| 07:18.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:6990:7010:3ebb:7624) |
| 07:25.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@lstlambert-657-1-90-73.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 08:19.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.121) |
| 10:21.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtjoseph@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 10:21.15 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o gtjoseph] by ChanServ |
| 13:28.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@185.122.102.68) |
| 13:32.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@185.122.102.68) |
| 14:05.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.203.61) |
| 15:05.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:d8e4:5389:1016:131f) |
| 15:08.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:d8e4:5389:1016:131f) |
| 15:17.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@lstlambert-657-1-90-73.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 15:21.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (uid358942@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-jrtriauyfodsmamt) |
| 15:21.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 15:31.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bford (uid283514@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-igyhpfqothglogyt) |
| 15:31.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 16:43.35 | kharwell | so there appears to be a race between when channels are bridged, and the type of bridge chosen vs. media negotiated and applied |
| 16:44.18 | kharwell | in this one case for instance if the media for two channels join bridge is applied and available then native bridging is chosen |
| 16:44.52 | kharwell | if one is missing then Asterisk chooses simple, which then issues a topology change, which initiates a re-invite |
| 16:46.27 | kharwell | I guess the question is do we care? Do we care that a native bridge (possibly the best one to use in this case) could have been chosen, but wasn't because the media wasn't there yet when checking bridge compatibility? |
| 16:47.37 | file | when the dust settles, does it re-evaluate? |
| 16:48.33 | kharwell | hrm not sure about that yet. Currently it is causing a test to fail I'm looking at thus stops before getting to that point |
| 16:48.57 | file | I think as long as it gets there in the end it's fine |
| 16:49.03 | kharwell | even so at the very least it'll send out an unecessary re-invite for the topology change |
| 16:49.20 | file | PJSIP could potentially be altered to squash that in that scenario |
| 16:49.36 | file | since at least 1 SDP negotiation isn't complete yet, you don't know yet |
| 16:49.44 | kharwell | "change" that is. I think it's thinking there is topology difference between the channels because again, no media on the one |
| 16:49.50 | kharwell | yeah |
| 16:50.32 | file | nods |
| 16:50.34 | file | yeah, it probably is |
| 16:50.57 | file | it'd be nice if we could synchronize that SDP negotiation, but I looked and it wasn't immediately obvious how to do it safely... |
| 16:51.25 | kharwell | yeah |
| 20:39.27 | seanbright | we have another one |
| 20:39.37 | seanbright | "i have a problem i need help with" |
| 20:39.46 | seanbright | "ok, can you provide information x?" |
| 20:40.01 | seanbright | "x!? are you insane or just stupid?!" |
| 20:40.35 | gtjoseph | I wish I could have met you last week. |
| 20:40.49 | seanbright | samesies |
| 20:41.05 | seanbright | we'll always have paris |
| 20:41.06 | kharwell | awww |
| 20:41.18 | seanbright | i met evil bford |
| 20:41.25 | seanbright | he's like normal bford but with a goatee |
| 20:41.42 | gtjoseph | heh, yeah. |
| 20:41.53 | file | you also met "I've had a drink or two" bford |
| 20:41.55 | bford | pics or it didn't happen |
| 20:42.03 | gtjoseph | he didn't try the neck pinch on you did he? |
| 20:42.19 | seanbright | i wouldn't let him anywhere near my neck |
| 20:42.33 | seanbright | (no offense) |
| 20:42.36 | seanbright | <3 |
| 20:43.18 | seanbright | why am i afraid that this frame memory leak is because of my audiohooks patch? |
| 20:44.04 | file | seanbright: paranoia? |
| 20:44.22 | seanbright | i don't have a great track record |
| 20:52.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d00f4d7ddd1bc0987bc.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 20:54.54 | seanbright | i feel like we have not been provided adequate information |
| 20:55.12 | file | it's a bit like pulling teeth |
| 21:01.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sahmed (~sahmed@cpe-70-114-236-63.austin.res.rr.com) |
| 21:08.07 | sahmed | Hello, I have a question on https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28495, |
| 21:08.07 | sahmed | recently we have a crash, it seems its related to ASTERISK-28495. Our running asterisk version is 13. So, does it fit to release 13? |
| 21:09.16 | file | the code is completely different in 13 |
| 21:09.51 | file | it's likely something else |
| 21:10.37 | sahmed | okay, thanks for confirming |