| 00:26.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@119.30.36.85) |
| 00:47.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DTMF (n=someone@77.30.14.35) |
| 00:47.32 | DTMF | hi there |
| 01:00.31 | DTMF | I have DTMF detection problem... how can I change dsp.c file in asterisk 1.6 to force it to recognize my provider's DTMF specifications |
| 01:23.15 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnacho (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 01:46.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 01:46.59 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 01:52.17 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (n=moy@CPE001cdfec4cee-CM00080dab8485.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 03:08.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev codefreeze-lap (n=murf@72.21.67.40) |
| 03:08.30 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o codefreeze-lap] by ChanServ |
| 04:05.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Octothorpe (n=Octothor@pdpc/supporter/professional/octothorpe) |
| 04:10.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kamanashisroy (n=kamanash@119.30.36.70) |
| 04:11.12 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-work (n=aaa@203.19.141.34) |
| 04:11.12 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-work] by ChanServ |
| 04:49.23 | *** join/#asterisk-dev fiddur (n=fiddur@c042.rit.se) |
| 05:07.29 | *** join/#asterisk-dev mvanbaak (n=michiel@asterisk/contributor-and-bug-marshal/mvanbaak) |
| 05:07.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o mvanbaak] by ChanServ |
| 05:11.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnach0 (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 05:20.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev lmsteffan (n=laurent@reef.ac-noumea.nc) |
| 05:29.52 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Octothorpe (n=Octothor@pdpc/supporter/professional/octothorpe) |
| 06:00.41 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Pazzo (n=ugelt@reserved-225136.rol.raiffeisen.net) |
| 06:30.30 | *** join/#asterisk-dev obnauticus (n=obnautic@about/windows/regular/obnauticus) |
| 06:33.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev obnauticus (n=obnautic@about/windows/regular/obnauticus) |
| 06:38.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Octothorpe (n=Octothor@pdpc/supporter/professional/octothorpe) |
| 07:19.59 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tamiel (n=tamiel@213.30.183.226) |
| 07:46.24 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 08:39.18 | *** join/#asterisk-dev IgorG (n=igorg@host-92-124-160-11.pppoe.omsknet.ru) |
| 08:57.27 | tzafrir_laptop | M15327 |
| 08:57.29 | MuffinMan | [new] [DAHDI-linux] General 0015327: oops after removing an echocan module that is in use reported by tzafrir (Karma: +120.50) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15327 |
| 08:58.36 | tzafrir_laptop | Fixing this would probably take adding proper reference counting |
| 10:11.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev caio1982 (i=caio1982@CAcert-br/caio1982) |
| 10:24.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev DarkRift (n=dark@65.92.165.100) |
| 10:36.13 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Router222 (n=CK@212.98.141.199) |
| 10:37.02 | Router222 | i am using asterisk 1.6 with Asterisk fax module do you know how to stop the fax session when channel hangup ? since its a bug |
| 10:53.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev qdk (n=qdk@81.7.168.130) |
| 10:54.05 | Router222 | wherei can report this error ? |
| 10:54.57 | Router222 | bugs.diugium.com ? |
| 10:55.44 | tzafrir_laptop | issues.asterisk.org , which is the same |
| 10:55.59 | tzafrir_laptop | which fax module? app_fax? |
| 10:56.08 | Router222 | SendFax |
| 10:56.13 | tzafrir_laptop | app_fax |
| 10:56.46 | Router222 | core show application Send |
| 10:56.49 | Router222 | core show application SendFax |
| 11:04.35 | tzafrir_laptop | SendFax is part of app_fax |
| 11:05.50 | Router222 | ok |
| 11:06.29 | Router222 | tzafrir_laptop do you now why ? |
| 11:10.00 | tzafrir_laptop | because there's a bug in the code? :-( |
| 11:10.53 | Router222 | in asterisk 1.6.0.6 or in the Sendfax apps |
| 11:19.07 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 11:19.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 11:25.26 | Router222 | tzafrir_laptop ? |
| 11:40.17 | mvanbaak | kpfleming: I'm uploading the vmware images right now |
| 11:40.26 | kpfleming | yay! |
| 11:40.28 | kpfleming | thanks |
| 11:40.38 | mvanbaak | kpfleming: OpenBSD has gcc 4.2 though |
| 11:40.54 | kpfleming | well,i can build gcc 4.3 on it |
| 11:41.04 | kpfleming | our linux VMs are debian etch which doesn't include 4.3 either |
| 11:41.04 | mvanbaak | yeah, that should be ok |
| 11:41.33 | mvanbaak | all 4 freebsd VMs have gcc 4.3 :) |
| 11:41.51 | mvanbaak | if you want you can even install gcc 4.4 on them using 'sysinstall' |
| 11:57.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (n=snuffy@203.219.29.182) |
| 11:57.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 12:56.11 | *** join/#asterisk-dev snuff-home (n=snuffy@203-219-29-182-bri-ts6-2600.tpgi.com.au) |
| 12:56.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o snuff-home] by ChanServ |
| 12:58.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev leifmadsen (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 12:58.00 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ |
| 12:58.59 | leifmadsen | morning all! |
| 13:01.18 | snuff-home | ello leifmadsen |
| 13:12.31 | leifmadsen | how goes today snuff-home ? |
| 13:16.06 | snuff-home | not too bad |
| 13:16.14 | snuff-home | bout time to get some zzz's though |
| 13:16.41 | leifmadsen | ya... end of monday for you? |
| 13:16.43 | snuff-home | work = extra boring today.. |
| 13:16.46 | snuff-home | yep |
| 13:17.01 | snuff-home | 23:30 monday |
| 13:17.05 | leifmadsen | yuck... my monday just started |
| 13:17.07 | snuff-home | or there bouts |
| 13:18.01 | snuff-home | thinks a great monday would be one were you could go.. look 100 bugs solved over the w/end.. gotta love those fairies |
| 13:18.04 | snuff-home | :) |
| 13:21.06 | snuff-home | is contemplating if a 'putback' function is even nessecary in smdi.. no users.. of it either.. |
| 13:26.25 | snuff-home | disappears off to land of fence jumping sheep and rolling hills.. |
| 13:29.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev BlargMaN00 (n=blarg@12.234.16.130) |
| 13:36.23 | kpfleming | done |
| 13:36.28 | kpfleming | oops, wrong window :-) |
| 13:49.49 | mvanbaak | ;) |
| 13:53.32 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 14:19.27 | seanbright | kpfleming: i wish there was a starbucks at my gym. it would make going a lot easier. |
| 14:28.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anonymouz666 (n=anonymou@189.24.131.30) |
| 14:31.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jicksta (n=jicksta@67.164.0.78) |
| 14:38.09 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jpeeler (n=jpeeler@asterisk/digium-software-dev/jpeeler) |
| 14:38.09 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o jpeeler] by ChanServ |
| 14:47.55 | putnopvut | seanbright: at the University of Alabama, they had a Smoothie King inside the gym. That was always a great way to end a workout. |
| 14:49.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Deeewayne (n=dwayne@75.76.254.162) |
| 14:49.45 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
| 14:51.09 | kaii | mh .. must one be approved to mail to asterisk-dev? i replied to one question, but i cant see it now, 1 hour later |
| 14:51.59 | leifmadsen | kaii: one must just be registered with the list |
| 14:52.10 | leifmadsen | there is no administrator on the asterisk mailing lists |
| 14:52.26 | leifmadsen | asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com ? |
| 14:52.36 | kaii | ok. i am registered .. |
| 14:52.44 | leifmadsen | that's about all you need to do then |
| 14:53.35 | kaii | yes, the reply has "To: asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com" |
| 14:53.35 | leifmadsen | not too sure beyond that then |
| 14:53.35 | kaii | maybe lazy greylisting or stuff |
| 14:57.25 | kaii | mh i see.. i subscribed with "user+identifier@domain" for better filtering for incoming mail. |
| 14:57.40 | kaii | for my mail to be passed to the list, i need to send it from the correct address, right? |
| 14:58.51 | mvanbaak | yes |
| 14:59.33 | kaii | thx |
| 15:00.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev kpfleming (n=kpflemin@asterisk/digium-director-of-software-tech/kpfleming) |
| 15:00.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
| 15:17.38 | *** join/#asterisk-dev xpot-mobile (n=james@static-66-182-88-85.bbsc.net) |
| 15:32.26 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 15:41.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev marv[work] (n=timr@router.asteriasgi.com) |
| 15:46.56 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Corydon76-lap (n=Corydon7@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) |
| 15:46.56 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Corydon76-lap] by ChanServ |
| 16:14.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev jameswf (n=james@unaffiliated/jameswf-home) |
| 16:25.39 | *** join/#asterisk-dev RoyCrowder (n=roy@net-216-37-64-130.in-addr.worldspice.net) |
| 17:33.37 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 17:50.22 | *** join/#asterisk-dev xpot-mobile (n=james@144.35.21.106) |
| 17:59.04 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Iamnacho (i=Iamnacho@ip174-70-137-120.ks.ks.cox.net) |
| 18:05.22 | mvanbaak | kpfleming: let me know if the vm's are any good please ;) |
| 18:12.34 | seanbright | kpfleming: pglobal? |
| 18:14.14 | mvanbaak | I wonder as well |
| 18:14.28 | seanbright | google is less than helpful |
| 18:17.33 | mvanbaak | more and more these days |
| 18:17.52 | seanbright | ah, i found it. |
| 18:18.30 | seanbright | dwarves package in ubuntu. |
| 18:19.42 | mvanbaak | sweet. will have a look at it later |
| 18:21.22 | mvanbaak | yay! finally my home phone number is working again ! |
| 18:21.48 | mvanbaak | I HATE libc upgrades |
| 18:33.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 18:35.10 | leifmadsen | wedhorn: ping? |
| 18:38.37 | mvanbaak | is it about skinny ? |
| 18:40.49 | mvanbaak | ah well, not able to answer it now. dinner and vino time for me |
| 18:40.51 | mvanbaak | latero |
| 18:43.11 | kpfleming | yes, the dwarves package plus the pahole git repository from kernel.org |
| 18:43.33 | kpfleming | or... at least something like that |
| 18:43.47 | kpfleming | i built it all from source anyway |
| 18:48.48 | leifmadsen | mvanbaak: yes -- there is a bug that has been sitting stale for a while, and it was waiting on some skinny revamping from wedhorn |
| 18:48.56 | leifmadsen | M12324 |
| 18:48.58 | MuffinMan | [assigned] [Asterisk] Channels/chan_skinny 0012324: chan_skinny call control problems with 7921 reported by sbisker (Karma: +2.00) https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=12324 |
| 19:08.20 | *** join/#asterisk-dev |Cybex| (n=John@80.100.126.176) |
| 19:18.19 | *** join/#asterisk-dev korihor (n=korihor@190.72.244.218) |
| 19:20.45 | kpfleming | seanbright: and now you have documentation on how to use pglobal and pahole as well! |
| 19:20.56 | Qwell | what's pahole? |
| 19:21.20 | seanbright | kpfleming: nice work. |
| 19:21.23 | kpfleming | a tool for finding empty space inside structures |
| 19:21.31 | seanbright | too bad we can't change all of our structs :) |
| 19:21.57 | kpfleming | i fixed up the ones with the most to gain (sip_pvt and sip_peer) |
| 19:22.09 | kpfleming | the rest are no more than 16 bytes above their ideal size |
| 19:31.33 | *** join/#asterisk-dev tzafrir_laptop (n=tzafrir@bzq-179-75-202.static.bezeqint.net) |
| 19:31.33 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o tzafrir_laptop] by ChanServ |
| 19:32.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Octothorpe (n=Octothor@pdpc/supporter/professional/octothorpe) |
| 19:33.05 | *** join/#asterisk-dev atis_work (n=atis_wor@193.238.212.171) |
| 20:01.03 | *** join/#asterisk-dev outtolunc (n=me@adsl-66-218-53-172.dslextreme.com) |
| 20:11.49 | *** join/#asterisk-dev pdfhacker (n=dd@38.104.98.118) |
| 20:16.07 | russellb | pfft, who needs pahole when you can just declare attribute packed |
| 20:16.08 | russellb | runs |
| 20:19.24 | tzafrir_laptop | russellb, it lets you know how much space you gained. |
| 20:19.33 | tzafrir_laptop | which is a really good feeling |
| 20:20.07 | russellb | i was just trolling |
| 20:20.17 | tzafrir_laptop | so was I |
| 20:21.56 | russellb | I prefer forcing structures to be unaligned |
| 20:45.21 | kpfleming | well, if you just replace 'struct' with 'union', i find that they take a lot less memory |
| 20:45.38 | russellb | nice! |
| 20:45.41 | russellb | that's so easy |
| 20:45.49 | russellb | find exec sed ... |
| 20:47.01 | kpfleming | waits for the inevitable peanut gallery reviews of his first serious commit to chan_sip.c in a looong time |
| 20:47.38 | russellb | peanut gallery reviews? |
| 20:47.45 | russellb | way to trivialize your reviewers :-p |
| 20:48.01 | russellb | throws roasted peanuts at kpfleming |
| 20:48.02 | kpfleming | classic trolling |
| 20:48.16 | russellb | for that, I vow to find something wrong in your commit |
| 20:48.26 | kpfleming | i have no doubt you will |
| 20:48.33 | kpfleming | although i did comment the logic for some strange reason |
| 20:48.34 | kpfleming | i could remove that |
| 20:48.56 | russellb | Your comment is missing some capitalization and punctuation! |
| 20:49.30 | kpfleming | it's also missing the RFC number because i'm lazy |
| 20:49.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev moy (n=moy@74.12.123.90) |
| 20:49.42 | russellb | that's all i've got ... |
| 20:50.17 | kpfleming | i thought it would be harder, because i didn't realize we had already a very easy way to know whether we triggered the T.38 reinvite |
| 20:51.46 | kpfleming | crud... i forgot to include the issue number |
| 20:55.55 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Cresl1n (n=matt@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 20:55.55 | *** mode/#asterisk-dev [+o Cresl1n] by ChanServ |
| 20:58.12 | russellb | kpfleming: svn propedit --revprop to the rescue! |
| 20:58.21 | kpfleming | yeppers |
| 21:03.45 | mvanbaak | leifmadsen: ping |
| 21:03.58 | leifmadsen | mvanbaak: pong |
| 21:05.00 | mvanbaak | the skinny bug you mentioned |
| 21:05.05 | mvanbaak | I know how to fix it |
| 21:05.15 | mvanbaak | now if you pay my bills I will do it ;) |
| 21:05.46 | leifmadsen | mvanbaak: as long as your bills only involve the purchase of 1 bottle of wine, sure! |
| 21:05.51 | mvanbaak | I believe it is fixed by introducing rtp_timeout in chan_skinny |
| 21:05.59 | leifmadsen | ah gotcha |
| 21:06.23 | mvanbaak | I started work on that, but since my work is taking roughly 60 to 70 hours a week at the moment .... |
| 21:06.39 | leifmadsen | ya :( |
| 21:06.41 | leifmadsen | I know how it is |
| 21:06.43 | leifmadsen | no worries |
| 21:06.43 | mvanbaak | 1st work == asterisk work, 2nd mention of work is covide |
| 21:07.32 | mvanbaak | I'm almost there. all that is left is some function to check the rtp rx and tx timestamps and kill the session if it's over the configured timeout |
| 21:08.02 | mvanbaak | but.... we got rid of the do_monitor stuff with the move of vm notifications from pollbased to eventbased |
| 21:08.08 | mvanbaak | so we need to re-introduce that |
| 21:08.26 | mvanbaak | and the skinny rework that wedhorn has in his branch does not address this |
| 21:08.28 | kpfleming | russellb: so if 'ignoresdpversion' is being backported, does that mean it moves into the '1.6.0' section of CHANGES for all branches? |
| 21:08.53 | mvanbaak | kpfleming: my vms any good ? |
| 21:09.03 | mvanbaak | s/vms/vm's/ |
| 21:09.05 | kpfleming | won't be able to test them for a day or two |
| 21:09.15 | mvanbaak | no problem |
| 21:09.18 | mvanbaak | was just curious |
| 21:09.20 | kpfleming | actually, it was correct without the apostrophe :-) |
| 21:09.27 | mvanbaak | gheh |
| 21:09.32 | mvanbaak | <--- stupid dutchie |
| 21:09.40 | kpfleming | apostrophe is not used to indicate pluralness |
| 21:09.53 | kpfleming | even though miillions of stupid americans are doing it |
| 21:09.56 | russellb | kpfleming: yeah, that's a good idea |
| 21:09.59 | mvanbaak | whehehehehe |
| 21:10.00 | kpfleming | ok |
| 21:10.16 | *** join/#asterisk-dev ghenry (n=ghenry@pdpc/supporter/monthlybyte/ghenry) |
| 21:10.30 | mvanbaak | astricon 2010 will be the one where nancy and me will be |
| 21:10.35 | jsmith | kpfleming: The famous "grocer's apostrophe" |
| 21:10.41 | mvanbaak | we will be having a 3 week holiday around it |
| 21:11.17 | mvanbaak | we are sitting on the couch looking at hotelprices etc right now |
| 21:11.21 | kpfleming | jsmith: yes, it's getting worse on an exponential scale |
| 21:11.38 | jsmith | kpfleming: More grocers, perhaps? |
| 21:11.40 | jsmith | ducks |
| 21:11.48 | mvanbaak | jsmith, kpfleming the vms looked too much like OpenVMS to me :) |
| 21:12.16 | jsmith | mvanbaak: Vax to the rescue! |
| 21:12.41 | mvanbaak | :) OpenVMS is pretty scary! |
| 21:13.09 | seanbright | Corydon76-lap: that is the most frightening thing i have ever seen. |
| 21:13.10 | seanbright | nice work |
| 21:13.11 | seanbright | :) |
| 21:13.53 | seanbright | oh. nevermind. i thought you added that struct/union/struct/union, but you just moved it. |
| 21:13.57 | seanbright | credit goes elsewhere. |
| 21:14.08 | putnopvut | kpfleming: see number 2 on this page :) http://www.delmar.edu/engl/wrtctr/handouts/Grammar_Website/Apostrophes.htm |
| 21:14.32 | putnopvut | So you're right about "vms" being correct. |
| 21:14.41 | putnopvut | But apostrophes can be used to make some things plural. |
| 21:14.44 | Corydon76-lap | seanbright: I wrote that, too |
| 21:15.07 | kpfleming | that page seems wrong |
| 21:15.10 | Corydon76-lap | seanbright: it was a question of me putting it private before and then thinking.. oh fuck it, it's useful as a public structure, too |
| 21:15.25 | seanbright | it's purty |
| 21:15.25 | kpfleming | "a day's wage" is not pluraly |
| 21:15.37 | putnopvut | Tha's possessive. |
| 21:15.40 | kpfleming | and the apostrophe in "two days' wages" did not make it plural |
| 21:15.42 | kpfleming | the 's' did |
| 21:16.01 | putnopvut | Correct. |
| 21:16.04 | kpfleming | so really, the only case there is "if's" |
| 21:16.19 | kpfleming | which i hate anyway :_) |
| 21:17.12 | file | stuffs kpfleming in a mailbox |
| 21:17.15 | jsmith | kpfleming: You, me, and every other grammarian out there |
| 21:17.23 | Corydon76-lap | seanbright: it makes the massive amount of bits easy to manipulate |
| 21:19.28 | mvanbaak | god, gotta love asterisk |
| 21:19.32 | jameswf | your not correct.... |
| 21:19.33 | jameswf | ducks and watches the your you're police pop out |
| 21:19.46 | mvanbaak | with some agi magick you can even communicate with your PS3 |
| 21:20.23 | mvanbaak | right now when I'm playing Cod WaW Nazi Zombies my phone system goes to voicemail without interupting my game |
| 21:20.39 | mvanbaak | dances around and kills some nazi zombies |
| 21:20.46 | jameswf | thanks to asterisk I can no longer spell signalling so that said no English/grammar lessons from asterisk devs |
| 21:21.43 | mvanbaak | and it is fun to see callerid pictures in 1080p full-hd while the movie pauses when phone is ringing |
| 21:23.07 | kpfleming | jameswf: we support both spellings :-) |
| 21:23.23 | mvanbaak | pats his 140cm hd-tv |
| 21:23.56 | mvanbaak | eeeeeeep, thunderstorms here |
| 21:24.03 | mvanbaak | <---- scared |
| 21:25.10 | mvanbaak | really, I'm scared to death now |
| 21:25.12 | jameswf | kpfleming: yes i know now... still can never keep whichone is the right one... |
| 21:25.23 | mvanbaak | I _hate_ thunder/lightning |
| 21:25.30 | jameswf | quietly waits for monsoons |
| 21:25.55 | jameswf | hopes a microbirst cleans out some of the trailer parks |
| 21:26.21 | mvanbaak | I hope I can get this boat into a safe place before it becomes fatal |
| 21:27.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev thansen (n=thansen@c-76-27-110-194.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 21:27.27 | mvanbaak | this sux. we had such a nice place in the middle of nowhere with water only 1.5 meter deep so we threw out the anchor and called it a day |
| 21:27.57 | mvanbaak | now we have to hurry into a harbour (is that how you spell it ?) |
| 21:29.07 | kpfleming | it's one way to spell it, yes |
| 21:30.21 | mvanbaak | in about 6 years you guys should have the astricon in a place next to the ocean |
| 21:30.27 | mvanbaak | so I can sail to it |
| 21:30.51 | leifmadsen | kpfleming: when was that introduced? (curious since I just had errata about that today for TFoT) |
| 21:31.02 | leifmadsen | (that, referring to the single or double L's in signalling) |
| 21:31.16 | wedhorn | mvanbaak: I believe 12324 is related to call control rather than rtp, while there's still issues with the 79xx phones, the issue I highlighted appears to be fixed in my new stuff |
| 21:32.03 | mvanbaak | wedhorn: ok. as far as I could see they were all related to rtp |
| 21:32.10 | mvanbaak | s/all/both/ |
| 21:32.28 | mvanbaak | ok, not really rtp, but sessions |
| 21:32.41 | mvanbaak | but the sessions can be ended if we have rtp timeouts |
| 21:33.17 | mvanbaak | wedhorn: and I know, I've been slacking, but the new chan_skinny is not working with my 7905 nor my 7960 ;) |
| 21:33.36 | mvanbaak | (the one in your branch) |
| 21:34.23 | mvanbaak | speeddials have dissapeared, hangup is not working, and second call while first call is still connected causes segfault |
| 21:34.36 | mvanbaak | and I cannot back that with backtraces right now |
| 21:35.01 | mvanbaak | my wife has been giving me a hard time for 3 weeks, so I reverted to current -trunk for now |
| 21:35.04 | mvanbaak | sorry for the slacking |
| 21:42.06 | *** join/#asterisk-dev comradeb14ck (n=comradeb@72.37.252.50) |
| 21:47.50 | wedhorn | mvanbaak: no problems, it been stable here for a couple of months, so the fixes should be fairly trivial when we work out what the issues are |
| 21:48.21 | mvanbaak | wedhorn: I agree. it's only a matter of finding time to dive into it |
| 21:48.50 | wedhorn | oh yeah, my branch is out of date, i've got a merge that didn't work, so need to fix (once I do some reading up on svn) |
| 21:49.01 | comradeb14ck | i dont suppose any of you know what the maximum amount of variables you can pass into an AGI script are via the AGI dialplan command? |
| 21:49.18 | comradeb14ck | eg: AGI(test,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,...) |
| 21:49.51 | mvanbaak | wedhorn: you ok if I move it to team/group once I'm ready to get some work done on it ? |
| 21:51.16 | tzafrir_laptop | An audio hook is something that needs to be run in a thread of its own, right? |
| 21:51.36 | tzafrir_laptop | not a callback to an existing channel |
| 21:52.51 | comradeb14ck | nevermind, it can apparently support only 127 arguments |
| 21:54.24 | Qwell | comradeb14ck: If you have to pass that many args, you're probably doing it wrong |
| 21:54.25 | Corydon76-lap | Okay, I'll bite. Why do you need more than 127 arguments? |
| 21:54.50 | comradeb14ck | Qwell, im not trying to pass that many. I'm writing an AGI library and I'd like to know exactly how many to buffer for. |
| 21:55.52 | Corydon76-lap | What matters isn't how many you handle but rather what happens if you're handed too many |
| 21:56.21 | Corydon76-lap | Do you choke and die or do you handle it gracefully? |
| 21:56.38 | comradeb14ck | That's why I wanted to know. And now that I know. I'll define the buffer with 127 elements. |
| 21:56.38 | tzafrir_laptop | 127 arguments for a script doesn't sound like much |
| 21:56.58 | jameswf | I require a min of 353 |
| 21:57.19 | seanbright | .7 |
| 21:57.21 | tzafrir_laptop | comradeb14ck, what language do you use? |
| 21:57.24 | comradeb14ck | c |
| 21:57.38 | tzafrir_laptop | why not handle it like standard command-line? |
| 21:57.39 | jameswf | or in spanish si |
| 21:57.48 | comradeb14ck | tzafrir_laptop, how do you mean? |
| 21:58.17 | Corydon76-lap | tzafrir_laptop: because he doesn't know what that means |
| 21:58.20 | comradeb14ck | tzafrir_laptop, when you call an agi script, asterisk fills stdin with all of the standard variables for the script, and furthermore--it passes in up to 127 arguments passed to the script via the AGI() command |
| 21:58.39 | comradeb14ck | so it'll pass stuf flike agi_uniqueid: blah |
| 21:58.45 | comradeb14ck | then agi_arg_108: 7 |
| 21:58.54 | comradeb14ck | where 108 is a number from 1->127 |
| 21:59.10 | comradeb14ck | that's why im doing it like this, so i can reliably store arguments |
| 21:59.19 | comradeb14ck | in a char ** |
| 21:59.35 | comradeb14ck | (this is only 1.6) |
| 21:59.50 | comradeb14ck | previous versions dont support that new syntax =p |
| 21:59.57 | tzafrir_laptop | comradeb14ck, ahem. |
| 22:00.56 | Corydon76-lap | comradeb14ck: that's only important if you're using FastAGI |
| 22:01.19 | comradeb14ck | Corydon76-lap why is that? |
| 22:01.40 | Corydon76-lap | Because the variables are otherwise passed on the command line |
| 22:01.57 | seanbright | i don't think that is still true |
| 22:02.10 | seanbright | it does the agi_arg_* thing regardless of AGI/FastAGI |
| 22:02.13 | comradeb14ck | I didn't test that, but that's good to know. However, I'm currently using plain on AGI(), not fastAGI, and it still passes like I described above. |
| 22:02.14 | Qwell | seanbright: parsing that sentence makes my brain hurt |
| 22:02.14 | seanbright | ... i think |
| 22:02.22 | comradeb14ck | seanbright, yes you're right |
| 22:02.27 | tzafrir_laptop | comradeb14ck, why don't you look at how C passes the arguments (argc, argv) to programs |
| 22:02.30 | Corydon76-lap | seanbright: yeah, but it's additionally available on the command line |
| 22:02.35 | seanbright | Corydon76-lap: indeed. |
| 22:02.45 | seanbright | Qwell: really? you need coffeee |
| 22:02.50 | seanbright | or just plain coffee |
| 22:02.54 | seanbright | it's up to you |
| 22:03.11 | Qwell | does the extra 'e' have more caffeine? |
| 22:03.30 | comradeb14ck | tzafrir_laptop, i already know how to handle command line arguments. However, that's not the way I'd like to handle it since asterisk passes them in on stdin anyways. Why would I want to double parse them? I obviously want to get the from stdin, otherwise i wont be able to reliably read command return codes from asterisk without first clearing stdin. |
| 22:03.56 | comradeb14ck | It doesn't make sense to not use the functionality that asterisk offers.. |
| 22:04.03 | comradeb14ck | but *shrug* |
| 22:04.30 | Corydon76-lap | btw, it's 128 arguments, not 127 |
| 22:04.34 | comradeb14ck | its 127 |
| 22:04.39 | comradeb14ck | 128 including the script name |
| 22:04.42 | comradeb14ck | == 127 |
| 22:05.04 | comradeb14ck | agi_arg_1 -> agi_arg_127 |
| 22:05.07 | comradeb14ck | inclusive ^^ |
| 22:06.17 | comradeb14ck | btw thanks for all your input guys! im just playing around with this, and want to figure out exactly what is being done. i appreciate the help |
| 22:06.22 | Corydon76-lap | So you're not counting the script name as an argument? |
| 22:07.20 | comradeb14ck | Corydon76-lap, no--since it doesn't pass it as agi_arg_0, agi_arg_0 is not defined. agi_request contains the script name, and im explicitly referring to agi_arg_ values |
| 22:09.31 | Corydon76-lap | If you don't handle it, you're going to annoy users of your library |
| 22:09.42 | comradeb14ck | Don't handle what? |
| 22:09.56 | Corydon76-lap | People expect to be able to refer to argument 0 and get the script name |
| 22:10.09 | comradeb14ck | that's not the way asterisk handles it |
| 22:10.25 | Corydon76-lap | That's the way C programmers expect it |
| 22:10.30 | jameswf | grabs popcorn |
| 22:10.42 | comradeb14ck | it doesn't provide argument 0 for the script name, so it seems that if i implement that i'd frustrate coders by adding in functionality that is beyond that which asterisk supports natively D: |
| 22:10.52 | comradeb14ck | i want to adhere to the asterisk standards |
| 22:11.19 | comradeb14ck | not to mention, they can always pull agi_request for the script name |
| 22:11.23 | Corydon76-lap | What about C language standards? |
| 22:11.44 | comradeb14ck | it's already covered in the language standards |
| 22:11.57 | Corydon76-lap | gives up |
| 22:11.57 | comradeb14ck | im not handling command line argumetns, im handling an array of values that are pre-defined by asterisk |
| 22:12.28 | comradeb14ck | well it doesnt make sense to create a fake array value for no purpose. that would contain the same value in 2 places for no reason... |
| 22:12.31 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Octothorpe (n=Octothor@pdpc/supporter/professional/octothorpe) |
| 22:14.20 | wedhorn | mvanbaak: yep, feel free to move it anywhere |
| 22:23.28 | comradeb14ck | and from testing it looks like the maximum length of an argument in bytes is 500 |
| 22:23.35 | comradeb14ck | why did you guys pick 500? D: |
| 22:23.44 | comradeb14ck | 512 would be nice =p |
| 22:34.42 | Corydon76-lap | Actually, 512 - 48 would be even better |
| 22:41.37 | comradeb14ck | why 512-48? oo |
| 22:42.07 | Corydon76-lap | Heap memory allocator |
| 22:44.28 | Corydon76-lap | If you allocate a char[512], the allocator actually allocates a block of 1024, to cover the pointers used by the memory allocator |
| 22:45.13 | Corydon76-lap | Subtracting 48 from an even allocation size ensures that you won't unnecessarily eat up memory and only use about half of it |
| 22:47.42 | kpfleming | Corydon76-lap: that's only generally true in linux kernel space... the glibc memory allocator doesn't do that |
| 23:02.00 | *** join/#asterisk-dev qdk (n=qdk@0x573d8dd1.bynqu1.dynamic.dsl.tele.dk) |
| 23:06.51 | *** part/#asterisk-dev Cresl1n (n=matt@asterisk/libpri-and-libss7-expert/Cresl1n) |
| 23:17.47 | *** join/#asterisk-dev denon (i=denon@synapse.subneural.net) |
| 23:36.45 | *** join/#asterisk-dev Octothorpe (n=Octothor@pdpc/supporter/professional/octothorpe) |
| 23:46.01 | *** join/#asterisk-dev anthm (n=anthm@freeswitch/developer/anthm) |
| 23:53.08 | *** join/#asterisk-dev schmooze (n=schmooze@rrcs-67-52-212-6.west.biz.rr.com) |