| 00:02.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Amnesia (~Amnesia@unaffiliated/amnesia) |
| 00:22.10 | gtjoseph | Oooohboy: you don't set it in Asterisk, you set it in the environment before starting Asterisk. |
| 00:27.51 | Oooohboy | gtjoseph: ok thanks |
| 00:30.14 | snuff-work | gtjoseph: sorry i didn't see your patch test request |
| 00:30.25 | snuff-work | don't monitor that email addr often |
| 00:30.27 | gtjoseph | no prob |
| 00:31.35 | snuff-work | anyone else had a chance to look at my other issue that still happens.. relates to SDP data.. 27079.. been there since july 2017 =) |
| 00:32.40 | gtjoseph | is there a SWP issue related to it? |
| 00:33.14 | snuff-work | SWP-9840Â |
| 00:33.46 | gtjoseph | i can't look now but i will in the AM. Well, my AM. :) |
| 00:33.52 | snuff-work | all good |
| 00:49.25 | snuff-work | gtjoseph: only part that didn't apply of ur patch was deleting bunch relating to reload_module |
| 00:49.32 | snuff-work | for patch 0003 |
| 00:49.41 | snuff-work | will test it in the next hr or so |
| 00:49.49 | gtjoseph | hmmm |
| 00:50.07 | snuff-work | aka hunk 5 |
| 00:50.32 | gtjoseph | odd. i'll have to look in the AM again |
| 00:50.53 | snuff-work | np.. i will try with it not there.. as i doubt it will affect results |
| 00:51.13 | snuff-work | and leave a msg in case so u dont need to trawl the chat =) |
| 00:51.32 | gtjoseph | thx |
| 01:19.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 01:19.58 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Check out our blog! blogs.asterisk.org -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 02:27.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (~textual@2604:2d80:8404:ffae:d86f:838a:1b8e:d587) |
| 02:27.32 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 03:11.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@2605:6000:1711:c1ff:407d:634d:a14b:242e) |
| 03:33.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@2605:6000:1711:c1ff:5de1:182:e755:ba7a) |
| 03:38.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@2605:6000:1711:c1ff:5de1:182:e755:ba7a) |
| 03:44.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@2605:6000:1711:c1ff:5de1:182:e755:ba7a) |
| 05:26.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (~textual@2604:2d80:8404:ffae:d822:65d:d246:a4b2) |
| 05:26.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 07:19.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@uls-154-73-35-201.wall.uls.co.za) |
| 07:51.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01:e0a:d:1111:d4d8:3255:ad8e:8e11) |
| 07:54.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:54.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 07:58.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tsearle (~tsearle@37.19.10.33) |
| 07:58.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tsearle] by ChanServ |
| 08:12.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@72-48-251-4.dyn.grandenetworks.net) |
| 08:21.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@72-48-251-4.dyn.grandenetworks.net) |
| 08:23.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@72-48-251-4.dyn.grandenetworks.net) |
| 08:32.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 09:06.23 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Amnesia (~Amnesia@unaffiliated/amnesia) |
| 11:16.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bounceman (~bounceman@185.32.9.250) |
| 11:18.10 | bounceman | Hello, would you suggest this to be submitted as a bug or would it be something else causing the issue? http://codepad.org/8lYfFYzG Issue is that after the attended transfer has been performed and the transferee target has been put into the bridge, it starts MoH. Which is really frustrating. |
| 14:59.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-fshymxsvkxclykkh) |
| 14:59.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 15:03.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (textual@nat/digium/x-kpscjoicvohydlgl) |
| 15:03.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 15:22.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bford (d8cff501@gateway/web/freenode/ip.216.207.245.1) |
| 15:22.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bford] by ChanServ |
| 15:30.40 | kharwell | So back on testsuite stuff. We decided to not do tags for RCs. Was thinking though do we want to create a tag for every non RC release too? |
| 15:30.58 | kharwell | Since we are keeping the branch around until the next release we could just tag the branch right before deletion with the last version to be released (or something like '13.20.x'). |
| 15:31.18 | kharwell | This would make for fewer tags and alleviate multiple tags pointing to the same spot. However we lose some ganularity. Thoughts? |
| 15:33.15 | gtjoseph | i'm ok with that. |
| 15:44.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-ejrfueotmormcwfx) |
| 15:44.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o rmudgett] by ChanServ |
| 16:03.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (textual@nat/digium/x-fnppcbmvwktfdojp) |
| 16:03.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 16:10.26 | coreyfarrell | kharwell: that seems reasonable to me. |
| 16:18.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Worldexe (~Worldexe@95-107-33-134.dsl.orel.ru) |
| 16:19.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 16:19.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 16:30.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jkroon (~jkroon@165.16.204.162) |
| 16:41.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 16:41.48 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Check out our blog! blogs.asterisk.org -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 16:45.21 | seanbright | can someone with the appropriate permissions abandon/delete this review |
| 16:45.23 | seanbright | https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/8207/ |
| 16:45.50 | file | request completed successfully |
| 16:45.56 | seanbright | danke |
| 16:45.59 | gtjoseph | youbeat me to it |
| 17:20.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dakudos (~dakudos@c-73-203-6-107.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 17:51.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d00f03306cd7f107e01.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 18:06.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_1 (~Thunderbi@LFbn-1-5195-12.w90-105.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 18:20.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d00d8e434b91e9a165a.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 19:01.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (textual@nat/digium/x-fpqsqowjkerpziiy) |
| 19:01.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 19:16.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cresl1n (Adium@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 19:16.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 19:39.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (textual@nat/digium/x-yzeurvqytigeklmf) |
| 19:39.27 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 19:51.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Oooohboy (~Oooohboy@cpe-67-11-10-120.satx.res.rr.com) |
| 20:14.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (textual@nat/digium/x-epfhhyqcrlhliuxm) |
| 20:14.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 20:30.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev karl370 (~karl@cpe-142-129-161-190.socal.res.rr.com) |
| 20:40.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@62-90-199-247.barak.net.il) |
| 20:40.58 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 20:58.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jhord (~jhord@c-73-181-14-245.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 20:58.47 | jhord | wondering if someone could help with NAT hacking for Cisco phones |
| 20:59.27 | gtjoseph | i think you're better off asking in #asterisk |
| 20:59.56 | jhord | it seems pjsip always to send to a URI, but I would like to be able to change port assignment for a particular contact based on the registration port/contact details. |
| 21:00.20 | seanbright | oh, well in that case, you're better off asking in #asterisk |
| 21:39.49 | seanbright | is there a convenient way to get a pj_str_t into a 0 terminated char *? |
| 21:40.14 | seanbright | other than: snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%.*s", (int) whatever.slen, whatever.ptr); |
| 21:40.18 | seanbright | which is not "convenient" |
| 21:41.50 | seanbright | ast_copy_string? |
| 21:41.54 | seanbright | i guess that could work |
| 21:42.23 | file | seanbright: ast_copy_pj_str? |
| 21:42.41 | seanbright | that might be the winner |
| 21:43.27 | seanbright | hmm |
| 21:43.37 | seanbright | oh. no. that's perfect. |
| 22:05.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_1 (~Thunderbi@LFbn-1-5195-12.w90-105.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 22:32.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-work (~snuff-wor@210.9.148.102) |
| 22:32.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-work] by ChanServ |
| 22:42.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-iovxeshrqaplebme) |
| 22:42.49 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kharwell] by ChanServ |
| 23:14.23 | snuff-work | gtjoseph: got caught up.. trying to test it again today, initally when i tried i got a core dump (running in dev mode might be a part of it) |
| 23:29.07 | snuff-work | https://pastebin.ca/3973617 |
| 23:32.40 | snuff-work | mm might have also been extra file.. re-testing now |
| 23:48.21 | snuff-work | ok appears just the extra file was left behind |
| 23:48.30 | snuff-work | will add notes to case |