| 00:58.43 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@133.Red-83-41-197.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 01:01.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@192.55.64.189) |
| 01:21.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev msetim (~setim@186.215.34.189) |
| 01:21.28 | msetim | Hello |
| 01:22.04 | msetim | I'm here just because I googled for answers and I already try to ask on asterisk-users but this behavior isn't clear |
| 01:22.56 | msetim | I already read the http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9780596517342/ch13.html but it not answer my question |
| 01:23.25 | snuff-work | what is your question.. |
| 01:26.31 | msetim | How app_queue.c works when a queue member becomes available and I have a caller waiting A on queue Q1 and a caller waiting B on a queue Q2 and the Q1,Q2 has the same weight and the same agents with same priority |
| 01:26.34 | Freeaqingme | snuff-work, it's this game. We have to guess |
| 01:26.37 | Freeaqingme | oh, nvm |
| 01:27.24 | msetim | What call will be delivery first? The caller with the bigger waiting time or not? |
| 01:27.47 | snuff-work | mm.. generally don't agents have to login to queues.. therefore.. it would most likely answer the call on the queue it first logged into |
| 01:28.18 | snuff-work | if both queues had same weighting |
| 01:28.19 | msetim | ok. that's what happens when I've tested |
| 01:29.03 | msetim | so between queues the app_queue don't care about the waiting, is it? |
| 01:29.20 | msetim | s/waiting/caller waiting time/g |
| 01:30.47 | snuff-work | nope |
| 01:31.16 | snuff-work | it will care after the agent logged into both queues.. |
| 01:31.33 | snuff-work | but since it has to login to each separately.. |
| 01:31.59 | snuff-work | is not a 'queue' person |
| 01:34.04 | msetim | sorry snuff, when I said that "a queue member become available" I mean that the agent was busy (talking to another caller) and it becomes not in use (the caller/agent hangup the call). I was not saying that it "has logged and become available) |
| 01:34.24 | msetim | that's my case... How app_queue.c works when a queue member becomes NOT IN USE and I have a caller waiting A on queue Q1 and a caller waiting B on a queue Q2 and the Q1,Q2 has the same weight and the same agents with same priority |
| 01:34.28 | msetim | my bad |
| 01:34.35 | msetim | I don't want you wast your time |
| 01:35.52 | snuff-work | if the queues have the same weight.. there is no 'special' treatment of who should go next.. even if other caller has waited longer |
| 01:36.54 | snuff-work | you can alter someones 'priority' within a queue.. but not choose who should go first based on waiting times across queues |
| 01:37.06 | snuff-work | if both queues have same weight |
| 01:38.20 | msetim | oh my! thank you so much.. that's it what I guessing but I needed to make sure |
| 03:15.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@pool-71-111-144-184.ptldor.dsl-w.verizon.net) |
| 04:37.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev JonathanRose (~jonathan@nat/digium/x-lddoudderuwpyswb) |
| 06:25.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmidts (~schmidts@Lo20-rt01.lm33.sil.at) |
| 06:25.44 | schmidts | good morning! |
| 07:47.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 07:47.31 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 07:50.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:30ad:6d28:9241:c7c4) |
| 08:08.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 08:08.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 08:27.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asterisk-learner (~chatzilla@77.42.241.114) |
| 08:39.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226) |
| 08:58.52 | tzafrir_laptop | is upset. |
| 09:04.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@163.117.206.10) |
| 09:12.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 09:12.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 09:44.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@133.Red-83-41-197.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 09:51.25 | asterisk-learner | ast_test_flag(x,y); does crash if x is NULL ,right ? |
| 10:17.38 | wdoekes2 | yes |
| 10:56.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 10:56.51 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 10:57.37 | asterisk-learner | thx |
| 11:43.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asterisk-learner (~chatzilla@77.42.241.114) |
| 12:05.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ccesario (~ccesario@187.75.139.188) |
| 12:48.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev malcolmd (~malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 12:49.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 13:15.21 | schmidts | please take a look at R19021 it might be interesting ;) |
| 13:15.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@17.140.211.66.inaddr.G4.NET) |
| 13:43.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@17.140.211.66.inaddr.G4.NET) |
| 13:58.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98) |
| 14:46.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@17.140.211.66.inaddr.G4.NET) |
| 14:55.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 14:55.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 14:57.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 14:57.34 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 15:13.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:13.34 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:21.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fenlander (~fenlander@82.152.81.57) |
| 15:30.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@204.sub-75-208-52.myvzw.com) |
| 15:37.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ollii (~risker@2001:470:1f15:1384:62eb:69ff:fe31:b4) |
| 16:05.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rgagnon (~rgagnon@rrcs-71-42-183-54.sw.biz.rr.com) |
| 16:13.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98) |
| 16:46.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@static-213-115-251-100.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se) |
| 16:46.12 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 17:09.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@204.sub-75-208-52.myvzw.com) |
| 17:10.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@204.sub-75-208-52.myvzw.com) |
| 17:30.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@86.sub-69-99-146.myvzw.com) |
| 17:46.08 | *** part/#asterisk-dev ollii (~risker@2001:470:1f15:1384:62eb:69ff:fe31:b4) |
| 18:05.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev msetim (~setim@186.214.197.221) |
| 18:34.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@192.55.64.189) |
| 18:39.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rgagnon (~rgagnon@rrcs-71-42-183-54.sw.biz.rr.com) |
| 18:44.12 | msetim | I need to ask for a direct contact with a report of digium. I would like to pay for a development on specific version. is it permitted to ask there? I google and I don't find out the user contact. |
| 18:44.13 | msetim | <PROTECTED> |
| 18:44.23 | msetim | I'm not sure if I can do it =/ |
| 18:50.11 | jsmith | msetim: You can ask, but typically they're very busy and may not have free cycles to do paid development |
| 18:50.35 | jsmith | msetim: You can also ask on the asterisk-biz mailing list, and there may be other third parties that will help you with your development |
| 18:52.16 | msetim | jsmith, thank you! I got it! I will give a long shot :) If the reporter is very busy I will try asterisk-biz. |
| 18:55.52 | kpfleming | msetim: Digium does not do paid Asterisk development except for long-term contract customers under license agreements. if you need development done for a relatively small project, we'd end up referring you a development partner. |
| 18:59.26 | Qwell | kpfleming: he means a random reporter on mantis |
| 19:04.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~Adium@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 19:04.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 19:05.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@c-76-21-79-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 19:12.49 | msetim | kpfleming, can I found a development partner on asterisk-biz? |
| 19:13.09 | msetim | is for a small project |
| 19:15.01 | kpfleming | yes |
| 19:15.10 | kpfleming | that's the best place to look for one |
| 19:26.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@c-76-21-79-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 19:41.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev alecdavis (~alec@202.36.76.21) |
| 19:44.41 | alecdavis | russellb: asterisk 1.8 debian packages available, documented as squeezy??? shouldn't that be 'squeeze', the next debian release is 'wheezy' |
| 19:51.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@c-76-21-79-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 19:57.12 | kpfleming | alecdavis: yes |
| 20:04.37 | russellb | alecdavis: yes, that was a typo .... |
| 20:04.46 | russellb | but I like squeezy better, anyway. |
| 20:05.00 | russellb | unfortunately, I can not edit email that was already sent, heh. |
| 20:05.19 | kpfleming | you can recall it! |
| 20:07.41 | alecdavis | the wiki link in the email also has squeezy... |
| 20:08.29 | alecdavis | yeah, but squeezy wasn't in 'Toy Story' |
| 20:09.37 | kpfleming | on the wiki it can be fixed |
| 20:10.54 | russellb | fixed |
| 20:12.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@bzq-218-155-146.cablep.bezeqint.net) |
| 20:12.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 20:43.05 | *** part/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@static-213-115-251-100.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se) |
| 21:02.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98) |
| 21:38.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 21:44.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202) |
| 21:44.09 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 22:03.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (~outtolunc@c-76-21-79-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 22:29.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev cyphorious (~cyphoriou@chello062178189196.2.15.tuwien.teleweb.at) |