IRC log for #asterisk on 20120131

00:00.04*** join/#asterisk Phil (~phil@2001:0:5ef5:79fd:2835:f17f:26f2:749b)
00:01.39PhilI have an Asterisk server mostly configured with two analogue phones and a SIP phone
00:02.09PhilI'm in the UK so I changed Caller ID Start to polarity on the trunk which allowed the SIP phone to see the CID
00:02.23Philhowever the analogue phones do not get it still
00:02.40PhilI'm thinking this is because it's sending the CID incorrectly for UK phones
00:02.44Philhow can I configure this?
00:03.29navaismohttp://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+and+UK+Caller+ID
00:04.08*** join/#asterisk lanning (~lanning@173-8-187-197-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
00:04.59Philthanks, I'll try that
00:05.15*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@70.36.76.167)
00:05.44*** join/#asterisk SeRi (~wtf@c-76-31-169-54.hsd1.tx.comcast.net)
00:11.44*** join/#asterisk k-man (~k-man@unaffiliated/k-man)
00:16.34Philawesome, navaismo :)
00:16.35Philthanks
00:17.43navaismonp
00:21.09*** join/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@user-69-1-6-49.knology.net)
00:21.09*** mode/#asterisk [+o mjordan] by ChanServ
00:50.49*** join/#asterisk serafie (~erin@75.76.38.159)
00:51.52*** join/#asterisk shido6 (~shido6@nat/yahoo/x-ztbgkryagrlkzptw)
01:00.32*** join/#asterisk shido6 (~shido6@nat/yahoo/x-cssoqtqtgmzqhqrf)
01:03.26FiReSTaRTanybody with a bit of shorewall knowledge? if i wanna allow all established connections from net to $fw on 5060, i would just put 'ACCEPT net $FW udp 5060' in the ESTABLISHED section?
01:11.20*** join/#asterisk KavanS (~KavanS@LINBIT/KavanS)
01:13.23jpsharpThere's really no concept of "established" connections with UDP, though.
01:13.40jpsharpdunno anything about shorewall, though.
01:16.47*** join/#asterisk arii (ari@lol.ebnj.net)
01:18.10*** join/#asterisk jsjc (~Adium@77.209.224.3)
01:18.56ariihey.. so i have a digium card with some FXO ports connected to some phones, and everything about asterisk is working fine, but when making a call to/from an FXO phone, after the other side hangs up, i just get a busy signal on the FXO phone instead of a hangup
01:19.08ariithe asterisk  console seems to think it's hung up the FXO side
01:22.36ariianything i should try?
01:24.59*** join/#asterisk volga629 (~slava@76-10-130-18.dsl.teksavvy.com)
01:25.03volga629ERROR[11559] chan_sip.c: No SRTP module loaded, can't setup SRTP session.
01:25.25volga629asterisk 1.8.7.1
01:26.10p3nguinarii: Phones don't connect to FXO ports on the card.  Perhaps that's part of the problem.
01:26.28volga629Asterisk 1.8.7.1
01:26.31ariithen i reversed the description and they're connected to FXS
01:26.40ariibut everything about them works fine - they can get a dial tone, make calls, etc.
01:26.43p3nguinBe sure.
01:26.55ariii'm sure
01:39.21p3nguinseri: Are you around?
01:46.10*** join/#asterisk GGD (~deberle@pool-173-72-204-39.clppva.fios.verizon.net)
01:50.53*** join/#asterisk ruben23 (~RLACUMBA@121.97.111.142)
02:11.05ruben23hi guys
02:12.11*** part/#asterisk arii (ari@lol.ebnj.net)
02:12.17SeRip3nguin: waz up
02:12.30ruben23hi guys can anyone help me how to remove this warning error on my asterisk its populating the whole CLI screen ----> http://pastebin.com/pLCbfMpq
02:13.28SeRip3nguin: I just got in. Today was my first day at the new job.
02:14.28g_r_eekhello channel, i have an asterisk connnectic behind a att gsm modem and it seems that att using a proxy the registration port changing constantly so the registar server does not find the peer in between this registrations is a short re expire time on the peer a solution to that problem?
02:14.50g_r_eek*reg expire
02:16.00sysdefi have capi running (by Fritz!Box Remote CAPI over TCP) and "capi info" is listing the devices. i expect i will see any reaction (logs) when i call the number but nothing happens
02:18.03*** join/#asterisk serafie (~erin@75.76.38.159)
02:18.19ruben23any one have idea guys..?
02:19.50*** join/#asterisk alexoc (~alexoc@187.64.254.47)
02:20.22*** join/#asterisk FainaUkraina (~Gene@059148208218.ctinets.com)
02:22.12*** part/#asterisk k-man (~k-man@unaffiliated/k-man)
02:24.31p3nguinseri: I wanted to go over something with you...
02:24.40SeRimsg me
02:24.46p3nguinOkay.
02:25.44*** join/#asterisk carrar (tim@osburn.com)
02:25.51*** join/#asterisk JamesJRH (~james@vennington.plus.com)
02:25.54*** join/#asterisk radic (~radic@dslb-178-002-223-048.pools.arcor-ip.net)
02:26.04*** join/#asterisk jaytee (~jforde051@unaffiliated/jaytee)
02:26.16*** join/#asterisk tzanger (tzanger@wallace.mixdown.ca)
02:26.28*** join/#asterisk GameGamer43 (~GameGamer@li119-60.members.linode.com)
02:26.37*** join/#asterisk scubes13 (~scubes13@cpe-024-168-196-000.sc.res.rr.com)
02:29.08*** join/#asterisk liban (~liban@CPE00222d90c50a-CM00222d90c506.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
02:29.20libanhello everyone,
02:29.49libani am at the end of the road with a problem i have can someone give me a direction??
02:30.09libanother than jump off a cliff which i am about to do
02:30.28p3nguin~ask
02:30.29infobotQuestions in the channel should be specific, informative, complete, concise, and on-topic.  Don't ask if you can ask a question first.  Don't ask if a person is there; just ask what you intended to ask them.  Better questions more frequently yield better answers.  We are all here voluntarily or against our will.
02:30.54*** join/#asterisk magicrhesus (~magicrhes@aether.hipocoon.be)
02:31.00libani have timing slips crc4 erros and e-bit erros
02:31.24libanno irq misses
02:31.57libaneverything is configured correctly on the span
02:32.07libandouble and triple checked by digium techs
02:32.36libanpap loop test didnt pass
02:32.49libancyclic test was good
02:33.07libanany ideas what to do
02:33.40*** join/#asterisk hackeron (~hackeron@gentoo/user/hackeron)
02:36.40libananyone?
02:40.30*** join/#asterisk Gugge (gugge@kriminel.dk)
02:49.31libanif anyone can help that'd be great
02:51.56WIMPysysdef: I've done it once, just to see if it's possible. have you tried all interfaces?
02:59.30*** join/#asterisk tomaw (tom@freenode/staff/tomaw)
03:03.59libanCRC4 error count: 178002 E-bit error count: 188676 Timing slips: 20
03:04.02libanthats what i get
03:05.20WIMPyThat looks really bad. Is the timing source configured correctly?
03:05.44WIMPyIs it only one port or multiple?
03:05.53libanyes and its multiple ports
03:05.55libandual span
03:06.39WIMPyBoth with errors?
03:06.47libanjst one is enable rright now
03:06.54libanspan 1 to be more specific
03:07.32WIMPyIs the cabling correctly terminated?
03:08.02libanhmm i would imagine so
03:08.30libanare u referring to the T1 circuit
03:09.02WIMPyIt's a T1?
03:09.18libanPRI ... T1 yes
03:09.42WIMPyIn that case I wonder what E bits are meant by that message.
03:10.35WIMPywas thinking of bits in the E-channel.
03:10.50libanSpan 1: TE2/0/1 "T2XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 1" (MASTER) B8ZS/ESF ClockSource CRC4 error count: 193423E-bit error count: 205013Timing slips: 21
03:11.00libanthats what i get now
03:11.03libanits going crazy
03:11.32WIMPyyes
03:12.33libanany ideas?
03:12.42libanor relse ima get my dick chopped off tomorrow
03:12.51libanima constantly have to restart this box a million times tomorrow
03:13.06libanduring business hours :(
03:13.18WIMPyYou are able to make calls?
03:13.33libanyes but static and clicks
03:13.48libanand its cut off after sometime
03:14.35WIMPyNot too bad.
03:14.42libanive done everything with the digium tech support, i thoght id get a second opinion
03:15.05libantiming slips will go to over 200
03:15.20WIMPyDo you have any other equipment to check if the line is actually in a usable state?
03:15.42libanu know
03:15.50libanthats a good idea
03:15.51libanlol
03:15.54libani do but
03:16.28libani doubt id be able to make calls out, i havent configured the system i dont have access to it
03:16.37libani'll try that thought
03:16.40libananything else?
03:17.56WIMPyIf the timing is correct, I'd expect it to be somethign on the T1 side of the card.
03:18.23libanhave u heard of digium cards going bad cant keep timing?
03:18.30*** join/#asterisk [ALT][F4] (~altf4@183.89.92.232)
03:18.31libancause i doubt its the telecom side
03:18.44WIMPyNo
03:18.46libanif their timing is off then a million other customers be complaining
03:19.23WIMPyTiming is just one possible cause of the problem.
03:19.27libanwell is the timing the root cause?
03:19.49libanand the crc4 e-bit erros are a result i assume right?
03:20.01WIMPyIt can be any kind of transmission error.
03:20.45libani see
03:21.36*** part/#asterisk ruben23 (~RLACUMBA@121.97.111.142)
03:22.15libanill try to change
03:22.20libanthe phone system to check
03:22.28libanany other ideas?
03:22.47WIMPynope
03:23.25libanVGA and Digium card on same IRQ .... no irq misses, u think it can still be a problem?
03:24.23WIMPyIf it is, it should tell you.
03:24.32WIMPyDid you try dahdi_test?
03:26.06libanyea looks good
03:27.20[ALT][F4]does anyone have a clue how to "apend" numbers to CID on incomming SIP Trunks ?
03:27.58libanare u using this for incoming fax?
03:28.18WIMPySet(CALLERID(num)...
03:28.57[ALT][F4]WIMPy: i try that already .. but somehow it shows either nothing or only the number  (probably caused by my stupidity in setting it up) :P
03:29.23[ALT][F4]i sinply want to hardcode the country code on incomming calls and strip the leading 0
03:30.23WIMPy${cc}${CALLERID(num):1}
03:32.02libanthank you
03:32.21libanwimpy for ur help
03:33.18WIMPyThat e bit still puzzels me
03:33.33libanwhat is e-bit?
03:33.39libanim so clueless with this stuff
03:34.20WIMPyNFI. I thought of bits from the E-channel. But I don't think a PRI has one.
03:34.30WIMPyStill trying to find out.
03:38.28[ALT][F4]thanks . that looks very simple ;)
03:38.54[ALT][F4]now just have to get rid of the timeout issues ..
03:38.57[ALT][F4]to test it
03:39.48[ALT][F4]does anyone know a good advice on how to set router (prefered routeros) to have asterisk connect nicely to remote SIP Trunks ?
03:41.53*** join/#asterisk dimbulb (~totallyre@tacomatelematics.com)
03:43.05[ALT][F4]since few days having "NOTICE[204]: chan_sip.c:7810 in sip_reg_timeout:    -- Registration for '9413091@sipgate.de' timed out, trying again (Attempt #3553)" in the logs … sure something about the NAT and routes
03:43.30[TK]D-Fender~sipnat
03:43.30infobot[~sipnat] Quick guide on configuring Asterisk + SIP behind NAT: http://www.aocomputing.net/?p=3 otherwise check the WIKI at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SIP+NAT+solutions .  Typically, you MUST configure these settings with appropriate values in the [general] section of sip.conf: nat, canreinvite, externhost or externip, and localnet.
03:43.32[TK]D-Fender^^
03:43.57[ALT][F4]routeros have some helper system for SIP behind nat… but i think it screws things up instead of make it smooth
03:44.15WIMPyThey all do
03:45.53[ALT][F4]it worked perfectly with my SIP Phone for years … but asterisk seems to have some trouble
03:45.56dimbulbThis may seem like a dumb question, but my google is weak.   How do I direct calls to chan_alsa in a dialplan?
03:46.32WIMPyconsole/alsa
03:47.34dimbulbthanks!
03:48.53*** join/#asterisk Guest8383 (~Geek@unaffiliated/cain)
03:56.20*** part/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@user-69-1-6-49.knology.net)
03:58.33*** join/#asterisk ajkaanbal (~ajkaanbal@189.143.60.109)
03:59.33*** join/#asterisk Synoptic (~synoptic@modemcable171.137-83-70.mc.videotron.ca)
03:59.38SynopticHi there
04:00.04SynopticHi there, i'm trying to display the value of ${CALLERID(name)} in the log
04:00.25Synopticwhat is the fucntion to do that ? I'm in from-pstn-custom context for that
04:00.39Synopticwhich loads first (almost) when a call comes in.
04:01.07SynopticI'd like to know what is that value when someone is blocking it's CID name, because I need to do something with that variable after
04:02.46SynopticNoOP
04:02.59*** join/#asterisk liban (~liban@CPE00222d90c50a-CM00222d90c506.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
04:04.27libanCRC4 error count: 277782 E-bit error count: 299398 1TE2/0/1/1 Clear (In use) YELLOW (EC: VPMOCT064 - INACTIVE)
04:04.45libanthis is what i get now... crazyyy
04:04.52libanno one using the system
04:05.27WIMPyIf the link is broken, it's broken. No matter what the users do.
04:06.39libancan i ask the telecom to do something from their end any test to suggest?
04:07.18WIMPySure, but only to the NT.
04:09.26libanNT?
04:09.50*** join/#asterisk NetNut404 (~Net@stephenson.cc)
04:11.30WIMPyThe network terminator.
04:13.28libanwell.. thanks wimpy i appriciate it
04:15.23NetNut404I need some info on troubleshooting the email notifications of asterisk .. logs say in debug the message was sent, but it never reaches the mail server logs.. but from from what I read in the source code file it says it would complain if it had trouble writing the file in /tmp that it mails correct ?
04:16.04NetNut404I guess might make a different on the version.. it's 1.8.7  (centos rpms)
04:25.19*** join/#asterisk meest (~alpaca@155-23-88-118.dcwest.net.au)
04:29.31*** join/#asterisk gajini (~root@61.12.17.170)
04:49.26NetNut404I am quite lost in telling where to look for why emails are not being sent   even though the logs claim they are
04:54.23ChannelZare you talking about voicemails?
04:57.03*** join/#asterisk fisted (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
04:58.34NetNut404yup
04:59.01NetNut404the emails for notifications of voicemails.. or the voicemails themselves
05:02.09ChannelZasterisk doesn't contain a mailer, it just calls some other commandline mta - default sendmail.  See voicemail.conf mailcmd I think
05:04.23ChannelZif your server isn't setup to do mail, you can get something like msmtp and have it send to some other SMTPD that can deliver it from there.  That's what I do as my Asterisk box does not have a mail server running on it
05:04.35ChannelZ(nor do I want one on it)
05:08.25meestDoes dahdi allocate memory for the dahdi_chan.writechunk?
05:12.38NetNut404right it says it send with sendmail -t
05:13.41NetNut404s/send/sent
05:16.39*** join/#asterisk dospod (~dospod@cpe-24-175-162-210.stx.res.rr.com)
05:31.59*** part/#asterisk dospod (~dospod@cpe-24-175-162-210.stx.res.rr.com)
05:46.00meestWhere can I found dahdi documentation?
05:49.56*** join/#asterisk Lipsum (~lipsum@77.40.154.242)
05:58.06*** join/#asterisk coppice (~coppice@m121-202-15-202.smartone.com)
05:58.38kaldemarmeest: http://docs.tzafrir.org.il/
05:59.05kaldemarmeest: other than that, DAHDI is kind of poorly documented.
05:59.41meestyeah, I have noticed that. I have read that document many times lol
06:00.06meestI have pretty much everything set up, got the channels registered and all that
06:00.31meestbut i cant seem to access the write and readchunk stuff in the channels
06:07.23*** join/#asterisk pnunn (~pnunn@58.108.220.221)
06:19.15*** join/#asterisk mintos (mvaliyav@nat/redhat/x-sqdawajiqwxgmhzu)
06:23.02*** join/#asterisk Netgeeks (~chris@173.11.68.156)
06:30.56*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@82-168-115-40.ip.telfort.nl)
06:46.31*** join/#asterisk prasanthprabalan (~root@218.248.24.19)
06:47.44*** join/#asterisk singler (~singler@81-7-123-162.static.zebra.lt)
06:50.51*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
06:51.10*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
06:58.48PrabalanHi all
06:59.02PrabalanI am getting an error in Asterisk
06:59.06PrabalanERROR[3806]: chan_sip.c:13072 register_verify: Peer 'prasanth' is trying to register, but not configured as host=dynamic
06:59.39PrabalanIn sip i have configured 'prasanth' as its IP address
07:00.21kaldemarwhy?
07:02.14Prabalanhttp://pastebin.com/913qpME9
07:02.25PrabalanThis is my sip conf.
07:03.14PrabalanI order for the asterisk to know the peer, i have done like that
07:03.24PrabalanAny problem there
07:05.41kaldemarPrabalan: ip addres is just one way to know a peer.
07:06.14PrabalanOk.
07:06.30kaldemarPrabalan: you should either define it as dynamic or configure the peer to not register to you.
07:06.31PrabalanBut why am getting the error i mentioned above
07:06.40PrabalanERROR[3806]: chan_sip.c:13072 register_verify: Peer 'prasanth' is trying to register, but not configured as host=dynamic
07:07.08Prabalanso do i have to change the host to dynamic
07:07.09kaldemarregistrations are only allowed for devices that are defined as dynamic.
07:08.28PrabalanMy device 'prasanth' is an IP phone. I have set it not as dynamic.
07:08.43PrabalanSo my question is still why it is trying to register
07:09.10*** join/#asterisk s[X] (~s_x_@eth589.qld.adsl.internode.on.net)
07:09.28*** join/#asterisk felipe_ (~felipe@unaffiliated/felipe)
07:09.50kaldemarPrabalan: i don't even know what your phone is.
07:14.57PrabalanMy phone is an IP Polycom Phone. Do i have to set in the phone setting that it is not dynamic
07:16.23Prabalankaldemar: Am not able to find any settings in the IP phone related to registration
07:18.24kaldemarPrabalan: the option is called "register" in the GUI and reg.X.server.Y.register in the XML configs.
07:18.37kaldemarPrabalan: however, there's no reason to disable registration for a phone.
07:19.04kaldemarjust configure the peer as dynamic.
07:19.35Prabalanok i will configure the peer as dynamic
07:23.49*** join/#asterisk bn-7bc (bjarne@pdpc/supporter/active/bn-7bc)
07:26.19NetNut404I dont get the voicemail here..  the mailcmd does nothing for notification  I even put a small script there instead of mail to see if it ran.. and it didnt..  but logs on debug say they do
07:33.17*** join/#asterisk s[X] (~s_x_@eth589.qld.adsl.internode.on.net)
07:40.25ChannelZYour script might have failed for any number of reasons (like permissions, or environment)
07:40.38ChannelZDo your mail logs show the mail or an error?
07:42.37*** join/#asterisk roham (~ali@31.184.187.2)
07:42.39*** join/#asterisk bjornts (~BTS@it010226.klientdrift.uib.no)
07:50.51*** join/#asterisk jzaw (~jzaw@2001:8b0:7:0:216:cbff:febe:f5dd)
07:52.46NetNut404no
07:52.52NetNut404the mail logs show nothing
07:52.59NetNut404no connection at all
07:53.19NetNut404and a echo to a file in /tmp should never fail
07:53.25NetNut404it would not even do that
07:54.27NetNut404but the debug asterik log claims it runs.. there is never any evidence of it running
07:57.07*** join/#asterisk ferdna (~yup@cpe-67-10-220-35.elp.res.rr.com)
08:10.25*** join/#asterisk ollii (~risker@port-87-193-161-154.static.qsc.de)
08:13.04ChannelZnot sure what to say
08:13.09ChannelZmailcmd=/bin/echo farting >/tmp/farting
08:13.14ChannelZworks here
08:14.06*** join/#asterisk Jimmy890 (~chatzilla@92.60.238.0)
08:16.20*** join/#asterisk elliot98 (~elliot@unaffiliated/elliot98)
08:16.27elliot98politely enteres
08:17.22elliot98ok, so the Asterisk server needs to authenticate with every call it sends to a certain provider, so using the register directive in sip.conf is not good enough...where do username/password authentication go?
08:18.29elliot98would be adding username/password in the peer details enough?
08:22.18kaldemarelliot98: registration has little to do with call authentication. put credentials in the peer definition.
08:23.20*** join/#asterisk stix (~stix@193.89.191.209)
08:24.11*** join/#asterisk Nasga (~Nasga@199.79.125.78.rev.sfr.net)
08:30.20*** join/#asterisk krotos (~d3v1l@host140-63-dynamic.21-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it)
08:30.21krotoshi al :
08:30.25krotoshi all :
08:32.20elliot98kaldemar: ok, good, thanks...just to understand authentication a bit better, the username/password inside either a peer, user, or friend, works in either direction for call authentication?
08:33.02elliot98if the asterisk server places a call and needs to be authenticated, it will use those credentials, and if an incoming call needs credentials (ie. without insecure=invite set), it will use the same credentials
08:33.18elliot98greetings krotos
08:37.53*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:5410:d962:eef8:90a3)
08:39.08*** join/#asterisk freeman_u (~freeman@gw.quart-soft.net)
08:41.18*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
08:41.25kaldemarelliot98: simplified. depending what you dial, fromuser may also be needed.
08:44.38elliot98kaldemar: ok, so if the remote server and local Asterisk server needs different credentials for authenticating a call, one should create a separate peer and user account?
08:44.52krotosi'm upgrading a old server that use a openvox B400P/B200P (with 2 bri port). Is correct if i load the wcb4xxp for this card and blaclist hfcmulti and msISDN?
08:48.48kaldemarelliot98: or define remotesecret for the peer.
08:53.54*** join/#asterisk goddva (~glarsen@77.40.154.242)
09:02.06*** join/#asterisk Da-Geek (~Da-Geek@82.111.116.66)
09:04.18*** join/#asterisk binbash_ (~peter@server.digitog.nl)
09:11.24elliot98kaldemar: aha..ok, making sense now, basically, the remote will be associated with the particular peer according to IP address, but if authetication is needed, it will look the remotesecret.
09:19.09kaldemarelliot98: see "Naming devices" here: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/tags/10.0.1/configs/sip.conf.sample
09:26.58*** join/#asterisk goddva (~glarsen@77.40.154.242)
09:27.10*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
09:32.04*** join/#asterisk bulkorok (~bulkorok@85.183.36.36)
09:49.18*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@78.24.104.73)
09:54.30*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@78.24.104.73)
09:55.50*** join/#asterisk ollii (~risker@vpn.nbank.de)
10:03.04*** join/#asterisk r33dtard (~r33dtard@gateway/tor-sasl/r33dtard)
10:07.47*** join/#asterisk stix_ (~stix@94.191.185.162.mobile.3.dk)
10:08.35jacc0it's a sad day for the internet in the netherlands
10:08.43jacc0the strated blocking websites
10:08.46jacc0*they
10:08.54jacc0:S
10:09.17jacc0so much for my free country
10:10.34cuscojacc0: :(
10:10.53cuscoproduce a public letter
10:11.06cuscoand make people send a copy of it to their local MP's
10:11.34jacc0there is a lot of ongoing action
10:11.57jacc0mirrors of blocked websites keep poping up @ a raid of about 40 an hour
10:13.03*** join/#asterisk dtcrshr (~datacrush@unaffiliated/datacrusher)
10:17.45*** join/#asterisk stix_ (~stix@193.89.191.209)
10:20.20krotoshi, someone have used a openvox b400p/b200p?
10:20.47krotoswhat module should i use? if i load the wcb4xxp and blacklist hfcmulti and msISDN is correct?
10:22.35*** join/#asterisk [ALT][F4] (~altf4@ppp-58-11-96-124.revip2.asianet.co.th)
10:23.11[ALT][F4]anyone an idea how to obtain the user-status with asterisk-gui ? (what ajax call is doing that)
10:24.30*** join/#asterisk felimwhiteley (~quassel@089-101-203026.ntlworld.ie)
10:24.31*** join/#asterisk nova911 (~Adium@59.162.86.164)
10:26.03*** join/#asterisk master_of_master (~master_of@p57B53038.dip.t-dialin.net)
10:27.32[ALT][F4]ah found it ..
10:34.28*** join/#asterisk krotos (~d3v1l@host140-63-dynamic.21-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it)
10:39.04*** join/#asterisk jsjc (~Adium@226.Red-80-33-236.staticIP.rima-tde.net)
10:56.53*** join/#asterisk dtcrshr (~datacrush@unaffiliated/datacrusher)
11:03.02*** join/#asterisk TimeRider (~steve@host81-136-216-215.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
11:14.09*** join/#asterisk s[X] (~s_x_@ppp59-167-157-96.static.internode.on.net)
11:16.07*** join/#asterisk vfabi (~fabi@host-static-93-116-255-140.moldtelecom.md)
11:19.54PrabalanHI ALL
11:20.28Prabalani am usinf an fxo/fxs card TDM410P
11:20.55PrabalanIt is having 2 ports active; port 1 and 4
11:22.15PrabalanPort one i have connected to an analog phone at my desk and to port 4 i have connected to the intercom line of my office
11:23.59PrabalanCall to my analog from intercom i have configured. But my analog phone is not giving a ring
11:26.48PrabalanThis is my chan_dahdi.conf:    http://pastebin.com/HWMQ8YZd
11:26.50*** join/#asterisk yacine64 (~yacine64@196.20.107.193)
11:27.09PrabalanPlz have a look and give suggestion
11:30.32Prabalan...
11:30.35PrabalanHi
11:31.30PrabalanHow to configure my analog phone connected to FXO/FXS card for getting calls from intercom line..????
11:31.34PrabalanPlz help
11:38.27PrabalanAny more details needed??
11:42.27kaldemardo you get a call when DAHDI/1 is dialed and you pick up the handset?
11:42.49kaldemarcan you dial from the phone? do you get dialtone when you pick up the handset?
11:44.21PrabalanWhen DAHDI/1 is been called am getting ring in asterisk but not from by analog phone which is connected to port 1
11:45.09PrabalanNo my actuall problem is that am not getting the dial tone in my analog phone connected to PORT 1 of FXO/FXS card
11:51.16PrabalanThis is my extension
11:51.18Prabalanhttp://pastebin.com/eWQ1qBfK
12:01.58kaldemarPrabalan: is the port really an FXS?
12:02.39kaldemardo you see the channels in asterisk with "dahdi show channels"?
12:08.24*** join/#asterisk singler (~singler@84.15.129.49)
12:13.26Prabalandahdi show channel o/p:     http://pastebin.com/ff3suKk0
12:15.02PrabalanThe port is FXS itself
12:15.51PrabalanThis is the auto generated system.conf file: http://pastebin.com/UpqiUAAr
12:16.25PrabalanAuto generated by the command dahdi_genconf -v
12:16.44kaldemarand channel 4 works?
12:16.57PrabalanYa channel 4 is working fine
12:17.07kaldemarmaybe the phone is not properly connected, the cable is bad, the module is broken or something else.
12:17.12Prabalanam able to call out to my intercome using a soft phone
12:17.30PrabalanNo that all part i have properly checked
12:17.38Prabalanthat is not the reason
12:17.41kaldemarwith other equipment?
12:18.21Prabalanya i have cross checked
12:18.42*** join/#asterisk anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@187-28-37-118.poolip.RJO.embratel.net.br)
12:18.44Prabalando we get the ring tone normally once phone is connected to the port??
12:20.37*** join/#asterisk ollii (~risker@2001:470:1f15:1384:62eb:69ff:fe31:b4)
12:23.29*** join/#asterisk caveat- (hoax@gateway/shell/bshellz.net/x-ljgexiwolzedrcmp)
12:26.07*** join/#asterisk aberrios (~aberrios@195.171.4.82)
12:27.09aberriosHey folks. Is there a way of going to the previous step in the dial-plan? I have an i extension that will catch invalid input from a number of steps, and I want it to go back to the step that was last...if that makes sense
12:29.30jacc0use labels ?
12:29.46jacc0goto(label) ?
12:30.11aberriosbut i wont know which label to go to necessarily.....
12:30.13aberriosunless
12:30.17aberriosI set a variable
12:30.22aberriosthat could work
12:30.34aberriosgoto(${labelvar})
12:31.30*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
12:32.09kaldemaraberrios: how would you not know?
12:34.09aberrioskaldemar, I would if I set a variable. But for example I have 0,1,SayText("Press 0 for a taxi from XYZ") and s,n,SayText(If you would like to speak to an operator, press 1) any invalid input from these would to to i,1, but extension i would know which step the invalid input came from.
12:34.34aberrioswouldnt know*
12:35.43*** join/#asterisk lost_architect (~james@02786d1e.bb.sky.com)
12:35.49kaldemarmaybe you should handle the input validation in the extension itself, and not let it jump to i.
12:36.35aberrioskaldemar, i did start off that way, but its easier and less messy using the interrupt provided by SayText("Text",i)
12:36.56aberriosi just needed to get around the i extension knowing where to send the caller back to
12:38.04*** join/#asterisk Linuturk_ (~linuturk@unaffiliated/linuturk)
12:40.07*** join/#asterisk leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
12:40.07*** mode/#asterisk [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ
12:42.31*** join/#asterisk r33dtard (~r33dtard@gateway/tor-sasl/r33dtard)
12:55.10aberrioshm this could be useful ${INVALID_EXTEN}
12:56.11aberriosor maybe not
13:00.56leifmadsenaberrios: what are you trying to do?
13:01.57aberriosleifmadsen, its okay i've got it. I've set a variable in each extension, like exten => 0,1,Set(position=${EXTEN},${PRIORITY}) and then i looks like
13:02.04aberriosexten => i,1,SayText("Sorry that is an invalid option, please try again")
13:02.04aberriosexten => i,n,GoTo(${position})
13:02.34leifmadsenaberrios: that's a GoSub()
13:02.40leifmadsenpretty much anyways
13:02.50aberriosGoSub eh,,, I'll look it up
13:03.10leifmadsenI'm not sure I like the idea of placing a comma in the channel variable name.
13:03.15leifmadsens/name/value/
13:04.31*** join/#asterisk wesphillips (~wphill04@137-237-233-124.harris.com)
13:06.00aberriosleifmadsen, hmm I'm not sure how i'd use GoSub in my IVR.. I know I'd need i to look like exten => i,1,Return but I'm not sure where the GoSub would be in each of my extensions... maybe 0,1,GoSub()??
13:06.36leifmadsenThere are other tools you should probably be using, like GoSub(), GoSubIf(), DIALPLAN_EXISTS(), etc.
13:06.53leifmadsenI think you're relying on the 'i' too much
13:06.53aberriosleifmadsen, I'm using SayText("Wibble",i) and they give an invalid extension here,,where does the GoSub come into it?
13:07.17leifmadsenFor 'i' in an auto-attendant, I usually just return to the top, or near the top and give them the menu again
13:07.30leifmadsenexten => aa,n(start),NoOp()
13:07.31leifmadsen<PROTECTED>
13:07.39leifmadsenexten => i,n,Goto(aa,start)
13:07.56aberriosleifmadsen, It did cross my mind that'd be easy. But I'd rather not people go straight to the top of it and have to listen to a load of stuff again just for accidently pressing the wrong button
13:08.02leifmadsenaberrios: I came in well after when you described your problem
13:08.13aberriosleifmadsen, :)
13:08.38leifmadsenya, I don't like you using the comma though. I'd prefer to see it changed to a hyphen or something, then use CUT() to return
13:09.10leifmadsenexten => i,n,GotoIf($[${EXISTS(${position})}]?${CUT(position,-,1),${CUT(position,-,2)})
13:09.16leifmadsengiven that is significantly crazier
13:09.47leifmadsenjust that the method you're using is an old parlance for multi-set
13:10.02leifmadsen(which is now MSet()
13:12.36*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~aoulton@216.191.106.162)
13:17.10*** join/#asterisk rgsteele (~rgsteele@apo.aweber.com)
13:20.07*** join/#asterisk rossand (~aross@CPE485b390978ce-CM00222ddf42dd.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
13:28.53*** join/#asterisk FiReSTaRT (~dlyh@unaffiliated/firestart)
13:29.38*** join/#asterisk s[X] (~s_x_@ppp59-167-157-96.static.internode.on.net)
13:31.58*** join/#asterisk generalhan (~generalha@about/windows/staff/generalhan)
13:33.08*** join/#asterisk Kalidarn (~unknown@unaffiliated/kalidarn)
13:40.58*** join/#asterisk Gaiax (be19ebae@gateway/web/freenode/ip.190.25.235.174)
13:49.01sekilhi
13:49.17sekilI'm still on * 1.2...have to move for one installationt to 1.6+ version
13:49.28sekilso the answer is ...do I use 1.6 or 1.8 version?
13:49.43sekilI need to configure digium b410p with dahdi/libpri
13:49.53sekilerr answer=question
13:50.55leifmadsensekil: 1.6.0 and 1.6.1 are end-of-life, and 1.6.2 is security fixes only (about another 5-6 months). 1.8 is LTS and currently supported.
13:50.58leifmadsen~asterisk-versioning
13:50.58infobotit has been said that asterisk-versioning is http://blogs.asterisk.org/2009/06/24/about-the-new-asterisk-versioning-method/
13:51.06leifmadsen~asteriskversions
13:51.30leifmadsen~asterisk-versions
13:51.30infobotInformation about Asterisk maintenance support and when branches will move into security fix only mode, and eventually end-of-life is available at https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions
13:51.44leifmadsensekil: ^^^ you can make a decision based on that
13:52.04sekilhm..I guess 1.8.x is the answer
13:52.39sekilany known issues with digium b410p bri isdn libpri/dahdi?
13:52.48sekilcurrently there is 1.2 with misdn
13:52.52sekilon the site
13:53.05leifmadsencan't answer as he doesn't use that hardware
13:53.45leifmadsensekil: either way, you're going to build on a separate devleopment box first and test, because upgrading a 1.2 production box to 1.8, without prior testing, isn't something you would ever consider thinking
13:54.05sekilthat's going to be done
13:54.13sekilI'm just asking what would new customers do
13:54.26sekilgo with 1.8 or 1.6
13:54.41sekilbut you answered that indirectly
13:54.58leifmadsenright, it would be silly to deploy a non-supported version of software
13:55.07sekilright
13:55.27sekilthanks
13:58.21*** join/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-benawpehpbbajqnr)
13:58.21*** mode/#asterisk [+o mjordan] by ChanServ
13:58.23*** part/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@70.36.76.167)
13:59.12leifmadsensekil: also fyi, there is no 1.6; it's 1.6.0, 1.6.1, and 1.6.2 (all major versions)
13:59.53sekilI see...I haven't been following the development recently
14:00.25sekilanyhow..I downloaded the newest 1.8.X and will start from there
14:00.40leifmadsenthat's why you'll see them outlined on the asterisk versions table separately
14:01.06sekiloh yes
14:01.28*** join/#asterisk ph8 (~ph8@unaffiliated/ph8)
14:02.00leifmadsenit was an experiment which didn't work as planned (there was supposed to be more frequent major releases, but that didn't appear to be possible
14:02.09leifmadsenso 1.8 was born, much like 1.2, 14, etc.
14:02.15leifmadsens/14/1.4/
14:09.11sekilso 1.6.x should not be used
14:09.29leifmadsenunless you already have it deployed, it doesn't make sense, so no.
14:09.38sekilyes
14:09.43*** join/#asterisk Chinorro (~chino@62.82.228.34.static.user.ono.com)
14:09.53leifmadsenI like 1.8 a lot, and it has some nice features
14:10.09leifmadsenand the latest O'Reilly book is written against 1.8 (there is no 1.6.x based book)
14:10.16sekilI have couple of 1.2 boxes with pris where ISDN aoc is used...there are some patches involved to make AoC work
14:10.32sekilbut I see that ISDN AoC support in libpri is more or less complete now..
14:10.35leifmadsengotcha, hopefully using DAHDI and 1.8 makes it so you don't need to
14:10.43sekilcorrect
14:10.51leifmadsenya, I think it is, but I'm uncertain as I haven't deployed AoC stuff
14:10.56leifmadsenit sounds familiar though
14:18.03*** join/#asterisk devmikey (~irc@unaffiliated/devmikey)
14:29.30*** join/#asterisk coppice (~coppice@m121-202-54-247.smartone.com)
14:34.57*** join/#asterisk pabelanger (~pabelange@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/pabelanger)
14:34.57*** mode/#asterisk [+o pabelanger] by ChanServ
14:36.08*** join/#asterisk serafie1 (~erin@nat/digium/x-yvcloqxbmfurgbfy)
14:36.20*** join/#asterisk _Corey_ (~chatzilla@64.121.4.75)
14:42.12*** join/#asterisk Dovid (~Dovid@office.mypbxmanager.net)
14:45.44*** join/#asterisk bn-7bc (bjarne@pdpc/supporter/active/bn-7bc)
14:48.31*** join/#asterisk ruben23 (~RLACUMBA@121.97.111.142)
14:51.18*** join/#asterisk rv (~rv@unaffiliated/rv)
14:51.21rvhi
14:51.43*** join/#asterisk fskrotzki_ (~fskrotzki@cpe-67-253-245-174.rochester.res.rr.com)
14:53.25*** join/#asterisk putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson)
14:53.25*** mode/#asterisk [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ
14:53.51rvanyone know how to do remote restart polycom 321?
14:54.35rvvia web conf page... when i change something and then submit.. phone save configuration but without restart
14:55.45WIMPysekil: It took me some time to find the parameter AOCenable, but after I found that, it actually worked.
14:56.07kaldemarrv: *CLI> sip notify polycom-check-cfg
14:56.47ruben23hi guys how do i disable warning on asterisk CLI..?
14:57.03[TK]D-Fenderruben23, "exit"
14:57.06kaldemarruben23: all warnings?
14:57.37*** join/#asterisk imox (~imox@91-64-181-64-dynip.superkabel.de)
14:58.10rvkaldemar: ? from rasterisk?
14:58.32rvbut this phone is not yet registered
14:58.49rvi have access via polycom web page
15:01.16kaldemarrv: yes, from asterisk. assign an ip for it and it doesn't matter if it's registered or not.
15:01.41kaldemarrv: or just send it a SIP notify with "Event: check-sync" as you wish.
15:01.46ruben23kaldemar:yes, is it possible to limit to a particular warning only..?
15:02.13sekilWIMPy: the one in zapata.conf...or whatever is the name now?
15:02.20kaldemarruben23: short answer, no.
15:02.35kaldemarruben23: what exactly do you mean by "warning"?
15:02.40rvkaldemar: ill try. thanks.
15:02.48*** join/#asterisk drknus (~user@blk-222-141-162.eastlink.ca)
15:03.14WIMPysekil: chan_dahdi.conf, yes
15:03.39sekilWIMPy: does it work when sip side hangs up first?
15:04.59ruben23kaldemar: this one ---->http://pastebin.com/pLCbfMpq
15:05.31WIMPysekil: There is an option to delay hangup, but I haven't tried it. I only checked AOC-D.
15:05.54sekilWIMPy: that's to wait E
15:06.04*** join/#asterisk fisted (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
15:06.04WIMPyyes
15:06.46sekilthere was an issue before when SIP side hangs up ...there was no aoc in dp/cdr....because it wouldn't wait for RELEASE COMPLETE on the isdn side...but killed the call
15:07.13sekilstructure needed to be expanded
15:08.00WIMPyYes, well Asterisks architecture doesn't really allow for anything to happen after a hangup.
15:08.32sekilthere's no reporting state or something similar
15:08.43WIMPyNope
15:08.52WIMPyAnd as I said, I haven't tried that delay thing.
15:09.02sekilI don't think delay thing is the issue...
15:09.17sekilthat's just to pickup E data
15:09.40sekiltest would be to make a call..start receiving data from isdn aoc-s...and hangup from sip side..
15:09.48sekiland see if it's there or not ..in the cdr
15:11.25*** join/#asterisk bitwize (~bitwize2@2-213-96-87.cust.blixtvik.se)
15:12.15sekilWIMPy: looking at chan_sip.c in 1.8.x ..there have been patches
15:12.51[TK]D-Fenderruben23, fix your file
15:16.16kaldemarruben23: you could always remove the warnings from format_wav.c:140, file.c:386 and res_musiconhold.c:261 but that would be idiotic. instead fix the problem you've made in your configuration or file usage.
15:20.43*** join/#asterisk zkn (~zkn@82.131.32.65.cable.starman.ee)
15:24.37*** join/#asterisk r33dtard (~r33dtard@gateway/tor-sasl/r33dtard)
15:26.53Kattyi can haz caffeines now plz?
15:27.21pigpennot only can you have it, it is highly recommended.
15:27.32Katty:>>>>
15:27.40WIMPyDrugs are bad!
15:28.07pigpenno doubt I need more (drugs and caffeine)
15:28.17pigpen(good drugs, not bad drugs)
15:28.27pigpenI guess that is relative.
15:28.59leifmadsendrugs are awesome, mmmk
15:29.03[TK]D-FenderStay in milk!
15:29.07[TK]D-FenderDon't do school!
15:29.12[TK]D-FenderDrink your drugs!
15:29.27Kattyhow can you have any pudding if you don't, drink your...caffeines?
15:30.01pigpenI had a friend who said he could write code better when he was high.  Now, he is a proud resident in Huntsville Prison.  ;-)
15:30.27Kattythose kinds of drugs are bad.
15:30.47pigpenheh, for your career.
15:31.01pigpenlife, health, etc...
15:31.08*** join/#asterisk ccesario (~ccesario@189.29.54.144)
15:31.15[TK]D-FenderOh please... prescription drugs kill infinitely more people than all illegal ones combines...
15:31.47[TK]D-FenderLets not even start on cigarettes & alcohol...
15:31.54pigpentrue.  true.  But you will do more time for the illegal ones.  (if you get caught that is)
15:32.25pigpenCoffee for that matter.  Legalized addictive drink.  (speaking of which, I need more...bad.)
15:32.30Katty[TK]D-Fender: that also falls into 'those kinds of drugs'
15:33.10pigpen[TK]D-Fender, I hope you are proud.  I am talking with you and not even asking you a single question.  Is that improvement or what?
15:33.21pigpenDam.  there's that question.
15:33.32Kattyi'd just ignore fender.
15:33.33[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, yes, the point was the reverse scale of demonization and criminalization...
15:33.42Kattyi meani do it all the time ;)
15:34.05Kattyi imagine if we ever /actually hung out/ i'd have to duct tape his mouth shut often.
15:34.22[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, http://smily-domination.webs.com/photos/Funny-Junk/shipment_of_fail.jpg
15:34.33pigpenMy wife would probably add me to to duct tape list.
15:35.07[TK]D-FenderKatty, Oh... you could try :)
15:35.27Kattyyou'd let me.
15:35.28pigpen[TK]D-Fender, cool.  Hmm?I wonder who the captain was.  I bet he went to work for a cruise line.
15:35.53[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, You followed the news about the Italian cruise ship from a few weeks ago?
15:36.21[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, Do you know how close they were to shore?
15:36.24pigpenA little.  Mostly thoughts how "I" would chop that ship up.
15:36.33pigpenFrom what I could tell about 300 yards
15:36.36[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, neither did their captain ;)
15:36.38*** join/#asterisk Kalidarn (~unknown@unaffiliated/kalidarn)
15:37.02pigpenhaha.  yeah.  he was being a dumbass.
15:37.25pigpenDid you like his comment?"I ran it aground so it wouldn't sink!!!"
15:39.12pigpenWikipedia definition of dumbass:  "See Captain Francesco Schettino."
15:39.27pigpenWell dam.  I need to work.
15:39.30Kattywas he that one guy that one meme was based off of
15:39.37Kattyone does not simply....
15:40.47pigpenYou watch, you will that ship on ebay.
15:40.49[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, the best was all of the news comparisons to being just like the Titanic... except for being a quick swim to shore off a mediterranean paradise :p
15:41.37pigpenheh, yeah.  No mention of succumbing to the freezing waters, ice, Leonardio DeCaprio, or anything.
15:41.41*** join/#asterisk ferdna (~yup@cpe-67-10-220-35.elp.res.rr.com)
15:41.57[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, And worst of all.... CELINE DION
15:42.28pigpenyeah.  true.
15:43.31pigpenToo bad Oprah wasn't on it.  The Titanic that is.
15:44.19[TK]D-FenderYeah.... Oprah was a huge pusher of junk science...
15:51.19*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
15:51.22*** join/#asterisk miztic (~miztic@75-149-203-105-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
15:54.31*** join/#asterisk KavanS (~KavanS@LINBIT/KavanS)
15:56.05*** join/#asterisk anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm)
16:09.07*** join/#asterisk dxd828 (~dxd828@host81-133-31-249.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
16:10.07*** join/#asterisk dxd828 (~dxd828@host81-133-31-249.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
16:10.47pigpen[TK]D-Fender, any luck hanging a fax machine off of a Audiocodes FXS using T38 to the asterisk box where it has a DAHDI PRI/Analog card?
16:11.27pigpenI know that I can do a fxs->fxo passthrough on the same unit and have faxes pass fine.
16:11.56[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, Not sure on * 10, but previous could not terminate T.38 with provided lib.  Spandsp was supposed to be capable fo this.  Coppice could fill you in on the particulars when he's about I'm sure...
16:12.27[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, I don't have any direct experience with T.38 to offer you though.
16:12.47*** join/#asterisk dxd828 (~dxd828@host81-133-31-249.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
16:12.59pigpenk, yeah I couldn't find much on T.38 on 1.8 and saw that 1.10 was to have some abilities built in.
16:13.24pigpenbut I am in the same boat.  I know it exists in the wild, but nothing of real implementation.
16:13.32pigpenI hate faxes.
16:15.48zknOK, so it's possible to use dial codes to pause the agent in the queue, suppose one needs more statuses other than only pause, how could that be implemented without using dial codes ? soft phones usually have also the option to specify account status but these seem to have no effect to Asterisk, what's the deal with that?
16:16.54[TK]D-Fenderzkn, Because * is not a SIP proxy and the concept of a device advertising its state like that isn't something that it supports on any protocol
16:17.07*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@corp.fuzecore.com)
16:17.21[TK]D-Fenderzkn, And "queue pause" is not the same thing as general SIP presence
16:17.49*** join/#asterisk wesphillips (~wphill04@137.237.233.124)
16:18.31zknso how is this achieved?
16:19.08[TK]D-Fenderzkn, It isn't
16:19.56*** join/#asterisk DefV (~Jan@node-hahmcop4no4a1ruk1w.ipv6.as30961.net)
16:20.33zknOK, so this is not possible with Asterisk
16:21.29DefVThis is probably the question most asked inhere, but can I setup a voip server with this card (http://www.modem-help.co.uk/Puretek/PT-3517-56k-Data-Fax-Speakerphone-PCI.html) to receive incoming calls over PSTN?
16:21.36Dovidis there any way of settign directrtp from the dial plan or only in a peer?
16:22.32QwellDefV: No.
16:22.46Qwellwait, what?
16:22.52Qwellpure voip?  with analog hardware?
16:23.15kaldemarDovid: for a peer, yes.
16:23.21Qwellneeds more coffee
16:23.26DefVwell no, incoming calls would be from a regular phone line
16:23.37QwellDefV: still no.  You need real telephony hardware.
16:23.50DefVOK
16:23.59DefVI figured as much, since I couldn't get it to work
16:24.04Qwellsomething like this, with an FXO, for example: http://www.digium.com/en/products/analog/4-port/
16:24.19DefVtnx for clarifying :-)
16:26.01DefVany affordable cards? :-)
16:27.21[TK]D-FenderDefV, Describe your precise needs and expectations
16:28.34DefVOK. At the moment we're doing regular phone'ing with a normal phone (PSTN, not ISDN). We have some fancy Cisco phones that do VOIP. I want all calls coming in over the phone line to be sent to the Cisco VOIP phones
16:28.39DefVand I have a server with hw
16:28.44DefVjust not a good voice card :-)
16:28.49kaldemarDefV: an ATA costs 10 times less. you could also use an ITSP for PSTN connectivity.
16:29.53[TK]D-FenderDefV, Linksys SPA-3102 ~$70 USD
16:30.00_Corey_DefV: For whatever it's worth, ISDN is not an alternative to the PSTN...
16:30.33WIMPyHuh? ISDN is PSTN.
16:30.52[TK]D-FenderOr at least a common tech for reaching it :)
16:31.24[TK]D-Fender<PROTECTED>
16:31.49DefVjup, sorry
16:32.01WIMPyThat would make more sense.
16:32.01DefVmy telecom provider calls it PSTN / ISDN
16:32.09DefVand I just copied that :-)
16:32.12*** join/#asterisk navaismo (~navaismo@189.249.54.116)
16:32.46_Corey_DefV: Well, make sure you actually have analog lines before you buy anything.  ISDN handoff requires different equipment...
16:32.51DefV[TK]D-Fender: well, I have some custom need, server accepting the voip also needs to call into an OpenVPN network and route to the phones
16:33.15DefV_Corey_: yeah, I'm sure it's analog and not ISDN
16:33.25WIMPyIf you have ISDN available, you should check that out. The interfaces are dead cheap.
16:33.32DefVI don't :-(
16:34.20[TK]D-FenderDefV, I was only asking about the PSTN interface requirements
16:35.37DefVso, to summarize, a card/hw that I can plug into a computer that Asterisk supports, I can plug my phone cable (POTS) into, and is affordable? :-)
16:39.28DefV*tumbleweed*
16:40.15*** join/#asterisk Nasga (~Nasga@199.79.125.78.rev.sfr.net)
16:40.29[TK]D-Fender<[TK]D-Fender> DefV, Linksys SPA-3102 ~$70 USD  <--------- please pay attention
16:40.33*** join/#asterisk Devon_ (~chatzilla@63.214.236.169)
16:42.06DefVah, sorry
16:42.48*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@dhcp-v022-248.mobile.uci.edu)
16:55.48*** join/#asterisk bn-7bc (bjarne@pdpc/supporter/active/bn-7bc)
16:58.18*** join/#asterisk shamelessn00b (~bwahahaha@host-130-net-107-160-119.mobilinkinfinity.net.pk)
17:07.20*** join/#asterisk Jimmy890 (~chatzilla@92.60.238.0)
17:25.15*** join/#asterisk xSmurf (~MrSmurf@unaffiliated/mrsmurf)
17:25.28*** join/#asterisk luckman212 (~irc@pool-108-41-8-176.nycmny.fios.verizon.net)
17:25.42*** join/#asterisk dxd828 (~dxd828@host81-133-31-249.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
17:26.56*** join/#asterisk krotos (~d3v1l@87.13.67.112)
17:27.11krotoshi all :)
17:30.01WIMPylo you
17:31.08*** join/#asterisk ketas-ts (~ketas@62.65.215.151.cable.starman.ee)
17:31.36*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@82-168-115-40.ip.telfort.nl)
17:33.20*** join/#asterisk serafie (~erin@75.76.38.159)
17:35.13*** part/#asterisk DefV (~Jan@node-hahmcop4no4a1ruk1w.ipv6.as30961.net)
17:38.11*** join/#asterisk cekz (~pascal@hq.kontego.net)
17:39.16*** join/#asterisk BitBandit (~taggmcd@67.148.7.130)
17:49.27*** join/#asterisk NightMonkey (~NightMonk@pdpc/supporter/professional/nightmonkey)
17:55.13*** join/#asterisk fisted (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
18:01.31*** join/#asterisk danols_work (~sokolowsk@72.38.184.18)
18:04.51*** join/#asterisk akrohn (~akrohn@38.101.60.42)
18:20.51krotoshei guys, i need a confirmation about a rtp . If user A and B are both registered on Asterisk Box K. all with canreinvite=no, directmedia=no. If a call b the rtp stream follow this path? A-->rtp-->K-->rtp-->B
18:20.56krotosright?
18:22.19*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@183178203098.ctinets.com)
18:22.35[TK]D-Fenderkrotos, Correct
18:23.46krotos[TK]D-Fender: thankyou :) So i can prioritize VoIP simple marking packet that have ip to my Asterisk Box
18:36.54*** join/#asterisk creativx (~creadurex@226.62-97-205.bkkb.no)
18:42.50*** join/#asterisk tm1000 (~tm1000@provisioner.net)
18:49.48*** part/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-benawpehpbbajqnr)
18:52.05*** join/#asterisk NightMonkey (~NightMonk@pdpc/supporter/professional/nightmonkey)
18:54.32*** join/#asterisk talntid (~t@173-160-189-58-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
18:54.57talntidBest SIP provider for a call center environment?
18:57.04[TK]D-FenderThe same as for a non-call-center environment
19:08.44*** part/#asterisk ruben23 (~RLACUMBA@121.97.111.142)
19:11.47akrohnthis might be a dumb question, but if it's a call center, why not just get a PRI? What's cost diff between PRI and SIP provider? Maybe I only say that because I dislike 'cloud' services.
19:15.33[TK]D-FenderSIP provider != cloud.  And cost is an obvious factor.
19:18.28cekzakrohn, there could be long distance fees, and many more reasons
19:20.01akrohngood call on the LD fees cekz, hadn't considered that. [TK]D-Fender I know it's not cloud per sae, but because of customers, I find myself referring to everything that isn't sitting in my datacenter to be the 'cloud' =/
19:23.54[TK]D-FenderYou should smack that guy :)
19:26.52talntidI currently have a PRI
19:26.56talntidit sucks.
19:27.00talntidthe provider sucks
19:27.12talntidso, I want to switch to SIP.
19:32.49[TK]D-Fender"it sucks" <- care to qualify that a bit?
19:33.05p3nguinOr at least quantify it.
19:34.35[TK]D-Fenderp3nguin, I would never expect any math skills given the source ;)
19:34.49p3nguinPoor guy.
19:39.38*** join/#asterisk angryuser_laptop (~angryuser@2a01:e34:ee09:8850:c872:3823:8b:2b90)
19:40.11*** join/#asterisk fireman_biff (~biff@65.48.133.102)
19:40.44fireman_biffHi, is there a way to check from the Asterisk CLI if software echo cancellation is being used on a DAHDI channel?
19:40.47*** part/#asterisk fireman_biff (~biff@65.48.133.102)
19:40.56wdoekes2lol
19:41.01*** join/#asterisk fireman_biff (~biff@65.48.133.102)
19:42.41[TK]D-Fenderfireman_biff, Do you have HWEC?
19:43.36fireman_biff[TK]D-Fender: Yes, but they users say they're getting echo, so I'm wondering if both software and hardware are in use
19:43.52[TK]D-FenderNo, HWEC only.  You don't get to override it if it's there
19:44.35fireman_biffso what should I check if they have echo with hwec?
19:44.39fireman_biffthe gain?
19:45.27[TK]D-Fenderfor starters.
19:46.22fireman_biffI would want to decrease both the rx and tx right?
19:46.35[TK]D-FenderI'd start at 0 across the board first.
19:46.46[TK]D-FenderAnd make sure the HWEC is indeed properly ack'd
19:47.17fireman_biffhow do i check the hwec?
19:48.15*** join/#asterisk bbourdage (~bbourdage@75-150-221-205-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
19:49.26[TK]D-FenderDepends on what you've got.
20:01.04fireman_biff[TK]D-Fender: any idea how i would check for an analog rhino card?
20:05.38*** join/#asterisk kessius (~cassio@186.206.8.118)
20:06.35[TK]D-FenderEWWWWW
20:06.39[TK]D-Fender"no"
20:16.29*** join/#asterisk jzaw (~jzaw@macbook.dzki.co.uk)
20:22.23*** join/#asterisk bn-7bc (bjarne@pdpc/supporter/active/bn-7bc)
20:32.22talntid[TK]D-Fender, I could talk about the symptoms as to why it sucks, and then you can tell me that it is a configuration issue, or that I am not doing it right. so why? Hired 3 different people to check it out. Still fucks up.
20:33.05[TK]D-Fendertalntid, And I could ask 10 times and probably not get a clear coherent answer with all the pertinent details...
20:34.30fireman_biffis reloading asterisk enough to put into effect changes to rx/tx gain?
20:34.59talntidsometimes, people don't know all the pertinent details to provide you. Not everyone is as experienced as you. For some people, this is the only PRI they have ever tried, and maybe they don't know everything about how to do it right.
20:35.09[TK]D-Fenderreload chan_dahdi
20:35.18fireman_biff[TK]D-Fender: thanks
20:35.19[TK]D-Fenderbase reload = no.  And this WILL drop calls
20:35.40[TK]D-Fendertalntid, Yes, but you continue to give none....
20:36.10talntid[TK]D-Fender, every few days, my PRI shows "channel unavailable". an asterisk restart fixes it.
20:37.46talntidI'll go back and grab a log, if you think you can help
20:38.55talntid[Jan 30 09:44:28] WARNING[27227] app_dial.c: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap' (cause 34 - Circuit/channel congestion)
20:38.59talntidthat is what shows up, over and over.
20:39.00[TK]D-Fendertalntid, * version?  Card?
20:39.36[TK]D-FenderCause 34 is often used as an actual "busy" by some telcos and shows that the other side is at least getting the request.
20:39.42[TK]D-Fenderand "Zap" tells me a lot already...
20:39.44talntidAsterisk 1.4.17, on Ubuntu. Reason Asterisk is so old is because I have not been able to successfully upgrade it AND get the zaptel stuff working again
20:39.48[TK]D-FenderCarbon-dated.....
20:40.25talntidand it's a sangoma... A200
20:40.42[TK]D-Fender....
20:40.57[TK]D-FenderA200 = analog... how are you getting a ISDN cause-code back from that>?
20:41.17talntid02:01.0 Network controller: Sangoma Technologies Corp. A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card
20:41.52talntidI don't know a ton about how PRI's work.. what I know is this:
20:42.04talntidI have a "voip gateway" box, in my rack...
20:42.14talntidit has an internet connection going into it..
20:42.24talntidand it has an output, which goes to the card in my asterisk box
20:42.34[TK]D-FenderA200 = analog.. so how the hell is this a PRI issue?
20:43.17talntidsee, this is where I'm not sure what you are asking. I don't know shit about PRI, and why the card being analog is a "duh" moment for you.
20:43.42[TK]D-FenderYou'd done the equivalent of asking where the gas-tank is on your bicycle...
20:43.53[TK]D-FenderA200 = analog.  Not digital circuit.  Not a PRI.
20:44.09[TK]D-FenderAnd you've not hinted at something else that may be relaetd...
20:44.57*** join/#asterisk chigambamukoko (~chatzilla@fl-76-3-22-71.dhcp.embarqhsd.net)
20:45.05talntidso I'm guessing what is happening is....
20:45.38talntidPBX (digital) -> Sangoma (Analog) -> Voip Gateway Input (Analog) -> Voip Gateway Output (Digital) -> Provider
20:46.16[TK]D-FenderThat makes no sense.....
20:46.32[TK]D-Fenderfor PRI.
20:46.42talntidhttp://www.accessline.com/smartvoiceservice/interior.asp?nav=nHIW
20:46.57[TK]D-FenderAnd You're using an A200 to reach a gatway that turns it right back to some digital format?  That is retarded...
20:47.34talntidYeah, I built it 5 years ago. I didn't/don't know the difference between PRI's and what I should have, etc...
20:47.43talntidhence, wanting to go SIP. I know what that is.
20:48.03talntidI think there are too many wrong steps out/in
20:48.05[TK]D-FenderThere is no PRI.  You introduced that term with nothing backing it up.
20:48.09talntidok.
20:48.14talntidthat's how it was sold to me
20:48.24[TK]D-FenderIt seems to have been lodged in there for years.
20:48.36talntidbuzzwords.
20:48.58*** join/#asterisk akrohn (~akrohn@38.101.60.42)
20:49.09[TK]D-FenderNo, not a "buzz" word.  A technical word that will get you killed like mistaking hydrochloric acid for water and taking a big gulp
20:49.30talntidI don't know what else to call something that was introduced to me as a PRI.
20:49.37[TK]D-Fendertalntid, Ask your provider what protocol their gatway is talking and get * to talk direct to the provider and do away with all that conversion nonsense
20:49.56talntidI know that they don't support SIP. I have asked them that
20:50.03talntidbut yeah, I can ask them
20:50.19[TK]D-FenderOdds are H.323
20:50.37[TK]D-FenderWhich you could probably get away with for this need.
20:50.53talntidhttp://www.shopmania.co.za/phones-faxes/p-quintum-dx-4120-rack-mount-4-e1-voip-gateway-120-channels-1787678
20:51.01talntidthat's what I have in the rack.. they provided that.
20:51.25[TK]D-FenderThat is a GIANT f'n gateway... and a digital one.
20:51.28[TK]D-FenderA200 = analog.
20:51.36[TK]D-Fenderagain the pieces do not add up
20:52.29talntidmight not be that exact model. But it is the same brand, and looks the same. I'm not on-site, so I can't get exact model
20:54.10*** join/#asterisk [ALT][F4] (~altf4@ppp-58-11-96-124.revip2.asianet.co.th)
20:54.40[TK]D-FenderWas that a peanut allergy I had... or a penicillin?  Guess I'll just take an aspirin
20:54.42[TK]D-Fenderdies
20:56.53[TK]D-Fenderwanpipe configs should tell you this already along with the rest of their CLI suite.
20:57.20[TK]D-FenderAnd you're no doubt on a seriously decrepit version of their driver as well..
20:59.01talntidyeah. Seems they no longer maintain packages for it
20:59.22p3nguinIf they have a gateway on site, tell them to replace it with a SIP gateway so you can use SIP over Ethernet between it and Asterisk.
20:59.36kessius* Does not register for incoming calls
20:59.46p3nguinkessius: Do you want it to?
20:59.58pigpenI was just informed that I need to be able to connect a Musac streaming music via a headphone/rca cable into Asterisk's music on hold.  The catch is, I would need to have it be a usb audio input.  Asterisk 1.8.7+  Doable?
21:00.04pigpenI have never done it.
21:01.00[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, Sure.
21:01.20[TK]D-Fenderpigpen, there are docs for taking an ALSO line-in as MoH.
21:01.22pigpenjust any usb linux supported sound card and a special config?
21:01.23[TK]D-FenderALSA*
21:01.24p3nguinI missed where you got from a headphone or other coaxial audio cable to a USB cable.
21:01.49pigpenALSA, yeah, that's right.
21:01.55QwellUSB doesn't matter, it's just a soundcard
21:02.02Qwellat least as far as Asterisk is concerned.
21:02.09pigpenk, didn't know if it mattered to asterisk.
21:02.33pigpenthen just pass it into asterisk via the moh config.
21:02.42pigpenEasy enough.
21:02.43pigpentks.
21:03.05talntidHad a person onsite check the exact model, [TK]... DX2030
21:03.59[TK]D-Fendertalntid, Looking like yuo have no clue on what card you have.
21:04.11[TK]D-Fenderlook at your wanpipe config sand the hwprobe
21:04.49*** join/#asterisk binbash_ (~peter@server.digitog.nl)
21:05.59talntidhttp://pastebin.com/rpZ3Xt1p
21:09.49talntidand my lspci says: 02:01.0 Network controller: Sangoma Technologies Corp. A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card
21:12.37talntidI get the impression that these pieces of hardware aren't supposed to work together.
21:14.28[TK]D-FenderThat config is clearly not analog
21:14.39[TK]D-Fenderwanroute hwprobe
21:14.42[TK]D-Fenderwanrouter hwprobe
21:14.43[TK]D-Fender^^
21:15.00talntidhttp://pastebin.com/kk5dicE6
21:15.18[TK]D-FenderAFT-A101-SH : SLOT=1 : BUS=2 : IRQ=5 : CPU=A : PORT=1 : HWEC=32 : V=34
21:15.24[TK]D-FenderA101 != A200
21:15.37[TK]D-FenderThat is their oldest 1-port T1/E1 interface
21:16.00talntidwas $800ish back in the day. heh
21:16.12[TK]D-FenderTDMV_HWEC       = YES
21:16.12talntidI also had a Rhino r1t1 card too...
21:16.16talntidbut couldn't get it to work
21:16.20[TK]D-FenderOdd... A101 didn't have HWEC
21:16.24[TK]D-Fenderthis shouldn't be there
21:16.32talntidyeah
21:16.37talntidecho cancellation right?
21:16.55talntid"Choose the Sangoma A101D and A101DE, equiped with world class DSP hardware to achieve carrier-grade echo cancellation and voice quality enhancement functions for your telephone systems."
21:17.01[TK]D-FenderA101d did, but that came after the A104d was first introduced (fall 2005).
21:17.24[TK]D-FenderIt should list as a "d"...
21:17.36[TK]D-Fenderanyway, I'll leave that be for a bit.
21:17.48talntidI do recall buying it specifically because it did have echo cancellation
21:17.54[TK]D-Fenderenable PRI debug when you start getting the congestion warnings and PB a sample.
21:18.24talntidk
21:18.47talntidpri debug span 1?
21:19.34[TK]D-Fenderlooks right
21:20.38talntidheh, turned it on. now trying to figure out how to turn it off
21:21.46talntidoh well. it's fine running
21:22.54talntidso, does this setup make more sense now?
21:23.04talntidor is it still a clusterfck? :)
21:23.17[TK]D-FenderWell... it's still wasted hardware...
21:23.21[TK]D-Fenderbut at least it adds up.
21:23.39[TK]D-FenderNot an A200.  Is an A101.  That makes sense... in a "you could..." way
21:24.52talntidgotcha
21:25.00talntidwonder why lspci shows a A200
21:28.09[TK]D-FenderNo idea... and on that note... checkout time.  Long walk home.
21:28.11[TK]D-FenderBBL
21:28.27talntidhave a good one
21:29.51*** join/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-benawpehpbbajqnr)
21:29.52*** mode/#asterisk [+o mjordan] by ChanServ
21:33.50pabelangerkessius: ask here!
21:37.04leifmadsenQwell: ping
21:37.10Qwellpong?
21:37.21leifmadsenyou're going to hate this question...
21:37.30leifmadsenbut what are you calling the asterisk 10 RPMs (what is your file naming convention?)
21:37.39QwellThey are all asterisk now
21:37.46Qwellsee the new asterisk-1.8, asterisk-10 repos
21:37.48leifmadsenseparate repos?
21:37.50Qwellyep
21:38.06leifmadsenok, and how do you handle having both 1.4 and 1.8 repos enabled at the same time? (or do you just, not?)
21:38.09QwellI did that to fix exactly that problem
21:38.16QwellI used to call them asterisk14, asterisk18
21:38.18leifmadsenI'm trying to figure out Requires: stuff
21:38.24Qwellbut those were screwy
21:38.27leifmadsenya
21:38.37Qwelloh, how do I handle them being enabled.  it doesn't matter
21:38.57leifmadsenI have a Requires: asterisk-devel >= 1.4.19 in an addons RPM and it's finding the 1.8.8.2 I created
21:39.04pabelangerleifmadsen: separate repos is the way to go, unless you some how plan to run both version of asterisk at the same time
21:39.13QwellI think you can do like
21:39.28QwellRequires: asterisk-devel >= 1.4.19 && asterisk-devel <= 1.6
21:39.30Qwellor something
21:39.32*** join/#asterisk lanning (~lanning@173-8-187-197-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
21:39.40leifmadsenQwell: ok I was thinking about that too, trying
21:39.47Qwellmight be &
21:42.44leifmadsenQwell: I think that is illegal, but rpmlint doesn't complain about something liek asterisk >= 1.4.19, asterisk < 1.6
21:43.00p3nguintalntid: lspci -Qs 02:01.0
21:45.00p3nguinOr, actually, lspci -Qs 02:01
21:45.45saxahi , anybody willing to help me out of a no audio problem ? The phone is behind a nat and the server is behind another nat. I opened the ports 5060 and 10000-10200 UDP I get the phone registered, it rings, calls but audio doesnt goes thru. Interesting is that it was working perfectly, until I added another port in the port forwarding on the sserver side modem/router.
21:46.19saxaI already tried many things, and cant understand where the problem occurs ?
21:50.02p3nguinsaxa: Perhaps that is the wrong port range.  The typical range is 10000-20000 until changed to something else.
21:53.58saxap3nguin: i added this port range in rtp.conf
21:54.18saxathere is one problem, my modem permits me to open max 256 ports
21:54.26saxaHuawei HG521
21:54.52Qwellso then limit your port range to 256
21:56.02saxaso I  opened from 10000 to 10200
21:56.30leifmadsendid you reload asterisk after your changes? did you look at the sip trace to see what ports the audio is being setup on?
21:59.13krotoshi all! :) I'm having a small problem with a OpenVox B400p/B200p . Should i use wcb4xxp driver for this card?
21:59.47*** join/#asterisk k-man_ (~jason@unaffiliated/k-man)
21:59.48Qwellkrotos: Ask the vendor.
21:59.55Qwellthat driver does not explicitly support that card
21:59.59saxaleifmadsen: yes i restarted it many times, after each change
22:00.32saxathe audio is sent on 5074, 5004 , random ports
22:00.32k-man_when i call my linksys phone from my iphone voip client, on the linksys it says incomming from "jasonsiphone" rather than the extension number - is there any way to show the extensionnumber?
22:00.49saxathose are just some of them i could see
22:02.00p3nguink-man_: Fix the callerid value.
22:02.28krotosQwell: ok..
22:02.58p3nguink-man_: Typically, something like this:  callerid=Jason iPhone <1234>
22:06.35*** join/#asterisk Gaiax (be19ebae@gateway/web/freenode/ip.190.25.235.174)
22:10.04k-man_p3nguin: thanks heaps! that did the trick
22:13.45*** join/#asterisk evil_gordita (robert@ip70-188-50-186.rn.hr.cox.net)
22:17.03*** join/#asterisk wwalker (~wwalker@208.92.232.27)
22:18.34wwalkerdoes anyone have a SQL tool that reads CDRs and outputs some set of "port in use, start time, end time" ?
22:19.17saxaok I see now the audio is sent on 10010
22:19.23saxasee here
22:19.26saxahttp://pastebin.ca/2108306
22:19.36saxathe client is casasip
22:19.37*** part/#asterisk wesphillips (~wphill04@137.237.233.124)
22:20.07saxahmm, let me check my router on the client side
22:22.28saxahttp://pastebin.ca/2108314
22:22.38saxathis is a second call I did right now
22:23.47saxaI have also opened on my client side nat the ports 5060 TCP/UDP and 10000-10200 UDP
22:38.06p3nguinYou should never need to forward ports for a phone.
22:38.34p3nguinIf asterisk is configured to support NAT, a phone behind a NAT should work correctly.
22:43.31saxahttp://pastebin.ca/2108347 <--- thats a sip set debug on
22:44.08saxaok I can get off those open ports on the client side nat
22:44.37saxaclient side nat is the router I have at home, where casasip sits behind it.
22:46.14*** join/#asterisk fireman_biff (~biff@65.48.133.102)
22:47.44*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@64.235.218.194)
22:59.12*** part/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-benawpehpbbajqnr)
23:03.14*** join/#asterisk [ALT][F4]1 (~altf4@180.183.125.177)
23:15.54*** join/#asterisk chasing`Sol (~cS@197.132.90.181)
23:17.11saxap3nguin: so the opened ports should be only on the router in front of asterisk server ?
23:18.23p3nguinIn my experience, where you have asterisk behind one NAT and a phone behind a different NAT, it is sufficient to only forward the relevant ports inbound to asterisk.
23:19.19p3nguinThis is how I have my own system deployed.  I have asterisk behind a NAT and phones behind another NAT.  Port forwarding is done only on the asterisk side.
23:19.37*** join/#asterisk Maliuta (~nobusines@kiev.lusan.id.au)
23:19.49saxaok, i see
23:20.25saxai have removed the opened ports
23:20.42saxaand in fact it works the same way it was, still no audio :)
23:20.47saxabut it registers
23:21.05p3nguinMake sure you to not have any ALG enabled anywhere.  Also, make sure your phone is not trying to do NAT traversal on its own -- allow asterisk to handle it.
23:21.31Maliutano audio sounds like no RTP is getting through
23:22.39p3nguinThat is a very astute observation.
23:23.48Maliutaalthough all audio sounds like something ;P
23:24.23p3nguinEven the silence is deafening at times.
23:25.57Maliutaplays p3nguin the "Sounds of Silence"
23:30.17saxap3nguin: so I should disable STUN on my phone ?
23:31.01p3nguinIf you need STUN, use it.  But you may not need it.
23:31.42saxaNAT Traversal (STUN):   No     No, but send keep-alive     Yes
23:32.19saxai had this enable before it stopped to work.
23:33.23saxawhat is rfc3581 used for ?
23:33.36saxasymetricrouting
23:34.32kessiusgood night greetings
23:34.45saxanight kessius
23:35.26kessiusfriend back question, asterik no registred   - rule register=user:password@domain:port/extension
23:39.29kessiusasterisk has face from internet ? I need help, brothers - i am novice on asterisk
23:39.42[TK]D-FenderTalks does funny Yoda hhhhmmmmmMMMMMM??!?!?!?
23:40.36[TK]D-Fenderkessius: "sip set debug on" <- look at your registration attempt
23:42.22kessiusok I will see - i post Fender
23:42.41[TK]D-Fender~pb
23:42.41infobot[~pb] A "pastebin" is a web-based service where you should paste anything over 3 lines so you don't flood the channel. Here are links to a few: http://www.pastebin.com , http://pastebin.us , http://pastebin.ca , http://channels.debian.net/paste , http://paste.lisp.org , http://bin.cakephp.org/ , http://asterisk.pastey.net/ ; or install pastebinit with yum or aptitude.
23:42.42[TK]D-Fender^^^
23:44.46Maliuta[TK]D-Fender. He's the Obi Wan of #astersik
23:45.07Maliuta"Search your heart ... you know it to be true."
23:49.08*** join/#asterisk nfsnobody (~whitey@ppp191-96.static.internode.on.net)
23:49.16nfsnobodyhey all
23:50.25nfsnobodyI've recently upgraded from asterisk 1.6 to 1.8 and I use MySQL Realtime for my queue_log for the purposes of custom applications. It seems the data structure has changed to a pipe delimited data field (e.g. 1|834|23|) instead of seperate fields (data1 is 1, data2 is 834, data3 is 23, etc) - can anyone point me in the right direction of fixing this?
23:50.59nfsnobodyI could update all my MySQL triggers to suit this, but I strongly feel that the seperate fields is the better way, as well as worrying about the consistency of my old and new data
23:51.18*** part/#asterisk fireman_biff (~biff@65.48.133.102)
23:52.28nfsnobodyI'm wondering if there's a setting somewhere that I'd set on the old version that I haven't on the new version, as this doesn't seem to be a bug fix or feature
23:54.13nfsnobodyany ideas anyone? I'm willing to try whatever needs trying :)
23:54.57kessiusno registered *  - sip set debug on OK  -   where look  ->  registration attempt ?
23:57.18[TK]D-Fenderkessius: Yes
23:58.22[TK]D-Fender"sip show registry" <- this will show is * even saw your config files having a register directive in the right place.  Then SIP debug should show the actual attempts

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.