| 00:12.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger-lap (~pabelange@CPE0013f7abc09a-CM0013f7abc096.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 00:59.20 | philipp64|laptop | what's the header-to-payload ratio of SDP over IPv6, by the way? I'm thinking it must be close to 1;1 |
| 01:11.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 01:36.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 01:57.56 | pabelanger-lap | Do I need to do anything special for bamboo to send me jabber messages? I don't think I have received anything |
| 01:58.17 | pabelanger-lap | heh, just realized it was down |
| 01:58.45 | leifmadsen | :) |
| 02:40.00 | Corydon76-dig | pabelanger-lap: how exactly would it know what your JID was? |
| 02:41.32 | pabelanger-lap | Corydon76-dig: under my profile I can enter my Jabber account, but I don't think I have received anything. Maybe I need to add bamboo to my client list |
| 03:12.22 | *** part/#asterisk-dev ManxPower (~manxpower@216.186.151.147) |
| 03:31.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@83.39.70.194) |
| 04:30.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@83.39.70.194) |
| 04:31.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ManxPower (~manxpower@216.186.151.147) |
| 04:32.09 | ManxPower | is there a list of major changes in 1.6 available without having to check out trunk? |
| 04:32.22 | ManxPower | *sigh* I mean 1.8, of course. |
| 04:33.47 | snuff-work | probably the 'CHANGES.TXT' |
| 04:34.01 | snuff-work | or UPGRADE.TXT |
| 05:06.02 | Corydon76-dig | ManxPower: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk/CHANGES |
| 05:43.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 05:43.20 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 05:43.32 | snuff-work | ello kp |
| 05:43.47 | kpfleming | snuff-home: morning |
| 05:44.42 | snuff-work | mm its weird.. there is no 'search' function on reviewboard.. or is there something i'm not seeing? |
| 05:45.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@206.Red-88-24-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 05:47.08 | kpfleming | no, i don't think there is |
| 05:48.36 | snuff-work | ah well.. just had to use the 'google method' of 'search string site:reviewboard.asterisk.org' |
| 06:31.05 | ManxPower | Corydon76-dig, THANKS! |
| 06:46.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev josexato (~josexato@200.108.108.44) |
| 06:59.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 06:59.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 07:02.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@226.Red-80-33-64.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 08:02.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hehol (~hehol@buero-gw.dortmund.loca.net) |
| 08:07.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 08:07.34 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 08:14.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe_ (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 08:15.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 08:22.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 08:24.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 08:41.29 | Gugge | mpe: network trouble? :) |
| 08:52.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 08:52.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 09:15.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@83.39.70.194) |
| 09:21.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev andrebarbosa (~andrebarb@62.28.143.14) |
| 09:33.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 09:34.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 10:05.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev frawd (~francois@206.Red-88-24-191.staticIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 10:24.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 10:28.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 11:03.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ccesario (~ccesario@189-29-60-113-ac.cpe.vivax.com.br) |
| 11:20.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 11:20.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 11:57.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe_ (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 11:57.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 12:07.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Pazzo (~ugelt@reserved-225136.rol.raiffeisen.net) |
| 12:08.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 12:08.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 12:15.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev rrb3942 (~rbullock@208.34.105.161) |
| 12:19.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 12:19.09 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 12:38.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev guilhermebr (~Guilherme@200.103.96.98) |
| 12:59.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev akshayb (~akshay@140.203.211.166) |
| 13:03.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@tesla.alkaloid.net) |
| 13:14.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 13:14.26 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 13:14.34 | oej | Afternoon |
| 13:16.31 | oej | Another 1.4 release coming up? |
| 13:17.28 | leifmadsen | today |
| 13:17.31 | leifmadsen | I'm working on it now |
| 13:22.26 | oej | Ok |
| 13:22.39 | oej | Just a regular release or something special? |
| 13:23.14 | leifmadsen | define, "something special" |
| 13:23.33 | leifmadsen | I'm just creating 1.4.34 from 1.4.34-rc2 and 1.6.2.10 from 1.6.2.10-rc2 |
| 13:23.51 | leifmadsen | of course all Asterisk releases are special! |
| 13:25.06 | oej | Like a security release... |
| 13:26.25 | oej | I have opened issues for some of my branches |
| 13:26.59 | oej | Trying to get time to merge stuff into trunk from various projects |
| 13:27.37 | leifmadsen | no security releases that I'm aware of |
| 13:27.46 | oej | That's good |
| 13:27.47 | oej | :-) |
| 13:28.03 | leifmadsen | and if I was, I couldn't tell you about them :D |
| 13:28.05 | leifmadsen | (joke) |
| 13:29.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@UNVLON55-1176057127.sdsl.bell.ca) |
| 13:41.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 13:41.17 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 13:46.41 | *** part/#asterisk-dev oej (~olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 13:52.58 | pabelanger | m16610 |
| 13:53.00 | MuffinMan | [ready for review] [Asterisk] Formats/format_wav 0016610: [patch] [OpenSolaris] wav format produces garbage files reported by bklang https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16610 |
| 13:54.12 | pabelanger | Anybody for 'shipit' status? Multiple people confirmed fix. Seems to be a trivial fix (re-ordering code). |
| 13:59.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@94.127.49.1) |
| 14:00.25 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mpe (~mpe@gate.ipvision.dk) |
| 14:02.35 | putnopvut | pabelanger: I'll take a look |
| 14:02.56 | pabelanger | putnopvut: danka |
| 14:07.07 | putnopvut | Well, the patch has the potential to segfault if get_filestream() returns NULL. That's the one thing that stands out to me. Aside from that, if stuff appears to be working, then I give my "ship it!" |
| 14:12.02 | pabelanger | putnopvut: Right, does if (!fs || fs->write_buffer = ast_malloc(32768)) make sense then? |
| 14:12.20 | pabelanger | actually |
| 14:14.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev The_Boy_Wonder (~vossel@asterisk/batman-developer/dvossel) |
| 14:14.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o The_Boy_Wonder] by ChanServ |
| 14:16.44 | putnopvut | I'll be honest, I'm not really sure what the correct thing to be doing there is. It seems like the steps should be allocate fs, if it's allocated, then allocate the fs write buffer, otherwise, call the rewrite_wrapper() function. |
| 14:17.09 | putnopvut | wait that's not correct either. |
| 14:18.00 | pabelanger | Ok, just confirmed get_filestream() will return NULL, so segfault is possible. |
| 14:18.05 | pabelanger | :) |
| 14:18.21 | putnopvut | allocate fs. If it's allocated, then allocate the write_buffer and then move onto the rewrite_wrapper() call. If either allocation fails, then do some cleanup and exit with a failure code. |
| 14:19.57 | pabelanger | putnopvut: Great thanks. Will post notes in issue and attempt a patch. |
| 14:20.31 | putnopvut | pabelanger: All righty |
| 14:25.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev edguy3 (~edguy@ool-43521c56.dyn.optonline.net) |
| 14:26.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (~jpeeler@asterisk/developer/jpeeler) |
| 14:26.20 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 14:52.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 15:00.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pentanol (~Unknown@91.195.60.231) |
| 15:02.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 15:02.02 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 15:06.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 15:06.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 15:25.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (~CunningPi@204.239.8.157) |
| 15:31.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:31.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:33.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 16:10.55 | tzafrir_laptop | Is there still a point of including autosupport in the deb package of asterisk? |
| 16:12.56 | Corydon76-dig | autosupport? |
| 16:13.11 | Corydon76-dig | What's autosupport? |
| 16:13.33 | tzafrir_laptop | contrib/scripts/autosupport |
| 16:13.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (~caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 16:14.26 | Corydon76-dig | I'd say leave it |
| 16:14.34 | tzafrir_laptop | Installed in 'make install' ('bininstall') |
| 16:15.25 | tzafrir_laptop | I'm not entirely happy with a name that is not related to "asterisk" |
| 16:15.46 | Corydon76-dig | astautosupport? |
| 16:15.52 | tzafrir_laptop | I just wonder if it's still in use |
| 16:15.59 | Corydon76-dig | Yes, it's still in use |
| 16:16.06 | tzafrir_laptop | ok |
| 16:16.41 | Corydon76-dig | It's one of the attachments we get in internal support tickets |
| 16:18.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 17:14.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (~eliels@201.234.94.226) |
| 17:14.35 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 17:46.37 | philipp64|laptop | can we reopen 11243 for the GSM vs. GCC-4.2 issue? |
| 17:46.40 | philipp64|laptop | M11243 |
| 17:46.44 | MuffinMan | [closed] [Asterisk] Codecs/codec_gsm 0011243: Distortion in Playback of .gsm files over non-GSM channel reported by whiskerp https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11243 |
| 17:47.02 | philipp64|laptop | Michael states that the modified patch works for him, and it's trivial. |
| 17:47.29 | philipp64|laptop | it would be nice to put this to bed for good. |
| 17:50.29 | pabelanger | philipp64|laptop: Just create a new issue, attach patch and we can reference the original. |
| 17:52.01 | philipp64|laptop | okay. |
| 17:58.50 | leifmadsen | that's the better way of doing it |
| 17:58.53 | leifmadsen | much easier to track |
| 18:06.27 | pabelanger | philipp64|laptop: BTW: no need to ask the same question in multiple places (list / irc). One or the other is fine |
| 18:18.09 | philipp64|laptop | M17688 |
| 18:18.11 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Codecs/codec_gsm 0017688: [patch] GCC 4.2.x optimizations result in improper behavior of GSM codec reported by pprindeville https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17688 |
| 18:18.45 | philipp64|laptop | Can someone mark this as 'tested' please? Keuter tested the patch last night. Thanks. |
| 18:21.03 | pabelanger | philipp64|laptop: Yes, we will triage it. When time permits. |
| 18:21.51 | Qwell | that seems like a huge hack workaround |
| 18:22.31 | philipp64|laptop | How is M11688's functionality different than what Olle recommends? |
| 18:22.35 | MuffinMan | [ready for testing] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_sip/NewFeature 0011688: [patch] Allow Sipura handsets (SPA942) to use Asterisk SLA via implementation of Broadsoft Sip extensions reported by grossi https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=11688 |
| 18:23.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 18:23.03 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 18:23.27 | philipp64|laptop | Qwell: well, the simplest fix would have been to have someone try to understand why the object generated with gcc 4.2 is different that any other compiler version, but that investigation was never done. |
| 18:24.13 | philipp64|laptop | unless you've got another idea... |
| 19:24.03 | philipp64|laptop | read Olle's note on 11688 but can't say I understand the difference... is the dialog-info uniformly supported? the SPA-942 hasn't had a firmware update in 3 years, and it's probably EOE at this point. |
| 19:26.12 | russellb | Qwell: but if it solves someone's problem ... *shrugs* ... should be harmless |
| 19:30.27 | philipp64|laptop | what's the better way? |
| 19:31.06 | philipp64|laptop | Steve seems convinced that there's a directive that would better inform the data-flow optimization by the GCC peephole optimizer to do the right thing. |
| 19:31.28 | philipp64|laptop | though I disagree with him about how much the generated code would change from one version to another. |
| 19:32.05 | russellb | i have no idea |
| 19:41.43 | pabelanger | Corydon76-dig: ping? |
| 20:00.49 | *** part/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (~caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 20:08.28 | snuff-home | gives jpeeler a hug :) |
| 20:08.54 | jpeeler | :D |
| 20:09.51 | russellb | backflips |
| 20:10.57 | snuff-home | i thought 'backflips' were only for polictitions ;) |
| 20:31.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev alecdavis (~alec@210.48.127.227) |
| 20:33.05 | alecdavis | M17318 somebody want to review it, and perhaps give it a 'ship it' |
| 20:33.10 | MuffinMan | [feedback] [DAHDI-linux] NewFeature 0017318: [patch] FXS Polarity Reversal on Hangup reported by armeniki https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17318 |
| 20:38.10 | alecdavis | russellb: I see you've taken a provisional look, I will of course remove all debug output when commited. |
| 20:38.33 | russellb | yeah, it "looks" fine at first glance |
| 20:38.42 | russellb | i'd have to go and see where each part of the code was inserted |
| 20:38.49 | russellb | chan_dahdi is bad about having 329847293847 line switch statements |
| 20:49.42 | alecdavis | russellb: removed all debug, there are 5 places where the line reversals are inserted. |
| 20:50.46 | russellb | can you document the values to set_polarity? in the sig_analog callback table? |
| 20:51.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev edguy3 (~edguy@c-98-221-27-224.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) |
| 20:55.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@bzq-218-155-145.cablep.bezeqint.net) |
| 20:55.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 21:17.17 | alecdavis | russellb: Documented the callbacks to set polarity in chan_dahdi, is that what you're looking for?? |
| 21:17.31 | tzafrir_laptop | Is there any other channel driver that uses the various channel/sig_* modules? |
| 21:17.41 | russellb | the new sig_analog callbacks, in sig_analog.h |
| 21:17.42 | tzafrir_laptop | Apart from chan_dahdi? |
| 21:17.46 | russellb | tzafrir_laptop: not yet |
| 21:18.46 | tzafrir_laptop | hmm... I saw creslin working on some chan_ss7 . Anything related? |
| 21:19.08 | russellb | i don't think his channel driver is using it |
| 21:19.55 | tzafrir_laptop | There are quite a few of those callbacks. In fact, I was thinking of adding an extra one (provide a name for a sig_pri_pri: call back? member?) |
| 21:22.55 | tzafrir_laptop | It's just that with all this reshuffle, chan_dahdi.c didn't get much smaller. But now we have 3 new members in the super-100kb club :-( |
| 21:26.23 | JunK-Y | ive put latest trunk in prod, so far so good! |
| 21:26.35 | Kobaz | jpeeler: i figured it out |
| 21:28.07 | alecdavis | russelb:my mistake, I had documented the new callbacks in sig_analog.h, not chan_dahdi as mentioned before. doh. |
| 21:28.58 | Corydon76-dig | pabelanger: belated pong |
| 21:31.07 | jpeeler | Kobaz: so i bet if you do /n things work properly |
| 21:35.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev PTorres (~PTorres@200.68.87.148) |
| 21:45.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~moy@74.12.99.17) |
| 22:03.59 | *** part/#asterisk-dev PTorres (~PTorres@200.68.87.148) |
| 22:21.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev _zoom_ (~zoom@41.218.33.171) |
| 22:23.05 | _zoom_ | hi guys, have u ever faced a problem of passing .729 over openvpn? |
| 22:23.41 | Qwell | _zoom_: what kind of problem? |
| 22:24.45 | _zoom_ | when rtp established the vpn tunnel died |
| 22:25.08 | Qwell | sounds like an openvpn question to me. has nothing to do with Asterisk code. |
| 22:26.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 22:26.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 22:27.30 | _zoom_ | i had tried .711 it works but when it comes to .729 deadair |
| 22:27.41 | _zoom_ | i'm really confused |
| 22:40.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (~snuffy@203-219-29-182.tpgi.com.au) |
| 22:40.06 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 22:54.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 23:06.34 | *** part/#asterisk-dev ManxPower (~manxpower@216.186.151.147) |
| 23:24.48 | pabelanger | Corydon76-dig: re-ping? |
| 23:28.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@tesla.alkaloid.net) |
| 23:34.57 | pabelanger | 302 Redirect to pabelanger-lap |
| 23:42.16 | Corydon76-dig | pabelanger: re-pong |
| 23:42.27 | Corydon76-dig | pabelanger-lap 404 Not found |
| 23:42.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202) |
| 23:42.33 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir] by ChanServ |