| 00:21.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 00:21.44 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Check out our blog! blogs.asterisk.org -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 00:25.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dovid (~dovid@ool-4573a525.dyn.optonline.net) |
| 18:07.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 18:07.04 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Check out our blog! blogs.asterisk.org -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 18:07.41 | cresl1n | So in mjordan's original scenario, without record-route, it should send the ACK to the address listed in the Contact header? |
| 18:11.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev joshelson (~joshelson@c-73-34-214-163.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 18:13.07 | mjordan | welp. Then I would expect what I'm doing to work, as I'm adding a RR header with loose routing. |
| 18:13.10 | mjordan | So I'm not crazy at least. |
| 18:14.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev w9sh (~dad@c-73-184-204-13.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) |
| 18:31.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev joshelson (~joshelson@c-73-34-214-163.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 18:40.01 | seanbright | sweet/ we |
| 18:40.03 | seanbright | err |
| 18:40.04 | seanbright | we |
| 18:40.06 | seanbright | holy shit |
| 18:40.23 | seanbright | my right hand was one too many keys to the right |
| 18:40.39 | seanbright | was going to say: sweet! we're back to 'unstable' instead of failing |
| 18:42.24 | file | better! |
| 18:51.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ZX81 (~Adium@190.218.46.17) |
| 18:51.54 | *** part/#asterisk-dev ZX81 (~Adium@190.218.46.17) |
| 18:52.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.cust.se.alltele.net) |
| 18:52.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 18:53.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ZX81 (~Adium@190.218.46.17) |
| 18:53.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ZX81 (~Adium@190.218.46.17) |
| 19:10.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tuxd00d (~tuxd00d@66.23.136.140) |
| 19:17.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ZX81 (~Adium@190.218.46.17) |
| 19:18.11 | *** part/#asterisk-dev ZX81 (~Adium@190.218.46.17) |
| 19:31.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (textual@nat/digium/x-gcyuypssqeuocgiw) |
| 19:31.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leedm777] by ChanServ |
| 19:38.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~oej@h87-96-134-129.cust.se.alltele.net) |
| 19:38.26 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 19:47.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dovid (~dovid@ool-4573a525.dyn.optonline.net) |
| 19:59.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CELYA_ (~Thunderbi@2a01cb0583d31d002dc6d389f14d7c6a.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr) |
| 20:44.09 | *** part/#asterisk-dev w9sh (~dad@c-73-184-204-13.hsd1.ga.comcast.net) |
| 21:05.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-82-81-175-197.red.bezeqint.net) |
| 21:05.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 21:12.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-82-81-175-197.red.bezeqint.net) |
| 21:12.31 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 21:18.01 | seanbright | is it a logical error to set a format on a frame that is not an AST_FRAME_VOICE frame? |
| 21:18.23 | file | yes |
| 21:18.28 | seanbright | ok |
| 21:19.12 | seanbright | so if a frameout function on a translator wants to return something that is not an AST_FRAME_VOICE, how should it go about that? |
| 21:19.27 | file | carefully. |
| 21:19.49 | seanbright | ASTERISK-26880 is caused because codec_speex is returning an AST_FRAME_CNG frame |
| 21:20.18 | seanbright | and the code in bridge_softmix doesn't check that the returned frame is a voice frame |
| 21:20.45 | file | it should |
| 21:20.52 | seanbright | ok |
| 21:21.02 | file | you can't assume it's a voice frame |
| 21:23.08 | seanbright | so what i gather is that the translator is being passed a voice frame |
| 21:23.15 | seanbright | but when it comes out it's a CNG frame |
| 21:23.30 | file | aye |
| 21:23.49 | seanbright | so at what point do we care? |
| 21:23.55 | seanbright | the frame that comes back i assume |
| 21:24.20 | file | I think we may pass it through on some channel drivers, but for CNG... it's iffy |
| 21:24.23 | file | and bridge_softmix shouldn't care |
| 21:24.52 | seanbright | testing |
| 21:26.30 | rmudgett | Not much code even knows what to do with a CNG frame. |
| 21:27.12 | file | rmudgett: I was wondering earlier if you were even around - you've been too quiet |
| 21:27.13 | file | I don't like it |
| 21:29.08 | rmudgett | People might think your .... up to something... |
| 21:29.23 | rmudgett | s/your/you're/ |
| 21:58.37 | seanbright | do you guys maintain an internal git-svn of pjproject? |
| 21:58.57 | file | no |
| 21:59.05 | seanbright | what do you use? |
| 21:59.19 | seanbright | your third-party patches look like format-patch formatted |
| 21:59.47 | file | magic! |
| 21:59.56 | file | actually I don't know what rmudgett and gtjoseph use |
| 22:00.15 | cresl1n | gtg, time to turn back into a dad |
| 22:00.16 | gtjoseph | that's what they are |
| 22:00.19 | cresl1n | ttfn |
| 22:00.33 | file | cresl1n: kbye |
| 22:00.46 | cresl1n | spins file |
| 22:00.53 | gtjoseph | we generally submit them to Teluu based on their github mirror |
| 22:01.12 | seanbright | gtjoseph: where is that mirror? |
| 22:01.28 | file | https://github.com/pjsip/pjproject |
| 22:01.30 | seanbright | oh |
| 22:01.31 | seanbright | sure enough |
| 22:01.41 | file | hopefully they try to move to git for real again... |
| 22:39.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-work (~snuff-wor@210.9.148.102) |
| 22:39.37 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-work] by ChanServ |
| 23:15.01 | seanbright | lol at "Private Name" on jira |
| 23:15.13 | seanbright | his reputation proceeds him |
| 23:15.20 | seanbright | precedes? |
| 23:15.22 | seanbright | one of those |
| 23:15.43 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-rleiklflqahqgwze) |
| 23:15.50 | file | seanbright: words |