IRC log for #asterisk on 20101110

00:00.43KingDavidNYCectopaspam: excuse me, shouldn't it be span=2,1,0,esf,b8zs, since 1=far end T1 provides the clock?
00:01.13ectospasmKingDavidNYC: that's variable.  It depends on which is the primary clock source, which you didn't specify
00:01.36ectospasmKingDavidNYC: I assumed you wanted the first span to be primary clock source, so timing for the second is 2
00:01.52ectospasm...if the second span is primary clock source, use 1
00:02.00*** join/#asterisk tcliam_ (~liam@203.109.157.87)
00:02.30ectospasm"primary clock source" meaning that span is the primary receiver of timing for the entire card
00:02.49KingDavidNYCectospasm: I think in the question says they want the 2nd T1 on a 4 port T1 card to do the clocking
00:03.01ectospasmKingDavidNYC: then use 1
00:03.27tcliam_Hi I am trying to use fail2ban with asterisk. I have set it up to ban after 5 attempts but it seems that it is too slow to detect hack attempts fast enough. I had an attempt today and fail2ban reported that it banned after "55" attempts rather than 5 attempts. Does anyone know of any info out there on this problem?
00:03.28ectospasm...although a 2 without a 1 in another span will work.
00:03.36KingDavidNYCectospasm: great, thanks, and waht about chan_dahdi.conf?
00:03.50ectospasmKingDavidNYC: you need at least signalling=pri_cpe; switchtype=national; and channel => 25-47;  << all in chan_dahdi.conf
00:04.24ectospasmKingDavidNYC: that's at minimum, but you will want other stuff (like echocancel, group, etc.)
00:05.11KingDavidNYCThanks a lot guys, please help me with one more question: Configure the 4th T1 on a 4 port T1 card as e&m with the first 10 channels in group 5 and the rest in group 11 . Show the relevant section in both chan_dahdi.conf and system.conf
00:05.45ManxPowerDoes anyone happen to know what the maximum length of a sip secret in Asterisk?
00:05.49ectospasmKingDavidNYC: span in system.conf will be similar
00:06.36ectospasminstead of dchan and bchan you'll have e&m=73-96
00:07.11KingDavidNYCectospasm: can you please write it for me?, as it will look in chan_dahdi, and system.conf?
00:07.15plut0ok google voice calls are broken, nothing to do with asterisk
00:07.31tymanManxPower: Didn't find explicitly, but the username max is 255 char and is "probably" same
00:07.48ectospasmKingDavidNYC: hold on.
00:08.19KingDavidNYCectopspasm: thanks man, this is the kind of thing you have to do once, to get it right
00:08.50KingDavidNYCectospasm: mere theory just doesn't cut it
00:08.57*** join/#asterisk Mhaddog (~Mhaddog@z65-50-116-17.ips.direcpath.com)
00:09.33*** join/#asterisk Carlos_PHX_ (~Carlos@ip68-99-199-10.ph.ph.cox.net)
00:11.01ectospasmKingDavidNYC:  http://pastebin.com/8fz376r0
00:12.36KingDavidNYCectospasm: awsome! thanks a lot man!, I owe you lunch!!
00:13.17ectospasmKingDavidNYC: that's not guaranteed to be correct, you may want to compare that with what you'll find on the various Asterisk wikis
00:13.41ectospasm(e.g. voip-info.org, wiki.asterisk.org)
00:14.36KingDavidNYCectospasm: correct, in any case it is a terrific answer, thanks again
00:15.51ectospasmKingDavidNYC:  I will admit my E&M configuration fu is rusty
00:16.01KingDavidNYCmmm
00:16.09ectospasm...and there are a bunch of E&M signalling types
00:16.25KingDavidNYCI will check it out....it is better than mine :)
00:17.06ectospasmjust curious, where are you interviewing?
00:17.45ectospasmKingDavidNYC: ^
00:19.28KingDavidNYCWashingto DC.. they want a person with knowledge of pri installations, signalings, C, dialplan, etc.... asterisk guy
00:23.15*** join/#asterisk atan (~atan@unaffiliated/atan)
00:23.30ectospasmAh, OK
00:24.57*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
00:28.40*** join/#asterisk qubix (qubix@unaffiliated/qubix)
00:43.36*** join/#asterisk digitalirony (www-data@my.ass.looks.just.like.your-face.info)
00:44.00*** join/#asterisk rrb3942 (~rbullock@cpe-67-242-215-62.rochester.res.rr.com)
00:51.46*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
00:58.15mlsmith9999DIDForSale... Yay or Nay?
00:58.27p3nguin_Never heard of it.
00:59.28mlsmith9999what is a good DID supplier?
01:00.01p3nguin_Wholesale or for personal/business use?
01:00.10mlsmith9999business
01:00.17p3nguin_What country?
01:00.36mlsmith9999US
01:00.52p3nguin_Do you only want phone numbers, or do you want VoIP services too?
01:01.31mlsmith9999have phone number, need them ported so VoIP services.
01:01.48p3nguin_~itsplist-us
01:01.49infobotHere are some popular ITSPs (USA) starting with the more respected ones: http://www.teliax.com , http://www.voicepulse.com/connect/ , http://www.broadvoice.com , http://www.jnctn.com , http://www.bandwidth.com , http://vitelity.net , http://voip.ms and http://flowroute.com
01:02.55aidinbsomeone's gotta bump flowroute up on that thang
01:03.06*** join/#asterisk a1fa (~a1fa@unaffiliated/a1fa)
01:03.20p3nguin_In addition to those, there are also plenty of others, but we don't know every ITSP that exists.
01:03.28p3nguin_I personally use VoIP.ms for my DIDs, and I use both VoIP.ms and Flowroute for termination.
01:05.11tymanhas anyone here used the polycom "kirk" phones with asterisk? any comments or alternate recommendations before I shell out some dough?
01:05.12atanAnyone here mess with skinny? This is my config for the phone http://pastie.org/private/0ehj1kfzt4h10gdasah5q
01:05.21atanand the phone just keeps pulling it off the tftp agian & again
01:05.31atanI assume I am missing something
01:07.04p3nguin_That looks like it should be your XMLDefault.cnf.xml.
01:07.09mlsmith9999ok, I'll check some of those out.. I wish I could go with Vitelity, but they can't port my number... 501-803
01:07.41atanp3nguin_, new config http://pastie.org/private/0dbqevsbxd8a4a9fsgbmw
01:07.54atanJust swapped it for something I found while googling
01:08.21p3nguin_That still looks like it should be your XMLDefault.cnf.xml.
01:08.38p3nguin_What version of the sccp image do you have?
01:08.50atanP00308000600 is what I just put on the phone
01:09.18p3nguin_I run P00308010200 here.
01:10.15atanDoes the 7940/7960 support P00308010200?
01:10.26p3nguin_That's what I'm using it on.
01:11.34atanAny chance you would sneak me a look at your SEP<mac>.cnf.xml setup?
01:13.05p3nguin_XMLDefault.cnf.xml  http://pastebin.com/6BdtBJc3
01:13.23*** join/#asterisk a1fa (~a1fa@unaffiliated/a1fa)
01:14.03p3nguin_SEP<mac>.cnf.xml  http://pastebin.com/3f6mGFqX
01:14.19p3nguin_There really isn't very much info in either file.
01:17.01p3nguin_If you have those two files and the four files for the firmware, I'd expect it to load up and work.
01:17.24atanI replaced my files with your xml setup there
01:17.27atanjust reloading it now
01:17.36p3nguin_I also have DISTINCTIVERINGLIST.XML and RINGLIST.XML for my ringers.
01:18.00*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
01:19.41atanWhat does your skinny.conf look like for them?
01:19.50p3nguin_I use chan_sccp-b.
01:19.56atanHmm.
01:20.06p3nguin_(sccp.conf)
01:20.26p3nguin_The samples are very well documented.
01:21.34p3nguin_http://chan-sccp-b.sourceforge.net/download.shtml#Subversion
01:22.19*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
01:24.05*** join/#asterisk tamiel (~tamiel@ip-175.net-89-3-223.rev.numericable.fr)
01:25.09atanWell perhaps I should get chan-sccp-b going then to replace the default one installed.
01:26.03p3nguin_I use it on Asterisk 1.4 because chan_skinny isn't very robust.  Maybe it has been further developed in other branches.
01:27.45p3nguin_I'm using chan-sccp-b v3 svn rev2094 on Asterisk 1.4.36, and I'm pretty happy with it overall.
01:28.48tymanp3nguin: does * operate in full proxy mode if all your phones are using sccp? does that extend the concurrency of * comparable to, say, cisco ccm?
01:29.02p3nguin_I don't know what "full proxy mode" is.
01:29.23tymani'm mean, not b2bua like * does by default with sip
01:29.35p3nguin_Well, Asterisk is a b3bua.
01:29.40p3nguin_err.
01:29.49p3nguin_b2bua
01:29.50tymanback to back user agent
01:29.58p3nguin_typo
01:30.21p3nguin_It's a b2bua no matter what channel technology you are using.
01:30.34p3nguin_Asterisk is not a proxy.
01:30.56atanI feel so silly right now.
01:31.08atanHow do I best setup chan-sccp-b?
01:31.08p3nguin_typo in a conf?
01:31.11p3nguin_oh
01:31.27p3nguin_Did you check out the latest revision with svn?
01:31.47atanNo. I did not. Is there some svn link?
01:31.48tymanreally...ok...thought you could use sccp similarly as with directrtpsetup=yes
01:31.55p3nguin_(1921.33) <p3nguin_> http://chan-sccp-b.sourceforge.net/download.shtml#Subversion
01:31.59p3nguin_that  ^^^
01:32.26atanAhh crud! None for 1.8 then?
01:33.05p3nguin_I'd try it anyway.
01:34.14atanconfigure: Or run ./configure --with-asterisk=PATH
01:34.24atanwould this be /usr/sbin/asterisk ?
01:35.10p3nguin_Just run ./configure
01:35.14*** join/#asterisk simplydrew (~simplydre@pool-96-238-59-82.prvdri.fios.verizon.net)
01:35.26atanCOnfigured error'd out with that message at the end
01:35.26p3nguin_After you checked out, of course.  svn co https://chan-sccp-b.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/chan-sccp-b/trunk chan-sccp-b
01:36.32atanuses your svn link
01:36.33p3nguin_I just use ./configure and it works for me.
01:37.08atanhttp://pastie.org/private/xi8ffxe2i9q8jmjcqwoa
01:37.57atangrabbed asterisk-dev, trying again
01:38.14atanWe're cooking with gas now.
01:39.06*** join/#asterisk thansen (~thansen@c-98-202-28-239.hsd1.ut.comcast.net)
01:39.44p3nguin_<PROTECTED>
01:39.57p3nguin_That's the one that checked ou for me.
01:40.43p3nguin_To upgrade or not to upgrade...
01:40.52carrarpeer pressure
01:40.56carrareveryone is doing it
01:41.03p3nguin_Might as well upgrade.  I can always go back if it's broken.
01:43.45p3nguin_Seems okay.
01:48.11*** join/#asterisk pinoyskull (~pinoyskul@112.198.64.90)
01:49.09atanOkay got chan_sccp-b all setup & loaded
01:49.18atanIt shows up in module show like sccp
01:49.23atanand the other module is now not loading
01:52.18*** join/#asterisk a1fa (~a1fa@unaffiliated/a1fa)
01:52.46*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
01:54.59atanOkay the phone is going wacky =\ still can't get online there with it
01:55.09atanJust keeps pulling files down =(
01:56.54atanI suppose I could stick with SIP for it but I really wanted these little sidecar things to work =) they seem quite interesting
02:02.05*** join/#asterisk a1fa (~a1fa@unaffiliated/a1fa)
02:06.38atanFoolish me. It was the firewall preventing such activities. Hmm.
02:06.46atanNow to figure out how to deal with that one, eeeep.
02:10.25atanhey p3nguin_ , if you're still here, what does the chan_sccp-b have that the default one doesn't? Do you happen to know if it supports the expansion modules whereas the other doesn't?
02:23.42*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
02:26.13*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
02:34.05*** join/#asterisk csnook (~chris@209-6-38-66.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com)
02:38.01*** join/#asterisk Preytell (~jerry.win@24-171-5-61.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com)
02:38.21p3nguin_atan: It does support the 7914 addon.
02:38.55atanMy 7914 lights are all red =\ trying to figure out how to push some firmware to the thing
02:39.22atanMost of the post I have read all refer to using ccm
02:41.44p3nguin_Did you configure your phone in sccp.conf?
02:42.29p3nguin_Wow, 855 toll-free numbers are finally active.
02:43.23atan=)
02:43.28atanI have it in sccp.conf
02:43.31atanit is connected up
02:44.04atanI have addon = 7914 in the config =\
02:44.12atanThe lights on the 7914 are all solid red though
02:44.34atanThese 7914s are new though. I have never used them. I can't vouch for what firmware is on it... =S
02:45.27p3nguin_Is the phone operating like you expect, besides the 7914?
02:45.59atanSure. You could say that. =)
02:46.25atanServer registers all the commands & everything else there is good.
02:46.38*** join/#asterisk Preytell (~jerry.win@24-171-5-61.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com)
02:50.06atanYou wouldn't have any idea how I might flash the firmware on it using tftp? =\
02:52.09*** join/#asterisk a1fa (~a1fa@unaffiliated/a1fa)
02:52.12p3nguin_Not really.
02:53.29atanI see. Hmm.
02:53.41atanI foresee an eBay auction for these coming up soon.
02:56.34*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
02:58.17*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~Aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
02:58.54p3nguin_haha
02:59.05atanAnd a few Cisco phones.
02:59.07p3nguin_How many of them do you have?
02:59.16p3nguin_What all do you have?  I might be interested.
03:00.01atan2x7914, 1x7960, 1x7940, 1xdual stand (for the 7914's), 2xpower cubes
03:00.15atanOddly though, I really love how the phones are built :|
03:00.26atanThey are really commercial feeling. Hard to break feeling, if you will
03:00.43atanI'll just be damned if I can't get them working to their fullest
03:02.03*** join/#asterisk mintos (~mvaliyav@114.143.167.91)
03:03.04atanErr, actually, I think there will be another power cube thinger on the way here soon as well.
03:03.13atanReally not all that much gear.
03:03.18p3nguin_Are you only considering selling, or do you know for sure that you're wanting to get rid of the stuff?
03:04.15atanI'm not sure what you're asking. I'm just fed up with them =) I have been looking at other more SIP compliant phones for awhile now
03:04.45p3nguin_Are you absolutely ready to get rid of the stuff, or were you only contemplating selling it?
03:05.11atanponders that question for a moment
03:05.56atanYeah. They can go. I just need to order in a replacement. I have my eye on one right now though =)
03:06.20atanTo be fair though, two items have still not arrived. I am still waiting for the x60 to get here (due any day) and one power cube
03:07.09p3nguin_Is that a 7960G or non-G model?
03:07.51atanIt's marked as G
03:08.17atanI am still waiting for it to arrive to be sure though. The supplier was confused about it, not knowing much about them or something.
03:08.25atanI feel his/her pain now :P
03:08.34p3nguin_I tried to buy one from another guy on here... I paid him back in August, and I still haven't seen the phone.
03:08.53atanlol. Ouch.
03:09.31atanWell I have like 500+ some odd positive eBay feedback, and however many verified paypal sales if that eases your mind any :P
03:10.17atanI wouldn't make any deal on the 7060g one until it arrives since I can't comment on it just yet
03:10.26atanThat would be like selling the milk before getting the cow
03:11.35*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~Aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
03:12.41p3nguin_What phone were you testing with?
03:12.55atanRight now I have one of the two 7914s on a 7940
03:13.21atan(and now you're going to tell me the 7940 doesn't support it? please?)
03:13.53atanAll the bloody lights on the thing are red. Only reference to it on Google I could find was to update the firmware & do something funky with CCM
03:13.55p3nguin_As far as I know, it does.  Sorry.  :(
03:14.03*** join/#asterisk pinoyskull (~pinoyskul@112.198.64.90)
03:14.29atanMaybe it's just this 7940 is funky
03:14.57atanPerhaps the 7960 will have a different song to sing ^_^
03:15.35p3nguin_Don't get up your hopes on that one.  The 7940 and 7960 should behave the same.
03:15.46*** join/#asterisk erinspice (~erin@207.98.195.107)
03:24.04*** join/#asterisk AdvoWork (~AdvoWork@unaffiliated/advowork)
03:24.29*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
03:42.00*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
03:46.38*** join/#asterisk atan (~atan@unaffiliated/atan)
03:57.02*** join/#asterisk OrNix (~ornix@l49-131-248.cn.ru)
04:04.47*** join/#asterisk sshock (~sshock@63-248-175-46.static.logl001.digis.net)
04:05.46*** join/#asterisk csnook (~chris@209-6-38-66.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com)
04:09.02sshockCan I query the * DB from CLI?
04:09.47sshockhmm, database show ?
04:09.49WIMPydatabase <tab>
04:10.46sshocksomething weird is going on; * keeps calling me
04:11.33p3nguin_haha
04:11.39sshockIn the CLI I see messages like: WARNING[9750]: chan_sip.c:1950 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission 874372580@10.218.121.72 for seqno
04:12.09sshockit has something to do with Google Voice, which I've been playing with, but I can't figure out why it is doing phantom calls
04:12.38sshockand no, it is not funny; ok, maybe a little bit
04:16.49*** join/#asterisk sshock (~sshock@63.248.133.83)
04:20.58*** part/#asterisk Tech_Travis (~Travis_El@cpe-76-168-191-127.socal.res.rr.com)
04:24.20*** join/#asterisk radic (~radic@178.2.217.34)
04:24.58*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
04:25.27sshockso, any ideas?  is this coming from GV, or is * doing it?
04:27.09p3nguin_Are you wanting me to guess or what?
04:28.13sshockI don't know
04:28.47sshockanyone has played with pygooglevoice and noticed this behavior?
04:36.18*** join/#asterisk csnook (~chris@209-6-38-66.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com)
04:39.17*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
04:42.29*** join/#asterisk v1s (~v1s@202.84.107.67)
04:43.31v1sis there a way to add sip users to a database and and not have to sip reload or is the only way via a conf file?
04:44.56p3nguin_~realtime
04:44.56infobotrealtime is probably a feature of Asterisk starting with 1.2 which allows you to map any configuration file (static mappings) to be pulled from the  database, or to map special runtime entries which permit the dynamic creation of  objects, entities, peers, etc. without the necessity of a reload.
04:47.15v1sp3nguin_:  thanks
05:10.15*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
05:15.23*** join/#asterisk Maliuta_ (~scooby@kiev.lusan.id.au)
05:15.40*** join/#asterisk madduck_ (~madduck@debian/developer/madduck)
05:15.41*** join/#asterisk eharris_ (~eharris@99-179-7-82.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net)
05:16.17*** join/#asterisk Woody4286 (~Woody2143@machine76.Level3.com)
05:16.32*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~Aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
05:16.56*** join/#asterisk F|ReSTaRT (~dlyh@unaffiliated/firestart)
05:18.52*** join/#asterisk cnu (cnu@2001:470:28:1fe::10)
05:21.50*** join/#asterisk Kyosh (whoa@96.246.171.27)
05:24.57*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
05:33.01[TK]D-Fenderv1s: [23:42]<infobot>Fullstop wanted to say - [11:58]<fullstop>if he comes back, it's been asked before: http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg189267.html
05:33.04[TK]D-Fenderv1s: was for you
05:40.32*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
05:47.11v1sok got it thanks.
05:50.54*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.72.215.94)
06:18.39*** join/#asterisk Tim_Toady (~moi@77.49.109.71.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr)
06:24.34*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
06:27.33*** join/#asterisk mintos (~mvaliyav@114.143.164.37)
06:30.49*** join/#asterisk mintos (~mvaliyav@114.143.164.37)
06:33.55*** join/#asterisk _mwoodj_ (~mwoodj@pdpc/sponsor/digium/hyper-eye)
06:35.25*** join/#asterisk jplank (~G_Bove@208-104-67-26.dyn.fttp.comporium.net)
06:35.51jplankcould someone see whats wrong with this: ExecIf($["${LEN(${CALLERID(num)})}" < "5"],Set,CALLERID(num)=7325551234)
06:35.57jplankI must be missing it
06:36.14jplankits setting the caller ID even when the caller id len is greater then 5
06:37.27*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
06:39.03jplankahhh got it, comma instead of a pipe
06:40.45phixyeah
06:40.48phixgets me everytime
06:46.18jplankgrrr I'm wrong
06:46.25phixyay
06:46.51jplankdoes that first part look right?
06:47.19jplank$["${LEN(${CALLERID(num)})}" < "5"] that always comes out as true no matter what the caller id num is
06:48.01jplankthere has to be something obvious I'm missing
06:48.13phixmaybe
06:48.16phixtime for python
06:48.18phixbrb
06:50.20jplankgot it, none of it should of been inside quotes
06:50.29*** join/#asterisk shamelessn00b (~chatzilla@58-65-172-114.nayatel.pk)
06:51.55*** join/#asterisk AndyRomano (~Adium@195.34.154.20)
06:56.01*** join/#asterisk schmidts (~schmidts@lmlo.sil.at)
06:56.04schmidtsgood morning
06:56.05*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.72.215.94)
07:01.10AndyRomanogooood morning ;)
07:07.10*** join/#asterisk Burnz1984 (~Burnz1984@212.80.243.19)
07:08.23Burnz1984i can set a char bfore the number with set(calleridnum)=abc${calleridnum}) but how i can set a char behind the number?
07:20.56*** join/#asterisk _Raptor_ (raptorblue@andariel.informatik.uni-erlangen.de)
07:22.09*** join/#asterisk theron (~theron@ip244.scolloc.lh.net)
07:23.11*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.72.215.94)
07:24.53*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
07:33.36*** part/#asterisk sshock (~sshock@63.248.133.83)
07:34.27shamelessn00bgood morning
07:34.29shamelessn00b:)
07:36.26kaldemarBurnz1984: your example has numerous errors in it... but, Set(CALLERID(num)=${CALLERID(num)}abc)
07:39.22*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
07:39.59Burnz1984@<kaldemar> it doen´t work :/
07:40.54Burnz1984i use asterisk 1.4 on debian
07:42.29kaldemarshow a CLI output where it doesn't work. and which version? 1.4 is a branch, not a version.
07:42.39*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
07:43.47*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
07:48.24Burnz1984cli output: "CALLERID(num)=sasabc" in new stack ; "sas" is the shorthand symbol for a internal number
07:48.41Burnz1984cli output: "CALLERID(num)=sasabc" in new stack ; "sas" is the shorthand symbol for a internal number
07:48.45*** join/#asterisk mpe (~mpe@0xd99d3f8f.customer.cybercity.dk)
07:50.33kaldemarhow did that not work?
07:51.42Burnz1984there is no sasabc at the telephone lcd, there is only the sharthand symbol "sas" at the lcd
07:51.59*** join/#asterisk atan (~atan@unaffiliated/atan)
07:53.37kaldemarwhat is the telephone showing? and, it is bad practice to insert characters in the number part of caller id. maybe you want to change the name part, CALLERID(name).
07:55.46Burnz1984i make a change because of forwarding...someone call person a, an this person is not available, than there is a forwarding to person b. an that person b see it´s a forwarding the shall be a char after the number like: 0123456789F; "F" shall show that it is a forwarding call
07:57.28Burnz1984i have set the char before the number...thats no problem
07:57.45kaldemarwhat is the telephone supposed to show on the screen? the caller id name or the number?
07:58.19Burnz1984the name, but whenn i make the same with callerid(all) it doesn´t work to
07:58.40kaldemartry CALLERID(name) then.
07:58.48Burnz1984yes with callerid(name it works ^^
07:58.58Burnz1984thanks very much
07:59.06kaldemarCALLERID(all) wants a different syntax.
07:59.25*** join/#asterisk erinspice (~erin@207.98.195.107)
08:00.00Burnz1984ok thanks
08:00.02*** join/#asterisk Trixboxer (~Trixboxer@office.supportdepartment.net)
08:03.14Burnz1984but what is when i want to make this for internal call that works with shorthand symbols and for external calls that works with numbers?
08:03.23*** join/#asterisk mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1)
08:03.50Burnz1984than i have to amake twiwce a set? one for callerid(num) and one for callerid(name)?
08:03.56kaldemari don't undestand what you want.
08:04.49Burnz1984when a call comes from outside, have this call a callerid(name) or a callerid(num)?
08:07.04kaldemardepends on many things. use an extension that shows both in CLI to find out your case.
08:07.23Burnz1984k
08:08.17*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@buero-gw.dortmund.loca.net)
08:09.42kaldemaranyway, number is usually the part that is always set. nothing prevents you from setting CALLERID(name)=${CALLERID(num)}abc for example, if you want.
08:10.24kaldemarthe usual case is that the number is all you get in an inbound call from a service provider.
08:13.18*** join/#asterisk visik7 (~Adium@unaffiliated/visik7)
08:13.46*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@178.177.220.178)
08:14.01*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@178.177.220.178)
08:16.15*** join/#asterisk stix (~stix@firewall.o4.dk)
08:17.04*** part/#asterisk jplank (~G_Bove@208-104-67-26.dyn.fttp.comporium.net)
08:17.26stixMorning guys. Every time my asterisk has an issue it tries to restart itself. This is fine except after the restart it is suddenly running as user root. This results in a lot of scripts not working etc. How can I resolve this?
08:18.00*** join/#asterisk asterisk-learner (~chatzilla@77.42.241.114)
08:21.34*** join/#asterisk AlHafoudh (~alhafoudh@195.46.69.4)
08:21.34AlHafoudhhi all
08:21.52AlHafoudhare there some commands that can check status o ooh323 in asterisk?
08:22.43*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@178.177.220.178)
08:22.46*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@178.177.220.178)
08:24.53*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
08:27.11*** join/#asterisk Faustov (~fst@gentoo/user/faustov)
08:27.41Burnz1984one question more...we have a 8 port isdn panel in our astreisk server...6 ports a used by a provider named "versatel" now we have the chance to get a flat rate for 2 of this ports. is it possible to set a priority for this 2 ports that the calls goes a first out over this 2 ports when they free?
08:28.19kaldemarBurnz1984: yes. you do that in your dialplan.
08:33.11*** join/#asterisk SeTTleR (~bernd@p5DDED35D.dip.t-dialin.net)
08:34.54*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
08:35.42*** join/#asterisk aberrios_ (~aberrios@195.171.4.82)
08:39.06aberrios_lo
08:45.42ChannelZhigh
08:57.40*** join/#asterisk af_ (~getsmart@78.134.21.206)
08:58.19*** join/#asterisk w0rk3r (~Senny@85.15.80.251)
08:58.36*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@80.93.247.26)
09:05.32*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
09:13.31*** part/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@80.93.247.26)
09:13.37*** join/#asterisk Intel`` (~clarencec@94.200.7.26)
09:14.19Intel``question guys. i would like to know how can i change the filename of the incoming monitoring
09:14.34*** join/#asterisk razu (~razu@razu.data.ee)
09:15.52AlHafoudhwhy i dont have correct CALLERID information in dialplanm script when call is coming form SIP trunk? the info is in SIP header but not in CALLERID variable, i get ""
09:17.04*** join/#asterisk gregd (~gregd@188-220-38-34.zone11.bethere.co.uk)
09:17.46v1sAlHafoudh: how areu calling it?
09:21.14*** join/#asterisk tengulre (~tengulre@125.71.208.16)
09:22.12*** join/#asterisk ickmund (~ickmund@cli-5b7e85e4.bcn.adamo.es)
09:24.08kaldemarAlHafoudh: variable or function?
09:24.27*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
09:24.48*** join/#asterisk aberrios_ (~aberrios@195.171.4.82)
09:27.53kaldemarAlHafoudh: CALLERID variable was deprecated in 1.4 branch, use the function instead.
09:28.54*** join/#asterisk hrhrhr (~c1@unaffiliated/hrhrhr)
09:29.47*** join/#asterisk krion (~seb@unaffiliated/krion)
09:36.05*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
09:36.57Burnz1984kaldemar, you have said i can handle ports with prority? have you some example howto?
09:37.24kaldemarBurnz1984: for example, make an extension that dials the 2 ports first, then checks DIALSTATUS variable that is set by app Dial, and proceeds by the value.
09:38.21kaldemarif the call goes through, ${DIALSTATUS} should equal to "ANSWER". otherwise, you can dial using the rest of the ports (aka spans).
09:39.57*** join/#asterisk ruyo (~psantos@a83-132-152-91.cpe.netcabo.pt)
09:42.05*** join/#asterisk visik7 (~Adium@unaffiliated/visik7)
09:42.45*** join/#asterisk visik7 (~Adium@unaffiliated/visik7)
09:43.23*** join/#asterisk visik7 (~Adium@unaffiliated/visik7)
09:44.27*** join/#asterisk teichsta_ (5eddde1a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.94.221.222.26)
09:50.54teichsta_hi
09:51.02teichsta_which language is spoken here?
09:51.02*** join/#asterisk CoderForLife (~Miranda@cpe-174-103-152-61.cinci.res.rr.com)
09:53.11*** join/#asterisk metiu (~chatzilla@85-18-228-185.ip.fastwebnet.it)
09:53.58metiuhi all, just a quick question: do I have to manage concurrency in the dialplan? I mean, should I worry about two calls entering the same critical section in parallel?
09:54.15kaldemarteichsta_: english
09:55.10kaldemarmetiu: depends on what the dialplan does.
09:56.41teichsta_:kaldemar thanks
09:56.52metiuI mean, if I have e.g. a group(foo) in more than one extension, and I test group_count(foo) before, should I worry about this critical section and use LOCK() UNLOCK()
09:58.50teichsta_i have problems to get chan_misdn selectable in make menuselect (asterisk 1.8 sourcebuild) - my OS is Ubuntu Server 10.10 / mISDN, mISDNuser is compiled and installed successfully (as far as i can see - misdn_info writes reasonable output)
09:59.02teichsta_but no chance to make chan_misdn selectable
09:59.52teichsta_are some hints you can give me? i issued ./configure after mISDN installation
10:00.19kaldemarmetiu: it's possible that the conditions change in between
10:01.56metiukaldemar: so it's necessary to use a mutex to protect the group_count() check and the group() entry... I suspected it
10:02.16metiubut I couldn't find any mention in the group_count() examples
10:02.40*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.72.215.94)
10:03.35*** join/#asterisk aberrios_ (~aberrios@195.171.4.82)
10:06.33*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
10:15.57Burnz1984who know what the "#" in may zaptel.conf do? like: span=1,1,3...... #bchan=5,6 #dchan=7 bchan=1,2 dchan=3  is the "#" for an alternative span?
10:21.28kaldemarBurnz1984: it is a comment character.
10:23.27Burnz1984like ";"?
10:24.04kaldemaryes. like ; in asterisk configuration files.
10:24.08pifhi, has someone tried the polycom IP 335 with * ?
10:24.56*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
10:27.56*** join/#asterisk guilhermebr (~Guilherme@189.50.119.253)
10:28.05tzafrir_laptopBurnz1984, but '#' on asterisk configs means something else (basically: a "preprocessor" directive)
10:28.50*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
10:28.57*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
10:29.16*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
10:31.54*** join/#asterisk bsaxon (~bsaxon@12.107.149.61)
10:37.02*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
10:38.30*** join/#asterisk guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98)
10:49.00*** join/#asterisk adnc (~numer@unaffiliated/adnc)
10:52.20*** join/#asterisk chasing`Sol (~rc4@62.114.143.82)
11:07.46*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
11:21.17*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
11:21.23*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
11:21.57*** join/#asterisk E-bola (~bola@188.120.76.228)
11:38.02*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
11:42.39*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~Aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
11:47.10*** join/#asterisk hrhrhr (~c1@unaffiliated/hrhrhr)
12:08.31*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
12:19.25*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
12:19.27*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
12:21.01stixMorning guys. Every time my asterisk has an issue it tries to restart itself. This is fine except after the restart it is suddenly running as user root. This results in a lot of scripts not working etc. How can I resolve this?
12:22.04fauxalliancehttp://www.mdinescu.com/making_asterisk_run_as_its_own_user.php @ stix
12:22.23fauxallianceOne of the side effects of this kind of setup is that asterisk won't be able to set ToS bits for VoIP packets anymore. That's because setting the ToS requires elevated privileges.
12:22.35fauxallianceamongst other 'features'
12:24.01stixwell I don't know what ToS bits are, so don't know if it's a problem :)
12:24.59*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
12:25.09stixfauxalliance, but asterisk is already running as user asterisk: "asterisk  6406  1.2  1.2 597584 52436 pts/0    Sl   12:49   0:26 /usr/sbin/asterisk -f -U asterisk -G asterisk -vvvg -c"
12:25.26stixit's only when it dies and restarts itself, then it runs as root automatically
12:25.48*** join/#asterisk thansen (~thansen@c-98-202-28-239.hsd1.ut.comcast.net)
12:28.43*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
12:36.09E-bolaIs there anyway to specify a Set(CHANNEL(musicclass)=Polyteknisk) for a whole context? Its a bit of a pain to have to specify it for every extension...
12:37.01russellbstart all extensions at priority 2, and have exten => _X.,1,Set(...)
12:37.47*** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/atheme.member.chainsaw)
12:38.30E-bolaahhh interesting hadnt thought of that
12:38.43*** join/#asterisk krion (~seb@unaffiliated/krion)
12:39.26E-bolahmm requires me to re-arrange my context a bit, but i guess it does whaqt i need. Thanks russellb
12:39.35russellbyeah, it's kind of a hack ...
12:39.38russellbyou're welcome
12:40.25russellbor you could use 2 contexts, one with the catchall that sets that, and then do a Goto() to the other
12:40.35russellbthen you don't have to mess with the extensions at all
12:46.02*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
12:46.33*** join/#asterisk rajmohan (~rajmohan@122.164.113.66)
12:47.07rajmohanhi
12:47.43*** join/#asterisk fenrus (fenrus@drickheroin.se)
12:49.00*** join/#asterisk adnc (~numer@unaffiliated/adnc)
12:49.05Khratosgood morning rajmohan
12:49.34rajmohangood morning khratos
12:50.10rajmohancan you give me nice tutorial / reference to build asterisk as a voip gateway
12:51.32Khratosof course
12:51.39Khratosstart reading this: http://asteriskdocs.org/
12:55.26E-bolaCan anybody explain the conclusion of https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18188
12:55.53E-bolapabelanger says its been removed recently, but what does that mean? Is it removed in an svn version, or is it removed in 1.8 final
12:56.12russellbthe NOTICE was a bug that had already been fixed
12:56.31E-bolaSo should I be seeing it in 1.8 final?
12:56.47E-bolaahh doh
12:56.54E-bolajust ntoiced it says fixed in 1.8.1 at the bottom
13:04.38gregdguys, in freepbx, i'd like to design a custom feature code that simply do SendDTMF(16,250)  down the line. Is it so complicated?
13:05.55fauxalliancegregd, perhaps you should try the proper channel (#freepbx) and wait a little longer for a reply... it's still early.
13:06.04gregd;)
13:06.13fauxalliancehowever, that does sound trivial.
13:09.24*** join/#asterisk slidesinger (~slidesing@c-68-44-99-163.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
13:09.27*** join/#asterisk csnook (~chris@209.6.38.66)
13:16.31*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
13:20.26*** join/#asterisk Fruchthoernschen (~Fruchthoe@77.11.166.106)
13:22.20*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216.191.106.163)
13:24.23*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
13:30.54*** join/#asterisk netrat (~netrat@2001:470:8:479::3)
13:37.28*** join/#asterisk chazzam (~chazz@173-24-239-247.client.mchsi.com)
13:38.09McBoingboAre the cool kids still using Sipp to stress test Asterisk?
13:41.30fauxalliancesipvicious?
13:45.22*** join/#asterisk rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161)
13:46.50*** join/#asterisk titter (~Justin@c-98-208-152-139.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
13:48.02pabelangerMcBoingbo: Sortly yes
13:50.50*** join/#asterisk rajmohan (~rajmohan@122.164.113.66)
13:55.47*** join/#asterisk silkcut (silkut@plox.tor.hu)
13:57.57*** part/#asterisk netrat (~netrat@2001:470:8:479::3)
14:01.42*** join/#asterisk ariel_ (~chatzilla@63.214.236.169)
14:03.45*** join/#asterisk JonnyD_work (~Jon@64.135.100.82)
14:12.55*** join/#asterisk Tim_Toady (~moi@77.49.109.71.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr)
14:18.54*** join/#asterisk puzzled (~foobar@puzzled.xs4all.nl)
14:23.34*** join/#asterisk espiceland (~erin@nat/digium/x-xuiwsrzdviltvvss)
14:24.49*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
14:30.13*** join/#asterisk Patrick^ (~patrick_@2001:470:b0ea:1:219:21ff:fe4e:f5de)
14:34.44*** join/#asterisk rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161)
14:38.55*** join/#asterisk putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson)
14:38.55*** mode/#asterisk [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ
14:48.02*** join/#asterisk tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226)
14:49.06*** join/#asterisk hrhrhr (~c1@unaffiliated/hrhrhr)
14:49.53*** join/#asterisk ccesario (~ccesario@187.75.139.188)
14:55.51tzafrir_laptopMcBoingbo, cool kids will give your server a stress test for free
14:56.00tzafrir_laptopJust put it on the internet
14:56.44*** join/#asterisk n3hxs (~HAMming@63.68.135.4)
14:57.53*** join/#asterisk rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161)
15:03.50*** join/#asterisk _Corey_ (~chatzilla@64.121.4.75)
15:04.53*** part/#asterisk AndyRomano (~Adium@195.34.154.20)
15:11.13*** join/#asterisk iratik (~Adium@74-84-99-12.client.mchsi.com)
15:12.16kjsyo
15:13.06iratikThere is this framework out there called "Vicidial"..   We were getting spikes in system load about once every two days…  Found a slow query log and watched it run a 4 page sql query that took 18 seconds and brought down the box.  Just saying ….
15:15.03*** join/#asterisk myster (~myster@207.148.172.210)
15:15.29*** join/#asterisk binbash_ (~peter@ip4da5c213.direct-adsl.nl)
15:16.24*** join/#asterisk ManxPower (~manxpower@user-24-214-153-32.knology.net)
15:17.43*** join/#asterisk FiReSTaRT (~dlyh@unaffiliated/firestart)
15:18.41*** join/#asterisk adnc (~numer@unaffiliated/adnc)
15:24.07*** join/#asterisk mintos (~mvaliyav@114.143.164.37)
15:25.01*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
15:28.14*** join/#asterisk UQlev (~yuriy@212.50.99.8)
15:33.02*** join/#asterisk underdog (~whyareyou@abel.33ad.org)
15:33.20*** part/#asterisk UQlev (~yuriy@212.50.99.8)
15:36.12*** join/#asterisk plundra (404@article.se)
15:37.05*** join/#asterisk Preytell (~jerry.win@68-188-27-90.static.stls.mo.charter.com)
15:41.26*** join/#asterisk nny (~Scott@174.107.201.103)
15:42.05nnyhow does asterisk handle a queue in rmmemory if everyone is full? Is it suppose to jump to the next part of the dialplan or put the caller on hold until the queue times out?
15:44.50McBoingboAsterisk add-ons with 1.8 have become menuselect correct? I want to add cdr mysql support to Asterisk 1.8
15:45.24*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~Aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
15:45.36*** join/#asterisk drudge` (drudge@unaffiliated/drudge/x-837452)
15:45.48nnyI was/am pretty sure asterisk doesn't do anything with a caller ina  queue until the timeout is reached, and then jumps in context. Is this correct?
15:46.13nny(even if the queue's members are all in use or unavailable based on configuration
15:46.50*** join/#asterisk Tech_Travis (~Travis_El@cpe-76-168-191-127.socal.res.rr.com)
15:54.56*** join/#asterisk The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel)
15:56.24*** join/#asterisk adyn (~adyn@pdpc/supporter/active/adyn)
16:02.41ManxPowerI'm having a problem with MoH.  It seems to play the file only once, then you get silence
16:03.20*** join/#asterisk gregd (~gregd@188-220-38-34.zone11.bethere.co.uk)
16:05.19gregdis it possible to send a dtmf down a specific channel from a CLI?
16:12.02*** join/#asterisk mpe (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk)
16:14.30*** join/#asterisk khronos (~tom@38.126.196.5)
16:14.36khronosHi guys.
16:14.49khronosI have a system running asterisk 1.4.36.
16:15.01khronosWhat are the requireents for app_voicemailmain?
16:15.13Qwellnothing
16:15.18khronosIn teh menuselect I have a selection for app_voicemail but not voicemailmain.
16:15.51Qwellvoicemailmain is an app inside of app_voicemail
16:15.52khronosHas this application been removed and replaced by another in this version?
16:16.52*** join/#asterisk VonGodric (~albeva@109.231.205.3)
16:18.53yonahwwhat is module embedding in 1.8 menuselect? anywhere online with more info about the implications?
16:18.53_Corey_gregd: You could probably use SendDTMF on the channel via Asterisk Manager
16:18.59khronosOk, if I add the module in to the system do I need to shutdown the asterisk process and start it up again?
16:19.10khronosor can I just do a reload?
16:19.15russellbyonahw: you don't need it.  It compiles modules into the main asterisk binary.
16:19.27russellbit was primarily done for platforms that don't support dynamic loading of modules
16:19.34yonahwrussellb: thanks
16:25.46*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
16:26.18*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.223.57.76)
16:29.49*** join/#asterisk rgsteele (~rgsteele@apo.aweber.com)
16:30.58*** join/#asterisk anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm)
16:37.39ruyoIs there a feature in Asterisk to return a transfered call to the person who transfered in case it's busy or times out?
16:38.27p3nguin_In the case of a blind transfer?
16:38.28mmlj4it's *possible* to do
16:39.28ruyop3nguin_, either blind or attended.
16:39.53ruyommlj4, I mean a "easy" way, without much dialplan programming. :>
16:40.00mmlj4in that case, no
16:40.31ruyoOk. I'd better get to work then.
16:43.31mmlj4a few lines of AGI ought to do it
16:44.56mmlj4it's a simple matter of capturing the extension of the phone making the transfer, ringing the target phone for 20 seconds, then transferring back to the first phone
16:45.36mmlj4and maybe not even AGI...
16:46.23*** join/#asterisk bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net)
16:50.12ruyoThere's a variable, BLINDTRANSFER, maybe that's the easiest way. It's limited to blind transfer, though.
16:50.36[TK]D-FenderYou don't need to transfer anything back on an ATTENDED TRANSFER
16:50.46[TK]D-FenderYou never let him go
16:52.48ruyo[TK]D-Fender, depends. Sometimes clients want attended transfer capability but still be able to make a semi-blindtransfer.
16:53.09ruyoBut you're right, it should be enough.
16:53.54ruyoEven if they need to use diferent keys to make the diferent types of transfer.
16:58.42ruyoIs there a reason for Asterisk not to send a CANCEL to an INVITE when the call was answered on another phone?
16:59.59*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@p5498ADF6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
17:01.02*** join/#asterisk jaskew (~jdaskew@netblock-75-79-182-110.dslextreme.com)
17:03.23*** join/#asterisk Preytell (~jerry.win@68-188-27-90.static.stls.mo.charter.com)
17:20.30timahvo1reloads dahdi modules
17:24.08*** join/#asterisk aberrios_ (~aberrios@195.171.4.82)
17:25.13*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
17:28.06ShaunRanybody seen issues with the polycom phones and the newer bootrom/app where it downloads the 000000....cfg file but doesnt listen to the config_files="" params?
17:28.31*** part/#asterisk dandre (~daniel@ble59-2-81-56-122-47.fbx.proxad.net)
17:28.33ShaunR3.3.1
17:29.18*** join/#asterisk dandre (~daniel@ble59-2-81-56-122-47.fbx.proxad.net)
17:30.11*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@80.93.247.26)
17:31.10yonahwShaunR: I had that problem with 3.1.6 the other day
17:31.21*** join/#asterisk Faithful (~Faithful@202.189.73.144)
17:31.44ShaunRWhat was the solution?
17:32.06ShaunRi've reset all the configs, formated the fs, and even reset device settings... nothing
17:32.08yonahwI eventually managed to get the phone to upload its app log and saw that it was failing to download the other files. I tried using the credentials for one of the other files in a browser and the phone automagically worked on the next reboot. I have no explanation
17:32.39yonahwShaunR: is the phone uploading logs to the server?
17:33.02ShaunRi can see it download the 000000000000.cfg file... it also uploads a MAC-boot.log
17:33.41ShaunR1110173118|copy |3|00|Download of '000000000000.cfg' succeeded on attempt 1 (addr 1 of 1)
17:33.57*** join/#asterisk ickmund (~ickmund@cli-5b7e85e4.bcn.adamo.es)
17:34.07yonahwFor me the app log was the key. I was having the problem with a 601 pressing the four arrow keys simultaneously for a few seconds got it to upload the app log. Check the admin guide for your phone if that doesn't help.
17:34.55ShaunRi have no app log
17:37.43yonahwShaunR: the phone has an app log its just not uploading it. There is a way to force a manual upload of the logs including the app log. On the 601 the mechanism is to press the 4 arrow keys simultaneously for a few seconds. Try doing that with your problematic phone. If that doesn't work check the admin guide for your model to find out how to force a manual upload of the logs.
17:37.55*** part/#asterisk guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98)
17:39.58*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~tim@c72co-edge-router.fuzecore.com)
17:41.13ShaunRdoing that makes the phone make a noise like it does when issueing a reboot, but server logs show no attempt to upload...
17:41.21ShaunRmust be some issue with the connection.
17:41.37ShaunRi seam to recall polycom having a sftp problem... wonder if that still exists.
17:42.01yonahwShaunR: maybe its the wrong key combination for your phone.
17:42.58yonahwI don't know anything about sftp issues, can't help you there
17:42.58*** join/#asterisk paulc (~paulc@unaffiliated/paulc)
17:43.25ManxPowerI didn't know Polycoms supported SFTP
17:43.37ShaunRthere we goo....
17:43.43ShaunRManxPower: it's a option..
17:43.57ShaunRit actually listened and uploaded a app.log now.
17:44.16ShaunRfricken A, that sftp problem existed like 3 years ago... you think they could have fixed it.
17:46.07*** join/#asterisk citywok (~kvirc@67-134-194-33.dia.static.qwest.net)
17:47.43ShaunRyay, it downloaded my config.
17:49.43*** join/#asterisk ickmund (~ickmund@cli-5b7ee407.bcn.adamo.es)
17:50.24*** join/#asterisk nrc (~nrc@ip-38-95.sn1.eutelia.it)
17:51.12*** join/#asterisk SaiSoma (~chatzilla@client105.jdcc.edu)
17:52.00yonahwShaunR: what was the problem?
17:52.18*** join/#asterisk Mango (~iMango@S01060016b6853255.vc.shawcable.net)
17:52.28Mango__~itsplist-ca
17:52.28infobotHere are some popular ITSPs (Canada) starting with the more respected ones : http://www.unlimitel.ca , http://www.les.net , http://www.babytel.ca , http://www.voip.ms
17:53.12v1s~itsplist-ph
17:53.47citywoksorry, no philippines list. just ca & us
17:53.47v1s~itsplist-us
17:53.47infobotHere are some popular ITSPs (USA) starting with the more respected ones: http://www.teliax.com , http://www.voicepulse.com/connect/ , http://www.broadvoice.com , http://www.jnctn.com , http://www.bandwidth.com , http://vitelity.net , http://voip.ms and http://flowroute.com
17:54.07v1sis that did providers?
17:54.25citywoki'm pretty sure they all provide DIDs, yes
17:56.37v1sI have for ph if u want to add
17:57.07citywokI'm not sure who manages the bot.  one of the opers will know :)
17:57.08citywok~infobot
17:57.09infobotmethinks infobot is in need of training, can someone train me?
17:59.55*** part/#asterisk VonGodric (~albeva@109.231.205.3)
18:04.19ChannelZinfobot poop is only on the newspaper or outside
18:04.19infobotACTION poops on is only on the newspaper or outside
18:04.39*** join/#asterisk ruben23 (~RLACUMBA@121.97.111.142)
18:04.56theharHas anyone ever had a Polycom IP4000's display stop showing up and all 3 lights on the top flash continously
18:10.21hehol@thehar: yes, I've seen this on a IP4000 with a broken power supply
18:10.33theharoh really?
18:10.46theharjust the broken power interface module
18:10.47theharsweet
18:12.11*** part/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@80.93.247.26)
18:16.31ShaunRyonahw: polycom has some type of bug with SFTP config fetching.
18:16.51ShaunRi found it years ago... but figured that with all the versions that have been pushed out over the years that they would have fixed it.
18:17.14*** join/#asterisk marl_scot (~matt.lowe@office.unk.com)
18:19.02*** join/#asterisk JonnyD_work (~Jon@64.135.100.82)
18:20.10*** join/#asterisk ruyo (~psantos@a83-132-152-91.cpe.netcabo.pt)
18:24.24mlsmith9999afternoo, still working on my problem, in the mean time, I'm looking for work around. My Idea is simple, everytime one of my employee's encounters the congestion problem, they dial and extension, which sole purpose is to issue the reload command. has anybody done this yet?
18:24.42*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
18:26.07*** join/#asterisk atan2 (~atan@unaffiliated/atan)
18:26.23marl_scotany nice folks on here, who could help with an mISDN problem? I have a beronet 4port BRI card, have install mISDN as per (http://www.misdn.org/index.php/Howto_for_Debian) but i cant see the card listed under dmesg , anyone got ay pointers on what im missing?
18:27.27marl_scotah, hold opn might have it :)
18:29.16marl_scotok, got the modules install, but the error im getting from misdn_info says that the address family is not supported, how do i find out the address family to use?
18:30.15marl_scoti did an itial configure of mISDN with --with-AF_ISDN=34
18:30.24*** join/#asterisk wcselby (~wcselby@pdpc/supporter/professional/wcselby)
18:30.26wcselbyo/
18:31.20ManxPowermlsmith9999, ExecIf($["${DIALSTATUS} = "CONGESTION"],System,/usr/bin/asterisk -rx "reload")
18:31.49mlsmith9999ManxPower: nice...
18:32.15ManxPowermlsmith9999, but you are still going to have issues receiving calls
18:32.28mlsmith9999receiving works like a champ...
18:32.31ManxPowerYou will of course need the correct number of quotes on DIALSTATUS
18:33.01mlsmith9999gotcha.
18:33.03citywokare you in need of a reload, or a restart when they hit congestion?
18:33.14mlsmith9999reload fixes it.
18:34.17mlsmith9999I'm fighting with my ITSP at the moment. about it. Once I get free sec, I'll research alternatives that can port my number.. in the meantime just trying to find a bandaid.
18:35.04ManxPowercitywok, his ISP sucks, that is why
18:35.30citywokreally, he needs a reload? or just a sip reload which forces a new register?
18:35.53came0ok im reading the astbook.asteriskdocs.org book and its quite good but im at the point of setting up my ftp and dhcp daemons and im looking at the example dhcpd.conf but i dont see where it specifies the location of the ftp server.  does the phone automatically try to ftp to the same ip as the dhcp server?
18:35.55ManxPowercitywok, I suspect a sip reload would do it, but he did not ask for that
18:36.12ManxPowercame0, yes
18:36.14citywokGotcha, I was mostly wondering if I had missed something
18:36.42Khratoscame0: There should be a setting in the dhcp server that informs the phone about who's going to be the ftp server
18:36.56mlsmith9999Indeed.. maybe just a sip reload.. need to try that out still. I told it in the SIP.conf to reregister every 30sec's even... but that didn't fix it either, so it's something else. and yes it was confrimed that I need to register before auth.
18:37.25mlsmith9999Khratos: there is.. option 66 I think if I remeber right.
18:37.26citywokmlsmith9999: have you looked at a sip debug or a tcpdump to see the conversation?
18:38.01mlsmith9999citywok: yes when it happens the ITSP's server throws back a 403 Forbidden.
18:38.24citywokhow long before was the previous chatter?
18:38.58came0Khratos: ok but by default the phone will look to the same ip address as the dhcp server?
18:39.22mlsmith9999ManxPower: So could I put that statement in one of the configfiles so that when it acutally try's the trunk it executes the reload and then retry's?
18:39.34KhratosThat would depends on the phone, but my experience with Polycom is: 'no'
18:40.25mlsmith9999came0: that's where the DHCP option 66 come into play, it tells it the tftp server address. IF I'm right.
18:40.51came0well im using ftp not tftp if that makes a difference
18:40.56KhratosPeople, Is there a way to set ODBC_STORAGE available without running make menuselect ?
18:41.22mlsmith9999citywok: previous chatter? as in phone call? Anywhere from 15min's to an hour. Mostly and Hour as far as I can tell.
18:42.15citywokno, as in previous sip messages between your * and the itsp
18:43.29mlsmith9999citywok: ah.. good question.. I have to look at that and get back to you. I'm having to leave now and was hoping to put this bandaid in place befor I do.
18:43.51marl_scotok, anyone know how to sort out 'Cannot open mISDN due to Protocol not supported. (Does your Kernel support socket based mISDN?)
18:43.51marl_scot' when using kernel 2.6.26 and mISDN V2 ?
18:44.26wcselbycame0 - what type of phones are you deploying?
18:45.26ManxPowermlsmith9999, you put it in the dialplan after your Dial line
18:47.44atan2When a SIP phone makes a call outbound it can hang up, but the phone receiving the call keeps ringing. I assume I missed something somewhere. Hmm. Any ideas?
18:48.06ManxPoweratan2, if the far end answers does the call work?
18:48.15atan2Yes, the call does function
18:48.23ManxPowertwo-way audio?
18:48.50atan2Yes, there is two-way audio
18:49.01atan2I just wanted to try it to be sure, but yup, it works
18:49.36atan2Err, sorry, let me clarify.
18:50.02atan2If the receiving phone hangs up the calling SIP phone takes awhile to register that the person hung up on them
18:50.10atan2Perhaps there is some setting for that somewhere?
18:50.19ManxPoweratan2, all SIP, no PSTN?
18:51.35atan2Current setup <sip phone cisco 7940>---<nat router>---<asterisk server>---<voip.ms>---<pstn?>---<who knows what's in here>---<GSM cell phone>
18:52.13citywokatan we only care about the route from your phone to the itsp, we assume the itsp is working properly.
18:52.14ManxPoweratan2, then what you are seeing is expected.  It takes a few moments for the far end carrier to send "phone hung up" message
18:52.47citywokif it's a second or two that's fine, if you are talkinga bout 20 seconds then you have an issue between asterisk and your phone most likely
18:53.03ManxPoweratan2, pastebin the output of a failed call
18:54.25atan2Would love to. One moment.
18:56.17atan2http://pastie.org/private/gn96muvu35piq9ostbqvq is the SIP phone making an outbound call to the cell phone. The SIP phone hung up after hearing just one ring (by me pressing hang up) but phone continued to ring for another 15 or 16 rings, which is about 5 or 16 seconds I believe
18:56.51atan2Also I noticed something funny about how asterisk is sending my caller ID.
18:57.25citywokyou need to set verbosity to like 10, and sip debug should probably be turned on
18:57.41atan2Randomly the caller is is sent as my true 19055551111 number, but I see it has been sent (according to the cell phone) as 01119025551111 =\ hmm
18:58.07citywokcallerid isn't really supported internationally
18:58.31citywokif dialing intl, just send your 11digit number and hope for the best.
19:00.00atan2citywok, the confusion is that it should only be sending the 19055551111 number. I have no idea who added the 0111 on to it =)
19:00.26citywokoh i read it backwards. my bad
19:03.10atan2UGH!! There are so many lines flying from sip debug I can't copy any of them. Does it output these to a log file somewhere?
19:04.18fenrusyou can add logging to file
19:05.09atan2I see one line that concerns me in the window though, flying around, and that is Sending to 192.168.1.12 : 5060 (no NAT)
19:05.27atan2As far as I know Asterisk should not be able to know the phones are behind a router, or their IP ? It should be showing my public IP?
19:05.36atan2and why it says (no nat) also miffs me
19:06.08*** join/#asterisk adnc (~numer@unaffiliated/adnc)
19:07.03fenrusif you have nat between your asterisk server and your phones the nating router needs to be 'sip aware'
19:07.15fenrusif it's just regular routing you're fine
19:07.27atan2fenrus, it's just your run of the mill linksys router?
19:08.36[TK]D-Fender[14:05]<atan2>I see one line that concerns me in the window though, flying around, and that is Sending to 192.168.1.12 : 5060 (no NAT) <- * believes this call came from a place it can trust the CONTACT from.  This is your peer configs fault
19:08.50*** join/#asterisk cslamar (~cslamar@ampache/staff/cslamar)
19:09.34atan2[TK]D-Fender, any idea how I might rectify this?
19:09.42atan2the 192.* ip thing that is.
19:09.47[TK]D-FenderatanFIX YOUR PEER
19:09.52cslamarhas anyone had problems with app_fax giving a 'transmit: Transmission error" while running?  The strange part is the fax is written to disk but it doesn't seem to exit cleanly?
19:10.31atan2My peer refers to the [sip] user, or something configured on the phone itself?
19:11.13ManxPoweratan, peer = sip.conf setup for device on 192.168.1.12
19:12.27*** join/#asterisk underdog (~underdog@72.46.208.205)
19:12.28atan2http://pastie.org/private/ufmpgefhwjxvkcwgod2g is what I have in there
19:12.39ManxPowerfenrus, you are wrong.  Most routers with SIP/NAT support screw it up and it must be disabled on the router
19:13.08ManxPoweratan, Callerid does NOT contain quotes
19:13.16ManxPoweratan, pastebin the [general] config as well
19:14.12fauxalliance[TK]D-Fender, Holiday tomorrow?
19:14.17*** join/#asterisk doctah- (~doctah@76.77.120.30)
19:14.29[TK]D-Fenderfauxalliance: Noe, worse-still all-day meeting
19:14.35atan2ManxPower, http://pastie.org/private/ds86v4wxh4n11pjrlz4a
19:14.51fauxalliance[TK]D-Fender, eww... I think it should be a national holiday nonetheless.
19:15.01fauxallianceNovemberance Day...
19:15.11fauxallianceugh, Remembrance Day rather
19:15.38ManxPoweratan, and the output of ifconfig
19:15.48[TK]D-Fenderatan: You aren't looking at at the call.
19:16.57atan2ifconfig: http://pastie.org/private/ar32vy8gkqj4wg9pjpkf2q
19:17.49ManxPowereither you faked your address or you are behind nat
19:17.51ManxPower111.222.333.444
19:18.03atan2I replaced my public ip with 111.222.333.444, sorry
19:18.05p3nguin_<atan2> citywok, the confusion is that it should only be sending the 19055551111 number. I have no idea who added the 0111 on to it =)    <--- No, it should be sending 9055551111 if you are in the US.
19:18.21ManxPoweratan2, you didn't do something stupid like set the phone config on the actual phone for NAT, did you?
19:18.36gregdguys, im trying to senddtmf() down the line, I have an extension that does it, CLI shows the execution, however it does not look like it goes the right channel (it goes back to me instead down to the channel, is it possible at all?
19:18.36*** join/#asterisk darksk1ez (~mhb@2001:470:9272:1::1)
19:18.47atan2p3nguin_, I thought I was to provide the '1'. I'll remove it.
19:19.00ManxPowergregd, that is what it does.  what are you trying to accomplish?
19:19.26atan2p3nguin_, thank you. Removing the 1 resolved the caller ID issue
19:19.50atan2But not the whole issue of it continuing to ring the phone I am calling =\
19:19.56gregdManxPower: senddtmf(flash), senddtmf(1234) down the line when I dial feature code
19:20.22atan2ManxPower, yes I think I did.
19:20.30atan2It says NAT: Yes but Nat address: blank
19:21.48p3nguin_atan2: Is Asterisk behind NAT?
19:22.10atan2No? Just the SIP phone.
19:22.23atan2I don't believe it is anyway. It has a public IP address & so on....
19:22.29p3nguin_The asterisk system is connected right to the modem?
19:22.53atan2The Asterisk box is sitting at Rackspace. How it's connected up I'm not 100% sure.
19:23.09ManxPowergregd, features.conf
19:23.09atan2The SIP phone is sitting on my desk, going through a little linksys router thinger.
19:23.29ManxPoweratan2, stop mumbling and tell us your router
19:23.58atan2ManxPower, WRT300N running dd-wrt
19:24.10ManxPoweratan, disable any SIP NAT features.
19:24.20ManxPoweraka SIP ALG
19:24.21atan2I changed the phone setting from NAT=yes to NAT=no and the phone is no longer connecting
19:24.30*** join/#asterisk Preytell (~jerry.win@68-188-27-90.static.stls.mo.charter.com)
19:24.31ManxPoweratan, the phone must be set to no
19:25.17ManxPowerwhen you If you SIP NAT twice (asterisk AND the phone), nat support is DISABLE when the 2nd device tries to fixup the call for bat
19:25.19ManxPowernat.
19:25.32*** join/#asterisk Roconda (~roconda@blackmind.roconda.nl)
19:25.44*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
19:25.48p3nguin_You should set the actual phone's NAT setting to disabled and let Asterisk deal with the NAT.  This is a typical configuration.
19:26.46atan2This is going to sound silly, but how do you disable NAT on a router? It has a NAT / QoS tab but inside it are port forwards, range forwards, port triggers, upnp, dmz & qos
19:27.01ManxPowerp3nguin_, he is using DDWRT so chances are the router is as well
19:27.05p3nguin_You don't disable NAT on the router.
19:27.13ManxPoweratan2, are you doing any port forwarding
19:27.19ManxPoweratan, disable SIP NAT not NORMAL NAT
19:27.28p3nguin_You need NAT on the router to provide internet for the LAN.
19:27.28atan2ManxPower, there are no port forwards
19:27.42ManxPoweratan, is there an ALG or application page?
19:29.09atan2There is a Services tab, with Milkfish SIP Router in it
19:29.12atan2But that's disabled
19:29.49atan2ManxPower, nope I do not see any
19:29.55p3nguin_Did you ever try to milk a fish?
19:30.04atan2...actually
19:31.18atan2I suppose I should forward the ports to the device?
19:32.40ManxPoweratan, only if you want to guarntee it does not work
19:32.52ManxPower~sipnat
19:32.52infobotrumour has it, sipnat is Quick guide on configuring Asterisk + SIP behind NAT : http://www.aocomputing.net/?p=3 , otherwise check the WIKI at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SIP+NAT+solutions
19:32.58ManxPowerwhy don't you go read those docs
19:33.23atan2Thanks =)
19:35.40atan2Can't get to http://www.aocomputing.net/?p=3 =\ the other link work fine though
19:36.09atan2I assume I would be #8? "Asterisk as a SIP server outside nat, clients on the outside connecting to Asterisk "
19:36.29gregdManxPower: I've added the script in features.conf but still it everything is send back to me instead of down the line
19:36.43atan2In the list below it says "#8 is no problem. No NAT in the middle " :P
19:43.27*** join/#asterisk Micc (~quassel@c-24-18-20-54.hsd1.wa.comcast.net)
19:44.10MiccI've set maxexpirey=160 in sip.conf general section, but my peers still are able to register with expire of 3600
19:44.56[TK]D-FenderThis is ridiculous...
19:45.21[TK]D-Fenderatan2: Pastebin the ENTIRE FUCKING CALL with SIP DEBUG enabled along with your sip.conf masking ONLY paswords.
19:46.07[TK]D-Fenderatan2: You last showed 1 line to show where it was responding to, but not WHY because the entire start of the call you didn't feel was relevant to determining WHERE to respond to.  This is wrong.
19:46.13p3nguin_atan2: I think you are #9 on that list.
19:46.36[TK]D-FenderI think....
19:46.38p3nguin_atan2: You have a NAT.  You have: Asterisk as a SIP server outside nat, clients on the inside connecting to Asterisk
19:46.41[TK]D-Fender~wmmfpb
19:46.41infobot[~wmmfpb] WHERE'S MY MOTHER-^%#ING PASTEBIN?!?
19:47.11ManxPowergregd, then you have the ,<ActivateOn>[/<ActivatedBy>] wrong
19:47.34atan2[TK]D-Fender, lol. Sorry. I changed nat=no on the phone and now it won't even connect up. Just getting that sorted out then I'll get that debug out =)
19:48.03ManxPoweratan, define "nat=no" "on the phone".  Do you mean "on the phone" or do you mean "in sip.conf"
19:48.26atan2ManxPower, in sip.conf nat is set to yes. On the phone, inside the menus, it is set to no
19:48.35ManxPoweratan, good
19:51.34atan2I wish this 7940 would start up quickier each time =\ it's as if it loads Windows ME every time I unplug it.
19:54.37gregdManxPower: so how do I design a feature to senddtmf down the line and bridge back?
19:55.16atan2Okay, we're getting somewhere here now. I just asked my provider if my server was behind a nat, and they replied "Michael Q:  Yes, they are behind a bridge using NAT"
19:55.23*** part/#asterisk nrc2 (~nrc@ip-38-95.sn1.eutelia.it)
19:56.20ManxPowergregd, in features.conf
19:56.32ManxPowergregd, are you using a GUI for Asterisk
19:56.39atan2They go on to say "The server is still wide open to the internet, especially once your OS firewall has opened its ports" >_<
19:57.30gregdManxPower: i got his point :) yes I use gui, but it does not matter.. I'm happy to edit the files itself for testing purposes
19:59.17ManxPowergregd, except the GUI will re-edit the files anytime you make a change in the GUI
19:59.27ManxPowergregd, look on the Wiki, it should work.
19:59.55ManxPowergregd, "bridge back"?
20:00.20Preytellanyone seen an issues where outbound calls choose a trunk that is ringing, therefore the outbound call anwsers the incoming line.
20:00.35Preytellthis is DAHDI/Pots btw.
20:00.40ManxPowerPreytell, that is called "glare"
20:00.48gregdManxPower: meaning, if I put the call on hold, I got access to features. So I mean, that after executing the feature I'd like to remove the hold
20:00.54citywokPreytell: i had that happen when i used 24 port analog FXS/FXO cards and both sides opened the same trunk at the EXACT same time
20:01.18ManxPowergregd, don't put the call on hold.  when you do that your features won't apply to the held line
20:01.33Preytellman, I am using an 8 port digium card, and it happens often.
20:01.36ManxPowerPreytell, chage your g1 (or whatever group number you use) to G1
20:02.04ManxPowerif the telco starts at the bottom and moves on up, then you want to start at the top and work your way down.  search for "glare" on the wiki
20:02.28Preytellsorry, but which wiki?
20:02.36ManxPower!answers
20:02.39ManxPower~answers
20:02.39infobot[~answers] Asterisk Book: http://astbook.asteriskdocs.org & SIP w/ NAT: http://www.aocomputing.net/?p=3 & Wiki: http://www.voip-info.org & Docs: /path/to/src/asterisk/doc & 1.4 .vs. 1.6.0 .vs. 1.6.1: /path/to/src/asterisk/UPGRADE*.txt
20:02.45ManxPowertge voip-info.org one
20:02.45Preytellthanks
20:03.48gregdManxPower: but if I dont put it on hold, the asterisk feature is not executed
20:04.37Preytellfun.
20:04.57citywokWho maintains the infobot?
20:05.04gregd*im not able to execute a feature
20:05.10ManxPowergregd, then something ELSE is wrong
20:05.17citywokThe asterisk wiki is now asterisk.wiki.org :P
20:05.28citywokwhoops, dyslexic much? wiki.asterisk.org
20:05.56ManxPowercitywok, but the voip-info.org wiki is the voip-info.org wiki
20:06.21ManxPowerthe only thing wiki.asterisk.org has on it, as far as I know, is ONLY docs for Asterisk 1.7
20:06.27ManxPower..er.. 1.8
20:07.45Qwellit's a wiki.  Add to it.
20:08.08PreytellOk, one other issue, (And I really hate pots lines), at times when a caller attempts to make an outbound call the system will show that all channels are busy and play the congestion tone. But there are zero lines in use and incoming calls still work on the same pots lines that the system will not allow an outbound call. ????
20:08.10*** join/#asterisk funslug (~muiro@unaffiliated/muiro)
20:08.16*** part/#asterisk gregd (~gregd@188-220-38-34.zone11.bethere.co.uk)
20:08.56*** join/#asterisk elguero (~miguel323@12.187.84.162)
20:09.04funslugI have a question about cmd MYSQL from the asterisk-addons package. How can I specify a port in the Connect command?
20:09.06Preytellwhere does asterisk keep track, read that "show", you which lines it thinks are in use. Because the core show channels does not show it.
20:09.49Preytell/proc/dahdi/1 shows zero lines in use...  I don't understand where the decision that a line is in use comes from.
20:11.13ManxPowerPreytell, are you using a GUI for Asterisk?
20:11.22tzafrir_laptopPreytell, a line is in use when a userspace program opens it
20:11.33tzafrir_laptopThat program is normally Asterisk
20:11.56tzafrir_laptopIf it's asterisk it means that this channel is available for Asterisk to use
20:11.57Preytellyeah, and to make matters worse I am using piaf, asterisk 1.8, and freebpx 2.3
20:11.58ManxPowerPreytell, core show channels shows you the channels that are in use.
20:12.08ManxPowerPreytell, why don't you ask on #FreePBX?
20:12.26tzafrir_laptopfreepbx 2.3? Does it work with asterisk 1.8 (manager interface, speicifcally)
20:12.27tzafrir_laptop?
20:12.50Preytellsorry freepbx 2.8
20:12.57ManxPowerPreytell, since you are using FreePBX virtually nothing we tell you will apply.
20:13.31PreytellI guess, but the underlying system, and the dahdi layer should apply to all implementations.
20:13.32ManxPowerPreytell, the decision as to what line to use is set up in the Asterisk dialplan
20:13.44ShaunRanything with the queues change from 1.6.0.13 to 1.6.2.13? calls are put into the queue but asterisk doesnt seam to be doing anything with the call after that
20:13.50ManxPowerPreytell, you are wrong Mostly
20:14.04[TK]D-Fender[15:08]<Preytell>Ok, one other issue, (And I really hate pots lines), at times when a caller attempts to make an outbound call the system will show that all channels are busy and play the congestion tone. But there are zero lines in use and incoming calls still work on the same pots lines that the system will not allow an outbound call. ???? <-- systenm will show?  O RLY?
20:14.10ManxPowerShaunR, if it did it should be listed in the UPGRADE*.txt files that comes with your Asterisk source
20:14.33citywokShaunR: I went from 1.6.0 to 1.6.1 and then 1.6.2 and I don't think i've done anything to my queues
20:14.53ManxPowerPreytell, your problem is not at the DAHDI later, it is at the Asterisk later
20:15.41ManxPowerPreytell, Your problem has been experienced by people with PBXs for 20 or 30 years.  We know what the issue is, we know what the solution is.  (Assuming you correctly described the problem_
20:16.11ManxPowernow, go change your outbound group to hunt from the top down instead of the bottom up.
20:16.35Qwellglare isn't going to be solved the same way on analog...
20:16.42ManxPowerOn regular Asterisk you do that by changing from a lower case "g" to a uppercase "G" in your Dial line.
20:16.57ShaunRwith penalty 10 (Invalid) has taken no calls yet
20:17.03ShaunRhmm, wonder what the invalid part is about
20:17.09ManxPowerIt will not eliminate the issue, but it will happen much less frequently.
20:17.18Preytellno, I understand the glare thing. And I will change the order.
20:17.19[TK]D-FenderShaunR: You are using chan_local for members and the modules loaded in the wrong order
20:17.43[TK]D-FenderShaunR: app_queue tried referring to a channel type that did not exist at the time it loaded
20:18.07[TK]D-FenderShaunR: you need to preload it in modules.conf
20:18.11ShaunRso chan_local needs to load before queue
20:18.21[TK]D-Fenderyes
20:18.24QwellManxPower: how do you figure?  incoming calls on analog lines aren't going to be predictable at all.
20:18.47ShaunRi had load => chan_local.so before the load => app_queue.so
20:18.50QwellYou'd have just as much luck by using a random selection for outgoing.
20:18.53citywokLol, set the other end to go the other direction sequentially.
20:18.59ShaunRi have to preload then?
20:19.03Preytellcorrect, you have no control over which line is dialed if the public has the numbers assoc with the other lines.
20:19.06citywokThat's what I did when i had to deal with stupid analog cards
20:19.16[TK]D-FenderShaunR: Yes.  YES. ***YES***
20:19.29ShaunR[TK]D-Fender: do i need to preload all my chans then?
20:19.29[TK]D-FenderShaunR: Capiche?
20:19.36citywok[TK]D-Fender: don't blow a gasket
20:19.38[TK]D-FenderShaunR: not a bad idea
20:19.55PreytellI agree that POTS sucks, I which everyone would let me use sip trunks, pots for failover.
20:20.21ManxPowerum, no.  They should use PRI
20:20.33Preytelltoo expensive where I live.
20:20.37funslughow can I specify a port to use with cmd MYSQL Connect?
20:20.49Preytellonly a few customers will opt for pri over pots.
20:20.56ManxPowerPreytell, and running telephone calls over the internet is unreliable
20:21.03Preytellnod
20:21.24Preytellbut I have been using flowroute, and not had a problems for over a year...
20:21.31ManxPowerwe run tens of thousands of calls each day over VoIP, but they never touch the internet
20:22.44citywokYes, having SIP termination with your internet carrier directly, riding their network 100%, with their QoS makes things much better.
20:23.27PreytellI wish that AT&T/SBC would offer PRI service for a decent rate to business in IL/MO. It would make things cleaner.
20:23.36ShaunR[TK]D-Fender: thank you, working again...
20:23.44ShaunRfor SIP tcp connections what should i set the expires too?
20:23.57Preytellok, off to move trunks around to avoid glare. :)
20:24.06citywokPreytell: what is a "decent rate"?
20:25.19QwellPreytell: ask about a partial PRI
20:25.27*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
20:31.02*** join/#asterisk tyman (~tyler@99-28-157-10.lightspeed.frsnca.sbcglobal.net)
20:33.31*** join/#asterisk hectaman (~hectaman@82.218.68.216.DED-DSL.fuse.net)
20:39.37*** join/#asterisk fofware (~Fabian@host127.200-82-50.telecom.net.ar)
20:40.51hectamanwhen "dahdi show status" shows me CRC4 errors on a T1 is there a way to get more detail as to when those errors took place?
20:41.18citywokhectaman: not that i know of, but my experience was all with zaptel not dahdi
20:41.30citywokif there's any way to clear counters i'd do that and see if it's still happening
20:42.51hectamanI'm occassionally dropping calls on one of three circuits; the first two are PRI's, the third is an LD T1
20:45.33hectamanI'm less than 20 feet from the smartjack; i thought about maybe changing the line build-out to see if I can reduce the occurance
20:45.35*** join/#asterisk kannan (1004@115.252.89.44)
20:46.47kannanhello, in asterisk 1.4.35 , i want to get a 'hot key' in IVR , like press 9 at any time during this ivr to do something..how to acheive that?
20:47.14WIMPyhectaman: "Smartjack" meaning modem?
20:48.23hectamanthe demarc where the carrier hands us the T1 line
20:49.17atan2Does the MagicJack use SIP? =S
20:49.35atan2Err, so it does.
20:49.47*** join/#asterisk n3hxs (~HAMming@63.68.135.4)
20:49.47Qwellatan: effectively no
20:50.14atan2Qwell, well I was not making any comment on the quality of the lump of plastic. I was just curious =)
20:51.14*** join/#asterisk _zoom_ (~user@41.218.36.192)
20:51.30_zoom_hey fellas, how to get rid of FAS
20:51.31_zoom_?
20:51.41_zoom_is it possible
20:51.43_zoom_?
20:52.01pabelangerkannan: Set it up in your dial plan
20:52.08kannananother question, in an IVR , i have an agi script after WaitExten that sometimes takes upto 10 seconds to execute ; the ivr says please wait , but then there is silence for those 10 seconds, is it possible to set music or something during the time when the agi script is executing ..
20:52.08*** join/#asterisk myster (~myster@207.148.172.210)
20:52.26kannanpabelanger , thru features.conf ? and DYNAMIC_FEATURES?
20:52.51pabelangerkannan: no, exten => 9,1,Dosomething()
20:53.38pabelangerDynamic_features would work too actually
20:54.05[TK]D-FenderNo
20:56.52phixhey Mr [TK]D-Fender
20:56.54kannancan comfort noise be set on the DAHDI channel?
20:57.51[TK]D-Fenderkannan: No such thing
20:58.27p3nguin_Asterisk doesn't support comfort noise, anyway.
20:58.58kannan[TK]D-Fender, thanks , i was wondering if something could possibly done to avoid the log silence, on the DAHDI channel it feels like a dead silent
20:59.03*** join/#asterisk visik7 (~Adium@unaffiliated/visik7)
20:59.10kannanlong silence i meant
21:00.59*** join/#asterisk tyman (~tyler@99-28-157-10.lightspeed.frsnca.sbcglobal.net)
21:01.00kannanalso, in a E-1 crossover to a legacy PBX, any outbound call from the phones connected to the legacy pbx goes to 's' exten in dialplan context only, so i am forced to use a Background to enable dialling out. Setting immediate=no , in chan_dahdi.conf did not change this.. how to get the asterisk dialtone?
21:01.15ManxPowerkannan, you mean something like Ringing or MusicOnHold?
21:01.16*** join/#asterisk [Outcast] (~anonymous@64.202.62.5)
21:01.30kannanManxPower , moh is what i thought
21:01.57ManxPowerMaybe you just have a badly designed dialplan?  Are you sure the AGI is what is taking so long?
21:02.40[TK]D-FenderE1 is not a channel signalling standard
21:02.41kannanManxPower , the agi uses cURL, the server from which the response is given is sometimes slow, some netwrok issue also
21:02.44[TK]D-Fenderget SPECIFIC
21:03.17ManxPowerkannan, sounds like MoH is what you need
21:04.06*** join/#asterisk mpe (~mpe@0xd99d3f8f.customer.cybercity.dk)
21:04.39kannan[TK]D-Fender, Euroisdn, CCS , PRI NET on this dahdi trunk
21:04.39funslugokay, lol, cmd MYSQL does not have the ability to take a port in asterisk-addons-1.6.0 or 1.6.2
21:04.54[TK]D-FenderKatry actually looking at the call
21:04.56funslugthat's a pretty nasty oversight
21:05.02[TK]D-Fenderkannan: try actually looking at the call
21:05.12kannanManxPower , ok thanks i will lokk it , so if i set MOH , then it will provide music automatically if there is silence?
21:05.22Nuggetanything that's a deterrent to using mysql is a feature.  :)
21:05.35citywoklol, realtime odbc?!?
21:05.35ManxPowerkannan, it Plays music on hold.  "silence" is meaningless
21:06.23funslugluckily, easy to fix
21:06.24kannanManxPower , oh so i start and stop the music-on-hold when needed
21:07.01kannan[TK]D-Fender, by pri debug on the span? (i cannot understand the output)
21:08.14*** part/#asterisk _zoom_ (~user@41.218.36.192)
21:09.37*** join/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@64.15.77.94)
21:09.47pabelangeranybody have a polycom 301 kicking around?  tell me the AC adapter stats?   DC 12V  ..... mA?
21:10.52ManxPowerthe 330 and 560 I have are 24VDV 500mA
21:11.31kannan[TK]D-Fender, when the legacy PBX 's phone dials , they have to press 0, to get a dial tone on this span. This works when the PBX is connected to PSTN - dialtone , then after dial the number, it calls out. But with Asterisk as PRI Net , it simply dials the zero alone (in 's' exten), which of course there is no dialplan till i use a Waitexten
21:12.31ManxPowerkannan, PRIs don't provide dialtone
21:13.03WIMPySure, PRIs provide dial tone if you don't dend any digits.
21:13.18ManxPowerNo.  They.  Do.  Not.
21:13.27WIMPyBut overlap dialling and Asterisk can be quite tricky.
21:13.33florzYes. They. Do.
21:13.44ManxPoweryou don't even have a Bchannel up to the telco when you are dialing.
21:14.02ManxPowerHow exactly will the dialtone audio get from the telco to your endpoint?
21:14.03WIMPyYou sure do.
21:14.17ManxPowerI wish you the BEST of luck.
21:14.22WIMPyI the B channel you requested.
21:14.29WIMPyIn
21:14.40ManxPowerWIMPy, you have not requested a dialtone when when you start dialing
21:14.46ManxPowerrequested a B-channel
21:14.56[TK]D-Fenderkannan: Indeed, this is live-overlap... you'll have some tricky dialplan to minimize the waiting
21:15.15WIMPyManxPower: You usually won't but you could.
21:15.41WIMPyAnd kannans PBX seems to do.
21:15.47ManxPowerHow would the PRI detect you "went off hook" when you don't go "off hook" when you are dialing.
21:16.15WIMPyWhich I have to gove in seems rather unusual and I haven't seen before.
21:16.21ManxPowerhe is confused.
21:16.51WIMPyManxPower: By sending a setup without called party number, as every ISDN phone also does.
21:17.05ManxPowerof course by the time he has gotten to the "s" extension you are all done with "PRI" and are in Asterisk./
21:17.21ManxPowerWIMPy, ISDN phones generate local dialtone AFIK
21:17.24yonahwjust installed 1.8, made test call, call works but cli doesn't show any call information. verbosity is set to 10. any clues as to where I'm going wrong here?
21:17.26ManxPowerJust like SIP phones do.
21:17.36ManxPoweryonahw, maybe you did not set up /etc/asterisk/logger.conf?
21:17.39kannan[TK]D-Fender, in fact the same config works fine on another Legacy PBX but not  with this one. And the delay in dialling out is what i want to minimize. Otherwise actually, i used a 3 second dialtone.wav with Background
21:17.52yonahwManxPower: maybe, checking
21:17.57kannanso the users cannot figure out , but it dials out after some 8 seconds
21:18.06ManxPoweryonahw, you, read all the UPGRADE*.txt files, right?
21:18.08WIMPyNo, they don't.
21:18.30yonahwManxPower: thought so, but apparently I missed something important
21:18.37ManxPowerWhat ISDN phones out there support PRI anyway?
21:18.51WIMPyISDN is usually 100% interactive, AKA overlap dialling.
21:18.53p3nguin_That seems very contradictory.
21:18.55WIMPyNone
21:18.59*** join/#asterisk trelane (~trelane@funtoo/staff/trelane)
21:19.22WIMPyBut the number of B channels on the onterface doesn't make much difference to the signalling.
21:19.35ManxPowerBTW, "sending a call with no digits" still send the call to the CO and the CO sends out the dialtone
21:19.46florzManxPower: see Q.931, section 5.1.3
21:19.53ManxPowerYou are still not going "off hook"
21:19.55WIMPyThat's the idea.
21:20.21florzManxPower: whatever you mean by "off hook", PRIs can supply a dialtone
21:21.13kannanwith a Samsung PBX , the E1 crossover is fine, but with another PBX (Matrix PBX), this 's' exten thing happens
21:21.26ManxPowerSounds like a simple form of DISA to me.
21:21.30yonahwManxPower: the upgrade docs don't seem to produce anything in regards to logger.conf other than the removal of LOG_EVENT
21:21.38yonahwruns off to read up on logger.conf
21:21.40ManxPowerkannan, "exten s" means "we received no digits
21:21.56kannanManxPower, yes, thanks, i had understood that
21:22.17ManxPowerkannan, start looking at pri debug and make sure the PBX is sending digits
21:22.22ManxPowerthen you won't have any delay at all
21:22.38florzManxPower: no, the dialed digits are (probably) not transmitted in-band, or in end-to-end signalling
21:23.53WIMPykannan: something like s,1,WaitExten(20) should do.
21:24.07ManxPowerflorz, if they are not transmitted in-band and not are transmitted in the signalling, how are the digits being senr
21:24.11p3nguin_If the PBX is connected to Asterisk via analog lines, I'd expect exten s to be used on every call.
21:25.21kannanWIMPy, ok i got it , to set the timeout low is working OK on the 's' now
21:25.33*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
21:25.58ManxPowerkannan, do you have something like immediate=yes?
21:25.59*** join/#asterisk kriebz (~matthewk@office.cawinet.com)
21:26.12kannani was using background (to provide a false dialtone with a wav file ) and then waitexten , so there was the delay
21:26.33kannanManxPower, no , i set chan_dahdi conf to have immediate=no
21:26.33*** part/#asterisk kriebz (~matthewk@office.cawinet.com)
21:28.23ManxPowerkannan, which timeout did you set too low?
21:28.52pabelangerWish me luck.  First time attempting polycom provisioning via Asterisk (res_phoneprov.so)
21:29.30kannani had not set anything on the timeout like SET(aboule or digit) i came out wrong with the word timeout, I had s,1,Background then, as next priority waitexten(5)
21:30.29kannannow the dialtone.wav plays for 3 seconds, i removed the waitexten, the outbound dialling is better in terms of delay
21:31.12*** join/#asterisk ferdna (~yup@cpe-24-92-114-97.elp.res.rr.com)
21:32.15WIMPyWell, as I said: creating an overlap friendly dial plan is tricky.
21:32.56kannanwhat  i didnt get is hwo come the same thing works with one PBX and not another
21:33.01WIMPyIn fact, I think it's only partially possible.
21:33.26WIMPyBecause they're not the same?
21:34.14kannanWIMPy , ha ha yeah well they have to live with it, as they  have a buy back from Samsung, and the other is provided free by the telecom company based on some billing minimum commitments
21:34.18*** join/#asterisk [canniballllera] (~cannibale@201-2-232-3.fnsce703.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br)
21:35.14florzManxPower: I said "end-to-end signalling"
21:38.28kannanthanks for all the help , be back shortly with another list of issues (i cannot get callerid on incoming FXO line), but i am off to get some sleep today, thanks again , bye
21:40.07citywokhmm, so i found the bad line in  ne_request.c from libneon.  anybody see anything wrong with this line? ne_set_error(sess, "%s: %s", doing, ne_sock_error(sess->socket));
21:40.28citywokif i change it to sess, "%s: error at line 208" and remove the ne_sock_error part, it works just fine
21:49.20*** join/#asterisk ccesario (~ccesario@201-42-150-145.dsl.telesp.net.br)
21:56.33*** join/#asterisk E-bola (~bola@x1-6-00-13-46-83-e5-04.k1098.webspeed.dk)
21:59.35marl_scotis it posible to make asterisk use port 4569 TCP as well as/ instead of 4569 UDP ?
21:59.46atan2Can anyone guess at why if I make three calls, the first two exit correctly when I hang up but #3 continues to ring even if the caller has hung up?
21:59.56marl_scotfor IAX port forwarding
22:00.13p3nguin_IAX2 uses UDP, so what do you care about TCP for?
22:00.22WIMPymarl_scot: no
22:00.57marl_scot:( trying to test an * box behind a firewall that i dont have control over, was wanting to use putty to port forward :(
22:01.32marl_scotin past have have full control of routers, so not hit the problem :(
22:01.56WIMPymarl_scot: You can use openvpn, but the usual warnings about tunneling RTP over TCP apply.
22:02.39marl_scotok, was wanting to avoid that, but looks like i will have to bite the bullet :(#
22:02.45marl_scotthanks :)
22:03.03WIMPyYes, you probably want to avoid that.
22:05.31p3nguin_http://code.google.com/p/udptunnel/
22:05.50p3nguin_Wait, that's backward.
22:05.55p3nguin_disregard.
22:06.06marl_scotthanks p3nguin_  :)
22:06.20p3nguin_What about using socat or netcat?
22:06.55marl_scotnever had a lot of luck with netcat on windows :(
22:07.10p3nguin_This looks like your solution: http://nardcore.org/ctunnel/
22:07.27p3nguin_They don't know English, but maybe they can write a tunnel app.
22:08.17atan2Is there a cheap 411 provider out there?
22:08.27p3nguin_oh
22:08.29p3nguin_411.com
22:08.44p3nguin_Free 411 (Bing 411)
22:08.45*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.223.57.78)
22:08.46atan2p3nguin_, to forward my phone calls to?
22:08.52atan2For Canada, sorry
22:09.02atan2Bing-411 doesn't support the polar bears
22:09.08p3nguin_Actually, I'm full of fail today...
22:09.38p3nguin_Free 411 and Bing 411 are not the same.  I was thinking of 800-CALL-411 (it's Bing).
22:09.41*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@64.235.216.2)
22:10.12p3nguin_I'm all messed up.  I think I overdosed on Tramadol.
22:10.32p3nguin_drowsy, puking, generally feel like shit
22:10.45atan2If only their 411 databses were public records :P one could invent a service that costs $0.10 and provides the same features
22:10.50atan2Everyone would use it. I swear.
22:10.52marl_scotp3nguin_, not to much of an overdose, that ctunnel thing looks like it could be REALLY handy :)
22:10.54atan2Everyone without a computer anyway.
22:19.55atan2Hmm... I went wrong somewhere here. exten => _*661NXXNXXXXXX,1,Set(callerid=0000000000)
22:20.10atan2I just want to set it for the current call, not forever
22:20.18ManxPoweratan2, not using the correct syntax
22:20.35*** join/#asterisk hipitihop (~denis@202.153.71.87)
22:20.35p3nguin_Set(CALLERID(num)=1234567890)
22:22.09[TK]D-Fenderatan2: And that isn't "forever".  These are CHANNEL variables.  Guess when they die...
22:23.08atan2:P =)
22:23.57atan2So _*661NXXNXXXXXX would match *6619055551212 without any troubles but of course it would pass the entire *66+ portion of it over to ${EXTEN}. Any advice on how to snip the *66 off it?
22:24.29atan2I wouldn't just remove the *66 from line #2 would I?
22:25.05[TK]D-Fenderatan2: CHANNELVARIABLES.TEX <- read it
22:25.22a1faawww
22:25.25a1faasterisknow sucks :)
22:25.33a1faor is it freepbx thats awful
22:25.34a1fa;)
22:26.08*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
22:26.09ManxPower~tier2
22:26.09infobotsomebody said tier2 was #asterisk is not Tier 2 FreePBX/Trixbox Support!
22:26.25a1falol
22:26.26a1fa:(
22:27.04[TK]D-Fender~3rd
22:27.04infobotDon't even THINK about it!  Not third, forth OR fifth tier support!
22:27.08[TK]D-Fender..
22:27.12[TK]D-Fender~5th
22:27.13infobotGood grief..... ENOUGH already!
22:27.21[TK]D-Fender~6th ?
22:27.21infobotYou though you just needed to pass 5 didn't you?
22:27.28[TK]D-Fender~32nd ?
22:27.29infobotAnd no, I'm not falling for this either!
22:27.34[TK]D-Fender:D
22:28.55p3nguin_a1fa: If you think AsteriskNOW sucks, you're obviously doing it wrong.
22:29.08a1fawhich part
22:29.20[TK]D-Fenderprobably all of it :)
22:29.33p3nguin_That was my thought.
22:29.33*** join/#asterisk raden_work (~jon@69-179-99-17.stat.centurytel.net)
22:29.52a1fahehe :) hello d-fender
22:30.03p3nguin_While I am not a fan of a GUI, AsteriskNOW was quite nice when I tested it.
22:30.12a1fathe freepbx part?
22:32.02a1fanot a very well thought of layout
22:32.09a1fai need not complain
22:32.20a1faits free :)
22:35.22ManxPowerSo is an STD
22:35.51theharlol
22:36.16a1falol
22:36.34[TK]D-FenderNo, that prostitute was most certainly NOT free....
22:36.40p3nguin_You can apparently install AsteriskNOW without a GUI.
22:36.57citywokhaha, [TK]D-Fender some of us don't have to pay for it :P
22:38.02a1fa:X
22:38.20a1faanyway, I am withdrawing my pbx from a dmz to the inside network
22:39.35a1faand also virtualizing the hardware too
22:42.10pabelangerp3nguin_: I'm surprised to hear that wasn't an option before
22:42.37E-bolais wondierinbg if using realtime will get him a distributed asterisk
22:43.16citywokwondierinbg? sounds german to me
22:43.29E-bolawondering
22:44.19citywokis wondering if e-bola was asking a question, or just thinking out loud
22:45.01E-bolabit of both :)
22:45.17citywok~question
22:45.17infobotsomebody said question was If you have a question and want people to give useful answers, make sure you have read this first: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
22:45.27E-bolaI'm still searching for the best way to end up with an active-active asterisk cluster
22:45.43citywokso is everybody else.  I'd recommend looking up asterisk SCF
22:45.57E-bolathats not released out of beta yet?
22:46.13citywokit's not really... anything yet
22:46.39E-bolahence, i dont understand why you would recomend look at that?
22:47.30citywokb/c there isn't really an active-active solution out of box unless you feel like doing a lot of work.  http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+High+Availability+Solutions
22:48.30E-bolareading http://comunidad.asterisk-es.org/documentos/astricon2008/why-cluster-an-introduction-to-asterisk-clustering-and-database-integration-astricon-2008.pdf atm seems like ma nice doc
22:48.38E-bola-m
22:48.51citywoks/ma/a would probably work
22:48.58citywok:P
22:49.46E-bolaHmm i bet ile end up just usiong active/passive since there's a ton of options for that and its pretty easy
22:49.55E-bolai just detest active/passive from a general standpoint :)
22:50.49citywokthat doesn't even make sense.  you can't detest it.
22:50.57*** join/#asterisk iratik (~Adium@74-84-99-12.client.mchsi.com)
22:51.17citywokyou can definitely prefer active/active to active/passive, which would make sense. but you can't detest something that provides greatly increased reliability for free :P
22:51.46E-bolawell i detest to have to chose it over active/active :)
22:52.00E-bolaBut my reasons are ofcourse lame and stupid, but they remain valid for me :)
22:52.00*** join/#asterisk guilhermebr (~Guilherme@189.63.46.106)
22:52.42citywokfeel free to develop a good, functional active/active solution, i'm sure it will be accepted in to the code base with much thanks!
22:52.53citywokI know i'd appreciate it greatly
22:54.41E-bolai dont think an awefull lot is missing codebase wise
22:54.50E-bolaim just looking for an example
22:55.05citywokhow many concurrent phone calls are you supporting?
22:55.23E-bolanot much at all ~50
22:55.28E-bolabut its gonna grow
22:56.17citywokyea... what do you do that can't handle 50 dropped calls & 3 seconds of downtime?
22:56.43E-bolanothing
22:57.58*** join/#asterisk rrb3942 (~rbullock@cpe-67-242-215-62.rochester.res.rr.com)
23:00.44E-bolacitywok: http://danielaliaman.com/blog///index.php/2009/03/15/load_balance_asterisk_with_ultramonkey?blog=2 pretty much outlines what i want
23:00.50E-bolabut he leaves out the interesting part :/
23:02.47citywokwhat's the interesting part?
23:03.13E-bolathe realtime part
23:03.31E-bolaof basically how he handles integrating 3 asterisk servers in regards to having distributed queues, extensions etc
23:03.42citywokthat's by no means interesting.
23:03.46E-bolathe whole ip failover stuff etc, is basic linux ha setup
23:03.49citywokand he isn't providing support for distributed queues
23:04.33E-bolahow do you conclude that?
23:04.57citywokit doesn't look like he has anything provided to even check where a SIP client has registered to be able to route calls from one host to the other
23:05.00citywokbecause realtime * has no support for distributed queues, it has queue support, but it doesn't know which host the client has registered on.
23:05.13E-bolacitywok: dundi handles that?
23:07.24citywokthat isn't active/active either, lol
23:07.52citywokso really, it isn't what you are looking for unless you need to load balance thousands of calls (but if * failed, all calls on that node would be lost)
23:08.10E-bolai dont care so much for calls
23:08.27citywokif it has a heartbeat & a shared cluster ip it's active/passive
23:08.42E-bolamy main concern is, that if something fails. I want everything to automatically failover to another server. Either manually or automatically. And preferably as quick as possible
23:08.44atan2Inside an exten can you use if? like exten =>*1,n,if(${SERVICELEVEL} == 1) { Playback(enabled); } else { Playback(disabled); } ?
23:08.56citywokif you don't care about calls then all you need is active passive w/ heartbeat. not active/active.
23:08.58E-bolacitywok: it has both, did u read the pdf?
23:09.23citywoki'm looking at their diagram, the pdf just talks about setting up their load balancers and makes no mention of anything *
23:09.38[TK]D-Fenderatan2: "core show application gotoif"
23:09.43E-bolacitywok: my reason for not wanting to use active/passive, is that i dont have time to test it. With an active/active setup your sure it works. With an active/passive you dont know before something dies, or you test it
23:10.02atan2ty =)
23:10.09E-bolacitywok: I know thats what anoys me :)
23:10.10p3nguin_also ExecIf
23:10.18citywokso spend 200 hours trying to find an active/active solution, or 2 hours setting up active/passive and spend 5 minute testing it? seems logical to me :)
23:10.50E-bolacitywok: point is you have to continueally test it. It can potential break after every single software update etc etc.
23:11.02E-bolaactive/active has "built-in" testing. If its setup ideally anyway
23:11.11citywokif you have time to update the software, you should have time to spend a couple seconds testing failover :P
23:11.31E-bolacitywok: true, but remember then potential i make the cluster go down
23:11.37E-bolawhich isnt nice....
23:12.07*** join/#asterisk deltalytic (~lork@154.5.144.132)
23:12.07citywokif you have the ability to update your code i'm assuming you have an outage window to do that... i hope you don't just throw code on production servers and cross your fingers mid-day
23:12.40deltalyticDid 1.6 rid of the DNS bug that brings down all the phone if the asterisk server looses connection with the isp?
23:12.59citywokwhen i lose connection to my itsp i don't lose connectivity between phones
23:13.05E-bolacitywok: i do just throw code on production servers
23:13.17E-bolaafterhours, but i do just run apt-get update
23:13.23deltalyticcity, and you do not have your asterisk box pointed to a internal dns server?
23:13.25E-bolai dont test anything in a test enviroment beforehand
23:13.46citywokdeltalytic: yes, i do have it pointed internally.  i use a lot of internal resources.
23:14.03deltalyticokay
23:14.13citywokE-bola: lol, i am assuming you either very rarely change anything, your changes are minimal, or your track record is terrible. lol
23:14.30E-bolacitywok: change anything?
23:14.36deltalyticI am uncirtain how to create a simple internal dns. Not been able to get mine working since we had changed isps.
23:15.00fenrusbind is neat.
23:15.05citywokyou are saying if i lose connection to DNS, * stops letting phones connect?
23:15.25deltalyticyes, in 1.4 all phone loose registration with LOCAL asterisk box.
23:15.35deltalyticif loose dns from isp
23:15.42citywokE-bola: if i were you i'd change my process and get a test server. 50 concurrent calls (or did you mean users?) is a lot to be running around like a retard breaking things.
23:15.43p3nguin_Sounds like you need to update.
23:15.44deltalyticor just isp or down
23:15.51deltalyticIm running 1.6 now
23:16.01deltalyticBut still, cannot get local phone to register.
23:16.03citywokcan you link to the bug report on the issue tracker?
23:16.10p3nguin_I run 1.4, and I'm not familiar with that problem.
23:16.10E-bolacitywok: i dont think upgrading debian ever broke my asterisk
23:16.12citywokwhat does sip debug say?
23:16.24E-bolaand no i meant calls
23:16.36deltalyticp3nguin_,  mmm running a internal dns?
23:16.37citywokE-bola: yet. you mean yet.
23:16.54citywokand are you running testing branch? why do you need to apt-get update?
23:16.56E-bolayes, after 2 years of doing it this way, it havent broken yet
23:17.07E-bolacitywok: no i run stable/lenny
23:17.10p3nguin_deltalytic: I have an internal dns forwarder, which uses external DNS.
23:17.20p3nguin_Typical LAN stuff.
23:17.24E-bolawhy i need to apt-get update? umm are you serious?
23:17.35*** join/#asterisk csnook (~chris@209-6-38-66.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com)
23:17.54deltalyticp3nguin_,  if there was no internal dns, and you were to unplug the dsl, then all phones would drop off line.
23:17.58citywokstable tree doesn't change a whole lot, i don't update my production boxes very often in order to avoid breaking anything.
23:18.05*** join/#asterisk simplydrew_ (~simplydre@pool-96-238-59-82.prvdri.fios.verizon.net)
23:18.12*** join/#asterisk mpe (~mpe@0xd99d3f8f.customer.cybercity.dk)
23:18.14E-bolacitywok: there's constantly updates, so i dont know where you had that idea....
23:18.18citywokgood firewalling + updated * is my strategy
23:18.40deltalyticI MIGHT turn my asterisk box into a firewall
23:18.41citywoki haven't updated in 3 months, and have a total of 27 packages that need to be updated.  the only one i'd worry about is the openssl update.
23:18.46E-bolajust because packages dont change version, doesnt mean there arent security updates and bugfixes
23:19.08E-bolado you include volatile?
23:19.19citywokdefinitely not
23:20.05p3nguin_deltalytic: What if I configure no nameserver or a bad nameserver on the machine?  That would be the same as an external nameserver and no internet connection, right?
23:20.06citywokvolatile is worse than testing in debian land
23:20.08E-bolacitywok: u run ur * distributed/clustered in anyway?
23:20.15E-bolacitywok: nonesence
23:20.29deltalyticp3, very possibly
23:20.40deltalyticI need a way to make my 1.6 work without a isp
23:20.44citywokactive/passive, every 5 minutes i rsync everything from the production server to the standby server.
23:21.03p3nguin_deltalytic: You don't need an internet connection to make Asterisk work on a local network.
23:21.07E-bolacitywok: so if it fails over you loose all "states" and registrations?
23:21.17E-bolaqueue members, hints etc?
23:21.19deltalyticin 1.4 you do if not running dns. google it.
23:21.21citywoki've never had a production failure, so i don't use an automatic failover mechanism, anybody on our IT team goes and clicks a button, which fires up the slave.
23:21.26deltalyticin 1.6, i am not sure.
23:21.59p3nguin_deltalytic: I've just removed my nameserver entry from resolv.conf.  How long before I can't call another phone in-house?
23:22.04citywokqueue members are dynamic so stored in astdb which is rsync'd.  once the IP moves from primary to standby the phones will have to re-register before making a call.
23:22.21deltalyticp3, it may take a few min.
23:22.33citywokmy 25 concurrent calls and 150 users can wait 60 seconds, and the dropped calls aren't E911, we can just call back.
23:22.48E-bolacitywok: did u adjust the registry attemp timer on the phones down then?
23:22.53deltalyticcity, got a standard 911 land line?
23:23.18citywokdeltalytic: i mean we aren't an e911 center. lol.  no, we don't have 911 land line.  we use e911 from our provider.
23:23.30deltalyticokay
23:23.56citywokif anybody ever dials 911 we get an automatic notifcation of it sent to HR/reception as well as the persons manager, so everybody knows something is happening
23:23.59E-bolacitywok: when did u last test that the failover actualy works? :)
23:24.19citywok71 days ago, the last time i rebooted my servers and made any big changes
23:24.44citywoki actually upgraded my slave server, used the failover, then upgraded my primary server to * 1.6.2 from 1.6.1
23:24.48deltalyticcitywork, that is cool!
23:25.09citywokyea, write a simple perl scirpt and put it in front of the dial(911@itsp)
23:25.11deltalyticThat would be a good selling point to sell a asterisk system
23:25.18E-bolathat sort of active/passive is built into any newer virtualization platform if ur running it virtual
23:25.46citywoki have a 6 node hyper-v cluster, but i don't run * in it, i don't want to have to debug call quality issues through my cluster.
23:25.55citywokand thato nly provides hardware fault tolerance, not software
23:26.06citywokthat's kind of like thinking raid5 is a backup solution
23:26.09p3nguin_deltalytic: What else do I need to do to make my phone stop working?
23:26.32deltalyticp3, are you running 1.4?
23:26.33citywokdeltalytic: ~pb a sip debug of the failure
23:26.43p3nguin_(1716.10) <p3nguin_> I run 1.4, and I'm not familiar with that problem.
23:26.50deltalytick
23:26.59E-bolacitywok: it provides as much software failover as running an rsync script every xx mins
23:27.05atan2Can one SIP account have more than one context? So, err, you could hide features within each context? context=local,international,callreturn ?
23:27.10citywokdeltalytic: i also have it send the call chanspy() to the receptionist so they know what is going on.
23:27.16p3nguin_atan2: No.
23:27.32deltalyticcitywok, nice. are you the admin that put in asterisk?
23:27.38*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie)
23:27.42p3nguin_atan2: You must build an hierarchical structure with your contexts.
23:27.48citywokdeltalytic: yes, i wrote everything for it
23:27.56deltalyticnice
23:28.02atan2p3nguin_, okay. So each context itself can include another context?
23:28.10p3nguin_atan2: Do you need to see an example?
23:28.14citywokE-bola: i'm not worried about that stuff getting corrupted (which is tarred and backed up every hour to another server), i'm worried about debian shitting itself.
23:28.16atan2Just not within SIP, but rather the context itself?
23:28.45atan2What's the deal for inclusion? include => contextname ?
23:28.48E-bolacitywok: restoring a snapshot from ur virtualisation would protect against that
23:29.00E-bolawonders how much his voip traffic is going to rise
23:29.13E-bolaalready doing 17gb out and 17gb in everyday
23:29.29deltalyticE-bola, what service do you sell
23:29.48E-boladeltalytic: what do you mean?
23:30.14deltalytic<E-bola> already doing 17gb out and 17gb in everyday
23:30.26citywokhe wants to know what... you do
23:30.31E-bolaIts from our hosted pbx *
23:30.36deltalyticokay
23:30.45E-bolastill pretty small though
23:30.55citywokdeltalytic: if you are interested in how i do e911 i'd be happy to share it outside of this channel
23:30.57E-bolai just hadnt imagine it would use this much traffic to be honest
23:31.07citywokstop using ulaw :)
23:31.41E-bolalol ya i know. But since its in our datacenter i dont really care yet. Im just supprised at how much it accumulates to hehe
23:31.48deltalyticwell, I want to get my system up and running. Again! But, get past the blasted nat issue in client pcs. Did a demo once, failed big time because it could not register with my isp.
23:31.52deltalyticerr tisp
23:32.13E-bolasip + nat= continous nightmare
23:32.34deltalyticyea tell me about it. we have a new telus router, sucks. wont pass sip or rtp
23:32.56deltalyticSo, my want to put my asterisk box as the router to the isp.
23:32.58citywok50 concurrent calls of ulaw is 3,200kbps according to bandcalc.com
23:33.21citywokthat seems lower than it should be, i'd guess probably double that.
23:33.52deltalyticIs there a way a client can click into a web site to see port 5060 and rtp are open?
23:33.59E-bolacitywok: would be about 250gb a day
23:34.13p3nguin_atan2: http://pastebin.com/KcXQhU1E
23:34.15E-bolabut we are very very far from having 50 con. calls 24/7 so far
23:34.16citywokah, the asteriskguru calculator says 50 concurrent calls is 7.79mbps
23:34.47deltalyticSo who here knowns how to set up a basic dns?
23:34.49citywok7.79mbit is not 250gb, 7.79mbit is probably around 70gb
23:34.49E-bolapeaking is real bad for voip setups :)
23:34.51deltalyticserver?
23:35.03atan2p3nguin_, ty =)
23:35.18p3nguin_deltalytic: Still waiting for something exciting to happen.  I can still call other phones.
23:35.27deltalytictry
23:35.32citywokE-bola: 7.79mbit is roughly 84,132mb/day
23:35.59citywok7.79*60/8 = 58MB/minute * 60 * 24 = 84,132/day
23:36.21E-bolayes but having to handle 50 con. call during peak is extremely far from handling on avg 50 con. call always
23:36.30E-bolaluckily people tend not to use the work phones much at night :)
23:37.08*** join/#asterisk roninarg (~asteriskr@190.113.140.28)
23:37.21citywokIf you ran 50 concurrent calls for 24 hours you would rack up 84gb of ulaw, or 25gb of g729
23:37.32p3nguin_deltalytic: If you can't tell me how to replicate the problem, I have to assume the problem does not exist.
23:37.44deltalyticp3, google is.
23:37.46deltalyticit
23:37.50deltalyticits online.
23:37.56p3nguin_You google it.  My phones still work.
23:37.58citywokif you show us a sip debug we might be able to help
23:38.00E-bolalol
23:38.08deltalytic:)
23:38.19deltalyticI am not running 1.4
23:38.28p3nguin_But I am, and the problem does not exist.
23:38.36E-bolaI'm off to bed, nighty
23:38.50deltalyticbut I upgraded to 1.6 since I did read the dns but was rectified in this version.
23:39.01*** join/#asterisk kfife (~Miranda@home.chicagoventure.com)
23:39.06citywokso deltalytic what are you talking about?
23:39.12p3nguin_Oh, Karl.
23:39.15citywokyou installed it, and it works. what's your problem?
23:39.27kfifep3nguin_: Hey
23:39.50deltalytichttps://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=12941
23:40.15deltalytichttp://fonality.com/trixbox/forums/trixbox-forums/trunks/sip-trunk-registration-problem-brings-local-calls-troubles
23:40.31deltalyticknown issue with 1.4
23:40.52*** join/#asterisk mpe (~mpe@0xd99d3f8f.customer.cybercity.dk)
23:40.55deltalytichttp://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433779
23:41.04deltalyticanyway back to my work
23:41.09*** join/#asterisk pampa (~pampa_2@190.113.140.28)
23:41.28*** join/#asterisk Chilling_Silence (~Master@222-153-107-169.jetstream.xtra.co.nz)
23:42.05citywokthe issue was never reproduced, and was just closed... that doesn't prove anything
23:42.12kfifeoops
23:42.32p3nguin_It looks like the problem existed on 1.4.21 and disappeared in 1.4.22.
23:42.40p3nguin_TWO YEARS AGO.
23:42.54citywokgood thng he spent 20 minutes in here talking about it
23:42.55deltalyticyea long ago
23:42.55pabelangerHeh, I did know res_phoneprov only worked with users.conf
23:43.02citywokkinda like e-bola being a dumbass. lol
23:43.24deltalyticIve been using asterisk for a long time. But dumped 1.4 for this reason.
23:44.13p3nguin_YOu could have just upgraded a version and been done with it.
23:44.14citywoki "dumped" 1.4 b/c 1.6 had more features and worked better w/ dahdi
23:44.56p3nguin_I'll dump 1.4 when 1.8.3 comes out.
23:45.08citywokhaha
23:45.40*** join/#asterisk panicou (~panicou@cust-188-2.on3.ontelecoms.gr)
23:45.44atan2If you wanted to give a SIP user the option to press '7' while on a call to record the call, can you think of a way to do it without causing hell for IVRs? Like if they call their bank and start entering card number 6667...
23:45.45Chilling_SilenceHi all, I'm having issues with connecting Cisco Call Manager and Asterisk (Asterisk 1.4.21.2~dfsg-3+lenny1). If we have a call come in through CCM which handles our PRI, it gets passed off to an asterisk IVR just fine. However when I  make a call from a Softphone (ZoIPer) or SPA942 attached to the Asterisk, to any form of extension on the CCM, the quality is terrible, even though they're ulaw (Native bridging). Same poor qua
23:45.56deltalyticbtw, I cannot get my phones to register with 1.6. Not using internet at this time. Anyone care to look at the conf configurations?
23:46.04p3nguin_atan2: Don't use just '7'
23:46.12deltalyticthis is perhaps a different issue.
23:46.15citywoklolololol
23:46.18p3nguin_atan2: Use the normal feature code for automon.  See features.conf.
23:46.23[TK]D-Fenderdeltalytic: show us the FAILURE
23:46.33citywok[TK]D-Fender: the only failure is in his head
23:46.58p3nguin_There was failure... in June 2008.
23:47.00pabelangerp3nguin_: So your upgrading you boxes in February?
23:47.44[TK]D-Fenderatan2:  "core show application dial" + features.conf
23:47.48p3nguin_I refuse to use 1.8 while it is still so new.  By 1.8.3, I expect many of the problems will be worked out.
23:48.00*** join/#asterisk pkecastillo (~pirruar@190.113.140.28)
23:49.17p3nguin_For production systems, that is.  I'd probably test 1.8.0 without too much fuss.
23:50.55p3nguin_atan2: Oh, I see a typo I made in that example.  That'll give you something to debug if you copy my example and try to use it.
23:51.17*** join/#asterisk slidesinger (~slidesing@c-68-44-99-163.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
23:51.46atan2p3nguin_, en => _NX?
23:52.08p3nguin_atan2: What?
23:52.53p3nguin_exten => _NXXNXXXXXX,1,Dial(SIP/itsp/1${EXTEN})
23:53.00p3nguin_This provides 10-digit dialing.
23:53.06p3nguin_Nothing wrong with it that I can see.
23:54.00pkecastillohola roninarg
23:54.30pkecastillohello roninarg , sorry guys!
23:54.48roninarghi teacher pkecastillo
23:54.49pampahi pkecastillo
23:55.02deltalyticdenada
23:55.47atan2p3nguin_, using automon (I uncommented it in features.conf) it doesn't seem to record? is there a second file that relates to it? Do I need to build it into the dialplan?
23:56.05atan2I'd like to save recordings based on their accountcode where possible =)
23:56.27p3nguin_atan2:  (1747.45) <[TK]D-Fender> atan2:  "core show application dial" + features.conf
23:56.48atan2^_^ will do
23:56.58p3nguin_Hint: Take a look at w and W.
23:58.01atan2That just enables it for the user? =)
23:58.16p3nguin_What is the "user" you keep talking about?
23:58.31atan2Whoever has control of the SIP phone connected
23:58.37atan2Not the caller who is calling it
23:58.58p3nguin_The Dial() options have nothing to do with the people.
23:59.06*** join/#asterisk Dovid (Dovid@69.167.68.146)
23:59.29Dovidanyone here ever use sangoma transcoder card ?

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.