| 01:09.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sustav (~vpp@76.73.166.16) |
| 01:13.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@user-69-1-6-49.knology.net) |
| 01:13.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 01:41.10 | *** part/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@user-69-1-6-49.knology.net) |
| 02:13.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com) |
| 03:02.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 03:02.34 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 04:31.19 | JunK-Y | i was looking at the find_alias() in chan_sip, is there a reason why this is an array and not an hash? that function is call like everywhere with __get_header(), sip_get_header() and almost all places we're dealing with headers. |
| 04:38.27 | Juggie | JunK-Y! |
| 04:51.52 | JunK-Y | yo yo! |
| 04:51.59 | JunK-Y | whats up? |
| 04:52.46 | JunK-Y | sorry i was about to leave, tty tomorrow |
| 06:29.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@69.23.116.90) |
| 06:45.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@69.23.116.90) |
| 07:45.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@2001:470:1f06:12c4::2) |
| 08:19.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 08:19.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 10:16.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jmls (~julian@host217-36-208-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 11:27.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jmls (~julian@host217-36-208-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 11:39.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 11:39.41 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 11:44.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev italorossi (~Adium@201.76.151.254) |
| 11:55.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev italorossi (~Adium@201.76.151.254) |
| 11:56.00 | *** part/#asterisk-dev italorossi (~Adium@201.76.151.254) |
| 12:12.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-dntthspvlkqacmnm) |
| 12:12.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 13:28.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@69.23.116.90) |
| 13:28.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 13:28.58 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 13:30.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev serafie (~erin@nat/digium/x-iewjjtbtleshboth) |
| 13:35.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 13:35.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 13:44.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger (~pabelange@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/pabelanger) |
| 13:44.27 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o pabelanger] by ChanServ |
| 13:58.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sustav (~vpp@nat/digium/x-zvyowylywwzeabyh) |
| 14:15.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev zerohalo (~zerohalo@74-94-141-204-ma.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 14:27.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger (~pabelange@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/pabelanger) |
| 14:27.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o pabelanger] by ChanServ |
| 14:28.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 14:28.31 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 14:48.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev vanguarde9 (~kica@dash.cnsk.sk) |
| 14:48.18 | vanguarde9 | <PROTECTED> |
| 14:48.29 | vanguarde9 | Hello people , I have question about computing of RTCP jitter in asterisk |
| 14:48.37 | vanguarde9 | http://pastebin.com/ia6zhLA6 |
| 14:48.51 | vanguarde9 | I dont understand why there is following line |
| 14:48.58 | vanguarde9 | rtcpheader[5] = htonl((unsigned int)(rtp->rxjitter * rate)); |
| 14:49.08 | vanguarde9 | Why is tp->rxjitter multiplied by rate ? |
| 14:49.50 | vanguarde9 | or who is the person I can ask about this code ? It part of res_rtp_asterisk.c |
| 14:50.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~otherwise@69.23.116.90) |
| 15:04.38 | kpfleming | there is no one person around who knows that code and can answer your question directly. anyone who wanted to do would need to research it to figure out what it's doing. |
| 15:13.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:13.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:22.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-zhxyvwktypyivmwf) |
| 15:22.06 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 15:26.54 | vanguarde9 | hm i hoped that this irc will be full of old geek-gurus |
| 15:28.57 | vanguarde9 | all of them siiting in dark room , with face close to their blac&green monitors |
| 15:29.29 | leifmadsen | those kinds of geeks are too good for irc |
| 15:31.08 | vanguarde9 | heh |
| 15:35.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-ujfhfnwywcrtbdqp) |
| 15:35.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 15:36.41 | *** part/#asterisk-dev vanguarde9 (~kica@dash.cnsk.sk) |
| 15:40.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-yhapfhxjmcezgmso) |
| 15:40.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 15:53.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-cxbrnlhvbnfsktoa) |
| 15:53.18 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 16:27.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sustav (~vpp@nat/digium/x-qmpvwzuqazezdnqy) |
| 16:43.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-zyjlnvukzfdbqbpn) |
| 16:43.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 17:26.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger (~pabelange@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/pabelanger) |
| 17:26.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o pabelanger] by ChanServ |
| 17:29.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sustav (~vpp@nat/digium/x-zgfrsmjopuqwqcdr) |
| 17:31.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-ehapcvxcwtljrfkv) |
| 17:31.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mjordan] by ChanServ |
| 18:04.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 18:04.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 18:20.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev italorossi (~Adium@189.124.200.92) |
| 18:25.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Tim_Toady (~fuzzy@188.4.44.30.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr) |
| 18:39.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sustav_ (~vpp@nat/digium/x-dlkkxptvdzlixnuc) |
| 19:17.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@187-28-37-118.poolip.RJO.embratel.net.br) |
| 19:43.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@189-25-81-45.user.veloxzone.com.br) |
| 20:00.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 20:00.03 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 20:06.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 20:06.43 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 20:14.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 20:14.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 20:15.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 20:15.25 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 20:23.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 20:23.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 20:58.21 | jsmith | kpfleming, Corydon76-work: I've got a new sacrificial lamb, I mean Mac Mini... anything you need me to test on OS X before it gets wiped out and replaced with Fedora? |
| 20:59.20 | Qwell | I wonder if anyone has ever actually tested uninstall or uninstall-all there |
| 21:00.00 | Qwell | I don't see why it wouldn't work though. |
| 21:00.11 | russellb | btw, i don't think uninstall removes libasteriskssl |
| 21:00.22 | russellb | noticed that, didn't care enough to bug report it :-p |
| 21:03.17 | kpfleming | Qwell can fix that |
| 21:03.46 | kpfleming | jsmith: no, the amount of caring we have for OSX has dropped rather a lot in the last year or two, as Apple has continued to destroy their toolchain's compatibility with the rest of the world |
| 21:04.24 | jsmith | kpfleming: WORKSFORME -- I obviously care very little about OS X :-p |
| 21:21.48 | russellb | but guys, at least 3% of asterisk servers are os x |
| 21:23.46 | kpfleming | exactly |
| 21:24.54 | mvanbaak | lol |
| 21:27.40 | otherwiseguy | Actually, *I* care about Asterisk on OS X as I have it installed on a Mac Mini for a friend's law office. |
| 21:27.54 | russellb | otherwiseguy: that was silly of you |
| 21:27.58 | otherwiseguy | Of course, since Asterisk is currently the only thing running on that mac mini, there really isn't a reason that I couldn't install Linux on it. |
| 21:28.09 | otherwiseguy | russellb: works like a champ! :) |
| 21:28.11 | kpfleming | correct |
| 21:28.13 | datachomper | viva la linux |
| 21:29.11 | otherwiseguy | (as long as you are careful) |
| 21:33.10 | mvanbaak | please drop gcc |
| 21:33.44 | kpfleming | from where? |
| 21:34.02 | mvanbaak | well, right now it's the only compiler to build asterisk |
| 21:34.06 | mvanbaak | drop the dependency |
| 21:34.14 | kpfleming | so if we drop it, then there won't be any compilers |
| 21:34.33 | mvanbaak | pcc, llvm |
| 21:34.33 | kpfleming | and your statement false, icc and clang are both able to build asterisk, at least. |
| 21:34.54 | mvanbaak | hum |
| 21:35.10 | mvanbaak | last time I tried clang did not build it all |
| 21:35.13 | kpfleming | there is no 'drop the dependency' anyway. it would be a massive amount of work to stop using the very useful GCC extensions that we use |
| 21:35.44 | russellb | mvanbaak: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/Your_argument_is_invalid.jpg |
| 21:36.15 | *** part/#asterisk-dev mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-ehapcvxcwtljrfkv) |
| 21:36.18 | mvanbaak | hum |
| 21:36.26 | kpfleming | so i would counter with 'convince the other compiler teams to implement some of the GCC extensions that programmers find useful' |
| 21:36.31 | russellb | mjordan needs an asterisk host mask |
| 21:36.34 | mvanbaak | I think it wont be that much work to get it compiled with pcc for example |
| 21:37.01 | russellb | mvanbaak: then make it happen, sir! |
| 21:37.07 | kpfleming | for example, we just started using nested functions, which will not be supported by a number of compilers. however, supporting them will be trivial for any compiler backend that can handle C++. |
| 21:37.09 | russellb | you haz the SOURCE |
| 21:37.51 | mvanbaak | yeah, I noticed the nested functions thing |
| 21:38.31 | kpfleming | and putnopvut has a review up for scoped locks, which can dramatically reduce programmer errors related to lock handling |
| 21:38.53 | kpfleming | alternatively, we could just rewrite it all in C++, then we wouldn't need all these extensions |
| 21:39.13 | Marquis42 | Or Haskell |
| 21:39.15 | Marquis42 | trolls |
| 21:39.48 | kpfleming | then we would need insanity |
| 21:39.59 | Marquis42 | Lots and lots. :) |
| 21:40.22 | Marquis42 | OTOH, I've been to AstriCon. I'm not sure the Digium folks are lacking in that area. :P |
| 21:40.30 | mvanbaak | gheh |
| 21:40.44 | Qwell | Marquis42: We save up the insanity, so we can expend it all at once. |
| 21:41.02 | Marquis42 | lol |
| 21:41.06 | Marquis42 | You do it well. :) |
| 21:41.24 | mvanbaak | it was just a tought |
| 21:41.30 | kpfleming | i still see updates from that Asian restaurant in Denver every so often on Facebook and it reminds me of Marquis42's fun evening |
| 21:41.31 | mvanbaak | one I have for a long time ;-) |
| 21:41.46 | Corydon76-work | mvanbaak: Asterisk compiles fine with clang, as long as you use the gcc-4.2 compatibility binary to do it |
| 21:41.47 | Marquis42 | kpfleming: :D |
| 21:42.00 | mvanbaak | Corydon76-work: uhhuh, exactly |
| 21:42.08 | mvanbaak | so it's still gcc |
| 21:42.13 | Corydon76-work | No, it's not |
| 21:42.31 | mvanbaak | <--- running a few boxes without gcc or gcc-like crap now |
| 21:42.43 | Corydon76-work | It's clang with sufficient wrappers to make it work with gcc-based command line arguments |
| 21:43.05 | mvanbaak | and every now and then I wonder what it would take to make asterisk work on it |
| 21:43.24 | mvanbaak | talking about the userland code |
| 21:43.30 | Corydon76-work | Depends upon the featureset |
| 21:43.39 | mvanbaak | the kernel code is a total different set |
| 21:43.59 | Corydon76-work | Variable-argument macros, for example, don't work on some C compilers |
| 21:44.03 | mvanbaak | Corydon76-work: pcc for example |
| 21:45.08 | Corydon76-work | Never heard of it |
| 21:45.21 | mvanbaak | netbsd and openbsd are switching to it |
| 21:45.36 | Corydon76-work | What about FreeBSD? |
| 21:45.50 | mvanbaak | freebsd is a gnu whore ;-) |
| 21:46.03 | Corydon76-work | FreeBSD is concerned with performance |
| 21:46.08 | russellb | netbsd and openbsd, leading the way in server technologies, dominating the market |
| 21:46.11 | mvanbaak | is it ? |
| 21:46.20 | Corydon76-work | And if you're running Asterisk, you're concerned with performance, too |
| 21:47.12 | kpfleming | unless you are running it on raspberry pie |
| 21:47.57 | Corydon76-work | I tend not to run telephones on fruity desserts |
| 21:48.39 | Qwell | no, you run fruity desserts on telephones |
| 21:48.48 | Corydon76-work | There's just too great of a potential for heartburn |
| 21:52.50 | russellb | lots of meds for that |
| 22:38.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev zerohalo (~zerohalo@74.61.196.236) |
