| 00:06.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cVsup (~yaaic@189.83.61.132) |
| 00:08.20 | cVsup | sruffell: hey man, you can say when you work with callerid again? |
| 00:11.37 | sruffell | cVsup: I'm hopeful I'll be able to look into it next week. |
| 00:14.22 | cVsup | sruffel: Ok, wait you, i hope that you fix this in next week. |
| 00:14.39 | cVsup | sruffell: Ok, wait you, i hope that you fix this in next week. |
| 00:14.40 | sruffell | sorry about stringing you along. |
| 00:14.48 | sruffell | ..it's not intentional |
| 00:16.38 | cVsup | I understand your problems and know that you will make good job. |
| 00:35.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cVsup (~yaaic@189.83.61.132) |
| 01:09.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 01:12.01 | pabelanger | error12-May-2011 19:55:02./configure: line 45289: 11900: command not found |
| 01:12.07 | pabelanger | on asterisk trunk |
| 01:14.04 | *** part/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 01:16.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~terry@68-70-72-166.static.kc.surewest.net) |
| 02:28.05 | leifmadsen | alecdavis: talk to rmudgett -- the cut off is tomorrow (Friday) |
| 02:28.21 | leifmadsen | alecdavis: he was working on them, and I'm not sure what all he was going to commit to 1.6.2 |
| 02:29.25 | leifmadsen | alecdavis: looks like he already closed the issue, so check to see what he did |
| 02:29.27 | leifmadsen | goes to bed |
| 02:34.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@17.140.211.66.inaddr.G4.NET) |
| 02:44.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 02:44.28 | *** part/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 02:48.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~terry@69.76.221.65) |
| 02:52.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (~terry@cpe-69-76-221-65.kc.res.rr.com) |
| 03:26.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 03:26.18 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 03:50.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cVsup (~peixoto@189.83.171.53) |
| 03:56.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie) |
| 04:10.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Juggie (~Juggie@unaffiliated/juggie) |
| 05:12.18 | *** part/#asterisk-dev alecdavis (~alec@202.36.76.21) |
| 06:28.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmidts (~schmidts@Lo20-rt01.lm33.sil.at) |
| 06:28.57 | schmidts | good morning |
| 06:34.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@2001:470:1f15:d79:64c2:49a2:e9a6:c456) |
| 06:34.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 06:35.31 | oej | MOrning folks |
| 06:39.47 | schmidts | morning |
| 07:11.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jdoe (jdoe@falseprophet.ca) |
| 07:14.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wedhorn (~wedhorn@123-243-209-34.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 07:19.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226) |
| 07:37.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@2001:470:1f15:d79:64c2:49a2:e9a6:c456) |
| 07:37.48 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 07:42.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@2001:470:1f15:d79:b42b:7578:f3a6:63e0) |
| 07:42.36 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 08:12.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 08:14.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:f9ab:32e7:f163:18e2) |
| 08:16.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@2001:470:1f15:d79:6509:1004:d3e3:6ac1) |
| 08:16.43 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 08:31.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asterisk-learner (~chatzilla@77.42.241.114) |
| 08:37.12 | wedhorn | question to anyone, what's the minimum size I can be guaranteed of getting for an int? (it's for a bit mask) |
| 08:38.47 | schmidts | IMHO 32 bit |
| 08:39.59 | wedhorn | 32 is fine, I guess I should've asked, is it possible that it may be limited to 16 bits? |
| 08:42.00 | schmidts | wedhorn only on a 16bit maschine but i am searching if there is some declartion for this |
| 08:43.08 | schmidts | wedhorn you could use a macro to check if the size of int is 16bit and declare a bigger var if it is |
| 08:43.33 | wedhorn | yeah, that's what I sort of thought, does asterisk/digium take a stand on this, ie, need at least a 32 bit machine? |
| 08:43.47 | schmidts | i am not sure about this ;) |
| 08:44.56 | wedhorn | schmidts: yeah, I could check the size, but it's redundant if it's not done elsewhere |
| 08:44.56 | schmidts | wedhorn use int32 and everything will be fine :D |
| 08:47.07 | schmidts | http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/64bit.html take a look here this should help |
| 08:47.57 | schmidts | sorry i meant int32_t not only int32 |
| 08:52.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 08:52.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 09:13.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev basti1101 (~basti1101@dslb-178-000-083-161.pools.arcor-ip.net) |
| 09:16.54 | basti1101 | Hello, i found the option "tlsverifyclient" in main/tcptls.c. but using it, only produced errors and server restarts. is this feature still under development? i can't find any documentation on this parameter. |
| 09:19.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jacc0 (~jacco@D522448D.static.ziggozakelijk.nl) |
| 09:19.30 | jacc0 | hi all |
| 09:19.46 | jacc0 | where can I find the License v3.0 papers to sign if I want to upload patches? |
| 09:19.57 | jacc0 | okay, I found this: https://issues.asterisk.org/view_license_agreement.php |
| 09:20.06 | jacc0 | should I print it and sign it? where do I send it? |
| 09:21.32 | kpfleming | do what it says |
| 09:21.57 | kpfleming | it's an electronic license agreement, just log in and follow the instructions |
| 09:24.48 | jacc0 | what instruction? |
| 09:24.55 | jacc0 | it only shows the license |
| 09:25.09 | kpfleming | did you log in to the issue tracker and click the 'Sign License Agreement' link? |
| 09:25.41 | jacc0 | okay, now i see :) |
| 09:25.51 | jacc0 | the form wasn't presented in https://issues.asterisk.org/view_license_agreement.php |
| 09:26.41 | kpfleming | that is because it is a way to "view the license agreement", as the link says |
| 09:28.06 | jacc0 | done :) |
| 09:46.02 | *** part/#asterisk-dev jacc0 (~jacco@D522448D.static.ziggozakelijk.nl) |
| 10:08.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Marquis42 (~bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 10:36.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 11:36.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 11:44.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 11:57.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 12:06.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 12:11.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jacc0 (~jacco@D522448D.static.ziggozakelijk.nl) |
| 12:11.26 | jacc0 | why does my patch state : [License PENDING (v3.0)] |
| 12:11.29 | jacc0 | ? |
| 12:11.45 | jacc0 | I just signed the online License |
| 12:12.48 | leifmadsen | jacc0: because it has to be approved by a real person |
| 12:12.55 | leifmadsen | you can still upload patches |
| 12:13.14 | leifmadsen | and the patch will become available once someone reviews the license agreement |
| 12:13.37 | jacc0 | :) can you review it? |
| 12:13.53 | leifmadsen | only the legal department can review legal issues |
| 12:14.03 | jacc0 | Iâve created a patch that will make asterisk ignore all media streams with port 0 and therefore will fix interoperability between asterisk and the HiPath 3000 V8 M5T SIP Stack/4.0.26.26 and will make asterisk more compliant with RFC3264 |
| 12:14.05 | jacc0 | :) |
| 12:14.17 | leifmadsen | patience is a virtue |
| 12:14.23 | jacc0 | you can find it here : https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=19281 |
| 12:14.42 | jacc0 | I realy hope my patch will make it to the official release |
| 12:14.47 | jacc0 | :D |
| 12:14.52 | leifmadsen | ya patch can't be reviewed until the license is reviewed and approved |
| 12:15.01 | jacc0 | I've add: && x |
| 12:15.06 | jacc0 | ac ouple of times :) |
| 12:15.23 | jacc0 | a couple |
| 12:33.29 | wdoekes2 | jacc0: your patch has formatting issues: (1) you got spaces instead of tabs, (2) at if(x) the indentation is bad, (3) secure_audio=0 is missing some spaces. and yes, people care. |
| 12:37.28 | leifmadsen | jacc0: I don't think you can see his patch yet |
| 12:37.41 | leifmadsen | at least not the 2nd one |
| 12:38.25 | leifmadsen | the first was submitted by schmidts |
| 12:39.17 | *** part/#asterisk-dev oelewapperke (wapper@eth1.mine.nu) |
| 12:40.03 | wdoekes2 | oh, you're right :) |
| 12:41.24 | jacc0 | I just added some " && x " |
| 12:46.45 | wdoekes2 | leifmadsen: my 19272 seems to be a dupe of 19192 |
| 12:47.07 | leifmadsen | wdoekes2: heh I asked that too and Chainsaw didn't think so :) |
| 12:47.33 | leifmadsen | I will mark them as duplicates at least |
| 12:47.49 | wdoekes2 | 14:17 <@leifmadsen> Chainsaw: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=19289 <-- same issue? |
| 12:47.54 | leifmadsen | oh doh |
| 12:47.56 | leifmadsen | wrong issue :) |
| 12:48.47 | leifmadsen | heh someone else must have thought the same thing because 19289 is also marked as a dupe of 19272 and I didn't do that ;) |
| 12:49.02 | leifmadsen | those issues should just be close as a group I guess |
| 12:50.13 | wdoekes2 | heh. I asked schmidts to dupe 19282.. are you sure you're not seeing double? |
| 12:54.35 | leifmadsen | I probably am |
| 12:54.38 | leifmadsen | I think I need glasses :) |
| 12:56.16 | jacc0 | @wdoekes2: you can see the patch I uploaded here: http://pastebin.com/J0yd2JzL |
| 12:56.26 | jacc0 | I would realy like to here your comments on that |
| 12:58.33 | jacc0 | where x is the port number -> if it's 0 it shouldn't use it |
| 13:07.41 | wdoekes2 | not much to say about that.. except perhaps that &len could in no way become < 0, so a check just (truth)len would be prettier next to (truth)x. and, my sscanf manpage says that one shouldn't assume that %n does or doesn't increment.. so those checks would probably rather be >= 1 than == 1. but this last comment has got nothing to do with the problem at hand. |
| 13:12.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 13:12.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 13:33.13 | jacc0 | ty |
| 13:33.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 13:34.49 | jacc0 | I realy hopes it'll make it to the official release; it would motivate me to make more |
| 13:37.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 13:43.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@242.Red-81-38-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 14:06.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@12.187.84.162) |
| 14:07.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 14:07.36 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 14:27.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Sipster (~Sipster@modemcable143.199-202-24.mc.videotron.ca) |
| 14:33.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rogersja (~RogersJa@S0106000f6695039f.gv.shawcable.net) |
| 14:42.05 | JonathanRose | So is '\' supposed to be an escape character when defining an extension? |
| 14:42.29 | JonathanRose | in extensions.conf I mean. |
| 14:42.45 | JonathanRose | Because I was playing with it and noticed that I could use... |
| 14:43.12 | JonathanRose | exten => 99999\;99999,1,<blah> |
| 14:43.25 | JonathanRose | and that would make an extension that looks like 99999\;99999 |
| 14:43.43 | JonathanRose | but if I just did => 99999;99999,1,<blah> I'd end up with nothing since it just gets commented out. |
| 14:44.20 | jsmith | JonathanRose: Try 99999[;]99999, and see if that works any better |
| 14:44.35 | jsmith | isn't sure it will be |
| 14:45.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev i_eat_children (~i_eat_chi@firewall-a.buf.ny.i-evolve.net) |
| 14:54.06 | JonathanRose | Nope |
| 14:54.14 | JonathanRose | Still just acts as a comment. |
| 15:33.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 15:47.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev JimDickenson_ (~dickenson@c-71-193-138-117.hsd1.or.comcast.net) |
| 15:51.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 15:53.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 16:27.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-hownkororqgyvkcu) |
| 16:45.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev citywok (~citywok@67-134-194-33.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 17:03.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev malcolmd (~malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 17:03.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 17:16.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98) |
| 17:21.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 17:21.20 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 17:26.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev citywok (~citywok@67-134-194-33.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 17:36.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev serafie (~erin@nat/digium/x-cplllmewbcadcxmd) |
| 18:19.14 | serafie | Re: Mantis -> JIRA migration. Has anyone had any trouble authenticating in the last 2 days? If you have not tried, would you please try to log in? Remember you will have to reset your password if you have not done so in JIRA yet. |
| 18:19.28 | serafie | http://issues.asterisk.org/jira |
| 18:24.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cVsup (~peixoto@189.83.171.53) |
| 18:25.40 | sruffell | I was able to login |
| 18:26.23 | serafie | sruffell: thanks! I would love to get some more testers outside Digium as well. |
| 18:39.14 | leifmadsen | serafie: I would suggest responding to the thread Russell started last week and say that you believe the login issues have been resolved and if anyone who had problems before could try again |
| 18:39.23 | leifmadsen | I bet a bunch of people gave up trying to test |
| 18:47.01 | serafie | leifmadsen: A brilliant idea. |
| 18:48.47 | jsmith | will test it |
| 18:50.30 | serafie | Thanks, jsmith! |
| 18:50.56 | Deeewayne | serafie, I tried a few days ago and couldn't authenticate; I have since changed my mantis password. Are you using the same db for passwords between mantis and jira ? |
| 18:51.49 | serafie | No, and in fact, the password hashing algorithms are different, so (as I said above and russellb said in his initial announcement) you will not be able to authenticate until you reset your JIRA password. |
| 18:52.03 | leifmadsen | serafie: I'd make that more clear in your reply :) |
| 18:52.16 | leifmadsen | Make it a separate note / paragraph |
| 18:52.33 | serafie | blech, already hit send. |
| 18:52.39 | leifmadsen | reply to it! ;) |
| 18:52.45 | leifmadsen | sorry, stepped out of the room |
| 18:52.53 | leifmadsen | and NOW I must go or my future wife will kill me |
| 18:54.15 | Deeewayne | its sloooow |
| 18:55.31 | sruffell | I wonder if that email went to the list a bunch of people are hammering on it nowâ¦when I just logged in earlier it wasn't this slow. |
| 18:55.46 | serafie | Deeewayne: slow to authenticate or to browse or both? |
| 18:56.12 | Deeewayne | I tried to reset my password and it is just waiting for issues.asterisk.org |
| 18:56.20 | Deeewayne | serafie, are you erin ? |
| 18:56.25 | serafie | yes |
| 18:56.29 | Deeewayne | oh hello :-) |
| 18:56.32 | serafie | ohai! |
| 18:57.26 | wdoekes2 | I was able to log in too |
| 18:57.27 | serafie | wow, it is slow. |
| 18:57.33 | serafie | thanks, wdoekes2 |
| 18:58.15 | Deeewayne | The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. |
| 18:59.04 | russellb | blames java |
| 18:59.25 | sruffell | heh |
| 18:59.52 | Deeewayne | pokes it with russellb's drum stick |
| 19:00.03 | russellb | \o/ |
| 19:00.25 | serafie | I wish I had a drumstick. |
| 19:00.41 | russellb | i have 2 of them in here that you may borrow. |
| 19:01.07 | serafie | I think my monitor would rather me not beat JIRA to a pulp. |
| 19:30.46 | russellb | serafie: feel free to smash it if you're willing to replace it |
| 19:30.58 | serafie | russellb: now I am wondering if this is an AJP problem. |
| 19:31.21 | russellb | serafie: that would be a difference between outside/inside connections wouldn't it ... |
| 19:32.09 | russellb | or wait, no, it's forwarded over AJP locally |
| 19:32.20 | russellb | no matter how it comes in |
| 19:32.31 | russellb | i'm just wondering if issues.asterisk.org connects to the JIRA box directly using AJP |
| 19:33.22 | russellb | yes, it is. |
| 19:33.29 | russellb | is/does |
| 19:41.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev malcolmd (~malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 19:41.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 19:50.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev seraphie (~erin@207.98.195.107) |
| 21:24.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev JunK-Y (~junky@pdpc/supporter/active/junk-y) |
| 23:40.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 23:40.15 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |