
10:16.38wdoekesin that case, I have absolutely no idea what your problem is :)
10:16.41hariomwdoekes: yea
10:16.50wdoekesincrease debug level and verbosity and check that
10:16.57wdoekes(make sure it goes somewhere, see logger.conf)
10:19.09hariomwdoekes: Actually I have asterisk run at boot time as it is registered as a service to run at all run levels (I did make config)
10:21.58flingWIMPy: I can call from this phone, but numbers in menu are not working (and if I call from pstn dtmf are not working too)
10:22.30flingWIMPy: I have tried to change dtmf to info in pata-sip converter settings, still have this problem
10:26.24WIMPyThe best choce is probably to use rfc2833 if available.
10:26.33flingWIMPy: ok
10:26.42hariomWhen asterisk running as non root user mode, should the user be a system user?
10:27.12WIMPyAnd if it's not working, there's probably a configuration mismatch between the ATA and Asterisk.
10:27.22hariomI am facing problem when I exit from the remote server. Asterisk stops handling the calls. But when I am logged into the server, it handles the calls fine
10:27.29flingWIMPy: ok, thanks, I will check it
10:27.34WIMPyWhat is a "system user"?
10:27.42flingWIMPy: the one from /etc/passwd
10:27.53WIMPyOh, sure.
10:28.03WIMPyFrom where else?
10:28.12flinghehe
10:28.47flingor if we call about _system_ it is the user with uid<1000
10:28.55flings/call/talk
10:29.29WIMPyThat's why I asked.
10:29.30hariomI don't think it is mandatory to remain logging into remote server for asterisk to handle calls
10:29.50flinghariom: umm?
10:29.56WIMPyhariom: Not something I have ever heard of before.
10:30.33hariomWIMPy: but here in my case, it is happening something like this. I am also clue less why is it happening like this
10:31.22WIMPySo am I.
10:31.45flingWIMPy: how can I simply test is my dtmf working?
10:32.06WIMPyhariom: Have you tried to start other demons that way?
10:32.28WIMPyfling: Call some extension that has a menu. e.g. VoiceMailMain.
10:32.31hariomWIMPy: other demons? which ones?
10:32.41flingright…
10:33.27WIMPyhariom: ftpd, httpd, anything.
10:33.39flinghariom: sshd :|
10:33.46hariomWIMPy: nope. I don't have any of these on my remote server
10:35.20hariomfling: sshd will run. The issue which I think could be is that sshd is installed as a root user where as asterisk is running as a normal user (non root user). By default, ftpd, httpd etc will also gets installed as root user ownership
10:36.08WIMPyThey all would be as much root as Asterisk.
10:36.15hariomthe question now is, Does running in non-root user mode forces asterisk to not handle calls when that user is not logged in?
10:36.33WIMPyThey can run as root, but are usually configured to drop privileges.
10:36.36*** join/#asterisk darkskiez (~mhb@fsf/member/darkskiez)
10:36.45hariomWIMPy: I never tried running httpd, ftpd or sshd in non root user previleges
10:36.57hariomWIMPy: yea, once started
10:37.21WIMPyUsually, yes.
10:37.50WIMPyNot different from Asterisk.
10:38.04hariomUsually, yes ? for what
10:38.08WIMPyIt has all 3 options as well.
10:39.03flinghariom: tell me what are you doing? :p
10:39.31hariomfling: I am facing problem when I exit from the remote server. Asterisk stops handling the calls. But when I am logged into the server, it handles the calls fine
10:40.09flinghariom: do you have root access? why are not you using initscript?
10:41.34hariomfling: I did "make config" . So I think when I restart, system uses initscript to start asterisk
10:41.47flinghariom: check it!
10:41.58hariomfling: checked it
10:42.14flingcan you start and stop it with initscript?
10:42.19WIMPyDoes it work after boot?
10:42.29*** join/#asterisk g_r_eek (~g_r_eek@173-9-142-122-Miami.FL.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
10:42.31hariomfling: when I reboot the system it starts * automatically
10:42.37hariom"make config"
10:43.57flingWIMPy: do I need to 'Enable Out-of-Band DTMF' ?
10:44.07*** join/#asterisk darkskiez (~mhb@fsf/member/darkskiez)
10:44.27WIMPyfling: You don;t strictly need it, but you want it, yes.
10:45.07flingWIMPy: only if I enable this option I can select rfc2833 or sipinfo
10:45.20flingso it is enabled and rfc2833 selected
10:45.47WIMPygood
10:46.59*** join/#asterisk g_r_eek (~g_r_eek@173-9-142-122-Miami.FL.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
10:47.34the_voice_okay so I tai it no one here knows of any SMS enabled providers?  Twilio, Plivo and Tropo all seem to have SMS's enabled on their numbers and I am trying to figure out how they did it
10:48.25*** join/#asterisk TimeRider (~steve@host81-136-216-215.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
10:48.39*** join/#asterisk cneb3000 (~cneb3000@b01977b3.bb.sky.com)
10:49.44flingWIMPy: it works now, I can walk in menu
10:51.39flingin CALL FEATURE CODE Call Transfer is set to *71
10:51.52*** join/#asterisk v0lZy (~Thunderbi@mail.silk-group.net)
10:52.21flingbut when I press *71 ata sends these tones to asterisk and asterisk sends tones to the second caller
10:52.29flinginstead of transfer
10:53.07WIMPyYou need to enable transfers in the Dial application. See option t and T.
10:53.33WIMPyis AFK again
10:53.54ectospasmfling: "core show application Dial" << look for both T and t
10:54.33wdoekeshariom: stop repeating the question and start reading verbose/debug logs
10:55.10hariomwdoekes: nothing gets into it when I am logged out.
10:55.41hariomwdoekes: you doesn't know doesn't mean others also won't know the issue. I tried what you mentioned
10:56.18wdoekesyour issue is seriously odd.. and spamming the channel is always uncalled for
10:57.00wdoekespb the log before and after you logout.. if *nothing* happens, I doubt that your verbosity/debug is high enough
10:57.06wdoekesor asterisk is in SIGSTOP mode
10:57.08flingectospasm: thanks
10:57.12*** join/#asterisk grohne (~grohne@vortex.stw-bonn.de)
10:57.17wdoekesps fax | grep T
10:57.48*** join/#asterisk barbosa2 (~juliano.b@177.43.91.206)
10:57.54hariomwdoekes: 1358 pts/0    S+     0:00              \_ grep --color=auto T
10:58.04wdoekesok, so asterisk is running
10:58.05hariomnothing found. I have fax disabled
10:58.15hariomsorry!
10:58.32hariom:)
10:58.48grohnehi. if I need more features in libpri. to which mailinglist would I send patches?
10:58.49hariomI guess I should take a coffee
10:59.42grohneis that on topic on asterisk-dev@?
11:00.24wdoekesnever send patches to the mailing list
11:00.29wdoekesattach them to a bug report in jira
11:00.38wdoekesissues.asterisk.org/jira
11:01.07wdoekesyou may have to wait a couple of days before getting your submitters license approved
11:02.09wdoekesand.. even better, create a reviewboard item in reviewboard.asterisk.org after creating the ticket in jira
11:02.23wdoekesit will spam asterisk-dev that there is something to evaluate
11:03.11flingectospasm: will it work with default features.conf?
11:03.30ectospasmfling: it should
11:04.04flingectospasm: do I even need to setup anything on ATA? or asterisk should do the Transfer?
11:04.16*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:e5cf:6fe6:6d65:275f)
11:04.27ectospasmfling: I wouldn't think that setting up anything on the ATA is required, but YMMV...
11:05.32flingectospasm: but I don't see anything about *71 in asterisk config
11:06.52ectospasmfling: you probably need to set either atxfer or blindxfer to *71 in features.conf
11:07.53grohnewdoekes: thanks for the pointers.
11:08.24*** join/#asterisk nisam (~nisam@125.22.91.2)
11:09.07flingectospasm: so *71 is not the default? what is the default for asterisk? or I should set something anyway?
11:14.17ectospasmfling: see the annotated features.conf (sample file)... blindxfer => #1, atxfer => *2, afaict
11:14.40flingectospasm: oh! thanks!
11:15.08ectospasmfling: but you can redefine them to be anything
11:15.27ectospasm...if you want to change it so it matches your provider's vertical service codes, go for it
11:16.16flingno, I will keep it
11:27.28*** join/#asterisk aross42 (~aross@CPE485b390978ce-CM00222ddf42dd.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
11:27.40flingso I transfer using #, it works fine
11:27.45flingectospasm: thanks ^
11:31.15*** join/#asterisk FiReSTaRT (~dlyh@unaffiliated/firestart)
11:31.37*** join/#asterisk adolfomaltez (~taro@190.62.203.66)
11:38.08*** join/#asterisk StaRetji (~LittleAll@87.250.55.105)
11:38.13StaRetjiHowdy folks
11:41.06StaRetjiif I use in extensions.conf, commands in order 1,2,3 and then I do #include another.conf and #include yetanother.conf and then 4,5,6 and so on
11:41.34StaRetjiwill asterisk process this conf in that order?
11:41.55StaRetji1,2,3 values from 2 confs and after finish parsing them continue to 4.5.6?
11:44.08*** join/#asterisk nickfennell (~nickfenne@unaffiliated/nickfennell)
11:46.22StaRetjilike 1.do this, 2.do that, 3. parse some.conf (there are like 100 lines), once finish, continue parsing extensions.conf?
11:46.52StaRetjiforgive this poor noob if question is silly :)
11:47.32StaRetjiI am just affraid if I do 1.2. and parse some.conf that remaining of extensions.conf will be ignored
11:48.26*** join/#asterisk robl^ (~robl^@pdpc/supporter/active/robl)
11:50.47*** join/#asterisk angryuser (~Angryuser@LPuteaux-151-42-27-99.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr)
11:51.44angryuserHello, i have a two port E1 card, one in NT connected to old pbx, and one in TE mode, when i dial by console by TE port it works, when i dial by PBX, it try to dial by TE port, i am getting ISDN cause code 44
11:51.49angryusercan someone help me out ?
11:52.40angryuseri dont know where to search here, i did the pri debug, there is nothing diffrent there ;(
11:53.01*** join/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@41.55.136.178)
11:53.28bulkorokCause No. 44 - requested circuit/channel not available.
11:53.29bulkorokThis cause is returned when the circuit or channel indicated by the requesting entity cannot be provided by the other side of the interface.
11:54.55*** join/#asterisk seanbright (~sean@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/seanbright)
11:54.58angryuserbulkorok: well, so ?
11:55.38angryuserbulkorok: when i dial from console on this port it dials fine, i get this code only when my pbx dials from NT to TE port
11:56.02bulkorok'core set verbose 5' in * CL
11:56.07bulkorokI
11:57.14StaRetjiis my logic regarding #include okay folks?
11:57.15StaRetjithz
12:02.07cneb3000Don't suppose anyone has any recommendation for UK sip carriers?
12:02.27cneb3000currently making about 400k minutes of Nation calls, about 200k minutes of mobile calls.
12:02.34cneb3000nation = national
12:03.38nisamhi
12:04.49nisambulkorok:one help
12:05.03bulkoroklets see..
12:06.53nisamhelp on bluetooth: now i am able install using chan_mobile module. But i can not see /etc/asterisk/mobile.conf.
12:08.30nisamwat will be the issue..?
12:08.43bulkoroklokk at ~asterisk-sources~/configs/chan_mobile.conf.sample
12:09.09*** join/#asterisk nickfennell (~nickfenne@unaffiliated/nickfennell)
12:09.41bulkorokat least /etc/asterisk/chan_mobile.conf
12:09.58bulkorokif you issued 'make samples'
12:10.01*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~aoulton@216.191.106.162)
12:10.45nisami issued make samples
12:11.31nisamchan_mobile.conf is available
12:11.36bulkorok:)
12:13.36*** join/#asterisk StaRetji (~LittleAll@87.250.55.105)
12:14.00WIMPyangryuser: That might be an internal thing. Are the channels set up correctly in chan_dahdi.conf?
12:14.24angryuserHow come the WIMPy yes i can call on any
12:14.32angryuserWIMPy yes i can call on any
12:14.43angryuserInbound calls works fine by the way
12:14.49nisamboth are same..?
12:15.02angryuserThe come from TE > to NT port no problem, pbx anwers
12:15.46bulkoroknisam: chan_mobile.conf is for chan_mobile... i don't know if mobile.conf exists...
12:16.26WIMPyangryuser: And you have a full PRI?
12:16.27angryuserWIMPy: system.conf http://pastebin.ca/2206236
12:16.39angryuserWIMPy: yes 30 channels
12:16.57*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.215.82.210)
12:18.26angryuserWIMPy: my dialplan, there is no more simple
12:18.27angryuserhttp://pastebin.ca/2206237
12:19.31WIMPyYou might not want that extension under default, but that's a different topic.
12:19.41*** join/#asterisk tamiel (~tamiel@85-171-171-179.rev.numericable.fr)
12:19.43angryuserWIMPy: it is for console testing
12:19.57WIMPyThe interesting bit of configuration is chan_dahdi.conf.
12:20.07angryuserWIMPy: when i dial like "console dial 12316546" it works
12:20.09WIMPyYou can use an explicit context there as well.
12:20.24WIMPyBut some debug output might be better.
12:20.47*** join/#asterisk patrickximenes (~hexa@187.68.71.4)
12:20.50WIMPyThere must be some diference, obviousely.
12:21.00angryuserWIMPy: http://pastebin.ca/2206239
12:22.28angryuserWIMPy: yea, its been hours i am trying some different setups, even compared the Pri trace from console dial, and PBX dial, i dont see the difference
12:23.49WIMPyswitchtype=national? Didn't you say E1?
12:24.09WIMPyWell, it's obviousely E1.
12:24.48angryuserWIMPy: yea its national
12:25.04angryuserWIMPy: so the pri trace from console http://pastebin.ca/2206240
12:25.11angryuser(works)
12:25.15WIMPyInteresting.
12:25.19WIMPyVery interesting.
12:26.37angryuserWIMPy: pri trace from the PBX to provider http://pastebin.ca/2206243 which is not working
12:26.52WIMPyWhy (or since when) is the hex dump formatted that way?
12:26.59angryuserNote how just after SETUP message i got cause 44
12:27.13angryuser(on the second example)
12:28.15angryuserWIMPy: nationa or euroisdn changes nothing, as pridilaplan whatever options
12:28.38angryuserI can call in, PBX answers, he can not call out
12:28.50WIMPypridialplan sets the type of number.
12:29.38WIMPySpan 2 is the NT port to the PBX?
12:29.53angryuserWIMPy: the only strange stuff i've found its when i call IN (works) i got PRI Span: 1 !! Unknown IE 36 (cs6)
12:30.06angryuserBut the call is ok
12:30.16*** join/#asterisk danfromuk (~IceChat77@2.27.28.56)
12:30.19angryuserWell, any ideas ? :)
12:30.29*** part/#asterisk patrickximenes (~hexa@187.68.71.4)
12:33.02WIMPyThe only wrong thing I see so far is in the working example.
12:34.02*** part/#asterisk kresp0 (~kresp0@213.37.150.59.dyn.user.ono.com)
12:35.08angryuserWIMPy: tell me
12:35.37leifmadsenI'm building an example that uses the dialplan_exec option in the ConfBridge() dtmf triggered menus. Anyone have an example they can think of that would be a good demonstration of this function?
12:35.59*** join/#asterisk kriger (~norge@68-190-90-80.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com)
12:36.23leifmadsenIf you don't know what it does:    allows a participant of the conference bridge to leave the conference temporarily to execute some dialplan and then rejoin the conference
12:36.50WIMPyOoops
12:37.00WIMPyLook at the direction.
12:37.22WIMPyIt's Asterisk that disconnects the call immediately after trying to place it.
12:38.00leifmadsenactually just thought of a good example I think
12:38.03leifmadsenthanks anyways :
12:38.04leifmadsen:D
12:38.05WIMPyWait. How many calls are there?
12:38.14angryuserWIMPy: how come he does that ?
12:38.42angryuserWIMPy: do i need to indicate progress ?
12:39.19WIMPyWhy are the Asterisk debug outputs so horrible to read?
12:39.34WIMPyAnd why do they have so many different formats?
12:41.05WIMPyYes, Asterisk tears down the call before the remote can acknowledge it.
12:41.17WIMPyWhy it does so, I have absolutely no idea.
12:42.09leifmadsenWIMPy: because it is an organic piece of software with many participants over a large period of time, and no one has spent the time to make the output consistent.
12:42.16leifmadsenThis is pretty much the answer to any of those types of questions.
12:42.45leifmadsensame issue with the console commands until 4 of us at an AstriDevCon went through to make them consistent (for better or worse)
12:42.59StaRetjifolks, how to block calls to certain dnid (mobile phone number)? thx
12:43.04*** join/#asterisk DelphiWorld (~VoCloud@openvpn/user/DelphiWorld)
12:43.05WIMPyUnfortunately that wastes so much time.
12:43.07DelphiWorldhey all
12:43.21DelphiWorldanyone know of any good widget that's Click to cable capable?
12:43.27leifmadsenStaRetji: just add a dialplan match for those numbers and have it playback a message stating that numbers not allowed to be called
12:43.41StaRetjiis this okay? exten => xxxxxxxxxxxx,1,Hangup()
12:43.44WIMPyangryuser: I suspect there must be somethign going wrong between Asterisk and the PBX. Give us a trace from that port.
12:43.49StaRetjiwhere xxxxx is mobile phone number
12:43.51StaRetjithat leifmadsenq
12:43.53leifmadsenStaRetji: if it's a real number, yes
12:44.13leifmadsenspecific number will get matched first over a pattern match, so that is valid
12:44.22StaRetjiI get  pbx.c:8312 add_priority: Unable to register extension 'xxxxxxxxxxxx', priority 1 in 'default', already in use
12:44.34leifmadsenthen it's already been definied
12:44.37StaRetjiwhere xxxxx is that mobile number
12:44.39*** join/#asterisk ulogic (421fc7ab@gateway/web/freenode/ip.66.31.199.171)
12:44.41StaRetjii added xxx
12:44.44StaRetjiand 00xxxxx
12:44.53StaRetjithinking that maybe it wont match
12:44.54leifmadsenare you adding pattern matches, or real number?
12:44.59StaRetjireal number
12:45.03StaRetjiI added number
12:45.05leifmadsenthen you've already definied it
12:45.07StaRetjiand 00samenumber
12:45.10leifmadsendefined it*
12:45.15leifmadsenit can't be defined twice
12:45.18leifmadsenor you get that error
12:45.21StaRetjiso, number and 00number is identical?
12:45.25[TK]D-FenderNo
12:45.25leifmadsenno
12:45.38leifmadsenlook at your dialplan -- you've got a typo or something defined twice
12:45.40StaRetjioh, I understand you!! I have number twice!
12:45.43StaRetjithx!
12:45.45leifmadsenyes.....
12:46.05[TK]D-FenderStaRetji, Which is exactly what that errors says
12:47.13StaRetjiunderstood o7
12:47.14*** join/#asterisk aross42 (~aross@CPE009400809a9c-CMb89bc9d2e1a5.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
12:47.20StaRetjithx folks
12:47.47StaRetjibut do I have to do 00number and number
12:47.55StaRetjior I can just do number?
12:48.03StaRetjicause I have 123456 and 00123456
12:48.18StaRetjibecasue with both 123456 and 00123456 you can make a call
12:48.22[TK]D-FenderStaRetji, Do want 2 different patterns or not?  This is YOUR system.  What do you need to dial?
12:48.27StaRetjiso I thought I should be blocking both
12:48.33leifmadsenyou need both if you want to block both
12:48.37[TK]D-FenderStaRetji, Blocking?
12:48.42StaRetjiyep
12:48.49StaRetjiroger that
12:48.56[TK]D-FenderStaRetji, Do what you want... it's your dialplan....
12:49.34StaRetjiwill do, thx ;)
12:49.35angryuserWIMPy: sure one moment
12:53.14angryuserWIMPy: here it is http://pastebin.ca/2206253
12:54.09*** part/#asterisk deo (~dnepangue@203.177.214.75)
12:54.38*** join/#asterisk sustav (~vpp@nat/digium/x-qckpxybsznvfdmwc)
12:56.29angryuserWIMPy: i am not that good in pri traces ;'
12:56.45*** join/#asterisk serafie (~erin@nat/digium/x-joiakpssccskyivf)
13:00.11ulogicWith sippeers in a realtime database, the CLI command "sip show users" doesn't show anybody until they register.  Is that the way it is supposed to work??
13:00.23[TK]D-Fenderyes
13:01.24ulogicAlso after a sip reload, "sip show users" doesn't show anybody.
13:01.31leifmadsenulogic: yes
13:02.00leifmadsenthat's how it works -- you might want to enable rtcache in sip.conf so it keeps the peers in memory after a module reload
13:02.24ulogicI'll give that a try right now
13:04.48WIMPyangryuser: It's your PBX that rejects the channel.
13:05.03WIMPyIt it configured for a fractional PRI?
13:05.21*** join/#asterisk kresp0 (~kresp0@213.37.150.59.dyn.user.ono.com)
13:05.31WIMPyOr does it hace a configuration that only allows certain directions on certain channels?
13:06.01angryuserWIMPy: can you explain please ?
13:06.24WIMPyNo. The PBXs manual might.
13:06.26angryuserWIMPy: the thing is if i connect the provider directly it works ;(
13:06.48angryuserWIMPy: i mean where do you see that it rejects ?
13:06.58WIMPyI can only see that it is disconnection the call with "requested channel not available".
13:07.41WIMPyFrom line 122.
13:07.56ulogicsip.conf.sample only shows rtcachefriends which I set to yes and did a sip reload
13:08.10WIMPyThe disconnects goes from the PBX to Asterisk.
13:08.26WIMPy-s
13:08.42ulogicI force a phone to reregister, and it shows up in "sip show users", but after a sip reload, it still disappears
13:09.06ulogicDo I have to totally unload chan_sip.so and reload it that way?
13:10.53*** join/#asterisk xoveruk (~rich@196.200.85.125)
13:10.59xoverukhi
13:11.14xoverukplease, how do I place a call to a mobile from 'console dial'?
13:11.14ulogicActually, I just force an unload and load of chan_sip.so, but doing a sip reload still clears the users list
13:11.43*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@82-168-115-40.ip.telfort.nl)
13:12.32*** join/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-zheezhuviejvqccu)
13:12.32*** mode/#asterisk [+o mjordan] by ChanServ
13:12.45ulogicxoveruk: have you tried console dial mobile-phone-number@your-outbound-context ?
13:14.23*** join/#asterisk Jasnejac (kvirc@81.91.107.236)
13:15.09*** join/#asterisk lminiero (~lminiero@2001:760:3403:fffc:2c0:9fff:fec3:5b07)
13:15.30lminierohi there
13:16.09lminieroanybody around?
13:16.54*** join/#asterisk pabelanger (~pabelange@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/pabelanger)
13:16.54*** mode/#asterisk [+o pabelanger] by ChanServ
13:17.58xoverukulogic: with the full dialplan@context?
13:21.27xoverukulogic: I get console hangup after it dials the number
13:21.43xoverukI am using 9 for outside lines, must I use 9no@context?
13:27.24*** join/#asterisk ThomasLocke (~ThomasLoc@pdpc/supporter/active/thomaslocke)
13:27.25*** join/#asterisk patrickximenes (~hexa@189.103.81.51)
13:28.18DelphiWorldhi pabelanger
13:28.36pabelangerindeed
13:28.50DelphiWorldpabelanger: do you know any good C2C Service?
13:29.05pabelangerC2C?
13:29.41DelphiWorldpabelanger: Click to call
13:29.56pabelangerAh.  No, don't use it
13:30.32DelphiWorldnp
13:30.34cneb3000DelphiWorld: You mean something that highlights numbers in web pages and lets you click them and dial automatically?
13:30.43cneb3000I think firefox uses to have an add on that did that?
13:30.47grohneuhm. the license agreement on jira is very restrictive. I does not permit uploading a modified patch. Do I really need to upload a diff to a diff in this case?
13:30.59DelphiWorldcneb3000: yes but built-in web phone, and i want only one number to be dialed that's a sip uro
13:31.04DelphiWorlds/uro/uri/
13:31.14grohnes/I does/It does/
13:32.30DelphiWorldcneb3000: http://www.phono.com but i'm a js less person
13:32.32Kattyhello my asterisk does not work at all how to fix plz
13:32.47cneb3000DelpiWorld: I was juist going to suggest that :)
13:32.56grohneKatty: you will have to provide more details to get any help at all.
13:33.03DelphiWorldKatty: rm -Rf * ;-)
13:33.08DelphiWorldjoke
13:33.16cneb3000Katty: del c:\system32
13:33.31DelphiWorldcneb3000: format c:/q
13:33.34DelphiWorldshutdown -s
13:33.52grohneis anyone actually using libpri trunk? it seems heavily modified.
13:34.25cneb3000DelphiWorld: I cant remember its name, but I found a flash soft phone once
13:34.34cneb3000maybe that can get you started on a googling journey
13:34.41DelphiWorldcneb3000: red5?
13:34.48cneb3000ahh yes! thats it
13:34.52cneb3000long time ago though
13:34.52DelphiWorldcneb3000: you do JS?
13:35.09cneb3000hmm, i can read it, but never really written in it
13:35.59cneb3000just reading the documentation for phono though
13:36.20cneb3000do you have an API key already?
13:37.35*** join/#asterisk AkkerKid (~AkkerKid@50-200-18-202-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
13:38.50DelphiWorldcneb3000: i do
13:39.00cneb3000DelphiWorld: because there's an example on http://phono.com/docs that looks like it'll work
13:39.15DelphiWorldcneb3000: it's not easy to cleanup :-)
13:39.28cneb3000DelphiWorld: Just change phono.phone.dial("985-655-2500", { to whatever number you want to dial :p
13:39.49DelphiWorld:P
13:40.03cneb3000without testing it.. i think that will do!
13:44.15*** join/#asterisk d00gster (~doughant@bba773204.alshamil.net.ae)
13:46.07robl^What's the cleanest way to implement automated announcements?  i.e.  I want to dial an extension from a phone, asterisk will then call another extension (Overhead paging device) and play a pre-recorded message
13:48.47*** part/#asterisk nisam (~nisam@125.22.91.2)
13:50.02[TK]D-Fenderrobl^, Record file, originate the playback
13:50.39[TK]D-FenderWell .. actually yuo didn't mention having to record it in that step.... so jsut originate the playback
13:51.10robl^right.  just a series of standard announcement pre-recorded.
13:53.12robl^ohh!  I missed originate()  that does make it a lot easier.  thanks [TK]D-Fender.  I was thinking weird hacks with call files to originate
14:00.21robl^[TK]D-Fender: PERFECT!  Thanks!
14:00.34[TK]D-Fenderrobl^, You're welcome.
14:01.37robl^I really need to update things.  I still think in terms of 1.4 era.
14:05.12*** join/#asterisk rbowles (~bb@75-147-63-201-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
14:13.12*** join/#asterisk fisted (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
14:13.45*** join/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@197.173.185.150)
14:22.41*** part/#asterisk xoveruk (~rich@196.200.85.125)
14:23.09grohnewdoekes: so I attached an updated patch to PRI-106.
14:23.34grohnewdoekes: how about more intrusive changes to pri. is the trunk version to be released any time soon?
14:23.46*** join/#asterisk mintos (mvaliyav@nat/redhat/x-vlznodwfqijtzwwr)
14:25.40*** join/#asterisk sustav (~vpp@nat/digium/x-kepbdjfgiqjfgamb)
14:34.03*** join/#asterisk tris (tristan@camel.ethereal.net)
14:36.41*** join/#asterisk felipealmeida (~user@mvx-187-16-79-187.mundivox.com)
14:36.52wdoekestrunk become 11 very recently, so no
14:37.36*** join/#asterisk anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@189-25-113-42.user.veloxzone.com.br)
14:38.23wdoekesnm, that's asterisk. I know nothing about libpri
14:39.41*** join/#asterisk patrickximenes (~hexa@189.103.81.51)
14:39.59*** part/#asterisk StaRetji (~LittleAll@87.250.55.105)
14:41.36*** join/#asterisk tamiel (~tamiel@85-171-171-179.rev.numericable.fr)
14:43.16*** join/#asterisk grohne (~grohne@vortex.stw-bonn.de)
14:43.24*** join/#asterisk nisam (~nisam@125.22.91.2)
14:43.34grohnewdoekes: sorry, I got disconnected. can you repeat?
14:45.05*** join/#asterisk neurosys (~neurosys@173-9-159-177-miami.txt.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
14:46.14kukuI'm trying to do chanspy with just using the sip extension ( without the channel ) it works 80% of the time, the other 10% it doesn't and the other 10% it connects to an entirely different extension... any advice ?
14:46.34WIMPygrohne: The issue is of a much more general nature and can probably be found in many to most implementations.
14:46.55WIMPyIt affects most IEs including caller IDs.
14:47.06grohneWIMPy: indeed.
14:47.19*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
14:48.47[TK]D-Fenderkuku, "sip extension" is not a meaningful term.  Show us debug of the actual failure
14:51.02*** join/#asterisk DaveCanoe (~Dave@2001:1928:0:ffff::2)
14:51.23wdoekesgrohne: that I know nothing about the release cycle of libpri
14:52.06nisamhi
14:52.23nisamwhich is the best sip trunk provider in india
14:52.55grohneWIMPy: so I have some patches that attach lengths to party_numbers
14:53.19grohneWIMPy: i just wonder whether it makes any sense to publish them, since they target 1.4.12, but this seems mostly like a stable release
14:53.25*** join/#asterisk jrod (jrod@2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe93:649a)
14:53.43WIMPyAh, nice.
14:53.53grohnejust should I base them on 1.4.12 or trunk?
14:54.23grohnein any case it *will* severly break api
14:54.26WIMPyGI guess you're better off to do them against trunk.
14:54.43WIMPyBut if it's not too much work, you could just do both.
14:55.02grohneit is basically duplicating the work, since the diff stable..trunk is huge
14:55.42grohnetrunk looks like a rewrite.
14:55.50WIMPyAn API change will certainly not go in to anything but trunk.
14:56.01grohnei certainly agree
14:56.05WIMPyI haven't looked that deep.
14:56.22WIMPyIn fact I try to avoid libpri now.
14:56.22grohnethis is why I retained api in my patch to PRI-106
14:57.05grohneso is there something else providing similar functionality?
14:57.36WIMPymISDNuser
14:58.44grohnethanks. I'll have a look
14:58.48WIMPyAnd yes, I'd be ery astounded if the same bug didn't exist there,
14:58.53WIMPyvery
15:00.09grohnecan you point me to the component implementing q931 in misdnuser?
15:00.24AkkerKidGood day everyone!  If I wanted to build a script where you could dial the last two numbers of an extension that had the same first 3 numbers of your own and it would ring the full 5 digit extensions for you, how would I do it?
15:01.47*** join/#asterisk anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm)
15:02.07WIMPygrohne: lib/layer3
15:02.13grohnethanks.
15:02.16*** join/#asterisk learath (47f6db23@gateway/web/freenode/ip.71.246.219.35)
15:02.59[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, give us an example number....
15:03.24AkkerKidI'm at exten 12345 and I want to dial 12399 by only hitt digits 99
15:03.42grohneWIMPy: so at least mi_decode_calling_nr preserves length. which is more than libpri does.
15:04.01[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, then make and exten to match 2 digits and shove the 123 in your Dial()
15:04.14jeffspeffyep, that would work
15:04.39grohneWIMPy: wait. it doesn't. it just copies everything necessary. :-(
15:04.56carrarexten => _XX/300XX,1,Dial(SIP/300${EXTEN},100)
15:04.58AkkerKidthe hard part for me is setting it up so using the same script, someone with ext 12445 and dial 12499 aswell with only 99
15:05.04carrarsomething like that
15:05.27[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, You can't do both patterns in one.
15:05.50carrarexten => _XX/_300XX,1,Dial(SIP/300${EXTEN},100)
15:05.57[TK]D-Fendercarrar, And close ... as abstractions go....
15:06.01carrarheh
15:06.36carrarAkkerKid, just write a simple AGI
15:06.37AkkerKidthere's no way to get the first three digits of the source extensions and the two digits dialed to create the destination extension?
15:07.20AkkerKidThe idea is that a branch office can call their local extensions withour dial the full 5 digits
15:07.28*** join/#asterisk mintos (mvaliyav@nat/redhat/x-uvyevcbvzvtryuai)
15:07.33carraror just a do a if on comapir of the first 3 digits
15:07.35WIMPygrohne: I guess that's what you will find almost everywhere :-(
15:07.40*** part/#asterisk jrod (jrod@2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe93:649a)
15:07.43*** part/#asterisk nisam (~nisam@125.22.91.2)
15:07.56carrarof both the caller id and exten
15:08.32carrarthem pop those 3 diigts into a var
15:08.52carrarsend to same 2 digit extension with the var in front of it
15:08.58carrarBING
15:08.59carrarBAMG
15:09.01grohneWIMPy: hmm. ok. anyway I probably cannot use misdn with this hardware.
15:09.12carrarOPPAN GANGNAM STYLE !!!!!!!!!
15:09.16[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, First not call your calling device an "extension".  If you configured the CALLERID of the SIP DEVICE to match some arbitrary extension (extens = line in extensions.conf) then you can use that.
15:09.39WIMPygrohne: What hardware?
15:09.42[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, So if the callerid of the calling phone holds it, then take that instead of a fixed prefix.
15:09.59WIMPyAnd yes, it has many limitations, like DSS1 only.
15:10.08grohneWIMPy: mostly junghans bris and pris
15:10.35WIMPygrohne: Sure they work with mISDN. Anything HFC based does.
15:10.42WIMPyIncluding USB dongles.
15:11.07nilujefile: I'm answering here to avoid pollution on the dev channel
15:11.13WIMPyThe real limitation ATM are not in misdn, however, but in LCR.
15:11.15fileniluje, thanks
15:11.26fileniluje, that was the mailing list post that mjordan was referring to
15:11.30nilujeactually, the functionality I need to implement is this one: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-19571
15:11.40grohnehm. ok. on the other hand I am already working with dahdi and libpri. and misidn doesn't fix the "bugs" I am currently working on. switching seems more like a risk than a gain
15:11.57AkkerKidAlright, thanks all.  I've got to figure how to get the source's channel variables out of freepbx parsable...  or something...
15:12.03nilujeit works fine, the problem is there are memory leaks introduced with the patch - I did not constat them, I've been told so
15:12.32nilujethe patch seemed to be complicated for what it does, so I thought there would be a simpler way to play a sound
15:12.32mjordanthere's a lot more than just memory leaks that that patch will introduce
15:12.40[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, I just gave you something very specific to consider.  IS it the same number you are looking for?
15:12.43mjordanrace conditions galore
15:12.51nilujemjordan: right, I read the comments ;p
15:13.06grohneWIMPy: thanks for your insight
15:13.35AkkerKid[TK]D-Fender: I'm looking into what FreePBX is setting for that.  Thanks!
15:13.51[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, You shouldn't have to look.  This is something you should immediately know.
15:13.59AkkerKidMy second problem is that I'm programing under Elastix/FreePBX
15:16.07[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, And you keep adding extra facts that aren't answering the question....
15:16.44WIMPygrohne: Possible. Sure. I don't know what your needs are, so I cant give a recommendation anyway.
15:17.12*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@cpe-66-74-182-202.socal.res.rr.com)
15:17.52*** join/#asterisk webguynow (~webguynow@c-24-1-222-204.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
15:18.49AkkerKid[TK]D-Fender: You're losing me.  Am I going the wrong direction?
15:19.04[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, What did I ask you?
15:19.30*** join/#asterisk sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell)
15:19.30*** mode/#asterisk [+o sruffell] by ChanServ
15:20.21AkkerKidHonestly, I'm not sure.
15:21.58AkkerKidbut the direction I'm going is this  exten => _#xx,1,Dial(${something}${EXTEN:-2,2})
15:22.17AkkerKidwithout the opund once i'm out of testing of course.
15:22.30AkkerKidpound*
15:23.24AkkerKidthe something is somehow populated with the first three digits of the extensions associated with the caller's device
15:24.44*** join/#asterisk Faustov (user@gentoo/user/faustov)
15:26.29[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, I asked you if the SIP DEVICE that was placing the call had a CALLER ID that matched the "extension" that was related to it.
15:26.48AkkerKidI believe it does not.
15:28.39*** join/#asterisk j4m3s_ (~j4m3s_@adsl-98-81-32-194.hsv.bellsouth.net)
15:31.37[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, So when you dial from that phone the number the person you call is seeing is NOT the same as the 5 digit "extension" they would dial from their phone to call it back?
15:32.16*** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it)
15:32.28AkkerKidI suppose internally, it does but externally it doesn't so it should work for my purposes.
15:32.49[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, You are now being even more vague about some implication of intern VS external.
15:32.51AkkerKidthis is what i've got now...
15:32.53AkkerKidDial(${CHANNEL:4:2}${EXTEN:-2,2})
15:33.12[TK]D-FenderAkkerKid, I asked a very simple question....
15:33.14AkkerKidsorry, Dial(${CHANNEL:4:3}${EXTEN:-2,2})
15:33.17[TK]D-Fenderthere is no "maybe about it.
15:33.30[TK]D-Fenderwe are talking about a SIP device registered to a single server.
15:33.35[TK]D-FenderI asked about the CALLING phone.
15:34.05AkkerKidthen as far as we're concerned, yes.
15:34.26[TK]D-Fender[11:09] <[TK]D-Fender> AkkerKid, First not call your calling device an "extension".  If you configured the CALLERID of the SIP DEVICE to match some arbitrary extension (extens = line in extensions.conf) then you
15:34.43[TK]D-Fender[11:09] <[TK]D-Fender> AkkerKid, So if the callerid of the calling phone holds it, then take that instead of a fixed prefix.
15:35.43*** join/#asterisk jpsharp (jsharp@ohno.mrbill.net)
15:36.19AkkerKidunderstood.
15:36.56*** join/#asterisk darkbasic (~quassel@niko.linuxsystems.it)
15:39.18*** join/#asterisk Nemus (~Nemus@c-76-27-99-15.hsd1.ut.comcast.net)
15:40.34*** join/#asterisk navaismo (~navaismo@189.144.58.34)
15:53.19*** join/#asterisk cneb3000 (~cneb3000@b01977b3.bb.sky.com)
15:55.13*** join/#asterisk sustav (~vpp@nat/digium/x-xkvieiqpyaslxxfv)
15:56.21AkkerKidI've got it working.  Thanks for your help [TK]D-Fender!  exten => _#xx,1,Goto(from-internal,${CALLERID(number):0:-2}${EXTEN:-2},1)
15:59.15*** join/#asterisk MLNoah (~MLNoah@noc.metalink.net)
15:59.38*** join/#asterisk cusco (~tralala@a79-168-182-209.cpe.netcabo.pt)
16:08.50*** join/#asterisk moy (~moy@173.239.155.74)
16:19.22*** join/#asterisk NightMonkey (~NightrMon@pdpc/supporter/professional/nightmonkey)
16:21.54*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.212.120.182)
16:22.56ChannelZI think CALLERID(number) is deprecated, use CALLERID(num)
16:26.48*** join/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@197.173.185.150)
16:26.50carrarso sad
16:32.25*** part/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-zheezhuviejvqccu)
16:36.24*** join/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@197.173.185.150)
16:49.45leifmadsenCALLERID(number) and (num) are the same thing and I've never heard of either being deprecated
17:00.50ChannelZmy bad then, I thought it was going/had gone away
17:01.44ChannelZit's certainly not listed in the function help.  But maybe I'm thinking of the old channel variables or something
17:02.18*** join/#asterisk jsjc (~Adium@27.Red-2-137-30.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net)
17:03.05jeffspeffwhat's a good way to secure a sip based * with lots of remote users that work from their homes that have dynamic IP addresses?
17:05.55*** join/#asterisk j4m3s__ (~j4m3s_@adsl-98-81-85-124.hsv.bellsouth.net)
17:08.20[TK]D-FenderStrong passwords, and a firewall strategy (fail2ban, port knocking, other login), or VPN, etc.
17:11.22*** join/#asterisk jsjc (~Adium@138.Red-83-56-193.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net)
17:15.15jeffspeffusing strong passwords, firewall has to be open for SIP because i never know what network or IP a legitimate user will be registering from... the Polycom phones (IP330, 335, and 340) don't support VPN like the Cisco SPA's do.
17:17.04*** join/#asterisk brdude (~brdude@12.155.183.30)
17:17.04*** part/#asterisk sbszulu (~Sibusiso_@197.173.185.150)
17:17.08[TK]D-Fenderjeffspeff, There is a question about starting open and then CLOSING OFF attackers
17:18.14jeffspeff[TK]D-Fender, what do you mean by "closing off" ?
17:19.02jeffspeffI monitor the system as much as possible and block the IP's of networks I see that are spamming AND not located in the US. but that only limits it to attacks from outside the US
17:19.29*** join/#asterisk mchou (~quassel@unaffiliated/mchou)
17:25.05*** join/#asterisk fisted (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
17:30.29*** join/#asterisk j4m3s__ (~j4m3s_@adsl-98-81-34-31.hsv.bellsouth.net)
17:31.54Qwellj4m3s_: ohai
17:33.25*** join/#asterisk j4m3s___ (~j4m3s_@adsl-98-81-90-238.hsv.bellsouth.net)
17:41.55[TK]D-Fenderjeffspeff, You should already have been Googling "fail2ban" and have come up with that answer.....
17:43.48jeffspeff[TK]D-Fender, but how accurate is that?
17:44.16[TK]D-Fenderjeffspeff, How accurate is what?
17:45.51jeffspeffi don't see how it can explicity secure the system... it'd be good for catching brute force hacks and others of the like
17:46.36[TK]D-Fenderjeffspeff, And what would qualify as "explicit"?
17:46.52jeffspeffidealy i would like to set a host ip for each sip user, but as they have dynamic IP's i can't.
17:47.10[TK]D-Fenderjeffspeff, what that's one way ... of NOT answering the question....
17:47.33[TK]D-Fenderwell*
17:49.00jeffspeffexplicit as in only these group of IP's are allowed to access the server, or IP 192.168.1.1 is the only one allowed to connect to extension/sip user 1234
17:51.09[TK]D-Fenderjeffspeff, Yes and you've already shot down being able to just enter those flat-out
17:51.17[TK]D-FenderSo it isn't viable.  So this ISN'T an option.
17:51.43[TK]D-FenderSo what process can you possibly imagine that can be explicit when they can connect from ANYWHERE?
17:51.49jeffspeffright, so I'm trying to explore other alternatives to provide equivelant protection
17:51.59[TK]D-FenderYou can't HAVE equivalent
17:52.10[TK]D-FenderThe situations are not the same.
17:52.33[TK]D-FenderI want to be as safe from falling while in a plane as I am when I'm sitting on the ground.
17:52.36[TK]D-FenderNOT POSSIBLE.
17:53.48[TK]D-FenderSo you have to do something else
18:03.17*** join/#asterisk sustav (~vpp@nat/digium/x-vwjwuahuwiduvtzz)
18:18.38*** join/#asterisk j4m3s_ (~j4m3s_@adsl-98-81-78-23.hsv.bellsouth.net)
18:21.13*** join/#asterisk docgnome (~docgnome@2604:9a00:2100:a010:9::12c)
18:25.14*** join/#asterisk TimeRider (~steve@188-220-34-144.dsl.cnl.uk.net)
18:30.18*** join/#asterisk gusto (~gusto@2001:a60:11ff:1200::42:4)
18:36.52*** join/#asterisk corretico (~luis@190.211.93.11)
18:38.24*** join/#asterisk corretico (~luis@190.211.93.11)
18:38.29*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.212.120.182)
18:42.07*** join/#asterisk corretico (~luis@190.211.93.11)
18:42.28*** join/#asterisk fisted_ (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
19:03.39*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@ip70-181-154-104.sd.sd.cox.net)
19:08.58*** join/#asterisk malcolmd (~malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd)
19:08.59*** mode/#asterisk [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ
19:12.17*** join/#asterisk morfin (~morfin@morfin.telenet.ru)
19:12.20morfinhello
19:12.52morfinis that possible to move CDR data from MySQL to PostgreSQL without losing data?
19:15.09*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.212.120.182)
19:15.12Qwellmorfin: sure
19:16.03morfini need that because i don't think storing that in MySQL is good idea actually
19:17.39QwellWhat's wrong with MySQL?
19:18.42drmessanoThe Internet + Oracle + Slashdot
19:28.41morfinactually nothing
19:29.02morfinbut i have projects on PostgreSQL that should use CDR
19:29.31morfinand i think it would be much better if i'll have data on PostgreSQL
19:30.43robl^if one insists on MySQL, at least check out MariaDB
19:30.48*** join/#asterisk leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
19:30.48*** mode/#asterisk [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ
19:33.03TechSmurfbashes his head
19:33.27TechSmurfMy *now box has decided not to play ringing() when I call it
19:33.32TechSmurfwtf?
19:35.10*** join/#asterisk d00gster (~doughant@173.195.1.109)
19:38.22TechSmurfit did it once after a reboot... now it's stopped again
19:40.05*** join/#asterisk MLNoah (~MLNoah@noc.metalink.net)
19:40.13TechSmurfif I tell it to play MOH instead of ringing it works
19:44.31[TK]D-FenderTechSmurf, Where's the debug?
19:45.40TechSmurfI'm fried after all the shit I've tried to fix today. Please treat me like a noob
19:46.10TechSmurf(sans usual noob insults, preferrably)
19:47.28[TK]D-FenderTechSmurf, Where's the debug? <-
19:47.32TechSmurfWhat debug?
19:47.42[TK]D-FenderShow us us evidence of the problem.
19:47.43TechSmurfI don't know how to get what you call a debug
19:47.45[TK]D-FenderShow us the cal.
19:47.52TechSmurfI don't know what you even mean
19:47.52[TK]D-FenderShow us configs.Tell use what version of *.
19:48.02TechSmurf2.0.2 i believe
19:48.09[TK]D-FenderThat is not an Asterisk version #
19:48.18TechSmurfsry. as I said, fried
19:48.44[TK]D-FenderYuo appear to be beyond any semblance of a clue.  Take a break an come back when you're capable of processing things...
19:48.52TechSmurfI can't
19:48.53[TK]D-FenderYou'll burn us out along with you otherwise
19:49.07TechSmurfI have to fix this stupid thing. but ok, I'll just do it myself
19:52.44*** join/#asterisk leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
19:52.44*** mode/#asterisk [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ
20:06.35TechSmurflaughs
20:06.42TechSmurf(insanely)
20:07.28TechSmurfdestination == extension, no ring tones. ring group, no ring tones. terminate call -> play ringtones until caller hangs up, I get ring tones.
20:07.35Sprocksif I use a DNS for "host=" in my sip.conf will that cause problems?
20:07.47TechSmurfSprocks: so long as dns works, no
20:10.14Sprocksok so as long as I keep it pointing to the ip of the machine in question I should have no problems
20:10.28TechSmurfas far as I've experienced.
20:10.56TechSmurfif the machine's ip won't be changing, though, I'd consider it one more thing to possibly go wrong
20:12.17TechSmurf[TK]D-Fender: what levels of verbose and debug do you expect would best highlight such a problem?
20:13.06[TK]D-FenderTechSmurf, Everything maxxed clearly.  Details of what is actually going on.  We know nothing at all right now.
20:13.22TechSmurfok. max 7?
20:16.07TechSmurfshakes his head
20:17.29*** join/#asterisk beardy (~beardy@unaffiliated/beardy)
20:17.53TechSmurfit didn't like 'core set debug maxxed'
20:18.03AkkerKidLOL
20:18.34TechSmurfI was having a hard time coming up with a more polite way to get my point across.
20:19.01TechSmurfI shouldn't have to go google wtf maximum debug is when he could have "clearly" said a fucking arabic numeral.
20:19.19*** join/#asterisk jkroon (~jkroon@dsl-244-21-47.telkomadsl.co.za)
20:19.34AkkerKidD-Fender had to deal with me earlier. He's not in a great mood.
20:19.57TechSmurfheh
20:20.32TechSmurfbeats Qwell with a deadly tuna.
20:20.49jkroonhi guys, when using call origination it seems the translation paths end up being sub-optimal (asterisk 1.8.12.1 and 1.8.15.1 confirmed).  in particular even though both SIP channels of the resulting bridge uses g729 asterisk ends up using 2 g729 encoders and decoders ... this doesn't seem right.
20:21.21jkroondoes anyone perhaps know why this happens and possibly how to avoid it? (ie, get it to function in pass-through mode)
20:21.36AkkerKidjk: codec from digium?
20:21.43jkroonyes
20:21.47AkkerKidare you recording anything?
20:21.52AkkerKidmixmon?
20:22.09[TK]D-FenderThat would do it
20:22.12jkroonAkkerKid, with and without recording it happens.  with recording it's two encoders and four decoders, using monitor
20:22.19jkroonwithout recording it's 2/2
20:22.50jkroonin both cases it should be 0/0 if i'm not mistaken
20:23.00AkkerKidThis issue has surpassed my Level of tech support.  Allow me to forward you to level 2 service.  Please hold.
20:23.10jkroonrofl
20:23.26jkroon[TK]D-Fender, any bets?
20:23.34jkroonpointers at how to debug?
20:23.39AkkerKidif you're recording, asterisk will have to translate both directions of audio into your recording format
20:24.21*** join/#asterisk niluje (~niluje@82.227.67.242)
20:24.38jkroonAkkerKid, agreed, but I'd expect it to use 2 decoders and 1 encoder with mixmonitor, not 2 encoders and 4 decoders.
20:25.22TechSmurfWhat is the log supposed to say when it starts playing the default ringing tone back to the caller?
20:25.24jkroonwith monitor (not mixmonitor) i expect to see 0/0 since it just copies the raw streams to files (permitting the codecs are the same as the channels)
20:25.33[TK]D-FenderWhat is monitor without recording?
20:25.46AkkerKid{channel} is ringing ?
20:26.04*** join/#asterisk mchou (~quassel@unaffiliated/mchou)
20:26.29[TK]D-Fenderjkroon, Incorrect.
20:26.41jkroon[TK]D-Fender, there are two mechanisms for recording, Monitor() and MixMonitor(), MixMonitor mixes in real-time and is generally considered better from the most documentation.
20:26.45jkroon[TK]D-Fender, please explain ?
20:26.49[TK]D-Fenderjkroon, Monitor ercords in a FORMAT.  the file it says could be in something OTHER than the call.
20:27.19[TK]D-Fenderjkroon, Have an end-to-end G.729 call?  TFB when when you save as **wav**
20:27.23jkroon[TK]D-Fender, that's why I said permitting the ... nm, codecs vs format, ok, permitting the FORMAT is the same as the channels.
20:27.37[TK]D-Fenderjkroon, Not the channels.. the RECORDING FILE FORMAT
20:28.04jkroonno, end-to-end G.729, with MixMonitor to G.729 => 2 decoders, 1 encoder, same, but with Monitor usually gets met 0/0.
20:28.22[TK]D-FenderMix monitor = TRANSCODE 100% of the time
20:28.41jkroon[TK]D-Fender, ok, but I see 2/2 even without either of Monitor or MixMonitor.
20:28.42[TK]D-FenderBecause mixing requies decodeing , mix, re-encode
20:28.50[TK]D-Fenderjkroon, Show us the calls.
20:29.08jkroonverbosity?
20:29.12jkroon4 sufficient?
20:29.16[TK]D-Fendercollect that up, I'm heading home.  Back in 20ish
20:30.00TechSmurfstabs d-fender
20:31.40AkkerKida little murder never killed anyone...
20:32.55jkroonrofl
20:33.22TechSmurfreaches critical mass and obliterates freenode entirely.
20:33.27drmessanoFunny that everyone wants his help, but they talk about him behind his back and complain about his methods
20:33.43TechSmurfactually, I'm pretty much done with his help for tday
20:33.48TechSmurfhe's as burned out as I am...
20:33.55TechSmurfwe probably would kill each other.
20:34.45TechSmurfputs the keyboard down and goes to find a few minutes of zen before he goes back to googling.
20:35.43*** join/#asterisk sustav_ (~vpp@nat/digium/x-whpcrbhgtdtthmrh)
20:36.44AkkerKidI can't understand being grumpy.  If I spend a bunch of time trying to wring information out of inquisitive people without being paid, i'd be grumpy too.
20:36.57AkkerKidi can understand*
20:37.54*** join/#asterisk Cain (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
20:39.15jkroondrmessano, not funny at all actually.
20:40.38drmessanojkroon, indeed
20:42.04jkroonok, i've got a theory but it's wack.
20:42.49jkroonmy call origination uses Local/ext@aanswer so as to manipulate things a bit before I issue Dial(), now it seems that the Local/ channel uses "ulaw", so at that stage it transcodes ..,
20:43.33jkroonnow it dials out to another SIP/ or IAX2/ channel, which ends up being g729, as soon as it gets bridged the Local/ channel gets optimized away, but the transcoding remains ... ?!?
20:44.57*** join/#asterisk tompaw (~tompaw@93.159.144.165)
20:46.22TechSmurfAkkerKid: I actively opped for efnet #linuxhelp for years. grumpy just happens :)
20:47.38TechSmurfshould go ban some people.. that always made him feel better
20:48.16jkroonAkkerKid, imagine never being left alone ... as in ever.  whenever you're online, people want your knowledge.  half the time being ungrateful for that help, being demanding as hell and insisting that you owe them support.  i'd get a little more than just grumpy.
20:48.46TechSmurfjkroon: It's actually quite easy to ignore.
20:49.13drmessanoBut he doesn't
20:49.20jkroonprobably, but still
20:49.33TechSmurfI mean, you have to *really* ignore it tho
20:49.46TechSmurfbecause once you're invested in fixing someone's problem...
20:49.59jkroonjip.
20:50.17TechSmurfheaven help that guy you throw ideas at for 20 minutes who quits irc without saying whether it worked or a thanks
20:50.36jkroonand it's not always possible, and then people really go like "but wtf?!?  you said you'd help"
20:50.41jkroonooh yea, that's annoying.
20:51.10TechSmurfI'm the bastard crafting a shitlist entry in response to that one.
20:51.19sruffell…let's not forget that on the mailing lists as well….questions …answers…..then nothing...
20:51.23TechSmurfcome back. ask another question. see what happens
20:51.24drmessanoHe helps everyone, regardless of how helpless and useless they are.  That's the real issue.  If you can't be slightly empowered to follow directions and generally act like a useless twit, you earn being labeled a useless twit.  If you hang in there for two hours helping the useless twit, you earn being able to apply the label.
20:51.35TechSmurfsruffell: I couldn't do mailing list support.
20:51.41TechSmurfI'd go batty
20:51.49sruffellbtw, who are we talking about (can't follow IRC)
20:51.51sruffell?
20:52.12TechSmurffender.. but it seems to have digressed to all of our support gripes
20:52.21sruffellheh
20:52.24*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@64.235.218.194)
20:52.31jkroontiming ...
20:52.33drmessanoSHHHH.. he's back
20:52.35TechSmurfright?
20:52.43TechSmurfwanders back into his time-out corner
20:52.53jkroonwb [TK]D-Fender
20:52.55sruffellI like to make sure mailing list threads are accurate since they get picked up by google. I figure trying to help people on the mailing lists has a good chance of preventing the next question from ever being asked.
20:53.00jkroonalmost ready with a pastebin for you
20:53.12*** join/#asterisk evil_gordita (robert@ip70-188-50-186.rn.hr.cox.net)
20:53.23sruffellbut…there is only a really small subset of things that I can help people with anyway…so I'm not going batty.
20:53.32jkroonsruffell, that's a good aim :)
20:53.34TechSmurfI think I'll just nuke my pbx next time I get physical access
20:53.47jkroonno no no
20:53.51TechSmurfdumbest issue I've ever tried to chase down
20:54.01jkroonno nukes ... we probably want the city around it still :p
20:54.14TechSmurfit's ok
20:54.17jkroonTechSmurf, what're you stuck on? (can't guarantee help)
20:54.19AkkerKidsocial selection
20:54.19TechSmurfThe box is in reno
20:54.20drmessanoThe more data we have indexed the less people use it.  The problem is that there's so much data out there, and people hold their time in such a high regard, they refuse to follow a link that may not necessarily apply to their issue.
20:54.29TechSmurfI'll just drive it down to the NTS first.
20:54.37TechSmurfnobody will notice
20:54.53*** join/#asterisk Tom_123 (~b0ot002@cpe-69-207-81-7.rochester.res.rr.com)
20:55.12Tom_123I don't really have a good concept of DID in the voip world
20:55.19TechSmurfjkroon: It stopped playing ring tones back to callers
20:55.24Tom_123wouldn't all voip by default really be supporting DID?
20:55.25drmessanoYou tell someone to google for some specific term, and they can't be bothered filtering search results.. They want YOU to be their Lucky button.
20:55.33TechSmurfTom_123: yes
20:55.34jkroonTechSmurf, channel tech?
20:55.47WIMPyTom_123: I'd say the opposite.
20:56.01WIMPyBut that may (as usual) depend on the definition used.
20:56.11jkrooni had some interesting stuff with 180 Ringing vs 183 Progress on SIP ...
20:56.34TechSmurfhrm
20:56.35sruffelldrmessano: heh..yeah….and those people I have to just ignore *unless* they are polluting the Google cache with just plain wrong informatin.
20:56.42TechSmurfthere's something I hadn't pondered
20:56.52TechSmurfis the ring coming from my pbx or the remote pbx
20:57.15jkroonwell, enjoy the sniffing :)
20:57.31TechSmurfoh wait, I did ponder that
20:57.48TechSmurfI called from my cell, still no ring tone
20:58.00TechSmurfall the handsets in the office ring just fine
20:58.09TechSmurfbut the caller gets dead air till it's answered
20:58.25anonymouz666sruffell: do you recommend to always use irqbalance?
20:58.33TechSmurfif I switch the route destination to "play ringtones until caller hangs up", it does that.
20:58.51TechSmurfif I switch the announce from ring to any MOH, that works too
20:59.41TechSmurfand I can't see a single bloody thing in the logs
20:59.47WIMPyanonymouz666: In a hopeless situation I found out that dahdi can work better with only one CPU.
20:59.58TechSmurfall it talks about is the ringing the sip handsets
21:00.18anonymouz666what do you mean by "hopeless situation"?
21:00.38WIMPyFar too little CPU for SWEC.
21:00.41TechSmurfjkroon: and after rebooting the pbx, it works correctly once.
21:01.47jkroonTechSmurf, now that sounds like one of those nuke-worthy issues.
21:01.52TechSmurfright?
21:01.53anonymouz666heh... I always with lots of CPUs
21:02.01anonymouz666I am
21:02.13anonymouz666at least 4
21:02.26WIMPyYes, but I go a little further with only one instead of two.
21:02.28TechSmurfnot my ideal answer, but chasing down this snafu is like running a marathon for a diet coke.
21:02.28jkroonWIMPy, too little cpu for swec?
21:02.42WIMPyyes
21:02.44jkroonok, so internally SIP to SIP everything is OK?
21:02.52TechSmurfyep
21:03.05jkroonbut when you come in from some external source no ringing on the "external" side?
21:03.13TechSmurfyep
21:03.39jkroonhmm, for interests sake, what happens if you put a Progress() somewhere on the incoming path forcing the local asterisk to generate ringing?
21:03.44TechSmurfexternally via iax trunk no issue either
21:03.57jkroonso only from dahdi?
21:04.14TechSmurfthird party sip provider
21:04.22jkroonis indications.conf set up correctly?
21:04.41TechSmurfafaik. I've never touched it and everything works with our old sip provider
21:04.47jkroonok, try forcing local indications ... perhaps they don't deal correctly with receiving a simple 180 ...
21:05.15TechSmurfwould the "play ring tones until caller hangs up" black hole do that itself?
21:05.45[TK]D-Fendersees we are still firmly in MaybeLand
21:05.56jkroon[TK]D-Fender, always :)
21:06.10jkroonTechSmurf, try generating it yourself by using Progress().
21:06.24[TK]D-FenderA notable suburb of GuessVille
21:08.35*** join/#asterisk citywok (~citywok@67-134-194-33.dia.static.qwest.net)
21:08.43*** join/#asterisk Galen (~Galen@rrcs-24-43-17-235.west.biz.rr.com)
21:10.19jkroon[TK]D-Fender, http://pastebin.com/Pw00r6z1 - two examples
21:10.54jkroonfirst is without any recording, SIP and IAX/2 channels, both g729, so should just function in pass-through, but ends up using 2/2 indicating that it's transcoding.
21:11.52jkroonmy theory currently is that because I originate via a Local channel initially for some reason it decides to transcode via ulaw
21:12.14jkroonany suggestions to get me a little further along?
21:13.33[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: first call had NO monitoring in it that I could see
21:13.51[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: And I dont see SIP DEBUG for the first leg of the call.
21:14.25jkroon[TK]D-Fender, that's the point ... no monitoring - why is it using up codecs?
21:14.31jkroonadds the sip debug
21:16.03jkroonhttp://pastebin.com/qjX56mA1
21:16.36jkroonwonders why pastebin's of * dialplan code always seems to trigger a captcha ...
21:17.48jkroonhmm, is that snom even allowed to respond directly with 180 ringing instead of 100 trying?
21:19.31wdoekes100 trying is not mandatory
21:19.53jkroonwdoekes, ok, so i learn something ... thanks.
21:19.59wdoekes200 directly is ok too, as long as it's quick enough
21:20.28jkroonvery interesting ... so any response to an INVITE is really OK as long as it's quick enough then I'm guessing?
21:20.59wdoekesthe 100 is there so the uac doesn't have to guess whether the packet is lost
21:21.09jkroonmakes sense
21:23.34*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
21:25.09[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: Ok, I don't see anything in there that should require transcoding..... what version of * is this?
21:26.51jkroon1.8.15.0, tried 1.8.15.1 and 1.8.12.1 as well (other machines, same dialplan)
21:27.55[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: I'm wondering if the Local channel in the middle is involved in some way.  Do a test with a direct dial between them
21:28.10jkroonseen some odd behaviour with * "losing" translation paths too off recently, requiring a restart to get things working again ... may or may not be related, haven't had time to debug that either
21:29.04jkroongive me a few minutes, will need to reconfigure the phone to auto-answer ...
21:34.53TechSmurfhrm
21:37.39*** join/#asterisk crienzo (~crienzo@66-87-124-155.pools.spcsdns.net)
21:37.50jkroon[TK]D-Fender, ok, originate SIP/102 application Dial IAX2/ulsvoip-uls/0845158255: http://pastebin.com/TDeQK0dv - works as expected.
21:38.10[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: No, no originate.. direct calls
21:38.41jkroonok, don't have physical access to the phones, but they work as expected, no transcoding.
21:39.02TechSmurfwell, it's definitely sending 180 back to the third party provider
21:39.08jkroonthis only happens when I originate the calls via the Local/ channels.
21:39.21jkroonTechSmurf, i'm telling you, try using Progress to generate the ringing locally.
21:39.55[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: Try using the /n suffix on those Local channel dials
21:40.07jkroonok, one second.
21:40.13*** join/#asterisk dijib (~dijib@208-96-84-35.eastlink.ca)
21:48.03*** part/#asterisk kresp0 (~kresp0@213.37.150.59.dyn.user.ono.com)
21:48.09jkroon[TK]D-Fender, as per request: http://pastebin.com/fKJ9zZH2
21:50.47jkroonsame result really as far as I can tell, not sure what you were hoping to learn?
21:51.49*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.212.120.182)
21:52.08jkroonexcept in this case it would actually make sense to use 2 encoders+decoders if the Local channel runs on something other than g729.
21:52.10[TK]D-FenderWondering if the way Local's bridge back on answer is interfering with it and forcing it through slin, etc
21:52.33[TK]D-Fenderbecause the Local layer is really the only differnce from the dirct one
21:53.27TechSmurfjkroon: Unfortunately I'm doing an excessive amount of googling to try to turn that into english
21:54.01jkroonok, i'm reasonably sure that you're correct, in that if I originate SIP/102 directly into from-phone I don't see the behaviour, and the only logical conclusion that I can make is that somehow just having Local/ involved is causing the transcode to happen.
21:54.23jkroonperhaps not the "answer" portion, but something to do with the Local/ channel
21:55.01[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: Nothing else stands out from there.....
21:55.23jkroonwould it help at all to know what ${CHANNEL(nativeaudioformat)} is on the Local/ channel when performing the call routing?  ie, just before the Dial() onto the IAX/2 channel?
21:56.05jkroon[TK]D-Fender, ok, how do I confirm/go about testing your theory?
21:58.47TechSmurfjkroon: progressinband=yes/prematuremedia=no fixed it
21:59.17jkroonTechSmurf, interesting.
21:59.28jkroonwhat does the SIP signalling look like after setting that?
21:59.37jkroonstill sending 180s?  or 183s?
22:00.08jkroon[TK]D-Fender, just before Dial() I added a NoOP, with the following info: audioreadformat=slin,audiowriteformat=slin,audionativeformat=slin
22:00.40jkroonso IMHO that pretty much confirms it for me ... Local/ is forcing it via slin ... how to prevent that now becomes the appropriate question?
22:01.21TechSmurf100->180->183
22:02.15jkroonTechSmurf, Progress() probably would have achieved the same, basically as the call comes in you just call Progress() on that channel, which will immediately send a 183 to the calling channel, and from there asterisk will (if I understand it correctly) signal "inband"
22:02.52TechSmurfyes, but I have no idea wtf you mean, and that's as close as google got me ;)
22:03.24jkroonexten => ???,n,Progress() ... _somewhere_ in your dialplan that will get executed on the calls :)
22:04.26jkroon[TK]D-Fender, is there any way to inform to the Local channel what it's "native" format should be?
22:05.43jkroonfrom what I can tell, if I do a Dial(Local/foo) somewhere in my dialplan it inherits from the channel executing the Dial(), but obviously with originate there will be only the two Local/foo-1;2 channels and slin is the obvious choice there, but they don't switch to whatever other formats are on either end ... ?
22:06.21jkroonso in my originate case I'd expect the NoOP() above to report g729 since that call leg has already been bridged to a g729 channel ?
22:06.27jkroonor am I missing something?
22:11.56jkroon[TK]D-Fender, ok, local_new initializes those formats, and slin seems as sane a default as any from app_originate, from whence AST_FORMAT_SLINEAR is hard-coded.
22:12.10[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: Not that I can see..... This was just a suspect on my side now confirmed... but I dont know of a reason for it...
22:13.25jkroonok, let's assume i'd like to do something about it ... specifically, when ;1 gets bridged, I'd like to see if it's possible to switch from slin to whatever format ;1 is bridged to (which is obviously possible since ;2 isn't connected yet), how would I go about doing that?
22:14.06jkroonis there some hook in chan_local that I can react on?
22:14.50[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: this is a rather in-depth question you should really take to -dev.  It has definitely left the scope of what I can assist you with
22:15.23jkroon[TK]D-Fender, hehe, that answer most certainly surprises me.  it was just said a short whilst back that you are pretty knowledgeable.
22:15.30jkrooni thank you for sharing that knowledge.
22:17.14jkroonreally thanks!  you've been a great help.  much appreciated.
22:17.20[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: I am on the usage side, but you're right into the source at this point .... I've never coded for * directly
22:17.41jkroonyou do work for digium right?
22:17.56jkroonor am i off the mark?
22:18.26[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: At the very least I'm good for making sure we look at every layer that is presented to us... it higlighted the layer that is indeed responsible ... now how to change that to something usefull.... well thats for others to pick up for you
22:18.52[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: No affiliation with any telephony related company
22:19.00jkroonhehe, ok, let's see if I can phrase this nicely to -dev.
22:19.00[TK]D-Fenderjkroon: I'm just here"
22:19.17jkroon[TK]D-Fender, rofl, that's very kind of you.
22:20.55*** join/#asterisk wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com)
22:22.42*** join/#asterisk shido6 (~shido6@nat/yahoo/x-lgvqbqxbijmkmact)
22:30.33carrarpoints to the bed in the corner of the room with the guitar case on it
22:30.39carrarthats where TK sleeps
22:31.35carrarThats his katana next to it, advise you not to touch it
22:31.59carrarWhere there is one katana, there is always another!!
22:35.48[TK]D-Fendercarrar: I've got 3...
22:36.01zenmasterHi, I was intrested in setting up filters on call lists. Is there any good examples on this?
22:36.02carrarsee!
22:36.11carrarIPTABLES :)
22:36.24carrarblock all UDP
22:36.33zenmasterhaha.
22:37.18[TK]D-FenderBut only 1 filter.  If you put 2 the coffee can't pass through and you'll block up the whole system
22:37.43carrarespresso!
22:56.54*** join/#asterisk jrgill (~jrgill@unaffiliated/jrgill)
23:01.50*** join/#asterisk fskrotzki_ (~fskrotzki@cpe-67-253-245-174.rochester.res.rr.com)
23:11.12*** join/#asterisk wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com)
23:26.46*** join/#asterisk mchou (~quassel@unaffiliated/mchou)
23:35.02*** join/#asterisk aross42 (~aross@CPE485b390978ce-CM00222ddf42dd.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
23:48.38*** join/#asterisk ledoktre (~chatzilla@omni-01-161.cable.netins.net)
23:57.34*** join/#asterisk wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.