| 00:51.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@189.63.48.180) |
| 02:31.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 02:31.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 03:31.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy_ (~moy@64.231.53.158) |
| 05:02.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev shamelessn00b (~chatzilla@58-65-172-114.nayatel.pk) |
| 05:03.00 | shamelessn00b | Hi all |
| 07:21.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmidts (~schmidts@lmlo.sil.at) |
| 07:22.01 | schmidts | good morning |
| 07:32.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev asterisk-learner (~chatzilla@77.42.241.114) |
| 07:32.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wedhorn (~nnnnnnnnn@123-243-209-34.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 07:32.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mog (~mog@c-68-62-169-225.hsd1.al.comcast.net) |
| 08:02.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lftsy (~lftsy@install.deckpoint.ch) |
| 09:21.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 09:36.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev wedhorn (~nnnnnnnnn@123-243-209-34.static.tpgi.com.au) |
| 09:55.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (~tamiel@213.30.183.226) |
| 12:01.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 12:01.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 12:56.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 12:56.03 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 13:00.13 | schmidts | hello guys, just a short question: http://www.asterisk.org/doxygen/trunk/features_8c-source.html#l03574 am i the only one who miss something here like a ELSE ? |
| 13:00.31 | schmidts | atleast this cause a core dump and adding an else there solves it |
| 13:02.48 | jsmith | schmidts: Certainly looks missing to me. |
| 13:03.04 | jsmith | schmidts: Have you reported it on the asterisk-dev mailing list? |
| 13:04.30 | schmidts | nope i just hit it right now and figured out that there is a problem and it looks strange for me, i am right now searching in the revs since when this looks like this |
| 13:08.34 | schmidts | this cause a coredump after a bridged call gets hungup if the mysql cdr backend is not reachable |
| 13:15.49 | schmidts | it looks like it happens between rev 166660 and 166670 |
| 13:16.10 | schmidts | http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8/main/features.c?view=diff&r1=166660&r2=166670&diff_format=l |
| 13:16.18 | schmidts | but that doesnt make any sense to me |
| 13:25.22 | schmidts | i open an issue for this, even this part of code is there for a long long time (1.4) |
| 13:31.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161) |
| 13:51.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 13:51.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 13:52.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@UNVLON55-1176057127.sdsl.bell.ca) |
| 14:08.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev espiceland (~erin@nat/digium/x-bdlekefcmtubvebv) |
| 14:08.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev espiceland (~erin@nat/digium/x-ufbkwibasokpzpod) |
| 14:19.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@tesla.alkaloid.net) |
| 14:37.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.96.186) |
| 14:53.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 14:53.03 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 15:02.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@buero-gw.dortmund.loca.net) |
| 15:06.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@nat/digium/x-sugxvjkfyslymuty) |
| 15:08.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 15:08.35 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 15:25.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 15:25.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 15:29.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (~jpeeler@asterisk/developer/jpeeler) |
| 15:29.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 15:38.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161) |
| 15:47.16 | pabelanger | Corydon76-home: http://asterisk.pastebin.com/RtA0vpRg |
| 15:47.49 | pabelanger | regarding filename globbing for modules.conf |
| 15:49.46 | Corydon76-home | pabelanger: Hmmm |
| 15:59.33 | seanbright | and what about ? support? |
| 15:59.58 | seanbright | i need ? support for my modules |
| 16:00.26 | seanbright | load => res_?????? |
| 16:00.37 | russellb | noload => .*sip.* |
| 16:00.46 | russellb | i need that |
| 16:00.53 | seanbright | YES |
| 16:01.01 | Corydon76-home | Hey, now |
| 16:01.11 | pabelanger | runs away |
| 16:01.39 | seanbright | full regex support |
| 16:01.52 | Corydon76-home | pabelanger: I'll look at it after hours. It's 10:00 |
| 16:04.23 | Juggie | working after hours is forbidden |
| 16:06.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 16:06.05 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 16:12.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@12.187.84.162) |
| 16:13.06 | Corydon76-home | Juggie: noted |
| 16:33.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@24.214.206.254) |
| 16:47.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@6.Red-88-26-139.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 16:58.30 | *** part/#asterisk-dev PaulW_cdot (~paul@142.204.133.124) |
| 17:00.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@0xd99d3f8f.customer.cybercity.dk) |
| 17:08.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev BMJ (~bmj@nat/digium/x-gbddchtwkljgekrx) |
| 17:08.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o BMJ] by ChanServ |
| 17:21.48 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 17:41.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@189.63.48.180) |
| 17:46.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@6.Red-88-26-139.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 17:48.06 | guilhermebr | i write a app module that receive a call and dial to destination. how my module detect dtmf in a channel? |
| 17:49.21 | kpfleming | by watching for AST_FRAME_DTMF frames in the stream of frames from the channel |
| 17:50.38 | guilhermebr | i need create a thread for this? or exist a function done ? |
| 17:50.49 | russellb | no need to create a thread |
| 17:51.01 | russellb | your application should be running a loop that does ast_waitfor() / ast_read() / process frame |
| 17:51.11 | russellb | if it doesn't your application is broken |
| 17:55.16 | guilhermebr | hmm tnks, i will search in project a example |
| 18:13.48 | guilhermebr | in my module, i run dial command, if i put ast_waitfor after this, dont run right? |
| 18:14.16 | guilhermebr | for this i need write a res_ module? |
| 18:14.36 | guilhermebr | cause my module stop when dial is running... |
| 18:16.01 | guilhermebr | my module wait the dial, dont stop.. sorry |
| 18:45.59 | russellb | your module has no control while Dial() is running |
| 18:55.52 | moy | guilhermebr: sounds like you should not be writing this on C, why are you doing it in C if you're gonna use Dial command? |
| 19:42.04 | guilhermebr | moy, i use pbx_findapp(Dial) + pbx_exec |
| 19:42.27 | kpfleming | why not just write an AGI script then? it would be much easier |
| 19:42.36 | guilhermebr | moy, i just writing a module to study... |
| 19:42.57 | guilhermebr | a module that controls all calls |
| 19:43.51 | guilhermebr | the module receive the extension, search in database the action, and do |
| 19:44.42 | guilhermebr | if press a number when call is running, search in database the feature |
| 19:54.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Corydon76-dig (yellow@c-69-137-80-31.hsd1.tn.comcast.net) |
| 19:54.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Corydon76-dig] by ChanServ |
| 19:54.22 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Corydon76-dig (yellow@c-69-137-80-31.hsd1.tn.comcast.net) |
| 19:54.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Corydon76-dig (mauve@c-69-137-80-31.hsd1.tn.comcast.net) |
| 19:54.52 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Corydon76-dig] by ChanServ |
| 19:55.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161) |
| 20:17.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev philipp64|laptop (~chatzilla@192.55.64.175) |
| 20:31.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 20:31.40 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 21:09.09 | citywok | I started working on app_confbridge, i added the feature i just added to meetme. does it look like i'm not screwing it up too badly? http://pastebin.com/bWsr6Wk5 |
| 21:09.16 | citywok | if it looks decent, i'm going to start adding i and I from meetme |
| 21:26.21 | seanbright | i've always felt like app_confbridge should have a generalized extension mechanism rather than packing it with the same features as app_meetme |
| 21:26.36 | seanbright | but i have no code to back that up, so... |
| 21:29.11 | russellb | well there might be some features that could be implemented with some fancy dialplan or something |
| 21:29.18 | russellb | needs to be taken at a case by case basis |
| 21:32.46 | citywok | i've got i, I, and h working |
| 21:33.07 | russellb | nice moves |
| 21:33.08 | citywok | well, i need to track user count to get the right filename |
| 21:33.13 | citywok | working on adding that right now |
| 21:33.29 | citywok | i don't see it in the conference_bridge struct lol |
| 21:33.34 | kpfleming | can't that be done in the dialplan using GROUP and LOCK? |
| 21:34.01 | russellb | i don't know what we're talking about |
| 21:34.16 | kpfleming | telling you which member you are in the conference |
| 21:35.00 | russellb | oh |
| 21:35.14 | citywok | i need to know which user you are to replicate the way meetme saved the recording files. i suppose i could use a rand jsut as easily, but that's not how meetme did it lol |
| 21:36.23 | kpfleming | implement the feature in the right way, don't just do it the way app_meetme did :-) |
| 21:36.26 | citywok | ah, it was there under users, i r blind |
| 21:36.41 | citywok | which would be right, use rand, or use the usercount? |
| 21:36.50 | kpfleming | the channel already has a unique name |
| 21:36.57 | kpfleming | UNIQUEID, IIRC |
| 21:37.14 | citywok | yea, not sure how to get to it from here though (i r n00b) |
| 21:37.36 | russellb | chan->uniqueid |
| 21:38.01 | russellb | ast_log(LOG_NOTICE, "Channel '%s' has uniqueid '%s'\n", chan->name, chan->uniqueid); |
| 21:38.01 | citywok | so conference_bridge_user->chan->uniqueid should work right? |
| 21:38.08 | russellb | something like that |
| 21:38.47 | seanbright | also: stop saying 'i r <something>' |
| 21:38.49 | seanbright | kthx |
| 21:38.51 | seanbright | heh |
| 21:39.16 | citywok | yup, that looks like it works. 2048697202 |
| 21:41.49 | russellb | seanbright: where is your commit of the week? |
| 21:43.23 | seanbright | pfft |
| 21:44.06 | kpfleming | it's only mondayish |
| 21:45.27 | citywok | where do i find docs on functions like ast_play_and_record? i'm curious what ast_dsp_get_threshold_from_settings was from meetme, and what it should be set to. |
| 21:47.56 | citywok | I went and imported dsp and it lets me access it, but i'm kind of curious what it's actually doing. |
| 21:49.28 | jsmith | citywok: Did you look at the doxygen docs? |
| 21:49.44 | russellb | doxygen docs are the best we have |
| 21:49.46 | russellb | that and the source ... |
| 21:50.10 | jsmith | citywok: http://www.asterisk.org/developers/documentation |
| 21:51.33 | citywok | kk, ty |
| 21:57.54 | citywok | if anybody wants to take a look at the new i,I,and h options in the confbridge http://pastebin.com/mZU56Xjy |
| 21:58.48 | citywok | ignore the hard coded line 103, i fixed that using the ast_pool_dir |
| 21:59.09 | russellb | reviewboard :-) |
| 21:59.20 | citywok | lol |
| 21:59.35 | russellb | you sure lol a lot |
| 21:59.38 | citywok | after posting it to reviewboard do i need to do anything after that (assuming no changes are suggested)? |
| 21:59.54 | citywok | like with the meetme update i posted? |
| 21:59.58 | citywok | lol |
| 21:59.58 | citywok | ;) |
| 22:00.02 | russellb | if you'd like, email jpeeler@digium.com to get set up with commit access |
| 22:00.11 | russellb | that way, once another committer gives you a "Ship It!", you can just merge it |
| 22:00.32 | russellb | you can also use your commit access to work on patches in developer branches |
| 22:00.47 | citywok | i think i like NOT having access to break *... |
| 22:01.03 | russellb | k, then you have to post it up on mantis and wait for someone else to get around to committing it, heh |
| 22:01.22 | russellb | points to the > 800 open issues |
| 22:01.27 | russellb | we're a little bit overloaded at the moment |
| 22:01.40 | citywok | oh... maybe i'll send an email then |
| 22:01.42 | russellb | so the more people that can commit their own patches the better |
| 22:01.54 | russellb | it's one less thing that we have to deal with |
| 22:02.06 | kpfleming | especially if they are willing to address other issues from the issue tracker... hint hint :-) |
| 22:02.08 | russellb | it's much easier if we can just say "yeah, looks good", and then let contributors handle the svn parts |
| 22:02.14 | russellb | kpfleming: one step at a time, muahahaha |
| 22:02.15 | citywok | yea, with how little C i know i'd prefer i know a couple people looked over the code heh. |
| 22:02.23 | russellb | citywok: exactly, that's what reviewboard is for |
| 22:02.32 | russellb | get someone to sign off on it first, then no worries |
| 22:02.48 | citywok | okiedokie |
| 22:04.50 | citywok | What's jpeelers first name? |
| 22:05.01 | russellb | Jeff |
| 22:05.13 | russellb | jpeeler: <--- he's right there, too |
| 22:05.25 | citywok | yea, i saw him in the channel. there too. |
| 22:05.35 | russellb | he'll respond with a list of info he needs |
| 22:06.04 | citywok | SSN, CreditCard Number, and a $5,000 deposit for good faith? :P |
| 22:06.09 | Kobaz | sure |
| 22:06.23 | citywok | then he'll send me the 47 million from his great aunt so and so's death 3years ago? |
| 22:06.37 | Kobaz | we'll make sure all your info is secured with tripple rot-13 |
| 22:06.43 | citywok | hahaha |
| 22:06.52 | citywok | why not just double, or isn't quad even better?! |
| 22:07.17 | russellb | juggles Kobaz |
| 22:07.27 | Kobaz | feels juggled |
| 22:07.42 | russellb | :-p |
| 22:09.24 | citywok | do i need to unlock the conference to play my sound files? I haven't touched the locks at all but it looks like in some other places in the code it gets unlcoked, playback, relock. |
| 22:09.58 | russellb | I think so. |
| 22:10.11 | russellb | sounds familiar, though I can't remember the reasoning |
| 22:10.15 | citywok | it plays, so i'm not 100% sure, maybe it has something to do with 5 poeple joining at once |
| 22:10.36 | Kobaz | you need to stop audio bridging on the conference in order to mix in something |
| 22:10.53 | Kobaz | or at least that's my experience... i couldn't get a file to play without stopping audio on the bridge first |
| 22:11.16 | Kobaz | i have some code that does that |
| 22:11.20 | Kobaz | i can go find it |
| 22:11.41 | citywok | i'm able to play audio to the conf while it's locked |
| 22:11.44 | Kobaz | https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16617 |
| 22:12.14 | Kobaz | https://issues.asterisk.org/file_download.php?file_id=25047&type=bug |
| 22:12.26 | Kobaz | pokes russellb |
| 22:12.31 | russellb | falls over |
| 22:12.32 | russellb | what'd i do |
| 22:12.38 | Kobaz | russellb: when does that patch go in :P |
| 22:12.39 | citywok | you fell over |
| 22:13.13 | russellb | Kobaz: get sign-off on reviewboard and then you can merge it |
| 22:13.14 | Kobaz | hmm... i thought i put that on the reviewboard |
| 22:13.19 | Kobaz | where did it go |
| 22:13.25 | russellb | oh, then if so, i/we fail at reviewing |
| 22:13.39 | Kobaz | i swear i put that on |
| 22:14.05 | Kobaz | oh damn... i put on the other two but not that one |
| 22:14.23 | Kobaz | oh well |
| 22:15.12 | Kobaz | epic fail at remembering to put on reviewboard |
| 22:15.27 | citywok | lol |
| 22:15.38 | citywok | so something to do with 2 people joining at once, it segfaults as it is now. |
| 22:15.47 | russellb | citywok: you win a prize! |
| 22:16.00 | citywok | for......... |
| 22:16.05 | russellb | making it crash |
| 22:16.06 | citywok | segfaulting? weeee |
| 22:16.09 | Kobaz | for finding a new feature |
| 22:16.16 | russellb | your prize is ..... the honor of using gdb to debug it and fix it! |
| 22:16.19 | citywok | heh, i found a couple of those. |
| 22:16.22 | russellb | (or valgrind, whatever) |
| 22:16.32 | citywok | with the bug in libneon i can make calendaring crash * |
| 22:16.51 | russellb | double prize |
| 22:16.53 | citywok | yay.jpg |
| 22:16.56 | russellb | all the way across the sky |
| 22:18.44 | citywok | hmm. something tells me i have to write the logic to find out if another user is being introduced, and if so wait until that is done before intro'ing the next user |
| 22:19.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (~tamiel@ip-175.net-89-3-223.rev.numericable.fr) |
| 22:20.50 | kpfleming | yeppers |
| 22:21.03 | kpfleming | or at least have some lock that causes the second one to wait until the first one is done |
| 22:24.19 | citywok | yup, it was actually backwarsd. it needs to be locked. in other places it gets unlocked, playback, lock. but that causes segfault. |
| 22:24.22 | Kobaz | https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1010/ |
| 22:24.40 | Kobaz | i did my good deed for the day |
| 22:28.09 | citywok | hmm, i can seg it either way actually. locked or unlocked. doh. |
| 22:49.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 23:09.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jmls (~Julian@host217-36-208-155.in-addr.btopenworld.com) |
| 23:09.20 | jmls | hey! Evening all |
| 23:10.10 | jmls | is this anything to be worried about ? |
| 23:10.13 | jmls | <PROTECTED> |
| 23:10.24 | jmls | (several of those during compilation) |
| 23:17.06 | putnopvut | That doesn't sound worrisome. A deprecated function should still work, but it should also be warning to developers to update their code since the function may go away later. |
| 23:17.50 | jmls | okies. Thanks. Was compiling on Centos 5.5 with all patches up to date |
| 23:19.03 | putnopvut | Yep, the thing is, with a warning like that, it may be that one day you update your kernel and find that those warnings have turned to errors since the function is just no longer around. Of course, I say that even though I don't actually know the Linux kernel's policy about function deprecation. |
| 23:24.05 | kpfleming | that is it, exactly |
| 23:24.24 | kpfleming | at some point they'd be gone, but you'd have to recompile to see that, because it'd be across a version number change |
| 23:32.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 23:37.01 | *** part/#asterisk-dev datachomper (~Adium@207.98.189.248) |
| 23:41.53 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (~brett@c-76-26-221-79.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 23:41.53 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 23:48.05 | jdoe | jmls: something you should worry about before upgrading to centos6, you should be fine within 5.x though. |