| 00:33.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 00:45.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 00:45.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 00:46.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev diegomad (mad@186.81.138.227) |
| 01:43.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 02:16.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 02:16.46 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 02:39.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev grinder13 (~grinder@cpc2-sgyl2-0-0-cust1286.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com) |
| 02:41.31 | grinder13 | hello guys! i would like to ask you if asterisk provided by Digium's RHEL/CentOS repo have the support for SRTP or ZRTP |
| 02:59.13 | Corydon76-dig | grinder13: Nope, not yet |
| 03:00.34 | Corydon76-dig | SRTP is in the works, and ZRTP probably won't be implemented until it gets into an RFC |
| 03:01.03 | Corydon76-dig | And even then, it'll depend upon someone getting the code into workable form |
| 03:02.39 | grinder13 | at least, is STP support compiled in the rpm packages provided by digium's repo? |
| 03:02.57 | Corydon76-dig | I have no idea what STP is |
| 03:03.05 | grinder13 | sorry typo |
| 03:03.08 | grinder13 | SRTP |
| 03:03.18 | Corydon76-dig | Not yet, no |
| 03:04.21 | Corydon76-dig | It's in a developer branch, and you're welcome to try it: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=5413 |
| 03:05.12 | grinder13 | so this means i have to compile it myself downloading the svn version from here: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/group/srtp |
| 03:06.43 | grinder13 | or this one? http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/group/srtp_reboot |
| 03:09.02 | snuff-work | i think ur better using the reboot |
| 03:09.22 | Corydon76-dig | Yep, the reboot looks more recent |
| 03:09.47 | snuff-work | hopefully there will be a ipv6 reboot soon :) |
| 03:10.01 | Corydon76-dig | snuff-work: yes |
| 03:10.14 | Corydon76-dig | and soon |
| 03:10.22 | Corydon76-dig | It will be in Asterisk in time for 1.8 |
| 03:10.41 | grinder13 | thanx guys |
| 03:10.53 | grinder13 | last question |
| 03:11.07 | grinder13 | do you have any support for encryption in h323? |
| 03:11.16 | snuff-work | haven't had chance to fix cdr_sqlite3 parsing yet ;) ? |
| 03:12.09 | Corydon76-dig | grinder13: There may be, but it's not something that we know how to do or how to support |
| 03:12.39 | Corydon76-dig | snuff-work: sorry, no, not on my current list |
| 03:14.19 | grinder13 | so, at the moment only iax encryption is the standard in the rpm packages |
| 03:14.57 | Corydon76-dig | At the moment, yes |
| 03:15.02 | grinder13 | i wonder if other people (eg Debian) have included SRTP in their packages |
| 03:15.21 | Corydon76-dig | I strongly doubt it, as the patch is rather invasive |
| 03:15.45 | Corydon76-dig | but you're welcome to ask |
| 03:15.47 | snuff-work | i might get around to attempting to fix myself.. :) |
| 03:16.32 | snuff-work | google opensources vp8 codec.. |
| 03:16.58 | grinder13 | yeap, Corydon it seems you are right. i dont see anything in their changelogs |
| 03:21.32 | Corydon76-dig | snuff-work: I think I may have a solution for you. Give me time for a test compile |
| 03:21.41 | Corydon76-dig | I'll let you test it, though |
| 03:22.51 | snuff-work | np |
| 03:27.44 | *** part/#asterisk-dev grinder13 (~grinder@cpc2-sgyl2-0-0-cust1286.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com) |
| 03:34.23 | Corydon76-dig | snuff-work: It's all yours |
| 03:37.22 | snuff-work | where is patch etc? |
| 03:38.53 | Corydon76-dig | https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17001 |
| 03:39.10 | Corydon76-dig | exactly where you filed the issue |
| 03:41.01 | snuff-work | k ;) |
| 03:48.43 | snuff-work | building/testing |
| 03:51.16 | snuff-work | grr stupid atom machine had to rebuild all of * |
| 03:59.28 | snuff-work | works fine |
| 04:32.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (~dwayne@c-71-207-214-190.hsd1.al.comcast.net) |
| 04:32.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 05:38.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 05:38.59 | *** topic/#asterisk-dev is Topic for #asterisk-dev is: Asterisk Development Discussion -=- http://www.asterisk.org/developers -=- Tier 2 and 3.14159265 support is in #asterisk -=- IAX2 is now RFC 5456. |
| 07:24.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pentanol (~pentanol@77.35.49.164) |
| 08:29.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sgimeno (~chatzilla@83.46.36.105) |
| 08:57.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 08:57.41 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 09:12.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev alecdavis (~alec@202-78-149-14.cable.telstraclear.net) |
| 09:58.07 | *** part/#asterisk-dev alecdavis (~alec@202-78-149-14.cable.telstraclear.net) |
| 10:35.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Cresl1n (~matt@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 10:35.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 10:38.32 | Cresl1n | Hey all |
| 10:38.41 | Cresl1n | any europeans around at this late hour? |
| 10:47.46 | Cresl1n | tzafrir_laptop: you up? |
| 10:47.47 | Cresl1n | :-) |
| 10:51.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Marquis42 (~bfhbmw0@65-127-126-34.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 10:55.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Gugge (~gugge@vlan2.dlxhosting.dk) |
| 11:28.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 11:28.32 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 11:49.31 | hurdman | hi |
| 11:55.12 | tzafrir_laptop | Cresl1n, it's not really late here, but I'l BBL |
| 11:55.21 | Cresl1n | :-) |
| 11:55.21 | Cresl1n | ok |
| 11:57.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 11:57.40 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 12:09.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev file (~file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) |
| 12:09.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o file] by ChanServ |
| 12:11.27 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (~caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 12:14.35 | *** join/#asterisk-dev vrban (~chatzilla@p50997436.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 12:14.55 | atis_work | it's not late |
| 12:15.02 | atis_work | i'm around |
| 12:32.47 | pabelanger | morning all |
| 12:34.14 | leifmadsen | pabelanger: morn! |
| 12:48.37 | snuff-home | walks around the room.. |
| 12:50.07 | russellb | follows snuff-home |
| 12:51.17 | leifmadsen | starts a conga line |
| 12:51.34 | leifmadsen | russellb: are you in the france?! |
| 12:51.37 | snuff-home | :) |
| 12:56.11 | kpfleming | issues.asterisk.org (and svnview.digium.com, and reviewboard.asterisk.org) are all currently unavailable due to a malfunctioning server... we'll try to get this situation cleared up ASAP |
| 12:56.40 | leifmadsen | thanks for the heads up! |
| 12:59.59 | snuff-home | leif doesn't need to work.. what a shame.. pitty still a internal jira still lives ;0 |
| 13:01.04 | leifmadsen | snuff-home: there's still documentation to write :) |
| 13:02.19 | snuff-home | sometimes doco becomes something that opens a app/product to too many not so bright ppl ;) |
| 13:02.44 | snuff-home | i dont think i have any other doco related patches in my queue.. |
| 13:04.26 | leifmadsen | ya I was working on stuff about bug tracker flows yesterday |
| 13:04.41 | snuff-home | any other 'doco' related things to be done for asterisk.. 'specific' stuff.. |
| 13:05.01 | leifmadsen | I noticed cel-doc.tex needs to be updated.. |
| 13:05.45 | snuff-home | in what way.. |
| 13:06.26 | leifmadsen | well there are notes in it that state one section is now out of data and needs to be re-written, and at the bottom there is a section that should have examples of how to creating a billing record, but that never got done |
| 13:06.38 | russellb | leifmadsen: i am, yes |
| 13:06.44 | leifmadsen | russellb: \o/ |
| 13:07.24 | russellb | it's very french |
| 13:07.30 | pabelanger | oui! |
| 13:07.40 | leifmadsen | ya I noticed that too when I was there |
| 13:07.41 | snuff-home | i thought the cel stuff had at least showing how many records are generated.. |
| 13:08.08 | leifmadsen | snuff-home: yes, I'm just talking about the documentation -- look at the file I just referenced and you'll see what I mean |
| 13:08.09 | russellb | it had a couple of examples i think |
| 13:10.45 | snuff-home | mm can't check myself atm.. haven't re-svn'ed since upgrading laptop and svn.asterisk is down atm :) |
| 13:11.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev file (~file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) |
| 13:11.09 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o file] by ChanServ |
| 13:21.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kerframil (~kerframil@gentoo/user/kerframil) |
| 13:53.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 13:53.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 13:55.27 | seanbright | la da da dee |
| 13:57.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jtexter3 (~jtexter3@72.242.229.213) |
| 13:57.10 | russellb | yawns |
| 13:57.42 | kpfleming | russellb: when do you speak? |
| 13:57.56 | russellb | every day, don't you? |
| 13:58.04 | kpfleming | lol |
| 13:58.05 | russellb | (Friday.) |
| 13:58.05 | kpfleming | snark |
| 13:59.29 | kpfleming | any other digiumites there? |
| 14:00.32 | jsmith | I think Steve Sokol was going, no? |
| 14:00.59 | leifmadsen | ya |
| 14:01.24 | tzafrir_laptop | Cresl1n still around? |
| 14:03.10 | kpfleming | probably on his way into the office |
| 14:03.13 | kpfleming | it's 09:00 here |
| 14:04.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (~chatzilla@74.12.133.16) |
| 14:12.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bklang (~bklang@tesla.alkaloid.net) |
| 14:38.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 14:38.33 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:39.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (~jeffg@pdpc/supporter/professional/jeffg) |
| 14:49.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev diegomad (~mad@190.146.200.120) |
| 14:51.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (~jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 14:51.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 14:54.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dwayne (~dwayne@75-150-14-49-Atlanta.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 14:56.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (~CunningPi@204.239.8.157) |
| 15:00.51 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kazaa_lite (~eddie@78-86-126-14.zone2.bethere.co.uk) |
| 15:01.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (~sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 15:01.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 15:17.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (~atis_work@193.238.212.171) |
| 15:39.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jetsnoc (~brian@kickback-66.eth242.twf.pmt.org) |
| 15:50.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 16:02.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv (~timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 16:11.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 16:11.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 16:23.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (~eliels@201.234.94.226) |
| 16:23.03 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 16:31.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev elguero (~miguel323@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 16:42.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (~kpfleming@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 16:42.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 17:04.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Kobaz (~kobaz@its.kobaz.net) |
| 17:06.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev miguel3239 (~miguel323@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 17:07.12 | kpfleming | fyi: mantis is a major memory hog. |
| 17:12.26 | kazaa_lite | Corydon76-dig: :'( |
| 17:33.43 | Corydon76-dig | kazaa_lite: huh? |
| 17:34.36 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (~eliels@201.234.94.226) |
| 17:34.36 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 17:35.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (~atis_work@193.238.212.171) |
| 17:35.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev TheDavidFactor (~chatzilla@nc-71-0-16-133.dhcp.embarqhsd.net) |
| 17:37.06 | kazaa_lite | help me |
| 17:37.11 | leifmadsen | help me, help you |
| 17:37.50 | kazaa_lite | but the question is not related to development, but may be i was sounding stupid that no one answered my question on #asterisk |
| 17:39.06 | kazaa_lite | what if i ask question on #asterisk and you guys answer there? |
| 17:39.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev TheDavidFactor (~chatzilla@nc-71-0-16-133.dhcp.embarqhsd.net) |
| 17:39.44 | kazaa_lite | fine? this way no one will bash me here:D |
| 17:40.21 | TheDavidFactor | lleifmadsen, ping |
| 17:40.36 | TheDavidFactor | too many "L"s |
| 17:40.43 | TheDavidFactor | leifmadsen: ping |
| 17:40.48 | leifmadsen | pong! |
| 17:42.13 | TheDavidFactor | hey! quick Q for you. I emailed about that dude with the odbc crashing asterisk problem. well he's pastebined a crash and I was wondering if you could suggest who might be the best person to look at it? |
| 17:42.50 | leifmadsen | TheDavidFactor: right now, no one unfortunately. All the developers time has been allocated for this month :( |
| 17:43.56 | TheDavidFactor | ok, no prob. I'll poke around and see what I can come up with. I'll be back next month ;-) |
| 17:44.17 | leifmadsen | :D |
| 17:44.26 | TheDavidFactor | are all the USA developers tied up doing taxes? :-P |
| 17:44.33 | leifmadsen | audits |
| 17:44.35 | Qwell | TheDavidFactor: precisely |
| 17:44.49 | leifmadsen | TheDavidFactor: I'd say Corydon76-dig is the main ODBC guru though |
| 17:45.24 | TheDavidFactor | ok, thanks. I'll try to do enough research to be able to ask intelligent questions. |
| 18:03.33 | putnopvut | Someone help me. My brain is melting, and I need to make sure I'm not grossly misinterpreting a piece of code: |
| 18:03.56 | putnopvut | if (!(some_fd = mkstemp(variable)) > -1) |
| 18:04.15 | putnopvut | Basically, I think the author wanted to be sure some_fd is greater than -1. |
| 18:04.15 | kpfleming | that's ugly |
| 18:04.20 | putnopvut | But that code doesn't do that. |
| 18:04.26 | kpfleming | right |
| 18:04.33 | putnopvut | Okay,so it's not just me :) |
| 18:04.46 | Qwell | I read that as if ((!some_fd) > -1) |
| 18:04.53 | putnopvut | Qwell: exactly |
| 18:04.53 | kpfleming | right |
| 18:05.06 | kpfleming | converting something to a boolean, then testing to see if it is greater than -1 |
| 18:05.11 | *** part/#asterisk-dev TommyBotten (tommy@broken.pipe.no) |
| 18:05.16 | putnopvut | Yeah, it'll always be true. |
| 18:05.18 | kpfleming | which on some platforms, will always be true |
| 18:05.26 | kpfleming | on others, a boolean 'true' is -1 as a signed int |
| 18:05.31 | putnopvut | interesting. |
| 18:05.43 | kpfleming | sometimes 'true' is '1', sometimes it's '-1' |
| 18:05.47 | Qwell | kpfleming: one of those silly platforms where NULL != 0? |
| 18:05.53 | kpfleming | no |
| 18:05.53 | putnopvut | Well thanks for the quick feedback on that one. |
| 18:06.04 | kpfleming | i don't think the C standard mandates the integer value of 'true' |
| 18:06.24 | kpfleming | relying on boolean conversion to a specific integer value may be undefined behavior |
| 18:06.33 | putnopvut | I wouldn't do it. |
| 18:09.01 | putnopvut | Basically, that if that if is always returning true like I believe it to be, it would explain why I have dozens of temporary logfiles in my tmp directory. Bad jitterbuffer code! BAD! |
| 18:09.04 | kpfleming | well, you can rely on 'false' being zero. |
| 18:09.28 | putnopvut | s/that if/if/ |
| 18:10.54 | putnopvut | I have to be reading this code wrong. ugh |
| 18:12.37 | putnopvut | Oh wait, I'm definitely reading the code correctly! Hallelujah! |
| 18:14.23 | putnopvut | Ah, this particular bug is actually fixed in the tip of the particular branch I'm using, so no biggie, I guess. |
| 18:16.53 | putnopvut | jpeeler fixed it in r 251631. I should explain to him why his change worked since in his commit message he says he doesn't understand why it does. |
| 18:17.18 | leifmadsen | putnopvut: w00t! then update the commit message for others as well |
| 18:21.49 | jpeeler | i have been enlightened... maybe i should like read the code more carefully |
| 18:22.23 | file | ack! jpeeler speaks! |
| 18:25.09 | Corydon76-dig | TheDavidFactor: what was your odbc question? |
| 18:27.44 | TheDavidFactor | Corydon76-dig: I've got a guy that asked me about res_odbc crashing asterisk if it's passed bad SQL code. Here's what he saw: http://pastebin.com/Dd24J0wM I'm working on setting up a dev environment to try to duplicate the problem and start testing |
| 18:28.11 | TheDavidFactor | any pointers on what to look at first would be greatly appreciated |
| 18:29.13 | Corydon76-dig | Since it's a double free, I'd suggest valgrind |
| 18:30.49 | TheDavidFactor | ok, thanks. is there a valgrind readme or howto? I'm a noob ;-) |
| 18:31.22 | Corydon76-dig | Yes, doc/valgrind.txt |
| 18:31.24 | leifmadsen | I think there is some stuff in the doc/ directory |
| 18:35.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (~atis_work@193.238.212.171) |
| 18:38.07 | seanbright | /* More than 200 columns in this CDR? Yeah, right... */ |
| 18:38.12 | seanbright | el oh el |
| 18:38.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev miguel3239 (~miguel323@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
| 18:39.03 | atis_work | huh.. i got ~60 |
| 18:40.39 | Corydon76-dig | seanbright: I had to pick some number for it... |
| 18:40.52 | seanbright | yeah |
| 18:41.05 | atis_work | probably enough.. |
| 18:41.11 | seanbright | heh |
| 18:41.20 | seanbright | whats the over/under for the first bug report? |
| 18:41.28 | atis_work | 332 |
| 18:41.32 | atis_work | oops |
| 18:43.06 | Corydon76-dig | Keep in mind that this is for sqlite... |
| 18:43.31 | Corydon76-dig | If you're storing more, you probably ought to be using a real database |
| 18:46.45 | seanbright | Corydon76-dig: i don't disagree with the change. just anticipating an issue appearing on mantis. our users are nuts. |
| 18:47.06 | TheDavidFactor | seanbright: it's not just your users.... |
| 18:48.21 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Pazzo (~ugelt@sadsl-246059.rol.raiffeisen.net) |
| 18:52.13 | seanbright | R602 |
| 18:52.18 | MuffinMan | [R602] Add an option to restore past broken behavor of the Events manager action [Submitted] Submitted by mnicholson => https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/602/ |
| 18:52.29 | seanbright | that applies to 1.4, trunk, and 1.6.2 only? |
| 18:52.41 | seanbright | seems odd |
| 18:54.13 | Corydon76-dig | seanbright: your users are nuts? |
| 18:54.55 | seanbright | our |
| 18:54.58 | seanbright | asterisk's |
| 18:56.13 | Corydon76-dig | Like I said, your users |
| 18:57.03 | seanbright | i'm confused |
| 18:57.31 | seanbright | there is an insult in there somewhere i think, but i'll pretend otherwise |
| 18:58.20 | philipp64 | putnopvut: appreciate the review. if we need a second sign off on it and oej can't do it... who else is capable? |
| 18:58.42 | putnopvut | philipp64: hmm...thinking. |
| 18:59.02 | philipp64 | I nominate tzafrir! |
| 18:59.09 | putnopvut | he's the first person to come to mind since I believe he forged the way, so to speak, with domain code. |
| 18:59.19 | putnopvut | means oej, not tzafrir |
| 18:59.55 | leifmadsen | what about Nick_Lewis? |
| 18:59.58 | philipp64 | yeah, me too, but if he's non responsive... how long is a reasonable amount of time to wait? |
| 19:00.06 | putnopvut | I'd say maybe a week. |
| 19:00.09 | Corydon76-dig | For oej, 6 months |
| 19:00.10 | philipp64 | (don't know him) |
| 19:00.13 | putnopvut | heh |
| 19:00.16 | leifmadsen | ++ |
| 19:00.18 | putnopvut | gotta go for a bit. brb |
| 19:00.42 | Corydon76-dig | Gotta be sure to give him a chance to get over a back injury (yes, he actually expected this of us) |
| 19:01.53 | philipp64 | back injury? |
| 19:02.01 | philipp64 | hadn't heard. |
| 19:02.51 | Corydon76-dig | He was flat on his back some months back, never got online, and then complained about all the things that got done that he disapproved of while he was absent |
| 19:03.57 | leifmadsen | I think we can move on |
| 19:05.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dwayne (~dwayne@75-150-14-49-Atlanta.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 19:08.06 | seanbright | there is something satisfying about making code that is slow as sin run lightning fast |
| 19:08.22 | seanbright | i think that should have been slow-as-sin and lightning-fast |
| 19:08.25 | seanbright | but i'm not sure |
| 19:11.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 19:16.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (~anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 19:25.16 | *** part/#asterisk-dev kazaa_lite (~eddie@78-86-126-14.zone2.bethere.co.uk) |
| 19:28.01 | seanbright | hmm. should that most recent chan_sip commit have made it into the RCs? |
| 19:28.26 | seanbright | M16774 |
| 19:28.31 | MuffinMan | [closed] [Asterisk] Core/RTP 0016774: [patch] [regression] 1.6.1.13 and 1.6.1.14 UDP ports not freed reported by kowalma https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16774 |
| 19:28.34 | seanbright | that one? |
| 19:29.32 | seanbright | leifmadsen: ^^^ |
| 19:30.04 | leifmadsen | seanbright: you mean the RC2's I just created that I needs to get merged into? |
| 19:30.09 | leifmadsen | s/I/it/ |
| 19:30.11 | leifmadsen | errrr |
| 19:30.13 | leifmadsen | whatever |
| 19:30.32 | seanbright | oh. |
| 19:30.38 | seanbright | shuts up |
| 19:30.40 | leifmadsen | :D |
| 19:30.46 | seanbright | i forget we copy tags |
| 19:30.51 | leifmadsen | it'd have been a lot more obvious if Entomologist was stable |
| 19:30.54 | leifmadsen | right |
| 19:31.08 | leifmadsen | that is a relatively new process now though |
| 19:31.15 | leifmadsen | so you are forgiven... THIS time |
| 19:31.33 | seanbright | awesome |
| 19:32.02 | putnopvut | philipp64: Basically I'm going to wait until the end of the week on your review request. If no one pipes up, I'll just commit it. It can always be reverted or modified later. |
| 19:34.32 | philipp64 | putnopvut: ok. in the meantime, I was going to try testing a patch to do the other thing we talked about: adding a pointer in sip_pvt back to the sip_peer structure. |
| 19:34.51 | philipp64 | understanding, of course, that if a sip reload happens, that this could point back to a "stale" entry. |
| 19:35.33 | philipp64 | also asked (on the mailing list) for a pointer to olle's SIPFROMDOMAIN commit... he said it went into trunk. |
| 19:37.54 | philipp64 | yow... something up with svnview? it's really slow. |
| 19:39.10 | philipp64 | leifmadsen: I'm thinking that Olle's SIPFROMDOMAIN fix would work nicely with 17058... |
| 19:42.07 | Corydon76-dig | philipp64: that machine has been having issues this week. I suspect a Chinese spider, but that's based only upon past issues with them, no actual proof |
| 19:44.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 19:44.38 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 19:46.26 | Corydon76-dig | philipp64: Looks like it has recovered |
| 19:48.03 | philipp64 | nope... |
| 19:49.05 | Corydon76-dig | Well, it did, briefly. Hopefully, you're not trying to do an annotate |
| 19:49.22 | Corydon76-dig | Mantis is better, anyway |
| 19:49.39 | philipp64 | I'm just trying to find Olle's SIPFROMDOMAIN commit so I can try building 1.6.2 with it. |
| 20:03.52 | seanbright | philipp64: commit 151739 |
| 20:05.47 | philipp64 | seanbright: thanks. |
| 20:08.06 | philipp64 | odd... so it is already in 1.6.2 |
| 20:08.13 | philipp64 | what about the SIPFROMUSER patch? |
| 20:09.21 | seanbright | that might not be the patch you were talking about. i just did an 'svn blame' with a grep |
| 20:13.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202) |
| 20:13.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 20:14.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Dovid (~annon@213.8.121.90) |
| 20:21.24 | tzafrir_laptop | What exactly is the license of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Asterisk_logo.svg ? |
| 20:21.49 | tzafrir_laptop | I want to include it as a logo for an article in the Hebrew wikipedia |
| 20:22.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jtodd (z5m5cgwtku@asterisk/community-director-and-tie-dye-shirt-lover/jtodd) |
| 20:22.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jtodd] by ChanServ |
| 20:23.51 | seanbright | it's a digium trademark |
| 20:24.08 | seanbright | i couldn't use it in the TeX documentation |
| 20:24.33 | seanbright | which is bundled with asterisk... that may or may not be helpful |
| 20:32.00 | Corydon76-dig | tzafrir_laptop: I have to refer you to our legal department on that one |
| 20:45.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev orn (~orn@194-144-94-105.du.xdsl.is) |
| 20:47.08 | philipp64 | seanbright: Olle's email refers to "a branch" (maybe trunk)... what other branches might he be using? |
| 20:47.42 | orn | Using asterisk 1.6.2.6. When Asterisk receives a 484 Address Incomplete response, it sends an ACK, but hangs in the dialplan and doesn't go to the next priority. Is this intentional? |
| 20:47.56 | orn | Instead it goes to the Timeout priority after 7 seconds |
| 21:08.44 | orn | Asterisk also does not forward the packet to the originating caller until |
| 21:08.59 | orn | * until the timeout is reached... sorry, hit enter by accident |
| 21:09.19 | kpfleming | asterisk does not forward signaling packets. it is not a proxy. |
| 21:10.02 | orn | ok, sorry, it does not send information on the call leg back to the originator until the timeout is reached (presumably since the channel is still active for some reason) |
| 21:10.47 | kpfleming | yeah |
| 21:11.01 | kpfleming | it's expecting additional digits from the caller to try to complete the address, i suspect |
| 21:11.11 | kpfleming | but if they aren't going to come, then it has to wait for a timeout |
| 21:11.24 | putnopvut | Yeah, but if the phone doesn't get the 484, it doesn't know to send more digits. |
| 21:12.01 | kpfleming | well. actually, even if the 484 was sent to the phone, the channel would be torn down anyway, to be created again when the phone sends another INVITE with more digits. |
| 21:12.09 | putnopvut | ah, true. |
| 21:12.25 | kpfleming | so what is happening now really doesn't make any sense at all |
| 21:12.25 | putnopvut | Still, the phone needs the 484, though. |
| 21:12.44 | kpfleming | a 484 received on an outbound channel should terminate app_dial and return to the dialplan, unless i'm missing something |
| 21:13.23 | putnopvut | Yeah, now that you mention it, we had to have reached a Dial() or some such to be sending any INVITEs of our own. |
| 21:13.44 | putnopvut | Why was Asterisk doing overlap outbound dialing on a SIP channel anyway? |
| 21:13.50 | kpfleming | it wasn't |
| 21:13.57 | kpfleming | there is no such thing as 'overlap' dialing on SIP, really |
| 21:14.04 | putnopvut | yeah, that's what we call the option though. |
| 21:14.12 | kpfleming | it just sent an INVITE with a URI that wasn't complete in the eyes of the receiver |
| 21:14.28 | kpfleming | oh.. does chan_sip actually have an 'overlap dialing' concept? |
| 21:14.42 | putnopvut | kpfleming: yep. On incoming calls, if Asterisk doesn't match an extension wholly, then we'll send a 484. |
| 21:14.50 | putnopvut | But outbound is a different story entirely. |
| 21:14.51 | kpfleming | well, that's different |
| 21:15.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pyite (~dschreibe@unaffiliated/pyite) |
| 21:16.50 | kpfleming | orn: as a workaround, you can set the Digit Timeout on the channel to zero before calling dial |
| 21:16.51 | orn | in this case, asterisk is the one sending the incomplete request to a UAC |
| 21:17.02 | kpfleming | to a UAS, it's the UAC |
| 21:17.16 | orn | indeed |
| 21:20.39 | orn | interesting |
| 21:21.42 | orn | if I set the timeout to 0, it does indeed tear the channel down immediately, but it sends a 503 to the requesting client |
| 21:21.53 | orn | whereas if i leave it at its default value, it sends a 484 |
| 21:22.26 | orn | is it simply because setting it to 0 removes the possibility of adding more digits so that would be misleading to the requesting client? |
| 21:23.27 | orn | if I set the timeout to 1 it sends a 484 |
| 21:23.34 | orn | so i guess it's something like that |
| 21:35.49 | kpfleming | yeah, probably so |
| 21:43.23 | orn | here's what happens if you're interested http://pastebin.com/kdgqFjPQ |
| 21:44.59 | orn | i find line 173 interesting -- i would think that should cause asterisk to hangup the channel |
| 21:46.20 | orn | anyway, just putting it out there in case anyone is interesting in taking a look =) Thanks for the Timeout suggestion |
| 22:22.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lbarth (~lbarth@62.216.165.71) |
| 22:36.12 | kpfleming | orn: most of us are interesting, but that doesn't mean we'll look at it :-) |
| 23:45.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pabelanger_ (~pabelange@CPE004010100002-CM00159a090f12.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 23:46.19 | pabelanger_ | M17169 |
| 23:46.22 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Applications/app_playback 0017169: [patch] no sound on Playback(<file>,noanswer) reported by leroi05 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17169 |
| 23:46.51 | pabelanger_ | just to confirm, we did revert this functionality because it br0ked some people dialplans. |
| 23:47.07 | putnopvut | That's what leifmadsen was saying earlier. |
| 23:47.56 | pabelanger_ | Ok, that is what I figured too. Either way the proper solutions is to use Progress() in your dialplan. |
| 23:48.25 | putnopvut | Yep, simple enough. I kind of wish I could provide more exact reasoning than "it br0ked some people dialplans" though :-/ |
| 23:48.38 | putnopvut | Like I wish I could point to specific issues.. |
| 23:48.49 | putnopvut | But I was not involved in such, unfortunately. |
| 23:49.42 | pabelanger_ | :) Don't worry about it |
