| 00:07.01 | jrrose | is around. Soft of. |
| 00:08.21 | jrrose | And that sounds like a somewhat vague question. |
| 00:14.23 | fulcan | I was trying to figure out how py-asterisk interfaced with asterisk since there is so little documenttation. There appears to be plenty of docs in C++ but my c skills are just a little better than fundemental. Much better in python but there is nothing on the web I can find info (of any value) on how the objects are passed to even run a test script. I'm not affraid of c, but a little explanation of the docs that I am reading would really he |
| 00:47.04 | Corydon76-home | pokes pabelanger |
| 00:47.55 | pabelanger | Corydon76-home: sup |
| 00:48.32 | Corydon76-home | Just finished that fix for OSX |
| 00:49.17 | pabelanger | nice |
| 00:49.21 | Corydon76-home | If you'd like to view/verify/test/review |
| 00:49.41 | pabelanger | sure |
| 00:50.04 | Corydon76-home | Let's just say that the defined rules in sounds/Makefile were a major PITA |
| 00:56.20 | pabelanger | Corydon76-home: :) |
| 00:56.36 | pabelanger | I'll test it out in the morning, and report back |
| 00:56.41 | Corydon76-home | Sounds good |
| 02:22.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CoderForLife (~Miranda@unaffiliated/coderforlife) |
| 03:32.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sezuan (bouncer@irc.scheff32.de) |
| 03:43.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev seraphie (~erin@75.76.38.159) |
| 04:55.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev irroot (~irroot@pbx.distrotech.co.za) |
| 05:37.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Netgeeks (~chris@gw1.netgeeks.net) |
| 06:30.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asterisk-learner (~chatzilla@193.227.170.247) |
| 06:51.35 | kaii | fulcan: py-asterisk has nothing to do with the C interfaces or the astobj2 container at all. it is just a wrapper for the manager API and talks to asterisk via TCP. google for "asterisk manager api" and you will find loads of documentation about the interface. |
| 06:52.43 | kaii | fulcan: and for more questions about this, i suggest #asterisk because it is mere a usage question than development (this channel is for C development of asterisk) |
| 07:19.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:19.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 07:20.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226) |
| 07:23.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~sgimeno@163.117.206.10) |
| 08:53.53 | Ulrar | I'm using asterisk 1.4. At each call end, Two CDR are generated, the first is clean, but the second has as a disconnect cause 19, no answer time (of course) .. Why is the second generated ? Is there a way to avoid it ? |
| 09:03.15 | kaii | Ulrar: please use #asterisk for user questions |
| 09:04.05 | Ulrar | I should ask question about cdr_ modules in #asterisk ? But it is a C question, no ? |
| 09:31.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jmls (~Julian@host217-36-208-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 09:31.16 | jmls | hey. |
| 09:31.26 | jmls | what's the story with the 2.0 branch ? |
| 09:31.31 | jmls | is it 1.10 in disguise ? |
| 09:47.20 | irroot | lol |
| 09:47.26 | irroot | jmls stealth mode |
| 09:47.57 | irroot | saw 1.10 then did not .... 2.0 appeared ... missed the memo |
| 10:41.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 10:41.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 11:15.47 | fulcan | kaii I have been to the #asterisk and those folks don't have a clue about code. I would love to see just 1 single piece of functional code to see exactly how the objects are passed. This is NOWHERE in any piece of documentation on the web. only therory which when I apply does not work in my test scripts. |
| 11:20.35 | fulcan | kaii and this example can be in any language, I know a little about almost all of them. Once I can spit out a varable passes to me from the belly of asterisk, I can figure the rest out from there, then the docs might start to make more sense. |
| 11:38.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 11:38.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 12:06.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev t_dot_zilla (~t_dot_zil@firewall-a.buf.ny.i-evolve.net) |
| 12:38.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev paravoid (~paravoid@zebra.cslab.ece.ntua.gr) |
| 12:59.13 | pabelanger | fulcan: what are you trying to do? |
| 13:00.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev t_dot_zilla (~t_dot_zil@firewall-a.buf.ny.i-evolve.net) |
| 13:22.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@209.250.158.226.tor.pathcom.com) |
| 13:34.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:34.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 13:41.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 13:41.05 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 14:02.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev luminforce (~luminforc@rrcs-71-42-183-54.sw.biz.rr.com) |
| 14:07.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 14:07.52 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 14:13.15 | Kobaz | so my goal is to finish up four more commits for 1.10 by this weekend |
| 14:13.24 | Kobaz | nothing like last minute :P |
| 14:14.27 | irroot | Kobaz not gonna happen :P 1.10 looks like its not there ... 2.0 now |
| 14:14.32 | Kobaz | rb1229, rb1010, rb464, and rb1230 |
| 14:14.39 | Kobaz | heh, what's not where? |
| 14:14.56 | irroot | /branches/2.0 |
| 14:15.04 | Kobaz | srsly? |
| 14:15.54 | Kobaz | ah, reading the mailing list now |
| 14:16.26 | Kobaz | That was the joke here at the office... "In honor of Linus..." |
| 14:17.04 | Kobaz | anyway, if i get the stuff done by this weekend then it'll either be ready for 1.10 or 2.0 |
| 14:17.07 | Kobaz | either way |
| 14:22.00 | JonathanRose | It's Asterisk 10 |
| 14:22.09 | JonathanRose | Mailing list says so. |
| 14:23.25 | JonathanRose | Oh wait |
| 14:23.27 | JonathanRose | it doesn't. |
| 14:23.31 | irroot | yet there is a /branches/2.0 and the "svn pl -v ." shows me 2.0 :-! |
| 14:24.08 | JonathanRose | I think right now it's 'officially' still 'Asterisk 1.10' |
| 14:24.20 | irroot | JonathanRose was so far behiend on mail by the time i saw the 1.10 branch was cut it was gone :P |
| 14:28.57 | JonathanRose | Since 1.10/2.0 beta still isn't really released yet, the branch name is still just random snarking. |
| 14:29.20 | tzafrir | chan_h323 fails to build in dev-mode (unused variables and such) |
| 14:29.50 | JonathanRose | tzafrir: Which version? |
| 14:30.00 | tzafrir | current 1.8 svn |
| 14:30.25 | JonathanRose | looking at it. |
| 14:30.36 | tzafrir | with gcc 4.6 (the one that complains about unused variables) |
| 14:31.11 | JonathanRose | Any menuselect flags in use? |
| 14:31.16 | tzafrir | and so is chan_vpb |
| 14:33.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 14:33.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 14:34.48 | JonathanRose | I guess I should update gcc before I compile since I'm using 4.4.5 |
| 14:36.08 | tzafrir | chan_vpb has a how of unused variables that are actually only used on remmed-out ast_verb messages |
| 14:36.28 | tzafrir | Shouldn't those be converted to debug messages? |
| 14:49.14 | Ulrar | I'm doing modules for asterisk 1.4, How should I name my function to support the CLI command "module reaload my_module" ? |
| 14:49.35 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Ulrar (~quassel@sd-25776.dedibox.fr) |
| 14:52.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-uumgdszdprudlady) |
| 14:55.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@c-67-165-218-19.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 14:56.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Ulrar (~quassel@sd-25776.dedibox.fr) |
| 14:56.23 | Ulrar | Erf', connection problem |
| 14:56.43 | Ulrar | so, don't know if my question has been sent |
| 14:56.45 | Ulrar | I'm doing modules for asterisk 1.4, How should I name my function to support the CLI command "module reaload my_module" ? |
| 15:07.05 | tzafrir | Ulrar, have you looked at any other module? |
| 15:09.25 | tzafrir | Ulrar, this is the 'reload' function in the struct you register with AST_MODULE_INFO |
| 15:09.47 | tzafrir | It is a common convention to call it "<something>_reload" |
| 15:09.58 | tzafrir | or just "reload" |
| 15:13.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:13.40 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:15.08 | Ulrar | Mh, thanks tzafrir, didn't knew that we can define those things in AST_MODULE_INFO |
| 15:15.33 | tzafrir | it's not that you can. You must |
| 15:16.48 | Ulrar | Don't know for the latest, but for 1.4 I never defined load and unload |
| 15:18.23 | Ulrar | 'cause I didn't found any docs about all of this I just did the same as other modules |
| 15:18.36 | Ulrar | And they were using AST_MODULE_INFO_STANDARD |
| 15:30.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:b94c:48eb:a0c7:850d) |
| 15:37.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Hive (~HIVE@173-165-205-1-jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 15:46.25 | JonathanRose | @tzafrir: Found out that Russell had already been working on warnings in GCC 4.6. He just missed those two channels. |
| 15:46.50 | JonathanRose | I imagine it'll get resolved before too long. |
| 15:47.13 | russellb | well i'm not actively working on it this minute |
| 15:47.51 | russellb | pabelanger: having the latest Fedora as a build agent would be good, if nothing else, just for testing compilation with more recent build tools |
| 15:48.00 | pabelanger | +1 |
| 15:48.13 | pabelanger | on my short list, along side CentOS 6 |
| 15:48.17 | russellb | yet another item for the todo list |
| 15:48.24 | russellb | yes, that would be good too |
| 15:48.37 | tzafrir | I asked someone from Vocetronix and he hinted that it would probably be a good idea to remove most the remmed-out code from chan_vpb |
| 15:48.37 | pabelanger | maybe even Debian unstable, if we have the VM resources |
| 15:49.00 | russellb | it would probably be good to remote chan_vpb entirely |
| 15:49.33 | Qwell | REMOTE IT |
| 15:49.41 | russellb | blinks |
| 15:49.50 | Corydon76-home | pauses Qwell |
| 15:49.54 | tzafrir | pabelanger, I actually realised home nice it is to use schroot to set up a build environment |
| 15:50.39 | Corydon76-home | places a spoon on Qwell's desk |
| 15:50.43 | Corydon76-home | unpauses Qwell |
| 15:55.42 | tzafrir | Basically schroot by default bind-mounts /home inside the chroot. So you can basically go on with building as usual inside that chroot |
| 15:59.39 | *** part/#asterisk-dev irroot (~irroot@pbx.distrotech.co.za) |
| 16:17.52 | luminforce | we have an issue where a remote peer sends a mid-call invite (session timer) INVITE> <TRYING <OK >ACK, except that the ACK is improperly formatted (and dropped by our OpenSIPS gateway), so Asterisk sends <OK 3 more times, and then hangs up, but does not send a BYE. shouldn't this BYE be sent anyway, even if there is chance it's not going to be received? |
| 16:33.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev b3nt_pin (~b3nt_pin@142.162.84.40) |
| 16:41.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@c-67-165-218-19.hsd1.co.comcast.net) |
| 17:00.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev irroot (~irroot@197.169.168.170) |
| 17:16.52 | jmls | r329104 |
| 17:16.59 | jmls | erm |
| 17:17.05 | Qwell | asterisk commit 329104 |
| 17:17.08 | Qwell | commit asterisk 329104 |
| 17:17.09 | jmls | heh |
| 17:17.13 | Qwell | stupid bot |
| 17:17.13 | jmls | lol |
| 17:17.16 | *** part/#asterisk-dev b3nt_pin (~b3nt_pin@142.162.84.40) |
| 17:17.29 | jmls | glad it's not just me ;) |
| 17:17.34 | jmls | ~kick bot |
| 17:17.35 | infobot | ACTION kicks bot |
| 17:17.50 | jmls | so. Russel. |
| 17:17.59 | jmls | Russell even |
| 17:18.09 | jmls | "Change Asterisk 2.0 to 2.0 in binary" ?? |
| 17:18.12 | Qwell | 10 |
| 17:18.25 | Qwell | See http://blogs.digium.com/2011/07/21/the-evolution-of-asterisk-or-how-we-arrived-at-asterisk-10/ |
| 17:18.35 | jmls | yeah. Seriously ? Only geeks will get it. |
| 17:18.37 | jmls | oh. |
| 17:18.39 | jmls | wait. |
| 17:18.41 | jmls | dammit |
| 17:19.23 | jmls | There are only 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
| 17:20.20 | jmls | point being: Do we have a 2.0 asterisk, or is it 1.10 ? |
| 17:20.30 | jmls | make svn checkout interesting .. |
| 17:20.39 | Qwell | It is 10. |
| 17:20.46 | Qwell | just...10 |
| 17:21.05 | jmls | so, my command " svn checkout http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/2.0 asterisk-2.0" did not work ? |
| 17:21.15 | jmls | :-D |
| 17:21.25 | Qwell | it is just 10 |
| 17:21.30 | Qwell | branches/10 |
| 17:24.27 | jmls | Â then shalt thou count to /10, no more, no less. /10 shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be /10. 1.10 shalt thou not count, neither count thou 1.8, excepting that thou then proceed to /10. 2.0 is right out |
| 17:24.54 | Qwell | heh |
| 17:26.17 | tzafrir | What exactly is /usr/sbin/asterisk-post-install ? |
| 17:26.30 | tzafrir | How should it interact with DESTDIR? |
| 17:26.57 | jmls | Once the script /usr/sbin/asterisk-post-install be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it. |
| 17:27.06 | jmls | right. enough. |
| 17:28.47 | irroot | if only you and DEAD people could read hex how many living can read HEX |
| 17:29.22 | jmls | 57005 and you makes 57006 people. |
| 17:29.51 | jmls | likes google |
| 17:30.01 | irroot | lol :P |
| 17:35.55 | malcolmd | jmls: ^ very, very funny :) |
| 17:42.07 | Corydon76-home | tzafrir: I get the distinct impression it is distro-specific |
| 17:43.05 | tzafrir | Corydon76-home, the point is that when you build with a DESTDIR you often don't want the system to mess with what you do |
| 17:43.20 | tzafrir | Well, that's me. not sure about you. |
| 17:44.15 | Corydon76-home | tzafrir: I was thinking more along the lines of package building |
| 17:53.48 | jmls | yeah, well, I've spent all day learning Ruby on rails and Coffeescript. I needed some light relief ;) |
| 17:57.42 | irroot | jmls still need to figgure out what the passengers are doing in the carridge or something like that |
| 17:58.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:b94c:48eb:a0c7:850d) |
| 18:04.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@173.239.136.98) |
| 18:54.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wdoekes2 (~walter@wjd.osso.nl) |
| 19:35.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (~anonymouz@187-28-37-118.poolip.RJO.embratel.net.br) |
| 19:45.03 | *** part/#asterisk-dev luminforce (~luminforc@rrcs-71-42-183-54.sw.biz.rr.com) |
| 19:53.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev michael-i (~anonymous@c-24-7-126-118.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 20:08.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~terry@69.76.217.40) |
| 20:54.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev michael-i (~anonymous@c-24-7-126-118.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 20:56.12 | michael-i | Just curious if anyone is crazy enough to be hacking on Lion? I have 1.8.5 compiling with a small patch (change some Makefile stuff to look for 10.7 instead of 10.6). Now I'm running into the "only weak aliases are supported in this configuration" problem again in adsi.h |
| 20:56.50 | Qwell | I do believe there was a fix post-1.8.5. Corydon76-home? |
| 20:57.32 | michael-i | The configure detects things incorrectly. Just wondering how I can override its findings when I make (I guess setting PBX_WEAKREF) |
| 20:57.35 | michael-i | ah, cool |
| 20:57.42 | Corydon76-home | I haven't messed with Lion yet. The primary issue would be the Xcode version, though, not the underlying OS |
| 20:57.45 | Qwell | oh |
| 20:58.04 | Qwell | I remember some weakref commit. Assumed it was for Lion. |
| 20:58.11 | michael-i | Let me peek |
| 20:58.36 | Corydon76-home | Qwell: no, it was for Xcode 4 |
| 20:59.31 | Corydon76-home | I've been testing current 1.8 on Snow Leopard with Xcode 4, and it compiles fine |
| 21:00.28 | Corydon76-home | Current 1.8 also won't install correctly on OS X until you apply the DESTDIR patch on reviewboard |
| 21:00.29 | michael-i | Was it in 1.8.5 branch or trunk? |
| 21:00.38 | Corydon76-home | Both |
| 21:00.46 | michael-i | So far only using live installs for testing, nothing production |
| 21:03.07 | michael-i | Is this what you're talking about: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=19031 |
| 21:03.42 | Corydon76-home | Oh, not yet committed. How about that? |
| 21:15.42 | michael-i | Hmm, patch didn't do it. I'm going to eat and come back to this in a bit. |
| 21:19.22 | russellb | does anyone actually _use_ asterisk on mac? or just compile it there for kicks? |
| 21:20.33 | seanbright | that depends on your definition of _use_ |
| 21:21.16 | seanbright | i would venture a guess that playing tt-monkeys and then hanging up is 'use' |
| 21:21.37 | seanbright | if you mean in production... well, you can just go diaf |
| 21:22.50 | michael-i | I use it for development of an embedded gui. It keep me from having to flash that device all the time. |
| 21:23.03 | russellb | fair enough, just curious |
| 21:23.19 | russellb | I guess it's not surprising that it would be used for development, and that's still valuable even if nobody uses it for production |
| 21:25.23 | Corydon76-home | I tend to see it running on a number of Mac laptops... |
| 21:25.38 | michael-i | I just had everything working yesterdayâ¦then upgraded to Lion and Xcode 4 overnight. Paying the price... |
| 21:25.49 | Corydon76-home | Think sales. |
| 21:26.45 | Corydon76-home | michael-i: yeah, experience leads me to be cautious in upgrading and not being one of the first. Let the early adopters shake out the issues, first |
| 21:27.24 | michael-i | I'm taking one for the team here⦠|
| 21:27.37 | Corydon76-home | and then, upgrade only with a full backup... Have you used Super Duper ? |
| 21:28.36 | Corydon76-home | I like it for the fact that it creates a fully bootable volume that can be used for repair/restore |
| 21:31.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-gqzhdtpinomfqinp) |
| 21:41.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-jzevdeptchfsvkyp) |
| 21:47.45 | michael-i | Starting to hate adsi. Seems to be the only broken bit |
| 21:58.27 | malcolmd | i'm sorry you're having to use that. i don't think anyone's touched that code in the better part of a decade |
| 22:00.49 | michael-i | Alright, I give. Nothing I do seems to work. Can someone recommend a workaround for avoiding this optional_api failure? I need app_voicemail but res_adsi is exploding. |
| 22:01.51 | michael-i | if I embed res_adsi instead of using it as a module? |
| 22:08.54 | pabelanger | I picked up a contract last year for a local Dr. office, they had some Mini mac servers running Asterisk on it. Needless to say I sold then new hardware once they needed DAHDI support |
| 22:14.36 | Corydon76-home | michael-i: buy me a box with OS X Lion on it, and I'll fix it |
| 22:24.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-sgwhmjaiqqevzznm) |
| 22:58.10 | michael-i | Corydon76-home: if it was in my budget, definitely :) for now I'm just trimming out the problematic modules |
| 23:11.50 | Corydon76-home | michael-i: or you can wait about a month, and when I upgrade, I'll fix it. |
| 23:12.05 | michael-i | Corydon76-home: I'd gift you the upgrade :) |
| 23:12.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202) |
| 23:12.22 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |
| 23:14.28 | Corydon76-home | The upgrade cost isn't the issue. It's the time to ensure that I won't have a broken machine on my hands post-upgrade |
| 23:15.43 | michael-i | I knowâ¦just thought I'd throw something on the table |
| 23:16.56 | michael-i | I'm having to disable way too much and I can't enable module embedding to work around. Might have to give up on this for now. |
| 23:19.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 23:57.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |