| 03:29.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 03:32.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sh_smith (~sh_smith@cpe-172-88-21-24.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 03:33.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 05:09.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero (~pchero@211.178.226.108) |
| 05:09.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o pchero] by ChanServ |
| 05:09.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pchero (~pchero@211.178.226.108) |
| 05:09.58 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o pchero] by ChanServ |
| 10:01.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev AsteriskRoss (~AsteriskR@r01.nt-r1.nor.gb.voicehost.co.uk) |
| 10:02.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev AsteriskRoss_ (~AsteriskR@r01.nt-r1.nor.gb.voicehost.co.uk) |
| 10:35.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 12:52.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 15:01.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (uid358942@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ebooxntwacgeqhbv) |
| 15:01.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 15:11.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |
| 15:32.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-kfzxckxelnwdrjfr) |
| 15:32.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 15:33.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d00dd6c39e4e3d4e964.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 16:24.43 | AsteriskRoss_ | Quick question, if a register is sent to Asterisk and we are checking for NAT on a contact, should the contact in the 200 be preserved or corrected to have the correct ports? At the moment the latter is happening and some devices do not match the register. |
| 16:25.36 | file | you've already asked that before, and gtjoseph wrote code to preserve it |
| 16:26.16 | AsteriskRoss_ | I thought I had, but it appears to have reverted |
| 16:28.35 | file | https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28502 don't believe anyone has explicitly worked in that area or on that code, but not to say something else hasn't rippled to it |
| 16:41.43 | AsteriskRoss_ | I've raised an issue and sent an email with a SIP Trace showing the issue |
| 16:41.50 | AsteriskRoss_ | Thank you for your assistance |
| 17:16.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev AsteriskRoss_ (~AsteriskR@37.157.48.2) |
| 17:40.31 | seanbright | would a jitterbuffer affect a mixmonitor? |
| 17:40.41 | seanbright | or an audiohook, i guess i should say |
| 17:41.01 | file | I don't... think so? I can't recall the ordering |
| 17:41.14 | seanbright | mkay |
| 19:00.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (~dwayne@2605:a601:a816:5000:f7ce:535c:c78:9ec3) |
| 19:00.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 19:19.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev AsteriskRoss_ (~AsteriskR@37.157.48.2) |
| 22:03.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev AsteriskRoss_ (~AsteriskR@37.157.48.2) |
| 22:30.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tuxd00d (sid401305@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qbegrktyudkiuubu) |
| 22:30.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-yjustarvqvflypmk) |
| 22:30.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 22:30.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mvanbaak (~mvanbaak@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 22:30.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mvanbaak] by ChanServ |
| 23:57.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev spatel (~spatel@pool-96-237-230-175.bstnma.fios.verizon.net) |