| 00:35.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ipengineer (~zconkle@108-206-120-218.lightspeed.mckntx.sbcglobal.net) |
| 01:46.57 | tm1000 | pretty sure this is broken in 12 and 13: https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+12+ManagerEvent_ConfbridgeTalking |
| 02:59.31 | gtjoseph | tm1000: it's working for me in 12. what's the exact issue? |
| 02:59.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@115.42.183.114) |
| 03:35.13 | tm1000 | gtjoseph: I think im doing it completely wrong |
| 03:35.16 | tm1000 | like the setup |
| 03:35.34 | gtjoseph | are you even getting the events? |
| 03:35.39 | tm1000 | nope |
| 03:36.01 | tm1000 | gtjoseph: I put talk_detection_events=yes in confbridge.conf |
| 03:36.04 | tm1000 | restarted event |
| 03:36.13 | tm1000 | I have the âcallâ event assigned to the AMI user |
| 03:36.16 | gtjoseph | are you issuing the WaitEvent command |
| 03:36.52 | tm1000 | gtjoseph: no I have no need to do that |
| 03:36.57 | tm1000 | im writing this in node.js |
| 03:37.31 | tm1000 | gtjoseph: furthermore I get all other events and I meant all other events, I can even see RTPsent :-) |
| 03:37.32 | gtjoseph | gotcha, are you seeing the other Confbridge events? |
| 03:37.39 | tm1000 | gtjoseph: yes every single one |
| 03:37.39 | gtjoseph | ah |
| 03:37.40 | tm1000 | but talk |
| 03:37.46 | tm1000 | I seriously *know* its me |
| 03:37.55 | tm1000 | just canât figure out what im doing wrong |
| 03:37.55 | gtjoseph | let me look at my code. i just did this last week. |
| 03:38.11 | tm1000 | gtjoseph: is the event flag âcallâ in manager.conf? |
| 03:38.19 | gtjoseph | i'm checking |
| 03:40.04 | gtjoseph | i have 'all' so you may want to just try that and see if you get them. |
| 03:42.24 | tm1000 | gtjoseph: ok I will do tomorrow. spent too much time on it already :-) |
| 03:42.28 | tm1000 | but that might just do it |
| 03:42.38 | gtjoseph | i know what you mean |
| 05:48.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@115.42.183.114) |
| 06:06.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@85.183.61.47) |
| 06:22.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev babak (uid19622@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-dlxkkqxsjnvorbhw) |
| 06:59.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@85.183.61.47) |
| 07:00.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@119.234.15.53) |
| 07:35.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev michael_work (~michael-w@bzq-82-168-31-134.red.bezeqint.net) |
| 07:35.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-work (~snuffy@210.8.167.13) |
| 07:35.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-work] by ChanServ |
| 08:14.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~Adium@dab-crx1-h-2-4.dab.02.net) |
| 08:14.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 08:24.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wanna (~wanna@217.111.230.156) |
| 08:32.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:1c7a:3282:a5be:98c1) |
| 08:42.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 08:42.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 10:20.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Jacke (jacke@valhalla.bofh.org) |
| 10:25.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@cm244.epsilon47.maxonline.com.sg) |
| 11:00.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@85.183.61.47) |
| 11:29.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev X-Rob (sid14615@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-nmemiknvparjoxxo) |
| 12:14.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216-191-106-163.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 12:33.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 12:41.10 | *** part/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@85.183.61.47) |
| 13:08.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 13:18.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@053d9234.dynamic.tele-ag.de) |
| 13:27.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 13:27.22 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 13:27.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dovid (~Dovid@static-173-63-105-210.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net) |
| 13:28.05 | Dovid | I am trying to run this patch against Asterisk-1.8.22.0. How do I figure out why it wouldn't work? http://pastebin.com/fKNZftqg |
| 13:29.53 | Qwell | Dovid: Manual comparison of failed chunks. |
| 13:35.46 | Dovid | Qwell: Why would it fail? Because it does not know where to put the code? |
| 13:35.56 | Qwell | yes |
| 13:38.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@cm244.epsilon47.maxonline.com.sg) |
| 13:39.29 | Dovid | How do I know what to manually patch? Looking at my pb what lines tell me where i need to look. lin3 #12 sats hunk # failed @ 156. Does that mean 156 in my file? |
| 13:42.45 | seanbright | Dovid: maybe you could try generating the patch against 1.8.22.0 instead of 1.8 HEAD? |
| 13:43.24 | seanbright | Dovid: svn diff http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/tags/1.8.22.0/ http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/oej/darjeeling-prack-1.8 > prack.patch |
| 13:43.56 | Dovid | SeanBright: Thanks. Not sure why I didnt think of that |
| 13:44.26 | seanbright | it's early |
| 13:45.30 | Dovid | Seanbright: tell me about it...... I was out fighting a fire till 1:00 AM |
| 13:51.32 | Dovid | Does anyone know why this isnt compiling? pastebin.com/pL9zWDw0 |
| 13:52.49 | Dovid | This is after I patched my Asterisk |
| 13:56.47 | seanbright | did you re-run configure? |
| 13:56.54 | seanbright | i would: |
| 13:57.12 | seanbright | ./bootstrap ; ./configure ; make distclean ; ./configure |
| 13:57.31 | seanbright | Dovid: ^^^ |
| 13:57.41 | Dovid | seanbright: i did configure i will do bootstrap and see |
| 13:58.24 | Dovid | seanbright: What does bootstrap do? |
| 13:58.35 | seanbright | rebuilds the configure script |
| 13:58.40 | seanbright | using autoconf magic |
| 14:00.56 | Dovid | seabright: That didn't do it. I guess I need to wait for OEJ? |
| 14:04.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@189.36.172.2) |
| 14:04.41 | seanbright | the more i think about it, the patch is probably wrong |
| 14:06.28 | Dovid | seanbright: Thanks. I will wait for Oej |
| 14:06.34 | seanbright | i'm assuming you can't update asterisk |
| 14:06.43 | seanbright | 1.8.22 is 1 1/2 years old |
| 14:10.11 | Dovid | seanbright: We are happy in 1.8.X land. When we went past 1.8.22.0 we had problems where calls would randomly disapear from asterisk with no BYE. The remote side would send a BYE and asterisk would send 481 i believe so we went back to 1.8.22.0 which works the best for us |
| 14:11.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-yupmlzodkgczusfm) |
| 14:11.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 14:18.28 | Dovid | seanbright: as per OEJ something changed in canary and his code does not touch that |
| 14:21.17 | mjordan | astcanary? |
| 14:22.02 | Dovid | yes. that is where its failing |
| 14:22.17 | Dovid | http://pastebin.com/pL9zWDw0 |
| 14:23.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev JunK-Y (~junky@pdpc/supporter/active/junk-y) |
| 14:24.42 | leifmadsen | seanbright: live on the edge.. we're still patching 1.8.18.0 |
| 14:25.03 | jsmith | leifmadsen: Yikes! |
| 14:25.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (~kharwell@nat/digium/x-jdmgtulleyleymux) |
| 14:26.11 | *** part/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@053d9234.dynamic.tele-ag.de) |
| 14:26.21 | leifmadsen | jsmith: yea :( however our next 2 zone builds will use 1.8.28.0 |
| 14:26.27 | leifmadsen | and then we'll backfill everyone to 1.8.28.0 |
| 14:26.58 | leifmadsen | then in another quarter will rebase on whatever the newest 1.8.x is |
| 14:27.05 | leifmadsen | which by then will probably be the last one right? EOL soon? |
| 14:27.10 | Dovid | leifmadsen: Oooooh. Can i have your patches? |
| 14:27.15 | leifmadsen | Dovid: no? |
| 14:27.38 | Dovid | if ur backporting to 1.8.18.0 i can get all the fixes with out going forward. |
| 14:27.47 | leifmadsen | that's not what I meant |
| 14:27.52 | leifmadsen | that also makes zero sense |
| 14:28.02 | leifmadsen | if you backported all of 1.8.28.0 you'd just have... 1.8.28.0 |
| 14:28.20 | leifmadsen | we have select backports and custom changes |
| 14:28.41 | jsmith | Right... the telling question is -- what happened between 1.8.18.0 and 1.8.28.0 that you *don't* want? |
| 14:28.46 | mjordan | leifmadsen: 1.8 goes into security fix only in october |
| 14:28.50 | leifmadsen | jsmith: that's for customers to find out for me |
| 14:28.51 | mjordan | I'd expect two more releases or so |
| 14:28.56 | leifmadsen | mjordan: cool thanks |
| 14:29.01 | leifmadsen | was just looking it up on the wiki |
| 14:29.02 | mjordan | leifmadsen: the open source way :-P |
| 14:29.18 | leifmadsen | mjordan: indeed :) |
| 14:29.25 | leifmadsen | now if only it was in git so I could just type git rebase :D |
| 14:29.27 | leifmadsen | ducks |
| 14:29.41 | mjordan | we're trying man, we're trying :-) |
| 14:29.53 | jsmith | leifmadsen: I think we should have a "get into git" mugging party at AstriCon |
| 14:30.09 | jsmith | Mug the people responsible, hold them hostage in a room, and don't let them out until it's done :-p |
| 14:30.22 | Marquis42 | I approve :) |
| 14:30.28 | leifmadsen | jsmith: I'll bring the muscle |
| 14:30.32 | jsmith | Marquis42: OK, you're Bouncer #1 |
| 14:30.35 | Marquis42 | :D |
| 14:30.38 | leifmadsen | see? |
| 14:30.39 | jsmith | leifmadsen: But you're too skinny to be a bouncer! |
| 14:30.39 | leifmadsen | my work here is done |
| 14:30.45 | leifmadsen | jsmith: oh I meant you and Marquis42 |
| 14:30.54 | jsmith | leifmadsen: You know I'm tougher than you :-p |
| 14:30.56 | leifmadsen | I'm just the brain of MasterBlaster |
| 14:31.01 | leifmadsen | jsmith: ikr? |
| 14:40.45 | mjordan | jsmith: I might approve that |
| 14:40.51 | mjordan | knows he is probably a hostage |
| 14:41.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (~newtonr@nat/digium/x-aafvstpduxhdzgit) |
| 14:41.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 14:41.07 | jsmith | What can I bring to help "grease the wheels", so to speak? |
| 14:41.37 | jsmith | still isn't sure he's going to be able to attend AstriCon, but he's planning anyway |
| 14:41.56 | mjordan | blech, that would suck if you couldn't |
| 14:42.06 | mjordan | But! The biggest problem is just figuring out all the implications. |
| 14:42.19 | mjordan | Things like releases, private repos, team branches, review tools, etc. |
| 14:42.29 | mjordan | We've started looking at it |
| 14:42.36 | jsmith | Private repos are easy -- you keep them to yourself :-p |
| 14:42.44 | mjordan | But nothing to throw up for discussion just yet. I don't think I want to do another full standard release without moving to git however |
| 14:42.56 | jsmith | team branches are just branches, and branches are easy in git |
| 14:43.05 | mjordan | jsmith: yup. There are some tools in some things that prevent pushes which are nice |
| 14:43.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 14:43.56 | mjordan | and figuring out a merge policy |
| 14:43.58 | mjordan | and more fun. |
| 14:44.15 | mjordan | Some folks are a fan of the "Linus" model, others are more in favor of what we have today |
| 14:44.45 | Marquis42 | Linus model as in "One committer to rule them all"? |
| 14:45.10 | mjordan | well, one committer to trunk. Or a few. Or possibly more to specific branches. |
| 14:45.17 | Marquis42 | Right |
| 14:45.23 | Marquis42 | That's what I meant in my snarkiness. :) |
| 14:45.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@cm244.epsilon47.maxonline.com.sg) |
| 14:46.37 | Marquis42 | I don't hate that idea, mostly because I think the folk(s) that would end up in that position is/are pretty reasonable, but it seems like it would put additional time pressures on those people where they don't necessarily have a lot of free time as it is. |
| 14:50.27 | coreyfarrell | do you know what you plan to use for the git server? IE gitolite or something else? also I'm not a fan of the Linus model |
| 14:51.17 | jameswf | I think a good practice is to develop in branches then have someone merge back. Or sync with github, allow people to clone in to their own accounts and submit pull requests |
| 14:52.01 | jameswf | s/clone/fork/ |
| 14:53.27 | mjordan | no decisions have been made on anything |
| 14:53.47 | leifmadsen | mjordan: I can definitely help in the discussion around release process |
| 14:53.47 | leifmadsen | because that's what I do now with git and our releases |
| 14:53.56 | mjordan | we're looking at some stuff, when we have some options we'll e-mail folks |
| 14:54.05 | mjordan | right now I don't think we know enough to even have a good opinion |
| 14:54.07 | mjordan | :-) |
| 14:54.21 | file | and this is not something to dive into lightly |
| 14:54.29 | leifmadsen | sure, I just mean I can help discuss what *we* do at AstriCon because having absolutely nothing to go on is often harder than at least having something that you hate :) |
| 14:54.43 | jameswf | tm1000: and GameGamer43 are good resources too.. they are git ninjas |
| 14:54.57 | leifmadsen | gerrit can help with a lot of the permissions stuff and such as well |
| 14:55.22 | leifmadsen | anyways, anything I can do to help encourage and promote moving to git is the approach I'm going to take |
| 14:55.32 | leifmadsen | I know you guys are sick of hearing about moving to git |
| 14:55.37 | file | I'm very sick of it. :P |
| 14:55.46 | leifmadsen | I know this :) |
| 14:56.20 | leifmadsen | but it would make contributing code significantly easier, and the maintenance of patches and keeping things up to date etc etc are much reduced in a git environment |
| 14:56.51 | file | yes, we know this |
| 14:56.55 | file | I know this |
| 14:59.02 | jameswf | file: you guys should move to git |
| 14:59.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Marquis42 (~mrbmw@d149-67-95-208.try.wideopenwest.com) |
| 14:59.21 | file | glares |
| 14:59.39 | Qwell | am I too late to say how awesome mercurial is? |
| 14:59.42 | Qwell | we should use that |
| 14:59.47 | Marquis42 | lol |
| 14:59.58 | jameswf | Astricon session... Why you guys should git.. lead by leifmadsen |
| 15:00.08 | file | Facebook uses it as git could not scale to how they needed it |
| 15:00.51 | file | and it was easier for them to extend and improve |
| 15:01.06 | file | (just for those who might troll on mercurial) |
| 15:01.12 | Marquis42 | heh |
| 15:01.34 | leifmadsen | Digium also isn't Facebook :) |
| 15:02.01 | file | I never said we should use mercurial - just that it is in use by an extremely large company with good results |
| 15:02.03 | file | :P |
| 15:03.58 | jameswf | svn is/was in use by many companies with good results.... past performance is not always a good metric of future need |
| 15:04.26 | Dovid | seanbright: I created a patch for each file and patched again. Now I get: http://pastebin.com/Mq1RAGxL. I am not looking fo rthe answer but how to figure out how to fix such an issue (so I can learn). |
| 15:09.40 | seanbright | Dovid: ok, i am a wonderful person and have patched 1.8.22.0 for you |
| 15:10.35 | Dovid | seanbright: Thank you. where can I get it? |
| 15:10.36 | Dovid | i am able to patch now but i cant build |
| 15:11.10 | seanbright | http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=8KBCBFLp |
| 15:11.27 | seanbright | that should apply cleanly to a fresh unpack of 1.8.22.0 |
| 15:11.39 | seanbright | i haven't tried building it |
| 15:12.11 | Dovid | seanbright: THanks. I will try to build |
| 15:12.28 | Dovid | what did you do to create that patch? |
| 15:12.31 | Dovid | (so I can learn for next time) |
| 15:12.40 | Qwell | <Qwell> Dovid: Manual comparison of failed chunks. |
| 15:15.20 | seanbright | Dovid: what Qwell said |
| 15:15.29 | Qwell | twice. |
| 15:15.41 | Dovid | i was lazy and did the up keay. I should have asked Qwell |
| 15:16.53 | Dovid | nm. you were the one that did it for me. like i said before. not a lot of sleep. it passed bulding chan_sip.so |
| 15:17.45 | seanbright | good times |
| 15:17.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Gugge (gugge@kriminel.dk) |
| 15:17.53 | seanbright | goes back to productive things |
| 15:17.55 | jameswf | sets chan_sip on fire.... solves problem |
| 15:18.04 | Dovid | Thank you guys. |
| 15:18.08 | Dovid | jameswf: :) |
| 15:18.19 | Dovid | Beer is on me @ Astricon |
| 15:18.23 | seanbright | yeah... i don't think you really appreciate how ugly chan_sip is until you've used res_pjsip |
| 15:18.35 | seanbright | i'd rather drink it out of a glass |
| 15:18.42 | seanbright | but whatever floats your boat |
| 15:18.59 | Dovid | seanbright: last I looked at docs for res_pjsip there were a lot of features in chan_sip that it didnt have |
| 15:19.00 | file | seanbright, the best thing is that between putnopvut and myself... we can probably know exactly what is going on in it |
| 15:19.15 | file | knowledge is power! |
| 15:19.15 | Dovid | seanbright: drink it however you like, it's on me |
| 15:19.28 | Qwell | seanbright: sounds like you've been challenged |
| 15:19.47 | jameswf | at Astricon Dovid body shots #yolo |
| 15:19.56 | file | Dovid, do you have some examples of what isn't there? |
| 15:20.21 | putnopvut | It doesn't send requests to the wrong destination as often. |
| 15:20.33 | Dovid | file: I dont remember. I remember hearing it @ Astricon last year or seeing it in the docs. I saw it sme where. this was when 12.0.0 was released |
| 15:20.37 | Dovid | i never had time after that to look |
| 15:20.52 | file | the 12 release allowed features to be added afterwards |
| 15:21.17 | Dovid | file: Ok so > 12.0.0 it was caught up? |
| 15:21.43 | file | caught up is relative to the features you require, it doesn't have obscure stuff (for example CCSS) |
| 15:21.59 | file | but it is a viable solution for many people, companies, scenarios, etc |
| 15:22.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Marquis42 (~mrbmw@d149-67-95-208.try.wideopenwest.com) |
| 15:24.28 | Dovid | ok. I will have another stab at it |
| 15:24.52 | mjordan | Dovid: if you do run into a feature that isn't there, do mention it. We do pay attention :-) |
| 15:25.07 | mjordan | CCSS didn't make it in because when we looked at it, not many folks used it. |
| 15:25.10 | file | unless it's CCSS |
| 15:25.30 | mjordan | we could do CCSS much easier now.... but only 5 people would probably care |
| 15:25.36 | Dovid | mjordan: I dont contribute much to dev. and i dont like pestering too much. i take what you will offer but i dont want bother ev1 here |
| 15:25.50 | file | putnopvut, you can do it this weekend - right? |
| 15:25.55 | mjordan | Dovid: progress updates are useful, which isn't the same thing as pestering :-) |
| 15:26.01 | Qwell | Dovid: If everybody took that approach, no features would ever be added. |
| 15:26.11 | putnopvut | file: yeah totally |
| 15:26.17 | mjordan | "Hey, things went pretty well except for this one thing, I could use that. Thanks!" is not the same as "Go write me some code now" |
| 15:26.42 | Dovid | Qwell: Yes but I get a lot of help here when needed, I got a finger I wont try to get a hand. |
| 15:26.47 | mjordan | The former is totally appreciated. It helps to know what people use and what they need. |
| 15:26.50 | Dovid | but if I find something I will mention it here |
| 15:26.54 | mjordan | thanks! |
| 15:27.39 | Dovid | thanks for all the help guys. now it's time to test prack |
| 15:28.13 | seanbright | i'm sure it's fine |
| 15:43.46 | jsmith | mjordan, leifmadsen: FYI, here's the formal request to get pjproject 2.3 packaged for Fedora/RHEL/CentOS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140324 |
| 15:43.56 | leifmadsen | jsmith: w00t :) |
| 15:46.11 | mjordan | that's awesome news |
| 15:46.55 | seanbright | back in my day, you had to compile everything by hand |
| 15:47.28 | Marquis42 | jsmith: Nice moves! |
| 15:48.50 | leifmadsen | where is my vote up button? |
| 15:48.50 | leifmadsen | :D |
| 17:22.02 | seanbright | man... committing something to the asterisk repository is a good way to get spammed |
| 17:22.17 | seanbright | oh. well i can turn them off, NEVERMIND. |
| 17:54.21 | mjordan | rmudgett: playing around with holding bridges some more in ARI. Since you can't have two Announcer channels in a holding bridge, in order to do a playback into a holding bridge that has MoH started on it, you currently have to stop MoH |
| 17:54.38 | mjordan | rmudgett: Unfortunately, when you re-start it, it creates a new announcer channel and restarts MoH from the very beginning |
| 17:55.59 | mjordan | I wonder if we shouldn't be holding onto that MoH channel, so that a subsequent start re-uses it |
| 18:02.04 | mjordan | either that, or we should have a 'pause' option. |
| 18:02.06 | mjordan | is unsure. |
| 18:02.22 | file | hum |
| 18:02.45 | mjordan | I don't like pause. |
| 18:02.56 | mjordan | Because the "right" way would be to return a control object from the start operation |
| 18:03.01 | mjordan | and that starts to break the API a lot. |
| 18:03.16 | mjordan | If I stop and then start again, I'd probably just expect it to "work" like it does for channels |
| 18:04.57 | mjordan | this is actually pretty easy to fix. A stasis_app_bridges_stop_moh should just remove the channel from the bridge, but keep the channel active (it should probably stop MoH on the channel too, just so we aren't wasting cycles and frames) |
| 18:05.17 | mjordan | When you delete a bridge, it should call into the app, see if it has a moh_wrapper associated with it, and hang up the channel if it does |
| 18:05.39 | mjordan | But I'm open to suggestions on whether or not restarting MoH every time is desireable |
| 18:05.51 | mjordan | goes to get some coffee |
| 18:08.30 | jsmith | mjordan: I wouldn't want MoH restarted each time, personally |
| 18:09.02 | mjordan | me neither. |
| 18:09.06 | mjordan | My example app is really annoying me. |
| 18:09.13 | jsmith | But then again, I personally wouldn't be opposed to allowing both an "Announcer" channel and a "MusicAnnouncer" channel on the bridge |
| 18:09.23 | jsmith | ... and pausing the MusicAnnouncer while the Announcer is talking :-p |
| 18:09.31 | mjordan | Yeah, right now we don't multi-mix the announcers |
| 18:09.39 | jsmith | You wouldn't have to mix them |
| 18:09.41 | mjordan | ah, you mean pausing the MoH while the playback goes |
| 18:09.44 | jsmith | Yeah... |
| 18:09.46 | mjordan | that would be 'nice' of us |
| 18:09.51 | jsmith | It sure would.... |
| 18:10.20 | jsmith | ... I'm sure that makes the code more complicated |
| 18:10.21 | mjordan | and pretty doable. I'm not sure if there are any drawbacks. |
| 18:10.32 | mjordan | nah, not that bad. |
| 18:10.49 | jsmith | I can't think of any drawbacks off the top of my head |
| 18:10.53 | mjordan | We already cache the MoH channel so we can re-use it |
| 18:11.02 | mjordan | It would mean that a stop is just a stop, which is kind of nice as well. The whole restart just applies if you do an operation that interrupts it |
| 18:11.10 | jsmith | Right... |
| 18:11.27 | mjordan | I'll play around with it and probably file an issue once I understand the implications a bit better. |
| 18:11.37 | mjordan | The benefit of writing sample apps is that you run into these kinds of things :-) |
| 18:11.54 | jsmith | wishes he could just write sample apps all day :-p |
| 18:12.06 | mjordan | me too! |
| 18:12.06 | mjordan | I have today. |
| 18:12.20 | mjordan | enjoys ignoring the inbox |
| 18:15.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev coreyfarrell (~coreyfarr@2001:4830:117f:2:7cc1:d4e4:6e1f:4fec) |
| 18:17.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216-191-106-163.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 19:07.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev russellb (~russellb@redhat/russellb) |
| 19:07.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
| 19:28.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev file (~file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) |
| 19:28.18 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o file] by ChanServ |
| 19:37.09 | tm1000 | mjordan: ping |
| 19:40.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bulkorok (~Benjamin@053d9234.dynamic.tele-ag.de) |
| 19:41.40 | mjordan | tm1000: pong |
| 19:42.07 | tm1000 | mjordan: talker detect for confbridge, what is the AMI permission I need |
| 19:42.41 | tm1000 | I tried call but doesnt seem to pass., last night I was told to use âallâ so might just do that |
| 19:43.43 | mjordan | looks |
| 19:44.18 | mjordan | hum. Documentation says "call" |
| 19:44.20 | mjordan | https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+13+ManagerEvent_ConfbridgeTalking |
| 19:44.28 | mjordan | do you have the events enabled in confbridge.conf? |
| 19:44.30 | tm1000 | yeah I couldnt get it to pass |
| 19:44.46 | tm1000 | yeah but I didnt figure that out till I found your SO response |
| 19:44.55 | tm1000 | it might be hjelpful to have that in the above wiki^ |
| 19:45.16 | tm1000 | in fact |
| 19:45.21 | tm1000 | you should look at the article you sent me |
| 19:45.24 | tm1000 | its completely wrong |
| 19:45.25 | tm1000 | :-p |
| 19:45.29 | mjordan | Yeah, right now it is just in the configuration documentation. I don't think we've got a 'see-also' link to a config object yet |
| 19:45.32 | tm1000 | mjordan: Itâs talking about âmute" |
| 19:45.37 | mjordan | lawl |
| 19:45.51 | mjordan | somebody copy+pasta'd wrong |
| 19:46.01 | mjordan | makes a note to fix that |
| 19:46.18 | tm1000 | :-) |
| 19:46.25 | tm1000 | Ill play with it later. IM sure it works. Its just me |
| 19:46.26 | mjordan | I *think* that should be it. How many participants do you have in the conference? |
| 19:46.31 | tm1000 | I had two |
| 19:46.35 | tm1000 | I was yelling into one |
| 19:46.37 | mjordan | that should be enough |
| 19:46.44 | tm1000 | I even subâd to ALL events |
| 19:46.54 | tm1000 | and I saw RTPsent etc but never talk |
| 19:47.34 | mjordan | hm. |
| 19:47.41 | mjordan | that's disconcerting. Give me just a second. |
| 19:48.02 | Qwell | does confbridge show user profile show talk detect enabled? |
| 19:48.11 | putnopvut | I'm having a bit of an ari-py issue while attempting to stop a live playback. I have the following script: http://ur1.ca/i66d8 . It's intended to allow a caller to record and press '*' to cancel the recording or '#' to stop the recording. I call in and press '#' and I get this: http://ur1.ca/i66dd . I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here. |
| 19:48.52 | tm1000 | mjordan: http://pastebin.com/Mwgu8AeU |
| 19:49.03 | tm1000 | Qwell: oooooo nifty command |
| 19:49.04 | tm1000 | checking |
| 19:49.53 | tm1000 | Qwell: âTalk Detect Events: enabled" |
| 19:51.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 19:51.24 | mjordan | tm1000: |
| 19:51.31 | mjordan | http://pastebin.com/vkhfb38S |
| 19:52.51 | tm1000 | grrrrr |
| 19:53.48 | opticron | putnopvut, so it blows up when trying to stop a recording that hasn't yet been started? |
| 19:54.12 | mjordan | tm1000: I'll try with 11 real quick |
| 19:54.25 | putnopvut | opticron: nah, it's started. |
| 19:54.59 | opticron | have you checked to see why asterisk is reporting a 404 for that recording name? |
| 19:55.14 | opticron | maybe the URI encoding isn't being applied correctly? |
| 19:55.32 | putnopvut | I added a debug to the recordings container's cmp callback, but that debug never prints. Makes me think stuff is going badly earlier. |
| 19:55.40 | mjordan | ew, I have to load chan_sip |
| 19:56.13 | opticron | do you have a tcpdump of the exchange up? |
| 19:56.24 | putnopvut | opticron: nah, I suppose I can get that though. |
| 19:57.07 | tm1000 | im on 13 |
| 19:57.10 | tm1000 | still not working |
| 19:57.15 | tm1000 | I get all other events BUT that |
| 19:57.30 | mjordan | how is your channel joining the conference? |
| 19:57.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 19:59.11 | putnopvut | heh, doing tcpdump is getting all sorts of garbage characters, but I think I got the gist of it though. About to PB |
| 19:59.51 | putnopvut | opticron: tcpdump of the HTTP request/response: http://ur1.ca/i66fp |
| 20:00.04 | putnopvut | I think it may have something to do with the resource in the request...maybe. |
| 20:00.37 | putnopvut | Probably is not parsing the recording name like it should. |
| 20:01.05 | tm1000 | mjordan: yuck this is gross old code |
| 20:01.31 | tm1000 | mjordan: dial 4000 which is a goto to exten => STARTMEETME,n,ConfBridge(${MEETME_ROOMNUM},,,${MENU_PROFILE}) |
| 20:01.36 | mjordan | putnopvut: I wonder if it is because you have both a 302 and the specific file |
| 20:01.43 | mjordan | ah |
| 20:01.50 | mjordan | tm1000: what is the name of your user profile in confbridge.conf? |
| 20:02.31 | tm1000 | mjordan: im not 100% certain what its using at the user profile |
| 20:03.08 | mjordan | what does 'confbridge show profile users' spit out? |
| 20:03.35 | tm1000 | mjordan: its default_user |
| 20:03.41 | tm1000 | as the other ones are for paging |
| 20:04.05 | tm1000 | when I do âconfbridge show profile user default_userâ |
| 20:04.08 | mjordan | hm. Interesting. That should get picked up then. As an FYI, that's what I'm using as well, and it is getting applied to the user. |
| 20:04.09 | tm1000 | it shows talker is enabled |
| 20:04.16 | mjordan | Do you have any CONFBRIDGE function usage prior to going into ConfBridge? |
| 20:04.22 | tm1000 | yes |
| 20:04.27 | tm1000 | there are options set on the dialplan |
| 20:04.34 | mjordan | what's the dialplan leading up to that part? |
| 20:04.35 | tm1000 | but nothing related to talker, unless it gets reset |
| 20:04.49 | mjordan | well, it may not matter. default_user isn't used unless you don't specify anything else. |
| 20:05.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 20:05.28 | tm1000 | mjordan: http://pastebin.com/Nr6C0e07 |
| 20:05.46 | mjordan | yeah |
| 20:05.53 | tm1000 | my next step was just forcing it through dialplan |
| 20:06.04 | mjordan | prepend that with "exten => 4000,n,Set(CONFBRIDGE(user,template)=default_user) |
| 20:06.06 | putnopvut | Ha, I switched the recording name to just "voicemail" instead of "voicemail/{mailbox}/{timestamp}" and everything works now. Looks like ARI needs some tweakin' |
| 20:06.10 | tm1000 | im assuming your âyeahâ means I have to do that |
| 20:06.14 | mjordan | putnopvut: Yup |
| 20:06.35 | mjordan | tm1000: when you construct a user profile dynamically, it won't use anything from confbridge.conf unless you tell it to use a profile as a template |
| 20:07.03 | mjordan | otherwise, it just assumes you want whatever magic you just applied, and it will only use that |
| 20:07.07 | tm1000 | mjordan: Well I could do it there, or I could push talker there. or on confbridge() I could force it there |
| 20:07.12 | mjordan | yup |
| 20:07.13 | tm1000 | so many options to choose from now :-) |
| 20:07.19 | opticron | putnopvut, yeah, I figured that it it wasn't escaping the slashes properly |
| 20:07.23 | tm1000 | mjordan: thanks for your help!! |
| 20:07.25 | mjordan | np |
| 20:07.43 | mjordan | MOAR SAMPLE APPS |
| 20:08.28 | mjordan | putnopvut: btw, my philosophy here is that if we find something that is relatively easy to fix, we fix it. If it looks like it's a mine field, then file an issue :-) |
| 20:08.43 | opticron | putnopvut, the client lib is supposed to URI-encode all path parameters and of course asterisk won't get the right information if it's not formatted properly |
| 20:09.00 | putnopvut | okery-dokery |
| 20:09.09 | mjordan | ponders |
| 20:09.47 | opticron | for things that don't include slashes, it works just fine either way |
| 20:10.01 | opticron | sounds absolutely need the URI encoding because lots of them contain slashes |
| 20:10.38 | mjordan | well.. |
| 20:10.58 | mjordan | except that the fact that this whole thing turns into a path on the file system is kind of an artifact of us letting the user do that in the first place |
| 20:11.49 | mjordan | at the same time, the HTTP layer is going to have lots of fun getting mad at having infinitely nestable resources, so unless we require URI encoding of the 'path', it would suck |
| 20:11.50 | mjordan | a lot |
| 20:28.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 20:46.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 20:50.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@64.235.216.2) |
| 20:52.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 20:53.33 | tm1000 | mjordan: !! works great btw |
| 20:53.41 | mjordan | awesome |
| 20:53.43 | mjordan | good to hear :-) |
| 20:55.51 | tm1000 | mjordan: file so at what point did you guys realize that youâd both turn into httpd developers :-p |
| 20:56.26 | file | hum |
| 20:56.44 | file | I just play one on TV. |
| 20:57.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 20:59.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 21:00.37 | putnopvut | opticron: mjordan: I have a swagger-py patch that fixes the issue I was having. I suppose I'll throw a pull-request up. |
| 21:00.57 | mjordan | putnopvut: yeah, probably worth it. Did you use urllib.urlencode? |
| 21:01.05 | putnopvut | urllib.quote_plus() |
| 21:01.15 | mjordan | worksforme |
| 21:01.19 | putnopvut | Specifically for params passed to swagger that are of type "path" |
| 21:02.00 | putnopvut | Now to exercise my (lack of) git-fu to create this pull request. |
| 21:04.03 | mjordan | If it becomes a git-pile-o-poo, I'd say push it in |
| 21:04.06 | mjordan | but that's just me :-P |
| 21:04.39 | putnopvut | I don't have sufficient permission to push it in. |
| 21:04.49 | mjordan | well, that solves that then |
| 21:09.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-218-28-58.cablep.bezeqint.net) |
| 21:09.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 21:12.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 21:14.11 | putnopvut | So to make a pull request on github, I'm supposed to first push changes from a branch of mine, and then I can create the pull request on github, correct? I created a branch called url_encode, committed my changes there and attempted 'git push origin url_encode' but I'm getting denied permission to do so. |
| 21:14.22 | putnopvut | Do I have the process incorrect? Or the push command incorrect? |
| 21:14.27 | putnopvut | Or something else entirely? |
| 21:17.04 | mjordan | putnopvut: I fork the project, push my changes to my fork, then make a pull request |
| 21:17.15 | putnopvut | Gotcha, so my fork has to be on my own space on github. |
| 21:17.17 | mjordan | is very much a git green-belt |
| 21:19.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 21:25.29 | seanbright | that is correct. fork, clone, branch, commit, push, create PR |
| 21:30.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ipengineer (~zconkle@static-71-252-134-63.dllstx.fios.verizon.net) |
| 21:30.08 | opticron | putnopvut, if it's something like a one-liner change, github can also let you "edit in-line" to create a pull request |
| 21:30.27 | putnopvut | ah neat. |
| 21:30.31 | opticron | yeah |
| 21:30.37 | putnopvut | I've already done the personal fork thing now, though :( |
| 21:30.49 | opticron | in general, that is the correct way to do it |
| 21:30.49 | putnopvut | I'm just testing it and finding Asterisk to be uncooperative now, whereas before it was working great. |
| 21:31.28 | putnopvut | ...and now after adding a log notice, it's working again. |
| 21:31.33 | putnopvut | wtf. |
| 21:32.36 | mjordan | is now worried. |
| 21:32.46 | mjordan | who writes this crap anyway |
| 21:33.47 | putnopvut | yeah, it seems to alternately work and not work. It seems like for some reason, sometimes the recording gets unlinked from the container before the command to stop the recording is processed. |
| 21:34.01 | putnopvut | Other times, it works just fine. |
| 21:34.22 | mjordan | er |
| 21:34.26 | mjordan | es no bueno |
| 21:35.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 21:48.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 21:56.20 | putnopvut | UGGGGGHHH I've figured it out, and I don't like it. |
| 21:57.22 | putnopvut | Recording on a channel lets you specify a DTMF key that will stop the recording. I specified no DTMF. This causes res_stasis_recording to call ast_play_and_record_full() with acceptdtmf equal to "" |
| 21:57.55 | putnopvut | ast_play_and_record_full() is "helpful" enough to substitute a default acceptdtmf of "#" since we specified nothing for ourselves. |
| 21:58.38 | putnopvut | This means there's a race condition between ast_play_and_record_full(), which exits and unlinks the recording when it detects a '#' and my ARI app, which attempts to maniplate the recording itself when it gets a '#' |
| 21:58.45 | file | ew |
| 21:59.02 | putnopvut | Yeah, "ew" |
| 21:59.23 | putnopvut | So the problem has nothing to do with my swagger-py patch and everything to do with undocumented behavior in old-ass Asterisk APIs. |
| 22:02.42 | putnopvut | And now my pull request is open for whoever feels like merging it. |
| 22:04.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 22:38.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |
| 22:55.42 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kharwell (~kharwell@nat/digium/x-jdmgtulleyleymux) |
| 23:02.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev drmessano (~nonya@pdpc/supporter/active/drmessano) |