| 00:13.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@202.56.7.217) |
| 01:23.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnach0 (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 01:42.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev thansen (n=thansen@76.27.110.194) |
| 04:12.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev CunningPike (n=CunningP@S01060014bf81366b.vc.shawcable.net) |
| 05:10.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnacho (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 05:14.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev errotan (n=errotan@62.201.123.22) |
| 05:19.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnach0 (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 05:56.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev WeazelON (n=deazel@mail2.tikalnetworks.com) |
| 05:58.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@202.56.7.217) |
| 06:46.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (n=tzafrir@local.xorcom.com) |
| 06:46.18 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 07:51.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarkRift (n=dark@65.92.166.229) |
| 08:28.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 08:28.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 08:46.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev yidiyuehan (n=yidiyueh@bb116-14-126-121.singnet.com.sg) |
| 08:47.05 | yidiyuehan | <PROTECTED> |
| 08:50.37 | yidiyuehan | anybody? basically I just want to modify the softphone keypad that, once I click the keypad, it will initiate a call of two other hard IP phones. |
| 09:00.37 | tzafrir_laptop | yidiyuehan, hmm.. why not pick an existing soft-phone? |
| 09:01.49 | tzafrir_laptop | one thing you should ask yourself: how much control should the user have of the SIP settings? |
| 09:03.34 | yidiyuehan | hi, tzafrir, actually that's what I am thinking, but I need to modify a bit over the keypad applications. |
| 09:04.58 | yidiyuehan | eg: Somebody press digit 1 over the soft phone and dial, Two other IP Hard Phones (like exten 123 & 456) will ring and talk to each other. |
| 09:40.21 | *** part/#asterisk-dev tompaw (n=tompaw@slave20.tesserakt.eu) |
| 10:01.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev downs (n=downs@p4FD57C09.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 10:01.40 | downs | hi |
| 10:01.47 | downs | I have hit upon a weird bug. |
| 10:02.13 | downs | 1.6.2.0:channels/chan_sip.c:9417 |
| 10:02.20 | downs | <PROTECTED> |
| 10:02.25 | downs | this produces "m=video 0" |
| 10:02.33 | downs | whereas the following debug statement |
| 10:02.43 | downs | results in "Video is at 192.168.2.40 port 10298" |
| 10:02.50 | downs | this strongly indicates that there is a bug in ast_str_append. |
| 10:02.56 | downs | I modified the produced string to verify. |
| 10:05.04 | downs | Facing that daunting #define-heavy function, I am unsure how to proceed. |
| 10:07.23 | downs | <PROTECTED> |
| 10:07.28 | downs | that was a bit stupid of me |
| 10:07.49 | downs | leaves the question though, why the debugging statement uses a different variable than the statement it is meant to debug. |
| 10:09.08 | downs | this is probably a stupid mistake of mine. |
| 10:09.17 | downs | please, pre-emptively ignore the above. |
| 10:13.30 | downs | Right. Before I make a further fool of myself .. have fun, thanks for a great product |
| 10:13.37 | *** part/#asterisk-dev downs (n=downs@p4FD57C09.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 10:14.03 | oej | Debugging is debugging... ;-) |
| 11:04.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 11:44.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev qdk (n=qdk@81.7.168.130) |
| 12:06.27 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Weazel (n=deazel@mail2.tikalnetworks.com) |
| 12:13.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev phidelta (n=phidelta@081-003-240-156.dyn.orange.at) |
| 12:39.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 12:39.24 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 12:42.15 | snuff-home | morning morning kpfleming |
| 12:42.52 | kpfleming | yes, monday morning it is |
| 12:43.17 | snuff-home | getting close to tuesday here as usual |
| 12:47.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eliel (n=eliels@200.61.172.61) |
| 12:47.15 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o eliel] by ChanServ |
| 12:47.15 | oej | I have all reasons to believe it is Monday here too. |
| 12:48.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnacho (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 12:52.09 | snuff-home | poor oej connection |
| 12:54.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jeffg (n=jeffg@pdpc/supporter/active/jeffg) |
| 12:54.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Victor_Yure (n=victor@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 13:03.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 13:03.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 13:04.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 13:04.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 13:12.28 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 13:15.42 | oej | Leif! Are you talking to me? |
| 13:19.20 | leifmadsen | oej: nope! :) |
| 13:20.52 | oej | You said so on Twitter ;-) |
| 13:21.07 | oej | And I'm no Republican |
| 13:23.58 | kpfleming | twitter? has it recovered yet? |
| 13:25.03 | leifmadsen | I never noticed it was down :) |
| 13:25.20 | leifmadsen | oej: no, I was talking to your Republican friends ;) |
| 13:26.11 | oej | Twitter keeps having overload issues |
| 13:27.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dwayne (n=dwayne@76.29.245.9) |
| 13:35.34 | jtodd | oej: Aren't you supposed to be on vacation? |
| 13:36.02 | oej | No, not this week |
| 13:36.03 | oej | Next week |
| 13:36.19 | oej | If I am, then my family will be really pissed off, since I'm in the office. |
| 13:36.32 | oej | I was in Spain until midnight though, doing training |
| 13:39.28 | jtodd | Ah, OK. |
| 13:50.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev putnopvut (n=putnopvu@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson) |
| 13:50.09 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
| 14:21.24 | seanbright | M15412 |
| 14:21.27 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Core/General 0015412: When reporting a bug the system change my logged in name to another user in the network reported by Reine (Karma: neutral) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15412 |
| 14:21.47 | seanbright | oh |
| 14:21.57 | seanbright | now i get it. it's a bug about mantis itself. |
| 14:23.23 | leifmadsen | yes -- which should be in the Mantis group |
| 14:23.49 | leifmadsen | done |
| 14:26.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=dwayne@75.76.254.162) |
| 14:26.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 14:29.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev corramor (n=corramor@nat/digium/x-4c5c4e7262976659) |
| 14:50.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 14:50.16 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 14:57.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev dbrooks (n=dbrooks@nat/digium/x-59c2f15e655b49dd) |
| 14:57.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev |Cybex| (n=John@80.100.126.176) |
| 15:12.40 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Corydon76-lap (n=Corydon7@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 15:12.41 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Corydon76-lap] by ChanServ |
| 15:14.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev errotan (n=errotan@62.201.123.22) |
| 15:32.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 15:33.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (n=james@unaffiliated/jameswf-home) |
| 15:33.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev malcolmd (n=malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd) |
| 15:33.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ |
| 15:35.40 | seanbright | hmmm |
| 15:35.50 | seanbright | trying to 'svn update' the newcdr branch and getting: |
| 15:35.58 | russellb | the branch has been removed |
| 15:36.03 | seanbright | sean@elixer:~/dev/asterisk/team/group/newcdr$ svn update |
| 15:36.03 | seanbright | svn: Target path does not exist |
| 15:36.05 | seanbright | oh right |
| 15:36.06 | russellb | feel free to hack on it in trunk |
| 15:36.06 | seanbright | haha |
| 15:36.12 | seanbright | <-- not smart |
| 15:38.35 | tzafrir_laptop | seanbright, svn info #? |
| 15:38.52 | tzafrir_laptop | ah, ok |
| 15:40.42 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv[work] (n=timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 15:44.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:44.26 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:49.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev xpot-mobile (n=james@static-66-182-88-85.bbsc.net) |
| 15:51.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ccesario (n=ccesario@189-19-6-236.dsl.telesp.net.br) |
| 15:57.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev sruffell (n=sruffell@asterisk/the-kernel-guy/sruffell) |
| 15:57.23 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o sruffell] by ChanServ |
| 16:00.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnach0 (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 16:18.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev bbryant (n=brett@c-68-59-22-114.hsd1.sc.comcast.net) |
| 16:18.54 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o bbryant] by ChanServ |
| 16:27.57 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 16:27.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 16:29.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 16:29.39 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 16:31.02 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Pazzo (n=ugelt@p549468A7.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 16:38.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (n=moy@74.12.123.90) |
| 16:48.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev hugorebelo (n=hugorebe@200-171-132-124.completo.com.br) |
| 16:49.04 | seanbright | so for the reverse charge indication stuff in asterisk |
| 16:49.12 | seanbright | grrr |
| 16:49.22 | seanbright | i hate when i am mid-thought and realize something won't work |
| 16:50.25 | Corydon76-lap | seanbright: That's better than being mid-code and realizing it won't work |
| 16:51.08 | seanbright | indeed. |
| 16:51.22 | seanbright | well here is my question... |
| 16:51.48 | seanbright | Dial(DAHDI/1/5555555555&DAHDI/2/6666666666,...) |
| 16:52.14 | seanbright | what would be the recommended way of specifying that the first dial string |
| 16:52.22 | seanbright | err |
| 16:52.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev eferro (n=eferro@godzilla.alea-soluciones.com) |
| 16:52.44 | seanbright | that the first dial string wants reverse change indication, but the second doesn't |
| 16:53.00 | Corydon76-lap | Easy. Use the Local/ channel |
| 16:53.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Victor_Yure (n=victor@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 16:53.33 | seanbright | ok |
| 16:53.35 | seanbright | thanks. |
| 16:53.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev davevg-btwtech (n=davevg__@67.76.177.147) |
| 16:53.43 | Corydon76-lap | OR use a flag in the dial string, similar to what we already do for things like localpridialplan |
| 16:55.00 | seanbright | k |
| 16:55.09 | seanbright | the local channel option is silly |
| 16:55.15 | seanbright | i'll take a look at the dial string idea |
| 16:55.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 16:56.02 | Corydon76-lap | Line 4700 in trunk in chan_dahdi |
| 16:57.17 | seanbright | i think you may need to svn update |
| 16:58.00 | Corydon76-lap | probably |
| 16:58.30 | seanbright | jpeeler committed the first round of 'split up signalling modules' changes |
| 16:58.38 | seanbright | so all the pri stuff is in sig_pri.c now |
| 16:58.42 | seanbright | but i see what you are talking about |
| 16:58.43 | seanbright | thanks. |
| 17:03.38 | Juggie | seanbright, how did the G729 sip stuff go |
| 17:19.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev oej (n=olle@ns.webway.se) |
| 17:19.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o oej] by ChanServ |
| 17:33.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 17:40.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Victor_Yure (n=victor@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 17:45.26 | tzafrir_laptop | has given up on commenting on the voicemail-conf branch. |
| 17:45.31 | tzafrir_laptop | Just looks too odd |
| 17:47.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ctooley (n=ctooley@76.22.158.92) |
| 17:47.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o ctooley] by ChanServ |
| 17:48.07 | putnopvut | tzafrir_laptop: I agree with you |
| 17:49.06 | seanbright | same here |
| 17:49.17 | seanbright | can't we just say "hey... stop" |
| 17:50.21 | russellb | the concerns have been expressed very clearly |
| 17:50.33 | russellb | if they want to proceed, then that's fine |
| 17:50.53 | russellb | of course, if concerns aren't addressed, the future of code as far as making it in to trunk is doomed |
| 17:51.13 | seanbright | you may want to communicate that to them |
| 17:51.26 | seanbright | and with that, i withdraw further commentary on the topic. |
| 17:51.33 | russellb | but if nothing else, he's learning more about asterisk |
| 17:51.38 | russellb | and that's a good thing. |
| 18:10.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 18:10.37 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 18:14.01 | tzafrir_laptop | what version of libpri is needed to build current chan_dahdi (trunk)? |
| 18:16.58 | seanbright | the latest? |
| 18:18.33 | tzafrir_laptop | does this mean an SONAME change is needed somewhere? |
| 18:18.41 | tzafrir_laptop | where? |
| 18:20.22 | seanbright | let me try building asterisk trunk with each version of libpri |
| 18:20.28 | seanbright | i'll generate a report for you |
| 18:20.35 | seanbright | and post it on the internet |
| 18:22.53 | seanbright | russellb: when you did the ao2 conversion of ast_channel did you do app_rpt? |
| 18:23.17 | leifmadsen | seanbright: he is on a conference call till 3pm EST |
| 18:23.31 | leifmadsen | and I doubt app_rpt was touched at all |
| 18:23.36 | seanbright | alrighty |
| 18:23.36 | leifmadsen | that application is pretty much avoided |
| 18:23.40 | seanbright | gotcha |
| 18:26.18 | seanbright | so if we aren't going to maintain it, i'll just svn rm it |
| 18:27.34 | leifmadsen | heh.... not quite |
| 18:29.36 | tzafrir_laptop | sig_pri is not built with the libpri opts? |
| 18:33.48 | tzafrir_laptop | channels/sig_pri.c will be built is chan_dahdi is built. But what if we don't have PRI support? |
| 18:41.45 | tzafrir_laptop | so menuselect dependencies can only be attached to "main" modules? |
| 18:42.03 | tzafrir_laptop | e.g. to chan_dahdi.c, but not to sig_pri.c |
| 18:42.40 | tzafrir_laptop | so how to the CFLAGS of chan_dahdi.c end up effecting sig_pri.c ? |
| 18:44.02 | tzafrir_laptop | heads home |
| 18:58.56 | seanbright | leifmadsen: addons moving into asterisk? |
| 19:05.30 | russellb | seanbright: potentially |
| 19:05.43 | seanbright | nifty |
| 19:05.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnacho (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 19:18.56 | Qwell | seanbright: why don't you tell us how you really feel about that module? |
| 19:19.28 | seanbright | it's garbage with a capital garbage |
| 19:19.52 | seanbright | i know there are political reasons for keeping it around |
| 19:20.01 | seanbright | well, i'm assuming as much |
| 19:20.09 | seanbright | but it just seems like a big ass waste of time |
| 19:20.22 | Juggie | tries to catch up, which module? |
| 19:20.29 | Qwell | Juggie: app_rpt.. |
| 19:20.45 | seanbright | app_cRaPT |
| 19:20.46 | seanbright | ohhh |
| 19:20.51 | Qwell | seanbright: We should make it so it only compiles if you do ./configure --I-am-Dude |
| 19:20.51 | seanbright | i like it |
| 19:21.07 | seanbright | well that wouldn't make it compile |
| 19:21.13 | seanbright | that would make it *try* to compile |
| 19:21.17 | seanbright | we should remove it |
| 19:21.19 | Qwell | touche |
| 19:21.21 | seanbright | that is what we *should* do |
| 19:21.24 | Juggie | when i hear a complaint about a crappy module i assume voicemail, so i have to ask :) |
| 19:21.26 | seanbright | and i'm done |
| 19:27.52 | Corydon76-lap | Hey, now, voicemail isn't crappy |
| 19:29.34 | seanbright | oh god |
| 19:29.36 | seanbright | struct by_lightning lock_ring_copy[32]; |
| 19:29.39 | seanbright | seriously? |
| 19:30.24 | putnopvut | seanbright: wtf is that? |
| 19:30.30 | putnopvut | (w means 'where') |
| 19:30.54 | seanbright | app_rpt |
| 19:31.09 | seanbright | i keep looking it for some reason |
| 19:31.17 | seanbright | i'm masochistic |
| 19:31.39 | putnopvut | seanbright: yeah, it's a bad idea to look at that for any length of time. |
| 19:32.03 | Greek-Boy | in which include file is ASTERISK_VERSION defined? |
| 19:32.12 | russellb | version.h :-) |
| 19:32.28 | putnopvut | seanbright: ew, memcpy of an array of mutexes?! |
| 19:32.34 | leifmadsen | russellb: when that extension->device mapping issue is corrected... do you think a new release candidate from 1.4 branch should be created, or should I really just be applying the patches from those issues to a new -rcX tag? |
| 19:32.36 | putnopvut | seanbright: dammit, now you've got me looking at it! |
| 19:32.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 19:33.02 | russellb | leifmadsen: good question. We'll have to review what changes have been made, their value/risk |
| 19:33.09 | leifmadsen | russellb: fair enough |
| 19:33.21 | russellb | bbl, lunch |
| 19:33.42 | seanbright | putnopvut: sorry. i've closed it. |
| 19:34.06 | Greek-Boy | russellb: Thanks, just wanted to be sure |
| 19:34.06 | seanbright | lunch sounds like a good idea. i think i'll do that myself. |
| 19:35.09 | putnopvut | app_rpt even has some DEBUG_THREADS-esque lock-tracking logic embedded in it. |
| 19:35.14 | Greek-Boy | russellb: I'm look at an older source. 1.4.14 hence why I couldn't find version.h. I'll just get the latest svn revision to work from. |
| 20:15.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (n=tzafrir@bzq-179-75-202.static.bezeqint.net) |
| 20:15.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 20:26.34 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Victor_Yure_ (n=victor@unaffiliated/victoryure/x-837844) |
| 20:48.50 | *** join/#asterisk-dev paravoid (n=paravoid@zebra.cslab.ece.ntua.gr) |
| 20:54.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzanger (n=tzanger@gromit.mixdown.ca) |
| 20:56.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnach0 (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 20:58.46 | *** join/#asterisk-dev macli (n=macli@nmc.brc.ubc.ca) |
| 21:03.02 | russellb | Greek-Boy: you can also just do ... grep -r ASTERISK_VERSION * and see what comes up. |
| 21:05.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 21:05.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 21:12.58 | *** join/#asterisk-dev MikeJ (n=MikeJ@freeswitch/developer/mikej) |
| 21:13.25 | *** part/#asterisk-dev MikeJ (n=MikeJ@freeswitch/developer/mikej) |
| 21:20.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ctooley (n=ctooley@76.22.158.92) |
| 21:20.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o ctooley] by ChanServ |
| 21:57.43 | tzafrir_laptop | sruffell, here? |
| 21:58.10 | *** join/#asterisk-dev suma (n=root@64.92.218.196) |
| 21:59.05 | sruffell | tzafrir_laptop:here |
| 22:01.21 | tzafrir_laptop | what happens if a module is not adapted to use references? |
| 22:03.20 | kpfleming | we should be able to fix that with a macro |
| 22:03.28 | kpfleming | so that API compatibility is preserved |
| 22:03.39 | sruffell | nothing will happen....the owner would be NULL, and module_put and try_module_get do nothing. |
| 22:04.05 | sruffell | unless you mean, you want to be able to unload a module on which there are open channels... |
| 22:04.30 | sruffell | and the behavior would be the same as it is now. |
| 22:05.00 | tzafrir_laptop | well, if nothing happens (except, maybe, an ugly warning), it's fine |
| 22:05.15 | sruffell | although....I couldn't test the xpp drivers... |
| 22:05.33 | sruffell | The way I read it, worst case...there would be an extra reference, but otherwise, everything will work like they do now. |
| 22:05.46 | tzafrir_laptop | I figure I'll test them in the coming days :-) |
| 22:06.12 | sruffell | I knew I could count on you. Btw...I'm testing the B410P tonight so you hopefully will be able to merge the wcb4xxp patch. |
| 22:06.48 | sruffell | ....and this week (not tonight) I'll re-familiarize myself with the sysfs... |
| 22:07.59 | sruffell | although...I think since the "trunk is open" and the patch passed the smoke test...if you wanted to go ahead and merge the wcb4xxp patch now if you were only waiting on me....I don't see a problem with that. |
| 22:08.52 | tzafrir_laptop | ok. I'll try to do that tommorow |
| 22:10.27 | sruffell | tzafrir_laptop: oh..and one more thing...as much as I hate to say this, I'm going to need to spin out a 2.2.0.1 version tonight because of a problem with RHEL4. You're not aware of anything you would want in a point release? |
| 22:10.46 | sruffell | related to the xpp drivers specifically. |
| 22:11.04 | tzafrir_laptop | no |
| 22:11.10 | sruffell | ok, thanks. |
| 22:15.44 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@202.56.7.217) |
| 22:29.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev otherwiseguy (n=otherwis@cpe-75-87-106-119.kc.res.rr.com) |
| 22:38.14 | *** join/#asterisk-dev seanbright (n=sean@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/seanbright) |
| 22:38.14 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o seanbright] by ChanServ |
| 22:49.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev qdk (n=qdk@0x573d8dd1.bynqu1.dynamic.dsl.tele.dk) |
| 23:45.54 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |