| 00:27.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev serafie (~erin@24.96.64.240) |
| 01:56.24 | coreyfarrell | file: not sure if you're around, I'm confused about frame.subclass.format - should this hold a reference? some of the updated code uses ast_format_copy, other code just does frame.subclass.format = ast_format_ulaw |
| 03:06.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@cm244.epsilon47.maxonline.com.sg) |
| 03:09.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@cm244.epsilon47.maxonline.com.sg) |
| 03:16.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@23-228-175-118.mci.googlefiber.net) |
| 04:34.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@23-228-175-118.mci.googlefiber.net) |
| 06:33.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:2d47:e4c2:eb8:edf5) |
| 07:20.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@cm244.epsilon47.maxonline.com.sg) |
| 07:22.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-work (~snuffy@210.8.167.13) |
| 07:22.26 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-work] by ChanServ |
| 08:00.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~dan@cpc11-folk2-2-0-cust171.1-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 08:07.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~Adium@62.28.178.18) |
| 08:07.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 08:15.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev X-Rob (sid14615@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-qxyayoaweusigfet) |
| 08:19.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev michael_work (~michael@bzq-82-168-31-134.red.bezeqint.net) |
| 08:34.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 08:34.43 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 08:39.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~dan@cpc11-folk2-2-0-cust171.1-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 10:23.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins_ (~dan@cpc11-folk2-2-0-cust171.1-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 10:28.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins_ (~dan@nat/digium/x-ahztgdddzrhegqxt) |
| 11:13.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev HeN_ (uid3747@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-shtvgyhrysniyvpx) |
| 11:15.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev vlad_starkov (~vlad_star@91.206.59.50) |
| 11:20.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 11:20.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 11:39.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev opticron (~opticron@pianoben.ch) |
| 11:39.52 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o opticron] by ChanServ |
| 11:41.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins (~dan@nat/digium/x-fcmdylknvfcvihpf) |
| 12:17.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@216-191-106-163.dedicated.allstream.net) |
| 12:41.22 | file | coreyfarrell, at that time I was unconscious |
| 12:56.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev SGjunior (~sgjunior@out-pq-224.wireless.telus.com) |
| 13:21.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev serafie (~erin@24.96.64.240) |
| 13:25.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 13:25.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 13:27.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~Adium@62.28.178.18) |
| 13:27.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 14:00.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev serafie (~erin@nat/digium/x-webelorobkdgtdbj) |
| 14:03.55 | jameswf | for those who may be interested: https://git.centos.org/ it is a little laggy. Something about geeks and shiny new things... |
| 14:05.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-zaxfiadfdxmzavim) |
| 14:05.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 14:08.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kharwell (~kharwell@nat/digium/x-cufsadpiekekuvzw) |
| 14:08.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev stevePearPear (~stevePear@cm244.epsilon47.maxonline.com.sg) |
| 14:19.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:19.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:24.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@23-228-175-118.mci.googlefiber.net) |
| 14:40.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 14:52.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 15:15.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rmudgett (~rmudgett@nat/digium/x-ydhtbpixxkijdwih) |
| 15:17.29 | coreyfarrell | file: that's fine, I figured it was a long shot that you'd still be awake. |
| 15:17.33 | coreyfarrell | I'm still not sure when to ref (ast_format_copy) and when to not |
| 15:18.48 | file | coreyfarrell, so if the format is on the stack and never freed using ast_frfree you don't need to bump it, unless you then add an ast_frfree |
| 15:18.58 | file | er if the frame is on the stack |
| 15:20.10 | file | if you've allocated a frame and it's going to get freed using ast_frfree then it needs to be bumped |
| 15:21.41 | coreyfarrell | ok I think I got it |
| 15:24.33 | coreyfarrell | I have 11 more main/*.c files compiling now, hoping to make it possible to start doing some runtime tests soon |
| 15:39.10 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: awesome |
| 15:39.19 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: thanks for working on that particular project :-) |
| 15:39.46 | coreyfarrell | mjordan: /branches/13 is coming up quick. |
| 15:40.36 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: yes, yes it is |
| 15:40.45 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: 5 weeks or so |
| 15:42.19 | tm1000 | mjordan: Will 13 finally make coffee. I've been waiting forever |
| 15:42.29 | tm1000 | file: Promised it back in 11 |
| 15:42.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (~newtonr@nat/digium/x-pppfobhdsfssyjre) |
| 15:42.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 15:43.58 | file | coffee, bah |
| 15:46.15 | coreyfarrell | there was talk a couple months ago about migrating testsuite to git, is that still planned? |
| 15:46.35 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: yes |
| 15:46.58 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: prioritization of things means I decided to not throw a monkey wrench into the testsuite or asterisk until after feature freeze |
| 15:47.25 | mjordan | although if someone wanted to contribute to the wiki page on it with 'here's some suggestions on this concept', that'd be appreciated |
| 15:49.20 | coreyfarrell | mjordan: testsuite doesn't really have branches, if git.asterisk.org started hosting an "official mirror" of the testsuite I think it could be helpful - assuming it would be an easy transition from read-only mirror to live copy |
| 15:50.32 | coreyfarrell | that way git + svn could "co-exist" for a bit |
| 15:51.52 | gtjoseph | perks up at the mention of git |
| 15:54.39 | mjordan | that would be good. My concern with not doing a full move of anything to git is that we'll probably get a pull request to the git mirror |
| 15:54.47 | mjordan | but testsuite is far less likely |
| 15:54.59 | mjordan | since it is used by a smaller number of people in the community |
| 15:57.30 | coreyfarrell | agreed. I'm mostly suggesting this so bamboo and other such things can be transitioned to git without a real deadline |
| 15:58.20 | coreyfarrell | for testsuite anyhow. I think asterisk is complex enough with branches that it might not be as easy to deal with maintaining a mirror - plus the issue of pull requests as you mentioned |
| 16:00.49 | gtjoseph | coreyfarrell: I have git mirrors of asterisk testsuite menuselect and mxml kept synced via subgit. All branches, tags, commit messages, authors, are mirrored |
| 16:00.58 | gtjoseph | it was a snap |
| 16:03.44 | pabelanger | pull requests can be closed with a bot, or forward properly to said code review system |
| 16:05.13 | coreyfarrell | gtjoseph: does subgit understand/associate svn merge revisions? for example from /branches/1.8 to /branches/11.. |
| 16:06.01 | gtjoseph | if you have an example of 1 that heppened recently, i can see exactly what it did. |
| 16:07.04 | file | subgit is nice |
| 16:08.07 | coreyfarrell | gtjoseph: r410224 in 1.8 -> r410225 in 11 -> r410226 in 12 |
| 16:08.33 | gtjoseph | looking |
| 16:09.42 | coreyfarrell | oops guess that's not too recent... was looking at a post commit working copy from a couple months ago |
| 16:10.58 | coreyfarrell | gtjoseph: r415599 in 11 -> r415602 in 12 is a couple commits ago |
| 16:11.16 | gtjoseph | looking again |
| 16:14.09 | gtjoseph | the only thing i see that ties them together is the commit message in 12 has the comment "Merged revisions 415599..." |
| 16:15.28 | coreyfarrell | I figured that much. would be nice if it could parse the commit messages and create a real git association between the commits |
| 16:15.51 | gtjoseph | could proably write a hook that does that |
| 16:16.54 | gtjoseph | svn really doesn't make the association either though |
| 16:18.25 | coreyfarrell | I know, once we migrate to GIT and make original commits/merges from git, it does associate |
| 16:19.07 | gtjoseph | it does indeed |
| 16:50.15 | tm1000 | rmudgett: seems impossible: http://www.freepbx.org/comment/307012#comment-307012 |
| 16:56.48 | rmudgett | tm1000: Yes. Seems impossible. Two parked calls cannot talk to each other. In v11 and earlier the parked calls cannot ever exchange frames. In v12 the holding bridge also doesn't exchange frames with other channels unless there is an announcer channel in the bridge. Even then the frames only go from the announcer to the held channels. |
| 16:57.37 | rmudgett | It is conceivable that a bug could park two calls into the same slot due to a race condition. |
| 16:58.19 | tm1000 | rmudgett: yeah I was thinking bug as well. trying to extract information from freepbx users is always rather difficult and since I use the direct parking application from Asterisk I’d have to file it against Asterisk. |
| 16:59.35 | rmudgett | If this is v12 then they may have a 3-party call that one of the parties parks. In that case the 3-party bridge is parked and the remaining two parties could still talk to each other over the MOH. |
| 17:00.08 | tm1000 | rmudgett: its 11.8.1 |
| 18:57.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@23-255-171-52.mci.googlefiber.net) |
| 19:21.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 19:30.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev serafie1 (~erin@nat/digium/x-ijjktjrgkdplvnve) |
| 19:45.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dovid (~Dovid@static-173-63-105-210.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net) |
| 19:46.35 | Dovid | Hi All. I am looking for a patch for Asterisk where I can set OUTBOUNDPROXCY and PROXYPORT as a variable in the dial plan. Is this possible and if yes can you do it? |
| 20:05.47 | wdoekes | Dovid: you don't need to patch to set outboundproxy in the dialplan |
| 20:06.03 | Dovid | wdokes: How would I set it? |
| 20:06.33 | wdoekes | <PROTECTED> |
| 20:06.33 | wdoekes | <PROTECTED> |
| 20:07.19 | wdoekes | documented on line 27420 in chan_sip.c |
| 20:07.53 | Dovid | wdokes: With that Asterisk will send the INVITE & PACKET to the same IP. when using outbound proxy it will send an invite of bob@1.1.1.1 to a proxy of 2.2.2.2 |
| 20:08.01 | Dovid | wdokes: What version of asterisk? |
| 20:08.26 | wdoekes | at least 1.8 and up |
| 20:09.35 | wdoekes | Dovd: I don't get what you said before that question |
| 20:10.52 | Dovid | when I dial: SIP/1234@.1.1.1) the call and the invite will be to 1.1.1.1. I want the invite to be 1234@1.1.1.1 but the packet should be sent to my proxy which is 2.2.2.2 |
| 20:11.07 | mjordan | SIP/1234@1.1.1.1/2.2.2.2 |
| 20:11.20 | wdoekes | mjordan: // |
| 20:11.22 | mjordan | er, actually, close, but not quite |
| 20:11.23 | mjordan | yup! |
| 20:11.32 | mjordan | SIP/1234@1.1.1.1//2.2.2.2 |
| 20:11.33 | Dovid | mjordan: Let me try that |
| 20:11.38 | wdoekes | what? |
| 20:11.44 | wdoekes | why try his and not mine? |
| 20:11.55 | Dovid | wdoekse: Sorry. I will try both :p |
| 20:12.05 | wdoekes | lol Dvide |
| 20:12.10 | mjordan | Dovid: try wdoekes. He's going to be correct. I'm just winging it ;-) |
| 20:12.19 | Dovid | ;) |
| 20:15.52 | Dovid | strange asterisk didnt even send out the call. gona debug |
| 20:24.30 | Dovid | What is the difference between: devicename and username? Also by default Asterisk sets the TO header as the source box and not the dest box? When I do Dial(SIP/1234@1.1.1.1//2.2.2.2) the To is: To: <sip:12127960900@1.1.1.1>. and i want it to be my Asterisk boxs IP. |
| 20:36.55 | wdoekes | Dvd: there isn't any difference. devicename/extension is synonymous with extension@devicename in the chan_sip Dial string |
| 20:37.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev serafie (~erin@nat/digium/x-tmzabbmlqkofsaww) |
| 20:37.48 | wdoekes | if a device is found, that info is used, otherwise the it is used a hostname/ip |
| 20:38.12 | wdoekes | the IPorHost bit as seen above is used as optional outboundproxy |
| 20:39.26 | wdoekes | er. there is a difference between "devicename" and "username", but isn't between "username" and "extension" |
| 20:39.41 | wdoekes | (in the aforementioned dial strings) |
| 20:40.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wdoekes (~walter@wjd.osso.nl) |
| 20:40.36 | Dovid | what about changing the domain in the to string? |
| 20:40.59 | wdoekes | line 27422 |
| 20:41.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev luckman212 (~luckman21@unaffiliated/luckman212) |
| 20:41.27 | wdoekes | <PROTECTED> |
| 20:41.28 | wdoekes | <PROTECTED> |
| 20:42.19 | wdoekes | i.e. SIP/bob@1.1.1.1//2.2.2.2!bob@todomain.com |
| 20:45.05 | jameswf | is dahdi realtime a thing? |
| 20:47.58 | mjordan | jameswf: dahdi or chan_dahdi? |
| 20:48.54 | jameswf | chan_dahdi |
| 20:49.47 | mjordan | static realtime would be a thing. |
| 20:49.58 | mjordan | I'm not sure what realtime buys you with chan_dahdi, however. |
| 20:50.27 | coreyfarrell | probably buy some bugs |
| 20:51.02 | jameswf | saves a step of writing out files.. :) |
| 20:52.23 | mjordan | I can say I've never set up chan_dahdi using realtime. Since chan_dahdi's configuration by definition is pretty tied to a particular system, I doubt many people try storing its configuration in a database |
| 20:52.50 | jameswf | has some stuff brewing in his head but seems like no one does it that way, wondered if there was a reason |
| 20:53.06 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: particularly with chan_dahdi's "unique" way of being configured |
| 20:53.47 | Dovid | wdoekes: Thank you sir: |
| 20:54.22 | jameswf | I guess it is no extra effort to generate a file than write out a database. |
| 20:56.23 | Dovid | wodekes: Can I change the from as well? |
| 20:57.51 | file | is perplexed by the idea of realtime and dahdi |
| 21:03.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins_ (~dan@cpc11-folk2-2-0-cust171.1-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 21:04.15 | Dovid | wdoekes: What is the reason for the //. Is there anything that I can put in the // or it has to be empty for Asterisk to know how to send the call. |
| 21:07.15 | wdoekes | Dovid: SIP/a/b/c <-- either a = bob@host and b = (empty) or a = host and b = bob. technically, you could go with bob@domain@host too, in which case you'd do either SIP/bob@domain/host or SIP/host/bob@domain |
| 21:07.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@bzq-218-28-58.cablep.bezeqint.net) |
| 21:07.37 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 21:07.53 | wdoekes | but I haven't seen any use cases of that (and the first @ will probably have to be escaped) |
| 21:09.07 | wdoekes | basically if you populate b while placing bob@host in a, unexpected things will happen |
| 21:11.03 | wdoekes | mm.. now I'm lying.. SIP/bob@domain/host will not do the above, it would attempt to find a device called bob@domain and if it doesn't, attempt to resolve the whole thing (not what you want) |
| 21:15.33 | file | go go chan_sip |
| 21:21.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev newtonr (~newtonr@nat/digium/x-wrlbjxoqlhocwudf) |
| 21:21.26 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o newtonr] by ChanServ |
| 21:32.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins__ (~dan@nat/digium/x-dnewrscfmphvxlxh) |
| 21:33.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@64.235.216.2) |
| 21:33.42 | coreyfarrell | file: I was looking at kharwell's question on r3602 (media formats config options) and it looks like it is possible for a format cap to have duplicates. does that mean my ast_format_cap_identical needs to change, or that format cap needs to prevent dups? |
| 21:34.19 | file | it shouldn't prevent dups |
| 21:34.23 | file | that would be going backwards |
| 21:36.35 | file | replied |
| 21:38.19 | coreyfarrell | hmm I'm not sure how to fix ast_format_cap_identical. I was thinking of checking from both directions, but that wouldn't prevent "ulaw,ulaw,alaw" == "ulaw,alaw,alaw" |
| 21:38.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins_ (~dan@nat/digium/x-ppemajpgojkqlqbh) |
| 21:39.38 | file | I don't understand |
| 21:40.16 | coreyfarrell | you had told me not to verify order |
| 21:40.22 | file | correct |
| 21:40.39 | coreyfarrell | so i'm currently checking if each format from cap1 is in cap2. |
| 21:40.47 | file | the above won't happen btw in practice |
| 21:40.57 | file | what will happen is the same codec with different attributes |
| 21:41.22 | file | ie: h264 with one set of attributes and h264 with another set - so you have two formats of the same codec but different attributes |
| 21:41.36 | coreyfarrell | ok so if I just expand it to check that each format in cap2 is in cap1 that will be adequate? |
| 21:41.49 | file | yes |
| 21:41.59 | file | if the result is equal, then you are good to go |
| 21:42.18 | file | if the result is not equal or subset then not identical |
| 21:42.24 | file | (from a format comparison perspective) |
| 21:42.50 | coreyfarrell | great. i'll get the review updated in a couple hours, unfortunately I have to run to a client site for some internet issue :( |
| 21:43.03 | file | did they try turning it off and on again? |
| 21:43.44 | coreyfarrell | ahaha I have no idea, don't really know these people I don't normally handle on-site work anymore but one of our clients opened an office 3 minutes from my house - so I'm it |
| 21:45.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev danjenkins__ (~dan@cpc11-folk2-2-0-cust171.1-2.cable.virginm.net) |
| 22:10.15 | mjordan | coreyfarrell: good luck :-) |
| 22:23.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev gtjoseph (~gtj0@unaffiliated/gtj) |
| 22:49.49 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kharwell (~kharwell@nat/digium/x-cufsadpiekekuvzw) |