| 02:16.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 02:24.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (~leedm777@50-81-28-152.client.mchsi.com) |
| 03:19.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (~leedm777@50-81-28-152.client.mchsi.com) |
| 04:16.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ylsesvbtplbtzspz) |
| 05:38.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev doome_ (~doome@82.150.48.146) |
| 08:07.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (~infobot@rikers.org) |
| 08:07.15 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Hell hath frozen over: Asterisk is moving to Git -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 08:37.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev doome_ (~doome@82.150.48.146) |
| 09:31.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@gatekeeper.loca.net) |
| 10:21.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jrose_atDigium (jrose_atDi@nat/digium/session) |
| 10:23.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jrose_atDigium (jrose_atDi@nat/digium/x-zfxqqacyagwrqeis) |
| 10:53.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@p4FC31183.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 11:11.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@p4FC31183.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 11:35.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev zerohalo (~zerohalo@2601:6:f80:224:38a2:127b:d045:41e8) |
| 12:24.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216-191-106-163.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 13:40.03 | leifmadsen | I just want to confirm that last asterisk-dev email was indeed May 22 :) |
| 13:40.09 | leifmadsen | and that the list isn't broken |
| 13:43.18 | file | correct |
| 13:52.04 | leifmadsen | ok great :) |
| 13:52.26 | leifmadsen | I only signed up recently, and hadn't gotten an email yet, so wasn't sure if my work was filtering or what |
| 13:52.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 13:52.39 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 13:53.53 | skrusty | file: we changed the list to private right when leifmadsen joined? ;) |
| 13:54.05 | file | shhhhhh |
| 13:54.13 | skrusty | d'oh :) |
| 13:54.40 | leifmadsen | :D |
| 14:07.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (leedm777@nat/digium/x-drpwvzxkkbhfrijc) |
| 14:10.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgalarneau (Adium@nat/digium/x-mcmnlhqcfslqklua) |
| 14:12.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:12.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:14.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-jbgyhbyieacftnsz) |
| 14:27.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 14:27.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 14:28.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (rmudgett@nat/digium/x-sgdqlcrvjrbrcwxb) |
| 14:36.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 14:45.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev superscrat (~asanders@99-194-177-34.dyn.centurytel.net) |
| 14:53.41 | gtjoseph | coreyfarrell: you need anything else from that test run yesterday before I nuke it? |
| 14:58.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgriepentrog (sgriepentr@nat/digium/x-eulqnjzvosxyusrp) |
| 14:59.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (leedm777@nat/digium/x-tgjrvrweyarywojt) |
| 15:00.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-ihndaljylbzjpkfb) |
| 15:15.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-hlrujhmncguuklph) |
| 15:15.41 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 15:20.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgriepentrog (sgriepentr@nat/digium/x-bazjlonjaddnknaz) |
| 15:44.47 | file | rmudgett, your in-dialog auth has +1s from both Mark and I - do you want to hold off on submission until the master version is done? |
| 15:46.23 | rmudgett | file: The master version should just be a cherry pick. A follow on patch in master would just remove the unneeded file. |
| 15:46.36 | file | would you like to cherry pick or shall I? |
| 15:47.08 | rmudgett | I'll do it. As it should go into the 13.1-cert branch too |
| 15:47.30 | file | k |
| 15:53.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 15:53.33 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 16:10.10 | tzafrir | sruffell, hi |
| 16:10.16 | sruffell | hello |
| 16:10.22 | tzafrir | (Also: is Russ around?) |
| 16:10.43 | sruffell | I didn't see him earlier..let me go check. |
| 16:11.01 | tzafrir | I wonder if a new release of DAHDI is expected in the coming weeks |
| 16:12.06 | tzafrir | If not, we'll also get the rest of the patches of dahdi tools (xpp xtalk changes) in |
| 16:13.14 | sruffell | Hmm..I don't see him yet. But I expect him to be in today. As far as a release, I'm not sure what he is planning. I mentioned on Friday that I would probably release a 2.10.2+2.10.1 to fix the Fedora issues, but he didn't say he would do it one way or the other. |
| 16:31.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@x55b380b2.dyn.telefonica.de) |
| 16:43.41 | sruffell | tzafrir: rmeyerriecks just emailed saying he needs to take today off. |
| 17:18.26 | jsmith | sruffell: Fedora issues? Good to know we're still causing grief :-) |
| 17:19.22 | sruffell | :) I think the last three kernel release Fedora has adopted the released kernel before DAHDI released a version with support for it, even though the changes were sitting in DAHDI's trunk. |
| 17:20.12 | sruffell | Butâ¦.rmeyerriecks decides when dahdi-linux is released now. |
| 17:21.06 | sruffell | (if only we could upstream DAHDI...) |
| 17:22.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ipengineer (~zconkle@static-71-252-134-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net) |
| 17:30.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev superscrat (~asanders@99-194-177-34.dyn.centurytel.net) |
| 17:59.10 | putnopvut | file: since mjordan is not around, would you have any problem with me submitting the sorcery cache AMI/CLI patchset? Or do you feel like it's a good idea to get a +1 from someone else on it first? |
| 17:59.18 | file | nope |
| 17:59.37 | file | another set of eyes would be nice, but I think it's straight forward enough |
| 17:59.43 | file | your staleness needs to go in first though |
| 18:00.24 | file | there - I submitted it |
| 18:00.28 | putnopvut | Okay cool. |
| 18:00.36 | putnopvut | Thank you very much |
| 18:04.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (RustyNewto@nat/digium/x-ghevlweqlkrbdqys) |
| 18:04.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 18:06.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@x55b3a84b.dyn.telefonica.de) |
| 18:17.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev superscrat (~asanders@99-194-177-34.dyn.centurytel.net) |
| 18:47.33 | coreyfarrell | gtjoseph: If you had gotten much different results than when I run it I would have asked for more files, but I think I'm good. thanks for running the test and helping me find that weird build interaction with the #define strcmp on your system. |
| 18:47.55 | gtjoseph | sure thing! |
| 18:55.06 | coreyfarrell | does anyone know of a way to ast_debug the address range(s) of code from a dlopen? I asked in glibc but the only response was about dlinfo - I don't think that will tell me what I need. if I get a backtrace with no symbol names because dlclose was run I want to compare the pointer to the list of ranges found after dlclose, identify the module that was called after unload. |
| 19:06.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wdoekes (~walter@wjd.osso.nl) |
| 19:08.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (uid27319@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dthxsgrmhbrevmws) |
| 19:14.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-179-40-172.cust.bezeqint.net) |
| 19:14.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 19:40.42 | roramirez | hi guys! |
| 19:43.11 | roramirez | file, are you there? |
| 19:43.17 | file | yes |
| 19:44.31 | roramirez | hi |
| 19:45.07 | file | hello |
| 19:46.09 | roramirez | i'm confused on review 404, sorry. But is prevent race condition should by a set a new var on cdr_log for cdr log file. |
| 19:46.34 | roramirez | and used the lock existing |
| 19:47.02 | file | f_lock needs to be locked while file_csv_master is changed |
| 19:52.54 | roramirez | ok, understand. |
| 19:53.04 | roramirez | i send new review, sorry. |
| 19:59.10 | rmudgett | file: Not adding them does lay a trap if the unload change is backported to the cert branch. |
| 19:59.18 | file | it won't be |
| 19:59.36 | rmudgett | k I'll remove that part then. |
| 20:14.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DivideBy0 (~DivideBy0@unaffiliated/divideby0x0) |
| 20:36.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ipengineer_ (~zconkle@static-71-252-134-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net) |
| 20:58.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ipengineer (~zconkle@static-71-252-134-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net) |
| 21:00.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2) |
| 21:43.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 22:22.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leedm777 (~leedm777@50-81-28-152.client.mchsi.com) |
| 22:49.14 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kharwell (kharwell@nat/digium/x-jbgyhbyieacftnsz) |
| 22:54.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~joe@64.235.216.2) |
| 23:00.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 23:01.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 23:04.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 23:21.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 23:28.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 23:29.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fornax (~fornax@85.183.43.221) |
| 23:57.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev zerohalo (~zerohalo@2601:6:f80:224:38a2:127b:d045:41e8) |