| 00:25.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Gugge (gugge@kriminel.dk) |
| 02:03.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~Adium@200.55.209.165) |
| 02:03.12 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 02:08.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 02:12.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~Adium@200.55.209.165) |
| 02:12.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 07:52.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@85.183.61.47) |
| 08:50.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:4cfa:13b8:8ce:651d) |
| 08:55.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev zpotoloom (~quassel@tom.data.ee) |
| 10:12.47 | Stefan27 | coreyfarrell do you have any news of the tests you made which was related to my stress-test-caused mem-leak produced by ast_channel_snapshot_create? |
| 10:18.23 | coreyfarrell | Stefan27: stasis leak I found was caused by func_talkdetect |
| 10:19.12 | coreyfarrell | if you are using talk detection then it would help you, if not then it likely doesn't apply to your situation |
| 11:01.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 11:01.08 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Asterisk 13.0.0-beta2 now released. Do the (beta) release dance! -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 12:06.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 12:06.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 12:07.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev zpotoloom (~quassel@tom.data.ee) |
| 12:41.47 | Stefan27 | aha, thanks |
| 12:42.02 | Stefan27 | ill get back when i have more news |
| 12:42.15 | wdoekes | digiumguys: http://asterisk.org/ serves links that do not exist (e.g. http://asterisk.org/downloads ) |
| 13:14.34 | skrusty | who broke asterisk.org?! :) |
| 13:54.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216-191-106-163.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 14:05.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (uid27319@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-apleldalppfmhygo) |
| 14:14.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@23-228-175-118.mci.googlefiber.net) |
| 14:35.50 | file | cool |
| 14:36.05 | file | oh |
| 14:36.13 | file | goes to read something |
| 14:36.40 | file | malcolmd, actually can you file a service desk request for the above? ^^^ |
| 14:38.35 | file | huh |
| 14:38.42 | file | if you use www.asterisk.org it works fine |
| 14:39.07 | file | and I have found how to submit a request! #achievementunlocked |
| 14:40.38 | file | wdoekes / skrusty, ticket opened - thanks |
| 14:45.51 | skrusty | :) |
| 14:47.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 14:47.51 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 14:50.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (~newtonr@nat/digium/x-tpgfujrgepkzdasw) |
| 14:50.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 14:57.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-lspaymzedqtubyyw) |
| 14:57.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 14:57.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (~rmudgett@nat/digium/x-tbctsuwafvkptswb) |
| 15:01.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (~kharwell@nat/digium/x-xkunpphrexoyxcxm) |
| 15:02.17 | wdoekes | mjordan: corey asked you why the sip.conf files are in the pjsip testcases; I'm curious too. esp. since I pointed out the "missing" dependencies to chan_sip |
| 15:07.13 | mjordan | wdoekes: I haven't had a chance to check yet, but my suspicion is copy+pasta |
| 15:07.42 | mjordan | goes to do that now |
| 15:08.24 | mjordan | Hm. |
| 15:08.59 | mjordan | I'll go out on a limb and say I'm pretty sure that's the case. Using gateway_native_t38 as an example, there's no good reason to bind both PJSIP and chan_sip to the same address. That's just a recipe for madness. |
| 15:11.13 | file | same port, don't say bind to different addresses - that's a bad thing |
| 15:11.45 | mjordan | truth |
| 15:11.57 | mjordan | but in the case I just mentioned, they are both binding to 127.0.0.2:5060 |
| 15:12.18 | file | argh |
| 15:36.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 15:36.58 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- Asterisk 13.0.0-beta2 now released. Do the (beta) release dance! -=- Follow on Twitter at @AsteriskDev |
| 15:43.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@69.76.221.33) |
| 15:47.33 | wdoekes | coreyfarrell: ip route add local 127.0.0.2 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.2 |
| 15:47.40 | wdoekes | or something similar |
| 15:48.17 | WIMPy | That makes sense. |
| 15:48.43 | WIMPy | But you'd have to do that for every single IP. |
| 15:49.39 | coreyfarrell | using multiple loopback addresses is weird, needing to use a specific source loopback address is even weirder |
| 15:50.02 | wdoekes | I don't know if this is a generic thing or centos adds 127.0.0.2 |
| 15:50.13 | wdoekes | I don't use centos, so I can't check |
| 15:50.24 | WIMPy | agrees with coreyfarrell |
| 15:50.45 | coreyfarrell | 'ip route' on centos doesn't list any loopback routes.. |
| 15:50.59 | wdoekes | well, you have 2^24 of them, so why not use more than one ;) |
| 15:51.51 | wdoekes | debians used to use 127.0.1.1 for the hostname on multihomed systems |
| 15:53.12 | wdoekes | coreyfarrell: ip route show table local |
| 15:53.27 | WIMPy | Lots of wierd stuff. I can understand why some OSes use something like 127.0.0.2 as drop or reject targets. But this..? |
| 15:55.05 | coreyfarrell | wdoekes: ok that's weird, centos6 has: local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo proto kernel scope host src 127.0.0.1 |
| 15:56.07 | coreyfarrell | yet the testsuite tests/manager/acl-login worked on centos before we added the explicit source address bind, so connections to 127.0.0.2:5038 were using 127.0.0.2 as the source address |
| 16:33.22 | wdoekes | odd |
| 16:37.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgriepentrog (~sgriepent@nat/digium/x-nnkivmuozfmapsbb) |
| 17:03.57 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Sjors (~sgielen@2a01:4f8:202:63f2:f00::1) |
| 17:23.24 | leifmadsen | mjordan: psssst |
| 17:23.37 | leifmadsen | mjordan: curious if you're considering getting 1.8.32.0 out this week... ? |
| 17:24.24 | file | leifmadsen, yes. |
| 17:24.28 | leifmadsen | w00t :) |
| 17:24.43 | leifmadsen | I need to rebase some of our work on 1.8.last.0 and would like to do that this week if at all possible |
| 17:25.00 | leifmadsen | I know how it is getting back from astricon :) |
| 17:25.10 | mjordan | heh, yeah |
| 17:25.14 | file | AstriCon? that was soooooooo week...s ago |
| 17:25.25 | mjordan | plus coreyfarrell had that nasty memory leak in audio file playback, I was holding off for that |
| 17:25.42 | leifmadsen | ah gotcha |
| 17:25.43 | Marquis42 | That's probably a good thing to wait for. |
| 17:25.45 | leifmadsen | yes, no more memory leaks please :) |
| 17:25.46 | mjordan | There's a bit of hiccup with some infrastructure this morning (yayz), once I know that's not all mucked up I'll cut the RCs today |
| 17:25.57 | leifmadsen | mjordan: hawt, thx |
| 17:30.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev terryw (~otherwise@69.76.221.33) |
| 18:24.12 | mjordan | anyone have any last minute Shipped patches they want to get into 1.8 in a fashion that is almost doomed to ensure that we have to release a second RC? :-P |
| 18:25.23 | sgriepentrog | mjordan: not shipped yet, but r4139 is a candidate for 1.8 |
| 18:27.08 | mjordan | probably not worth pushing that in |
| 18:27.19 | sgriepentrog | can't argue that. |
| 18:27.26 | mjordan | we're about a week behind release dates that we should have hit, and that doesn't look to be super critical :-) |
| 18:28.00 | leifmadsen | ship it! |
| 18:28.01 | leifmadsen | :D |
| 18:45.51 | wdoekes | r4114 would be a good candidate |
| 18:50.26 | mjordan | alas, missed it :-P We could alway slip in an -rc2 if we really want it in |
| 18:51.57 | mjordan | as the last 1.8 release, if anyone does want an rc2 with a few last bug fixes this week, I'd be happy to roll it |
| 18:57.20 | coreyfarrell | mjordan: if you want r4114 in 1.8 would I commit to /branches/1.8 and let you merge into -rc2? |
| 18:59.08 | mjordan | yup |
| 20:16.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-fpgmfopghkljzmbm) |
| 20:19.26 | gtjoseph | file: got a minute for a sorcery_config load question? |
| 20:19.31 | file | yes |
| 20:20.34 | gtjoseph | in sorcery_config_internal_load if the sorcery_alloc suceeds but objset_apply fails, what's the cleanup path? |
| 20:21.06 | gtjoseph | it looks like an empty object is added to the container |
| 20:21.34 | file | if integrity is object level then the previously loaded object is added |
| 20:21.40 | file | if integrity is file leve then the entire process fails |
| 20:22.35 | gtjoseph | oh, duh. i was reading the if wrong |
| 20:22.54 | file | it's Monday after all |
| 20:34.50 | sgriepentrog | Has it always been necessary to mark a template with a (!) or did that just recently change? |
| 20:35.15 | leifmadsen | always |
| 20:35.18 | leifmadsen | sgriepentrog: ^^ |
| 20:36.09 | sgriepentrog | weird. stuff I had working before without (!) just stopped working until I fixed it. Maybe it was a requirement that wasn't 100% enforced in the code? Oh well. |
| 20:36.48 | leifmadsen | odd... not sure how else you would have defined a template ;) |
| 20:37.24 | sgriepentrog | Just declare it like a regular entry and then reference it in ()'s of another entry. |
| 20:37.46 | leifmadsen | ah, that may technically work, although the existing thing wouldn't be a true "template" I guess in the strictest sense |
| 20:38.54 | sgriepentrog | So according to https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Using+Templates this *was* supposed to be supported. Definately not now. |
| 21:15.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@23-228-175-118.mci.googlefiber.net) |
| 21:16.57 | malcolmd | file: one was filed |
| 21:17.26 | file | malcolmd, what? |
| 21:17.59 | malcolmd | asterisk.org/downloads |
| 21:18.05 | file | ah |
| 21:18.07 | malcolmd | just closing the loop :D |
| 21:20.26 | mjordan | yeah... apparently we didn't release 13.0.0 :-P |
| 21:20.46 | malcolmd | mjordan: ? |
| 21:20.47 | file | mjordan, I can feel it... being erased... from my memory |
| 21:20.58 | mjordan | malcolmd: go to the downloads page |
| 21:21.10 | mjordan | the working one, not the one that is a 404 |
| 21:21.10 | mjordan | http://www.asterisk.org/downloads |
| 21:21.29 | malcolmd | two shakes... |
| 21:21.35 | bklang | interestingly: asterisk.org laods fine. Click downloads -> asterisk.org/downloads 404 |
| 21:21.49 | bklang | www version is fine |
| 21:21.54 | file | bklang, yeah - known |
| 21:22.04 | bklang | ok |
| 21:22.21 | bklang | sorry, I guess I didn't read up far enough |
| 21:24.22 | mjordan | bklang: it's good times |
| 21:24.36 | mjordan | bklang: Apparently the website decided to take a vacation and took half its pages with it |
| 21:26.09 | bklang | Lucky you |
| 21:27.30 | file | finds what he was looking for |
| 21:31.19 | jsmith | file: "And I still.... haven't found.... what I'm looking for...." |
| 21:31.36 | jsmith | wonders if file will get the earworm... |
| 21:31.42 | file | ineffective |
| 21:45.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev terryw (~otherwise@23-228-175-118.mci.googlefiber.net) |
| 22:51.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev vlad_starkov (~vlad_star@91.206.59.50) |
| 23:04.42 | *** part/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-lspaymzedqtubyyw) |
| 23:42.11 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kharwell (~kharwell@nat/digium/x-xkunpphrexoyxcxm) |